DOCSLIB.ORG

Claimant's Memorial on Merits and Damages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Claimant's Memorial on Merits and Damages Public Version INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16 SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES BETWEEN GLOBAL TELECOM HOLDING S.A.E. Claimant and GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Respondent CLAIMANT’S MEMORIAL ON THE MERITS AND DAMAGES 29 September 2017 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Telephone House 2-4 Temple Avenue London EC4Y 0HB United Kingdom GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 United States of America Public Version TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 II. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 3 III. Canada’s Wireless Telecommunications Market And Framework For The 2008 AWS Auction................................................................................................................................. 17 A. Overview Of Canada’s Wireless Telecommunications Market Leading Up To The 2008 AWS Auction.............................................................................................. 17 1. Introduction to Wireless Telecommunications .................................................. 17 2. Canada’s Wireless Telecommunications Market At The Time Of The 2008 AWS Auction ............................................................................................ 20 B. The 2008 AWS Auction Framework And Its Key Conditions ................................... 23 1. The Terms Of The AWS Auction Consultation ................................................ 26 2. The Terms Of The Spectrum Policy Framework ............................................... 30 3. The Terms Of The Spectrum Licensing Procedure ........................................... 32 4. The Terms Of The AWS Auction Policy Framework ....................................... 34 5. The Terms Of The AWS Auction Licensing Framework .................................. 39 6. The Mandatory Roaming & Tower/Site Sharing Policies ................................. 40 7. The Ownership & Control Rules ....................................................................... 44 IV. GTH Invests In Canada In Reliance On The 2008 AWS Auction Framework ................... 48 A. Background To GTH’s Decision To Invest In Wind Mobile ..................................... 48 B. GTH Structures Wind Mobile To Take Advantage Of The Anticipated Relaxation Of The O&C Rules ................................................................................... 54 1. The Structure Of GTH’s Investment In Wind Mobile ....................................... 54 2. GTH’s Equity Contribution And Loans ............................................................. 58 C. Overview Of GTH’s Key Expectations At The Time GTH Begins Its Investment In Canada ................................................................................................. 59 i i Public Version V. Canada’s Wrongful Acts that cumulatively prevented GTH from benefiting from its C$ 1.3 Billion Investment.......................................................................................................... 71 A. The Duplicative And Inconsistent Ownership & Control Reviews ............................ 73 1. Industry Canada Confirms Wind Mobile’s Compliance With The O&C Rules .................................................................................................................. 74 2. The CRTC Conducts A Duplicative, Targeted, & Public Second Review Of Wind Mobile’s Compliance With The O&C Rules, And Reaches A Conflicting And Incorrect Decision ................................................................... 76 B. Canada Fails To Address Key Barriers To Market Entry In Contradiction of Prior Representations To Encourage Investment ........................................................ 85 1. Canada Ignored Repeated Requests To Enforce A Fair Regulatory Environment ....................................................................................................... 87 2. Canada Only Began To Address The Regulatory Environment When the Five-Year Rollout Period Neared Expiration .................................................... 96 C. Canada Repudiates The 2008 AWS Auction Framework And Implements Measures That Destroy The Value Of GTH’s Investment ......................................... 97 1. Canada Relaxes The O&C Rules .............................................................................................................. 98 The Relaxation Of The O&C Rules .......................................................... 98 On Vague Unspecified “National Security” Grounds .............................................. 105 2. GTH’s Attempts To Sell Wind Mobile To An Incumbent Are Blocked By The Establishment And Implementation Of A New Transfer Framework ....................................................................................................... 119 Incumbents Offer To Purchase Wind Mobile ......................................... 119 Canada Announces Its 2013 Transfer Consultation................................ 123 The Negotiations With Incumbents Continue......................................... 127 Canada Releases The 2013 Transfer Framework Effectively Prohibiting GTH’s Sale Of Wind Mobile To An Incumbent ................. 133 D. Owing To The Wrongful Acts Committed By Canada, GTH Is Left With No Commercially Reasonable Alternative Other Than To Exit The Canadian Market ....................................................................................................................... 139 ii Public Version E. After GTH’s Forced Exit, Canada Facilitates Wind Mobile’s Sale To Shaw .......... 145 VI. The Tribunal Has Jurisdiction To Decide The Dispute ..................................................... 149 A. The Tribunal Has Jurisdiction Over This Dispute In Accordance With The BIT And Article 25 Of The ICSID Convention........................................................ 149 1. The Requirements Of The BIT Have Been Met .............................................. 151 GTH Is A Protected Investor That Has Made An Investment For The Purposes Of The BIT ....................................................................... 151 There Is A Qualifying Dispute For the Purposes Of The BIT ................ 153 The Parties Have Provided Their Written Consent To ICSID’s Jurisdiction For the Purposes Of The BIT .............................................. 154 All Remaining Requirements Of The BIT Have Been Met .................... 154 2. The Requirements Of Article 25 Of The ICSID Convention Have Been Met ................................................................................................................... 155 3. The Tribunal Has Jurisdiction To Decide The Dispute ................................... 156 B. The Applicable Law Of This Dispute Is The BIT And Applicable Rules of International Law ...................................................................................................... 156 VII. Canada Has Breached Fundamental Obligations Under the BIT ...................................... 158 A. Canada Has Failed To Afford GTH’s Investment Fair And Equitable Treatment .................................................................................................................. 161 1. The Fair And Equitable Treatment Standard ................................................... 161 2. Canada Breached The Fair And Equitable Treatment Standard When It Blocked GTH From Transferring Wind Mobile’s Licenses To An Incumbent After The Five-Year Rollout Period .............................................. 172 Canada Breached Its Obligation To Afford Fair And Equitable Treatment By Frustrating GTH’s Legitimate Expectation That It Would Be Permitted To Transfer Wind Mobile’s Licenses To An Incumbent After The Five-Year Rollout Period ..................................... 173 i. GTH Had The Legitimate Expectation That It Would Be Permitted To Transfer Wind Mobile’s Licenses To An Incumbent After The Five-Year Rollout Period ............................ 173 ii. GTH Relied On Canada’s Representations In Making Its Decision To Invest ......................................................................... 180 iii Public Version iii. Canada Frustrated GTH’s Legitimate Expectations When It Revised The Transfer Framework And Blocked The Sale Of Wind Mobile’s Licenses To An Incumbent ................................... 183 Canada Breached Its Obligation To Afford Fair And Equitable Treatment By Unreasonably and Arbitrarily Blocking GTH From Transferring Wind Mobile’s Licenses To An Incumbent After Five Years ....................................................................................................... 190 3. Canada Breached The Fair And Equitable Treatment Standard On The Pretext Of An Arbitrary National Security Review ................................................................ 196 4. Canada’s Wrongful Measures Cumulatively Amount To A Breach Of The FET Standard ............................................................................................ 204 B. GTH’s Investment Has Not Been Accorded Full Protection And Security.............. 214 C. Canada Has Breached The Guarantee Of Unrestricted Transfer of Investments ..... 218 D. GTH’s Investment Has Not Been Accorded National Treatment Protection ........... 220 VIII. GTH Is Entitled To Full Reparation .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core 1..39 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 40e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 2 No 2 Thursday, March 4, 2010 Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES TABLING OF DOCUMENTS DÉPÔT DE DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Conformément à l'article 32(2) du Règlement, M. Lukiwski Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Chambre Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, des communes) dépose sur le Bureau, — Réponses du pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: gouvernement, conformément à l’article 36(8) du Règlement, aux pétitions suivantes : — Nos. 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, — nos 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, 402- 402-1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 402- 402-1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 and 402-1513 1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 et 402-1513 au sujet du concerning the Employment Insurance Program. — Sessional régime d'assurance-emploi. — Document parlementaire no 8545- Paper No. 8545-403-1-01; 403-1-01; — Nos. 402-1129, 402-1174 and 402-1268 concerning national — nos 402-1129, 402-1174 et 402-1268 au sujet des parcs parks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-2-01; nationaux. — Document parlementaire no 8545-403-2-01; — Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • ONLINE INCIVILITY and ABUSE in CANADIAN POLITICS Chris
    ONLINE INCIVILITY AND ABUSE IN CANADIAN POLITICS Chris Tenove Heidi Tworek TROLLED ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL ONLINE INCIVILITY AND ABUSE IN CANADIAN POLITICS CHRIS TENOVE • HEIDI TWOREK COPYRIGHT Copyright © 2020 Chris Tenove; Heidi Tworek; Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. CITATION Tenove, Chris, and Heidi Tworek (2020) Trolled on the Campaign Trail: Online Incivility and Abuse in Canadian Politics. Vancouver: Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia. CONTACT DETAILS Chris Tenove, [email protected] (Corresponding author) Heidi Tworek, [email protected] CONTENTS AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES ..................................................................................................................1 RESEARCHERS ...............................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................5 FACING INCIVILITY IN #ELXN43 ....................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..196 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 144 Ï NUMBER 025 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 40th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, March 6, 2009 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1393 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, March 6, 2009 The House met at 10 a.m. Some hon. members: Yes. The Speaker: The House has heard the terms of the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? Prayers Some hon. members: Agreed. (Motion agreed to) GOVERNMENT ORDERS Mr. Mark Warawa (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment, CPC) moved that Bill C-17, An Act to Ï (1005) recognize Beechwood Cemetery as the national cemetery of Canada, [English] be read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. NATIONAL CEMETERY OF CANADA ACT He said: Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin by seeking unanimous Hon. Jay Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of consent to share my time. Commons, CPC): Mr. Speaker, momentarily, I will be proposing a motion by unanimous consent to expedite passage through the The Speaker: Does the hon. member have unanimous consent to House of an important new bill, An Act to recognize Beechwood share his time? Cemetery as the national cemetery of Canada. However, before I Some hon. members: Agreed. propose my motion, which has been agreed to in advance by all parties, I would like to take a quick moment to thank my colleagues Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Competition in Canada's Telecommunications
    RESEARCH PAPERS MAY 2016 THE STATE OF COMPETITION IN CANADA’S TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY – 2016 By Martin Masse and Paul Beaudry The Montreal Economic Institute is an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profi t research and educational organization. Through its publications, media appearances and conferences, the MEI stimu- lates debate on public policies in Quebec and across Canada by pro- posing wealth-creating reforms based on market mechanisms. It does 910 Peel Street, Suite 600 not accept any government funding. Montreal (Quebec) H3C 2H8 Canada The opinions expressed in this study do not necessarily represent those of the Montreal Economic Institute or of the members of its Phone: 514-273-0969 board of directors. The publication of this study in no way implies Fax: 514-273-2581 that the Montreal Economic Institute or the members of its board of Website: www.iedm.org directors are in favour of or oppose the passage of any bill. The MEI’s members and donors support its overall research program. Among its members and donors are companies active in the tele- communications sector, whose fi nancial contribution corresponds to around 4.5% of the MEI’s total budget. These companies had no input into the process of preparing the fi nal text of this Research Paper, nor any control over its public dissemination. Reproduction is authorized for non-commercial educational purposes provided the source is mentioned. ©2016 Montreal Economic Institute ISBN 978-2-922687-65-1 Legal deposit: 2nd quarter 2016 Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
    [Show full text]
  • ILCL-ILSL MONTHLY Economy and Market Review
    April 2014 ILCL-ILSL MONTHLY Economy and Market Review YOUR MONEY MANAGER www.il-capital.com www.ilslbd.com IL Capital Limited and International Leasing Securities Limited are subsidiaries of International Leasing and Financial Services Limited Addressing Your Financial Concerns In today’s competitive world, each of you is looking for growth opportunities. While some of you are considering expansion of your existing business, others are looking for expansion in a new field. Some may feel that working capital management is the priority while others need to focus on financial efficiency. Many have suffered from high interest burden in the past while others are looking for scope to minimize tax burden to safeguard a substantial profit. Few need hands-on assistance to explore business opportunities with major industry players while others require a strategic plan to make an acquisition successful. Yes, we are talking about financial restructuring and investment alternatives. And a lot of questions come and wait in mind. Which type of financing is the best solution? Is it going to fit the long term strategy of the organization? Is it sustain- able? Are you ready for this? Faced with such dilemmas, what you need is an expert who can offer a wide array of financial services and benefits with comparative analyses of feasible alternatives. Yes. IL Capital can do this for you. We oer – • Issue Management & Underwriting • Loan Syndication & Private Equity • Merger & Acquisition • Advisory Services for any other Financial Restructuring requirement that our clients may have Realizing Your Investment Dream We are offering investment management solutions to both individuals and corporate entities.
    [Show full text]
  • SFU Thesis Template Files
    The Right to Authentic Political Communication by Ann Elizabeth Rees M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2005 B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1980 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Communication Faculty of Arts and Social Science Ann Elizabeth Rees 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2016 Approval Name: Ann Elizabeth Rees Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: The Right to Authentic Political Communication Examining Committee: Chair: Katherine Reilly, Assistant Professor Peter Anderson Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Catherine Murray Supervisor Professor Alison Beale Supervisor Professor Andrew Heard Internal Examiner Associate Professor Political Science Department Paul Thomas External Examiner Professor Emeritus Department of Political Studies University of Manitoba Date Defended/Approved: January 22, 2016 ii Abstract Increasingly, governments communicate strategically with the public for political advantage, seeking as Christopher Hood describes it to “avoid blame” and “claim credit” for the actions and decisions of governance. In particular, Strategic Political Communication (SPC) is becoming the dominant form of political communication between Canada’s executive branch of government and the public, both during elections and as part of a “permanent campaign” to gain and maintain public support as means to political power. This dissertation argues that SPC techniques interfere with the public’s ability to know how they are governed, and therefore undermines the central right of citizens in a democracy to legitimate elected representation by scrutinizing government and holding it to account. Realization of that right depends on an authentic political communication process that provides citizens with an understanding of government. By seeking to hide or downplay blameworthy actions, SPC undermines the legitimation role public discourse plays in a democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vimpelcom Ltd
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F Registration Statement Pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 OR ⌧ Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 OR Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 OR Shell Company Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Commission File Number: 1-34694 VIMPELCOM LTD. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Bermuda (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) Claude Debussylaan 88, 1082 MD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Address of principal executive offices) Jeffrey D. McGhie Group General Counsel & Chief Corporate Affairs Officer Claude Debussylaan 88, 1082 MD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Tel: +31 20 797 7200 Fax: +31 20 797 7201 (Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, each representing one common share New York Stock Exchange Common shares, US$ 0.001 nominal value New York Stock Exchange* * Listed, not for trading or quotation purposes, but only in connection with the registration of ADSs pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 1,628,199,135 common shares, US$ 0.001 nominal value.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book
    The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Competition in Canada: an Assessment
    Volume 6•Issue 27•September 2013 WIRELESS COMPETITION IN CANADA: AN ASSESSMENT Jeffrey Church † Professor, Department of Economics and Director, Digital Economy Program, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary Andrew Wilkins † Research Associate, Digital Economy Program, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary SUMMARY If there’s one thing Canadians agree on, it’s that Canada’s wireless industry can and should be more competitive. The federal government is on side with the policy objective of having four carriers in every region and has responded with policies that provide commercial advantages to entrants. But, the rub is that there has not been a study that actually assesses the state of competition in wireless services in Canada, until now. Those in favour of policies that will promote and sustain entry point to Canada’s high average revenue per user and low wireless penetration rate (mobile connections per capita) as evidence that there is insufficient competition. The difficulty is that the facts are not consistent with this simplistic analysis. Measurements of wireless penetration are skewed toward countries that maintain the Calling Party Pays Protocol and favour pay-as-you-go plans, both of which encourage inflated user counts. Canada’s participation per capita on monthly plans and minutes of voice per capita are not outliers. Moreover, in terms of smartphone adoption and smartphone data usage, Canada is a global leader, contributing to high average revenue per user. Consistent with being world leaders in the rollout of high speed wireless networks, Canada lead its peer group in capital expenditures per subscriber in 2012: the competition of importance to Canadians is not just over price, but also over the quality of wireless networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Canada's Doors to Foreign Investment in Telecommunications
    Response To: Opening Canada’s Doors to Foreign Investment in Telecommunications: Options for Reform Industry Canada Consultation Paper June 2010 Section 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mobilicity is pleased to be given an opportunity to respond to the recently published Industry Canada Consultation Paper on foreign investment in Telecommunications. We have reviewed the various foreign investment options suggested in the publication, and would like to specifically support Option 2 – The Telecommunications Policy Review Plan / Competition Policy Review Panel approach – specifically allowing smaller telecom players to be exempt from current restrictions related to foreign investment in telecommunications. In summary, we believe Option 2 will help facilitate fair competition among telecom companies and deliver the most consumer benefits of all the options under consideration. As will be discussed, telecommunications companies, in particular wireless operators, are capital intensive due to the large network and employee base required to offer service. Moreover, for new entrants and smaller operators, there is significant risk in their business plans because much of the capital outlay is required in advance of attracting subscribers, their large fixed cost base means that it is often many years before they can generate positive cash flow, and in the interim the incumbent competition can take predatory actions to impact smaller companies‟ viability. The result, therefore, is that while all telecommunications carriers need regular access to capital, new entrants in particular need access to “risk capital”, which is funding for earlier stage companies, many of which are not developed enough to be traded publicly. In Canada, there is ample domestic capital available for mature, relatively safe businesses such as telecommunication incumbents, but the amount of risk capital available is small relative to the requirements of new entrants and smaller operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Telenor East Holding II AS V. Altimo &
    Neutral Citation Number: [2011] EWHC 735 (Comm) Case No: 2011 Folio 139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION COMMERCIAL COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 1st March 2011 Before : MRS JUSTICE GLOSTER, DBE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Telenor East Holding II AS Applicant - and - (1 Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd Respondents (2 Altimo Cooperatief UA (3 VimpelCom Ltd - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Joe Smouha Esq, QC, Vernon Flynn Esq, QC, Paul McGrath Esq and James Willan Esq (instructed by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Europe) LLP) for the Applicant Huw Davies Esq, QC, Stephen Houseman Esq and Anton Dudnikov Esq (instructed by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP) for the First & Second Respondents Mark Howard Esq, QC and Oliver Jones Esq (instructed by Akin Gump LLP) for the Third Respondents Hearing dates: 25th February 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judgment Mrs Justice Gloster, DBE: 1. This is an application for an interim injunction pursuant to section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 which is made by the claimant, Telenor East Holdings II AS (“Telenor”), for an injunction restraining the third respondent, VimpelCom Limited (“VimpelCom”), and the first and second respondents, Altimo Holdings & Investments Limited ad Altimo Cooperatief UA, the latter as a shareholder in VimpelCom, from taking any action to convene, or proceed with, or vote at, a Special General Meeting of VimpelCom’s shareholders
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Performance 5
    GIVING THE WORLD A VOICE ORASCOM TELECOM HOLDING Full Year 2010 Orascom Telecom Holding YE – 2009 Page | 1 GIVING THE WORLD A VOICE CONTENT Highlights 3 CEO’s Comment 4 Operational Performance 5 Main Financial Events 9 Financial Review 14 Financial Statements 20 Operational Overview 25 Orascom Telecom Holding YE – 2009 Page | 2 GIVING THE WORLD A VOICE Orascom Telecom Holding Full Year 2010 Results Cairo, April 18th, 2011: Orascom Telecom Holding (OTH) (Ticker: ORTE.CA, ORTEq.L, ORAT EY, OTLD LI), announces its year end 2010 consolidated results. Highlights • On 4 January 2011, OTH sold its entire shareholding in Orascom Tunisia Holding and Carthage Consortium through which OTH owned 50% of Orascom Telecom Tunisia (“OTT”). As a result the proportionate consolidation of OTT during Q4 is no longer applicable under IFRS as it renders the entity an investment held for sale, and consequently a discontinued operation under IFRS rules. Figures for 2009 and 9M 2010 have been restated to reflect the accounting treatment of OTT. • Total subscribers exceeded 101 million, an increase of 16% over the same period last year. • Net Income before minority interest showed a sharp increase of 106% compared to the same period last year, reaching US$ 781 million1 for the period ending December 31st, 2010, mainly due to the gain recognized on the Mobinil transaction by comparing the carrying amount of the investments in Mobinil and ECMS to the relevant fair value, taking into consideration the net proceeds from the transaction for the global settlement fee amounting to US$300 million. • Revenues reached US$ 3,825 million1, increasing by 2% over the previous year as a result of strong growth in all GSM operations, with the exception of Algeria.
    [Show full text]