Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mughal Paintings of Hunt with Their Aristocracy
Arts and Humanities Open Access Journal Research Article Open Access Mughal paintings of hunt with their aristocracy Abstract Volume 3 Issue 1 - 2019 Mughal emperor from Babur to Dara Shikoh there was a long period of animal hunting. Ashraful Kabir The founder of Mughal dynasty emperor Babur (1526-1530) killed one-horned Department of Biology, Saidpur Cantonment Public College, rhinoceros and wild ass. Then Akbar (1556-1605) in his period, he hunted wild ass Nilphamari, Bangladesh and tiger. He trained not less than 1000 Cheetah for other animal hunting especially bovid animals. Emperor Jahangir (1606-1627) killed total 17167 animals in his period. Correspondence: Ashraful Kabir, Department of Biology, He killed 1672 Antelope-Deer-Mountain Goats, 889 Bluebulls, 86 Lions, 64 Rhinos, Saidpur Cantonment Public College, Nilphamari, Bangladesh, 10348 Pigeons, 3473 Crows, and 10 Crocodiles. Shahjahan (1627-1658) who lived 74 Email years and Dara Shikoh (1657-1658) only killed Bluebull and Nur Jahan killed a tiger only. After study, the Mughal paintings there were Butterfly, Fish, Bird, and Mammal. Received: December 30, 2018 | Published: February 22, 2019 Out of 34 animal paintings, birds and mammals were each 16. In Mughal pastime there were some renowned artists who involved with these paintings. Abdus Samad, Mir Sayid Ali, Basawan, Lal, Miskin, Kesu Das, Daswanth, Govardhan, Mushfiq, Kamal, Fazl, Dalchand, Hindu community and some Mughal females all were habituated to draw paintings. In observed animals, 12 were found in hunting section (Rhino, Wild Ass, Tiger, Cheetah, Antelope, Spotted Deer, Mountain Goat, Bluebull, Lion, Pigeon, Crow, Crocodile), 35 in paintings (Butterfly, Fish, Falcon, Pigeon, Crane, Peacock, Fowl, Dodo, Duck, Bustard, Turkey, Parrot, Kingfisher, Finch, Oriole, Hornbill, Partridge, Vulture, Elephant, Lion, Cow, Horse, Squirrel, Jackal, Cheetah, Spotted Deer, Zebra, Buffalo, Bengal Tiger, Camel, Goat, Sheep, Antelope, Rabbit, Oryx) and 6 in aristocracy (Elephant, Horse, Cheetah, Falcon, Peacock, Parrot. -
16Th Infantry Division 47Th Field Artillery Camp Kearny, California Private John Leslie Banner
16th Infantry Division 47th Field Artillery Camp Kearny, California Private John Leslie Banner John Leslie Banner, a son of Samuel Banner and Ellen Radford Banner, was born on November 5, 1896 in Upton, Utah. He was the tenth of eleven children in the family of seven girls and four boys. He entered the army on September 3, 1918 and was assigned to Camp Kearny, California where he was training in the field artillery. While training, he became ill with influenza and developed pneumonia. The military contacted his Mother and she traveled to Camp Kearny to be at his side when he died. Just before he died, he told his mother, “Tell the folks not to feel bad. I am one out of thousands”. He died on December 6, 1918. A military funeral was held at Camp Kearny before his body was shipped home. Funeral services were held at the Coalville, Utah cemetery and he was buried there. At the time of his death, he was survived by his parents, four sisters and two brothers: Mary Ellen, Elizabeth Ann, Lydia, Cora Leone, Samuel, and William Henry. He was preceded in death by three sisters and one brother: Frances Alice, Lydia May, Mabel, and Benjamin. During World War I, the 16th Division was renamed the 37th Infantry Division. The formation of another division designated as the 16th Division occurred in 1918 and was stationed at Camp Kearny, California. It never went overseas and it was one of several divisions in WWI that did not select an insignia. The Army has not designated a new division as the 16th since it was demobilized in March 1919.. -
Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2020 3
SIPRI Fact Sheet March 2021 TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL KEY FACTS w The volume of international ARMS TRANSFERS, 2020 transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent pieter d. wezeman, alexandra kuimova and higher than in 2006–10. siemon t. wezeman w The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the The volume of international transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was United States, Russia, France, 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent higher than in 2006–10 Germany and China. Together, they accounted for 76 per cent of (see figure 1).1 The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the United all exports of major arms in States, Russia, France, Germany and China (see table 1). The five largest 2016–20. arms importers were Saudi Arabia, India, Egypt, Australia and China w In 2016–20 US arms exports (see table 2). Between 2011–15 and 2016–20 there were increases in arms accounted for 37 per cent of the transfers to the Middle East (25 per cent) and to Europe (12 per cent), while global total and were 15 per cent there were decreases in the transfers to Africa (–13 per cent), the Americas higher than in 2011–15. (–43 per cent), and Asia and Oceania (–8.3 per cent). w Russian arms exports From 15 March 2021 SIPRI’s open-access Arms Transfers Database decreased by 22 per cent includes updated data on transfers of major arms for 1950–2020, which between 2011–15 and 2016–20. -
Paper No. 8 Political History of Medieval India: Mid 16Th to Mid 18Th Ce
COURSE ID: PROGRAMME: BHSH 401 B.A. (H) History PAPER NO. 8 SEMESTER: POLITICAL HISTORY OF MEDIEVAL INDIA: MID 16TH TO MID 18TH CE CREDITS: IV 04 UNIT I THE MUGHAL EMPIRE 1. Sources for the study of Mughal Empire 2. Babur’s conquest of northern India 3. Mughal-Afghan conflict and the Sur interregnum 4. Mughal expansion and consolidation under Akbar, Jahangir, Shahjahan and Aurangzeb; new military technology. UNIT II POLITICAL CENTRALIZATION, THEORY OF KINGSHIP AND FORMS OF POLITICAL LEGITIMACY 5. Administrative centralization under Akbar; the Mansab and Jagir systems; changing composition of Mughal nobility. 6. Mughal theory of kingship and forms of political legitimation 7. State and religion with special reference to Akbar and Aurangzeb 8. Relations with Ottomans, Safavids and Uzbeks UNIT III EMERGENCE OF REGIONAL POWERS 9. The rise of Marathas, Maratha state under Shivaji and the Peshwas 10. Nature of Rajput polity during the Mughal period 11. Rise and growth of Sikh Power 12. Political structure of Deccan kingdoms and post-Vijaynagar Nayaka states UNIT IV REBELLIONS, DECLINE AND DISINTEGRATION 13. The crisis in agrarian and jagir systems; agrarian revolts of the late 17th and the early 18th centuries 14. The Rajput revolt of 1679 15. Disintegration of the Mughal Empire in the first half of the 18th century 16. The nature of Mughal successor states in the 18th century Reading List: 1. Catherine B. Asher and Cynthis Talbot, India before Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006. 2. Hermann Kulke and Dietmar Rothermund, A History of India, Routledge, London, 1998, (relevant chapters). 3. Irfan Habib, Medieval India: The study of a Civilization, NBT, Delhi, 2007. -
KO DT Y3 Castles
Structures - Constructing a castle Key facts Flat objects with 2-dimensions, such as square, 2D shapes Castles can have lots of features such as rectangle and circle. towers, turrets, battlements, moats, Solid objects with 3-dimensions, such as cube, oblong gatehouses, curtain walls, drawbridges 3D shapes and sphere. and flags. A type of building that used to be built hundreds of Castle years ago to defend land and be a home for Kings and Queens and other very rich people. Flag A set of rules to help designers focus their ideas and Design criteria test the success of them. When you look at the good and bad points about Evaluation something, then think about how you could improve it. Battlement Façade The front of a structure. Feature A specific part of something. Flag A piece of cloth used as a decoration or to represent a country or symbol. Tower Net A 2D flat shape, that can become a 3D shape once assembled. Gatehouse Recyclable Material or an object that, when no longer wanted or needed, can be made into something else new. Curtain wall Turret Scoring Scratching a line with a sharp object into card to make the card easier to bend. Stable Object does not easily topple over. Drawbridge Strong It doesn't break easily. Moat Structure Something which stands, usually on its own. Tab The small tabs on the net template that are bent and glued down to hold the shape together. Did you know? Weak It breaks easily. Windsor Castle is the largest castle in Basic England. -
Later Mughals;
1 liiu} ijji • iiiiiiimmiiiii ii i] I " • 1 1 -i in fliiiiiiii LATER MUGHALS WILLIAM IRVINE, i.c.s. (ret.), Author of Storia do Mogor, Army of the Indian Moguls, &c. Edited and Augmented with The History of Nadir Shah's Invasion By JADUNATH SARKAR, i.e.s., Author of History of Aurangzib, Shivaji and His Times, Studies in Mughal India, &c. Vol. II 1719—1739 Calcutta, M. C. SARKAR & SONS, 1922. Published by C. Sarkar o/ M. C. Sarkar & Sons 90 /2A, Harrison Road, Calcutta. Copyright of Introductory Memoir and Chapters XI—XIII reserved by Jadunath Sarkar and of the rest of the book by Mrs. Margaret L. Seymour, 195, Goldhurst Terrace, London. Printer : S. C. MAZUMDAR SRI GOURANGA PRESS 71/1, Mirzapur Street, Calcutta. 1189/21. CONTENTS Chapter VI. Muhammad Shah : Tutelage under the Sayyids ... 1—101 Roshan Akhtar enthroned as Md. Shah, 1 —peace made with Jai Singh, 4—campaign against Bundi, 5—Chabela Ram revolts, 6—dies, 8—Girdhar Bahadur rebels at Allahabad, 8—fights Haidar Quli, 11 —submits, 15—Nizam sent to Malwa, 17—Sayyid brothers send Dilawar Ali against him, 19— Nizam occupies Asirgarh and Burhanpur, 23—battle with Dilawar Ali at Pandhar, 28—another account of the battle, 32—Emperor's letter to Nizam, 35—plots of Sayyids against Md. Amin Khan, 37—Alim Ali marches against Nizam, 40—his preparations, 43—Nizam's replies to Court, 45—Alim Ali defeated at Balapur, 47—Emperor taken towards Dakhin, 53—plot of Md. Amin against Sayyid Husain Ali, 55—Husain Ali murdered by Haidar Beg, 60—his camp plundered, 61 —his men attack Emperor's tents, 63—Emperor's return towards Agra, 68—letters between Md. -
PAPER VII: HISTORY of INDIA IV (C.1206 - 1550) Paper Code: HHSCR3071T
PAPER VII: HISTORY OF INDIA IV (c.1206 - 1550) Paper Code: HHSCR3071T Module 1 I. Interpreting the Delhi Sultanate: Survey of sources: Persian tarikh tradition; vernacular histories; epigraphy II. Sultanate Political Structures: (a) Foundation, expansion and consolidation of the Sultanate of Delhi; The Khaljis and the Tughluqs; Mongol threat and Timur’s invasion; The Lodis: Conquest of Bahlul and Sikandar; Ibrahim Lodi and the battle of Panipat (b) Theories of kingship; Ruling elites; Sufis, ulama and the political authority; imperial monuments and coinage (c) Emergence of provincial dynasties: Bahamanis, Vijayanagar, Gujarat, Malwa, Jaunpur and Bengal (d) Consolidation of regional identities; regional art, architecture and literature Module 2 III. Society and Economy: (a) Iqta and the revenue-free grants (b) Agricultural production; technology (c) Changes in rural society; revenue systems (d) Monetization; market regulations; growth of urban centers; trade and commerce; Indian Ocean trade IV. Religion, Society and Culture: (a) Sufi silsilas: Chishtis and Suhrawardis; doctrines and practices; social roles (b) Bhakti movements and monotheistic traditions in South and North India; Women Bhaktas; Nathpanthis; Kabir, Nanak and the Sant tradition (c) Sufi literature: malfuzat; premakhayans ESSENTIAL READINGS Mohammad Habib and K.A. Nizami, eds, Comprehensive History of India, Vol. V, The Delhi Sultanate. Satish Chandra, Medieval India I. Peter Jackson, The Delhi Sultanate. Catherine Asher and Cynthia Talbot, India Before Europe. Tapan Raychaudhuri and Irfan Habib, eds, Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. I. K.A. Nizami, Religion and Politics in the Thirteenth Century. W.H. McLeod, Karine Schomer, et al, Eds, The Sants. S.A.A. Rizvi, A History of Sufism in India, Vol. -
Afghan Caravan Trade and Imperialism in India1
Páginas 00-00 Chungara Revista de Antropología Chilena AFGHAN CARAVAN TRADE AND IMPERIALISM IN INDIA1 COMERCIO DE CARAVANAS AFGANAS E IMPERIALISMO EN INDIA André Wink2 It is often supposed that Afghanistan has historically been the 'graveyard of empires’. 'It is today's textbook example of a 'failed state.' Afghans, however, should be considered among the most important empire builders of Asia in the 15th and 16th centuries. In this paper it is shown that in South Asia, the physical infrastructure of caravanserais and roads created by Afghan nomadic caravan traders known as powindas was fundamental to the development of the empires of the Indo-Afghans (1451-1556), as well as to the Mughal empire (1526-1857), and ultimately the British Raj of the 19th and 20th centuries. Key words: Afghanistan, India, caravan, Mughal Empire, powinda. A menudo se supone que Afganistán ha sido históricamente un "cementerio de imperios" y se presenta en los manuales como ejemplo de “sistemas estatales fracasados”. Los afganos, sin embargo, deberían ser considerados los más importantes constructores de imperios de Asia del sur en los siglos XV y XVI. En este estudio se muestra que en el sur de Asia, la infraestructura física de caravaneros y caminos creados por las caravanas nómadas de mercaderes afganos conocidos como powindas fue fundamental para el desarrollo de los imperios Indo-Afganos (1451-1556), así como para el imperio de Mughal (1526-1857), y finalmente el Raj británico de los siglos XIX y XX. Palabras claves: Afganistán, India, caravanas, imperio Mughal, powinda. In the medieval (7th-15th) centuries, Afghanistan shatter zone running from the Makran coast on the was a (semi-) arid and in many places cold country, Arabian Sea to the Pamir Knot and the Karakorum a wild assemblage of hills, mountains covered with Range in Central Asia. -
The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars As Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1965 The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War Charles John Goodall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Goodall, Charles John, "The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War" (1965). Master's Theses. 3907. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3907 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UTILIZATION OF ARTILLERY AND MORTARS AS INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS IN THE CHACO WAR by Charles John Goodall A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June, 1965 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation for the co-operation of the following agencies and research facilities in gathering materials and providing technical advice in the production of this thesis: The University of Texas Library, Austin, Texas. The University of North Carolina Library, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The University of Florida Library, Gainesville, Florida. Duke University Library, Durham, North Carolina. The University of California Library, Los Angeles, California The United States Army War College, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas. The United States Army Ordnance School, Ft. -
Miskina, Sarwan and Bhura, C1590-95 Akabarnama; Mines Exploding During the Siege of Chitor, (Mughal)
Miskina, Sarwan and Bhura, c1590-95 Akabarnama; Mines exploding during the siege of Chitor, (Mughal) Key facts: Artists: Composition by Miskina, colours and details painted by Sarwan and Bhura. Date: circa 1590-95 Medium: opaque watercolour and gold on paper Dimensions: 33 x 18.8 cm Source: this belongs to a presentation copy of the Akbarnama, the history of the reign of the Mughal emperor Akbar (1542-1605). The Persian text of this copy has 116 paintings done by Akbar’s artists. Location: Victoria and Albert Museum, London (IS.2:66-1896 and IS.2:67-1896) 1. ART HISTORICAL TERMS AND CONCEPTS Subject matter: The four-month siege to capture the fort of Chitor began in October 1567. It was a key part of Akbar’s campaign against the Hindu ruler of the province of Mewar in Rajasthan, who had refused to make friendly alliances with the emperor through marriage, unlike his Rajput neighbours. The fort was seen as impregnable, and a Mughal victory here would deter future resistance. In this painting, Mughal sappers prepare covered paths and lay mines to protect the advancing army. Akbar directs their work. He is identifiable by the feather in his turban: this is an emblem of royalty, as is the flywhisk held by the attendant behind him. The text explains that the placing of the mines had been done against his advice. These exploded when the invading Mughal army rode over them, and some of Akbar’s best generals were blown up. Composition: The scene is shown in a stylised, not realistic, manner. -
BABUR NAMA Journal of Emperor Babur
RESOURCES BOOK REVIEW ESSAYS BABUR NAMA Journal of Emperor Babur TRANSLATED FROM TURKISH By ANNETTE SUSANNAH BEVERIDGE NEW DELHI: PENGUIN BOOKS, 2006 385 PAGES, ISBN: 978-0144001491, PAPERBACK Reviewed by Laxman D. Satya riginally written in Turkish by Emperor Babur (1483–1530) Oand translated into Persian by his grandson, Emperor Akbar (1556– 1605), Babur Nama, Journal of Emperor Babur is now available in English, com- plete with maps, tables of the family tree, glossary, list of main characters, an Is- lamic calendar, Babur’s daily prayer, and endnotes that are not too overbearing. Dilip Hiro has done a marvelous job of editing this classic of the autobiographical account of the founder of the Mughal Empire in India that lasted from 1526–1707. It was written in an elab- orate style as a journal or daily diary and records the events in his life and times. From page one, it is obvious that Babur was a highly cultured in- dividual with a meticulous eye for recording details through observa- tion. Even though he was from an elite class of rulers and sultans, in these memoirs he records the lives of ordinary folks like soldiers, ac- robats, musicians, singers, wine drinkers, maajun eaters, weavers, water carriers, lamp keepers, boatmen, thieves, gatekeepers, rebels, dervishes (holy men), Sufis, scholars, youth, pastoralists, peasants, artisans, mer- chants, and traders. Strangely, there is very little mention of women and children other than his immediate family members—his mother, sister, aunts, or daughters—and they are always mentioned with great respect and reverence. Babur was a religious person who meticulously observed prayers and fasting during Ramadan. -
Interim Report on the Preservation Virginia Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia
2007–2010 Interim Report on the Preservation Virginia Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia Contributing Authors: David Givens, William M. Kelso, Jamie May, Mary Anna Richardson, Daniel Schmidt, & Beverly Straube William M. Kelso Beverly Straube Daniel Schmidt Editors March 2012 Structure 177 (Well) Structure 176 Structure 189 Soldier’s Pits Structure 175 Structure 183 Structure 172 Structure 187 1607 Burial Ground Structure 180 West Bulwark Ditch Solitary Burials Marketplace Structure 185 Churchyard (Cellar/Well) Excavations Prehistoric Test Ditches 28 & 29 Structure 179 Fence 2&3 (Storehouse) Ludwell Burial Structure 184 Pit 25 Slot Trenches Outlines of James Fort South Church Excavations Structure 165 Structure 160 East Bulwark Ditch 2 2 Graphics and maps by David Givens and Jamie May Design and production by David Givens Photography by Michael Lavin and Mary Anna Richardson ©2012 by Preservation Virginia and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. All rights reserved, including the right to produce this report or portions thereof in any form. 2 2 Acknowledgements (2007–2010) The Jamestown Rediscovery team, directed by Dr. William this period, namely Juliana Harding, Christian Hager, and Kelso, continued archaeological excavations at the James Matthew Balazik. Thank you to the Colonial Williamsburg Fort site from 2007–2010. The following list highlights Foundation architectural historians who have analyzed the some of the many individuals who contributed to the project fort buildings with us: Cary Carson, Willie Graham, Carl during these