Ben Duckworth Investigates Who Belongs on the Right of the Party And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ben Duckworth Investigates Who Belongs on the Right of the Party And Questions of principle of opinion,” says a member of the government. Since then his judgement has not been trusted by “There are those broadly suspicious of the EU and many in the party. “I’ve still no idea what on earth then there are those who want to leave the EU.” he thought he was doing,” is a common refrain from Personality also plays its part. Prominent anti-EU his colleagues. Davis’ position is symptomatic of MPs Bill Cash and Douglas Carswell do not have a many of ‘old-guard’ of the Tory right. They have friendship. There is also a generational gap between definite qualities – Davis has the charisma and What the older eurosceptics such as Cash and Maas- presence, John Redwood the economic knowl- tricht rebel Richard Shepherd versus the younger, edge – but many resigned or were sacked and are equally well-known right-wingers such as Carswell. seen as having paid a price for their principles. There is also, on other issues, a rough split “The Tory right doesn’t have leaders. It has Below Iain Duncan between right-wingers who are libertarians and standard bearers. They’ve been sacked or not Smith, then leader of the Conservative Party, those who are authoritarian. As one well-known promoted. In some way they wear the scars meets with members ‘trouble-maker’ puts it: “I hate the sexual moralisa- that mean they’re tainted because they can’t of his shadow cabinet: is THE Michael Ancram, Theresa tion made by people in the Cornerstone Group.” get into a position of power,” says an MP. May, Bernard Jenkin For specific policies, criminal justice was a clear Graham Brady has become a key figure since and Michael Howard moment when the “wheat in the field” all blew the resigning from the Conservative frontbench over same way. The Ministry of Justice’s policies, which the grammar schools controversy in 2007. But, as recently brought a U-turn from David Cameron on Ken Clarke’s sentencing plans, have consist- ToRy ently been the sharpest divide between the Tory right and the government. The issue of votes for prisoners could also have seen the government defeated in the Commons if they had whipped it. The Whips Office’s inability to control the five minutes.” rebellions is an important factor in how the party The 1922 RigHT? behaves. The election of select committees meant executive is not Ben Duckworth investigates who belongs on the those positions were no longer available as soft made up solely The inability of the right of the party and whether it really poses landings for those looking to cause trouble. While of the ‘old guard’. Whips Office to control a threat to the current Conservative leadership David Cameron still trusts the chief whip Patrick It includes new the rebellions is an McLoughlin, who has the advantage of being intake members important factor in a working class Conservative MP, the party is Gavin Barwell, t’s like wheat blowing in a field. The the old ‘section 28’ in shadow cabinet when Theresa critical of him. One MP says: “The Whips Of- Tracey Crouch, how the party behaves. Tory right is an emotional thing,” says May, as shadow education secretary was still deter- fice is old-fashioned, with a ‘do as you’re told’ Charlie Elphicke, The election of select a Conservative MP finishing his lunch mined to keep it. I have always been in favour of uni- attitude. It’s quasi-military in its approach and Robert Halfon and committees meant those “iin Portcullis House. “It’s increasing versal child benefit. I was chairman of the Cambridge some of the whips have been there too long.” Priti Patel. Impor- positions were no longer in size, just look at the voting patterns.” The right University Tory Reform Group. So why me? I tend to The whips themselves currently divide the Tory tantly, MPs feel available as soft landings is the mythical beast of the Conservative Party, get branded ‘right-wing’ because I believe in demo- right along a pair of axes. New and old get their chairman of the 1922 committee, he that ambitious young members a mass of MPs who can ruin prime ministers and cratic self-determination rather than a European su- different colours on the vertical. Issues form the does not act as a leader, preferring will have to use the existing for those causing trouble regards itself as the keeper of the Thatcher flame. perstate and I believe in a strong defence, but these horizontal axis. Europe crosses the generational instead to act as a respected be- mechanisms within the party It is often treated as one large homogenous group issues are mainstream among the British people.” boundaries but otherwise the picture is “very hind-the-scenes operator, main- to build a right-wing power but the truth is the right’s numbers rise and fall The issue is the same for the new intake. mixed”, I’m told. The whips are finding the behav- taining the balance of the coali- base. One says: “I can’t see an- force in British politics.” He continues: “Cameron constantly, dependent on a combination of the issue, One, who is regularly mentioned as a new iour of their MPs very difficult to track and while tion by pushing for the interests yone from the 2005 or 2010 in this regard is showing more in common with personality and the government. There is also a prominent member of the right-wing, loathes there are the serial rebels, the main body of the of the Conservative Party to intake becoming leaders New Labour than Conservatives of the past.” transformation occurring within the traditional view it. “I’m a pro-free market libertarian but don’t party can switch to the right on issues or remain ensure the right’s interests are, in without those. They would This is not an attitude that the Tory right is of the right as a new generation of MPs, in a party pigeon hole me. Many of the new intake want loyal to the government. There are no set rules. the words of a member of the have to come through the comfortable with. They are far more at home that is far larger and whose MPs are very different to restore the integrity of backbenchers and it’s “Being right wing is not a generational thing,” executive, “given due promi- existing structures, particu- with the instinctive self-confidence that Mar- from a decade ago, pick up the flame and challenge not accurate to say that’s being right-wing.” says one veteran member. The attitudes of MPs nence” by the government. larly the 1922 committee.” garet Thatcher provided. She still “looms” over the older guard. With a coalition government, This question is not solely about self-identi- and their voting records suggest being right wing The 1922 committee Every Conservative the party, as a senior former minister puts it. He and many new MPs, the Tory right is changing. fication. In politics, it depends on what others is certainly not a divide of old vs new MPs within meetings now regularly attract leader has to be wary of a adds: “She acted on instinct. Look at Cameron’s For some Conservative MPs the definition of make of you. One new MP was surprised when the Conservatives. However, while the ideology over 100 MPs, a third of the powerful Tory right. David speech on NHS reforms with the five pledges. what the right represents is more prosaic. “The Tory a grandee of the party marched up and said may cross the generational divide, there are clear Conservatives’ parliamentary Cameron took it seriously You know they will have been focus grouped. right means you staying behind late at night to vote how impressed he was by how she had deftly differences and personality clashes between intakes. Pohle Richard Eggitt. Jonnny Archive. Hulton Lewis. Richard strength. MPs who previously when he became personally Thatcher never did that. She gave the party such constantly,” says one member of the 2010 intake. avoided being in either camp. She believed she One ambitious right wing member of the 2010 didn’t bother attending when involved in the AV referen- self-confidence and has never been replaced.” Key members don’t even understand the ques- had firmly followed her right-wing principles. intake mocks what he calls the “self-appointed “there was nothing to talk about” dum campaign earlier this Even over 20 years since her departure as tion. Talking to a right-wing MP, he is interrupted Europe is the issue that has traditionally defined leaders of the Conservative right”. He adds: “You flock because, even if not natural year. Cameron is respected. prime minister, her hold on the party continues. by Bill Cash, the MP perhaps most synonymous the Tory right. From Margaret Thatcher onwards, can see the different reactions when the older allies of the executive they “find “He’s very much his own man,” says One normally on-message 2010 intake member with euroscepticism in the party. Overhearing the particularly after the betrayal of the Maastricht Trea- guard speak. They get less support in the Commons it so fascinating”, as one MP puts a prominent right-wing backbencher, concedes: “It is still very much Thatcher’s party. tone of the discussion, he shakes his head: “Why ty in the early 1990s, it has built up leaders’ careers as everyone rolls their eyes when they speak.” it. David Cameron’s failed bid to and that is preferable to being simply She won three elections.
Recommended publications
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Friday Volume 571 29 November 2013 No. 85 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 29 November 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 527 29 NOVEMBER 2013 528 House of Commons European Union (Referendum) Bill Further consideration of Bill, not amended in the Public Bill Committee Friday 29 November 2013 Clause 1 The House met at half-past Nine o’clock REFERENDUM ON THE UNITED KINGDOM’S PRAYERS MEMBERSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Amendment proposed: 35, page 1, leave out lines 8 and 9 and insert [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] ‘Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union?’.—(Mike Gapes.) BILL PRESENTED Question put, That the amendment be made. The House proceeded to a Division. UNITED KINGDOM PARLIAMENT (SOVEREIGNTY)BILL Presentation and First Reading (Standing Order No. 57) Mr Speaker: I ask the Serjeant at Arms to investigate Mr William Cash, supported by Mr Bernard Jenkin, the delay in both the Aye and No Lobbies. Mr John Redwood, Sir Edward Leigh, Sir Gerald Howarth, The House having divided: Ayes 3, Noes 244. Mr John Baron, Mr Peter Bone, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Henry Smith, Chris Heaton-Harris, Mr James Clappison Division No. 141] [9.35 am and Sir Richard Shepherd, presented a Bill to make provision for the supremacy of the sovereignty of the AYES United Kingdom Parliament in relation to the United Bailey, Mr Adrian Tellers for the Ayes: Kingdom’s membership of the European Union; and Gapes, Mike Susan Elan Jones and for connected purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Restraint in Secure Training Centres
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights The Use of Restraint in Secure Training Centres Eleventh Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, and oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 26 February 2008 Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 26 February 2008 HL Paper 65 HC 378 Published on 7 March 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness John Austin MP (Labour, Erith & Thamesmead) Lord Dubs Mr Douglas Carswell MP (Conservative, Harwich) Lord Lester of Herne Hill Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) (Chairman) Lord Morris of Handsworth OJ Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & The Earl of Onslow Abingdon) Baroness Stern Virendra Sharma MP (Labour, Ealing, Southall) Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Process
    House of Commons Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 HC 1097 House of Commons Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 25 July 2006 HC 1097 Published on 7 September 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons is appointed by the House of Commons to consider how the House operates and to make recommendations for modernisation. Current membership Mr Jack Straw (Labour, Blackburn) (Chairman) Mr Paul Burstow, (Liberal Democrat, Sutton & Cheam) Ms Dawn Butler (Labour, Brent South) Ann Coffey (Labour, Stockport) Mr George Howarth (Labour, Knowsley North & Sefton East) Mr Greg Knight (Conservative, Yorkshire East) Mark Lazarowicz (Labour/Co-operative, Edinburgh North and Leith) Mrs Theresa May (Conservative, Maidenhead) Mr Adrian Sanders, (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Richard Shepherd (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Paddy Tipping (Labour, Sherwood) Mr Edward Vaizey (Conservative, Wantage) Lynda Waltho (Labour, Stourbridge) Sir Nicholas Winterton (Conservative, Macclesfield) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Liz Blackman (Labour, Erewash) Chris Grayling (Conservative, Epsom and Ewell) Mr David Heath (Liberal Democrat, Somerton and Frome) Mr Geoffrey Hoon (Labour, Ashfield) (Chairman) Jessica Morden (Labour, Newport East) Andrew Stunell (Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in an Appendix to the House of Commons Standing Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY A. INTERVIEWS Jacob Rees-Mogg MP (London), 9th February 2016. Jesse Norman MP (London), 12th September 2016. Nicholas Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Ann Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Peter Hitchens (London), 11th October 2016. Anne Widdecombe (London), 11th October 2016. Lord Salisbury (London), 12th October 2016. Sir William Cash MP (London), 13th October 2016. Sir Edward Leigh MP (London), 17th January 2017. David Burrowes MP (London), 17th January 2017. Charles Moore (London), 17th January 2017. Philip Davies MP (London), 19th January 2017. Sir Gerald Howarth MP (London), 19th January 2017. Dr. Myles Harris (London), 27th January 2017. Lord Sudeley (London), 6th February 2017. Jonathan Aitken (London), 6th February 2017. David Nicholson (London), 13th February 2017. Gregory Lauder-Frost (telephone), 23rd February 2017. Richard Ritchie (London), 8th March 2017. Tim Janman (London), 27th March 2017. Lord Deben (London), 4th April 2017. Lord Griffths of Fforestfach (London), 6th April 2017. Lord Tebbit (London), 6th April 2017. Sir Adrian Fitzgerald (London), 10th April 2017. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 191 K. Hickson, Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27697-3 192 BIBLIOGRAPHY Edward Norman (telephone), 28th April 2017. Cedric Gunnery (London), 2nd May 2017. Paul Bristol (London), 3rd May 2017. Harvey Thomas (London), 3rd May 2017. Ian Crowther (telephone), 12th May 2017. Iain Duncan Smith MP (London), 4th July 2017. Angela Ellis-Jones (London), 4th July 2017. John Hayes MP (London), 4th July 2017. Dennis Walker (London), 24th July 2017. Lord Howard of Lympne (London), 12th September 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in British Parliament∗
    Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in British Parliament∗ Jonathan B. Slapiny Justin H. Kirklandz Joseph A. Lazzarox [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Patrick A. Leslie{ Tom O'Gradyk [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Strong party discipline is a core feature of Westminster parliamentary systems. Parties typically compel Members of Parliament (MPs) to support the party position regardless of MPs' indi- vidual preferences. Rebellion, however, does occur. Using an original dataset of MP votes and speeches in the British House of Commons from 1992 to 2015, coupled with new estimations of MPs' ideological positions within their party, we find evidence that MPs use rebellion to strategi- cally differentiate themselves from their party. The strategy MPs employ is contingent upon an interaction of ideological extremity with party control of government. Extremists are loyal when their party is in the opposition, but these same extremists become more likely to rebel when their party controls government. Additionally, they emphasize their rebellion through speeches. Existing models of rebellion and party discipline do not account for government agenda control and do not explain these patterns. Keywords: Legislative Politics; Party Loyalty; Ideological Extremity; House of Com- mons ∗We will make the full replication code and data available upon publication of the article. yDepartment of Government, University of Essex zDepartment of Political Science, University of Houston xDepartment of Political Science, University of Houston {Department of Political Science, University of Essex kDepartment of Political Science, MIT 1 Introduction During David Cameron's first term as Conservative Prime Minister, Philip Hollobone | a socially conservative member of the Tory rightwing | was the most rebellious MP in the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Right
    Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britain? Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britian? Andy Walton in Britian? Andy Emerging Right’ ‘Religious a Is there Recent years have seen an increasing number of This report gives a reliable overview of evidence claims that a US-style Religious Right either exists or concerning the purported rise of the Christian is rapidly emerging in Britain. This report examines Right in Britian. Drawing on new research, it profiles Is there a ‘Religious Right’ whether or not the claims are accurate. several new Christian groups. By placing them in context, it shows why rumours that an American- Superficially, it argues, the case looks quite strong: style movement is crossing the Atlantic are greatly there is evidence of greater co-ordination among exaggerated. Christian groups with a strong socially-conservative Emerging in Britain? commitment, in particular relating to human Linda Woodhead, Professor of Sociology of sexuality, marriage, family life, and religious freedom, Religion, Lancaster University about which they are vocal and often willing to resort to legal action. This is a familiar picture within US This is a measured and thoughtful piece of research, politics. contributing to a topic where there is too much heat Andy Walton and too little light in contemporary debate. It assesses However, on closer inspection, research and analysis the presence – or, rather, the current absence – of a suggest that it is highly misleading to describe this coherent ‘Religious Right’ in British politics through with phenomenon as a US-style Religious Right. For a a detailed comparison with the characteristics of the number of reasons – economic, social, ecclesiastical movement in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychology of Food Choice Shepherd E Raats 2006.Pdf
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE This series of books addresses a wide range of topics in nutritional science. The books are aimed at advanced undergraduate and graduate students, researchers, university teachers, policy-makers and nutrition and health professionals. They offer original syntheses of knowledge, providing a fresh perspective on key topics in nutritional science. Each title is written by a single author or by groups of authors who are acknowledged experts in their field. Titles include aspects of molecular, cellular and whole-body nutrition and cover humans and wild, captive and domesticated animals. Basic nutritional science, clinical nutrition and public health nutrition are each addressed by titles in the series. Editor in Chief P.C. Calder, University of Southampton, UK Editorial Board A. Bell, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA F. Kok, Wageningen University, The Netherlands A. Lichtenstein, Tufts University, Massachusetts, USA I. Ortigues-Marty, INRA, Thiex, France P. Yaqoob, University of Reading, UK K. Younger, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland Titles available 1. Nutrition and Immune Function Edited by P.C. Calder, C.J. Field and H.S. Gill 2. Fetal Nutrition and Adult Disease: Programming of Chronic Disease through Fetal Exposure to Undernutrition Edited by S.C. Langley-Evans 3. The Psychology of Food Choice Edited by R. Shepherd and M. Raats This page intentionally left blank THE PSYCHOLOGY OF FOOD CHOICE Edited by Richard Shepherd and Monique Raats Food, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre Department of Psychology University of Surrey Guildford, UK in association with The Nutrition Society CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Office CABI North American Office Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org ©The Authors 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Author Copy Gifford C. (2006) 'The Rise of Post-Imperial Populism: The
    University of Huddersfield Repository Gifford, Chris The rise of post-imperial populism: the case of right wing Euroscepticism in Britain Original Citation Gifford, Chris (2006) The rise of post-imperial populism: the case of right wing Euroscepticism in Britain. European Journal of Political Research, 45 (5). pp. 851-869. ISSN 0304-4130 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/558/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Author copy Gifford C. (2006) ‘The rise of post-imperial populism: The case of right wing Euroscepticism in Britain’, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 851-869. The rise of post-imperial populism: the case of right wing Euroscepticism in Britain Abstract Recent approaches to contemporary Euroscepticism have explained it in terms of the politics of opposition and peripherality that is characteristic of competitive party systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill of Rights for the UK?
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights A Bill of Rights for the UK? Twenty–ninth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 21 July 2008 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2008 HL Paper 165-I HC 150-I Published on 10 August 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness John Austin MP (Labour, Erith & Thamesmead) Lord Dubs Mr Douglas Carswell MP (Conservative, Harwich) Lord Lester of Herne Hill Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) (Chairman) Lord Morris of Handsworth OJ Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & The Earl of Onslow Abingdon) Baroness Stern Mr Virendra Sharma MP (Labour, Ealing, Southall) Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]