DOCSLIB.ORG

MEMORANDUM TO: the Transportation Commission FROM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MEMORANDUM TO: the Transportation Commission FROM 2829 W. Howard Place, Ste. 569 Denver, CO 80204-2305 MEMORANDUM TO: The Transportation Commission FROM: Herman Stockinger and Jennifer Uebelher DATE: August 20, 2020 SUBJECT: Ports-to-Plains Purpose The Ports-to-Plains is “a grassroots alliance of communities and businesses whose mission is to advocate for a robust international transportation infrastructure to promote economic security and prosperity throughout North America's energy and agricultural heartland including Mexico to Canada.” The purpose of this presentation is to provide the Commission with an overview of the High Priority Corridors in Colorado; the CO-71 Truck Freight Diversion Feasibility Study; the 2018 Movement of Permitted Loads in Colorado; the Texas Ports-to-Plains Interstate Feasibility Study and to discuss the Future Interstate Designation. Action No action is requested at this time. Background History of Ports-to-Plains Alliance (excerpt from https://www.portstoplains.com) The inception of Ports-to-Plains came about in the mid-90’s, when elected officials and civic leaders from Lubbock, Texas wanted to improve U.S. 87/287 to the north and south of U.S. Interstate 27 between Lubbock and Amarillo, Texas in order to capture the economic benefits of trade. With interstates in the U.S. predominantly going east and west, there was a growing need for additional north/south corridors to support increasing trade opportunities. Through reaching out to civic leaders and elected officials from other communities, a base support group comprised of cities, counties, chambers and economic development organizations founded the Ports-to-Plains Trade Corridor Coalition. In 1998, the Ports-to-Plains Trade Corridor was granted its federal designation in the TEA-21 reauthorization bill as a high priority corridor from Laredo, Texas to Denver, Colorado via U.S. Interstate 27. In the 2001 appropriations bill, the route was approved through Texas, and then in 2002 the remainder of the route through New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Colorado was approved and signed by President George W. Bush in an independent bill. Later that same year (2002), the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) received a congressional appropriation of $1.7 million for the completion of a Corridor Development and Management Plan to identify needed improvements and actions necessary to create a modern trade corridor to enhance freight movement and promote economic development. TxDOT later transferred those funds to the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to manage the development of the plan. 2829 W. Howard Place Denver, CO 80204-2305 P 303.757.9772 www.codot.gov The four Ports-to-Plains states matched the federal funding with a total of $340,000 with each state’s contribution proportional to corridor mileage within that state. A steering committee composed of one representative each from Colorado, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Texas, guided the completion of this plan and coordinated with the Federal Highway Administration throughout the process. The Ports-to-Plains Development and Management Plan was completed in late 2004 and provided a blueprint of priorities and steps to improve the corridor as well as a tool for securing funding for corridor development. In 2008, the Ports-to-Plains Trade Corridor attained its goal of reaching to the Canada border by developing a partnership with two additional U.S. federal high priority corridors, the Heartland Expressway and Theodore Roosevelt Expressway. The three corridors together make up a 2300- plus mile economic development corridor, linking ten U.S. States to Canada and Mexico is known today as the PORTS-TO-PLAINS ALLIANCE. In 2009, the Government of Alberta joined as a member of the Ports-to-Plains Alliance in order to strengthen its trade relations with local and state government leaders in the ten Alliance states as well as to address the challenges and opportunities common to all the communities in the Ports-to- Plains region. The Ports-to-Plains Alliance also works closely with the Eastern Alberta Trade Corridor (EATC), a major economic development initiative underway that is led by three Regional Economic Development Alliances (REDAs) Alberta HUB, the Battle River Alliance for Economic Development and the Palliser Economic Partnership. The EATC provides access to the Alberta Oil Sands, which ranks third after Venezuela and Saudi Arabia in terms of proven recoverable global crude oil reserves. The Ports-to-Plains Alliance continues to explore opportunities in Mexico, working with local, state, and federal leaders who have made improving the Mexican highway system that connects to the Alliance Corridor a top priority in order to provide more modern and efficient infrastructure throughout several states in Mexico as well as to its western seaports. The road is still the core mission of the Alliance; but that mission and the organization through which we execute it, enables us to offer powerful support for sound economic policy in the industry sectors upon which our communities depend. Heightened awareness of the roles of energy and agriculture in the destiny of North American communities has never been higher - including growing concern about the energy, agriculture and other commodity sectors that, for many Corridor communities, offer hope for new prosperity and renewed economic development. Next Steps To promote economic security and prosperity throughout America’s energy and agricultural heartland, it is critical that the infrastructure is upgraded and modernized to meet the needs of trade and economic activity. Attachment Ports-to-Plains Presentation 2829 W. Howard Place Denver, CO 80204-2305 P 303.757.9772 www.codot.gov Ports-to-Plains Update Freight Committee of the Colorado Transportation Commission August 20, 2020 Joe Kiely Vice President of Operations Ports-to-Plains Alliance Overview of the High Priority Corridors Overview of the High Priority Corridors Heartland Expressway Designated 1992 Denver to Rapid City via Scottsbluff, NE Overview of the High Ports-to-Plains Designated 1998 Priority Texas-Mexico Corridors Border at Laredo to Denver Via I-27 Overview of the High Priority Corridors Theodore Roosevelt Expressway Designated 2005 U.S.-Canada Border to Rapid City via Willison The Heartland Expressway is CO Highway 71 between Limon and the Colorado- Nebraska state line and I-76 between Denver and Brush. The Ports-to-Plains Corridor is U.S. Highway 287 between the Colorado-Oklahoma state line and Limon and I-70 between Limon and I-25 at Denver. CO-71 Truck Freight Diversion Feasibility Study (published by CDOT Region 4) CO-71 Truck Freight Diversion Feasibility Study Study Area CO-71 Truck Freight Diversion Feasibility Study With a long-term vision of CO 71 as a four-lane highway, whether with a center turn lane (expressway) or a divided highway (i.e. future Vision interstate), the corridor would be able to accommodate a higher volume of traffic and serve as a stronger connector for the freight industry and general vehicular travel. • Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and CO-71 Truck Freight Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT) from the National Truck Freight Travel Diversion Feasibility Demand Model from a national Study perspective • Travel time savings What Was • Reduced crash rate Measured • Project costs (e.g., operating and capital costs) CO-71 Truck Freight Diversion Feasibility Study • Shoulders with Passing Lanes - 12-foot passing lanes and 8-foot shoulders Alternatives • Four-Lane Highway - four full 12- foot wide lanes with 8-foot shoulders CO-71 Truck Freight Diversion Feasibility Study 2018 Movement of Permitted Loads in Colorado Texas Ports-to-Plains Interstate Feasibility Study Texas Ports-to-Plains Interstate Feasibility Study Future Interstate Designation Future Interstate Designation Support for the Designation in Colorado Colorado Concern, a statewide CEO-based organization devoted to investing in and promoting a pro-business environment through the political process, published in TOGETHER WE BUILD: How Federal Infrastructure Investments Can Put Coloradans Back to Work, Recommendations from the Colorado Infrastructure Committee, a Project of Colorado Concern. On page 10 the recommendations include: Future Interstate Designation Support for the Designation in Colorado Future Interstate Designation Support for the Designation in Colorado The Ports-to-Plains Alliance has received Resolutions Supporting Future Interstate Designation in Colorado. City of Brush Lincoln County Colorado Freight Advisory Council Lincoln County Economic Development Corporation Colorado Motor Carriers Association Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation East Central Council of Governments Morgan County Kiowa County Move Colorado City of Lamar Pro 15 Town of Limon Washington County Limon Chamber of Commerce Future Interstate Designation Current Status of Legislation Future Interstate Designation Current Status of Legislation H.R 2 – The Moving Forward Act Designated the Entire Texas and New Mexico Ports- to-Plains Corridor as a Future Interstate Highway Future Interstate Designation Current Status of Legislation Future Interstate Designation Current Status of Legislation Future Interstate Designation The Ask Asking for Colorado support for Congress to designate all of the Ports-to-Plains Corridor in Colorado, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas and the portion of the Heartland Expressway in Colorado between I-70 at Limon and I-76 at Brush. Future Interstate Designation The Ask Thank You Joe Kiely PO Box 758 Limon, CO 80829 719-740-2240 [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Theodore Roosevelt Expressway and the Central North American Trade Corridor
    The Theodore Roosevelt Expressway and the Central North American Trade Corridor Prepared by Esther Tumuhairwe Mark Berwick Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University Fargo, ND October 2008 Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the work of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Mountain-Plains Consortium in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. North Dakota State University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, Vietnam Era Veterans status, sexual orientation, marital status or public assistance status. Direct inquiries to the Executive Director and Chief Diversity Officer, 202 Old Main, (701) 231-7708. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Corridor analysis has been completed for many different designations since the passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) in 1991. These studies have been conducted without a clear understanding or blueprint of what should be analyzed. Differences exist in corridor analysis between rural and urban, passengers and freight, the reason for the corridor analysis, and whether the corridor is recognized by all states, provinces, and counties it passes through. The steps necessary to establish a freight corridor are ambiguous therefore, a document that describes the analysis/study process would be beneficial. A review of other corridor studies is provided. The Theodore Roosevelt Expressway and the Central North American Trade Corridors are described, including how they connect to other corridors. This paper provides some demographic and geographic information, but does not address highway capacity needs, right of way needs, restricted speed policy, processes for determining future access, evaluation of current access right of way needs for future frontage roads, and bypass opportunities in and around communities.
    [Show full text]
  • National Highway System Designation Act of 1995
    PUBLIC LAW 104±59ÐNOV. 28, 1995 NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNATION ACT OF 1995 ?567 109 STAT. 568 PUBLIC LAW 104±59ÐNOV. 28, 1995 Public Law 104±59 104th Congress An Act Nov. 28, 1995 To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the designation of the National [S. 440] Highway System, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of National the United States of America in Congress assembled, Highway System Designation Act SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. of 1995. Intergovern- (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as the ``National mental relations. Highway System Designation Act of 1995''. 23 USC 101 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.Ð Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Secretary defined. TITLE IÐNATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM Sec. 101. National highway system designation. TITLE IIÐTRANSPORTATION FUNDING FLEXIBILITY Sec. 201. Findings and purposes. Sec. 202. Funding restoration. Sec. 203. Rescissions. Sec. 204. State unobligated balance flexibility. Sec. 205. Relief from mandates. Sec. 206. Definitions. TITLE IIIÐMISCELLANEOUS HIGHWAY PROVISIONS Sec. 301. Traffic monitoring, management, and control on NHS. Sec. 302. Transferability of apportionments. Sec. 303. Quality improvement. Sec. 304. Design criteria for the national highway system. Sec. 305. Applicability of transportation conformity requirements. Sec. 306. Motorist call boxes. Sec. 307. Quality through competition. Sec. 308. Limitation on advance construction. Sec. 309. Preventive maintenance. Sec. 310. Federal share. Sec. 311. Eligibility of bond and other debt instrument financing for reimbursement as construction expenses. Sec. 312. Vehicle weight and longer combination vehicles exemptions. Sec. 313. Toll roads.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSFLO Express Scan Station Locations 4/12/2021 9:00:10 AM
    TRANSFLO Express Scan Station Locations 4/12/2021 9:00:10 AM Store Company Name Address City State Interstate Number FJ792 Flying J 1260 Cassils Road East Brooks AB 1260 Cassils Road FJ793 Flying J 4216 72 AVENUE SE Calgary AB 72 Ave SE FJ848 Flying J 4949 Barlow Trail SE Calgary AB Barlow Trail FJ785 Flying J 11511 - 40 St. S.E Calgary AB 11511 40th Street SE FJ850 Flying J 16806 118 Ave Edmonton AB 118 Ave FJ846 Flying J Hwy 9 & Hwy 36 South Hanna AB Hwy 9 & Hwy 36 South FJ868 Flying J 2194 Saamis Drive Medicine Hat AB PK868 Pilot Travel Center Kiosk 2194 Saamis Drive Medicine Hat AB FJ869 Flying J 2810 21st Avenue, TOL 1R0 Nanton AB HWY-2 N. FJ795 Flying J 302 20 AVENUE Nisku AB 302 20th Ave FJ796 Flying J 6607 67th Street Red Deer AB 67th Ave. & 67 St PK786 Pilot Travel Center Kiosk 50 Pembina Rd. Sherwood Park AB Hwy 16 PK824 Pilot Travel Center Kiosk 5329 Govenlock Mountain Whitecourt AB Hwy 43 Road FJ824 Flying J 5329 Govenlock Mountain Whitecourt AB hWY 43 Road PT1030 Pilot Travelcenters 12680 South Kedzie ave Alsip AL I-57,Exit 353 PK602 Pilot Travel Center Kiosk 224 Daniel Payne Drive Birmingham AL I-65 & SR 94, Exit 2 PT369 Pilot Travelcenters 901 Bankhead Highway West Birmingham AL I-20/59/65 AL78 X123 FJ602 Flying J 224 Daniel Payne Drive Birmingham AL I-65&SR 94, Exit 264 PK369 Pilot Travel Center Kiosk 901 Bankhead Highway West Birmingham AL I-20/59/65 AL78 X123 LV368 Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores I-65, Exit 208 Clanton AL I-65, Exit 208 PK4555 Pilot Travel Center Kiosk 3201 Buttermilk Rd Cottondale AL I-59 & I-20 Exit 77 TA016 Travel Centers of America 3501 Buttermilk Road Cottondale AL I-20, Exit 77 AB104 Ambest, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • La Entrada Al Pacifico Planning Study-TTI-12-7-04
    LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO TRADE CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY Prepared for: Midland-Odessa Metropolitan Planning Organization and Texas Department of Transportation – Odessa District Prepared by: Texas Transportation Institute December 2004 LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO TRADE CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY by by William E. Frawley, AICP Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute John Overman, AICP Associate Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute Juan Villa Associate Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute and Ajay Shakyaver, P.E. Advanced Transportation Planning Engineer Texas Department of Transportation Project Title: Provide Technical Assistance Related to a Future National Corridor Planning and Development Study for the “La Entrada al Pacifico” Trade Corridor for the Midland-Odessa MPO December 2004 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank the project director, Robert Cox, of the Midland-Odessa Metropolitan Planning Organization. The authors would also like to acknowledge the assistance provided by the following individuals for their valuable assistance and input: Lauren Garduno – Texas Department of Transportation James Beauchamp – Midland-Odessa Transportation Alliance In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge Claire Fazio of the Texas Transportation Insitute (TTI) for her work on maps and graphics, Edd Sepulveda of TTI for his statistical work, Lisa Day of TTI for her work on graphics, and Carol Court for her editorial work.
    [Show full text]
  • Ports-To-Plains Corridor Interstate Feasibility Study
    PORTS-TO-PLAINS CORRIDOR INTERSTATE FEASIBILITY STUDY STRATFORD 87 287 DALHART 54 DUMAS 87 60 40 AMARILLO 60 27 385 LAMESALUBBOCK 84 SEGMENT 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 380 TAHOKA JUNE 30, 2020 BIG SPRING 180 LAMESA MIDLAND ODESSA 349 BIG SPRING MIDLAND SAN ANGELO 158 ODESSA 87 20 385 SAN ANGELO ELDORADO 67 SONORA 190 ELDORADO 10 96 SONORA 83 277 DEL RIO EAGLE PASS 277 35 CARRIZO SPRINGS GULF OF MEXICO MEXICO 1 PORTS-TO-PLAINS CORRIDOR INTERSTATE FEASIBILITY STUDY (HB 1079) LAREDO 281 SEGMENT #2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ports-to-Plains Corridor Interstate Feasibility Study (House Bill 1079) The Ports-to-Plains Corridor is an international, national and state significant transportation corridor that connects and integrates Texas’ key economic engines, international trade, energy production and agriculture. The corridor also plays a vital role in supporting the growing demographic and economic centers of South and West Texas. The corridor functions as the only north- south corridor facilitating the movement of people and goods in South and West Texas and beyond. Purpose of this Report The Segment #2 Committee Ports-to-Plains Corridor Interstate Feasibility Study Report (Segment #2 Committee Report) provides the recommendations and priorities of the Segment #2 Committee members for improvements to the Ports-to-Plains Corridor in Segment #2. The Segment Committee #2 Report meets the requirements outlined in House Bill 1079 that was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on June 10, 2019. The recommendations in this Segment #2 Committee Report will be used by the Ports-to-Plains Advisory Committee to make their recommendations on improvements to the Ports-to-Plains Corridor to the Texas Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Paving the Way with an Interstate
    Ports‐to‐Plains Update Paving the Future with an Interstate Topics • Texas Ports‐to‐Plains Interstate Feasibility Study • Future Interstate Designation Legislation • New Mexico Progress • Colorado Highway 71 Truck Freight Diversion Feasibility Study • Ports‐to‐Plains Passing Lanes on US 287 Texas Ports‐to‐Plains Corridor Interstate Feasibility Study What is the Ports‐to‐Plains Corridor? Key Challenges • Connectivity • Nation’s largest inland port, Laredo, Texas is not connected by interstate to the primary sources of energy and agriculture production. • Additionally, there are approximately 600 miles between I‐25 in New Mexico and I‐ 35 in Central Texas, making connectivity for most of Texas a challenge. • Economic Development • The lack of interstate standard infrastructure has negatively impacted the ability to attract economic activity. • Safety • Crash rates on undivided highways are significantly higher than the interstate‐ standard infrastructure. • Access and Mobility • Most of the communities along the Corridor do not have access to an interstate, creating a barrier to economic opportunities. Ports‐to‐Plains Corridor Trends 1990‐2050 Economic Outlook 1990‐2050 Baseline Travel Times 2018‐2050 Baseline Safety 2018‐2050 Baseline Freight Flow & Tonnage 2018‐2050 Baseline Freight Flow & Tonnage Current Export Markets Freight Flow & Tonnage Current Import Markets Corridor Interstate Feasibility Analysis and Findings 2050 Baseline 2050 Interstate Upgrade Corridor Interstate Feasibility Analysis and Findings Corridor Interstate Feasibility
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Advisory Committee January 3, 2017 2:00 P.M. 916 Main Street, 2Nd Floor Conference Room Lubbock, Texas
    Transportation Advisory Committee January 3, 2017 2:00 p.m. 916 Main Street, 2nd Floor Conference Room Lubbock, Texas 1. Call to Order of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 2. Acknowledgement of Quorum of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 3. Safety Procedures. 4. Public Comment Period/Acknowledgement of Guests of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 5. Approval of the October 4, 2016 Transportation Advisory Committee meeting minutes. 6. Consider a Resolution approving the 2016 Annual Performance and Expenditure Report and Listing of Obligated Projects to advance to the Policy Committee. 7. Discuss the status of the 2017/2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). 8. Consider a Resolution supporting the extension of I27 to advance to the Policy Committee. 9. Reports: Cities and County TxDOT Citibus LPD/DPS Texas Tech University Director’s AGENDA ITEM 1 Call to Order of the Transportation Advisory Committee. AGENDA ITEM 2 Acknowledgement of the Quorum of the Transportation Advisory Committee. AGENDA ITEM 3 Safety Procedures. Discussion: None Staff Recommendation: Review Safety Procedures Employee or Public Accident In the event that an emergency or serious illness of an employee or visitor while in this meeting: 1. Call 911 2. Call Courthouse security at 775-1547 or 775-1548. a. Provide address b. Type of emergency c. Do not move injured or ill person d. Designate someone to wait for the ambulance at the main Entrance Doors. e. HOLD elevator (same person who will wait for Emergency Personnel) Tornado or Inclement Weather When a tornado warning has been issued by the National Weather Service the office contacts will be notified by Courthouse Security and an automatic alarm system will sound: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Department of Transportation Regional ITS Architecture for Southeastern Colorado
    REGIONAL ARCHITECTURE FOR SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Colorado Department of Transportation Regional ITS Architecture for Southeastern Colorado November 2006 Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems Architecture for Southeastern Colorado Prepared for: Colorado Department of Transportation – ITS Branch Project Manager: Bruce Coltharp Prepared by: URS Corporation 8181 East Tufts Avenue Denver, CO 80237 303-694-2770 URS Project Number 22237128 November 2006 Regional ITS Strategic Plan for Southeastern Colorado CDOT Region 1 and Region 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................i A. Project Area....................................................................................................i B. Issues and Needs...........................................................................................iv C. Core ITS Services ..........................................................................................v D. Market Packages...........................................................................................vi E. Roles and Responsibilities...........................................................................viii F. Functional Requirements.............................................................................viii G. Recommended ITS Projects ..........................................................................xi H. Financial Summary .....................................................................................xiv
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Materials Route Registry
    LEGEND Restrictions (Columns A to K) Designations (Columns L to P) 0 = All Hazmats A = All NRHM Hazmats 1 = Class 1 Explosives B = Class 1 Explosives 2 = Class 2 - Gas P = Class 7 HRCQ Radioactive 3 = Class 3 - Flammable I = Toxic Inhalation Hazard (TIH) 4 = Class 4 - Flammable Solid/Combustible M = Medical Waste 5 = Class 5 - Organic 6 = Class 6 - Poison 7 = Class 7 - Radioactive ID 8 = Class 8 - Corrosives REST = Restricted Route 9 = Class 9 - Dangerous (Other) PREF = Preferred Route i = Toxic Inhalation Hazard (TIH) PRES = Prescribed Route RECOM - Recommended Route YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR ALABAMA YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALBattleship Parkway [Mobile] froma By Bridge Rd. Alabama Mobile [Mobile] to Interstate 10 [exit 27] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALBay Bridge Rd. [Mobile] from Interstate 165 to Alabama Mobile Battleship Parkway [over Africa Town Cochran Bridge] [Westbound Traffic: Head south on I165; To by-pass the downtown area, head north on I165.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 10 from Mobile City Limits to Exit 26B Alabama Mobile [Water St] [Eastbound Traffic: To avoid the downtown area, exit on I-65 North] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 10 from Mobile City Limits to Exit 27 Alabama Mobile 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 65 from Interstate 10 ton Iterstate 165 Alabama Mobile [A route for trucks wishing to by-pass the downtown area.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 65 from Mobile City Limits to Interstate Alabama Mobile 165 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 165 from Water St.
    [Show full text]
  • NRHM Routes in Texas Page 1 of 12 1/23/07
    NRHM Routes in Texas Page 1 of 12 1/23/07 Date of ord Through City County Route Description # of ord or code Prohibited or code Routing Bexar IH 10 (Bexar County) from East IH 410 to the Guadalupe/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar IH 10 (Bexar County) from North IH 410 to the Kendall/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar IH 10 (Bexar County) from the Fredericksburg/Woodlawn interchange to the IH 10/IH 35 M.O.#108547 X interchange Bexar IH 35 (Bexar County) from IH 35/IH 10 interchange to the IH 10/IH 35/US 90 interchange M.O.#108547 X Bexar IH 35 (Bexar County) from North IH 410 to the Guadalupe/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar IH 35 (Bexar County) from South IH 410 to the Atascosa/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar IH 35 (Bexar County) from the IH 35/IH 37/US 281 interchange to the IH 10/IH 35 M.O.#108547 X interchange Bexar IH 37 (Bexar County) from IH 410 to the Atascosa/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar IH 37 (Bexar County) from the IH 35/IH 37/US 281 interchange to the IH 37/Durango St. M.O.#108547 X interchange Bexar IH 410 (Bexar County) entire highway M.O.#108547 X Bexar SH 16 (Bexar County) from South IH 410 to the Atascosa/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar US 181 (Bexar County) from IH 410 to the Wilson/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar US 281 (Bexar County) from North IH 410 to the Comal/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar US 281 (Bexar County) from South IH 410 to the Atascosa/Bexar county line M.O.#108547 X Bexar US 87 (Bexar County) from East IH 410 to the Wilson/Bexar County line M.O.#108547 X Bexar
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Improvement Corridors in This Plan Utilized the Following Method
    CHAPTER 7: TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS 7.0 DEFINITIONS Three types of transportation corridors are identified in the 2005-2030 Oklahoma Statewide Intermodal Transportation Plan: • Transportation Improvement Corridors: These are highway corridors where projected traffic volumes indicate additional capacity will be needed by 2030. • National High Priority Corridors: These are Congressionally-identified corridors of national significance. There are four such corridors in Oklahoma: (1) US 287 [Ports-to-Plains Corridor] from Texas to Colorado in Cimarron County; (2) US 54 [TransAmerica Corridor] from Texas to Kansas in Texas County; (3) I-35 from Texas to Kansas; and, (4) US 412 from Tulsa to Memphis, Tennessee. These corridors are eligible for special discretionary funding from the National Corridor Planning and Development (NCPD) program. • Freight Operational Improvement Corridor: These corridors represent highways with high truck traffic but do not indicate capacity needs by 2030. However, the efficiency of the these corridors is compromised by conditions such as stops in towns and cities, bridge deficiencies, geometrics, urban speed zones, school zones, at grade rail crossings, or other operating conditions that reduce the efficiency of freight movements. These corridors can benefit from corridor studies and improvements from a menu of improvements such as bypasses; intelligent transportation systems for driver information on traffic flows, weather conditions, etc.; bridge upgrades; rail grade separations; signal timing; and, geometric roadway improvements. 7.1 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT CORRIDORS 7.1.1 Definition The Transportation Improvement Corridors are highway corridors needing capacity upgrades by 2030. Transportation Improvement Corridors were first identified in the 1995 Oklahoma Statewide Intermodal Transportation Plan and resulted in the policy “To provide for continued safe and efficient movement, the plan includes the development from two to four lanes along the corridors”.
    [Show full text]