DOCSLIB.ORG

Accidentology of Tramways

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accidentology of Tramways REPORTS Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy MEDDE – DGITM Technical Office for Mechanical Lifts and Guided Transport Systems (STRMTG) Tram Division March 2015 ACCIDENTOLOGY OF TRAMWAYS Analysis of reported events – year 2013 – evolution 2004 – 2013 Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement Durable et de l’Énergie http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr History of document versions Version Date Commentaire 0.1 March 2015 Version 1 Case followed by Valérie de Labonnefon - STRMTG Tel. : +33 4 76 63 78 78 / Fax : +33 4 76 42 39 33 E-mail: [email protected] Authors Valérie DE LABONNEFON – tram Division Jean-Michel PASSELAIGUE – tram Division (requests, graphics and translation) Contents 1 -REMINDER ON THE DATABASE CONSTRUCTION...........................................................................6 1.1 -Fields in the database........................................................................................................................6 1.2 -Codification of tram lines....................................................................................................................6 1.3 -Events data........................................................................................................................................6 2 -SCOPE OF STUDY...............................................................................................................................7 2.1 -Systems in operation..........................................................................................................................7 2.2 -Systems analysed..............................................................................................................................7 2.3 -Evolution of the systems analysed.....................................................................................................8 3 -RESULTS..............................................................................................................................................9 3.1 -General..............................................................................................................................................9 3.1.1 -Overall data for 2013.............................................................................................................................................................................................9 3.1.2 -Remarks concerning the victims...........................................................................................................................................................................9 3.1.3 -Remarks concerning the events............................................................................................................................................................................9 3.2 -Events..............................................................................................................................................11 3.2.1 -Breakdown by type – evolution 2004-2013.........................................................................................................................................................11 3.2.2 -Event monitoring indicator - comparison with bus systems...............................................................................................................................12 3.3 -Events – analysis of "STPG lines"....................................................................................................13 3.3.1 -Introduction – definition of panel.........................................................................................................................................................................13 3.3.2 -STPG lines – event monitoring indicator.............................................................................................................................................................13 3.4 -Breakdown of victims........................................................................................................................14 3.4.1 -Year 2013.............................................................................................................................................................................................................14 3.4.2 -2004-2013 evolution............................................................................................................................................................................................15 3.4.3 -Monitoring of victims indicators...........................................................................................................................................................................19 3.5 -Serious events..................................................................................................................................20 3.5.1 -2004-2013 evolution............................................................................................................................................................................................20 3.5.2 -STPG lines - serious events................................................................................................................................................................................20 4 -COLLISIONS WITH THIRD PARTIES................................................................................................21 4.1 -Breakdown by third parties...............................................................................................................21 4.1.1 -Year 2013.............................................................................................................................................................................................................21 4.1.2 -2004-2013 evolution............................................................................................................................................................................................21 4.2 -Causes of collisions - 2004-2013 evolution......................................................................................23 4.2.1 -Disrespect for traffic signals.................................................................................................................................................................................23 4.2.2 -Special circumstance - tram coming from the opposite direction while crossing a first one.............................................................................23 4.3 -Monitoring of collisions indicators.....................................................................................................24 4.3.1 -Collisions at the beginning of operating..............................................................................................................................................................25 FRANCE - ACCIDENTOLOGY OF TRAMWAYS – Analysis of reported events – March 2015 3/46 4.4 -Consequences of collisions - 2004-2013 evolution...........................................................................26 4.4.1 -Material consequences - Derailment...................................................................................................................................................................26 4.4.2 -Aggravating factors..............................................................................................................................................................................................26 5 -ANALYSIS OF CONFIGURATIONS...................................................................................................28 5.1 -Breakdown of collisions according to predefined configurations.......................................................28 5.1.1 -Evolution of the breakdown of collisions for 2004-2013.....................................................................................................................................28 5.1.2 -Evolution of the breakdown of victims from collisions 2004-2013.....................................................................................................................29 5.1.3 -Relative breakdown of collisions according to configuration..............................................................................................................................29 5.2 -Overall analysis of various configurations of intersections................................................................30 5.2.1 -All intersections....................................................................................................................................................................................................31 5.2.2 -Simple crossing intersection................................................................................................................................................................................32 5.2.3 -Resident's access................................................................................................................................................................................................33 5.2.4 -Simple junction with turn left/right........................................................................................................................................................................34 5.2.5 -Roundabouts and gyratories...............................................................................................................................................................................37
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning and Design Implications from Traffic Safety Evaluation for Tramway Systems
    Ulla Saari Planning and design implications from traffic safety evaluation for tramway systems Thesis submitted for examination for the degree of Master of Science in Technology. Espoo 18.2.2019 Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Milos N. Mladenovic, PhD Advisor: M. Sc. Davy Beilinson Aalto University, P.O. BOX 11000, 00076 AALTO www.aalto.fi Abstract of master's thesis Author Ulla Saari Title of thesis Planning and design implications from traffic safety evaluation for tramway systems Master programme Spatial Planning and Transportation Code ENG26 Engineering Thesis supervisor Milos Mladenovic Thesis advisor(s) Davy Beilinson Date 18.2.2019 Number of pages 99 Language English Abstract Modern tramways are a part of traffic system for urban and densifying city structure. First modern tramways are planned nowadays in Finland. Planning and design create a base for a safe traffic system. Traffic safety influences on our everyday life and is a requirement for a well-functioning and efficient transport system and city structure. This thesis concentrates on planning and design of tramway systems from traffic safety point of view. In this thesis, traffic safety for tramway systems is studied by using accident data from Helsinki, Gothenburg and Dublin. GIS-analysis, data analysis, conflict point maps and previous studies are used to identify design factors influencing tramway safety. Based on the accident data, specific points of infrastructure are considered in terms of safety. Planning and design solutions are considered for motor vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists. Safety in design is studied for intersections, crossing points and tram stop areas. Clarity of the traffic system is a key factor for safe environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future Accident and Impact Scenarios for Pedestrians and Cyclists WP Number: 4
    N Current and future accident and impact scenarios for pedestrians and cyclists WP Number: 4 WP Title: Vulnerable Road User Protection Deliverable D4.1 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 768960. Current and future accident and impact scenarios for pedestrians and cyclists Work Package 4, Deliverable 4.1. Please Refer to this Report as Follows: Klug, Corina; Leo, Christoph; Schachner, Martin; Rizzi, Maria; Grumert, Ellen; Davidse, Ragnhild; Heinzl, Philipp; Iancovici, Sava; Wågström, Linus; Lindman, Magdalena; Thomson, Robert; Linder, Astrid (2020). Current and future accident and impact scenarios for pedestrians and cyclists, Deliverable 4.1. of the H2020 project VIRTUAL. Project details: Project start date: 01/06/2018 Duration: 48 months Project name: Open access virtual testing protocols for enhanced road user safety – VIRTUAL Coordinator: Astrid Linder, Adj Prof, PhD – Research Director Traffic Safety Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI) Regnbågsgatan 1, 417 55 Gothenburg, Sweden This project has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 768960. Deliverable details: Version: Final Dissemination level: PU (Public) Due date: 31/07/2019 Submission date: 31/03/2020 Online location: - Lead Contractor for this Deliverable: VTI, TU Graz Report Author(s): Corina Klug, Christoph Leo, Martin Schachner (TU Graz) Ellen Grumert, Maria Rizzi, Astrid Linder (VTI) Philipp Heinzl (Siemens) Ragnhild Davidse (SWOV) Sava Iancovici, Linus Wågstöm, Magdalena Lindman, (Volvo) Reviewer: Robert Thomson (Chalmers), Sweden VIRTUAL | Milestone Report D4.1 | WP 4 | Final i Legal Disclaimer All information in this document is provided "as is" and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Format Acrobat
    N° 88 SÉNAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 1996-1997 Annexe tu procès-verbal de la séance du 21 novembre 1996. AVIS PRÉSENTÉ au nom de la commission des Affaires économiques et du Plan (1) sur le projet de loi de finances pour 1997, ADOPTÉ PAR L'ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE, TOME XVIII TRANSPORTS TERRESTRES Par M. Georges BERCHET, Sénateur. (1) Cette commission est composée de : MM. Jean François-Poncet, président ; Gérard Larcher, Henri Revol, Jean Huchon, Fernand Tardy, Gérard César, Louis Minetti, vice-présidents ; Georges Berchet, William Chervy, Jean-Paul Émin, Louis Moinard, secrétaires ; Louis Althapé, Alphonse Arzel, Mme Janine Bardou, MM. Bernard Barraux, Michel Bécot, Jean Besson, Claude Billard, Marcel Bony, Jean Boyer, Jacques Braconnier, Gérard Braun. Dominique Braye, Michel Charzat, Marcel-Pierre Cleach, Roland Courteau, Désiré Debavelaere, Gérard Delfau, Fernand Demilly, Marcel Deneux, Rodolphe Désiré, Jacques Dominati, Michel Doublet. Mme Josette Durrieu, MM. Bernard Dussaut, Jean-Paul Émorine, Léon Fatous, Hilaire Flandre, Philippe François, Aubert Garcia, François Gerbaud, Charles Ginésy, Jean Grandon, Francis Grignon, Georges Gruillot, Claude Haut, Mme Anne Heinis, MM. Pierre Hérisson, Rémi Herment, Bernard Hugo, Bernard Joly, Edmond Lauret, Jean-François Le Grand, Félix Leyzour, Kléber Malécot, Jacques de Menou, Louis Mercier, Mme Lucette Michaux-Chevry, MM. Jean-Marc Pastor, Jean Pépin, Daniel Percheron, Jean Peyrafitte, Alain Pluchet, Jean Pourchet, Jean Puech, Paul Raoult, Jean-Marie Rausch, Charles Revet, Roger Rigaudière, Roger Rinchet, Jean-Jacques Robert, Jacques Rocca Serra, Josselin de Rohan, René Rouquet, Raymond Soucaret, Michel Souplet, André Vallet, Jean-Pierre Vial. Voir les numéros : Assemblée nationale (l0ème législ.) : 2993. 3030 à 3035 et TA. 590. Sénat: 85 et 86 (annexe n° 18) (1996-1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Sas Ile Folien Amenagement De L'ile Folien a Valenciennes (59)
    Aménagement de l’Ile Folien – Valenciennes (59) S.A.S. Ile Folien Etude d’impact sur l’environnement S.A.S. ILE FOLIEN AMENAGEMENT DE L’ILE FOLIEN A VALENCIENNES (59) Etude d’impact sur l’environnement 11010018-V1 Version 4 du 05/07/2016 1 Aménagement de l’Ile Folien – Valenciennes (59) S.A.S. Ile Folien Etude d’impact sur l’environnement 11010018-V1 2 Version 4 du 05/07/2016 Aménagement de l’Ile Folien – Valenciennes (59) S.A.S. Ile Folien Etude d’impact sur l’environnement SOMMAIRE CHAPITRE 6. COUTS COLLECTIFS DES POLLUTIONS ET NUISANCES ET DES AVANTAGES INDUITS POUR LA COLLECTIVITE ..................................... 203 CHAPITRE 1. RESUME NON TECHNIQUE .......................................... 9 CHAPITRE 7. ANALYSE EFFETS NEGATIFS ET POSITIFS, DIRECTS ET INDIRECTS, TEMPORAIRES ET PERMANENTS A COURT MOYEN ET LONG TERME ET DES MESURES , , PRISES POUR REDUIRE, SUPPRIMER OU COMPENSER ............................... 205 CHAPITRE 2. CADRE REGLEMENTAIRE .......................................... 19 7.1 IMPACTS, MESURES, SUIVIS ET COUTS LIES AU MILIEU PHYSIQUE ................ 206 2.1 CONTEXTE REGLEMENTAIRE .................................................... 20 7.2 IMPACTS, MESURES ET COUTS LIES AU PATRIMOINE NATUREL ................... 214 2.2 LES TEXTES .................................................................... 21 7.3 IMPACTS, MESURES, SUIVI ET COUTS LIES A LA SANTE, AU CADRE DE VIE, AUX RISQUES ET AUX POLLUTIONS.................................................. 232 7.4 IMPACTS, MESURES, SUIVI ET COUTS LIES AU MILIEU HUMAIN
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Accidents and Injuries to Road Transport Drivers TE--WE-10-004-EN-N
    ISSN 1831-9351 A review of accidents and injuries to road transport drivers TE--WE-10-004-EN-N TE--WE-10-004-EN-N Authors European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) Sarah Copsey (project manager) Members of EU-OSHA Topic Centre – Working Environment Nicola Christie, RCPH, UK Linda Drupsteen, TNO, The Netherlands Jakko van Kampen, TNO, The Netherlands Lottie Kuijt-Evers, TNO, The Netherlands Ellen Schmitz-Felten, KOOP, Germany Marthe Verjans, Prevent, Belgium Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers, or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found on the cover of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010 ISBN -13: 978-92-9191-355-8 doi:10.2802/39714 © European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2010 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. A REVIEW OF ACCIDENTS AND INJURIES TO ROAD TRANSPORT DRIVERS A review of accidents and injuries to road transport drivers Table of contents 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Objective of this report............................................................................................................3 1.2. Methodology ...........................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Opportunities of Tram-Based Systems Cyprien Richer, Sophie Hasiak
    Territorial opportunities of tram-based systems Cyprien Richer, Sophie Hasiak To cite this version: Cyprien Richer, Sophie Hasiak. Territorial opportunities of tram-based systems: Comparative analysis between Nottingham (UK) and Valenciennes (FRA). Town Planning Review, Liverpool University Press, 2014, 85 (2), pp.217-236. halshs-00993568 HAL Id: halshs-00993568 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00993568 Submitted on 6 Mar 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Town Planning Review Special Issue “Has rail saved the city? - Rail and Urban Development in Comparative Perspective“ Territorial opportunities of tram-based systems: Comparative analysis between Nottingham (UK) and Valenciennes (FRA) Cyprien Richer and Sophie Hasiak Cerema (Center for studies and expertise on Risks, Environment, Mobility, and Urban and Country Planning) Territorial Division for the Northern and Picardie Regions, 2 rue de Bruxelles CS 20275, 59019 Lille email: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Within the European project « Sintropher », this paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two tramway systems in Nottingham (UK) and Valenciennes (FRA). The aim is to understand how these tram-based systems were successfully integrated in the urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • La Mémoire Figée Des Objets Mobiles Arnaud Passalacqua
    La mémoire figée des objets mobiles Arnaud Passalacqua To cite this version: Arnaud Passalacqua. La mémoire figée des objets mobiles. Flonneau (M.) & Guigueno (V.) (dir.), De l’histoire des transports à l’histoire de la mobilité ?, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2009, Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2009, 2009. hal-02415368 HAL Id: hal-02415368 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02415368 Submitted on 17 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. La mémoire figée des objets mobiles Arnaud Passalacqua1 Qui se souvient que l’année 2006 vit la célébration de 100 ans d’autobus à Paris, événement organisé sur un mode mineur par une RATP plus encline à fêter le centenaire du métro en 2000 ? Comme si l’ouverture des tunnels de la ligne n° 1 de métro, que nous empruntons encore, était plus palpable que la motorisation d’un omnibus hippomobile, dont les autobus actuels ne sont que de très lointains héritiers. Au-delà du rapport de chaque mode aux infrastructures et donc de leur place dans l’espace public et l’imaginaire de Paris, ce qui se trouve en question est bien là le rapport patrimonial existant entre la ville et les objets qui lui assurent une certaine mobilité.
    [Show full text]
  • French Light Rail
    NEW FRENCH LIGHT RAIL SYSTEMS IN THE TWENTYFIRST CENTURY (Twentyone tramways, five tram-trains, five rubber-tyred tramways and one metro) -------------- by Graham Jellett Light Rail Transit Association Website: www.lrta.org Email: graham at jellett.plus.com Mobile: 07758087389 NEW TRAMWAYS, TRAM-TRAINS and METRO IN FRANCE from 2000 to 2017 Inner Urban Opening Inner Urban Opening Conurbation Population Year Conurbation Population Year STEEL WHEEL TRAMWAYS TRAM-TRAINS 1. Montpellier 264,538 2000 1. Paris T4 2,243,833 2006 2. Orléans 114,185 2000 2. Lyon 491,268 2010 3. Lyon 491,268 2000 3. Mulhouse 110,351 2010 4. Bordeaux 239,399 2003 4. Nantes 287,845 2011 5. Mulhouse 110,351 2006 5. Paris T11 2,243,833 2017 6. Valenciennes 43,471 2006 RUBBER-TYRED “TRAMWAYS” 7. Paris T3 2,243,833 2006 8. Marseille 850,636 2007 1. Nancy * 105,382 2001 9. Le Mans 143,240 2007 2. Caen * 108,793 2002 10. Nice 344,064 2007 3. Clermont- 140,597 2006 11. Toulouse 447,340 2010 Ferrand 12. Reims 180,752 2011 4. Paris T5 2,243,833 2013 13. Angers 148,803 2011 5. Paris T6 2,243,833 2014 14. Brest 140,547 2012 METRO 15. Dijon 151,504 2012 1. Rennes 208,033 2002 16. Le Havre 174,156 2012 (driverless) 17. Tours 134,633 2013 18. Paris T7 2,243,833 2013 Tramways, tram-trains and metros 19. Besançon 115,879 2014 are all electrically powered 20. Aubagne 45,800 2014 * Nancy and Caen trams also have 21.
    [Show full text]
  • RIHSAC Presentation January 2019
    1 ORR protects the interests of rail and road users, improving the safety, value and performance of railways and roads today and in the future Health and safety priorities 2019/20 and outcomes from the annual Risk Assessment and Risk Ranking (RARR) exercise Ian Prosser 2 Top priorities for 2019-20 – internal focus ■ Developing our staff and ensuring that we have a succession plan. We have a number of staff who are likely to leave us over the next year and currently 20 staff who are in training posts ( with 3 more to join) ■ Organisational effectiveness and capability – continuously improve core process of investigation and enforcement, QMS and data for planning ■ Embedding team approach to supervising heritage and tram sector ■ Introduction of new technology and trains – creating a new rolling stock post to aid this, improving understanding of automation and human factors ■ Supervision of Sandilands RAIB recommendations; moving from enablers to operational delivery ■ Brexit and bilateral engagement – legislative change to our criteria and procedures - developing new relationships 3 Top priorities for 2019-20 (following RARR and themes in 2017/18 annual health and safety report) ■ Poor performance creates pressure on the system – pressure on staff, priority of managing safety, degraded modes and recovery, PTI, station overcrowding ■ Network Rail: Operating Irregularities; Vegetation Management; SPAD Management; Trespass; Workforce safety. ■ Safe introduction into use of the Crossrail Central Operating Section (CCOS) ■ The challenges of CP6 – increased route devolution and route MD ownership and route / center accountabilities; focus on punctuality, performance and delivery of volumes on time and to cost – create the conditions where (unconscious) prioritisation of other factors can allow safety standards to slip… 4 RARR review 2018 .
    [Show full text]
  • A White Paper)
    Indian Railways Lifeline of the nation (A White Paper) February 2015 Government of India Ministry of Railways NEW DELHI Contents FOREWORD ________________________________________________________________ 1 1. Introduction______________________________________________________________ 3 4. Customer Engagement ____________________________________________________ 20 5. Rolling Stock ____________________________________________________________ 29 6. Financial Status _________________________________________________________ 32 7. Alternate Financing Options _______________________________________________ 41 8. Conclusion______________________________________________________________ 47 9. Annexes ________________________________________________________________ 48 10. Glossary of common terms in use in Railway Statistics __________________________ 58 Indian Railways Lifeline of the nation List of Tables Table 1: Share of Transport Sector in Overall GDP (%) .............................................................4 Table 2: Key Parameters .............................................................................................................4 Table 3: Financing the Railway Plan ..........................................................................................7 Table 4: Passenger Service Yields in some Major Economies ......................................................7 Table 5: Freight Yields in some Major Economies ......................................................................8 Table 6: Benchmarking Indian Railways
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Disabled Access to the Tram System in Melbourne, Victoria
    GFS-0812 Improving Disabled Access to the Tram System in Melbourne, Victoria An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Department of Infrastructure and the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by ____________________________________________ Alexander Christakis ____________________________________________ Katie Flynn ____________________________________________ Jennifer Himottu 28 April 2007 ____________________________________________ Professor Holly Ault, Advisor ____________________________________________ Professor Guillermo Salazar, Advisor This report represents the work of three WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. Abstract This project assisted the Department of Infrastructure of the Victorian government in improving the accessibility of the tram system for disabled passengers in Melbourne, Australia. A systematic rating system for assessing future stops to upgrade to conform to accessibility standards was proposed and applied to three target routes. Criteria were defined by reviewing the current state of accessibility and interviewing stakeholders. The proposed approach will help to effectively focus project effort and funding to critical areas in the future. ii Acknowledgements This project was a great undertaking and the first time WPI was able to work with the DOI of the state of Victoria. Therefore, we would like to thank the several people that helped and encouraged us throughout our project and made our stay in Melbourne even more enjoyable. We would first like to thank our project liaison Dr. Jim North, also known to us as ―Doctor‖, ―Professor‖, ―Gunslinger‖, ―The Scotsman‖ and ―Boss Jim.‖ He went above and beyond his duties as project liaison and drilled into our heads the idea of ―Scottish Rules.‖ All the information we needed, as long as we asked, we received.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions Techniques Pour Les Structures De Voie
    www.angst-pfister.com Du standard au sur-mesure Prestations du Groupe Angst + Pfister Solutions techniques Au fil des ans, Angst + Pfister a mis en place une équipe complète d’ingénieurs Angst + Pfister – Votre fournisseur et créateur de solutions spécialisés hautement qualifiés qui a acquis une expertise dans un large éventail pour les structures de voie d’industries. Sous la marque APSO (Angst + Pfister Solutions), nos spécialistes Le Groupe Angst + Pfister est un producteur et prestataire de services Angst + Pfister associe des concepts logistiques efficaces à des en ingénierie développent des solutions personnalisées pour quasiment toutes techniques international de premier plan pour les composants services d‘ingénierie des produits complets. Outre des pièces les applications imaginables dans nos cinq gammes de produits de base. industriels de pointe. En tant que fournisseur et créateur de solutions personnalisées, le Groupe propose une gamme de produits riche Nos ingénieurs ferroviaires spécialisés vous offrent des solutions sur mesure pour la technologie des matières plastiques, de l‘étanchéité, des d‘environ 100 000 éléments standards. dans les domaines technologiques suivants: fluides, étanchéité, matières fluides, de la transmission, de l‘antivibration et des capteurs, plastiques, transmission et antivibratoire. Nos principaux domaines d’activité Services d’ingénierie : l’expertise sur toute la ligne Expertise technique spécialisée aux quatre coins du monde qui profite à nos clients locaux: • Aide à la conception et au développement
    [Show full text]