DOCSLIB.ORG

For the City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For the City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility Project Prepared for: City of Commerce City of Commerce Transportation Department (CEQA Lead Agency) Claude McFerguson, Director of Transportation 5555 Jillson Street Commerce, CA 90040 Telephone: 323-887-4419 Prepared by: UltraSystems Environmental Inc. 16431 Scientific Way Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Telephone: 949-788-4900 FAX: 949-788-4901 www.ultrasystems.com May 2021 This page left intentionally blank ❖ PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET ❖ PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 1. Project Title City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility (TMF) 2. CEQA Lead Agency and Address City of Commerce Transportation Department 5555 Jillson Street Commerce, CA 90040 3. Responsible Agency City of Commerce Transportation Department 5555 Jillson Street Commerce, CA 90040 4. Contact and Phone Number Claude McFerguson, Director of Transportation (328) 887-4419 ext. 2235 [email protected] 5. Project Applicant City of Commerce Transportation Department 5555 Jillson Street Commerce, CA 90040 6. Project Location Permanent TMF Site: 5926 Sheila Street Commerce, CA 90040 Temporary TMF Site: 5733 Sheila Street Commerce, CA 90040 7. Assessor’s Parcel Numbers Permanent TMF Site: APNs 6334-025-911 and -912 Temporary TMF Site: APNs 6334-006-900 and -901 8. Project Site General Plan Permanent TMF Site: Designation(s) Heavy Industrial Temporary TMF Site: Commercial Manufacturing 9. Project Site Zoning Designation(s) Permanent TMF Site: Public Facility (PF) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Temporary TMF Site: Commercial Manufacturing (C1) 7072/City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility Project Page i Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2021 ❖ PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET ❖ 10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Permanent TMF Site: Land uses surrounding the project site include commercial, residential and Heavy Industrial. Mixed commercial and industrial land uses are located to the north. Heavy industrial land uses are located to the east and west. To the south is a railroad. Temporary TMF Site: To the south are industrial land uses opposite Sheila Street; a church and commercial use to the west opposite Senta Avenue; industrial uses to the north opposite Washington Boulevard; and commercial use to the east opposite Elkgrove Avenue. 11. Description of Project The City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility (TMF) project proposes the demolition of existing structures and construction of a new maintenance facility. The proposed permanent TMF would be located on an approximately 6.51-acre site at 5926 Sheila Street, in the downtown area of the City of Commerce, CA, and has been previously developed. The permanent TMF site borders other commercial and industrial land uses. The proposed permanent TMF would consist of an approximately 16,500 square-foot maintenance building and a 20,000 square-foot office/warehouse building. The proposed project would also include surface parking, a paved area for fleet vehicles, and landscaping. The proposed temporary TMF would be located on a 2.65-acre site at 5733 Sheila Street, approximately 670 feet north of the proposed project site. Existing maintenance buildings on the site would be demolished. The temporary TMF would consist of portable buildings and cargo containers that would be removed after the proposed permanent TMF opens. 12. Selected Agencies whose Approval South Coast Air Quality Management District is Required (permit to construct) 13. Have California Native American Letters were sent by the City of Commerce tribes traditionally and culturally Transportation Department (the Lead Agency) to 7072/City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility Project Page ii Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2021 ❖ PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET ❖ affiliated with the project area local Native American tribes asking if they wished requested consultation pursuant to to participate in AB 52 consultation concerning the Public Resources Code proposed. The letters were sent on December 15, § 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation 2020 by certified mail. begun? 14. Other Public Agencies whose City of Commerce Building & Safety Division Approval is Required City of Commerce Fire Department City of Commerce Public Works Department 7072/City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility Project Page iii Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2021 ❖ TABLE OF CONTENTS ❖ TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Information Sheet ................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ viii 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Proposed Project .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Lead Agencies – Environmental Review Implementation .................................................. 1-1 CEQA Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Purpose of Initial Study ..................................................................................................................... 1-2 Review and Comment by Other Agencies .................................................................................. 1-3 Impact Terminology ........................................................................................................................... 1-4 Organization of Initial Study ........................................................................................................... 1-4 Findings from the Initial Study ....................................................................................................... 1-5 2.0 Environmental Setting ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 Project Location .................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Project Setting ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Existing Characteristics of the Site .............................................................................................2-10 3.0 Project Description ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 Existing Transit System ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 Project Overview .................................................................................................................................. 3-2 Project Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 3-2 Existing Transit Maintenance Facility ......................................................................................... 3-4 Temporary Transit Maintenance Facility .................................................................................. 3-4 Permanent Transit Maintenance Facility ................................................................................... 3-4 Project Phasing ..................................................................................................................................... 3-9 Construction Details .........................................................................................................................3-11 Discretionary Actions .......................................................................................................................3-13 4.0 Environmental Checklist .................................................................................................................. 4-1 Aesthetics .............................................................................................................................................4.1-1 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .........................................................................................4.2-1 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................4.3-1 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................................4.4-1 Cultural Resources ...........................................................................................................................4.5-1 Energy ....................................................................................................................................................4.6-1 Geology and Soils ..............................................................................................................................4.7-1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...........................................................................................................4.8-1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metrolink Partners with Make-A-Wish® to Grant Young Boy's Wish
    DECEMBER | JANUARY 2013-14 METROLINK PARTNERS WITH MAKE-A-WISH® TO GRANT YOUNG BOY’s WISH DISNEY ON ICE MAKE-A-WISH COVER STORY WINTER WONDERLAND PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPAIGN GRANT SHUTTLE TO DUCKS WORD FROM THE CEO PCA CARD APPLICATIONS ROSE PARADE & ROSE BOWL HOLIDAY SERVICE ALERT KINGS & CLIPPERS DISCOUNT INSIDE 2 SUSTAINABILITY GRANT 3 4 HOLIDAY TOY EXPRESS 5 LUNAR NEW YEAR 6 PARKING AT LAGUNA NIGUEL/MISSION VIEJO PHOTO CONTEST MONTEBELLO/COMMERCE NOTICE SPY: THE SECRET WORLD OF ESPIONAGE LION KING DISCOUNT metrolinktrains.com 800-371-5465 (LINK) 2 WORD FROM THE CEO METROLINK RECEIVES KEY As the year comes to an end, I want to take a moment to reflect on the accomplishments Metrolink has made in 2013. When I became GRANT FOR CEO, I made a promise to improve customer relations, strengthen our SUSTAINABILITY security efforts and put my best foot forward to continue Metrolink’s track record of leading the nation in implementing technological innova- tions such as Positive Train Control and Crash Energy Management. Earlier this year, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) granted Metrolink CUSTOMER SERVICE We introduced the Customer Connect initiative $34.66 million in Carl Moyer Program funds to in March, giving you the opportunity to ask questions and voice your help support Metrolink’s purchase of 17 Tier 4 concerns to Metrolink representatives at L.A. Union Station every locomotives. An additional $17 million, essential for week. In August, we held the first of many meetings to come with our the purchase of three additional locomotives, was Rider Advisory Group, giving riders a forum to provide feedback about contingent upon the state legislature’s extension of how we can improve our service and resolve issues pertinent to them and their fellow riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2019-20 Proposed Budget
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROPOSED BUDGET Including Forecast for FY2020-21 thru FY2023-24 For Board Consideration & Public Comment Final Adopted Budget will be available 60 days after Board Adoption Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Orange County Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Ventura County Transportation Commission June 28, 2019 1 This page intentionally left blank June 28, 2019 2 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FY2019-20 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Executive Summary ....................................................................... 11 1.1 A Message from the Chief Executive Officer – To be added ............ 11 1.2 Introduction – To be added .............................................................. 11 1.3 Metrolink in Perspective – To be added ........................................... 11 1.4 Metrolink in Comparison – To be added .......................................... 11 1.5 Accomplishments in FY2018-19 – To be added ............................... 11 1.6 Objectives for FY2019-20 ................................................................ 11 1.7 FY2019-20 Budget in Brief ............................................................... 12 1.8 Key FY2019-20Budget Information .................................................. 12 1.9 The FY2019-20 Operational Budget Statistics ................................. 13 1.10 Administrative Requirements ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SCRRA Strategic Assessment
    SCRRA Strategic Assessment Southern California Regional Rail Authority January 26, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ES Page 1 1.0 Study Purpose and Methodology 1.1 1.1 Purpose 1.1 1.2 Methodology 1.1 1.2.1 The Current Metrolink System and the Surrounding Environment 1.1 1.2.2 Definition of Future Operating Scenarios 1.2 1.2.3 Identification of Long- Term Direction 1.4 1.2.4 Challenges 1.4 2.0 Current System and Baseline Capacity 2.1 2.1 Formation of Metrolink 2.1 2.2 Current Operations 2.2 2.3 Person Throughput on Metrolink Compared with Freeways 2.4 2.4 Organizational Summary 2.5 2.5 Mission Statement and Management Philosophy 2.5 2.6 The SCRRA Budget 2.7 2.7 SCRRA Operating Formulae 2.7 2.8 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats, and Unknown Outcomes 2.9 2.9 Constraints on System Growth 2.10 3.0 Metrolink System Safety Program 3.1 3.1 System Safety Program Plan 3.1 3.2 Sealed Corridor Concept 3.2 3.3 Grade Separations 3.5 3.4 Crash Energy Management 3.5 4.0 Public Communications 4.1 4.1 Methods for Determining Customer Communications Needs 4.1 4.1.1 Onboard Surveys 4.1 4.1.2 Rider Panel 4.1 4.1.3 Focus Groups 4.1 4.1.4 Customer Comments 4.1 4.1.5 Industry-wide Research Studies 4.2 4.1.6 Stakeholder Communications 4.2 4.2 Preferences and Expectations for Transit Information 4.2 4.2.1 Printed Materials 4.2 4.2.2 Call Center 4.3 4.2.3 Website 4.3 4.2.4 Station Signage 4.5 a) Static Signage 4.5 b) Dynamic Signage 4.6 4.2.5 In-vehicle information 4.7 4.2.6 Media Relations 4.7 4.3 Short Term Communications Outlook (2006-2015)
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Simulation Findings Technical Appendix November 2011
    Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Regional Rail Simulation Findings Technical Appendix November 2011 1 This report was authored by Dr. Robert C. Leachman, who is solely responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the contents. Dr. Maged M. Dessouky of Leachman and Associates LLC was a key technical contributor to the simulation modeling and analysis reported in sections 6 and 7. This study benefited from data, comments and suggestions supplied by Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Metrolink. However, the conclusions and evaluations expressed herein are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of the railroads or of any governmental agency. Funding: The preparation of this report was funded in part by grants from the United States Department of Transportation (DOT). Note: The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG, DOT or any organization contributing data in support of the study. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. 2 Table of Contents 1. The Main Line Rail Network .................................................................................................6 BNSF Overview .........................................................................................................................7 Track Configuration .................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum – Multimodal Review Wbs Task Id: 165.10.05-010
    FINAL REPORT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM – MULTIMODAL REVIEW WBS TASK ID: 165.10.05-010 Prepared for Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority March 4, 2009 2020 East First Street, Suite 400 Santa Ana, California 92705 Identification: 165.10.05-010 I-710 EIR/EIS Corridor Project Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of the I-710 Corridor Project Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (I-710 Corridor Project)........................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of This Report........................................................................................................ 2 2.0 EXISTING MULTIMODAL SYSTEMS.................................................................................. 3 2.1 Rail Transit .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Metro ...............................................................................................................................3 2.1.2 Metrolink..........................................................................................................................4 2.1.3 Amtrak .............................................................................................................................4 2.1.4 Orangeline.......................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • October / November 2013 Metrolink Matters
    OCTOBER | NOVEMBER 2013 FOOTBALL SEASON L.A. UNION STATION FARE ENFORCEMENT CORONA GRADE SEPARATION SOLAR DECATHLON WORD FROM THE CEO BREEDERS’ CUP CITY OF COMMERCE SHUTTLE SAFETY IS SMART LA AND OC AUTO SHOWS INSIDE 2 SAVE MORE WITH CPP 3 4 5 6 L.A. KINGS DISCOUNT AMTRAK BIKE POLICY REMINDER NOTICE TO SB LINE RIDERS SAN CLEMENTE SEAFEST DESTINATION VIDEOS HOW MANY? THE AMOUNT OF CO2 THE NUMBER OF THE NUMBER OF METROLINK RIDERS PEOPLE WHO CHOOSE METROLINK RUNS HOT DOGS THAT PREVENT FROM BEING TO RIDE METROLINK ITS TRAINS COULD FIT IN A RELEASED INTO THE EACH YEAR INSTEAD OF 11,200 MILES METROLINK CAR: ATMOSPHERE EACH YEAR DRIVING IS EQUAL TO: PER DAY 3,094,971 IS EQUAL TO PLANTING (EQUAL TO 2 122 SOLD-OUT ROUND-TRIPS HOT DOGS 2 MILLION NFL FOOTBALL BETWEEN L.A. & NYC) TREES STADIUMS The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), one of five member agencies that funds EMF EXPANSION INCREASES Metrolink service, completed the expansion of Metrolink’s Eastern Maintenance Facility (EMF) in METROLINK’S OVERNIGHT September. The facility is expected to be operational in early 2014. The yearlong $10.3 million TRAIN STORAGE AND construction project increased the overnight storage and maintenance capability of the Colton MAINTENANCE CAPABILITIES facility from five train consists* to 15. The EMF will also allow Metrolink to move a portion of its maintenance operations performed at its Central Maintenance Facility near downtown Los Angeles. continued on page 2 metrolinktrains.com 800-371-5465 (LINK) 2 WORD FROM THE CEO SAVE MORE CASH WHEN YOUR EMPLOYER JOINS Metrolink recognizes that outstanding on-time performance is critical to providing you with an METROLINK’S CPP excellent customer experience.
    [Show full text]
  • California Rail Passenger Program Report 1993/94 - 2002/03
    .... ..__ ··•· .. -· ...,._ -- California Rail Passenger Program Report I 1993/94 - 2002/03 - -········-~=,~ ·~ ~~-2:: ==~.;::;;;;::;.~____.........,._.._==~--=·,..,. .·•· ·.· ;~---. • ...•. ·:·.• . ..-' ...,~ ' ' ·.:.;,_• ·~· , . ,, _ State of California ·· · · .. · Department of Transportation !Ji' . December 1993 fim""""n~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY J>ETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001 (916) 654-5267 FAX (916) 654-6608 TDD (916) 654-4014 March 1, 1994 Members, California Legislature State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Members: This transmits the California Rail Passenger Program Report 1993/94 - 2002/03. Section 14036 of the Government Code requires the Department to produce a five-year Rail Passenger Development Plan every other year. Caltrans is producing this ten-year California Rail Passenger Program Report, which includes all of the information required by Section 14036 for the five-year plan, in order to provide an extended planning horizon for rail passenger service in California. The Report examines passenger rail transportation in California. The Report reviews the current operations of State-supported intercity rail passenger service and outlines the Department's ten-year plan for intercity service for the period 1993/94 through 2002/03 for capital improvements and service expansions. Also, for the first time the State's rail report includes a summary of current operations and expansion programs for all forms of passenger rail: intercity, commuter and urban. Chapter V - The State Intercity Rail Capital Program displays a ten-year program of capital improvement projects to upgrade and expand the three State-supported intercity routes. The program totals $1.2 billion, of which 77 percent has identified funding sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Business Plan
    STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN ADOPTED January 22, 2021 A Message from the CEO operating practices that put our customers’ safety first and securing the communications spectrum we needed to ensure the long-term viability of our Positive Train Control safety system. We continued to advance our zero emissions future by retiring our last Tier 0 locomotive, adding more Tier 4 locomotives to our fleet, and adopting a Recovery Plan Framework that focuses on the triple bottom line: environment, economy and equity. And we reduced operating costs through better efficiencies This Plan is being published as vaccines against the coronavirus make their way from the lab to the people – one reason for which we look to the future with renewed hope. The Plan laid out on the following pages represents our vision for a Metrolink that is customer focused first and foremost. A Metrolink whose commitment to its Stephanie Wiggins foundational value --- safety – is stronger than ever. And CEO, Metrolink a Metrolink that is poised to nimbly respond to new challenges, to innovate as technology permeates more When I took the helm at Metrolink as its CEO, I of our business, and to continuously modernize business knew it was an important transportation service that practices that create value and exceed expectations. reduces congestion in one of the country’s most The Plan recognizes the creativity and resourcefulness sizable megaregions, which contributes to air quality of our team as we piloted new ideas like the 5-Day improvements in support of local, regional and state Flex Pass for telecommuters and our Kids Ride Free goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Lossan Station Information Swat Team Assessment
    LOSSAN TAC February 9, 2012, Agenda Item 5 LOSSAN STATION INFORMATION SWAT TEAM ASSESSMENT DRAFT FEBRUARY 2012 1 | Page LOSSAN Station Information SWAT Team Assessment 230 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Station Site Profiles: San Luis Obispo County ........................................................................................... 4 San Luis Obispo ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Grover Beach Station ............................................................................................................................... 5 Station Site Profiles: Santa Barbara County .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Simulation Update Summary Report November 2011
    Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Regional Rail Simulation Update Summary Report November 2011 1 This report was authored by Dr. Robert C. Leachman, Leachman & Associates LLC, under contract to Cambridge Systematics, Inc. for the Southern California Association of Governments as part of the Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy. Funding: The preparation of this report was funded in part by grants from the United States Department of Transportation (DOT). Note: The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG, DOT or any organization contributing data in support of the study. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. 2 Table of Contents Background and Introduction ....................................................................................................4 Summary of Mainline Rail Configuration .................................................................................4 Key Assumptions and Routing Alternatives ..............................................................................6 Findings: Track Capacity Improvement Needs .......................................................................14 Estimated Capital Costs for Alternatives .................................................................................19 Freight and Passenger Train Combined
    [Show full text]
  • This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    California High-Speed Train Project Alternatives Analysis Report Anaheim to Los Angeles Section THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK California High-Speed Train Project Alternatives Analysis Report Anaheim to Los Angeles Section TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 California HST Project Background .................................................................................. 1 1.2 Anaheim to Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS Background ..................................................... 1 1.3 Alternatives Analysis Report – Purpose and Structure ..................................................... 1 2.0 Evaluation Measures.......................................................................................... 3 2.1 HST Design Objectives ..................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Criteria ......................................................................... 3 2.3 Identification of Alternatives to be Eliminated / Carried Forward....................................... 6 3.0 Project Alternatives............................................................................................ 7 3.1 Development of Alternatives ............................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Program EIR/EIS.................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • HACLA Report
    Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility Project Prepared for: City of Commerce City of Commerce Transportation Department (CEQA Lead Agency) Claude McFerguson, Director of Transportation 5555 Jillson Street Commerce, CA 90040 Telephone: 323-887-4419 Prepared by: UltraSystems Environmental Inc. 16431 Scientific Way Irvine, CA 92618-4355 Telephone: 949-788-4900 FAX: 949-788-4901 www.ultrasystems.com May 2021 This page left intentionally blank ❖ PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET ❖ PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 1. Project Title City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility (TMF) 2. CEQA Lead Agency and Address City of Commerce Transportation Department 5555 Jillson Street Commerce, CA 90040 3. Responsible Agency City of Commerce Transportation Department 5555 Jillson Street Commerce, CA 90040 4. Contact and Phone Number Claude McFerguson, Director of Transportation (328) 887-4419 ext. 2235 [email protected] 5. Project Applicant City of Commerce Transportation Department 5555 Jillson Street Commerce, CA 90040 6. Project Location Permanent TMF Site: 5926 Sheila Street Commerce, CA 90040 Temporary TMF Site: 5733 Sheila Street Commerce, CA 90040 7. Assessor’s Parcel Numbers Permanent TMF Site: APNs 6334-025-911 and -912 Temporary TMF Site: APNs 6334-006-900 and -901 8. Project Site General Plan Permanent TMF Site: Designation(s) Heavy Industrial Temporary TMF Site: Commercial Manufacturing 9. Project Site Zoning Designation(s) Permanent TMF Site: Public Facility (PF) and Heavy Industrial (M2) Temporary TMF Site: Commercial Manufacturing (C1) 7072/City of Commerce Municipal Bus Lines Transit Maintenance Facility Project Page i Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2021 ❖ PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET ❖ 10.
    [Show full text]