DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 BCE Q4 Safe Harbour Notice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 BCE Q4 Safe Harbour Notice BCE INC. Safe Harbour Notice Concerning Forward-Looking Statements February 6, 2014 Safe Harbour Notice Concerning Forward-Looking Statements In this document, we, us, our and BCE mean either BCE Inc. or, collectively, BCE Inc., its subsidiaries, joint arrangements and associates. Bell means our Bell Wireline, Bell Wireless and Bell Media segments on an aggregate basis. Bell Aliant means either Bell Aliant Inc. or, collectively, Bell Aliant Inc., its subsidiaries and associates. Certain statements made in the presentations entitled “Q4 2013 Results and 2014 Analyst Guidance Call”, dated February 6, 2014, and certain oral statements made by our senior management during Bell’s 2014 analyst guidance call held on February 6, 2014 (Bell’s 2014 Analyst Guidance Call), including, but not limited to, statements relating to BCE’s financial guidance (including revenues, EBITDA, capital intensity (Capital Intensity), Adjusted EPS and free cash flow (Free Cash Flow))1, BCE’s business outlook, objectives, plans and strategic priorities, BCE’s 2014 annualized common share dividend, common share dividend policy and targeted dividend payout ratio, Bell Canada’s financial policy targets, our expected 2014 pension cash funding, revenues and EBITDA expected to be generated from growth services, our broadband fibre, Internet protocol television (IPTV) and wireless networks deployment plans, and other statements that are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements. In addition, we or others on our behalf may make other written or oral statements that are forward-looking from time to time. A statement we make is forward-looking when it uses what we know and expect today to make a statement about the future. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the words “assumption”, “goal”, “guidance”, “objective”, “outlook”, “project”, “strategy”, “target” and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “aim”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “seek”, “should”, “strive” and “will”. All such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the ‘safe harbour’ provisions of applicable Canadian securities laws and of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements made in the presentations entitled “Q4 2013 Results and 2014 Analyst Guidance Call”, or made orally during Bell’s 2014 Analyst Guidance Call, are made as of February 6, 2014 and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. Except as may be required by Canadian securities laws, we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements, by their very nature, are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties and are based on several assumptions, both general and specific, which give rise to the possibility that actual results could differ materially from our expectations expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements and that our financial guidance, business outlook, objectives, plans and strategic priorities may not be achieved. As a result, we cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will materialize and we caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. Refer to Section B entitled Material Assumptions Made in the Preparation of Forward-Looking Statements for a description of the principal assumptions underlying the above-mentioned forward-looking statements and other forward-looking statements made in the presentations entitled “Q4 2013 Results and 2014 Analyst Guidance Call” and made orally during Bell’s 2014 Analyst Guidance Call held on 1 Refer to footnotes 3 to 6 in Section A entitled Forward-Looking Statements for a definition of, and other information concerning, EBITDA, Capital Intensity, Adjusted EPS and Free Cash Flow. i February 6, 2014. Refer to Section C entitled Risks that Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Forward-Looking Statements for a description of the principal known risks that could have a material adverse effect on the above-mentioned forward-looking statements and other forward- looking statements made in the presentations entitled “Q4 2013 Results and 2014 Analyst Guidance Call” and made orally during Bell’s 2014 Analyst Guidance Call. Except as otherwise indicated by BCE, these statements do not reflect the potential impact of any non-recurring or other special items or of any dispositions, monetizations, mergers, acquisitions, other business combinations or other transactions that may be announced or that may occur after the date hereof. The financial impact of these transactions and non-recurring and other special items can be complex and depends on the facts particular to each of them. We therefore cannot describe the expected impact in a meaningful way or in the same way we present known risks affecting our business. Forward-looking statements made in writing in connection with, or orally during, Bell’s 2014 Analyst Guidance Call are presented for the purpose of assisting investors and others in understanding certain key elements of our expected 2014 financial results, as well as our objectives, strategic priorities and business outlook, and in obtaining a better understanding of our anticipated operating environment. Readers are cautioned, however, that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS A. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ......................................................................................... 2 B. MATERIAL ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN THE PREPARATION OF FORWARD- LOOKING STATEMENTS ................................................................................................................ 3 C. RISKS THAT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR FORWARD- LOOKING STATEMENTS ................................................................................................................ 6 I. RISKS RELATING TO OUR COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................ 6 II. RISKS RELATING TO OUR REGULATORY AND GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT ............................ 16 III. OTHER RISKS THAT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 22 Sections A, B and C of this document contain, respectively, a description of: • the principal forward-looking statements relating to financial guidance contained in the presentations entitled “Q4 2013 Results and 2014 Analyst Guidance Call”; • the material assumptions made by BCE in developing such principal forward-looking statements; and • the principal known risks that could cause our assumptions and estimates to be inaccurate and actual results or events to differ materially from our current expectations expressed in or implied by our principal forward-looking statements. 1 A. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This section outlines the principal elements of the financial guidance provided by BCE for 2014. Bell2 Guidance for 2014 Revenue growth 2% - 4% EBITDA3 growth 3% - 5% Capital Intensity4 16% - 17% BCE Guidance for 2014 Adjusted net earnings per common share $3.10 - $3.20 (Adjusted EPS)5 Adjusted EPS growth ~4% - 7% Free Cash Flow6 $2,650 million - $2,750 million Free Cash Flow growth ~3% - 7% Annualized common share dividend7 $2.47 per share8 Dividend Payout Policy 65%-75% of Free Cash Flow Dividend Target Payout9 ~70% 2 Revenue, EBITDA and Capital Intensity guidance targets are for Bell excluding Bell Aliant. 3 The term EBITDA does not have any standardized meaning under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Therefore, it is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. We define EBITDA as operating revenues less operating costs, as shown in BCE’s consolidated income statements. We use EBITDA to evaluate the performance of our businesses as it reflects their ongoing profitability. We believe that certain investors and analysts use EBITDA to measure a company’s ability to service debt and to meet other payment obligations or as a common measurement to value companies in the telecommunications industry. EBITDA also is one component in the determination of short-term incentive compensation for all management employees. EBITDA has no directly comparable IFRS financial measure. 4 Capital Intensity means capital expenditures as a percentage of revenues. 5 The terms Adjusted net earnings and Adjusted EPS do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS. Therefore, they are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. We define Adjusted net earnings as net earnings attributable to common shareholders before severance, acquisition and other costs, net (gains) losses on investments, and premiums on early redemption of debt. We define Adjusted EPS as Adjusted net earnings per BCE common share. We use Adjusted net earnings and Adjusted EPS, and we believe that certain investors and analysts use these measures, among other ones, to assess the performance of our businesses without the effects of severance, acquisition and other costs, net (gains) losses on investments and premiums on early redemption of debt, net of tax and non-controlling interest. We exclude these items because they affect the comparability of our financial results and could potentially distort the analysis of trends in business performance. Excluding these items does not
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TWU Wrestles with Telus in Court
    Union optimistic after VoIP hearings By Sid Shniad, TWU Research Director The TWU urged the have phone conversations companies be regulated in the Transmitter article by Rod) the effects of deregulation and Canadian Radio-television over the Internet, should be same way as VoIP provided that telephone companies are were taking the TWU’s call to and Telecommunications regulated in the same way as by telephone companies, and using VoIP to restructure their regulate all of the players in Commission (CRTC) to fully wireline service, TWU the CRTC shouldn’t let any operations and finances to the sector seriously. It is too regulate Voice-over Internet president Rod Hiebert, lawyer company offer VoIP until it is avoid regulatory oversight. early to tell what this will Protocol (VoIP), in a three- Jim Aldridge and I told the capable of providing During the hearing, it ultimately mean, but the signs day hearing held late CRTC. The TWU also emergency services like 911. became clear that at least are good. After years of September in Ottawa. recommended that VoIP The TWU pointed out (as some of the CRTC panel participating in proceedings Vo IP, which allows users to service provided by cable detailed in a recent members are concerned about (see TWU urges -- page 5) October 2004 XXVI 2 TWU wrestles with Telus in court Last January the deal was Then, just a couple of accusations of bias, but unacceptable, and appealed the Board in Letter Decision sealed. It was good news. weeks later, the company flip- instead dismissed them as for a Judicial Review in the 1004.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Wireless
    Canada Wireless 1/22/15 Market Opportunity • Canada has over 29 million wireless subscribers. 79% of all wireless subscribers are Post Paid Customers and 21% are Pre- Paid Customers • Telus is one of the top 3 wireless carriers with over 28.9% of the market • A 2014 study showed that 55% of Canadians owned a smartphone. In 2015 the penetration rate grew to 68%, representing a year-over-year growth of 24%. • Since 2008 the average wireless price has decreased by 22% • As of summer 2015, the amount of spectrum available to provide mobile services to consumers has grown by almost 60 percent, allowing Canadians and their families to benefit from the latest technologies and world-class services. Why TELUS? • Latest Greatest Devices - find the phone that's right for you, including an iPhone! • Great Network - Our state-of-the-art 4G network is now faster with Canada’s most advanced LTE technology. Get our very best speeds available for your device no matter where you are. • TELUS Your Choice Plans - Choose the phone you want and the amounts of voice and data you need. Your Choice lets you create a custom mobile phone plan with flexibility and savings for you, or your entire family. • Best of the Internet - access to the apps and services you love the most Target Market Wireless Service • Canadian Post Paid Residential Customers • The value conscious consumer who is looking for the latest smart phone at the best price on the market! • We offer international roaming with talk & text in over 200 countries, and email and web in over 100 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Claimant's Memorial on Merits and Damages
    Public Version INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16 SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES BETWEEN GLOBAL TELECOM HOLDING S.A.E. Claimant and GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Respondent CLAIMANT’S MEMORIAL ON THE MERITS AND DAMAGES 29 September 2017 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Telephone House 2-4 Temple Avenue London EC4Y 0HB United Kingdom GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 United States of America Public Version TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 II. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 3 III. Canada’s Wireless Telecommunications Market And Framework For The 2008 AWS Auction................................................................................................................................. 17 A. Overview Of Canada’s Wireless Telecommunications Market Leading Up To The 2008 AWS Auction.............................................................................................. 17 1. Introduction to Wireless Telecommunications .................................................. 17 2. Canada’s Wireless Telecommunications Market At The Time Of The 2008 AWS Auction ............................................................................................ 20 B. The 2008 AWS Auction Framework And Its Key Conditions ................................... 23 1. The Terms Of The AWS Auction Consultation
    [Show full text]
  • Cologix Torix Case Study
    Internet Exchange Case Study The Toronto Internet Exchange (TorIX) is the largest IX in Canada with more than 175 peering participants benefiting from lower network costs & faster speeds The non-profit Toronto Internet Exchange (TorIX) is a multi-connection point enabling members to use one hardwired connection to exchange traffic with 175+ members on the exchange. With peering participants swapping traffic with one another through direct connections, TorIX reduces transit times for local data exchange and cuts the significant costs of Internet bandwidth. The success of TorIX is underlined by its tremendous growth, exceeding 145 Gbps as one of the largest IXs in the world. TorIX is in Cologix’s data centre at 151 Front Street, Toronto’s carrier hotel and the country’s largest telecommunications hub in the heart of Toronto. TorIX members define their own routing protocols to dictate their traffic flow, experiencing faster speeds with their data packets crossing fewer hops between the point of origin and destination. Additionally, by keeping traffic local, Canadian data avoids international networks, easing concerns related to privacy and security. Above: In Dec. 2014, TorIX traffic peaked above 140 Gbps, with average traffic hovering around 90 Gbps. Beginning Today Launched in July 1996 Direct TorIX on-ramp in Cologix’s151 Front Street Ethernet-based, layer 2 connectivity data centre in Toronto TorIX-owned switches capable of handling Second largest independent IX in North America ample traffic Operated by telecom industry volunteers IPv4 & IPv6 address provided to each peering Surpassed 145 Gbps with 175+ peering member to use on the IX participants, including the Canadian Broke the 61 Gbps mark in Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Competition in Canada: an Assessment
    Volume 6•Issue 27•September 2013 WIRELESS COMPETITION IN CANADA: AN ASSESSMENT Jeffrey Church † Professor, Department of Economics and Director, Digital Economy Program, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary Andrew Wilkins † Research Associate, Digital Economy Program, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary SUMMARY If there’s one thing Canadians agree on, it’s that Canada’s wireless industry can and should be more competitive. The federal government is on side with the policy objective of having four carriers in every region and has responded with policies that provide commercial advantages to entrants. But, the rub is that there has not been a study that actually assesses the state of competition in wireless services in Canada, until now. Those in favour of policies that will promote and sustain entry point to Canada’s high average revenue per user and low wireless penetration rate (mobile connections per capita) as evidence that there is insufficient competition. The difficulty is that the facts are not consistent with this simplistic analysis. Measurements of wireless penetration are skewed toward countries that maintain the Calling Party Pays Protocol and favour pay-as-you-go plans, both of which encourage inflated user counts. Canada’s participation per capita on monthly plans and minutes of voice per capita are not outliers. Moreover, in terms of smartphone adoption and smartphone data usage, Canada is a global leader, contributing to high average revenue per user. Consistent with being world leaders in the rollout of high speed wireless networks, Canada lead its peer group in capital expenditures per subscriber in 2012: the competition of importance to Canadians is not just over price, but also over the quality of wireless networks.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Format Or in HTML at the Following Internet Site
    Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-39 Ottawa, 6 July 2005 Alberta Health and Wellness' request for code 8-1-1 for non-urgent health teletriage services Reference: 8665-A83-200409492 and 8698-C12-200415928 In this Decision, the Commission approves an application from Alberta Health and Wellness requesting the assignment of an N-1-1 code, specifically 8-1-1, for access to non-urgent health care telephone triage services. The application 1. The Commission received an application from Alberta Health and Wellness, on behalf of the provincial and territorial Deputy Ministers of Health (Alberta Health and Wellness), dated 24 August 2004, filed pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure. Alberta Health and Wellness requested that the Commission assign the 3-1-1 code for non-commercial use across Canada for access to first level health care telephone triage services (teletriage services). 2. Alberta Health and Wellness stated that teletriage service has been identified by all provincial and territorial Deputy Ministers of Health as an important component in primary care restructuring and reform. Teletriage service, as a component of primary care systems, would improve access to primary health care services, the quality and efficiency of those services, and the results for patients who use those services. 3. In Assignment of 311 for non-emergency municipal government services, Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-71, 5 November 2004 (Decision 2004-71), the Commission approved the assignment of the 3-1-1 code for access to non-emergency municipal government services. 4. Concurrent with the release of Decision 2004-71, on 5 November 2004, Commission staff issued a letter announcing that the 5-1-1 and 8-1-1 resources were available for reassignment and invited the applicant to amend its application to request an available three digit code (N-1-1), given that the 3-1-1 resource was no longer available.
    [Show full text]
  • TELUS Corporation Annual Information Form for the Year Ended
    TELUS Corporation annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2005 March 20, 2006 FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.................................................................................................2 TELUS .........................................................................................................................................................2 OPERATIONS, ORGANIZATION AND CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS ...................................5 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS .....................................................................................................................14 CAPITAL ASSETS AND GOODWILL.................................................................................................15 ALLIANCES .............................................................................................................................................17 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ........................................................................................................................20 FOREIGN OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONS.........................................................................................22 REGULATION .........................................................................................................................................23 COMPETITION .......................................................................................................................................32 DIVIDENDS DECLARED.......................................................................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • Canadas Top Media Concentration Canada 2016 Download
    % MARKET Wireline SHARE Canada’s Top Media, Internet & Telecom Wireless Internet Access Companies by Market Share (2016) Cable cmcrp.org | [email protected] Broadcast TV & Pay TV 44% * y 29% Radio Newspaper & Magazine 22% Internet Advertising & Subscriptions 16.5% onom 27% Over-the-top (OTT) Subscriptions 26.8% 3% 30% 0.2% ers 32% Wireline POWER CORP Bell, Bell Alliant, NorthwestTel, DMTS, Télébec y 15% 22% 4% e media ec 15.5% Wireless 0.3% 18% 2% Bell Mobility, Virgin Mobile, Solo Mobile , tir Inukshuk (Joint-venture 50/50 with Rogers) 0.2% 3% GLOBE & MAIL 27% 12% Internet Access GROUPE Newspaper 29% Cable CAPITALE Wireline Broadcast TV & Pay TV 0.7% 11% 12% Bell Satellite, Bell Fibe, Cablevision du Nord MEDIA Wireless 12% Newspaper 4% 71.1% 4% Rogers Wireless, Fido, Chatr , 9% Internet Adverising & Subscriptions 7.7% 1% Inukshuk (Joint-venture 50/50 with Bell) Internet Access Over-the-top (OTT) Subscriptions 72% Wireline 6% Cable Over-the-top (OTT) top 5 pla Subscriptions 4% Wireless Broadcast TV & Pay TV BRO ADCAS T TV 2% Telus Mobility, ol 71.1 % of the en Koodo, Public Mobile Internet Adverising & Subscriptions Internet Access tr 13% Over-the-top (OTT) Subscriptions 23% Cable con 17% 9% Wireline PAY TV Wireless - WIND/Freedom BRO ADCAS T TV 1% Internet Access 6% TORSTAR 4.7% Cable Newspaper PAY TV 0.9% 1% Broadcast TV & Pay TV eastlink 2% 3% Internet Adverising & Subscriptions Metroland Media Group 0.8% 3% Over-the-top (OTT) Subscriptions 16% Radio 2% Wireline 10% BRO ADCAS T TV 12% Radio Internet Access Wireline 5% Cable Wireless
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Phone Plans Canada
    Cell Phone Plans Canada Winston avulse downstage. Jaggier and corroded Sheffie fullers her antioxidants seedling unearths and recondense fourth. Blooded Hakim rearisen his moonwalk ptyalize irefully. Terms of information purposes only the signal strength and book a contract, and save money and more about data at telus mobility in ontario, jump to cell phone plans We considered if necessary at rogers plans is good cell phone plans canada, canada and improved indoor reception. So, familiar is all the early important supplement you to hunt down the cheapest plan say the great of features you need. Talk were often and green long response you wish. All plans that matches your service is the best telecom what is that the savings? Who is the best big phone provider in Canada? What cell phone or canada to your cell phone plans canada? There are typically use fido has on the best deals. Cookies to your bill cycle. AlwaysOnline Wireless is express on-demand 4G LTE service you over 45 countries with plans by half hour by the stack or recount the megabyte They sell physical SIM cards. Buy more family cell phone plans that it or degradation in cell phone plan deals on your phone. If geo_data is your account? Mobile advisor can afford it for two dozen countries may impact your phone. This is subject to canada for money to your travel plug adapters to cell phone plans canada. Upgrade will not influence your cell phone plans is subject to quickly jump to expect. Happy with you how the cell phone plans canada at any percentage discount cell phone plans offered by visiting www.
    [Show full text]
  • What Matters to You Matters to Us 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
    what matters to you matters to us 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Our products and services Wireless TELUS provides Clear & Simple® prepaid and postpaid voice and data solutions to 7.8 million customers on world-class nationwide wireless networks. Leading networks and devices: Total coverage of 99% of Canadians over a coast-to-coast 4G network, including 4G LTE and HSPA+, as well as CDMA network technology. We offer leading-edge smartphones, tablets, mobile Internet keys, mobile Wi-Fi devices and machine- to-machine (M2M) devices Data and voice: Fast web browsing, social networking, messaging (text, picture and video), the latest mobile applications including OptikTM on the go, M2M connectivity, clear and reliable voice services, push-to-talk solutions including TELUS LinkTM service, and international roaming to more than 200 countries Wireline In British Columbia, Alberta and Eastern Quebec, TELUS is the established full-service local exchange carrier, offering a wide range of telecommunications products to consumers, including residential phone, Internet access, and television and entertainment services. Nationally, we provide telecommunications and IT solutions for small to large businesses, including IP, voice, video, data and managed solutions, as well as contact centre outsourcing solutions for domestic and international businesses. Voice: Reliable home phone service with long distance and Hosting, managed IT, security and cloud-based services: advanced calling features Comprehensive cybersecurity solutions and ongoing assured 1/2 INCH TRIMMED
    [Show full text]
  • Many Wireless Customers in Canada Underwhelmed by Network Reliability and Speed, J.D
    Many Wireless Customers in Canada Underwhelmed by Network Reliability and Speed, J.D. Power Finds Bell Mobility and TELUS Mobility Rank Highest in Ontario; Videotron Ranks Highest in Eastern Region; TELUS Mobility Ranks Highest in Western Region TORONTO: 22 April 2021 – Although the overall performance of Canada’s wireless networks remains flat year over year with an average of 9 PP100 (problems per 100 connections), a significant portion of customers say performance was not up to par, according to the J.D. Power 2021 Canada Wireless Network Quality Study,SM released today. Only 67% of wireless customers agree that their carrier’s network is reliable when streaming music and videos, activities that account for a significant amount of time used on devices. In addition, just 7% of customers say network speeds are faster than expected. “Despite massive investments in infrastructure and technology, customers remain relatively unimpressed by their carriers’ wireless networks,” said Adrian Chung, director of the technology, media & telecom practice at J.D. Power Canada. “Customers perceive the quality and performance of the wireless networks mainly as fair and meeting expectations. More specifically, network strength is associated with traditional functionality like calling and texting rather than browsing and streaming, presenting a clear reliability gap that carriers need to bridge.” This reliability gap should serve as a red flag for carriers, especially because browsing and streaming account for nearly half (49%) of the time that customers say they spend on their mobile phones. Following are additional key findings of the 2021 study: • Data hungry: The past year has seen an increased need to stay connected and more customers in Canada are beefing up their wireless plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Complaints by Service Provider
    Appendix A ‐ Complaints by Service Provider Complaints Change all % of Concluded Resolved Closed Resolved Closed Accepted Issued Accepted Rejected Accepted Y/Y % Provider Accepted and Concluded Complaints Pre‐Investigation Investigation Recommendation Decision #100 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1010100 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1010580 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1010620 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1010738 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1011295.com 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295.ca 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3Web 0.0% 0 ‐100.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 450Tel 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 768812 Ontario Inc. 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8COM 0.1% 8 ‐88.4% 10 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 A dimension humaine 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acanac Inc. 0.6% 64 ‐16.9% 64 37 1224 0 0 0 0 Access Communications Inc. 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Achatplus Inc. 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACN Canada 0.8% 82 9.3% 81 54 2 22 3 0 0 0 0 AEBC Internet Corporation 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AEI Internet 0.0% 3 ‐40.0% 5 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 AIC Global Communications 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Alberta High Speed 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Allstream Inc.
    [Show full text]