DOCSLIB.ORG

Interesource Group (Ireland) Limited. 2013 a PRESCRIPTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interesource Group (Ireland) Limited. 2013 a PRESCRIPTION A PRESCRIPTION FOR CHANGE REPORT ON EU HEALTHCARE PROVISION FOR DEAF SIGN LANGUAGE USERS. Anna-Lena Nilsson Stockholm University Graham H. Turner Heriot Watt University Haaris Sheikh Trinity College Dublin Robyn Dean Heriot Watt University © Interesource Group (Ireland) Limited. 2013 Contents Contents............................................................................................................................2 Part 1 – Background & Context......................................................................................4 Introduction ....................................................................................................................4 Background .....................................................................................................................4 Exploring the Context .......................................................................................................5 Rationale behind MEDISIGNS ....................................................................................5 The Triadic Relationship ............................................................................................6 Interpreter Provision...................................................................................................6 Delivering a European CPD program...........................................................................7 Part 2 – Framing sign language interpreting ............................................................8 References to Part Two................................................................................................9 Part 3 – Country Snapshots.......................................................................................... 10 The current situation in the partner countries................................................ 10 Organisation of provision of services and accessibility of services............... 12 Cyprus............................................................................................................................. 12 Ireland............................................................................................................................ 12 Poland............................................................................................................................. 13 United Kingdom .......................................................................................................... 13 Sweden ........................................................................................................................... 14 Training; for healthcare staff, interpreters, and deaf sign language users . 15 Cyprus............................................................................................................................. 15 Training of interpreters for medical interpreting....................................................15 Training for deaf signed language users ......................................................................16 Ireland............................................................................................................................ 16 Training of interpreters for medical interpreting....................................................16 Training for healthcare staff..............................................................................................16 Training for deaf sign language users ...........................................................................17 Poland............................................................................................................................. 17 Training of interpreters for medical interpreting....................................................17 Training for healthcare staff..............................................................................................17 Training for deaf sign language users ...........................................................................17 United Kingdom .......................................................................................................... 17 Training of interpreters for medical interpreting....................................................17 Training for healthcare staff..............................................................................................18 Training for deaf sign language users ...........................................................................18 Sweden ........................................................................................................................... 19 Training of interpreters for medical interpreting....................................................19 Training for healthcare staff..............................................................................................19 Training for deaf sign language users ...........................................................................20 Quality in medical interpreting, good practice & Codes of Conduct .............. 20 Ireland............................................................................................................................ 20 Quality issues ...........................................................................................................................20 2 Codes of Conduct.................................................................................................................... 21 Poland .............................................................................................................................21 Quality issues........................................................................................................................... 21 Codes of Conduct.................................................................................................................... 21 United Kingdom...........................................................................................................21 Quality issues........................................................................................................................... 21 Codes of Conduct.................................................................................................................... 23 Sweden............................................................................................................................26 Quality issues........................................................................................................................... 26 Codes of Conduct.................................................................................................................... 26 Participants’ views, including professionals’ attitudes ......................................28 Ireland ............................................................................................................................28 Poland .............................................................................................................................28 United Kingdom...........................................................................................................28 Sweden............................................................................................................................29 After-care and healthcare outcomes.........................................................................29 Ireland ............................................................................................................................29 Poland .............................................................................................................................30 United Kingdom...........................................................................................................30 Sweden............................................................................................................................31 Tools to support communication in medical encounters ..................................32 Cyprus .............................................................................................................................32 Ireland ............................................................................................................................32 Poland .............................................................................................................................32 United Kingdom...........................................................................................................33 Sweden............................................................................................................................33 References to Part Three ..............................................................................................34 Part 4 – International comparisons...........................................................................36 Quality assurance of healthcare interpreters: international training and standards............................................................................................................................36 Healthcare interpreting research and effective practice...................................39 Deaf access to healthcare in the USA.........................................................................40 References to Part Four.................................................................................................42 Part 5 – Further reading................................................................................................46 3 PART 1 – BACKGROUND & CONTEXT Introduction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sign Language Typology Series
    SIGN LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY SERIES The Sign Language Typology Series is dedicated to the comparative study of sign languages around the world. Individual or collective works that systematically explore typological variation across sign languages are the focus of this series, with particular emphasis on undocumented, underdescribed and endangered sign languages. The scope of the series primarily includes cross-linguistic studies of grammatical domains across a larger or smaller sample of sign languages, but also encompasses the study of individual sign languages from a typological perspective and comparison between signed and spoken languages in terms of language modality, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to sign language typology. Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages Edited by Ulrike Zeshan Sign Language Typology Series No. 1 / Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages / Ulrike Zeshan (ed.) / Nijmegen: Ishara Press 2006. ISBN-10: 90-8656-001-6 ISBN-13: 978-90-8656-001-1 © Ishara Press Stichting DEF Wundtlaan 1 6525XD Nijmegen The Netherlands Fax: +31-24-3521213 email: [email protected] http://ishara.def-intl.org Cover design: Sibaji Panda Printed in the Netherlands First published 2006 Catalogue copy of this book available at Depot van Nederlandse Publicaties, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag (www.kb.nl/depot) To the deaf pioneers in developing countries who have inspired all my work Contents Preface........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Accessibility Assessment for Europe Region EUROPE
    ITUPublications International Telecommunication Union Europe 2021 ICT accessibility assessment for Europe region EUROPE copy Advance ICT accessibility assessment for Europe region accessibility assessment for Europe ICT ICT accessibility assessment for Europe region Acknowledgements The ICT accessibility assessment for the Europe region was developed by Dr Dušan Caf, Director of the Digitas Institute, Coordinator of the Digital Accessibility Platform, Senior Lecturer and ITU consultant in digital accessibility, under the guidance of Ms Roxana Widmer-Iliescu, Senior Coordinator (Digital Inclusion) and ITU-D Focal Point for ICT Accessibility, with valuable comments and suggestions received from Ms Inmaculada Placencia Porrero, Senior Expert on Disability and Inclusion from the European Commission, and Mr Ricardo Garcia Bahamonde, expert in ICT accessibility certified by the International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP). The report was prepared under the overall coordination of Mr Jaroslaw Ponder, Head of the ITU Office for Europe, within the scope of the ITU Regional Initiative for Europe on Accessibility,“ affordability and skills development for all, to ensure digital inclusion and sustainable development”. Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ITU concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific organizations, companies, products or services does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ITU in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Language Legislation in the European Union 4
    Sign Language Legislation in the European Union Mark Wheatley & Annika Pabsch European Union of the Deaf Brussels, Belgium 3 Sign Language Legislation in the European Union All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted by any person or entity, including internet search engines or retailers, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, scanning or by any information storage and retrieval system without the prior written permission of the authors. ISBN 978-90-816-3390-1 © European Union of the Deaf, September 2012. Printed at Brussels, Belgium. Design: Churchill’s I/S- www.churchills.dk This publication was sponsored by Significan’t Significan’t is a (Deaf and Sign Language led ) social business that was established in 2003 and its Managing Director, Jeff McWhinney, was the CEO of the British Deaf Association when it secured a verbal recognition of BSL as one of UK official languages by a Minister of the UK Government. SignVideo is committed to delivering the best service and support to its customers. Today SignVideo provides immediate access to high quality video relay service and video interpreters for health, public and voluntary services, transforming access and career prospects for Deaf people in employment and empowering Deaf entrepreneurs in their own businesses. www.signvideo.co.uk 4 Contents Welcome message by EUD President Berglind Stefánsdóttir ..................... 6 Foreword by Dr Ádám Kósa, MEP ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Cognition Animal Minds
    CogSci 2021 VIRTUAL Invited speakers Julia Fischer Onur Güntürkün COMPARATIVE Erich Jarvis COGNITION Friederike Range Cognitive Animals Invited panels Cognition of time Comparative and neural approaches to social cognition Towards comparative aesthetics Organizers Tecumseh Fitch Claus Lamm cognitivesciencesociety.org/ Helmut Leder cogsci-2021 Kristin Teßmar-Raible #CogSci2021 Program for the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 26 – 29 July 2021 Vienna, Austria Comparative Cognition Animal Minds Organizers: Tecumseh Fitch, Claus Lamm, Helmut Leder, Kristin Teßmar-Raible https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci-2021/ Dear Colleagues, Welcome to the 43rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society! This year’s conference brings together the latest research from all Cognitive Science and also highlights this year’s theme Comparative Cognition: Animal Minds. The program features four plenary speakers: Friederike Range (University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna), Onur Güntürkün (Ruhr University Bochum), Julia Fischer (University of Göttingen), and Erich Jarvis (The Rockefeller University). The keynotes and invited symposia showcase the broad spectrum of ideas that encompass the conference theme of comparative cognition. Further, the program includes the Rumelhart Prize keynote presentation by Susan Goldin-Meadow (University of Chicago), and symposia to celebrate the winner of the Elman Prize: Wei Ji Ma (New York University), the Heineken Award winner Robert Zatorre (McGill University), and the Robert J. Glushko Dissertation
    [Show full text]
  • Altaic Languages
    Altaic Languages Masaryk University Press Reviewed by Ivo T. Budil Václav Blažek in collaboration with Michal Schwarz and Ondřej Srba Altaic Languages History of research, survey, classification and a sketch of comparative grammar Masaryk University Press Brno 2019 Publication financed by the grant No. GA15-12215S of the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR) © 2019 Masaryk University Press ISBN 978-80-210-9321-8 ISBN 978-80-210-9322-5 (online : pdf) https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-9322-2019 5 Analytical Contents 0. Preface .................................................................. 9 1. History of recognition of the Altaic languages ............................... 15 1.1. History of descriptive and comparative research of the Turkic languages ..........15 1.1.1. Beginning of description of the Turkic languages . .15 1.1.2. The beginning of Turkic comparative studies ...........................21 1.1.3. Old Turkic language and script – discovery and development of research .....22 1.1.4. Turkic etymological dictionaries .....................................23 1.1.5. Turkic comparative grammars .......................................24 1.1.6. Syntheses of grammatical descriptions of the Turkic languages .............25 1.2. History of descriptive and comparative research of the Mongolic languages .......28 1.2.0. Bibliographic survey of Mongolic linguistics ...........................28 1.2.1. Beginning of description of the Mongolic languages .....................28 1.2.2. Standard Mongolic grammars and dictionaries ..........................31 1.2.3. Mongolic comparative and etymological dictionaries .....................32 1.2.4. Mongolic comparative grammars and grammatical syntheses...............33 1.3. History of descriptive and comparative research of the Tungusic languages ........33 1.3.0. Bibliographic survey of the Tungusic linguistics.........................33 1.3.1. Beginning of description of the Tungusic languages ......................34 1.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Word Order Parameter in Slovenian Sign Language Transitive, Ditransitive, Classifier and Locative Constructions
    Scuola Dottorale di Ateneo Graduate School Dottorato di ricerca in Scienze del Linguaggio Ciclo 28 Anno di discussione 2016 The word order parameter in Slovenian Sign Language Transitive, ditransitive, classifier and locative constructions SETTORE SCIENTIFICO DISCIPLINARE DI AFFERENZA: L-LIN/01 Tesi di Dottorato di Matic Pavliˇc,matricola 955992 Coordinatore del Dottorato Tutore del Dottorando Prof.ssa Alessandra Giorgi Prof.ssa Chiara Branchini To Mila Acknowledgements In this doctoral thesis, a minority language is described, which, to date, has received close to no attention by linguists. I like to imagine that this description will have a direct impact on the small community of SZJ signers. I hope that they will see it as a tool to research, understand and cherish their language. I will be happy if it will turn out to be useful in their daily lives. I am grateful to everybody that made my research possible and contributed to my decision to choose Slovenian Sign Language as a topic of my study. First of all, I would like to thank my parents, who brought me up, encouraged my curiosity and always supported me in every way possible. Secondly, this research was supported by the Scholarship for Slovenian citizens for postgraduate study abroad number 11010-716/2012, and partially supported by COST Action IS1006 summer school grant IS1006-060614-044777, COST Action IS1006 Short Term Scientific Mission grant ECOST-STSM- IS1006-271014-051446 and Ca’ Foscari internal funds for PhD mobility. Although the financial aspect is not the one that matters the most, it nevertheless represents a foundation. That is why I would like to thank all the administrative workers that helped me with the applications and the reports.
    [Show full text]
  • 002/20 Rechtliche Stellung Der Gebärdensprache in Europäischen
    Wissenschaftliche Dienste Sachstand Rechtliche Stellung der Gebärdensprache in europäischen Staaten © 2020 Deutscher Bundestag WD 10 - 3000 - 002/20 Wissenschaftliche Dienste Sachstand Seite 2 WD 10 - 3000 - 002/20 Rechtliche Stellung der Gebärdensprache in europäischen Staaten Aktenzeichen: WD 10 - 3000 - 002/20 Abschluss der Arbeit: 27. Februar 2020 Fachbereich: WD 10: Kultur, Medien und Sport Die Wissenschaftlichen Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages unterstützen die Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages bei ihrer mandatsbezogenen Tätigkeit. Ihre Arbeiten geben nicht die Auffassung des Deutschen Bundestages, eines sei- ner Organe oder der Bundestagsverwaltung wieder. Vielmehr liegen sie in der fachlichen Verantwortung der Verfasse- rinnen und Verfasser sowie der Fachbereichsleitung. Arbeiten der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste geben nur den zum Zeit- punkt der Erstellung des Textes aktuellen Stand wieder und stellen eine individuelle Auftragsarbeit für einen Abge- ordneten des Bundestages dar. Die Arbeiten können der Geheimschutzordnung des Bundestages unterliegende, ge- schützte oder andere nicht zur Veröffentlichung geeignete Informationen enthalten. Eine beabsichtigte Weitergabe oder Veröffentlichung ist vorab dem jeweiligen Fachbereich anzuzeigen und nur mit Angabe der Quelle zulässig. Der Fach- bereich berät über die dabei zu berücksichtigenden Fragen. Wissenschaftliche Dienste Sachstand Seite 3 WD 10 - 3000 - 002/20 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 4 2. Supranationaler Kontext der Gebärdensprache 5 2.1. UN-Konvention über die Rechte von Menschen mit Behinderungen 5 2.2. Gebärdensprache auf europäischer Ebene 5 2.3. Gebärdensprachen in EU-Mitgliedsländern und weiteren europäischen Staaten 6 3. Landesspezifische Gebärdensprachen in europäischen Ländern – Tabellarischer Überblick 8 4. Offizielle Anerkennung der Gebärdensprache in EU- Mitgliedstaaten – Tabellarischer Überblick 13 5. Rechtliche Anerkennung der Gebärdensprache in weiteren europäischen Ländern – Tabellarischer Überblick 22 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication In
    CLT0010.1177/0265659018755523Child Language Teaching and TherapyPampoulou et al. 755523research-article2018 Article Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2018, Vol. 34(1) 5 –21 The use of augmentative and © The Author(s) 2018 Reprints and permissions: alternative communication sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659018755523DOI: 10.1177/0265659018755523 in Cyprus: Findings from a journals.sagepub.com/home/clt preliminary survey Eliada Pampoulou, Eleni Theodorou and Kakia Petinou Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos, Cyprus Abstract Whilst augmentative and alternative communication has been used for over sixty years across many countries, in Cyprus it remains underdeveloped. The current study seeks to investigate the current AAC practices in Cyprus. Data were collected through electronically distributed questionnaires to all registered speech and language therapists (n = 330), contacted by the Cyprus Speech Therapy Association. The questionnaire comprised 12 questions, which were categorized into three sections: background information (educational level and clinical experience), training undergone (during or after completion of tertiary education) and participants’ AAC practices (caseload, assessment and intervention). The findings from the analysis of the returned data (n = 59) reveal that training provision on augmentative and alternative communication has positively influenced practice. Most of the participants received training in the specific field during their bachelor’s degree, rather than during later education. Life-long training on different language systems (including different assistive technology tools, such as symbols and talking products as well as methods such as the Picture Exchange Communication System) also played a pivotal role in their work. Regarding the assessment process, the findings show that whilst there are a number of standardized language assessment tools, the participants relied heavily on non-standardized tools and/or their clinical judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Plataforma De Boas-Vindas Para Estudantes
    Inclusão Digital em Cooperação com os Utilizadores para Estratégias Web: Plataforma de Boas-vindas para Estudantes VALÉRIE MOREIRA DUARTE Outubro de 2020 Digital Inclusion in Cooperation with its Users for Web Strategies Students Welcome Platform Valérie Moreira Duarte Dissertation to obtain the Master’s Degree in Informatics Engineering, Area of Expertise in Graphic Systems and Multimedia Advisor: Paula Maria De Sá Oliveira Escudeiro Co-advisor: Ana Margarida Sousa Júlio Mendes Barata Porto, October 2020 ii Resumo A informação tem um grande impacto na vida dos cidadãos, como tal a qualidade, disponibilidade e forma de acesso condicionam o conhecimento e as oportunidades no futuro de cada indivíduo. Qualquer contribuição para minimizar as barreiras no acesso à informação promove a equidade. Nos dias que correm, o conteúdo da Internet ainda não está adaptado às pessoas com deficiências auditivas e visuais. O mesmo aplica-se à maioria dos websites das instituições de ensino superior, como é o caso do website do Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto (ISEP). Os websites institucionais têm a obrigação de disponibilizar a informação equitativamente entre os estudantes. Mesmo tendo em conta que as instituições de ensino superior dispõem de um espaço físico dedicado ao apoio e integração dos estudantes, a ajuda ou informação requerida não é normalmente disponibilizada atempadamente. O objetivo desta dissertação é apresentar uma proposta para a melhoria da integração dos estudantes do ensino superior através do desenvolvimento de uma plataforma web que promove a equidade. A plataforma web irá contribuir para a resolução de problemas relacionados com a integração e a ansiedade dos estudantes, ao fornecer meios que facilitam a comunicação entre os estudantes, de forma a que possam encontrar colegas predispostos a ajudar.
    [Show full text]
  • Signgram Blueprint
    SignGram Blueprint SignGram Blueprint A Guide to Sign Language Grammar Writing Edited by Josep Quer, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau, and Markus Steinbach (Scientific Directors) With the collaboration of Brendan Costello and Rannveig Sverrisdóttir Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union ISBN 978-1-5015-1570-5 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-5015-1180-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-1608-5 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2017 Josep Quer, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau, and Markus Steinbach, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Typesetting: Compuscript Ltd., Shannon, Ireland Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany Introduction: Letter to the grammar writer The SignGram Blueprint is a tool designed to guide language specialists and linguists as they write a reference grammar of a sign language. This tool consists of two main components: the Checklist and the Manual. The Checklist contains a list of linguistic constructions and phenomena that a sign language grammar should contain.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf Identity Construction: a Case Study”
    98 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Psychologica IV Reviewer prof. DSW dr hab. Małgorzata Sekułowicz © Copyright by Wydawnictwo Naukowe UP, Krakow 2011 Editorial Board ) š prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Budrewicz (Pedagogical University, Krakow, Poland prof. dr Ingrida Baranauskienė ( iauliai University, Lithuania) prof. dr Francesc Cuxart (The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain) prof. dr hab. Jan Kaiser (Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland) prof. dr hab. Maria Kielar-Turska (Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland) ) prof. UW dr hab. Maria Ledzińska (University of Warsaw, Poland) prof. UP dr hab. Krzysztof Mudyń (Pedagogical University, Krakow, Poland prof. dr hab. Władysława Pilecka (Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland) prof. UR dr hab. Mieczysław Radochoński (University of Rzeszow, Poland) prof. dr Margaret Winzer (University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada) Editorial Staff ) SEditor-in-Chief Joanna Kossewska (Pedagogical University, Krakow, Poland ) Volume Editor Miloň Potměšil (Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic) cientific Secretary Karolina Pietras (Pedagogical University, Krakow, Poland Language Editor Anna Tyborowska (Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands) ISSN 1689-9903 Publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe UP PL 30–084 Kraków, ul. Podchorążych 2 tel./fax 12 662–63–83, tel. 12 662–67–56 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.wydawnictwoup.pl Print Zespół Poligraficzny UP, zam. 72/11 Introduction The presented issue is devoted to psychological problems of disability in the context of school as well as cultural inclusion. The papers are based on different international experiences, which should be very interesting for Readers and can enable a comparison of both similarities and differences in the political and cultural backgrounds. Authors from different European as well Asian and American Universities were invited to present their research results and theoretical outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography on Deafness 2007 – 2018 December 2018 Edition Alphabetical by Author
    BIBLIOGRAPHY ON DEAFNESS 2007 – 2018 DECEMBER 2018 EDITION ALPHABETICAL BY AUTHOR COMPILED BY: DAVID F. CONWAY, ED.D. ASSOCIATE DEAN EMERITUS COLLEGE OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA 12.31.2018 This document is a service of the Division of Communication, Language, and Deaf/Hard of Hearing Permission to copy not required - distribution encouraged Page 1 Bibliography on Deafness – Alphabetical by Author Updated 12/31/18 SECTION 1: ALPHABETICAL BY AUTHOR -A- Aaron, K. A., Kari, E., Friedman, R. A., & Niparko, J. K. (2016). Cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants for children: Surgical considerations. In L. S. Eisenberg (Ed.), Clinical management of children with cochlear implants (2nd ed., pp. 69–103). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing. ISBN: 9781597567237 Aceti, K. J., & Wang, Y. (2010). The teaching and learning of multimeaning words within a metacognitively based curriculum. American Annals of the Deaf, 155(2), 118-123. doi:10.1353/aad.20doi:10.0010 Adam, R. (2015). Standardization of sign languages. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 432-445. doi:10.1353/sls.2015.0015 Adi-Bensaid, L., & Most, T. (2009). The acquisition of the prosodic word by children with hearing loss using a cochlear implants. The Volta Review, 109(1), 5-31. Retrieved from https://www.agbell.org/Portals/26/VoltaReview/109-1.pdf Adi-Bensaid, L., Michael, R., Most, T., & Gali-Cinamon, R. (2012). Parental and spousal self-efficacy of young adults who are deaf or hard of hearing: Relationship to speech intelligibility. The Volta Review, 112(2), 113-130. Retrieved from https://www.agbell.org/Portals/26/VoltaReview/112- 2.pdf Adunka, O.
    [Show full text]