DOCSLIB.ORG

A Yankee in King Gustav's Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Yankee in King Gustav's Court BOOKS et al. MEDICINE in Eastern religions. Such Waughian inter- jections made me wonder whether the rural A Yankee in King Gustav’s Court Pennsylvanian had wandered into his pres- ent position of chancellor of the University Sydney Brenner of California, San Francisco, by some com- hen I was elected a fellow of a ic accident. But once we get to the last chap- Cambridge College, it took me a ter, where Bishop gives us many insights in- Wshort time to realize that I might to the nature of the scientific enterprise and have also been endowed with a gift of knowl- where he reveals his leadership roles in the edge. Judging by my colleagues, I too should fields of university education and research, be able to discourse on an enormous range of we realize that he is a deeply knowledgeable arcane subjects—15th-century ecclesiastical Image not and serious man who has brought to his in- history, the politics of the Weimar Republic, tellectual work a responsible humanity. cobbled paving, Baroque art, modal logic, available for I urge every student to read How to Win black holes—easily dwarfing my modest online use. the Nobel Prize. They will learn that even knowledge of genetics and if one needs luck to succeed, one can de- How to Win molecular biology. And so velop a sensitivity to lucky situations and the Nobel Prize it is, we learn from this de- have both the courage and the humility to An Unexpected lightful book, with the give back to science and to other people the Life in Science Nobel Prize, although the fruits of achievement. author claims he was never by J. Michael Bishop asked to display this rich Epidemic by Alfred Kubin (1900–1901). SCIENCE POLICY Harvard University source of expertise. This is Press, Cambridge, not an innocent remark, as the news reaches California around 2 a.m. MA, 2003. 287 pp., Which Future the reader will soon learn There cannot be too many people who sit up illus. $27.95, £18.50, on September 4, 2007 that J. Michael Bishop is a all night waiting for such a call, and so it €27.95. ISBN 0- for Humanity? 674-00880-4. man of discerning erudi- generally comes as a surprise to those who tion lightly concealed be- can be found at all. The author’s account of Roger A. Pielke Jr. hind a thin veil of the sim- the phone call and the subsequent events cul- ple country boy who, through a series of ac- minating in the award week in Stockholm n the movie The Matrix, Morpheus offers cidents, made it in the select world of high has many comic moments, and his studied Neo a choice between a red pill and a blue scientific achievement. Notwithstanding its comparison of the Nobel Prize to what ap- Ipill: “You take the blue pill and the story title, the book does not instruct us on how to pears to be a minor achievement in a base- ends. You wake in your bed and you believe win the Prize, an ennobelment sought by ball game sets the tone of the book. Of whatever you want to believe. You take the many but achieved by few. If it is a recipe, it course, I know absolutely nothing about red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I www.sciencemag.org is only one in the sense that one way of doing baseball (having never distinguished be- show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” it is to live the life of Michael Bishop. tween Willie Mays and Willie Sutton) and I In Our Final Hour, Martin Rees elo- Bishop shared the 1989 Nobel Prize for may have misunderstood the significance of quently describes a real-world choice now Physiology or Medicine with his colleague, “hitting a baseball ‘from behind in the facing contemporary society: Do we follow Harold Varmus for their “discovery of the count,’” but the comparison is part of the science and technology where it takes us, cellular origin of retroviral oncogenes.” homespun American guise of the author. hope for the best, and deal with the conse- Their critical finding was that DNA se- Indeed, if we were to provide a Polonian quences? Or, instead, do we believe that the Downloaded from quences corresponding to SRC (“sark”), the classification of the book, it is decidedly risks to humanity presented by advances in gene in Rous sarcoma virus that is required comical-historical in both the autobiography science and technology require a funda- for the transformation of normal cells into and the historical accounts of microbiology mental rethinking of the governance of the tumor cells, were present in the genome of and cancer research. For those, like myself, research and development enterprise? normal chickens. Similar sequences are who read Paul de Kruif’s Microbe Hunters With horrifying descriptions of the found in mammalian genomes, and SRC (Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1926) many threats to humanity posed by 21st-century was the first of a long list of genes that have years ago and remember the protagonists as science and technology, the first half of the been shown to produce cancer after their great heroic figures, what Bishop reports book is all red pill. Rees’s survey of perils activity was modified by a mutation. about their lives comes as an interesting sur- includes the terror and error of nuclear Today we all accept that cancer is a ge- prise. John Hunter was said to have given bombs, bioweapons, and laboratory mis- netic disease, and the history of this re- himself venereal disease, and Ignaz takes; the relatively pedestrian—by con- search, in which Bishop played an important Semmelweis, who showed that puerperal trast—Earth-threatening asteroid and hu- role, is the book’s centerpiece. Bishop begins fever was caused by doctors failing to wash man (or nonhuman)-caused climate change; with the telephone call. The Prize is an- their hands, ended up in lunatic asylum nounced in Stockholm at about 11 a.m., thus where he was beaten to death by the atten- dants. The stern Robert Koch, at the age of The reviewer is at the Center for Science and 47, fell in love with 17-year-old Hedwig Technology Policy Research, University of The reviewer is at The Salk Instiute, 10100 North Colorado/CIRES, 1333 Grandview Avenue, Campus Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037–1099, USA. E- Freiberg. They married 3 years later, and she Box 488, Boulder, CO 80309–0488, USA. E-mail: CREDIT: KUNSTBAU, LENBACHHAUS MUNICH; RIGHTS SOCIETY,ARTISTS BILD-KUNST, © 2002 YORK/VG NEW BONN mail: [email protected] survived until 1945, developing an interest [email protected] www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 301 12 SEPTEMBER 2003 1483 B OOKS ET AL. and the fanciful, nanotechnology-spawned one’s perception of the importance “gray goo” and particle physics experiments of space colonization for preserv- with the potential to rip apart the space-time ing humanity. fabric of our universe. Each of these phe- Second, trying to “slow science nomena has the potential to threaten human down” may simply be folly. Invoking civilization on Earth. In Rees’s view, the risk Freeman Dyson, Rees implies that of such a catastrophic end is higher today the costs of “saying no” to science than ever before and is still growing. would greatly exceed the benefits of What could have been highly complex doing so, because we would have to and arcane descriptions of threats are ex- forgo many wonderful positive con- tremely accessible, to a large degree because tributions society receives from re- of Rees’s adept and frequent allusions to pop- Image not search. From this perspective, instead ular culture’s catastrophist movies and books. of taking action to slow down science The author’s success reminds us of the criti- available for and technology, we should instead cal lens that thoughtful fiction provides for online use. learn to deal better with their conse- comprehending novel policy issues related to quences. In several places, Rees sug- science and technology. gests that the favored course of many After reviewing the various perils fac- basic researchers (perhaps including ing humanity, Rees observes that “the himself), would not be to “say no” to surest safeguard against a new danger science but to depend on a “special would be to deny the world the basic sci- responsibility” of scientists. This is ence that underpins it.” Placing the respon- perhaps one reason why he earlier ar- sibility for making such decisions on gued for the opposite position: deci- groups “far beyond the scientific commu- sions about the governance of science nity,” he asks whether such dangers might and technology should not be left be “reduced by putting the brakes on po- solely in the hands of a research com- tentially threatening science and technolo- munity hungry for resources and fo- gy and even renouncing some areas of sci- Escaped so far. cused on advancing knowledge. entific research completely?” increase the chances of avoiding global ca- Last, the book is centered not on alter- Rees does not seem entirely comfortable tastrophe? If we wanted to slow science and native responses to the potential for global on September 4, 2007 with a direct answer to this question. Before technology down how would we do it? Who catastrophe but on developing a justifica- reaching the Epilogue, he seems to have for- would decide? How might governance of tion for space colonization. In an earlier gotten his earlier call for the public to re- the science and technology enterprise book, Rees wrote that reducing the vulner- strain science, and he instead evolve in ways that favor de- ability of humans to catastrophe provides places responsibility with the Our Final Hour sired outcomes and reduce “the strongest motive for pursuing a pro- scientific community alone: A Scientist’s Warning; the prospects of catastrophe? gram of manned space flight” (1), and Our “Experimenters should be cau- How Terror, Error, and Serious discussion about Final Hour develops this theme.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Technology Agency ANTEPRIMA.Pdf
    revision copy revision copy Associazione Culturale Diàlexis is a Think Tank founded in 2006 at the occasion of the celebration of the 50 years of the Rome Treaty. It published, at that occasion, with the publishing house Alpina, the Book ―50 Years of Europe, Images and Reflections‖, and organised in the Palace of the Piedmont Region the exhibition ―Immagini e riflessioni per i 50 anni d‘Europa‖. It has the aim of diffusing in Piedmont the knowledge of Europe and in Europe the knowledge of the Piedmont. Baustellen Europas is a bookseries devoted to Europa as cultural construction, previously published by Alpina, and now by Associazione Culturale Diàlexis Riccardo Lala, chairman of the Associazione, has participated to the making of Europe in the most diverse capacities: youth movements, trade associations, national and European civil and military public service, trade unionism, management of financial and industrial European multinationals in the areas of fashion, chemistry, energy, high tech, transportation, defense, services and publishing. He negotiated and drafted the founding documents of ELV, the company manufacturing the Vega Launcher of Arianespace, the 1st stage of Ariane as well the AVUM body of the European reusable space vehicle. revision copy revision copy Copyright 2020 By Riccardo Lala All rights of paper and digital reproduction or adaptation, partial or total, by whichever means (including microfilms and photocopies) are reserved for all countries. The publisher may grant, under payment, the authorization to reproduce a
    [Show full text]
  • Eschatology and the Technological Future
    Eschatology and the Technological Future This book offers an insightful and timely analysis of key theorists and ideas in the intersection between theology and technology. From the religiously inspired technological optimism of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Nikolai Fedorov, to the darker technological pessimism of Jacques Ellul, the contributions of Christian theorists to under- standing the technological milieu can offer us fresh perspectives on some intractable problems of modern life. As Burdett clearly shows, technological optimism and utopianism have religious roots, and a technological culture that ignores its own roots is in danger not only of environmental devastation, but also existential and spiritual despair. A fi ne book at a critical time. — David Lewin, Liverpool Hope University, UK The rapid advancement of technology has led to an explosion of speculative theories about what the future of humankind may look like. These “tech- nological futurisms” from the fi elds of nanotechnology, biotechnology and information technology are drawing growing scrutiny from the philosophi- cal and theological communities. This text seeks to contextualize the grow- ing literature on the cultural, philosophical and religious implications of technological advancement by considering technological futurisms such as transhumanism in the context of the long historical tradition of technologi- cal dreaming. Michael Burdett traces the latent religious sources of our con- temporary technological imagination by looking at visionary approaches to technology and the future in seminal technological utopias and sci- ence fi ction and draws on past theological responses to the technological future with Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Jacques Ellul. Burdett’s argu- ment arrives at a contemporary Christian response to transhumanism based around the themes of possibility and promise by turning to the works of Richard Kearney, Eberhard Jüngel and Jürgen Moltmann.
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumanism
    T ranshumanism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T ranshum... Transhumanism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia See also: Outline of transhumanism Transhumanism is an international Part of Ideology series on intellectual and cultural movement supporting Transhumanism the use of science and technology to improve human mental and physical characteristics Ideologies and capacities. The movement regards aspects Abolitionism of the human condition, such as disability, Democratic transhumanism suffering, disease, aging, and involuntary Extropianism death as unnecessary and undesirable. Immortalism Transhumanists look to biotechnologies and Libertarian transhumanism other emerging technologies for these Postgenderism purposes. Dangers, as well as benefits, are Singularitarianism also of concern to the transhumanist Technogaianism [1] movement. Related articles The term "transhumanism" is symbolized by Transhumanism in fiction H+ or h+ and is often used as a synonym for Transhumanist art "human enhancement".[2] Although the first known use of the term dates from 1957, the Organizations contemporary meaning is a product of the 1980s when futurists in the United States Applied Foresight Network Alcor Life Extension Foundation began to organize what has since grown into American Cryonics Society the transhumanist movement. Transhumanist Cryonics Institute thinkers predict that human beings may Foresight Institute eventually be able to transform themselves Humanity+ into beings with such greatly expanded Immortality Institute abilities as to merit the label "posthuman".[1] Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Transhumanism is therefore sometimes Transhumanism Portal · referred to as "posthumanism" or a form of transformational activism influenced by posthumanist ideals.[3] The transhumanist vision of a transformed future humanity has attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Extinction Risks in the Cosmological and Astrobiological Contexts
    HUMAN EXTINCTION RISKS IN THE COSMOLOGICAL AND ASTROBIOLOGICAL CONTEXTS Milan M. Ćirković Astronomical Observatory Belgrade Volgina 7, 11160 Belgrade Serbia and Montenegro e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We review the subject of human extinction (in its modern form), with particular emphasis on the natural sub-category of existential risks. Enormous breakthroughs made in recent decades in understanding of our terrestrial and cosmic environments shed new light on this old issue. In addition, our improved understanding of extinction of other species, and the successes of the nascent discipline of astrobiology create a mandate to elucidate the necessary conditions for survival of complex living and/or intelligent systems. A range of topics impacted by this “astrobiological revolution” encompasses such diverse fields as anthropic reasoning, complexity theory, philosophy of mind, or search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). Therefore, we shall attempt to put the issue of human extinction into a wider context of a general astrobiological picture of patterns of life/complex biospheres/intelligence in the Galaxy. For instance, it seems possible to define a secularly evolving risk function facing any complex metazoan lifeforms throughout the Galaxy. This multidisciplinary approach offers a credible hope that in the very close future of humanity all natural hazards will be well-understood and effective policies of reducing or eliminating them conceived and successfully implemented. This will, in turn, open way for a new issues dealing with the interaction of sentient beings with its astrophysical environment on truly cosmological scales, issues presciently speculated upon by great thinkers such as H. G. Wells, J. B.
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumanism, Progress and the Future
    A peer-reviewed electronic journal published by the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies ISSN 1541-0099 20(2) – December 2009 Transhumanism, Progress and the Future Philippe Verdoux [email protected] Journal of Evolution and Technology - Vol. 20 Issue 2 –December 2009 - pgs 49-69 http://jetpress.org/v20/verdoux.htm Abstract This paper argues that one can advocate a moral imperative to pursue enhancement technologies while at the same time rejecting the historical reality of progress and holding a pessimistic view of the future. The first half of the paper puts forth several arguments for why progress is illusory and why one has good reason to be pessimistic about the future of humanity (and posthumanity). The second half then argues that this is entirely consistent with also championing the futurological vision of transhumanism. The claim is that, relative to the alternatives proposed, this vision actually offers the safest route into the future, even if it also entails an increase in the probability of self-annihilation. 1. Transhumanism and progress Transhumanism is a recent philosophical and cultural movement that has both descriptive and normative components: (1) the descriptive claim is that current and anticipated future technologies will make it possible to radically alter both our world and persons, not just by “enhancing” the capacities that we already have but also by adding entirely new capacities not previously had.1 (2) The normative claim is that we ought to do what we can to foment and accelerate the creation of such “enhancement” technologies, thereby converting the possibility of a “posthuman” future into an actuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Catastrophe: Risk and Response; Collapse
    Book Reviews John D. Donahue Editor Note to Book Publishers: Please send all books for review directly to the incoming Book Review Editor, Eugene B. McGregor, Jr., Indiana University, School of Public & Environmental Affairs, 1315 E. 10th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405-1701. Katherine Kaufer Christoffel Private Guns, Public Health, by David Hemenway, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004, 344 pp., $27.95 cloth. “The public health approach is ideally suited to deal with our gun problem. Public health emphasizes prevention rather than fault-finding, blame, or revenge. It uses sci- ence rather than belief as its basis and relies on accurate data collection and scientific analysis. It promotes a wide variety of interventions—environmental as well as individ- ual—and integrates the activities of a wide variety of disciplines and institutions. Most important, public health brings a pragmatic attitude to problems—finding innovative solutions . .” (p. 25) Based on that laudable view, David Hemenway wrote Private Guns, Public Health to provide an authoritative overview of public health thinking about gun injuries and deaths in the United States. The perspectives and data summarized were developed over several 20th-century decades, and refined over the last 15 years, that is, in the wake of the tsunami of urban youth gun homicides in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The material is well-known to those who were involved in gun injury pre- vention research and advocacy during this time. It is not as well-known to the gen- eral public, policymakers, or young public health professionals. This book is an excellent summary for all of us and a good introduction to the field for newcomers.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Assessing the Drivers of Global Catastrophic Risk: a Review and Proposal for the Global Challenges Foundation
    Identifying and Assessing the Drivers of Global Catastrophic Risk: A Review and Proposal for the Global Challenges Foundation Simon Beard and Phil Torres Summary The goal of this report is to review and assess methods and approaches for assessing the drivers of global catastrophic risk. The review contains five sections: (1) A conceptual overview setting out our understanding of the concept of global catastrophic risks ​ (GCRs), their drivers, and how they can be assessed. (3) A brief historical overview of the field of GCR research, indicating how our understanding of the drivers of GCRs has developed. (2) A summary of existing studies that seek to quantify the drivers of GCR by assessing the likelihood that different causes will precipitate a global catastrophe. (4) A critical evaluation of the usefulness of this research given the conceptual framework outlined in section 1 and a review of emerging conceptual, evaluative and risk assessment tools that may allow for better assessments of the drivers of GCRs in the future. (5) A proposal for how the Global Challenges Foundation could work to most productively improve our understanding of the drivers of GCRs given the findings of sections 2, 3, and 4. Further information on these topics will be included in three appendices, each of which is an as-yet-unpublished academic paper by the authors, alone or in collaboration with others. These are: (A) Transhumanism, Effective Altruism, and Systems Theory: A History and Analysis of Existential Risk Studies. (B) An Analysis and Evaluation of Methods Currently Used to Quantify the Likelihood of Existential Hazards. (C) Assessing Climate Change’s Contribution to Global Catastrophic Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature on GCR
    Literature on GCR GCR general *Bostrom, N. & Cirkovi´c,´ M.M. 2008, “Introduction”, in: N. Bostrom and M. Cirkovic (eds.) Global Catastrophic Risks, OUP: Oxford. *Bostrom, N. 2007, “Technological Revolutions: Ethics and Policy in the Dark”, in: B. Gordijn & R. Chadwick (eds.), Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, Springer: New York. Bostrom, N. 2006, “Dinosaurs, dodos, humans?” in: Global Agenda, 230–231. *Bostrom, N. 2002, “Existential Risks: Analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards”, in: Journal of Evolution and Technology 9. Grossi, P. & Kunreuther, H. 2006, “Models for hard times”, in: Contingencies March/April 2006, 33–36. *Haimes, Y.Y. 2008, “Systems-based risk analysis”, in: N. Bostrom and M. Cirkovi´c´ (eds.) Global Catastrophic Risks, OUP, Oxford. *Hanson, R. 2008, “Catastrophe, social collapse, and and human extinction”, in: N. Bostrom and M. Cirkovi´c(eds.)´ Global Catastrophic Risks, OUP, Oxford. Hanson, R. 2007, Catastrophe, Social Collapse, and Human Extinction Hawking, S., Life in the universe Hempsell, C.M. 2004, “The Investigation of Natural Global Catastrophes”, in: JBIS 57, 2–13. Hempsell, C.M. 2004, “The Potential for Space Intervention in Global Catastro- phes”, in: JBIS 57, 14–21. Horton, R. 2005, “Threats to human survival: a WIRE to warn the world”, in: www.thelancet.com 365. Joy, B. 2000, “Why the future doesn’t need us”, in: Wired Magazine 8.04. 1 Kent, A. 2003, A critical look at risk assessments for global catastrophes, in: Risk Analysis 24(1), 157–168. *Leslie, J. 1996, The End of the World. The Science and Ethics of Human Extinc- tion, Routledge: New York. *Matheny, J.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Eschatology∗
    SLAC-PUB-11063 17 March 2005 SCIENTIFIC ESCHATOLOGY∗ H. Pierre Noyes and James V. Lindesayy Stanford Linear Accelerator Center MS 81, Stanford University, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park CA 94025, [email protected] Abstract The future evolution of the universe suggested by the cosmological model proposed earlier at this meeting by the authors is explored. The fundamental role played by the positive \cosmological constant" is emphasized. Dyson's 1979 paper entitled Time Without End is briefly reviewed. His most optimistic scenario requires that the uni- verse be geometrically open and that biology is structural in the sense that the current complexity of human society can be reproduced by scaling up its (quantum mechan- ical) structure to arbitrary size. If the recently measured \cosmological constant" is indeed a fundamental constant of nature, then Dyson's scenario is, for various rea- sons, ruled out by the finite (De Sitter) horizon due to exponential expansion of the resulting space. However, the finite temperature of that horizon does open other interesting options. If, as is suggested by the cosmology under consideration, the current exponential expansion of the universe is due to a phase transition which fixes a physical boundary condition during the early radiation dominated era, the behavior of the universe after the relevant scale factor crosses the De Sitter radius opens up still other possibilities. The relevance of Martin Rees' apocalyptic eschatology recently presented in his book Our Final Hour is mentioned. It is concluded that even for ∗Work supported in part by Department of Energy contract DE{AC02{76SF00515. yPermanent address: Department of Physics and Computational Physics Lab, Howard University, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources on Existential Risk
    Resources on Existential Risk For: Catastrophic Risk: Technologies and Policies Berkman Center for Internet and Society Harvard University Bruce Schneier, Instructor Fall 2015 Contents General Scholarly Discussion of Existential Risk ....................................................................................... 1 Nick Bostrom (Mar 2002), "Existential risks: Analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards." ................................................................................................................................... 1 Jason Matheney (Oct 2007), "Reducing the risk of human extinction." ............................................... 2 Nick Bostrom and Milan Ćirković (2008), "Introduction." .................................................................... 3 Anders Sandberg and Nick Bostrom (5 Dec 2008), “Global catastrophic risks survey.” ....................... 5 Nick Bostrom (2009), "The future of humanity." .................................................................................. 6 Nick Bostrom (Feb 2013), "Existential risk prevention as global priority." ........................................... 7 Kira Matus (25 Nov 2014), "Existential risk: challenges for risk regulation." ....................................... 7 Seth Baum (Dec 2014), "The great downside dilemma for risky emerging technologies." ................ 10 Dennis Pamlin and Stuart Armstrong (19 Feb 2015), "Twelve risks that threaten human civilisation: The case for a new risk category." ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilities, Methodologies and the Evidence Base in Existential Risk Assessments
    Thomas Rowe and Simon Beard Probabilities, methodologies and the evidence base in existential risk assessments Working paper Original citation: Rowe, Thomas and Beard, Simon (2018) Probabilities, methodologies and the evidence base in existential risk assessments. Working paper, Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, Cambridge, UK. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/89506/ Available in LSE Research Online: July 2018 © 2018 the Authors LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. Probabilities, Methodologies and the Evidence Base in Existential Risk Assessments CSER Working Paper 1 2 Thomas Rowe and Simon Beard This paper examines and evaluates a range of methodologies that have been proposed for making useful claims about the probability of phenomena that would contribute to existential risk. Section One provides a brief discussion of the nature of such claims, the contexts in which they tend to be made and the kinds of probability that they can contain. Section Two provides an overview of the methodologies that have been developed to arrive at these probabilities and assesses their advantages and disadvantages.
    [Show full text]
  • John Tierney Can Humanity Survive
    John Tierney: Can Humanity Survive? Want to Bet on It? - Ne... http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/science/30tier.html?sq=&s... January 30, 2007 FINDINGS Can Humanity Survive? Want to Bet on It? By JOHN TIERNEY Sixty years ago, a group of physicists concerned about nuclear weapons created the Doomsday Clock and set its hands at seven minutes to midnight. Now, the clock’s keepers, alarmed by new dangers like climate change, have moved the hands up to 11:55 p.m. My first reaction was a sigh of relief. After all, the 1947 doomsday prediction marked the start of a golden age. Never have so many humans lived so long — and maybe never so peacefully — as during the past 60 years. The per-capita rate of violence, particularly in the West, seems remarkably low by historical standards. If the clock’s keepers are worried once again, their track record suggests we’re in for even happier days. But there’s one novel twist that gives me pause. When the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists announced two weeks ago in Washington that it was adjusting the clock, it was joined in a trans-Atlantic press conference by scientists at the Royal Society in London. One of them was the society’s president, Martin Rees, a new breed of doomsayer. Dr. Rees, a cosmologist at Cambridge and Britain’s astronomer royal, doesn’t just issue gloomy predictions. He doesn’t just move the hands of an imaginary and inscrutable clock. (Its keepers have never explained what one of their minutes equals on anyone else’s clock or calendar.) No, Dr.
    [Show full text]