Boskalis September 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boskalis September 2015 BoskalisEQUITY September RESEARCH 2015 . Change in recommendation 11 September 2015 Boskalis Hold (previously Buy) Strong, but not immune Price (10/09/15) We downgrade our recommendation for Boskalis from Buy to HOLD and cut €44.70 our target price from €49.0 to €45.0. The key reason is that we believe too Target price (12-mth) €45.00 (previously €49.00) many people are taking the one-off positives for granted. We believe chances Forecast total return are high for the Dredging unit to soon start showing the underlying indicated 4.3% EBIT margins of 10-12%. In addition, the Offshore Energy unit has visibility until roughly 3Q16 but, with the current weak oil price, few new projects are Construction & Materials being started, while the stable order backlog represents new work from Netherlands Europe’s offshore wind market, which has a lower margin profile compared Bloomberg: BOKA NA Reuters: BOSN.AS with oil & gas work. Given the persistently low oil price, we believe Boskalis will be able to acquire cheap assets in the next few quarters but do not expect Share data any change in the Fugro situation. We do not materially change our 2015-16F Avg daily volume (3-mth) 436,503 operating income forecasts but slightly lower our target valuation metrics on Free float (%) 67.0 the core business units to 7.5x 2016F EV/EBITDA, or €34.39 per share, plus Market cap (€m) 5,466.6 Net debt (1F, €m) 300 €7.68 per share for tugboats and €2.84 per share for the Fugro stake. In our Enterprise value (1F, €m) 5,775 view, Boskalis will come out of this oil downturn stronger than before, but Dividend yield (1F, %) 3.6 things are likely to first get worse before they get better. Source: Company data, ING estimates 1H15 results were a clear beat versus our and consensus expectations, but due to Share price performance Suez Canal dynamics and project-specific characteristics, we increase our 2015F EPS 50 forecasts by 26%, aiming for 2015F net profit of €453m, which we consider well below 45 last year’s €490m. Boskalis guidance says the company “will not approach 2014 net profit 40 levels”. Our forecast includes a €32.4m positive incorporated in holding costs, related to 35 Fugro (€16.84; Hold; TP €18.0), and we have taken no view on Fugro in 2H15F (net profit 30 25 vulnerable to charges and impairments). For 2016F, we lower our net profit forecast by 20 3.6% to €327m, with our numbers excluding income from participations from the tugboat 9/10 9/11 9/12 9/13 9/14 9/15 business and the potential Fugro impact. Price AEX All Share (rebased) Given Boskalis’s excellent financial position and known buy-low, sell-high business Source: ING development approach, we expect the company to acquire cheap assets in the coming period if oil prices remain at the current low levels, causing distress at some too- leveraged oil services companies. Note that we do not expect a bid on Fugro in the short to medium term as Boskalis is supporting the current strategy and Fugro’s balance sheet distress has improved somewhat. In due time, we expect the rather late-cyclical Offshore business to also be negatively impacted by the low oil price environment. In our view, Boskalis’ robust financial position (1H15 leverage ratio: 0.7x) makes it a survivor in this downturn, from which it is likely to emerge stronger. Forecasts and ratios Year end Dec (€m) 2013 2014 2015F 2016F 2017F Revenues 3,635 3,178 3,051 2,859 2,826 Normalised EBITDA 800 889 765 615 583 Normalised net profit 366 490 453 327 309 Normalised EPS (€) 3.09 4.03 3.61 2.60 2.46 Normalised PER (x) 14.5 11.1 12.4 17.2 18.2 EV/normalised EBITDA (x) 7.6 6.7 7.5 9.4 9.9 FCF yield (%) 7.0 13.2 8.6 5.7 6.0 Tijs Hollestelle Dividend yield (%) 2.8 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Amsterdam +31 20 563 8789 Price/book (x) 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 [email protected] Normalised ROE (%) 16.5 17.3 13.6 9.1 8.3 Source: Company data, ING estimates research.ing.com SEE THE DISCLOSURES APPENDIX FOR IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & ANALYST CERTIFICATION1 Boskalis September 2015 New divisional forecasts Dredging We have encountered too Figure 1 shows our divisional revenue and operating income forecasts for the Dredging many investors who take division. Boskalis has consistently stated in the past few years that conditions in the one-off positives for granted Dredging market are stable and that new work entering the order book includes a pre- calculated EBIT margin of c.10-12%. Being a contractor, it points out that none of the contracts executed ever end at their pre-calculated margin – the margin is always above or below. Given that Boskalis’s operational execution track record is very good, we see the possibility of the margins reaching the high end of the range, or even 100bp above that. However, we have come across too many people who have started to take these very high operating margins for granted. We believe the likelihood of Boskalis reporting an EBIT margin in the range of 10-13% (let’s add a notch to company guidance) in the foreseeable future is high. Although one can never tell Our Dredging EBIT forecast for 2016F drops by c.€40m YoY. We note that Boskalis’s the exact chance of dredging 1H15 EBIT margin was 18.6%, reporting as much as €151.5m EBIT partly due to the margins reaching 10-12%, Suez Canal and generally high utilisation rates for the hoppers. Boskalis has indicated EBIT is high for 2016-17F that maintenance work has been delayed due to tight deadlines in Egypt, which means that ‘normal’ maintenance has been pushed into 2H15 (higher costs and lower fleet occupancy rates). Maintenance costs, especially for cutters, easily approach 15% of the contract value, hence the impact will be significant in 2H15F. That said, the Suez contract ended in 3Q15, and Boskalis is known to be a conservative – or, to use a better word, realistic – profit recogniser. • We believe the company continues to have positive claim settlements on contracts finished some time ago. However, the substantial contracts from the past are now all settled. For example, a 10% scope change or variation order on a €500m contract versus a similar percentage on a €100m contract. Operating margins in 2014 were impacted by claim settlement payments relating mainly to the Gorgon LNG project (Boskalis scope c.€1bn). • Currently, we do not have any visibility on any very large dredging contracts that are close to being awarded and/or started. The Fehmarn Belt project concerning the tunnel connection between Germany and Denmark is large (dredging, wet infra scope between €800m and €1bn) but has a limited impact on fleet utilisation rates. This project could be awarded at end-2015 or early-2016. That said, nobody talked about the Suez either at the beginning of 2014 and dredging projects, especially in emerging markets, could pop up out of nowhere. • The book-to-bill ratio hit 1.0x which, from a historical perspective, is still acceptable but not exceptionally high, and hence there is a chance of longer-term historical EBIT margins returning. Order book reached €1.72bn, down versus €2.01bn at end-2014. Fig 1 Boskalis: Dredging division (€m) 2013 2014 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F Revenue 1,725.5 1,664.8 1,648.1 1,598.7 1,598.7 1,614.7 Revenue growth (%) -3.5 -1.0 -3.0 0.0 1.0 EBITDA 352.0 484.4 355.2 315.0 308.2 307.2 EBITDA margin (%) 20.4 29.1 21.6 19.7 19.3 19.0 Depreciation 103.8 107.4 113.8 115.2 116.3 117.5 EBIT 248.2 377.1 241.4 199.8 191.8 189.7 EBIT margin (%) 14.4 22.7 14.7 12.5 12.0 11.8 Participations 6.9 3.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 EBIT incl participations 255.1 380.1 243.6 202.0 194.0 191.9 EBITDA incl participations 358.9 487.5 357.4 317.2 310.4 309.4 Source: Company data, ING estimates 2 Boskalis September 2015 Offshore Energy Dockwise is late-cyclical and The Offshore Energy division also performed strongly during the first half of 2015. Even currently brings large though some activities have been affected by the low oil price environment, the key modules from Asian vessels of heavy marine transporter Dockwise are still very busy. Dockwise is executing shipyards to LNG sites in the Wheatstone LNG transport contract, bringing the finalised oil platforms and modules Australia, but is likely to see from Asian shipyards to LNG sites in Australia. We note that these contracts relate to lower activity in 2016-17F expansion capex of the oil & gas industry from several years ago. This type of work has visibility well into 2016, but Boskalis is frank about the fact that it currently does not see much tender activity for new large transport contracts. Boskalis also stated that, for instance, its subsea business in the Nord Sea is impacted by the low oil price environment (more equipment from the Northern part of the Nord Sea steaming in the Southern part of the Nord Sea, looking for work). Boskalis’s Offshore Energy division comprises a wide array of activities.
Recommended publications
  • Abn Amro Bank Nv
    7 MAY 2020 ABN AMRO ABN AMRO BANK N.V. REGISTRATION DOCUMENT constituting part of any base prospectus of the Issuer consisting of separate documents within the meaning of Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 (the "Prospectus Regulation") 250249-4-270-v18.0 55-40738204 CONTENTS Page 1. RISK FACTORS ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 26 3. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ......................................................................... 28 4. SELECTED DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................ 30 5. PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION ......................................................................... 35 6. THE ISSUER ......................................................................................................................................... 36 1.1 History and recent developments ............................................................................................. 36 1.2 Business description ................................................................................................................ 37 1.3 Regulation ............................................................................................................................... 40 1.4 Legal and arbitration proceedings ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CFD Type IB Symbol Product Description Symbol Currency Share
    Netherlands CFD Type IB Symbol Product Description Symbol Currency Share AALB Aalberts Industries NV AALB EUR Share AO1 Accell Group AO1 EUR Share AGN Aegon NV AGN EUR Share AKZ Akzo Nobel NV AKZ EUR Share AMG AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group NV AMG EUR Share ARCAD Arcadis NV ARCAD EUR Share ASM ASM International NV ASM EUR Share ASML ASML Holding NV ASML EUR Share BESI BE Semiconductor Industries NV BESI EUR Share BINCK BinckBank NV BINCK EUR Share BRNL Brunel International BRNL EUR Share COR Corio NV COR EUR Share CSM CSM CSM EUR Share DL Delta Lloyd NV DL EUR Share ECMPA Eurocommercial Properties NV ECMPA EUR Share ENX Euronext NV ENX EUR Share EXACT Exact Holding NV EXACT EUR Share FUGR Fugro NV FUGR EUR Share GTO Gemalto NV GTO EUR Share GRONT Grontmij GRONT EUR Share HEIJM Heijmans NV HEIJM EUR Share HEHN Heineken Holding NV HEHN EUR Share HEI Heineken NV HEI EUR Share IMCD IMCD GROUP NV - W/I IMCD EUR Share IM Imtech NV IM EUR Share ING ING Groep NV ING EUR Share AH Koninklijke Ahold NV AH EUR Share BAM Koninklijke BAM Groep NV BAM EUR Share BOKA Koninklijke Boskalis Westminster NV BOKA EUR Share DSM Koninklijke DSM NV DSM EUR Share KPN Koninklijke KPN NV KPN EUR Share PHI Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV PHI EUR Share KTC Koninklijke Ten Cate NV KTC EUR Share VPK Koninklijke Vopak NV VPK EUR Share WES Koninklijke Wessanen NV WES EUR Index IBNL25 Netherlands 25 IBNL25 EUR Share NWRP New World Resources PLC NWRP CZK Share NWR New World Resources PLC NWR GBP Share NISTI Nieuwe Steen Investments NV NISTI EUR Share NN NN Group NV
    [Show full text]
  • Remuneration Report 2017 Report Remuneration 2017
    REMUNERATION REMUNERATION REPORT 2017 REPORT 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS REMUNERATION REPORT 2017 — BOSKALIS REPORT 2017 REMUNERATION 2 3 INTRODUCTION 5 REMUNERATION POLICY FOR THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT 7 APPLICATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2017 9 SUPERVISORY BOARD REMUNERATION POLICY REMUNERATION REPORT 2017 — BOSKALIS REPORT 2017 REMUNERATION 3 INTRODUCTION MEMBERS OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE In 2017 the Remuneration Committee consisted of two members, with Mr. Van Woudenberg as chairman and It is the role of the Remuneration Committee to advise the Mr. Niggebrugge as a member. On 10 May 2017 Supervisory Board on: Mr. Niggebrugge stepped down as member of the the submission of a clear and understandable proposal Remuneration Committee and was succeeded by concerning the remuneration policy to be pursued for Mr. Van der Veer. members of the Board of Management with focus on long-term value creation for the company and the business The Remuneration Committee regularly avails itself of the connected with it and taking into account the internal pay services of an independent remuneration adviser and has ratios within the company. The Remuneration Committee ascertained that this remuneration adviser does not provide shall consider and include all matters required by law and advice to the members of the Board of Management. the Corporate Governance Code 2016 (the “Code”). The Supervisory Board shall present the policy to the General REMUNERATION REPORT 2017 — BOSKALIS REPORT 2017 REMUNERATION Meeting of Shareholders for adoption; 4 the submission of a proposal concerning the remuneration REVISION OF THE LABOR MARKET REFERENCE of individual members of the Board of Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Reporting As a Driver for Integrated Thinking?
    Integrated Reporting as a driver for Integrated Thinking? Maturity of <IR> in the Netherlands 2015 Contributors Patrick Seinstra Jennifer Muller Royal BAM Group: Barry Oesman Partner Integrated & Sustainability Deloitte Audit Master Student at London School of Economics and Group Controller Political Science Anneke Sipkens DSM: Kimberley Chan Director Sustainability Deloitte Risk Services Michiel van der Valk Sustainability Manager Master Student Sustainable Business & Innovation at Udeke Huiskamp Utrecht University Nutreco: Jose Villalon Senior Manager Sustainability Deloitte Risk Services Corporate Sustainability Director CSR the Netherlands (MVO Nederland) Erica Kostense-Smit Willem Lageweg Nutreco: Sigrid van Amerongen Manager Sustainability Deloitte Risk Services CEO CSR The Netherlands (MVO Nederland) CSR Manager Ashley Myers Vincent van Marle Heineken International: Jan-Willem Vosmeer Manager Sustainability Deloitte Risk Services Manager CSR Manager Frank Geelen Interviewees Delta Lloyd: David Hoppe Partner CFO Services & Finance Transformation NS: Carola Wijdoogen Communications Advisor Deloitte Consulting Director Sustainable Business Ministry of Economic Affairs: Martin Lok Marco van der Vegte KPN: Hans Koeleman Program Manager Natural Capital Managing Partner Audit and Member Executive Board Director Corporate Communications & CSR Deloitte Holding Avans Hogeschool: Marleen Janssen Groesbeek KPN: Brechtje Spoorenberg Professor Sustainable Finance and Accounting Olivier van Thuijl Manager CSR Senior Manager CFO Services Deloitte
    [Show full text]
  • Remuneration Policy Supervisory Board
    Signify N.V. Remuneration Policy Supervisory Board 1 Introduction The total remuneration of members of the Supervisory Board is targeted around the median The objective of the remuneration policy of the level of a representative labor market peer group and Supervisory Board is to support long-term value benchmarked periodically. This peer group is the same creation of the company. The following principles apply as used for benchmarking the remuneration of the for this remuneration policy: Board of Management. The peer group consists of 50% • The remuneration policy aims to attract, reward and Dutch headquartered cross-industry companies that are retain qualified Supervisory Board members, together included in the AEX or AMX, and 50% European sector forming a diverse and balanced Supervisory Board specific companies. For use for the remuneration of the with the appropriate level of skills, competences and Chairman of Supervisory Board, peer group companies experience for overseeing the (execution of the) having a one-tier board structure are excluded. Company’s strategy and performance, whilst taking the interest of all the company’s stakeholders into As of January 2020, the labor market peer group account. consists of the following 14 companies: • Given the nature of the responsibilities of the Supervisory Board as an independent body, the Signify labor market peer group remuneration is not dependent on the performance Aalberts DSM Prysmian Group of the company and therefore consists of fixed AkzoNobel KPN Rexel components only. ASML Legrand Rheinmetall Group • The remuneration reflects the time spent and BAM Nexans Siemens Gamesa responsibilities of each individual member of the Boskalis Osram Supervisory Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcadis N.V. Remuneration Policy Supervisory Board
    ARCADIS N.V. REMUNERATION POLICY SUPERVISORY BOARD Objectives The remuneration policy for members of the Supervisory Board of Arcadis N.V. (‘Arcadis’ or the ‘Company’) should serve to attract, motivate and retain diverse Supervisory Board members of the highest caliber in order to support and oversee the execution of our ambitious business strategy. Remuneration elements The remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board consists of a fixed fee and an attendance fee. Given the nature of the responsibilities of the Supervisory Board, the remuneration is not tied to the performance of the Company and therefore includes fixed compensation only. In line with the Dutch corporate governance code, the members of the Supervisory Board will not be rewarded in equity-based compensation. Labor market reference The annual remuneration levels for the Supervisory Board are based on a benchmark analysis against the median of the following 16 Dutch headquartered companies with significant international activities. Dutch headquartered companies with significant international activities1 Randstad (NL) SBM Offshore (NL) AkzoNobel (NL) Aalberts Industries (NL) DSM (NL) Fugro (NL) BAM (NL) Refresco (NL) KPN (NL) Vopak (NL) Wolters Kluwer (NL) TKH Group (NL) PostNL (NL) Brunel (NL) Boskalis (NL) TomTom (NL) Total compensation The following fixed annual fees are applicable: ASC/RemCo Supervisory (combined Board AARC membership) Chairperson € 85,000 € 12,000 € 10,0002 Member € 58,000 € 8,000 € 7,000 AARC = Arcadis Audit and Risk Committee ASC = Arcadis Selection Committee RemCo = Remuneration Committee Attendance fee The following attendance fees are applicable for members of the Supervisory Board: • € 2,500 for every visit for meetings that take place outside of the Supervisory Board member’s country of domicile and does not involve intercontinental travel; or • € 4,000 for every visit for meetings that involve intercontinental travel; and • No attendance fee is paid if the meeting takes place in the Supervisory Board’s member’s country of domicile.
    [Show full text]
  • Remuneration Report 2016 Remuneration 016 2 Report
    REMUNERATION REPORT REMUNERATION REPORT 2016 2 016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS REMUNERATION REPORT 2016 — BOSKALIS REMUNERATION 2 3 INTRODUCTION 5 REMUNERATION POLICY FOR THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT 7 APPLICATION OF REMUNERATION POLICY IN 2016 9 SUPERVISORY BOARD REMUNERATION POLICY REMUNERATION REPORT 2016 — BOSKALIS REMUNERATION 3 INTRODUCTION MEMBERS OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE The Remuneration Committee consists of two members, with Mr. Van Woudenberg as chairman and Mr. Niggebrugge as The Remuneration Committee performs the following duties: a member. Putting forward a proposal to the Supervisory Board with regard to the remuneration policy to be pursued for the The Remuneration Committee regularly avails itself of the Board of Management. The policy is submitted for services of an independent remuneration adviser and has approval to the General Meeting of Shareholders. ascertained that this remuneration adviser does not provide Investigating whether the adopted remuneration policy is advice to the members of the Board of Management. still up-to-date and proposing policy adjustments where necessary. Putting forward proposals to the Supervisory Board with regard to the remuneration of individual members of the Board of Management (this in accordance with the remuneration policy adopted by the General Meeting of Shareholders). Compiling the remuneration report on the remuneration policy pursued, subject to adoption by the Supervisory REMUNERATION REPORT 2016 — BOSKALIS REMUNERATION Board. 4 ACTIVITIES DURING 2016 financial position of PGB. Future indexation will be The Remuneration Committee met twice during 2016, financed by PGB pension fund only. with both members having attended each of the meetings. The Committee also held regular consultations outside these To compensate for the change from unconditional to meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Remuneration Fact Sheet
    ING’s Remuneration Policy What? When? ING needs to attract and retain excellent leaders so that it can deliver on its promise to its Changes to ING’s Executive Board 34 million clients in the more than 40 countries it is operating in. At the same time, ING has Remuneration are eective as of to balance the interests of all stakeholders. The Supervisory Board reconfirms its support of 1 Jan 2016. ING´s Executive Board Remuneration Policy aimed at further reducing the gap between the total direct compensation of ING’s Executive Board and the median of the EURO STOXX 50 peer group over time. Why? For 2016, the Supervisory Board decided to increase the total (at target) remuneration of Executive Board members by 2%. Including these changes, ING will still pay its Executive To remain competitive, ING needs to attract Board well below the median for national and international companies in its peer group and retain the best leaders with international (the EURO STOXX 50). experience for its global activities. The Supervisory Board will continue to annually For more information see the remuneration page or the full Annual Report on www.ing.com. monitor developments and the applicable benchmark (EURO STOXX 50). Where? How does ING compare to other companies? ING is a European bank with a global presence. It has over 54,000 employees serving 34 million ING’s total remuneration for its CEO is far below the median (see graph). Also, its CFO and CRO customers across 40 countries. At least 70% of employees work outside of the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2010 Scope of Report
    Corporate SoCial reSponSibility report 2010 Scope of report Activity Entity Financial Value chain Society Safety Employees Environment Corporate Boskalis Dredging & Earthmoving Harbour Towage SMIT Salvage, Transport & Heavy Lift Terminal Services Lamnalco Maritime Infrastructure Archirodon Sustainable and responsible business practice is shareholding) and the extent to which we are able to an integral part of the way in which we operate. In influence the company’s CSR policy. our Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) report we account for our economic, social and environmental Structure of this report performance in accordance with the international • The section ‘Who we are’ includes our profile guidelines set out in the Global Reporting Initiative and a summary of our financial performance. (version G3). Our first CSR report was published in For a detailed explanation please refer to our 2009. This year we have broadened the scope in line financial annual report, which can also be found with our ambitions. on our website. • The ‘Value chain’ section has been expanded Besides the activity Dredging & Earthmoving, to compared to 2009 to incorporate the activities which our scope was limited last year, this report of SMIT and Lamnalco. also includes the activities of our 50%-owned • The economic and ecological impact of our associate company Lamnalco (Terminal Services). activities on the community is covered in the ‘Society’ section, which also includes This year our attention has been strongly focused on an account of how we displayed our social preparing for the integration of the SMIT activities. commitment during 2010. With the foundations for this integration having • ‘Safety’ is a prominent aspect of our social been laid in 2010, implementation will commence performance, forming an integral part of our in the year ahead when processes and systems will activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 — Boskalis
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 — BOSKALIS ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL ANNUAL REPORT 2018 REPORT 2018 KEY FIGURES (in EUR million, unless stated otherwise) 2018 2017 Revenue 2,570 2,343 Order book 4,292 3,495 EBITDA 353.6* 436.6 Net result from joint ventures and associates 28.4* 31.0 Depreciation and amortization 234.6 251.6 Operating result 119.0* 185.0 Extraordinary charges 519.5 0.0 EBIT -400.5 185.0 Net profit adjusted for extraordinary charges after tax 82.8 150.5 Net profit (loss) -435.9 150.5 Net group profit (loss) -433.7 150.4 Cash flow 319.5* 402.0 Shareholders’ equity 2,544 3,023 RATIOS (IN PERCENTAGES) EBIT as % of revenue 4.6* 7.9 Return on capital employed 2.9* 4.8 Return on equity 3.0* 4.9 Solvency 56.1 62.6 S S RE FIGURES PER SHARE (IN EUR) RE U U G Profit 0.63* 1.15 I G I F F Dividend 0.50 1.00 Y Y E E Cash flow 2.41* 3.07 K NON-FINANCIAL INDICATORS Employees including associated companies 11,345 10,732 Employees in Boskalis majority owned entities 5,912 5,772 Ratio women/men within Boskalis’ majority owned entities 12/88 10/90 Number of nationalities within Boskalis’ majority owned entities 68 64 Lost Time Injuries (LTI) 10 9 Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) 0.05 0.06 Total Recordable Injury Rate (TRIR) 0.40 0.55 Strategic suppliers: percentage spend covered by Supplier Code of Conduct 70 81 CO2 emissions scope 1+2 (MT (‘000)) 1,180 1,223 Please refer to the glossary for definitions of the terms used S I * Excluding extraordinary charges L A SK BO – 8 1 0 7 RT 2 O EP LAG 201 R S VER UAL R NN JAA A REVENUE (in EUR million) NET PROFIT (in
    [Show full text]
  • ABN AMRO Bank N.V
    ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Annual Report 2019 Introduction Table of contents Introduction Strategy and performance Strategy and performance 2 5 39 137 Risk, funding & capital Introduction Strategy and Risk, funding & Leadership & performance capital governance Risk, funding & capital About this report 2 Economic environment 6 Introduction to Risk, Introduction to Leadership Key figures and profile 3 Regulatory environment 9 funding & & governance 138 ABN AMRO shares 4 Strategy 11 capital management 40 Executive Board and Bank performance 15 Risk, funding & Executive Committee 138 Business performance 23 capital management 41 Supervisory Board 142 Responsibility statement 38 Risk, funding & Report of the capital review 72 Supervisory Board 146 Additional risk, funding General Meeting and Leadership & capital disclosures 129 shareholder structure 154 Codes and regulations 157 Leadership & governance Legal structure 159 Remuneration report 160 Governance 171 281 Annual Financial Statements 2019 Annual Financial Statements 2019 Other Consolidated Annual Financial Statements 2019 172 Independent Annual Financial Statements Notes to the Consolidated Annual Financial Statements 179 auditor’s report 282 Company Financial Statements of ABN AMRO Bank N.V. 263 Other information 290 Notes to the Company Financial Statements Cautionary statements 292 of ABN AMRO Bank N.V. 267 Enquiries 293 Other Other ABN AMRO Bank Annual Report 2019 Introduction About this report Introduction / About this report 2 Introduction About this report Introduction Value- creating Welcome to ABN AMRO’s 2019 Annual Report topics Strategy and performance Strategy and performance ABN AMRO takes a ‘core and more’ approach to Impact Annual reporting. The Integrated Annual Review (IAR) is Report Report the ‘core’ report that explains how, over time, Overview Integrated Non- of total Annual financial data & our bank creates value for its stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • ING Investment Universe for Asset Management Basismaterialen Air
    ING Investment Universe for Asset Management Listed shares for Dutch Clients as at 31 December 2019 Air Liquide AkzoNobel Albemarle ArcelorMittal BASF BHP Group CRH Dow DSM DuPont de Nemours Ecolab Basismaterialen Franco-Nevada Glencore Johnson Matthey LafargeHolcim Linde Novozymes Nucor Nutrien Rio Tinto Stora Enso ThyssenKrupp Umicore Alphabet AT&T BT Group China Mobile Comcast Deutsche Telekom Electronic Arts Facebook KPN Communicatiediensten Liberty Global C Netflix Omnicom Group Orange Swisscom Telefonica Telenor Telstra Tencent Verizon Vodafone Group Walt Disney WPP Ahold Delhaize Anheuser-Busch InBev Carrefour Coca-Cola Colgate-Palmolive Danone Diageo Estee Lauder Companies Heineken Henkel Kraft Heinz Company Dagelijkse L'Oreal consumentengoederen METRO Mondelez International Nestle PepsiCo Pernod-Ricard Procter & Gamble Reckitt Benckiser Group Tesco Unilever Walgreens Boots Alliance Wal-Mart Stores WM Morrison Supermarkets Accor Adidas Alibaba Group Holding Amazon.com BMW Booking Holdings CECONOMY Continental Duurzame Daimler consumentengoederen EssilorLuxottica Ford Motor Garmin Hennes & Mauritz Home Depot Inditex Intercontinental Hotels Group Kingfisher Lowe's Companies LVMH Marks & Spencer Group McDonald's Nike Peugeot Prosus Richemont Sodexo Starbucks Swatch Group Target Tesla Motors Toyota Motor YUM! Brands Baker Hughes BP Chevron ENI EOG Resources Equinor ExxonMobil Marathon Petroleum National Oilwell Varco Energie Occidental Petroleum Philips 66 Repsol Royal Dutch Shell SBM Offshore Schlumberger TechnipFMC Total Valero Energy
    [Show full text]