DOCSLIB.ORG

Sign Language Legislation in the European Union 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sign Language Legislation in the European Union 4 Sign Language Legislation in the European Union Mark Wheatley & Annika Pabsch European Union of the Deaf Brussels, Belgium 3 Sign Language Legislation in the European Union All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted by any person or entity, including internet search engines or retailers, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, scanning or by any information storage and retrieval system without the prior written permission of the authors. ISBN 978-90-816-3390-1 © European Union of the Deaf, September 2012. Printed at Brussels, Belgium. Design: Churchill’s I/S- www.churchills.dk This publication was sponsored by Significan’t Significan’t is a (Deaf and Sign Language led ) social business that was established in 2003 and its Managing Director, Jeff McWhinney, was the CEO of the British Deaf Association when it secured a verbal recognition of BSL as one of UK official languages by a Minister of the UK Government. SignVideo is committed to delivering the best service and support to its customers. Today SignVideo provides immediate access to high quality video relay service and video interpreters for health, public and voluntary services, transforming access and career prospects for Deaf people in employment and empowering Deaf entrepreneurs in their own businesses. www.signvideo.co.uk 4 Contents Welcome message by EUD President Berglind Stefánsdóttir ..................... 6 Foreword by Dr Ádám Kósa, MEP ................................................................. 7 European Union of the Deaf (EUD) ............................................................... 8 Authors’ Biographies ........................................................................................ 9 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................ 10 Abbreviations ...................................................................................................11 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 12 2. Sign Languages ........................................................................................ 12 a. Sign Languages as Natural Languages ................................. 13 b. National Sign Languages ........................................................ 14 c. International Sign ..................................................................... 15 3. Sign Language as Mother Tongue ......................................................... 16 4. Sign Language Interpreting in Europe ................................................. 18 a. Definitions ................................................................................. 18 b. Ratios .......................................................................................... 18 c. Guidelines ................................................................................. 21 5. Deaf People as Right Holders ................................................................ 21 a. Human Rights .......................................................................... 22 b. Minority Rights ........................................................................ 23 c. Linguistic Human Rights ....................................................... 24 6. Sign Language Legislation at Supranational Level ............................ 26 a. UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ... 27 b. European Union ....................................................................... 29 i. Sign Language Resolutions ................................ 29 ii. Mobility Report & Brussels Declaration ........... 30 iii. European Accessibility Act ................................. 31 iv. Written Declaration on the Need for Accessible 112 Emergency Services ................... 32 v. Anti-discrimination Directive ............................ 33 c. Council of Europe ..................................................................... 35 i. Recommendations ............................................... 35 ii. Publications .......................................................... 36 5 Sign Language Legislation in the European Union 7. Sign Language Legislation in the EU .................................................... 37 a. Austria ........................................................................................ 38 b. Belgium ...................................................................................... 41 i. Flanders ................................................................. 42 ii. Wallonia ................................................................ 44 c. Bulgaria ...................................................................................... 46 d. Cyprus ........................................................................................ 48 e. Czech Republic ......................................................................... 49 f. Denmark .................................................................................... 51 g. Estonia ........................................................................................ 54 h. Finland ....................................................................................... 56 i. France ......................................................................................... 61 j. Germany .................................................................................... 62 k. Greece ......................................................................................... 65 l. Hungary ..................................................................................... 67 m. Ireland ........................................................................................ 69 n. Italy ............................................................................................. 71 o. Latvia .......................................................................................... 73 p. Lithuania .................................................................................... 75 q. Luxembourg .............................................................................. 76 r. Malta ........................................................................................... 79 s. The Netherlands ....................................................................... 81 t. Poland ........................................................................................ 83 u. Portugal ...................................................................................... 85 v. Romania ..................................................................................... 88 w. Slovakia ...................................................................................... 90 x. Slovenia ...................................................................................... 93 y. Spain ........................................................................................... 94 z. Sweden ....................................................................................... 96 aa. United Kingdom ....................................................................... 98 8. Sign Language Legislation Worldwide............................................... 101 a. Bosnia & Herzegovina ........................................................... 102 b. Iceland ...................................................................................... 103 c. New Zealand ........................................................................... 105 d. Norway .................................................................................... 106 e. Switzerland ............................................................................. 107 f. Uganda .................................................................................... 109 9. Outlook ....................................................................................................110 10. Bibliography ............................................................................................111 6 Contents 11. Appendix - Sign Language Legislation (original texts) a. Austria ...................................................................................... 124 b. Belgium i. Flanders ............................................................... 126 ii. Wallonia .............................................................. 142 c. Bosnia & Herzegovina ........................................................... 154 d. Bulgaria .................................................................................... 162 e. Cyprus ...................................................................................... 174 f. Czech Republic ....................................................................... 177 g. Denmark .................................................................................. 184 h. Estonia ...................................................................................... 199 i. Finland ..................................................................................... 201 j. France ....................................................................................... 217 k. Germany .................................................................................. 222 l. Greece ....................................................................................... 232 m. Hungary ................................................................................... 236 n. Iceland .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sign Language Typology Series
    SIGN LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY SERIES The Sign Language Typology Series is dedicated to the comparative study of sign languages around the world. Individual or collective works that systematically explore typological variation across sign languages are the focus of this series, with particular emphasis on undocumented, underdescribed and endangered sign languages. The scope of the series primarily includes cross-linguistic studies of grammatical domains across a larger or smaller sample of sign languages, but also encompasses the study of individual sign languages from a typological perspective and comparison between signed and spoken languages in terms of language modality, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to sign language typology. Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages Edited by Ulrike Zeshan Sign Language Typology Series No. 1 / Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages / Ulrike Zeshan (ed.) / Nijmegen: Ishara Press 2006. ISBN-10: 90-8656-001-6 ISBN-13: 978-90-8656-001-1 © Ishara Press Stichting DEF Wundtlaan 1 6525XD Nijmegen The Netherlands Fax: +31-24-3521213 email: [email protected] http://ishara.def-intl.org Cover design: Sibaji Panda Printed in the Netherlands First published 2006 Catalogue copy of this book available at Depot van Nederlandse Publicaties, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag (www.kb.nl/depot) To the deaf pioneers in developing countries who have inspired all my work Contents Preface........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Inclusive Education in Europe and in the Republic of Moldova: Reasonable Accommodation, Access to Education and Non-Discrimination
    Study on inclusive education in Europe and in the Republic of Moldova: reasonable accommodation, access to education and non-discrimination http://partnership-governance-eu.coe.int Partnership for Good Governance Parteneriat pentru buna guvernare The joint European Union and Council of Europe project „Supporting national efforts for prevention and combating discrimination in the Republic of Moldova”, part of the Partnership for Good Governance programme Study on inclusive education in Europe and in the Republic of Moldova: reasonable accommodation, access to education and non-discrimination Prepared by Frédérique Ast, Council of Europe consultant Chisinau, 2018 1 This document has been produced as part of the project „Supporting national efforts for prevention and combating discrimination in the Republic of Moldova” co-funded by the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of either party. © Council of Europe 2018. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Content ______________________________________________________ Acknowledgments 4 CHAPTER I: THE INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS 6 I. The UN framework 6 II. The European standards 8 A. EU Law 8 B. The Council of Europe Conventions 9 C. Selected European Court of Human Rights and European Committee of Social Rights’s Case-lawă 11 CHAPTER II: BEST PRACTICES IN EUROPE 15 I. AUSTRIA 16 II. BELGIUM 16 III. CZECH REPUBLIC 17 IV. FINLAND 18 V. FRANCE 18 VI. GERMANY 19 VII. LITHUANIA 20 VIII. MONTENEGRO 21 IX.PORTUGAL 21 X. SLOVAKIA 23 XI. SWEDEN 23 XII. UNITED KINGDOM 24 CHAPTER III: THE SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 26 I.
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Accessibility Assessment for Europe Region EUROPE
    ITUPublications International Telecommunication Union Europe 2021 ICT accessibility assessment for Europe region EUROPE copy Advance ICT accessibility assessment for Europe region accessibility assessment for Europe ICT ICT accessibility assessment for Europe region Acknowledgements The ICT accessibility assessment for the Europe region was developed by Dr Dušan Caf, Director of the Digitas Institute, Coordinator of the Digital Accessibility Platform, Senior Lecturer and ITU consultant in digital accessibility, under the guidance of Ms Roxana Widmer-Iliescu, Senior Coordinator (Digital Inclusion) and ITU-D Focal Point for ICT Accessibility, with valuable comments and suggestions received from Ms Inmaculada Placencia Porrero, Senior Expert on Disability and Inclusion from the European Commission, and Mr Ricardo Garcia Bahamonde, expert in ICT accessibility certified by the International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP). The report was prepared under the overall coordination of Mr Jaroslaw Ponder, Head of the ITU Office for Europe, within the scope of the ITU Regional Initiative for Europe on Accessibility,“ affordability and skills development for all, to ensure digital inclusion and sustainable development”. Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ITU concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific organizations, companies, products or services does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ITU in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signing Space for the Synthesis of Directional Verbs in NGT
    The signing space for the synthesis of directional verbs in NGT Shani E. Mende-Gillings Layout: typeset by the author using LATEX. Cover illustration: Unknown artist The signing space for the synthesis of directional verbs in NGT Shani E. Mende-Gillings 11319836 Bachelor thesis Credits: 18 EC Bachelor Kunstmatige Intelligentie University of Amsterdam Faculty of Science Science Park 904 1098 XH Amsterdam Supervisor dr. F. Roelofsen Institute for Logic, Language and Computation Faculty of Science University of Amsterdam Science Park 107 1098 XG Amsterdam 26 June 2020 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Floris Roelofsen for his guidance during this project. I am also very grateful to John Glauert and Richard Kennaway for proving valuable insight into SiGML and the JASigning software. Special thanks go to Inge Zwitserlood, Onno Crasborn and Johan Ros for providing the database of encoded NGT signs, without which this project would not have been possible. Last, but not least, I would also like to thank Marijke Scheffener for providing evaluation material and valuable feedback on the program. Preface This paper describes an individual contribution to a larger project executed in close collaboration with [1] and [2]. The first parts of these three papers describe the overall project and were jointly written, making them largely identical. Section 1.2 describes the global research question, and sections 2 and 3 provide the- oretical context and set up a hypothesis. Section 5.1.1 shows the overall program created, including the components of the other projects, and section 5.2.1 evaluates the result. These previously mentioned chap- ters and sections have been written in joint collaboration with [1] and [2] An introduction to and motivation for the overall project are provided in section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Information Using a Sign Language Avatar Individual Travel Assistance for Passengers with Special Needs in Public Transport
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institute of Transport Research:Publications STRATEGIES Travel Assistance Photo: Helmer Photo: Passenger information using a sign language avatar Individual travel assistance for passengers with special needs in public transport Public transport, passenger information, travel assistance, information and communication technology, reduced mobility, accessibility, inclusion Public transport operators are legally obliged to ensure equal access to transportation services. This includes equal access to information and communication related to those services. Deaf passengers mostly prefer to communicate in sign language. For this reason, the specific needs of deaf and hard-of- hearing passengers still are not adequately addressed – despite the tremendous efforts public transport operators have put in providing accessible communication services to their passengers. This article describes a novel approach to passenger information in sign language based on the automatic translation of natural (written) language text into sign language. This includes the use of a sign language avatar to display the information to deaf and hard-of-hearing passengers. Authors: Lars Schnieder, Georg Tschare ublic transport operators provide nature and causes of disruptions [2]. The tion on the Rights of Persons with Disabili- real-time passenger information passenger information system may be used ties oblige all ratifying countries to ensure via electronic information systems both physically within a transportation hub that persons with disabilities have the in order to keep passengers up to as well as remotely via mobile devices used opportunity to live independently and par- Pdate about the current status of the public by the passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Classification in Sign Language Corpora with Deep Neural Networks
    Sign Classification in Sign Language Corpora with Deep Neural Networks Lionel Pigou, Mieke Van Herreweghe, Joni Dambre Ghent University flionel.pigou, mieke.vanherreweghe, [email protected] Abstract Automatic and unconstrained sign language recognition (SLR) in image sequences remains a challenging problem. The variety of signers, backgrounds, sign executions and signer positions makes the development of SLR systems very challenging. Current methods try to alleviate this complexity by extracting engineered features to detect hand shapes, hand trajectories and facial expressions as an intermediate step for SLR. Our goal is to approach SLR based on feature learning rather than feature engineering. We tackle SLR using the recent advances in the domain of deep learning with deep neural networks. The problem is approached by classifying isolated signs from the Corpus VGT (Flemish Sign Language Corpus) and the Corpus NGT (Dutch Sign Language Corpus). Furthermore, we investigate cross-domain feature learning to boost the performance to cope with the fewer Corpus VGT annotations. Keywords: sign language recognition, deep learning, neural networks 1. Introduction In previous work (Pigou et al., 2015), we showed that deep neural networks are very successful for gesture recognition SLR systems have many different use cases: corpus anno- and gesture spotting in spatiotemporal data. Our developed tation, in hospitals, as a personal sign language learning system is able to recognize 20 different Italian gestures (i.e., assistant or translating daily conversations between signers emblems). We achieved a classification accuracy of 97.23% and non-signers to name a few. Unfortunately, unconstrained in the Chalearn 2014 Looking At People gesture spotting SLR remains a big challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Gesture and Sign Language Recognition with Temporal Residual Networks
    Gesture and Sign Language Recognition with Temporal Residual Networks Lionel Pigou, Mieke Van Herreweghe and Joni Dambre Ghent University {lionel.pigou, mieke.vanherreweghe, joni.dambre}@ugent.be Abstract SLR using recurrent CNNs [6]. A task that is closely related to SLR is gesture recog- Gesture and sign language recognition in a continuous nition. Deep neural networks have proven to be success- video stream is a challenging task, especially with a large ful for this problem, given a small vocabulary (20 gestures) vocabulary. In this work, we approach this as a framewise [22, 30] and/or with a multi-modal approach [24, 18]. classification problem. We tackle it using temporal con- In this work, we investigate large vocabulary gesture volutions and recent advances in the deep learning field recognition and SLR using deep neural networks with up- like residual networks, batch normalization and exponen- to-date architectures, regularization techniques and training tial linear units (ELUs). The models are evaluated on methods. To achieve this, we approach the problem as a three different datasets: the Dutch Sign Language Corpus continuous framewise classification task, where the tempo- (Corpus NGT), the Flemish Sign Language Corpus (Cor- ral locations of gestures and signs are not given during eval- pus VGT) and the ChaLearn LAP RGB-D Continuous Ges- uation. The models are tested on the Dutch Sign Language ture Dataset (ConGD). We achieve a 73.5% top-10 accu- Corpus (Corpus NGT) [4, 5], the Flemish Sign Language racy for 100 signs with the Corpus NGT, 56.4% with the Corpus (Corpus VGT) [27] and the ChaLearn LAP RGB-D Corpus VGT and a mean Jaccard index of 0.316 with the Continuous Gesture Dataset (ConGD) [28].
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Symbol Base Translation and Synthesis of Czech Sign Speech
    SPECOM'2006, St. Petersburg, 25-29 June 2006 3D Symbol Base Translation and Synthesis of Czech Sign Speech Zdenekˇ Krnoul,ˇ Jakub Kanis, Milosˇ Zeleznˇ y,´ Ludekˇ Muller¨ and Petr C´ısarˇ University of West Bohemia, Department of Cybernetics Univerzitn´ı 8, Plzen,ˇ 306 14, Czech Republic fzdkrnoul, jkanis, zelezny, muller, [email protected] Abstract synthesis of animation makes the parsing of symbols and also uses geometric model of human for the final rendering. Anima- This paper presents primary results of translation spoken tion technique enables the complete articulation of all fingers Czech to Signed Czech and a synthesis of signs by the com- and both arms. puter animation. The synthesis of animation employs a sym- bolic notation. An automatic process of synthesis generates the articulation of hands from this notation. The translation system 2. Related works of translation and is built on the statistical ground. For the notation of the new synthesis systems signs, the graphic editor is designed. In principle, there are two ways how to solve the synthesis of 1. Introduction sign language by the computer. The first of them can be called data driven synthesis and the second synthesis from the sym- The barrier in the communication between hearing and deaf bolic formulation. The principles of the translation system can people should make everyday complication. The problem is that be divided in similar way. We can either implement the trans- hearing people have bad familiarity of sign language and deaf lation of written word to sequences of signs by set of linguistic with the structure of spoken language.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Cards | Joshua Project
    Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Abkhaz in Ukraine Abor in India Population: 1,500 Population: 1,700 World Popl: 307,600 World Popl: 1,700 Total Countries: 6 Total Countries: 1 People Cluster: Caucasus People Cluster: South Asia Tribal - other Main Language: Abkhaz Main Language: Adi Main Religion: Non-Religious Main Religion: Unknown Status: Minimally Reached Status: Minimally Reached Evangelicals: 1.00% Evangelicals: Unknown % Chr Adherents: 20.00% Chr Adherents: 16.36% Scripture: New Testament Scripture: Complete Bible www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net Source: Apsuwara - Wikimedia "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Achuar Jivaro in Ecuador Achuar Jivaro in Peru Population: 7,200 Population: 400 World Popl: 7,600 World Popl: 7,600 Total Countries: 2 Total Countries: 2 People Cluster: South American Indigenous People Cluster: South American Indigenous Main Language: Achuar-Shiwiar Main Language: Achuar-Shiwiar Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Status: Minimally Reached Status: Minimally Reached Evangelicals: 1.00% Evangelicals: 2.00% Chr Adherents: 14.00% Chr Adherents: 15.00% Scripture: New Testament Scripture: New Testament www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net Source: Gina De Leon Source: Gina De Leon "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Adi in India Adi Gallong in India
    [Show full text]
  • Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation Through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Linguistics ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2009 Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds Recommended Citation Wilkinson, Erin. "Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology." (2009). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/40 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TYPOLOGY OF SIGNED LANGUAGES: DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY BY ERIN LAINE WILKINSON B.A., Language Studies, Wellesley College, 1999 M.A., Linguistics, Gallaudet University, 2001 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Linguistics The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2009 ©2009, Erin Laine Wilkinson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION To my mother iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to Barbara Pennacchi for kick starting me on my dissertation by giving me a room at her house, cooking me dinner, and making Italian coffee in Rome during November 2007. Your endless support, patience, and thoughtful discussions are gratefully taken into my heart, and I truly appreciate what you have done for me. I heartily acknowledge Dr. William Croft, my advisor, for continuing to encourage me through the long number of months writing and rewriting these chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Jampaper 3./Iv./2009 95 Creating Equal Opportunities
    JAMPAPER 3./IV./2009 CREATING EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES WITH A HUNGARIAN-AUSTRIAN MULTIMEDIA SIGN LANGUAGE DICTIONARY Závoti Józsefné1, Katona György2 1,2 University of West Hungary Benedek Elek Faculty of Pedagogy [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract The aim of the research and development was to create a multimedia communication tool and accessibility that helps the sign language acquisition of hearing impaired people. Another aim was to compile a common Hungarian - German digital dictionary of sign language used in a foreign language area (Austria) and in Hungary. The digital dictionary has been developed by sign language experts, specialists in surdopedagogy and information specialists from both language areas. A sign research was carried out in both countries to record the currently used signs that correspond to the selected vocabulary. Researchers of NYME (University of West Hungary) concentrated on the signs used by local (West-Transdanubian) deaf and hard of hearing people, while the Austrian partner (Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt) employed the Austrian standardized signs. Our digital dictionary (www.omaa.fullnet.hu) also functions as a German-Hungarian, Hungarian-German dictionary as the menu is available both in German and Hungarian languages. The sign languages used in the two countries are simultaneously shown on the display in moving pictures. According to regulations sign language is naturally presented by deaf people in the videos. By watching these motion pictures the user has the opportunity to imitate, acquire and even compare the signs. The dictionary contains the sign of more than one thousand words in a way that etymological explanations are added to all words/signs in both languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing an Online Community for Special Education in Bulgaria
    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year Establishing an online community for special education in Bulgaria Robert Raley Peterson University of Wollongong Peterson, Robert R, Establishing an online community for special education in Bulgaria, PhD thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, 2009. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/802 This paper is posted at Research Online. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/802 Establishing an online community for special education in Bulgaria Robert Raley Peterson B.S. Cornell University A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy from the University of Wollongong Faculty of Education January 2009 Abstract The purpose of this study was to apply existing design principles for the creation of successful communities of practice (CoPs) to the development of a new online community with the aim of (1) exploring the practice of special education in Bulgaria and (2) evaluating the extent and ways in which the online community supports the practice. Research and development was framed by the design-based research approach. The study was organized into three phases: needs assessment, formative evaluation, and effective- ness evaluation. Four versions of the online community were created: prototype, alpha, beta, and final. Qualitative data were collected from personal interviews and discussions held on the online community website. Quantitative data were collected from website usage logs. Mixed data were collected from web-based questionnaires and surveys and expert consul- tation and usability evaluation sessions. Mixed-method studies of this nature are often described as following an exploratory research design.
    [Show full text]