BABUR NAMA Journal of Emperor Babur
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mughal Paintings of Hunt with Their Aristocracy
Arts and Humanities Open Access Journal Research Article Open Access Mughal paintings of hunt with their aristocracy Abstract Volume 3 Issue 1 - 2019 Mughal emperor from Babur to Dara Shikoh there was a long period of animal hunting. Ashraful Kabir The founder of Mughal dynasty emperor Babur (1526-1530) killed one-horned Department of Biology, Saidpur Cantonment Public College, rhinoceros and wild ass. Then Akbar (1556-1605) in his period, he hunted wild ass Nilphamari, Bangladesh and tiger. He trained not less than 1000 Cheetah for other animal hunting especially bovid animals. Emperor Jahangir (1606-1627) killed total 17167 animals in his period. Correspondence: Ashraful Kabir, Department of Biology, He killed 1672 Antelope-Deer-Mountain Goats, 889 Bluebulls, 86 Lions, 64 Rhinos, Saidpur Cantonment Public College, Nilphamari, Bangladesh, 10348 Pigeons, 3473 Crows, and 10 Crocodiles. Shahjahan (1627-1658) who lived 74 Email years and Dara Shikoh (1657-1658) only killed Bluebull and Nur Jahan killed a tiger only. After study, the Mughal paintings there were Butterfly, Fish, Bird, and Mammal. Received: December 30, 2018 | Published: February 22, 2019 Out of 34 animal paintings, birds and mammals were each 16. In Mughal pastime there were some renowned artists who involved with these paintings. Abdus Samad, Mir Sayid Ali, Basawan, Lal, Miskin, Kesu Das, Daswanth, Govardhan, Mushfiq, Kamal, Fazl, Dalchand, Hindu community and some Mughal females all were habituated to draw paintings. In observed animals, 12 were found in hunting section (Rhino, Wild Ass, Tiger, Cheetah, Antelope, Spotted Deer, Mountain Goat, Bluebull, Lion, Pigeon, Crow, Crocodile), 35 in paintings (Butterfly, Fish, Falcon, Pigeon, Crane, Peacock, Fowl, Dodo, Duck, Bustard, Turkey, Parrot, Kingfisher, Finch, Oriole, Hornbill, Partridge, Vulture, Elephant, Lion, Cow, Horse, Squirrel, Jackal, Cheetah, Spotted Deer, Zebra, Buffalo, Bengal Tiger, Camel, Goat, Sheep, Antelope, Rabbit, Oryx) and 6 in aristocracy (Elephant, Horse, Cheetah, Falcon, Peacock, Parrot. -
Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605
Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605 A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrew de la Garza Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin, Advisor; Stephen Dale; Jennifer Siegel Copyright by Andrew de la Garza 2010 Abstract This doctoral dissertation, Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, examines the transformation of warfare in South Asia during the foundation and consolidation of the Mughal Empire. It emphasizes the practical specifics of how the Imperial army waged war and prepared for war—technology, tactics, operations, training and logistics. These are topics poorly covered in the existing Mughal historiography, which primarily addresses military affairs through their background and context— cultural, political and economic. I argue that events in India during this period in many ways paralleled the early stages of the ongoing “Military Revolution” in early modern Europe. The Mughals effectively combined the martial implements and practices of Europe, Central Asia and India into a model that was well suited for the unique demands and challenges of their setting. ii Dedication This document is dedicated to John Nira. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Professor John F. Guilmartin and the other members of my committee, Professors Stephen Dale and Jennifer Siegel, for their invaluable advice and assistance. I am also grateful to the many other colleagues, both faculty and graduate students, who helped me in so many ways during this long, challenging process. -
The Great Mughal Emperors
International Journal of Applied Research 2018; 4(11): 212-217 ISSN Print: 2394-7500 ISSN Online: 2394-5869 The great Mughal emperors: A brief account of Impact Factor: 5.2 IJAR 2018; 4(11): 212-217 history and achievements www.allresearchjournal.com Received: 07-09-2018 Accepted: 08-10-2018 Dr. Rahul Maurya Dr. Rahul Maurya PhD, National Museum Abstract Institute, New Delhi, India Many dynasties ruled in India in medieval period, but Mughals were magnificent in all of them and his Empire is considered one of the classic periods of India's long and legendry history. This powerful dynasty holds up the same value in medieval history like Safavids and Ottoman dynasty. Babur, the ruler of Fargana was founder of Mughal Empire in India. His life was full of struggling and disturbance. Even he captured Samarqand for two times but could not stay there for more than hundred days and he lost his native land too. But he never bowed in front of the circumstances nor did he give up. He stood up again to change his destiny with his limited source and this time his eye was on Hindustan. The victory over Kabul set the plot to conquer the Hindustan. He attacked on Hindustan and finally captured on 21 April, 1526 A.D. after defeating Ibrahim, the Lodi king at the first battle of Panipat. This remarkable victory opened the door of immense possibilities for him and his successors. But after his death, his son Emperor Humayun had lost his Empire after defeating by Sher Shah, the great Emperor of Sur dynasty in 1540 A.D. -
Srjis/Bimonthly/ Khalid Malik (3455-3474)
SRJIS/BIMONTHLY/ KHALID MALIK (3455-3474) HUMAYUN’S STRUGGLE WITH THE RISING POWERS OF NORTHERN INDIA. Khalid malik Abstract This paper epitomises the struggle and the defeat of Humayun by the rising powers of India. The empire whose foundation was so arduously laid by Babur was nevertheless precarious and unstable in character. As soon as Humayun ascended the throne, he found himself surrounded by the difficulties on all sides in many ways. Babur had of course, defeated the Indian powers like the Rajputs, the Afghans etc., but he could not completely crush them. Babur could not do anything more than this short period of four years. In fact, the roots of Mughal dynasty had not yet gone deep into the Indian soil and were then, of course in firm. Muhammad Lodhi, Ibharim Lodhi‟s brother, had regained power in Bihar and eastern provinces after his defeat in the Battle of Gogra. Another Afghan Sardar Sher Khan had also consolidated his position considerably. Of the Afghan Sardars he was the most capable and intelligent leader, who was engaged day and night in consolidating and organising all the scattered Afghan power. On the other side, Bhadur Shah who was a very courageous and ambitious ruler had considerably improved strength, and was eagerly engaged in his effort to obtain the Delhi throne. The Rajputs too, had begun to reorganise their power after their defeats in the battles of Khanwa and Chanderi. According to Lanepoole, “His (Humayun‟s) name means fortunate and never was an unlucky sovereign so miscalled‟‟,As a matter of fact, the royal throne that he inherited from his father as his successor, was bed of throns and not that of roses. -
Battle of Ghagra.Docx
Battle of Ghagra The Battle of Ghaghra, fought in 1529, was a major battle for the conquest of India by the Mughal Empire. It followed the first Battle of Panipat in 1526 and the Battle of Khanwa in 1527. It was fought between Mughal forces under Babur against the Sultanate of Bengal under Sultan Nusrat Shah. This article will give details about the Battle of Ghaghra within the context of the IAS Exam. Background of the Battle of Ghagra Mahmud Lodi, brother of the erstwhile Sultan Ibrahim Lodi, had declared himself the rightful heir of the Delhi Sultanate following the death of his brother at the second Battle of Panipat in 1526. His claim was however jeopardised following his defeat and flight at the Battle of Khanwa in 1527. Mahmud Lodi sought and received the help of his Afghan kinsmen in the east. His forces consisting of Eastern Afghan Confederates took Bihar. The death of Sultan Mahmud Shah Lohani, the Pathan king of Bihar, his minor son Jalal ud-Din Lohani was placed on the throne. However, conflict arose between his mother Dudu and another noble Farid Khan, better known as Sher Shah Suri. The bitter infighting between the Lohani nobles distracted them from the oncoming armies of Babur, forcing the young prince to take refuge in the nearby sultanate of Bengal To prevent a total collapse of the state, the Afghans of Jaunpur invited Mahmud Lodi to ascend the throne of Bihar and Janpur. It was accepted and he managed to take over most of Bihar without opposition. Upon receiving the news of developments in Bihar, Babur decided to march there with his army and reached the banks of the river Ganges at Dadaki on February 27, 1529 where he was met by his son Humayun and general Askari. -
Investigation the Routs of Timurid Architectural Influence (1370-1524Ad) in Mughal Buildings (1526-1707Ad)
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(6): 142-148, 2013 ISSN 1991-8178 Architecural Transfer Between Two Non- Cuncurrent Styles: Investigation The Routs Of Timurid Architectural Influence (1370-1524ad) In Mughal Buildings (1526-1707ad) Maryam khazaee, NaziatyYaacob, Zakaria Alcheikh Mahmoud Awad, ZurainiMd Ali Department of architecture Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaysia Abstract: Before and after the advent of Islam, Persian architecture is heavily influential towards the structures of the Indian subcontinent. The Persian style of architecture, which includes Illkhanid, Timurid and Safavid traditions, forms the basis of Indian architecture. The most universal of the Indo- Muslim styles is the Mughal mode of the Muslim architecture, which prevails in the subcontinent, forming a pan-Indian style. It has been proven that Mughal architecture was influenced by Iranian architecture, based on the studies of many art historians. The Mughal period in India (1526-1707) was a contemporary of the Safavid dynasty in Iran (1524-1729), while the Timurid period (1370-1524) came before both. Based on several scholars, the Mughal style has been influenced by Timurid dynasty more than the Safavid's. In addition, Timurid architecture forms the prototype for both the Safavid and Mughal styles. Based on the secondary study and through the adoption of historical interpretation, this paper tries to define the possible routes for the influence from Timurid to Mughal architecture, and verify each of them. Three possible propositions are assumed. The first is via Indian styles preceding the Mughal period (Delhi sultanate, Deccan sultanate). The second route is direct influence from Timurid architecture, while the third is via Iranian style-Safavid that was in concurrent existence with Mughal's. -
The Mughal Empire
Chapter 5 8 THE MUGHAL EMPIRE ike the Ottomans, the Mughals carried the dilemma of post-Abbasid L politics outside the Arid Zone and resolved it. Unlike the Ottomans, the Mughals did not expand the frontiers of Muslim political power, ex- cept on some fringes. They established a new polity ruled by an estab- lished dynasty in territory that Muslims already ruled. The dynastic setting and the environment—physical, social, and cultural—requires careful explanation in order to make the Mughal success comprehensible. This section describes the multiple contexts in which the Mughal Empire developed and then summarizes the most important characteristics of the Mughal polity. Historians have traditionally identified Babur as the founder of the Mughal Empire and considered his invasion of northern India in 1526 as the beginning of Mughal history. Both the identification and date are mis- leading. Babur’s grandson, Akbar, established the patterns and institutions that defined the Mughal Empire; the prehistory of the empire dates back to Babur’s great-great-grandfather Timur’s invasion of north India in 1398. Because Timur remained in Hindustan (literally, “the land of Hin- dus”; the Persian word for northern India) only a short time and his troops sacked Delhi thoroughly, historians have traditionally treated his incur- sion as a raid rather than an attempt at conquest. Timur, however, did not attempt to establish direct Timurid rule in most of the areas he conquered; 201 202 5 – THE MUGHAL EMPIRE he generally left established dynasties in place or established surrogates of his own. His policy in Hindustan was the same; he apparently left one Khizr Khan as his governor in Delhi. -
On Portuguese and Other European Views of Mughal Succession Crises*
‘I will do as my father did’: On Portuguese and Other European Views of Mughal Succession Crises* Jorge Flores University of Aveiro and Brown University [email protected] Abstract The Mughal succession crises occurring between the political downfall of Akbar (c. 1600) and Aurangzeb’s death (1707) were portrayed in detail by a considerable number of European observers. This essay intends to study the way those critical moments, that would eventually lead to the disintegration of the Mughal empire, were openly desired both in Goa and Lisbon: they somewhat represented the life insurance of a defenseless Estado da Índia forced to face a giant – the Grão Mogor – that could not be controlled. On the other hand, and for different reasons, the agents of the English East India Company, operating on the ground, as well as the theatergoers that saw John Dryden’s plays in London, favored the dynastic stability of Timurid India. This represents an interesting diversity of European images of the Mogor, and asks for a careful analysis of their motives and impact. Keywords Mughal empire, Portuguese India, political succession, dynastic crises, European perceptions of Asia, early modern world. Introduction The problem of political succession, in a large spectrum of cases ranging from the simplest chieftaincies to the most sophisticated of sovereign states in diverse epochs and different societies, has recurrently occupied historians and anthropologists. Those moments of transition, when evolving towards acute political crises, are naturally capable of leaving profound marks on the collective mindset of a people. Not haphazardly, one of those crucial episodes in the history of Portugal is the death of King Sebastian (r. -
The Mughal Empire 1526-1857
THE MUGHAL EMPIRE 1526-1857 ONE OF THE TREATS OF INDIA Oskar’s Trip to India, January 2014 2 Table of Contents THE EARLY DAYS ....................................................................................................................................... 3 THE MUGHALS.......................................................................................................................................... 3 Babur .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Humayun .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Akbar .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Jahangir ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Shah Jahan ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Aurangzeb ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Later Emperors ................................................................................................................................... 10 END OF THE EMPIRE .............................................................................................................................. -
Composition and Role of the Nobility (1739-1761)
COMPOSITION AND ROLE OF THE NOBILITY (1739-1761) ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF Boctor of ^l)iIo^op}|p IN HISTORY BY MD. SHAKIL AKHTAR Under the Supervision of DR. S. LIYAQAT H. MOINI (Reader) CENTRE OF ADVANCED STUDY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2008 ABSTRACT Foregoing study ' composition and role of the Nobility (1739- 1761)', explore the importance of Nobility in Political, administrative, Sicio-cultural and economic spheres. Nobility , 'Arkan-i-Daullat' (Pillars of Empire) generally indicates'the'class of people, who were holding hi^h position and were the officers of the king as well as of the state. This ruling elite constituting of various ethnic group based on class, political sphere. In Indian sub-continent they served the empire/state most loyally and obediently specially under the Great Mughals. They not only helped in the expansion of the Empire by leading campaign and crushing revolt for the consolidation of the empire, but also made remarkable and laudable contribution in the smooth running of the state machinery and played key role in the development of social life and composite culture. Mughal Emperor Akbar had organized the nobility based on mgnsabdari system and kept a watchful eye over the various groups, by introducing local forces. He had tried to keep a check and balance over the activities, which was carried by his able successors till the death of Aurangzeb. During the period of Later Mughals over ambitious, self centered and greedy nobles, kept their interest above state and the king and had started to monopolies power and privileges under their own authority either at the court or in the far off provinces. -
Paper Iv History of the Mughals
PAPER IV HISTORY OF THE MUGHALS MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS: UNIT 1 1. Who wrote Akbar Nama? (a) Akbar (b) Abul Fazl (c) Faizi (d) Humayun 2. The Battle of Khanua was fought between: (a) Babur and Ibrahim Lodi (b) Babur and Jai Singh (c) Babur and Rana Sanga (d) Babur and Medini Rao 3. The Second Battle of Panipat was fought between: (a) Humayun and Sher Shah (b) Bairam Khan and Hemu (c) Humayun and Hemu (d) Akbar and Hemu 4. Who was the Author of Humayun Nama? (a) Humayun (b) Gulbadan Begum (c) Roshannara (d) Akbar 5. The First Battle of Panipat (1526) marked the beginning of (a) Mughal Rule in India (b) Afghan Rule in India (c) Turkish rule in India (d) Rajput Rule in India 6. After Panipat, Babur had to face with the problem of dealing with the powerful forces of: (a) Rajputs (b) Afghans (c) Lodis (d) Marathas 7. Babur’s Tuzuk or Memoir is rightly classified as a classic of: (a) World literature (b) Indian literature (c) Muslim literature (d) Classic Literature 8. Babur wrote his memoir Tuzuk-i-Baburi in his mother tongue which was: (a) Persian (b) Arabic (c) Turkish or Turki (d) Sanskrit 9. The Mughals were descendants of the (a) Mongols (b) Chaghtai Turk Mongols (c) Turks (d) Afghans 10. Before the advent of Babur in India, the centre point of the struggle for Transoxiana in Central Asia was the control over (a) Samarqand (b) Farghana (c) Kabul (d) Khurasan 11. Babur was a descendant of (a) Timur (b) Chingiz Khan (c) Both (a) and (b) (d) None of the above 12. -
Akbar and the Mughal State: the Quest for Legitimization in Hindustan
C. Holland 1 Akbar and the Mughal State: The Quest for Legitimization in Hindustan Christopher P. Holland1 1 I have attended the University of Georgia and will graduating in May 2005 with a Bachelors through the Honors Interdisciplinary program. The degree is entitled Asian Culture and was aimed at learning how religion has affected the history of Asia, more specifically that of South Asia., through combining the departments of History, Religion, and Comparative Literature. I worked with professors in different departments and institutions to accurately bring my thesis together: Dr. Farley Richmond, Dr. Marc Gilbert, Dr. Ari D. Levine, and Dr. Kenneth Honerkamp. C. Holland 2 ABSTRACT Christopher P. Holland Akbar and the Mughal State: The Quest for Legitimization in Hindustan Jalal ud-Din Muhammad Akbar (r. 1560-1605) was a Muslim ruler who sought to create the first lasting Muslim dynasty in Hindustan. Akbar was not solely driven to do this by his own personal desire to centralize all power directly under his authority, but rather sought to use his position as sultan to employ political tools which would allow all of Hindustan to prosper. He understood that he, for his dynasty to long survive him, must first legitimize his rule, as well as establish Mughal military superiority, in the eyes of all of his subjects, including the majority Hindu population. Indeed, his re-imagining of court practices, his revision of the land revenue system, and the introduction of a variety of administrative reforms should be viewed as tools serving the larger objective of legitimizing the new Mughal sovereign in the eyes of the majority of his subjects, the Hindus, and in the eyes of possible Mughal opponents.