DOCSLIB.ORG

3.3. Ensuring Safety of Russian Npps. Radiation Impact on Personnel and Citizens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3.3. Ensuring Safety of Russian Npps. Radiation Impact on Personnel and Citizens GENERATING RECORDS 2014ANNUAL REPORT 2 Strategy and Outlook page 26 «The priority development objectives of the Concern are safe, efficient, and reliable operation of the operating NPPs, increase of the nuclear generation share in the power balance of Russia, implementation of innovative projects, entry into the international market, and increase of efficiency». ALEXANDER LOKSHIN Chairman of the Board of Directors, Rosenergoatom Concern OJSC, First Deputy General Director for Operations Management, Rosatom State Corporation 9 1 189 NPP power units floating power unit bln KWh – under construction under construction production plan for the year 2015 Key Performance Results page 36 bln KWh – additional power generation years with no events due to VVER-type power above Level 1 according 14.3units capacity increase 15to the INES scale NPP installed capacity share NPP electricity production Power generation compared in total capacity of Russia’s share in total production of to the FTS balance 11 UES Russia’s UES VVER-type power units operate at increased capacity 10.9% 17.6% 107.3% 3 Corporate Governance page 124 bln rubles – MAIN PRINCIPLES e*$,!%&%&$ #!$&,+)+,$'%* economic impact of the OF CORPORATE safeguard of funds provided )+,%#2 %"$*+&, $!*$ #!$&,4+$? competitive procurement MANAGEMENT procedures e/4"&!*,*$,'$&,,% all stockholders when they exercise their 5.8 right to take part in management. e$#%3&!,!%&%+,,4*%*)*!3 ,+ of stakeholders. e!'$")&##4*,$!+#"%+4*$% 4 22 546 !&%*',!%&%&""+!3&! #&,$-$&,+ associated with Concern's activity. general meetings of meetings mln rubles – shareholders held of the Board o remuneration of the key in 2014 f Directors managerial personnel Interaction with page 150 Stakeholders Sosnovy Bor regions taking town of Kurchatov part in the Novovoronezh Atom-Class project Zarechny 6 settlement Volgodonsk of Novy Eroglyk 16 8,000 5,000 41 Public discussions public discussions Persons visit the Community project recognized participants Information Centers the winner of the socially held in the Concern of NPPs yearly +!3&! #&,(*%1$#,+ presence regions competition 4 Contents Key Performance Results . 6 OVERVIEW STRATEGY AND OUTLOOK Business Model . 8 2014 Calendar of Key Events . 10 1.1. General Information. 22 2.1. Mission . 28 Business Geography . 12 1.2. History . 23 2.2. Business Model . 28 Address by Board 1.3. Corporate Structure . 24 2.3. Strategic Goals and Initiatives . 32 of Directors Chairman . 15 2.4. Material Aspects Address by General Director. 16 of Performance. 34 Concern’s Awards . 18 Public Reporting Awards . 19 2 5 KEY PERFORMANCE RESULTS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INTERACTION WITH STAKEHOLDERS 3.1. Situation in Electric 4.0. Corporate Governance. 126 5.1. Interaction with Stakeholders Power Industry . 38 4.1. Concern’s Corporate in Reporting Period . 152 3.2. Production Capital. Governance Structure . 127 5.2. Interaction as this Annual Generating Capacities . 42 4.2. Governance and Control Report Was Prepared . 156 3.3. Ensuring Safety of Russian Bodies . 128 5.3. Stakeholders Commission. 157 NPPs. Radiation Impact on 4.3. KPI. Employee Evaluation 5.4. Public Reporting System . 158 Personnel and Citizens . 62 and Remuneration . 136 3.4. Natural Capital. 4.4. Internal Control and Auditing . 138 Environmental Impact . 76 4.5. Risk Management . 141 3.5. Developing Generating 4.6. Quality Management . 143 Potential . 82 4.7. Purchase Management . 146 3.6. Financial Capital. 4.8. Property Management. 147 APPENDICES Performance Results . 86 4.9. Information Technology. 148 TO THE ANNUAL REPORT . 159 3.7. Human Capital. Labor Protection . 91 3.8. Intellectual Capital. Knowledge Preservation 3and Transfer. Innovations 45 Management . 102 3.9. Social Capital and Goodwill. Developing Areas of Presence. Charity . 106 3.10. Investments in Development . 113 3.11. International Activities . 116 6 Key Performance Results The second place among 0 0 the world’s leading companies The first place among in terms of NPP installed Russian electric power capacity and operating N 1generation companies N 2units quantity Asset value, mln rubles Registered capital, Net asset value, Power generation, Investments in equity, mln rubles mln rubles bln KWh mln rubles 1,355,827 1,240,961 1,181,245 177,270.3 1,059,013 154,191.0 1,087,826 671,517 671,517 177.3 180.5 146,230.5 936,154 172.2 530,012 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 Labor efficiency, Average headcount, Charitable contributions, Installed capacity use EBITDA margin, % thousand rubles/pers. pers. mln rubles factor (ICUF), % 6,753.8 44.95 44.26 37,492 586 6,420.3 35,933 36,269 40.66 80.9 81.6 466.7 77.9 5,743.3 396 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 9.2 2.6 417.8 34.1 bln rubles – ln rubles – % – net profit increase bln rubles – labor safety expenditures social policy expenditures in 2014 international orders portfolio Rosenergoatom Concern OJSC www.rosenergoatom.ru 2014 Annual Report 7 years with no events above Level 1 according NPP share in Russia’s 15to the INES scale 17.2%energy balance 1. In 2014, 8,632 mln rubles 1 Revenue, mln rubles Net profit, mln rubles Taxes paid, mln rubles, including: were transferred to Atomenergo- prom JSC – a responsible 9,238 21,094 participant in the consolidated group of taxpayers (CGT) for the 253,215 3,609 purpose of profit tax payment 232,857 (5,601 mln rubles in 2013). 200,526 18,274 182 4,280 2,211 11,043 13,572 189 -1,849 3,991 6,867 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 Gross profit, mln rubles Total volume of profit tax payments accrued, 204 mln rubles 6,967 105,607 96,309 9,325 6,938 76,115 6,254 5,351 4,801 – Personal income tax – local budgets 2,411 – Budgets of constituent entities of the Russian Federation – Federal budget 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 180.5 107.3 106.6 189 bln KWh – power generation % – FTS balance fulfillment % – total value of the KPI bln KWh – in 2014 fulfillment in 2014 power generation plan for 2015 8 Business Model* Resources Key business processes 12PRODUCTION AND INNOVATIVE CAPITAL 33 10 25.2 KEY PROCESSES Units NPPs GW — Installed capacity Operation of existing 11.9 118.3 NPPs Procurement bln rubles incl. VAT procedures totaling Construction management of new NPP units FINANCIAL CAPITAL (BLN RUBLES) Sale of electrical 232.9 2.211 476.7 and thermal power Revenue Net profit Investments in 2013 in 2013 in equity Service of NPPs for 3 years designed in Russia abroad HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES 37,492 Organization/performance Persons — headcount of R&D work Modernization of existing NPPs SOCIAL AND NATURAL CAPITAL 11 200 Development of international activity Geographical Ha — Area of NPPs with VVER-type regions high capacity units of operations Rosenergoatom Concern OJSC www.rosenergoatom.ru 2014 Annual Report 9 * For the detailed business model description see Page 25 Value Creation. Results of 2014 PRODUCTION AND INNOVATIVE3 CAPITAL 180.5 81.6% Bln KWh — ICUF generation 17.2% Share in Russia’s energy balance FINANCIAL CAPITAL (BLN RUBLES) 253.2 9.2 18.3 Revenue Net profit Taxes paid HUMAN CAPITAL 4.9 6.7 Mln hours — Mln rubles/pers — employees labor efficiency training SOCIAL AND NATURAL CAPITAL -5.9% 0.4 Atmospheric Bln rubles — emissions Investments reduction in communities 10 2014 Calendar of Key Events MAY JUNE AUGUST OCTOBER TheThe NinthNinth Interna-IInn CommencementCoCommencemmencem of RosenergoatomRRosenergoaosenergoa Con- The contract extending RostekhnadRostekhnaRostekhnadzor granted ttionalional ScScieScientifiient c and work on bribrinbringingn the cern was recognizedrerecc the operation term for tthehe lilicensecense ffor an TechnicalTechnihnicalcal ConferenceCo BN-800BN-800 reactorrreaea of the as the best technicalt the 5th power unit to additionaladditional operatingo “Safet“Safety,y, EfEffifi ciency, and new ppowerower uunit No. 4 susupervisorpervisor sservice of 60 years was executed pperioderiod ooff 25 years for EEconomicsconomics oof Nucle- ooff the BeloBeloyBeloyarsky NPP Rosatom SStStatet Corpo- between the consor- ppowerower unit NNo. 4 of the ar Power InIndIndustry”d to the loweloweslowests capacity rationration in 2014.2200 tium of Rosenergoatom KKolaola NPPNPP.. ((MNTK-2014)MNTK-20011 orga- lelevel.vel. Concern OJSC – Ru- nized bbyy ththehe Concern satom Service CJSC – took place iinn Moscow. EDF, and the Kozloduy NPP. 07.08 27.06 08.10 21-23.04 Rosenergoatom Concern OJSC www.rosenergoatom.ru 2014 Annual Report 11 More detailed information on the key events may be found in the interactive version of the Report DECEMBER Memorandum of Co- The aannualnnual task of IInn ththee nnightight between PoPowerwer uunitnit NNo. 3 of For the fi rst time ever operation was signed tthehe FTFTSS ooff RRussia tthehe 21 aandnd 22 of De- tthehe RRostovostov NNPP was in the nuclear power between the AAP NP on power generationge cembercember RussianRus NPPs includedincluded inin thet Russian industry Russian NPPs Fund and the Hun- ((168.3168.3 blnln KKWh) was ffollowedollowed ththrthroughr with uniunififi ed eneenergynerr system. achieved a record garian Association of comcompletedpleted aahead of the tartargetget iinindicatorn of aggregate capacity of Social Inspection and scscheschedulehedule Rosatom StState Corpo- over 26.4 GW (with the Information (TEIT). ration havihavingvinn gener- NPP installed capacity ated 1717555bl bblnl KWh of of 25.2 GW). electrical ppopower.o 27.12 11.12 21-22.12 12 Business Geography KOLA NPP LENINGRAD NPP KALININ NPP SMOLENSK NPP KURSK NPP NOVOVORONEZH NPP BELOYARSK
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of JSC Atomenergomash
    JSC ATOMENERGOMASH 2016 INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT ar2016.aem-group.ru JSC Atomenergomash provides access to the integrated interactive version of the annual report for 2016 for its stakeholders. This product allows easy information presentation of the main annual results of the Company, as well as the access to additional data, which was not included in the print version in a analysis-friendly format. i – Links to online version GRI – GRI indicators Approved by the Board of Directors on May 26, 2017 Preliminarily approved by the Chief Executive Officer on May 19, 2017 Chief Executive Officer Andrey Nikipelov JSC ATOMENERGOMASH THE COMPANY IN BRIEF Contents 10 YEARS OF PROGRESS ............................................................................................................................4 THE COMPANY IN BRIEF ..............................................................................................................................6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ...................................................................................................................66 2016 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................8 6.1. Ecological management ................................................................................................................................................................................................66 6.2. Emissions and Wastes .....................................................................................................................................................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM for 2009
    Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM FOR 2009 Safety Effi ciency Responsibility Safety Effi ciency Responsibility JSC Concern Rosenergoatom Annual report for 2009 Content I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Preamble 7 1.1. On the Annual Report 7 2. Statements of top management of Rosenergoatom 8 2.1. Statement of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosenergoatom 8 2.2. Statement of the General Director of Rosenergoatom 9 3. General information on Rosenergoatom 10 4. Key corporate events in 2009 11 5. Mission of Rosenergoatom 13 6. Management 13 6.1. Management structure 13 6.2. Management methods and corporate policy 24 II. CORE BUSINESS 7. Strategy 29 7.1. Positions of Rosenergoatom within the industry 29 7.2. Strategy of Rosenergoatom 30 7.3. Rosenergoatom’s medium-term development objectives and tasks (2009–2011) 30 7.4. Key performance indicators of Rosenergoatom 31 7.5. Key risks associated with Rosenergoatom’s operations 31 8. Rosenergoatom. Facts and fi gures 32 8.1. Generating capacities of Rosenergoatom 34 8.2. Electricity generation at Russian NPPs 44 8.3. Maintenance and repairs 45 8.4. Lifetime extension of NPP units 46 8.5. Production growth program 46 8.6. Construction of new power units 47 9. Priority areas of operations of Rosenergoatom 49 9.1. Production and marketing activities of Rosenergoatom 49 9.2. Investments 50 9.3. Innovation and competitive growth 50 III. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY 10. Safety 53 10.1. Safety indicators 53 10.2. Ensuring nuclear and radiation safety and non-proliferation of nuclear materials 55 4 JSC Concern Rosenergoatom 10.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Udmurtia. Horizons of Cooperation.Pdf
    UDMURTIA Horizons of Cooperation The whole world is familiar fiber, 8th – in production of pork; or hammer out a nail for a house with the gun maker Mikhail Ka- it is among 5 major regions - fur- with your own hands to have a tra- lashnikov, motor cycles «Izh», the niture producers in Russia and ditional Udmurt wedding, to re- composer Pyotr Tchaikovsky and among 10 major regions of Russia cover physical health with help of the skier Galina Kulakova but as producing dairy and meat prod- unique mud, mineral waters and long as 20 years ago there were ucts. health-giving honey (apiotherapy) few people who were able to as- Acquaintance with future part- and spiritual health – in cathe- sociate them with Udmurtia. Now ners from Udmurtia is related to drals and at sacred springs, to re- it is just a fact in history explained business tourism. Citizens of oth- lieve stresses of the metropolitan by strategic significance of the er countries and regions of Russia city in the patriarchal tranquility Republic in the defense complex when selecting a holiday destina- of villages, to choose an educa- of Russia and its remoteness from tion will not consider our region tional institution for studying. the state borders. as a health resort or touristic cen- Udmurtia is the region of hospi- Business partner highly appre- ter along with London or Paris in table and purposeful people open ciate products manufactured in the first place. for dialogue and cooperation. the Republic and extend relations However, Udmurtia is attrac- with its manufacturers. tive not only as the industrial-in- Udmurtia produces equipment novative or educational center.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Framework of Russia. the 250 Largest Industrial Centers Of
    INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA 250 LARGEST INDUSTRIAL CENTERS OF RUSSIA Metodology of the Ranking. Data collection INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA The ranking is based on the municipal statistics published by the Federal State Statistics Service on the official website1. Basic indicator is Shipment of The 250 Largest Industrial Centers of own production goods, works performed and services rendered related to mining and manufacturing in 2010. The revenue in electricity, gas and water Russia production and supply was taken into account only regarding major power plants which belong to major generation companies of the wholesale electricity market. Therefore, the financial results of urban utilities and other About the Ranking public services are not taken into account in the industrial ranking. The aim of the ranking is to observe the most significant industrial centers in Spatial analysis regarding the allocation of business (productive) assets of the Russia which play the major role in the national economy and create the leading Russian and multinational companies2 was performed. Integrated basis for national welfare. Spatial allocation, sectorial and corporate rankings and company reports was analyzed. That is why with the help of the structure of the 250 Largest Industrial Centers determine “growing points” ranking one could follow relationship between welfare of a city and activities and “depression areas” on the map of Russia. The ranking allows evaluation of large enterprises. Regarding financial results of basic enterprises some of the role of primary production sector at the local level, comparison of the statistical data was adjusted, for example in case an enterprise is related to a importance of large enterprises and medium business in the structure of city but it is located outside of the city border.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Industry
    JSC ATOMENERGOMASH RESULTS OF 20161 1 The brochure data are valid as of April 26, 2017. JSC ATOMENERGOMASH RESULTS OF 2016 The pilot fast neutron reactor After a long interruption, JSC Atomenergomash with primary sodium CEFR the nuclear industry equipment reinforces the key 3,668 developed under the order manufacture was resumed at business areas – nuclear from Chinese Nuclear Power “Atommash” plant. In particular, power industry, gas and Corporation. The developer the activities were commenced petrochemical industry, of the reactor plant was for the manufacture of the main shipbuilding and general 10 YEARS OF PROGRESS OJSC Afrikantov OKBM, the equipment of the reactor island industry. steam generator developer of the Power units 1 and 2 of was OJSC OKB GIDROPRESS. Belarusian NPP. THE HISTORY OF JSC ATOMENERGOMASH, THE mechanical ENGINEERING DIVISION OF ROSATOM STATE CORPORATION (THE «DIVISION») STARTED FROM TWO 2,947 OJSC Atomenergomash The complete cycle of steam COMPANIES. TODAY THE DIVISION IS ONE OF THE LEADING mechanical ENGINEERING COMPANIES IN RUSSIA. IT COMPRISES OVER 20 LEADING ENGINEERING manufactured a core catcher generators manufacture was at the Atommash plant in mastered – from semi-products JSC TsKBM completed the BUREAUS, MAJOR MACHINE BUILDERS, RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS. THE DIVISION IS INVOLVED IN THE KEY PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED BY ROSATOM, WIDENS unprecedentedly short time (PJSC Energomashspetsstal) to test of the new MCP design – and supplied it to the Baltic body manufacture (OJSC PZM), single-shaft configuration 2,414 Labor productivity per employee, thousand rubles THE COMPETENCES AND ACTIVELY MASTERS NEW MARKETS AND TECHNOLOGIES. 2,397 NPP. assembly of in-vessel components with water cooling of motor and shipment to client and bearing assemblies that (OJSC ZiO-Podolsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Programme [Pdf, 568
    Joint Stock Company «Russian concern for production of electric and thermal energy at nuclear power plants» (Rosenergoatom Concern JSC) ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONFERENCE “SAFETY, EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS OF NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY” (MNTK-2018) CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Moscow, May 23–24, 2018 OVERALL SCHEDULE AND TIMING May 23rd (1st Day) Participants registration (Conference hall lobby). с 0800 до 0900 Opening (Conference hall) . с 0900 до 0920 Plenary session (Conference hall) . с 0920 до 1200 Section session (the allocated rooms) . с 1400 до 1800 Exhibition of nuclear enterprises & organizations (Building 2 lobby) . с 1400 до 1800 Official dinner . с 1830 до 2100 May 24th (2nd Day) Section sessions, cont’d (the allocated rooms) . с 0900 до 1400 Exhibition of nuclear enterprises & organizations, cont’d (Building 2 lobby) . с 0900 до 1400 Plenary session – Summing up and Closing (Conference hall) . с 1430 до 1530 Timing Presentations at the plenary session: 25 to 30 min Presentations at the section sessions: 15 to 30 min including Q&A 2 CONTENTS CONFERENCE TOPICS. 5 PLENARY SESSION. 10 SECTION PROGRAMMES SECTION 1. SAFE AND EFFECTIVE OPERATION OF NPPS . 11 1.1. Operation, maintenance and repair of NPPs with VVER, RBMK, BN and EGP-6 reactors . 11 1.1.1. Operation of NPPs with VVER reactors . 11 1.1.2. Operation of NPPs with RBMK, BN and EGP-6 reactors. 13 1.1.3. Maintenance & repair and installation of NPP equipment . 15 1.2. Engineering support to NPP operations . 17 1.2.1. Equipment life management and nuclear power units lifetime extension . .17 1.2.2. Enhancement of electric equipment reliability .
    [Show full text]
  • TENEX Public Annual Report 2018 001 Публичный Годовой Отчет АО «Техснабэкспорт» 2018 002 8
    TENEX Public Annual Report 2018 001 Публичный годовой отчет АО «Техснабэкспорт» 2018 002 8 Approved by the resolution of the Board of Directors dated 28.05.2019 Director General Sergey Polgorodnik TENEX Public Annual Report 2018 2 Key Indicators of 2018 3 Key Indicators of 2018 Uranium contracting Financial results 107.0 Revenue RUB billion Contracts 18 concluded 21.1 Net profit RUB billion Total value 2.0 of concluded Earnings US $ billion contracts before Interest, 33.4 Taxes, RUB billion Depreciation and Amortization Number (EBITDA) 12 of customers Uranium sales HR and social policy Sales Average staff number Social volume programs 1.7 324 15.6 funding US $ billion people RUB million Funds directed on charity Number 4.0 80 of supplies RUB billion Number of country- 11 recipients TENEX Public Annual Report 2018 4 Stakeholder Public Assurance 5 Stakeholder Public Assurance1 Full name Company and position Signature Full name Company and position Signature Akisheva Оlga Deputy Director General for Economics and Finance, JSC “UECC” Head of Department for NFC Lifecycle Projects Integration with Koryakin Konstantin Sectorial Policies System, ROSATOM Deputy Director for International Operation — Director Belyaeva Marina of International Cooperation Department, ROSATOM Krupnik Pavel Director of International Programs, Centrus Energy Corp. Bochkin Oleg Strategic Communications Director, LLC Rusatom Overseas Deputy Head, Department for Safety Regulation of Nuclear Lavrinovich Andrey Fuel Cycle Facilities, Nuclear Power Plants for Ships and Radiation-hazardous
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on Best Practices in Initiative Budgeting Development in the Russian Federation Regions and Municipalities
    REPORT on Best practices in initiative budgeting development in the Russian Federation regions and municipalities Moscow 2018 SUMMARY This publication is a review of national experience and best practices in the development of initiative budgeting in Russia up to 2018. It analyzes various practices to involve citizens in budgeting through their participation in proposing and selecting the initiatives to be financed from the budgetary funds, and the subsequent monitoring of the project implementation. The data was collected from an official survey conducted by the Russian Ministry of Finance. The original report was prepared in Russian and published on the official site of the Ministry.1 It is planned to be published annually. This publication may be of interest to a wide range of readers, academic researchers, government officials, specialists in IB development and other practices of citizen participation, civic activists, and all those who are interested in democratic processes taking place in local communities in Russia. The report has been jointly prepared by the Department of Budget Methodology and Public Sector Financial Reporting and the Center for Initiative Budgeting at the Scientific Financial Research Institute of the Russian Ministry of Finance. Authors: Shapovalova N., Belenchuk A., Vagin V., Galkina N., Antsyferova I., Gavrilova N. 1 Electronic publication www.minfin.ru/common/upload/library/2018/08/main/IB_2018.pdf 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom EE 2014 11.Indd
    OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 The Power of Growth OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 Table of contents 5 Letter of Deputy Chairman of OAO Gazprom Management Committee 6 Introduction 8 Environmental protection management 8 Environmental Management System 11 Environmental targets and programs 13 Financing of environmental protection 16 Adverse environmental impact fee 20 Environmental performance and energy saving 20 Air protection 24 Greenhouse gas emissions 25 Utilization of associated petroleum gas 27 Reduction of vehicle fl eet impact on air 29 Water use and protection of water resources 31 Production and consumption waste management 36 Protection of land and soil 40 Protection of biodiversity 43 Energy saving 46 Parameters of environmental activity and environmental impact of OAO Gazprom abroad 48 Preventing negative impact on the environment 48 Environmental assessment of projects 50 Production environmental monitoring and control 56 Accidents and incidents 57 Environmental risks insurance 58 State environmental control 59 Environment protection scientifi c and technical support 59 Scientifi c research and development 64 Implementation of the best available technologies for environmental protection 65 Gazprom Prize in science and technical engineering 67 International cooperation 69 Information disclosure 71 Major results of Year of Environmental Awareness in OAO Gazprom 74 Offi cial events of OAO Gazprom 77 Events of subsidiary companies 84 Conclusion 85 Glossary of main terms and abbreviations 87 Addresses and contacts OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 Letter of Deputy Chairman of 5 OAO Gazprom Management Committee Dear readers! On behalf of the OAO Gazprom Management Committee I present you our Environmental Report 2014. In the Gazprom strategy as both socially responsible and power industry company, we pay special attention to the issues of preservation of nature, environmental protection and energy saving.
    [Show full text]
  • State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom
    STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM. STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM. PERFORMANCE IN 2019 PERFORMANCE IN 2019 PERFORMANCE OF STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM IN 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Report Profile 4 CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHERN SEA ROUTE 122 7.1. Escorting Vessels and Handling Cargo Traffic along the Northern Sea Route 127 CHAPTER 1. OUR ACHIEVEMENTS 6 7.2. Construction of New Icebreakers 128 History of the Russian Nuclear Industry 8 7.3. New Products 128 ROSATOM Today 10 7.4. Digitization of Operations 128 Key Results in 2019 14 7.5. Activities of FSUE Hydrographic Enterprise 129 Key Events in 2019 15 7.6. Plans for 2020 and for the Medium Term 130 Address by the Chairman of the Supervisory Board 16 Address by the Director General 17 CHAPTER 8. EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES 132 Address by a Stakeholder Representative 18 8.1. Corporate Governance 135 Financial and Economic Results 20 8.2. Risk Management 141 8.3. Performance of Government Functions 155 CHAPTER 2. STRATEGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE 22 8.4. Financial and Investment Management 158 2.1. Business Strategy until 2030 24 8.5. ROSATOM Production System 164 2.2. Sustainable Development Management 28 8.6. Procurement Management 168 2.3. Value Creation and Business Model 34 8.7. Internal Control System 172 8.8. Prevention of Corruption and Other Offences 174 CHAPTER 3. CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT 40 3.1. Markets Served by ROSATOM 42 CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN POTENTIAL 176 3.2. International Cooperation 55 AND INFRASTRUCTURE 3.3. International Business 63 9.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Degradation of Russian Coastal Regions: the Case of the Gulf of Finland
    Trumbull.fm Page 1 Friday, September 11, 2009 10:01 AM Environmental Degradation of Russian Coastal Regions: The Case of the Gulf of Finland Nathaniel Trumbull and Oleg Bodrov1 Abstract: An American geographer and Russian ecologist discuss current and prospective environmental hazards precipitated by large-scale infrastructure projects on Russia’s southern coast of the Gulf of Finland. The region, investigated by both authors during the course of regular field research from 1999 to 2009, is one of the best environmentally preserved coast- lines of the Baltic Sea with abundant potential greenfield sites, largely due to its closed-bor- der-zone status during the Soviet period. A favorable location for trade also places the region under intense development pressure. The authors devote particular attention to two major developments, a multifunctional port complex (which inter alia serves as a major pipeline ter- minus and oil export port) and expansion of an existing nuclear power plant. Based on exten- sive personal observations and government documents, they analyze the emerging environmental threat posed by these initiatives as well as the challenging political environ- ment that discourages public participation and local involvement in spatial planning. Journal of Economic Literature, Classification Numbers: O180, O290, Q280, Q530. 7 figures, 35 ref- erences. Key words: Gulf of Finland, Russia, St. Petersburg, Primorsk, Ust’-Luga port, Lenin- grad Nuclear Power Plant, Batareynaya Bay, Baltic Transportation System, oil export ports, gas pipeline terminus, aluminum production, polycrystalline silicon, nuclear waste, nature reserves, wetlands. INTRODUCTION n May 2008, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin paid a helicopter visit to the site of the Ust’- ILuga port complex, currently under construction on the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland (e.g., see Kommersant, May 15, 2008, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012 Safety Efficiency Responsibility
    ANNUAL REPORT 2012 SAFETY EFFICIENCY RESPONSIBILITY Rosenergoatom ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Rosenergoatom 4 Concern OJSC Concern OJSC 5 ANNUAL REPORT ROSENERGOATOM CONCERN ROSENERGoatoM OJSC KEY FINANCIAL CONCERN OJSC 2012 AND BUSINESS INDICATORS FOR 2010–2012, MLN RUBLES Item 2010 2011 2012 Registered capital 461,515 530,012 530,012 Revenue 210,223 201,405 200,526 Net exports revenue 90 232 324.4 Total deducted key tax 17,092.38 18,386.04 21,094.15 amounts payable to budgets, including to: • federal budget 3,893.10 7,399.33 6,254.12 • local budget and 13,199.29 10,986.71 14,840.02 budgets of the Administrative ROSENERGOATOM CONCERN OJSC Subjects of the IS THE MOST EFFECTIVE GENERATING Russian Federation COMPANY IN THE YEAR 2012 Net profit 21,744 –2,913 –1,849 Rosenergoatom Concern OJSC has won the first place in the rating G“ enerating companies: Asset value 741,549 964,734 1,087,826 effectiveness in the market” completed by the specialists of Non-commercial partnership Net asset value 679,433 835,020 936,542 “Market council” based on the results of activity in the 2012. The rating of the generating companies’ Gross profit 121,588 92,050 76,115 effectiveness is calculated and published in the Automatized information system Total profit tax, charged 7,825.76 3,083.11 6,521.93 “Electricity and power markets” of Non-commercial and paid partnership “Market council”. The rating includes the information about the results of activity Dividends payable 847 0 0 total of 77 generating companies in Russia.
    [Show full text]