DOCSLIB.ORG

A Rhetorical History of the British Constitution of Israel, 1917-1948

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A RHETORICAL HISTORY OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION OF ISRAEL, 1917-1948 by BENJAMIN ROSWELL BATES (Under the Direction of Celeste Condit) ABSTRACT The Arab-Israeli conflict has long been presented as eternal and irresolvable. A rhetorical history argues that the standard narrative can be challenged by considering it a series of rhetorical problems. These rhetorical problems can be reconstructed by drawing on primary sources as well as publicly presented texts. A methodology for doing rhetorical history that draws on Michael Calvin McGee's fragmentation thesis is offered. Four theoretical concepts (the archive, institutional intent, peripheral text, and center text) are articulated. British Colonial Office archives, London Times coverage, and British Parliamentary debates are used to interpret four publicly presented rhetorical acts. In 1915-7, Britain issued the Balfour Declaration and the McMahon-Hussein correspondence. Although these documents are treated as promises in the standard narrative, they are ambiguous declarations. As ambiguous documents, these texts offer opportunities for constitutive readings as well as limiting interpretations. In 1922, the Mandate for Palestine was issued to correct this vagueness. Rather than treating the Mandate as a response to the debate between realist foreign policy and self-determination, Winston Churchill used epideictic rhetoric to foreclose a policy discussion in favor of a vote on Britain's honour. As such, the Mandate did not account for Wilsonian drives in the post-War international sphere. After Arab riots and boycotts highlighted this problem, a commission was appointed to investigate new policy approaches. In the White Paper of 1939, a rhetoric of investigation limited Britain's consideration of possible policies. By extending investigation to the limits of kairos, advocates of partition formulated policy without discussing other potential solutions. At the expiration of the White Paper, Britain withdrew from Palestine. As such, in 1947, the United Nations issued Resolution 181 to divide Palestine into two states. United Nations action was possible only because Britain articulated a rhetoric of failure and an end to Empire. None of these four policies was a panacea; each may have enhanced the problem of Palestine. In the conclusion, lessons from Britain's experience are applied to the current American approach to Palestine. Centering George W. Bush's Rose Garden Speech, and drawing on the Mitchell Commission Report and the Tenet Plan, indicates that consideration of ambiguity, epideictic rhetoric, rhetorics of investigation, and rhetorics of failure should be made when evaluating peace proposals. INDEX WORDS: Rhetorical history, Palestine, British Empire, Middle East, Late colonial period, Interwar decolonization. A RHETORICAL HISTORY OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION OF ISRAEL, 1917-1948 by BENJAMIN ROSWELL BATES B.A., The University of Richmond, 1998 M.A., The University of Georgia, 2000 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2003 © 2003 Benjamin Roswell Bates All Rights Reserved A RHETORICAL HISTORY OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION OF ISRAEL, 1917-1948 by BENJAMIN ROSWELL BATES Major Professor: Celeste Condit Committee: Thomas Lessl John Murphy Kevin DeLuca Loch Johnson Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2003 iv DEDICATION Turn from evil and do good; seek peace and pursue it – Psalm 34:14 Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God. – Matthew 5:9 If they should incline to peace, you shall also incline to it, and put your trust in God. – al-Anfal 8:61 To those who have lived and died for peace. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A Rhetorical History Of The British Constitution Of Israel, 1917-1948 officially began at the University of Georgia library on May 17, 2001. That day, I removed my first cubic foot of books from the shelf labeled DS 101 and began reading. The dissertation was formally proposed in September 2002 in Terrell Hall, Room 117. More reading followed. Drafts of the project were turned in, turned around, and turned back. The proje ct ends (for now) on March 27, 2003 in Terrell Hall, Room 116. These are the dates for the formal course of this project. The informal course of the project has been much longer. I have been interested in the events of the modern Middle East since at least fifth grade. This project began in a social studies class. The assignment was simple: write an essay about an issue in the news that is five paragraphs in length and uses three sources. One could say that the first draft of this dissertation was based on an article in Time, an editorial in Newsweek , and a fragment from the Portland Press Herald. From fifth grade to twenty-first grade (as the third year of the Ph.D. should be called), I have believed two things. First, the Israeli/Palestinian conflict can be resolved. Second, I can contribute toward that resolution. In these 16 years, I hope that the arguments in support of these beliefs have matured more than I have. Over these 16 years, many people have contributed to the development of this project. Some contributions have been direct, others, less so. The encouragement, conversation, criticism, and support (material and otherwise) offered by some have been particularly valuable. Naturally, I thank my doctoral committee. Celeste Condit has served as a model for the academic ideal: invested in research, teaching, and mentorship to construct a more just world for all humankind. She has emphasized the importance of productive distractions and of reading trashy science fiction, both equally important to maintaining balance in the completion of a long project. If I can achieve half the excellence in half the endeavors that she has, I will consider myself a vi success. For five years, Thomas Lessl has been a close reader, a fair critic, and a fellow lover of the archive. Kevin DeLuca has always asked, "What's the point?" at the most opportune times (and occasionally supplied an answer as well). Bonnie Dow lent me books and ideas early on and recognized the imperative of Kenny Rogers' famous lyrics nearer the end. John Murphy has twice intervened to ensure that this degree could be completed – once to allow me to attain the required number of SPCM credits and once to ensure that my doctoral committee would have five members. Loch Johnson has always urged practical solutions in the analysis of international policy. As he puts it, "any ornery mule can kick down a barn; building one is harder." With the advice of these six women and men, perhaps a more stable barn has been built. I have also received support form the University in this project. The Graduate School has been decent enough to offer me a Dissertation Completion Fellowship, a funding structure that has allowed me to concentrate on writing in this final year. Virginia Feher, of the UGA Interlibrary Loan Department, was instrumental in saving me a regular commute to Emory University by calling in some 50 rolls of microfilm to Georgia so I could read them here. Eric Nitschke, of the Emory Government Documents Department, ensured that the correct reels would arrive. I would also like to thank those who guided me to rhetorical studies. I once wanted to be (believe it or not) a lawyer. I was helpfully derailed from this goal by influences early in my academic career. Jane Laughlin, my debate coach at Scarborough (Maine) High School, provided me with my initial entry into the world that would become rhetorical studies. Sheila Carapico, of the Middle East Research Institute and the University of Richmond, was instrumental in blending my interests in the Middle East with my desire for social justice. Sara Cornett and Lisa Heller furthered my conversion at Richmond, and David Thomas and Scott Johnson completed this necessary task. By a confluence of class schedules and a genuine love for communication studies, they convinced me to continue on to graduate school. vii There are also many former, present, and future graduate (or law or medicine) students, at Georgia and elsewhere, who have been of vital assistance. The reasons are many and varied; each likely know s how she or he has helped me remain (mostly) sane. They include (and in no order of importance): Tonya Couch, Nneka Ofulue , Kristy Maddux, Kristan Poirot, Michelle Hucher, Ken Rufo, Windy Lawrence, Patrick Oliver, Hollis Marshall West, Kelly Dorgan, Ryan Galloway, Michael Davis, Tasha Dubriwny, John Lynch, Ilon Lauer, Christina Morus, Patricia Kelley, Davi Johnson, Jen Bevan, Amy Carskadon, Michael Geiser, and Kristin Brown. Last, but certainly not least, has been my family. My father, mother, and brother have encouraged me to seek truth, act justly, and love humanity's potential. I have not always done so. With their help in the future, I hope to be able to say that I have. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.....................................................................................................v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................1 2 HISTORY, RHETORIC, METHODOLOGY ....................................................... 48 3 THE BALFOUR DECLARATION AND THE MCMAHON HUSSEIN CORRESPONDENCE ................................................................................... 96 4 THE MANDATE FOR PALESTINE................................................................
Recommended publications
  • ORIGINS of the PALESTINE MANDATE by Adam Garfinkle

    ORIGINS of the PALESTINE MANDATE by Adam Garfinkle

    NOVEMBER 2014 ORIGINS OF THE PALESTINE MANDATE By Adam Garfinkle Adam Garfinkle, Editor of The American Interest Magazine, served as the principal speechwriter to Secretary of State Colin Powell. He has also been editor of The National Interest and has taught at Johns Hopkins University’s School for Advanced International Studies (SAIS), the University of Pennsylvania, Haverford College and other institutions of higher learning. An alumnus of FPRI, he currently serves on FPRI’s Board of Advisors. This essay is based on a lecture he delivered to FPRI’s Butcher History Institute on “Teaching about Israel and Palestine,” October 25-26, 2014. A link to the the videofiles of each lecture can be found here: http://www.fpri.org/events/2014/10/teaching-about- israel-and-palestine Like everything else historical, the Palestine Mandate has a history with a chronological beginning, a middle, and, in this case, an end. From a strictly legal point of view, that beginning was September 29, 1923, and the end was midnight, May 14, 1948, putting the middle expanse at just short of 25 years. But also like everything else historical, it is no simple matter to determine either how far back in the historical tapestry to go in search of origins, or how far to lean history into its consequences up to and speculatively beyond the present time. These decisions depend ultimately on the purposes of an historical inquiry and, whatever historical investigators may say, all such inquiries do have purposes, whether recognized, admitted, and articulated or not. A.J.P. Taylor’s famous insistence that historical analysis has no purpose other than enlightened storytelling, rendering the entire enterprise much closer to literature than to social science, is interesting precisely because it is such an outlier perspective among professional historians.
  • Forming a Nucleus for the Jewish State

    Forming a Nucleus for the Jewish State

    Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................... 3 Jewish Settlements 70 CE - 1882 ......................................................... 4 Forming a Nucleus for First Aliyah (1882-1903) ...................................................................... 5 Second Aliyah (1904-1914) .................................................................. 7 the Jewish State: Third Aliyah (1919-1923) ..................................................................... 9 First and Second Aliyot (1882-1914) ................................................ 11 First, Second, and Third Aliyot (1882-1923) ................................... 12 1882-1947 Fourth Aliyah (1924-1929) ................................................................ 13 Fifth Aliyah Phase I (1929-1936) ...................................................... 15 First to Fourth Aliyot (1882-1929) .................................................... 17 Dr. Kenneth W. Stein First to Fifth Aliyot Phase I (1882-1936) .......................................... 18 The Peel Partition Plan (1937) ........................................................... 19 Tower and Stockade Settlements (1936-1939) ................................. 21 The Second World War (1940-1945) ................................................ 23 Postwar (1946-1947) ........................................................................... 25 11 Settlements of October 5-6 (1947) ............................................... 27 First
  • The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin

    The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin

    THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND ZIONISM: 1917 - 1947 FRED LENNIS LEPKIN BA., University of British Columbia, 196 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ Fred Lepkin 1986 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1986 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Name : Fred Lennis Lepkin Degree: M. A. Title of thesis: The British Labour Party and Zionism, - Examining Committee: J. I. Little, Chairman Allan B. CudhgK&n, ior Supervisor . 5- - John Spagnolo, ~upervis&y6mmittee Willig Cleveland, Supepiso$y Committee -Lenard J. Cohen, External Examiner, Associate Professor, Political Science Dept.,' Simon Fraser University Date Approved: August 11, 1986 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917 - 1947.
  • Copyright by John Michael Meyer 2020

    Copyright by John Michael Meyer 2020

    Copyright by John Michael Meyer 2020 The Dissertation Committee for John Michael Meyer Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Dissertation. One Way to Live: Orde Wingate and the Adoption of ‘Special Forces’ Tactics and Strategies (1903-1944) Committee: Ami Pedahzur, Supervisor Zoltan D. Barany David M. Buss William Roger Louis Thomas G. Palaima Paul B. Woodruff One Way to Live: Orde Wingate and the Adoption of ‘Special Forces’ Tactics and Strategies (1903-1944) by John Michael Meyer Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2020 Dedication To Ami Pedahzur and Wm. Roger Louis who guided me on this endeavor from start to finish and To Lorna Paterson Wingate Smith. Acknowledgements Ami Pedahzur and Wm. Roger Louis have helped me immeasurably throughout my time at the University of Texas, and I wish that everyone could benefit from teachers so rigorous and open minded. I will never forget the compassion and strength that they demonstrated over the course of this project. Zoltan Barany developed my skills as a teacher, and provided a thoughtful reading of my first peer-reviewed article. David M. Buss kept an open mind when I approached him about this interdisciplinary project, and has remained a model of patience while I worked towards its completion. My work with Tom Palaima and Paul Woodruff began with collaboration, and then moved to friendship. Inevitably, I became their student, though they had been teaching me all along.
  • Turkmen of Iraq

    Turkmen of Iraq

    Turkmen of Iraq By Mofak Salman Kerkuklu 1 Mofak Salman Kerkuklu Turkmen of Iraq Dublin –Ireland- 2007 2 The Author Mofak Salman Kerkuklu graduated in England with a BSc Honours in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Oxford Brookes University and completed MSc’s in both Medical Electronic and Physics at London University and a MSc in Computing Science and Information Technology at South Bank University. He is also a qualified Charter Engineer from the Institution of Engineers of Ireland. Mr. Mofak Salman is an author of a book “ Brief History of Iraqi Turkmen”. He is the Turkmeneli Party representative for both Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom. He has written a large number of articles that were published in various newspapers. 3 Purpose and Scope This book was written with two clear objectives. Firstly, to make an assessment of the current position of Turkmen in Iraq, and secondly, to draw the world’s attention to the situation of the Turkmen. This book would not have been written without the support of Turkmen all over the world. I wish to reveal to the world the political situation and suffering of the Iraqi Turkmen under the Iraqi regime, and to expose Iraqi Kurdish bandits and reveal their premeditated plan to change the demography of the Turkmen-populated area. I would like to dedicate this book to every Turkmen who has been detained in Iraqi prisons; to Turkmen who died under torture in Iraqi prisons; to all Turkmen whose sons and daughters were executed by the Iraqi regime; to all Turkmen who fought and died without seeing a free Turkmen homeland; and to the Turkmen City of Kerkuk, which is a bastion of cultural and political life for the Turkmen resisting the Kurdish occupation.
  • Information Issued by the Association of Jewish Refugees in Great Britain • Fairfax Mansions

    Information Issued by the Association of Jewish Refugees in Great Britain • Fairfax Mansions

    Vol. XVII No. 7 July, 1962 INFORMATION ISSUED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH REFUGEES IN GREAT BRITAIN • FAIRFAX MANSIONS. FINCHLEY RD. (corner Fairfax Rd.). London. N.W.I Offset and ConMuUiitg Hours: Telephone: MAIda Vale 9096/7 (General OIkce and Welfare tor tha Aged) Moi\day to Thursday 10 a.in.—I p.m. 3—6 p.m MAIda Vale 4449 (Employment Agency, annually licensed bv the L.C.C,, and Social Services Dept.) Friday 10 ajn.—l p.m. Ernst Kahn Austrian baroque civilisation, tried to cope with their situation. Schnitzler, more fortunate than Weininger, if only through his exterior circum­ stances, knew much about the psychological struc­ THE YOUNG GENERATION CARRIES ON ture of Viennese middle-class s(Kiety and Jewry. The twilight, uncertainly and loneliness of the human soul attracted him, but his erotism is half- Sixth Year Book of the Leo Baeck Institute playful, half-sorrowful and does not deceive him about the truth that ". to write means to sit Those amongst us who remember our German- To some extent these achievements were due to in judgment over one's self". It enabled him to Jewish past are bound to wonder who will carry the Rabbi's charm which attracted Polish Jews objectivise the inner struggles of Jews who sought On with the elucidation of the relevant problems and German high-ranking officers and aristocrats the " Way into the Open ", i.e., into assimilation in once the older witnesses are no longer available. alike with whom he collaborated very closely. its different forms. The Year Book 1961* brings this home to us by This went so far that the German officials called Weininger.
  • Britain's Broken Promises: the Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian

    Britain's Broken Promises: the Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian

    Britain’s Broken Promises: The Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian Conflict Overview Students will learn about British control over Palestine after World War I and how it influenced the Israel‐Palestine situation in the modern Middle East. The material will be introduced through a timeline activity and followed by a PowerPoint that covers many of the post‐WWI British policies. The lesson culminates in a letter‐writing project where students have to support a position based upon information learned. Grade 9 NC Essential Standards for World History • WH.1.1: Interpret data presented in time lines and create time lines • WH.1.3: Consider multiple perspectives of various peoples in the past • WH.5.3: Analyze colonization in terms of the desire for access to resources and markets as well as the consequences on indigenous cultures, population, and environment • WH.7.3: Analyze economic and political rivalries, ethnic and regional conflicts, and nationalism and imperialism as underlying causes of war Materials • “Steps Toward Peace in Israel and Palestine” Timeline (excerpt attached) • History of Israel/Palestine Timeline Questions and Answer Key, attached • Drawing paper or chart paper • Colored pencils or crayons (optional) • “Britain’s Broken Promises” PowerPoint, available in the Database of K‐12 Resources (in PDF format) o To view this PDF as a projectable presentation, save the file, click “View” in the top menu bar of the file, and select “Full Screen Mode” o To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to
  • Soft Power Or Illusion of Hegemony: the Case of the Turkish Soap Opera “Colonialism”

    Soft Power Or Illusion of Hegemony: the Case of the Turkish Soap Opera “Colonialism”

    International Journal of Communication 7 (2013), 2361-2385 1932–8036/20130005 Soft Power or Illusion of Hegemony: The Case of the Turkish Soap Opera “Colonialism” ZAFER YÖRÜK PANTELIS VATIKIOTIS Izmir University of Economics The article develops two simultaneous arguments; one is theoretical, and the other is analytic. The theoretical argument is based on an assessment of the utility of the concept of “soft power” in comparison to the Gramscian concept of hegemony in understanding the developments in the recent regional power games in the geographical area consisting of Eastern Europe and the near and Middle East. The analytic argument examines the popularity of Turkish soap operas, both among a cross-cultural audience and within the wider context of cultural, economic, and political influences, and in so doing, it points out challenges and limits for Turkey’s regional power. Introduction This article notes the recent boom in the popularity of Turkish soap operas in the Middle East, the Balkans, and some (predominantly “Turkic”) former Soviet Republics in Asia, and examines the discourse of Turkish “soft power” that has developed upon this cultural development. The research focuses here on the analysis of two case studies—of the Middle East and Greece— where the Turkish series are very popular. Both cases are able to contribute different perspectives and explanations of this “cultural penetration” across both sides of a geographical area containing Eastern Europe and the near and Middle East, evaluating Turkey’s “influence” accordingly.1 1 In this regard, the limits of the analysis of the present study are set. Although a general framework of the perception of the Turkish series is provided along both case studies (popularity; aspirations and identifications), further research is needed in order to provide a detailed account of the impact of Turkish series on the related societies.
  • The Histadrut, Was Conspicuous Employment Uncertainty, and the General Feeling That by Its Absence

    The Histadrut, Was Conspicuous Employment Uncertainty, and the General Feeling That by Its Absence

    Dogged by history Why Israel’s powerful labour federation was rejected by the 2011 social protest movement JONATHAN PREMINGER Dr Jonathan Preminger completed his doctoral research into labour relations in Israel under the supervision of Professor Uri Ram at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. He is now a British Academy Newton International Fellow at Cardiff University, where he is continuing his research into the political economy of Israel, focusing on the shipping industry, with Professor Helen Sampson. He is also preparing a book on Israel’s recent wave of unionising. or a few heady months in the summer of 2011, it seemed Israeli society was about to change com- pletely. Walking along Tel Aviv’s leafy Rothschild F Figure 1 Boulevard, among hundreds of tents, discussion groups, The social protest movement in Tel Aviv, 2011: colourful, cacophonous, speakers, soup kitchens, banners, drummers and jugg- diverse. Photo: ActiveStills. lers, I was amazed by the energy and optimism – swept away by the sense that this grassroots struggle was far the largest labour organisation in Israel, with strong making an impact (Figure 1). This was our Arab Spring, workers’ committees in key industries who are able to our Indignados, our Occupy Wall Street – and we were bring the economy to a standstill if they choose. doing it bigger, louder, more democratically and more Indeed, the social protest movement erupted in the colourfully than anyone else. middle of another, quieter sea-change. From around 2007 At that time I had already been researching labour onwards, Israel saw a wave of trade union organising representation in Israel for a couple of years, and was drives and labour struggles, some of which were very interested to see that two relatively new general unions, high profile and received widespread media coverage.
  • TITLE the Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: Proble

    TITLE the Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: Proble

    https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/ TITLE The implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of conquest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917–1936) AUTHOR Regan, Bernard DATE DEPOSITED 13 April 2016 This version available at https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/id/eprint/1009/ COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Archive makes this work available, in accordance with publisher policies, for research purposes. VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. For citation purposes, please consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication. The Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of con- quest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperi- alism (1917–1936) Regan, Bernard (2016) The Implementation of the Balfour Dec- laration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of con- quest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917– 1936) University of Surrey Version: PhD thesis Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individ- ual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open- Research Archive’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult http:// research.stmarys.ac.uk/policies.html http://research.stmarys.ac.uk/ The Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of conquest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917–1936) Thesis submitted by Bernard Regan For the award of Doctor of Philosophy School of Arts and Humanities University of Surrey January 2016 ©Bernard Regan 2016 1 Summary The objective of this thesis is to analyse the British Mandate in Palestine with a view to developing a new understanding of the interconnections and dissonances between the principal agencies.
  • Israel's Rights As a Nation-State in International Diplomacy

    Israel's Rights As a Nation-State in International Diplomacy

    Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Institute for Research and Policy המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( ISRAEl’s RiGHTS as a Nation-State in International Diplomacy Israel’s Rights as a Nation-State in International Diplomacy © 2011 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs – World Jewish Congress Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel Tel. 972-2-561-9281 Fax. 972-2-561-9112 Email: [email protected] www.jcpa.org World Jewish Congress 9A Diskin Street, 5th Floor Kiryat Wolfson, Jerusalem 96440 Phone : +972 2 633 3000 Fax: +972 2 659 8100 Email: [email protected] www.worldjewishcongress.com Academic Editor: Ambassador Alan Baker Production Director: Ahuva Volk Graphic Design: Studio Rami & Jaki • www.ramijaki.co.il Cover Photos: Results from the United Nations vote, with signatures, November 29, 1947 (Israel State Archive) UN General Assembly Proclaims Establishment of the State of Israel, November 29, 1947 (Israel National Photo Collection) ISBN: 978-965-218-100-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Overview Ambassador Alan Baker .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 The National Rights of Jews Professor Ruth Gavison ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 “An Overwhelmingly Jewish State” - From the Balfour Declaration to the Palestine Mandate
  • London Metropolitan Archives Board of Deputies

    London Metropolitan Archives Board of Deputies

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BOARD OF DEPUTIES OF BRITISH JEWS ACC/3121 Reference Description Dates BOARD MINUTES Minute books ACC/3121/A/001/A Minute book 1 1760 Nov - Not available for general access Original volume not available for consultation, 1828 Apr Available only with advance please see microfilm copy at English and notice and at the discretion of the ACC/3121/A/001/C Portuguese LMA Director 1 volume Please see microfilm available within archive collection: order ACC/3121/A/001/C ACC/3121/A/001/B Minute book 2 1829 Mar - Unfit Original volume not available for consultation. 1838 Jan Not available for general access Please see microfilm copy at English and Available only with advance ACC/3121/A/001/C Portuguese notice and at the discretion of the 1 volume LMA Director Please see microfilm available within archive collection: order ACC/3121/A/001/C ACC/3121/A/001/C Minutes (on microfilm) 1760-1838 access by written permission only This microfilm contains the first two volumes of English and minutes for the Board covering: Portuguese volume 1: 1760-1828 volume 2: 1829-1838 1 microfilm ACC/3121/A/001/D Minute book 3 1838-1840 access by written permission only 1 volume English and Former Reference: ACC/3121/A/5/3 Portuguese ACC/3121/A/001/E Minute book 4 1840 - 1841 access by written permission only 1 volume Former Reference: ACC/3121/A/5/4 ACC/3121/A/001/F Minute book 5: appendices include some half- 1841-1846 access by written permission only yearly reports, memos and opinions.