Britain's Conservative Right Since 1945 Traditional Toryism in A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Compassthe DIRECTION for the DEMOCRATIC LEFT
compassTHE DIRECTION FOR THE DEMOCRATIC LEFT MAPPING THE CENTRE GROUND Peter Kellner compasscontents Mapping the Centre Ground “This is a good time to think afresh about the way we do politics.The decline of the old ideologies has made many of the old Left-Right arguments redundant.A bold project to design a positive version of the Centre could fill the void.” Compass publications are intended to create real debate and discussion around the key issues facing the democratic left - however the views expressed in this publication are not a statement of Compass policy. compass Mapping the Centre Ground Peter Kellner All three leaders of Britain’s main political parties agree on one thing: elections are won and lost on the centre ground.Tony Blair insists that Labour has won the last three elections as a centre party, and would return to the wilderness were it to revert to left-wing policies. David Cameron says with equal fervour that the Conservatives must embrace the Centre if they are to return to power. Sir Menzies Campbell says that the Liberal Democrats occupy the centre ground out of principle, not electoral calculation, and he has nothing to fear from his rivals invading his space. What are we to make of all this? It is sometimes said that when any proposition commands such broad agreement, it is probably wrong. Does the shared obsession of all three party leaders count as a bad, consensual error – or are they right to compete for the same location on the left-right axis? This article is an attempt to answer that question, via an excursion down memory lane, a search for clear definitions and some speculation about the future of political debate. -
A Rhetorical History of the British Constitution of Israel, 1917-1948
A RHETORICAL HISTORY OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION OF ISRAEL, 1917-1948 by BENJAMIN ROSWELL BATES (Under the Direction of Celeste Condit) ABSTRACT The Arab-Israeli conflict has long been presented as eternal and irresolvable. A rhetorical history argues that the standard narrative can be challenged by considering it a series of rhetorical problems. These rhetorical problems can be reconstructed by drawing on primary sources as well as publicly presented texts. A methodology for doing rhetorical history that draws on Michael Calvin McGee's fragmentation thesis is offered. Four theoretical concepts (the archive, institutional intent, peripheral text, and center text) are articulated. British Colonial Office archives, London Times coverage, and British Parliamentary debates are used to interpret four publicly presented rhetorical acts. In 1915-7, Britain issued the Balfour Declaration and the McMahon-Hussein correspondence. Although these documents are treated as promises in the standard narrative, they are ambiguous declarations. As ambiguous documents, these texts offer opportunities for constitutive readings as well as limiting interpretations. In 1922, the Mandate for Palestine was issued to correct this vagueness. Rather than treating the Mandate as a response to the debate between realist foreign policy and self-determination, Winston Churchill used epideictic rhetoric to foreclose a policy discussion in favor of a vote on Britain's honour. As such, the Mandate did not account for Wilsonian drives in the post-War international sphere. After Arab riots and boycotts highlighted this problem, a commission was appointed to investigate new policy approaches. In the White Paper of 1939, a rhetoric of investigation limited Britain's consideration of possible policies. -
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY A. INTERVIEWS Jacob Rees-Mogg MP (London), 9th February 2016. Jesse Norman MP (London), 12th September 2016. Nicholas Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Ann Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Peter Hitchens (London), 11th October 2016. Anne Widdecombe (London), 11th October 2016. Lord Salisbury (London), 12th October 2016. Sir William Cash MP (London), 13th October 2016. Sir Edward Leigh MP (London), 17th January 2017. David Burrowes MP (London), 17th January 2017. Charles Moore (London), 17th January 2017. Philip Davies MP (London), 19th January 2017. Sir Gerald Howarth MP (London), 19th January 2017. Dr. Myles Harris (London), 27th January 2017. Lord Sudeley (London), 6th February 2017. Jonathan Aitken (London), 6th February 2017. David Nicholson (London), 13th February 2017. Gregory Lauder-Frost (telephone), 23rd February 2017. Richard Ritchie (London), 8th March 2017. Tim Janman (London), 27th March 2017. Lord Deben (London), 4th April 2017. Lord Griffths of Fforestfach (London), 6th April 2017. Lord Tebbit (London), 6th April 2017. Sir Adrian Fitzgerald (London), 10th April 2017. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 191 K. Hickson, Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27697-3 192 BIBLIOGRAPHY Edward Norman (telephone), 28th April 2017. Cedric Gunnery (London), 2nd May 2017. Paul Bristol (London), 3rd May 2017. Harvey Thomas (London), 3rd May 2017. Ian Crowther (telephone), 12th May 2017. Iain Duncan Smith MP (London), 4th July 2017. Angela Ellis-Jones (London), 4th July 2017. John Hayes MP (London), 4th July 2017. Dennis Walker (London), 24th July 2017. Lord Howard of Lympne (London), 12th September 2017. -
Room 261 University of London Senate House London, Wcie 7Hu
n :e a c a d e .1C registrar ROOM 261 UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SENATE HOUSE LONDON, WCIE 7HU foi THE EDUCATIONAL POLICIES OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY, 1918-1944 Kevin Jefferys (Bedford College) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ll: JLXN/! ProQuest Number: 10098489 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10098489 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT This thesis sets out to examine the role played by the Conservative Party in the evolution of the state education system between 1918 and 1944. The early chapters provide a chronological account of ministerial policy and party attitudes towards secondary and elementary education between the wars. This is followed by assessments of the party's approach to the dual system of council and church schools, and to the problems of ' education for employment '. The manner in which Conservative education policy operated locally is then examined with particular reference to the area of London; and the arguments put forward are brought together finally by an analysis of the party's responsibility for, and reaction to, the 1944 Education Act. -
Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016). -
Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in British Parliament∗
Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in British Parliament∗ Jonathan B. Slapiny Justin H. Kirklandz Joseph A. Lazzarox [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Patrick A. Leslie{ Tom O'Gradyk [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Strong party discipline is a core feature of Westminster parliamentary systems. Parties typically compel Members of Parliament (MPs) to support the party position regardless of MPs' indi- vidual preferences. Rebellion, however, does occur. Using an original dataset of MP votes and speeches in the British House of Commons from 1992 to 2015, coupled with new estimations of MPs' ideological positions within their party, we find evidence that MPs use rebellion to strategi- cally differentiate themselves from their party. The strategy MPs employ is contingent upon an interaction of ideological extremity with party control of government. Extremists are loyal when their party is in the opposition, but these same extremists become more likely to rebel when their party controls government. Additionally, they emphasize their rebellion through speeches. Existing models of rebellion and party discipline do not account for government agenda control and do not explain these patterns. Keywords: Legislative Politics; Party Loyalty; Ideological Extremity; House of Com- mons ∗We will make the full replication code and data available upon publication of the article. yDepartment of Government, University of Essex zDepartment of Political Science, University of Houston xDepartment of Political Science, University of Houston {Department of Political Science, University of Essex kDepartment of Political Science, MIT 1 Introduction During David Cameron's first term as Conservative Prime Minister, Philip Hollobone | a socially conservative member of the Tory rightwing | was the most rebellious MP in the House of Commons. -
Religious Right
Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britain? Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britian? Andy Walton in Britian? Andy Emerging Right’ ‘Religious a Is there Recent years have seen an increasing number of This report gives a reliable overview of evidence claims that a US-style Religious Right either exists or concerning the purported rise of the Christian is rapidly emerging in Britain. This report examines Right in Britian. Drawing on new research, it profiles Is there a ‘Religious Right’ whether or not the claims are accurate. several new Christian groups. By placing them in context, it shows why rumours that an American- Superficially, it argues, the case looks quite strong: style movement is crossing the Atlantic are greatly there is evidence of greater co-ordination among exaggerated. Christian groups with a strong socially-conservative Emerging in Britain? commitment, in particular relating to human Linda Woodhead, Professor of Sociology of sexuality, marriage, family life, and religious freedom, Religion, Lancaster University about which they are vocal and often willing to resort to legal action. This is a familiar picture within US This is a measured and thoughtful piece of research, politics. contributing to a topic where there is too much heat Andy Walton and too little light in contemporary debate. It assesses However, on closer inspection, research and analysis the presence – or, rather, the current absence – of a suggest that it is highly misleading to describe this coherent ‘Religious Right’ in British politics through with phenomenon as a US-style Religious Right. For a a detailed comparison with the characteristics of the number of reasons – economic, social, ecclesiastical movement in the US. -
The Cornerstone Group
The Cornerstone Group Blog Who we are In the Commons . Press Releases Articles Speeches search go Who we are We are – a group of MPs fighting the corner for a Conservatism founded on "The stone which the builders rejected is become the chief traditional Conservative principles. cornerstone" (Psalm 118:v 22) We believe in – the spiritual values which have informed British institutions, Contact our culture and our nation’s sense of identity for centuries, underpinned by the To become a friend of the belief in a strong nation state. Cornerstone group please e-mail [email protected] We stand for - the Monarchy; traditional marriage; family and community Disclaimer "The views and opinions duties; proper pride in our nation’s distinctive qualities; quality of life over posted on this site and in other soulless utility; social responsibility over personal selfishness; social justice as Cornerstone publications are those civic duty, not state dependency; compassion for those in need; reducing of their author and do not represent a collective position held government waste; lower taxation and deregulation; our ancient liberties by members of the Cornerstone against politically correct censorship and a commitment to our Group. Cornerstone MPs on the Conservative front bench do not democratically elected parliament necessarily endorse any opinions expressed on this site that are not The Cornerstone Group comprises around 40 members of the parliamentary in their own name." Conservative party including those listed below. For more information -
Reshuffle 2014 - the New Government Line Up
Reshuffle 2014 - The new Government line up 1 Whip’s Office Michael Gove MP • New Position: Chief Whip • Previous position: Secretary of State for Education • Entered the House: 2005 • Political Interests: Education, crime, terrorism • Interesting Fact: A member of the winning team in Grampian Television's quiz show Top Club Lord Ashton of Hyde • New Position: Government Whip, House of Lords • Previous position: None • Entered the House: 2011 • Political Interests: Water, banking and finance • Interesting Fact: Gained the rank of Lieutenant with the Royal Wessex Yeomanry Anne Milton MP • New Position: Lord Commissioner, HM Treasury, Whip • Previous position: Parliamentary Under Secretary, Department of Health • Entered the House: 2005 • Political Interests: Environment, health and social care, voluntary sector • Interesting Fact: Worked in the NHS as a Nurse 2 Foreign Office/EU Commissioner Phillip Hammond MP • New Position: Foreign Secretary • Previous position: Secretary of State for Defence • Entered the House: 1997 • Political Interests: Economic policy, international trade, EU, defence • Interesting Fact: Said that if there was a vote now he would consider voting to leave EU Tobias Ellwood MP • New Position: Parliamentary Under Secretary to the Foreign Office • Previous position: Shadow Minister Culture, Media and Sport • Entered the House: 2005 • Political Interests: Defence, education, environment, tourism • Interesting Fact: Was a senior business manager at the London Stock Exchange Lord Hill of Oareford • New Position: EU Commissioner -
Ben Duckworth Investigates Who Belongs on the Right of the Party And
Questions of principle of opinion,” says a member of the government. Since then his judgement has not been trusted by “There are those broadly suspicious of the EU and many in the party. “I’ve still no idea what on earth then there are those who want to leave the EU.” he thought he was doing,” is a common refrain from Personality also plays its part. Prominent anti-EU his colleagues. Davis’ position is symptomatic of MPs Bill Cash and Douglas Carswell do not have a many of ‘old-guard’ of the Tory right. They have friendship. There is also a generational gap between definite qualities – Davis has the charisma and What the older eurosceptics such as Cash and Maas- presence, John Redwood the economic knowl- tricht rebel Richard Shepherd versus the younger, edge – but many resigned or were sacked and are equally well-known right-wingers such as Carswell. seen as having paid a price for their principles. There is also, on other issues, a rough split “The Tory right doesn’t have leaders. It has Below Iain Duncan between right-wingers who are libertarians and standard bearers. They’ve been sacked or not Smith, then leader of the Conservative Party, those who are authoritarian. As one well-known promoted. In some way they wear the scars meets with members ‘trouble-maker’ puts it: “I hate the sexual moralisa- that mean they’re tainted because they can’t of his shadow cabinet: is THE Michael Ancram, Theresa tion made by people in the Cornerstone Group.” get into a position of power,” says an MP. -
Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster: Investigation Report
Allegations child sexual of abuse Westminster to linked Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report Investigation Investigation Report February 2020 February 2020 2020 Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report February 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports CCS1219768174 02/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The following corrections were made to this version of the report on 29 May 2020: Page vii, paragraph 3: was amended to read ‘hand over the same documents’. Page 159 in Annex 1: profession removed, amended to read David Ford Campbell-Chalmers Contents Executive Summary v Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background -
237 Albert, Hans, 152 Allais, Maurice, 29 Allen, R. G. D., 23 American
Index Albert, Hans, 152 Boyle, Andrew, 192 Allais, Maurice, 29 Breuer, Josef, 5 Allen, R. G. D., 23 British Connection (McCormick), 184, American-Austrian School, 2, 8–11 190–4 anarchy, 221–2 British Empire, 32 Ancien Régime, 1, 4 British School, 7, 8, 25, 75 Arrow, Kenneth, 23 Buchanan, James, 29 Attlee, Clement, 52–3, 186 Burgess, Guy, 189 Austrian Institute for Business Cycle Burns, Arthur, 28 Research, 82 Austrian School, 19, 32, 128 Caldwell, Bruce, 43, 57n4, 90 and Hayek, 1–15 The Cambridge Apostles (McCormick), members of, 2, 15–18 194–5 origins of, 2 Cambridge School, 7, 8, 25, 75 rise of, 5 Campbell, Glenn, 181 Ayer, A. J., 217 Cannan, Edwin, 7–8 capitalism, 51, 56, 78, 127, 132 Bartley, William Warren III, 2, 3, capital theory, 4, 66, 74 22, 36–7, 109, 147–209, 213–24, cartels, 36 234–6 Cecil, Robert, 189 biography of Erhard by, 174–7 central planning, 44–50, 66 biography of Popper by, 177–8 Chamberlin, Henry, 50 biography of Wittgenstein by, Chicago School, 25, 26, 27, 132 171–4 Churchill, Winston, 52–3 break with Christianity by, 159–62 citations, 61–5, 67–9 Collected Works, 196–202 classical economics, 3–4, 36, and Hayek, 178–202 77, 128 and justificationism, 213–18 Coase, Ronald, 24–6, 29 and Lakatos, 162–71, 200, 202 Coase Theorem, 24–5 and Popper, 162–71, 177–8, 200, Cold War, 1, 29 202, 213–14, 216 The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek Bass model, 63–5, 68 (Bartley), 2, 196–202, 229–30 Battle of Solferino, 5 communism, 5, 49, 186 Becker, Gary, 29 The Communist Manifesto (Marx and Belcredi, Richard, 15 Engels), 4, 5 Besters, Hans, 101, 102 competition, 98, 131–2, 135 Beveridge, William, 28, 51 Conservative party, 55 Beves, Donald, 186–7 The Constitution of Liberty Bismarck, Otto von, 4, 127 (Hayek), 49 Block, Walter, 99 constructivist rationalists, 214 Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von, 2, 4, 11, Cox, Archibald, 179 16–17 critical rationalists, 218 Bork, Robert, 35 Cubitt, C.