Leveraging the Singularity: Introducing AI to Liberal Arts Students

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leveraging the Singularity: Introducing AI to Liberal Arts Students Proceedings of the 2008 AAAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Education Leveraging the Singularity: Introducing AI to Liberal Arts Students James B. Marshall Department of Computer Science Sarah Lawrence College One Mead Way Bronxville, NY 10708 [email protected] Abstract signed. Most of the successful real-world AI systems de- In recent years, the notion that computers and robots will at- veloped to date operate only within narrowly defined tain superhuman levels of intelligence in the next few dec- boundaries. Master chess programs typically can’t play ades, ushering in a new “posthuman” era in evolutionary checkers or poker, even poorly; a robot that can navigate history, has gained widespread attention among technology mazes or drive itself across town probably isn’t very good enthusiasts, thanks in part to books such as Ray Kurzweil’s at diagnosing diseases or composing music, even at a very The Singularity Is Near. This paper describes an introduc- tory-level AI course designed to examine this idea in an ob- basic level. Efforts to develop natural language under- jective way by exploring the field of AI as it currently is, in standing systems and automated translators, an area of in- addition to what it might become in the future. An impor- tense research for the past several decades, have yielded tant goal of the course is to place these ideas within the only a modest amount of progress. Developing truly flexi- broader context of human and cosmic evolution. The course ble and robust systems with a broad spectrum of intelli- is aimed at undergraduate liberal arts students with no prior gence and common sense, what some researchers have background in science or engineering. begun calling Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), re- mains a distant and formidable goal. Introduction Nevertheless, despite the many challenges still fac- ing AI, there has been a remarkable increase over the past The field of Artificial Intelligence is now over a half- few years in the level of speculation and excitement about century old, having established itself as a viable intellec- the prospects of achieving human-level intelligence in tual discipline in the early 1950s, with the advent of the computers and robots within the next few decades. A new first programmable electronic computers. Since then, the vision of humanity’s future has taken hold among many dream of creating intelligent machines has lost none of its technology enthusiasts, and has been gradually making its original excitement and fascination, and impressive ad- way into the wider public consciousness. According to this vances have been made in almost every area of the field. vision, the continuing acceleration of computer power and Today, machines can recognize faces, process speech, other information-based technologies, combined with ad- learn from experience, drive themselves autonomously for vances in molecular biology, genetic engineering, and the hundreds of miles, explore the surfaces of distant planets, nascent field of nanotechnology, will soon lead to the de- beat human chess masters with ease, diagnose some dis- velopment of machines that will match, and then quickly eases better than human experts, compose music, handle surpass, the intellectual powers of humans. Once machines customer service calls interactively over the phone, and attain this level of sophistication, they will be able to ana- even improve their performance through simulated evolu- lyze, understand, and enhance their own designs, setting in tion, to mention just a few of the many accomplishments motion an ever-accelerating cycle of recursive self- that AI researchers have achieved over the years. improvement. This will utterly transform our civilization, Yet for all of its successes, AI still has far to go. in ways that are almost impossible to foresee, and will Progress in many areas has been painstakingly slow, and mark the beginning of a new “posthuman” era in evolu- we still lack robust general-purpose systems that exhibit tionary history. This scenario is often referred to as the intelligence across a wide range of different problem do- Singularity, by way of analogy with physics. Just as a mains, beyond those for which they were specifically de- physical singularity such as a black hole has an event hori- zon beyond which no information about it can be known, Copyright © 2008, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelli- the technological Singularity represents a discontinuity in gence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. the flow of human history, beyond whose “event horizon” 62 nothing can be known or predicted. sailing ships plied the seas. Within a few more centuries, The term “Singularity” seems to have first been the printing press and the steam engine and the harnessing suggested by the mathematician and science fiction author of electricity had transformed human society as thoroughly Vernor Vinge in the 1980s, but these ideas can be traced as the invention of farming and the plough had several back much further. In 1965, for example, the statistician millennia earlier. And the past one hundred years have I. J. Good wrote of a coming “intelligence explosion”: witnessed the most radical technological advances of all. Think of the world of 1908, as compared to the world of Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a ma- 2008. Back then, automobiles, telephones, phonographs, chine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities and flying machines were curiosities only recently in- of any man however clever. Since the design of ma- vented. Television, digital computers, hydrogen bombs, chines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultrain- space travel, mobile phones, and the Internet were as yet telligent machine could design even better machines; unimaginable, though they lay only a few decades away in there would then unquestionably be an “intelligence explosion”, and the intelligence of man would be left the future. far behind. Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is What of the next one hundred years? Viewed from the last invention that man need ever make. a larger historical perspective, it is hard to imagine that the technological advances of the coming decades will be any More recently, the well-known AI pioneer and tech- less profound or far-ranging than those of the past century. nologist Ray Kurzweil, and the robotics pioneer Hans In all likelihood their impact will be far greater. Barring Moravec of CMU, have introduced these ideas to a much some unprecedented catastrophe, the arc of the trajectory wider audience through several popular science books seems clear: ever upward, at an ever faster pace. Our most (Moravec, 1988, 1999; Kurzweil 1999, 2005). In particu- advanced current technologies will seem far cruder and lar, Kurzweil’s book The Singularity Is Near has inspired more antiquated a hundred years from now than the slide much discussion and controversy within academic circles rules, flying machines, and Model T’s of 1908 seem to us since its publication in 2005 (Singularity Summit 2006, today. Think of the implications. 2007), and there is even a movie version of the book in the But does this mean that we will have succeeded by works, slated for release later this year. Kurzweil confi- then in creating conscious robots with superhuman intelli- dently and enthusiastically predicts that by 2029 computers gence, poised to supersede or even supplant us in the re- will have fully passed the Turing Test, as a result of pro- lentless ongoing march of evolutionary development? gress in reverse engineering the human brain made possi- Could we homo sapiens really be on the verge of creating ble by the continued development of faster computational our own successors? The prospect of an imminent transi- hardware according to Moore’s Law. Moravec predicts tion from carbon-based human intelligence to silicon-based that cheap computer hardware will match the computa- machine intelligence does in fact have its precedents in the tional capacity of the brain by 2020. Others, however, history of life on Earth: the origin of life itself was a including the respected computer scientist Bill Joy, are “phase transition” from inanimate to animate matter, which profoundly worried about the dangers posed to humanity took place billions of years ago on the early Earth; much by the development of intelligent robots and other power- later, life changed substrate again with the colonization of ful technologies. They argue that we should impose strict the land by early amphibians. Such things are possible. Or limits on current research in AI, genetics, and nanotech- is it more likely, as Joy fears, that the development of ever nology, or even abandon work in some areas entirely, be- more powerful technologies will, one way or another, un- fore it is too late (Joy, 2000). leash a catastrophe on a vast scale that destroys our techno- What can one make of all this? On the one hand, it logical society, or even renders humanity extinct? Perhaps is tempting to dismiss these ideas as simply the fanciful all emerging intelligent civilizations in the Universe (if speculations of technology buffs prone to overindulging in indeed any others exist) go through a similar dangerous science fiction. On the other hand, if one examines the period of technological adolescence, a kind of evolutionary arguments more carefully and objectively, they become “test” to determine if they are mature enough and wise harder to dismiss outright, especially if one takes a longer- enough to manage their newfound powers, and thus worthy range view of the evolution of life on Earth. There can be enough to survive and flourish. Perhaps we are entering no doubt that something profound has been happening on our own time of testing. our planet over the past few millennia. Around ten thou- sand years ago, the technology of agriculture first appeared on the Earth, invented by itinerant tribes of humans who An Idea for a Course were already quite adept at making tools for hunting and Regardless of how much credence one gives to the argu- gathering their food.
Recommended publications
  • Technology & Computer Science
    The Latticework: Technology & Computer Science The Latticework: Technology & Computer Science 1 The Latticework: Technology & Computer Science What I noted since the really big ideas carry 95% of the freight, it wasn’t at all hard for me to pick up all the big ideas from all the big disciplines and make them a standard part of my mental routines. Once you have the ideas, of course, they are no good if you don’t practice – if you don’t practice you lose it. So, I went through life constantly practicing this model of the multidisciplinary approach. Well, I can’t tell you what that’s done for me. It’s made life more fun, it’s made me more constructive, it’s made me more helpful to others, it’s made me enormously rich, you name it, that attitude really helps… …It doesn’t help you just to know them enough just so you can give them back on an exam and get an A. You have to learn these things in such a way that they’re in a mental latticework in your head and you automatically use them for the rest of your life. – Charlie Munger, 2007 USC Gould School of Law Commencement Speech 2 The Latticework: Technology & Computer Science Technology & Computer Science Technology has been the overriding tidal wave in the last several centuries (maybe millennia, if tools like plows and horse bridles are considered) and understanding the fundamentals in this field can be helpful in seeing the patterns behind these innovations, how they were arrived at, and their potential impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior Trees in Robotics and AI
    Michele Colledanchise and Petter Ogren¨ Behavior Trees in Robotics and AI An Introduction arXiv:1709.00084v4 [cs.RO] 3 Jun 2020 Contents 1 What are Behavior Trees? ....................................... 3 1.1 A Short History and Motivation of BTs . .4 1.2 What is wrong with FSMs? The Need for Reactiveness and Modularity . .5 1.3 Classical Formulation of BTs. .6 1.3.1 Execution Example of a BT . .9 1.3.2 Control Flow Nodes with Memory . 11 1.4 Creating a BT for Pac-Man from Scratch . 12 1.5 Creating a BT for a Mobile Manipulator Robot . 14 1.6 Use of BTs in Robotics and AI . 15 1.6.1 BTs in autonomous vehicles . 16 1.6.2 BTs in industrial robotics . 18 1.6.3 BTs in the Amazon Picking Challenge . 20 1.6.4 BTs inside the social robot JIBO . 21 2 How Behavior Trees Generalize and Relate to Earlier Ideas . 23 2.1 Finite State Machines . 23 2.1.1 Advantages and disadvantages . 24 2.2 Hierarchical Finite State Machines . 24 2.2.1 Advantages and disadvantages . 24 2.2.2 Creating a FSM that works like a BTs . 29 2.2.3 Creating a BT that works like a FSM . 32 2.3 Subsumption Architecture . 32 2.3.1 Advantages and disadvantages . 33 2.3.2 How BTs Generalize the Subsumption Architecture . 33 2.4 Teleo-Reactive programs . 33 2.4.1 Advantages and disadvantages . 34 2.4.2 How BTs Generalize Teleo-Reactive Programs . 35 2.5 Decision Trees . 35 2.5.1 Advantages and disadvantages .
    [Show full text]
  • History of Robotics: Timeline
    History of Robotics: Timeline This history of robotics is intertwined with the histories of technology, science and the basic principle of progress. Technology used in computing, electricity, even pneumatics and hydraulics can all be considered a part of the history of robotics. The timeline presented is therefore far from complete. Robotics currently represents one of mankind’s greatest accomplishments and is the single greatest attempt of mankind to produce an artificial, sentient being. It is only in recent years that manufacturers are making robotics increasingly available and attainable to the general public. The focus of this timeline is to provide the reader with a general overview of robotics (with a focus more on mobile robots) and to give an appreciation for the inventors and innovators in this field who have helped robotics to become what it is today. RobotShop Distribution Inc., 2008 www.robotshop.ca www.robotshop.us Greek Times Some historians affirm that Talos, a giant creature written about in ancient greek literature, was a creature (either a man or a bull) made of bronze, given by Zeus to Europa. [6] According to one version of the myths he was created in Sardinia by Hephaestus on Zeus' command, who gave him to the Cretan king Minos. In another version Talos came to Crete with Zeus to watch over his love Europa, and Minos received him as a gift from her. There are suppositions that his name Talos in the old Cretan language meant the "Sun" and that Zeus was known in Crete by the similar name of Zeus Tallaios.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading List
    EECS 101 Introduction to Computer Science Dinda, Spring, 2009 An Introduction to Computer Science For Everyone Reading List Note: You do not need to read or buy all of these. The syllabus and/or class web page describes the required readings and what books to buy. For readings that are not in the required books, I will either provide pointers to web documents or hand out copies in class. Books David Harel, Computers Ltd: What They Really Can’t Do, Oxford University Press, 2003. Fred Brooks, The Mythical Man-month: Essays on Software Engineering, 20th Anniversary Edition, Addison-Wesley, 1995. Joel Spolsky, Joel on Software: And on Diverse and Occasionally Related Matters That Will Prove of Interest to Software Developers, Designers, and Managers, and to Those Who, Whether by Good Fortune or Ill Luck, Work with Them in Some Capacity, APress, 2004. Most content is available for free from Spolsky’s Blog (see http://www.joelonsoftware.com) Paul Graham, Hackers and Painters, O’Reilly, 2004. See also Graham’s site: http://www.paulgraham.com/ Martin Davis, The Universal Computer: The Road from Leibniz to Turing, W.W. Norton and Company, 2000. Ted Nelson, Computer Lib/Dream Machines, 1974. This book is now very rare and very expensive, which is sad given how visionary it was. Simon Singh, The Code Book: The Science of Secrecy from Ancient Egypt to Quantum Cryptography, Anchor, 2000. Douglas Hofstadter, Goedel, Escher, Bach: The Eternal Golden Braid, 20th Anniversary Edition, Basic Books, 1999. Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Le Ton Beau De Marot
    Journal of Translation, Volume 4, Number 1 (2008) 7 Book Review Le Ton Beau de Marot: In Praise of the Music of Language. By Douglas R. Hofstadter New York: Basic Books, 1997. Pp. 632. Paper $29.95. ISBN 0465086454. Reviewed by Milton Watt SIM International Introduction Busy translators may not have much time to read in the area of literary translation, but there are some valuable books in that field that can help us in the task of Bible translation. One such book is Le Ton Beau de Marot by Douglas Hofstadter. This book will allow you to look at translation from a fresh perspective by way of various models, using terms or categories you may not have thought of, or realized. Some specific translation techniques will challenge you to think through how you translate, such as intentionally creating a non-natural sounding text at times to give it the flavor of the original text. This book is particularly pertinent for those who are translating poetry and wrestling with the occasional tension between form and meaning. The author of Le Ton Beau de Marot, Douglas Hofstadter, is most known for his 1979 Pulitzer prize- winning book Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (1979) that propelled him to legendary status in the mathematical/computer intellectual community. Hofstadter is a professor of Cognitive Science and Computer Science at Indiana University in Bloomington and is the director of the Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition, where he studies the mechanisms of analogy and creativity. Hofstadter was drawn to write Le Ton Beau de Marot because of his knowledge of many languages, his fascination with the complexities of translation, and his experiences of having had his book Gödel, Escher, Bach translated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reading List for Undergraduate Mathematics Majors: a Personal View Paul Froeschl University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
    Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal Issue 8 Article 12 7-1-1993 A Reading List for Undergraduate Mathematics Majors: A Personal View Paul Froeschl University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmnj Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Froeschl, Paul (1993) "A Reading List for Undergraduate Mathematics Majors: A Personal View," Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal: Iss. 8, Article 12. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmnj/vol1/iss8/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Reading List for Undergraduate Mathematics Majors A Personal View PaulFroeschJ University ofMinnesota Minneapolis, MN This has been a reflective year. Early in 4. Science and Hypothesis, Henri Poincare. September I realized that Jwas starting my twenty- fifth year of college teaching. Those days and 5. A Mathematician 's Apol0D'.GR. Hardy. years of teaching were ever present in my mind One day in class I mentioned a book (I forget 6. HistOO' of Mathematics. Carl Boyer. which one now) that I thought my students There are perhaps more thorough histories, (mathematics majors) should read before but for ease of reference and early graduating. One of them asked for a list of such accessibility for nascent mathematics books-awonderfully reflective idea! majors this histoty is best, One list was impossible, but three lists 7. HistorY of Calculus, Carl Boyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Without Representation: a Historical Perspective
    systems Commentary Intelligence without Representation: A Historical Perspective Anna Jordanous School of Computing, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4AG, UK; [email protected] Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2020; Published: 15 September 2020 Abstract: This paper reflects on a seminal work in the history of AI and representation: Rodney Brooks’ 1991 paper Intelligence without representation. Brooks advocated the removal of explicit representations and engineered environments from the domain of his robotic intelligence experimentation, in favour of an evolutionary-inspired approach using layers of reactive behaviour that operated independently of each other. Brooks criticised the current progress in AI research and believed that removing complex representation from AI would help address problematic areas in modelling the mind. His belief was that we should develop artificial intelligence by being guided by the evolutionary development of our own intelligence and that his approach mirrored how our own intelligence functions. Thus, the field of behaviour-based robotics emerged. This paper offers a historical analysis of Brooks’ behaviour-based robotics approach and its impact on artificial intelligence and cognitive theory at the time, as well as on modern-day approaches to AI. Keywords: behaviour-based robotics; representation; adaptive behaviour; evolutionary robotics 1. Introduction In 1991, Rodney Brooks published the paper Intelligence without representation, a seminal work on behaviour-based robotics [1]. This paper influenced many aspects of research into artificial intelligence and cognitive theory. In Intelligence without representation, Brooks described his behaviour-based robotics approach to artificial intelligence. He highlighted a number of points that he considers fundamental in modelling intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • European Technology Agency ANTEPRIMA.Pdf
    revision copy revision copy Associazione Culturale Diàlexis is a Think Tank founded in 2006 at the occasion of the celebration of the 50 years of the Rome Treaty. It published, at that occasion, with the publishing house Alpina, the Book ―50 Years of Europe, Images and Reflections‖, and organised in the Palace of the Piedmont Region the exhibition ―Immagini e riflessioni per i 50 anni d‘Europa‖. It has the aim of diffusing in Piedmont the knowledge of Europe and in Europe the knowledge of the Piedmont. Baustellen Europas is a bookseries devoted to Europa as cultural construction, previously published by Alpina, and now by Associazione Culturale Diàlexis Riccardo Lala, chairman of the Associazione, has participated to the making of Europe in the most diverse capacities: youth movements, trade associations, national and European civil and military public service, trade unionism, management of financial and industrial European multinationals in the areas of fashion, chemistry, energy, high tech, transportation, defense, services and publishing. He negotiated and drafted the founding documents of ELV, the company manufacturing the Vega Launcher of Arianespace, the 1st stage of Ariane as well the AVUM body of the European reusable space vehicle. revision copy revision copy Copyright 2020 By Riccardo Lala All rights of paper and digital reproduction or adaptation, partial or total, by whichever means (including microfilms and photocopies) are reserved for all countries. The publisher may grant, under payment, the authorization to reproduce a
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence
    AI Magazine Volume 26 Number 4 (2006)(2005) (© AAAI) 25th Anniversary Issue The Origins of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Raj Reddy ■ This article provides a historical background on how AAAI came into existence. It provides a ratio- nale for why we needed our own society. It pro- vides a list of the founding members of the com- munity that came together to establish AAAI. Starting a new society comes with a whole range of issues and problems: What will it be called? How will it be financed? Who will run the society? What kind of activities will it engage in? and so on. This article provides a brief description of the consider- ations that went into making the final choices. It also provides a description of the historic first AAAI conference and the people that made it happen. The Background and the Context hile the 1950s and 1960s were an ac- tive period for research in AI, there Wwere no organized mechanisms for the members of the community to get together and share ideas and accomplishments. By the early 1960s there were several active research groups in AI, including those at Carnegie Mel- lon University (CMU), the Massachusetts Insti- tute of Technology (MIT), Stanford University, Stanford Research Institute (later SRI Interna- tional), and a little later the University of Southern California Information Sciences Insti- tute (USC-ISI). My own involvement in AI began in 1963, when I joined Stanford as a graduate student working with John McCarthy. After completing my Ph.D. in 1966, I joined the faculty at Stan- ford as an assistant professor and stayed there until 1969 when I left to join Allen Newell and Herb Simon at Carnegie Mellon University Raj Reddy.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas R. Hofstadter: Extras
    Presidential Lectures: Douglas R. Hofstadter: Extras Once upon a time, I was invited to speak at an analogy workshop in the legendary city of Sofia in the far-off land of Bulgaria. Having accepted but wavering as to what to say, I finally chose to eschew technicalities and instead to convey a personal perspective on the importance and centrality of analogy-making in cognition. One way I could suggest this perspective is to rechant a refrain that I’ve chanted quite oft in the past, to wit: One should not think of analogy-making as a special variety of reasoning (as in the dull and uninspiring phrase “analogical reasoning and problem-solving,” a long-standing cliché in the cognitive-science world), for that is to do analogy a terrible disservice. After all, reasoning and problem-solving have (at least I dearly hope!) been at long last recognized as lying far indeed from the core of human thought. If analogy were merely a special variety of something that in itself lies way out on the peripheries, then it would be but an itty-bitty blip in the broad blue sky of cognition. To me, however, analogy is anything but a bitty blip — rather, it’s the very blue that fills the whole sky of cognition — analogy is everything, or very nearly so, in my view. End of oft-chanted refrain. If you don’t like it, you won’t like what follows. The thrust of my chapter is to persuade readers of this unorthodox viewpoint, or failing that, at least to give them a strong whiff of it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ubiquity of Analogy in Mathematical Thought Douglas R
    THE FIELDS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES The Nathan and Beatrice Keyfitz Lectures in Mathematics and the Social Sciences The Ubiquity of Analogy in Mathematical Thought Douglas R. Hofstadter, Indiana University March 21, 2013 — 6:00 p.m. Room 610, Health Sciences Building, University of Toronto Mathematicians generally like to present their work in the wraps of extreme rigor and pure logic. This professional posture is in some ways very admirable. However, where do their ideas really come from? Do they strictly follow the straight-and-narrow pathways of pure, rigorous, logical axiomatic deduction in order to reach their often astonishing conclusions? No. This talk will be about how deeply and universally mathematical thought, at all levels of sophistication, is riddled with impure, nonrigorous, illogical intuitions originating in analogies, often highly unconscious ones. Some of these analogies are good and some of them are bad, but good or bad, it is they that lurk behind the scenes of all mathematical thought. What is curious, to my mind, is that so few mathematicians seem to take pleasure in examining and exploring this crucial and wonderful aspect of their minds, their thoughts, and their deep discoveries. Perhaps, however, they can be stimulated to examine their own hidden thinking processes if the ubiquity of analogies can be made sufficiently vivid as to grab their interest. About Douglas Hofstadter Douglas R. Hofstadter is an American professor of cognitive science whose research focuses on the sense of “I”, consciousness, analogy-making, artistic creation, literary translation, and discovery in mathematics and physics. He is best known for his book Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, first published in 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • The Histories and Origins of Memetics
    Betwixt the Popular and Academic: The Histories and Origins of Memetics Brent K. Jesiek Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Science and Technology Studies Gary L. Downey (Chair) Megan Boler Barbara Reeves May 20, 2003 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: discipline formation, history, meme, memetics, origin stories, popularization Copyright 2003, Brent K. Jesiek Betwixt the Popular and Academic: The Histories and Origins of Memetics Brent K. Jesiek Abstract In this thesis I develop a contemporary history of memetics, or the field dedicated to the study of memes. Those working in the realm of meme theory have been generally concerned with developing either evolutionary or epidemiological approaches to the study of human culture, with memes viewed as discrete units of cultural transmission. At the center of my account is the argument that memetics has been characterized by an atypical pattern of growth, with the meme concept only moving toward greater academic legitimacy after significant development and diffusion in the popular realm. As revealed by my analysis, the history of memetics upends conventional understandings of discipline formation and the popularization of scientific ideas, making it a novel and informative case study in the realm of science and technology studies. Furthermore, this project underscores how the development of fields and disciplines is thoroughly intertwined with a larger social, cultural, and historical milieu. Acknowledgments I would like to take this opportunity to thank my family, friends, and colleagues for their invaluable encouragement and assistance as I worked on this project.
    [Show full text]