DOCSLIB.ORG

California Rail Passenger Program Report 1993/94 - 2002/03

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Rail Passenger Program Report 1993/94 - 2002/03 .... ..__ ··•· .. -· ...,._ -- California Rail Passenger Program Report I 1993/94 - 2002/03 - -········-~=,~ ·~ ~~-2:: ==~.;::;;;;::;.~____.........,._.._==~--=·,..,. .·•· ·.· ;~---. • ...•. ·:·.• . ..-' ...,~ ' ' ·.:.;,_• ·~· , . ,, _ State of California ·· · · .. · Department of Transportation !Ji' . December 1993 fim""""n~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY J>ETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001 (916) 654-5267 FAX (916) 654-6608 TDD (916) 654-4014 March 1, 1994 Members, California Legislature State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Members: This transmits the California Rail Passenger Program Report 1993/94 - 2002/03. Section 14036 of the Government Code requires the Department to produce a five-year Rail Passenger Development Plan every other year. Caltrans is producing this ten-year California Rail Passenger Program Report, which includes all of the information required by Section 14036 for the five-year plan, in order to provide an extended planning horizon for rail passenger service in California. The Report examines passenger rail transportation in California. The Report reviews the current operations of State-supported intercity rail passenger service and outlines the Department's ten-year plan for intercity service for the period 1993/94 through 2002/03 for capital improvements and service expansions. Also, for the first time the State's rail report includes a summary of current operations and expansion programs for all forms of passenger rail: intercity, commuter and urban. Chapter V - The State Intercity Rail Capital Program displays a ten-year program of capital improvement projects to upgrade and expand the three State-supported intercity routes. The program totals $1.2 billion, of which 77 percent has identified funding sources. Chapters XII - Commuter Rail Services and XIII - Urban Guideway Services provide detailed operations and capital program information on existing and proposed commuter and urban rail systems. Draft copies of the Report were distributed to a number of State agencies, local public agencies - including regional transportation planning agencies, businesses - including railroads, non-profit organizations, and rail corridor agencies for review and comment. The Department responded to all comment letters received from organizations. These comment letters and the Department's responses are included in their entirety in the Report. Members, California Legislature March 1, 1994 Page2 As required by Section 14036, this Report was presented to the California Transportation Commission for its advice and consent. In January the Commission provided advice on the Report and the upcoming 1995/96 - 2004/05 Report in a Commission Resolution. In February 1994 the Commission adopted a Resolution giving its consent to the Report. Enclosed are copies of the Resolutions. Sincerely, Enclosure OCTAVIA DIENER, Ch•lrm•n STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON JERRY B. EPSTEIN, Vice Chainnan GOVERNOR JOSEPH DUFFEL DANIEL WM. FESSLER KEN KEVORKIAN ROBERT SHELTON ROBERT A. WOLF SENATOR QUENTIN KOPP, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMAN RICHARD KATZ, Ex Officio ROBERT I. REMEN, Execu!Mt Oirec:10r CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, P.O. BOX942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX (916) 653-2134 FAX (916) 654-4364 (916) 654-4245 February 23, 1994 Honorable Quentin Kopp, Chairman Senate Transportation Committee State Capitol, Room 2195 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Richard Katz, Chairman Assembly Transportation Committee State Capitol, Room 3132 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Senator Kopp and Assemblyman Katz: The California Transportation Commission is transmitting to the Legislature the 1993 Ten-Year Rail Passenger Development Program Report with the Commission's resolutions giving advice (#G-94-01) and consent (#G-94-04) (enclosures), as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year report discusses intercity, commuter, and urban rail service in California, explains the California rail network and service, describes the rail and connecting bus service on various individual routes, and presents the Department's ten-year recommendations concerning the level of state-supported service on a specific route and the amount of state funding required to support this service. It also discusses rail planning, programming, and funding processes for operations and capital improvements, intercity rail feasibility studies, and high speed ground transportation and other technology improvements. The Commission's advice resolution (#G-94-01) noted that Caltrans should include in its 1993 ten-year report explicit ten-year goals and policy objectives for the state's intercity service and similar goals for assisting the commuter and urban rail systems~ explain the impact of funding shortfalls; and address the need for rehabilitation of rolling stock and capital assets. Senator Kopp and Assemblyman Katz Page2 Further, the Commission advised Caltrans to address in its ypcoming 1995 ten-year report the following: • Explain the impact on California's rail systems, if the 1994 AB 973 rail bond measure does not pass. • Study and quantify the issue of rehabilitation of rolling stock and capital assets and examine legislative, planning, and financing mechanisms for adequate rehabilitation. • Inventory the anticipated aggregate demand for rolling stock in California over the coming decade and beyond and the potential demand for enhancing California's economic base. • Inventory the anticipated aggregate demand for use of railroad rights-of-way and agreements with private railroads for increased passenger rail service. • Propose legislative and policy changes that would enable the State to :financially and effectively operate and expand its intercity rail service and facilitate the development of high-speed rail service, providing those changes support the SCR 6 20-year High-Speed Intercity Ground Transportation Plan. • Identify federal policies that need to be changed or established to develop California's high speed rail (San Diego-Los Angeles-San Francisco Bay Area-Sacramento) corridor in a manner similar to the Northeast corridor (Washington, D.C.-New York-Boston). We appreciate the opportunity to give advice and consent on Caltrans' 1993 Ten-Year Rail Passenger Development Program Report. We intend our comments to be constructive in producing a document that identifies and addresses current and potential future issues for the Administration and the Legislature. We hope to continue, in cooperation with Caltrans and local agencies, the implementation and expansion of intercity and commuter rail service in California. Sincerely, ~ -~~ OCTAVIA DIENER Chair Enclosures RPASSLTR:RC:cj PASSED BY CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION CO:MMISSION Commission Advice on the Department's 10-Y ear Rail Passenger Program Report Resolution G-94-01 1.1 WHEREAS the California Transportation Commission is required by Government Code Section 14036 to give its advice and consent on the Department's Rail Passenger Development Plan; and · 1.2 WHEREAS the Rail Passenger Development Plan which was due in 1993 on a biennial basis was suspended by AB 2824 (Speier, 1992), as a cost saving measure, during the 1992 budget process; and 1.3 WHEREAS Caltrans has prepared the California Rail Passenger Program Report in order to update its five-year planning efforts as part of a more comprehensive 10-year report; and 1.4 WHEREAS the IO-Year Rail Passenger Program Report is complementary to the Department's 20-Year California Transportation Plan; and 1.5 WHEREAS the Commission has reviewed the Caltrans draft 1993 Rail Passenger Program Report at its August 1993 meeting, and the revised draft 1993 Rail Passenger Program Report at its December 1993 and January 1994 meetings; 2.1 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the California Transportation Commission has reviewed the Department's draft 1993 IO-Year Rail Passenger Program Report and under Section 14036 of the Government Code gives its advice below. 2.2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the tinal 1993 Rail Passenger Program Report include: a. Explicit 10-year goals and policy objectives for the state's intercity rail s~rvice and similar goals for assisting the commuter and urban rail systems. ' b. Explain how the report is interlinked and complementary to the California State Transportation Plan. 2 c. For state intercity rail services show all necessary resources, including local and federal contributions, for a 10-year period of operations and capital improvements and identify the potential need that Caltrans has by five-year period, rather than showing a cumulative 10- year total. Further, Caltrans should prioritize elements of the 10-year program if sufficient funds are not available. d. Explain the impact caused by the failure of Proposition 156 on California's rail systems. e. When proposing new or any enhanced rail services, Caltrans should develop a funding plan which identifies ill financial resources necessary to fund capital improvements, rolling stock and operations of the service, as well ilS any estimated shortfalls from existing revenue sources. f. Address the need to rehabilitate rolling stock and capital assets (rolling stock, tracks, stations, signals, etc.) both for urban/commuter and for intercity rail services, over the next 10 years due to life-cycle requirements and the estimated costs, as well as potential funding services. g. All charts and sections in the plan should reflect the entire I 0-year period.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Surfliner-San Luis Obispo-San Diego-October282019
    PACIFIC SURFLINER® PACIFIC SURFLINER® SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO Effective October 28, 2019 Effective October 28, 2019 ® ® SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA VENTURA - LOS ANGELES VENTURA - LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO and intermediate stations and intermediate stations Including Including CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES connecting connecting NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Amtrak.com Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 PACIFIC SURFLINER - Southbound Train Number u 5804 5818 562 1564 564 1566 566 768 572 1572 774 Normal Days of Operation u Daily Daily Daily SaSuHo Mo-Fr SaSuHo Mo-Fr Daily Mo-Fr SaSuHo Daily 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Also Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Not Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y On Board Service u låO låO låO låO låO l å O l å O l å O l å O Mile Symbol q SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA –Cal Poly 0 >v Dp b3 45A –Amtrak Station mC ∑w- b4 00A l6 55A Grover Beach, CA 12 >w- b4 25A 7 15A Santa Maria, CA–IHOP® 24 >w b4 40A Guadalupe-Santa Maria, CA 25 >w- 7 31A Lompoc-Surf Station, CA 51 > 8 05A Lompoc, CA–Visitors Center 67 >w Solvang, CA 68 >w b5 15A Buellton, CA–Opp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Crossing
    The Third Crossing A Megaproject in a Megaregion www.thirdcrossing.org Final Report, February 2017 Transportation Planning Studio Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the College of Environmental Design (CED) at UC Berkeley, the University of California Transportation Center and Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS), UC Berkeley for support. A special thanks also goes to the helpful feedback from studio instructor Karen Trapenberg Frick and UC Berkeley faculty and researchers including Jesus Barajas and Jason Corburn. We also acknowledge the tremendous support and insights from colleagues at numerous public agencies and non-profit organizations throughout California. A very special thanks goes to David Ory, Michael Reilly, and Fletcher Foti of MTC for their gracious support in running regional travel and land use models, and to Professor Paul Waddell and Sam Blanchard of UrbanSim, Inc. for lending their resources and expertise in land use modeling. We also thank our classmates Joseph Poirier and Lee Reis; as well as David Eifler, Teresa Caldeira, Jennifer Wolch, Robert Cervero, Elizabeth Deakin, Malla Hadley, Leslie Huang and other colleagues at CED; and, Alexandre Bayen, Laura Melendy and Jeanne Marie Acceturo of ITS Berkeley. About Us We are a team of 15 graduate students in City Planning, Transportation Engineering, and Public Health. This project aims to facilitate a conversation about the future of transportation between the East Bay and San Francisco and in the larger Northern California megaregion. We are part of the Department of City and Regional Planning in the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design, with support from the University of California Transportation Center and The Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 Air Quality Conformity Analysis
    DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY AND CONSISTENCY REPORT JULY 2021 PBA2050 COMMISH BOARD DRAFT 06.14.21 Metropolitan Transportation Association of City Representatives Commission Bay Area Governments Susan Adams Alfredo Pedroza, Chair Jesse Arreguín, President Councilmember, City of Rohnert Park Napa County and Cities Mayor, City of Berkeley Nikki Fortunato Bas Nick Josefowitz, Vice Chair Belia Ramos, Vice President Councilmember, City of Oakland San Francisco Mayor's Appointee Supervisor, County of Napa London Breed Margaret Abe-Koga David Rabbitt, Mayor, City and County of San Francisco Cities of Santa Clara County Immediate Past President Tom Butt Supervisor, County of Sonoma Eddie H. Ahn Mayor, City of Richmond San Francisco Bay Conservation Pat Eklund and Development Commission County Representatives Mayor, City of Novato David Canepa Candace Andersen Maya Esparza San Mateo County Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Councilmember, City of San José Cindy Chavez David Canepa Carroll Fife Santa Clara County Supervisor, County of San Mateo Councilmember, City of Oakland Damon Connolly Keith Carson Neysa Fligor Marin County and Cities Supervisor, County of Alameda Mayor, City of Los Altos Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cindy Chavez Leon Garcia Cities of Alameda County Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of American Canyon Dina El-Tawansy Otto Lee Liz Gibbons California State Transportation Agency Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of Campbell (CalSTA) Gordon Mar Giselle Hale Victoria Fleming Supervisor, City and County Vice Mayor, City of Redwood City Sonoma County and Cities of San Francisco Barbara Halliday Dorene M. Giacopini Rafael Mandelman Mayor, City of Hayward U.S. Department of Transportation Supervisor, City and County Rich Hillis Federal D.
    [Show full text]
  • November/December 2020
    Nov. – Dec. 2020 Issue Number 865 Editor’s Comments The next Membership meeting will be a virtual Zoom meeting at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, January 7. Inside This Issue If you know someone who wants to view the meeting, either a visiting railfan or an interested person, it is okay to pass the Editor’s Comments 1 link onto them (but please do not send to large groups). Inside This Issue 1 Watch for an email with meeting sign-in details. Club Officers 1 President’s Comments You will notice that this issue is a bit longer than our normal. 2 We decided that it was time to better coordinate the issue Amtrak News 2 month with the calendar, so this issue is a one-time combina- Pictures from Many of the CRRC Steam Trips 3-6 tion of two months of H & M. In January, we will return to our typical monthly issue of 16 pages. In the meantime, Virtual Railfanning in Time of COVID-19 7 please enjoy this month’s articles and its many photos. Santa Fe, Ohio? 8-9 Happy Holidays! Let’s all have a safe and happy New Year! A Visit to Kentucky Steam Heritage Corporation 10-15 Railfan’s Diary 16-21 Do you have thoughts and questions that you’d like to Steam News 22-27 share in future Headlight & Markers? Meeting Notice 28 Send electronic submissions to: [email protected] Perhaps you’ve thought of submitting an article or two --- now would be a great time to do so! Dave Puthoff Club Officers Club Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Goleta Depot
    GOLETA DEPOT The History of a Rural Railroad Station GARY B. COOMBS NOTES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR READERS This is the new digital edition of Goleta Depot: The History Of A Rural Railroad Station. Anyone who would like their own copy of the book may obtain one by clicking here or by visiting the following web address: http://goletadepot.org/_depotbooklinks/redirectlinks.php?redirect=0 You may also use this address for obtaining additional copies – for your- self or for others. (Note: After Oct. 31, 2015, copies of the book will only be available in the non-personalized version.) You may also make a copy of this file for your own archival purposes. Please do not make copies of this file for distribution to others. Doing so is in violation of copyright. The recommended way to read and use this book is as follows: 1. Download the complete file to your computer. 2. To read the book, load the pdf file into Adobe Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, or another dedicated pdf reader application. We do not recommend trying to read the book in your Internet browser using an Acrobat plug-in. You will want to reserve your browser for viewing many of the outside resources that are accessed through the hyperlinks found throughout the book. 3. It is highly recommended that you set your pdf reader for either two-page viewing (View/Page Display/Two-Page Viewing) or two-page scrolling (View/Page Display/Two-Page Scrolling) using the menu at the top of the reader window. Some pdf readers may do this automatically.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report
    STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Amtrak Pacific Surfliner MEETING DATE: January 19, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: 12 A STAFF CONTACT: Andrew Orfila, Michael Powers RECOMMENDATION: Receive summary on ridership by station for Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner Service SUMMARY: At the October joint meeting between SBCAG and SLOCOG, board members requested information on passenger rail usage. Data was provided to SBCAG by Caltrans and Amtrak staff that summarizes historical ridership patterns for Amtrak’s facilities in Santa Barbara County dating back to fiscal year 1999. Amtrak/Caltrans staff also provided ridership data for Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner route for the month of August 2005. This report can be used to track general Amtrak ridership trends and to develop potential market packages for the Pacific Surfliner and other passenger rail lines. The report also highlights interregional passenger usage of rail between Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties. In summary: • The data indicates a general trend of increasing Amtrak ridership in Santa Barbara County. • The Santa Barbara train station serves the most passengers within the County. There were 270,080 passengers that boarded (passengers on) or alighted (passengers off) at the Santa Barbara train station in fiscal year 2005. This total includes both train and bus ridership numbers. Ridership increases have been steady at the Santa Barbara station over the last seven years, but were down 8% from FY 2004 to 2005. • The second most popular station in the County is Goleta, with 66,531 passengers that boarded/alighted (trains plus buses) for fiscal year 2005. Ridership has increased significantly at Amtrak’s Goleta station, with annual increases of 51% from FY 2003 to 2004 and 46% from FY 2004 to 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Caltrain Short Term Service Study
    Caltrain Short-Term Service and Fleet Study FINAL REPORT Prepared for the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board By SYSTRA Consulting March 2000 Cal, TM Caltrain Short-Term Service and Fleet Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Acknowledgements 1 2. Executive Summary 2 3. Introduction and Purpose 6 4. Service and Performance Standards 7 5. Ridership Trends 9 6. Dwell Time Reduction 13 7. Short Term Service Options 14 7.1 Service Option No.1: Schedule Optimization to Address Reverse Peak 14 7.2 Service Option NO.2: Selected Trains Turn at Millbrae Station 21 7.3 Service Option NO.3: Palo Alto to Gilroy Additional Train Service 28 7.4 Service Option NO.4: Medium-Term Schedule Optimization 34 7.5 Service Option NO.5: Medium-Term Schedule Optimization, Gilroy Service Extension 42 7.6 Service Option NO.6: Medium-Term Completely New Schedule, Repetitive Zone Patterns 49 7.7 Key Recommendations 57 8. Related Service Planning Issues 59 8.1 Yard and Terminal Capacity 59 8.2 Third Track Utilization and Capital Requirements 60 9. Source Documents 64 10. Appendix 65 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Summary Table of Findings 5 Table 2: Factors Expected to Influence Ridership Increases 11 Table 3: County-to-County Commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area 1990-2020 12 Table 4: Service Options Matrix 15 Table 5: Conceptual Train-Equipment Cycles for Service Option No.1 19 Table 6: Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost Indices for Service Option No.1 20 Table 7: Conceptual Train-Equipment Cycles for Service Option No.2 25 Table 8: Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost Indices
    [Show full text]
  • Carlsbad Village Double Track Final Draft EA for Publication.Pdf
    Environmental Assessment for thet Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Prepared for Prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment for the Carlsbad Village Double Track Project prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. 304 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 April 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Project Purpose and Need......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Applicable Regulations and Permits ........................................................................................... 1-4 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda [PDF, 1297
    Members Lori Holt Pfeiler, Chair Mayor, Escondido (Representing North County Inland) Patty Davis, Vice Chair Deputy Mayor, Chula Vista (Representing South County) Matt Hall Mayor Pro Tem, Carlsbad (Representing North County Coastal) REGIONAL Jerry Jones Councilmember, Lemon Grove (Representing East County) PLANNING Scott Peters Councilmember, City of San Diego COMMITTEE Bill Horn Supervisor, County of San Diego Alternates Friday, July 1, 2005 Judy Ritter Councilmember, Vista Noon to 2 p.m. (Representing North County Inland) SANDAG Board Room Patricia McCoy th Councilmember, Imperial Beach 401 B Street, 7 Floor (Representing South County) San Diego Bud Lewis Mayor, Carlsbad (Representing North County Coastal) Barry Jantz Vice Mayor, La Mesa (Representing East County) Jim Madaffer AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Councilmember, City of San Diego Pam Slater-Price Chairwoman, County of San Diego • CHARTER, CHAIR, AND MEMBERSHIP OF THE Advisory Members ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM (EMP) Susannah Aguilera WORKING GROUP U.S. Department of Defense Leon Williams Chairman, Metropolitan Transit System • SMART GROWTH IN THE BIRD ROCK COMMUNITY Dave Druker North San Diego County • DRAFT SMART GROWTH CONCEPT MAP Transit Development Board Howard Williams San Diego County Water Authority William Hall/Bill Briggs San Diego Unified Port District PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING Pedro Orso-Delgado District 11 Director, Caltrans Gail Goldberg YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE Regional Planning Technical Working Group MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEB SITE AT WWW.SANDAG.ORG Bill Anderson Regional Planning Stakeholders Working Group Environmental Mitigation Program MISSION STATEMENT Advisory Members The Regional Planning Committee provides oversight for the preparation and Therese O’Rourke implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Plan that is based on the local general U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • MTS San Diego Trolley NCTD Coaster NCTD Sprinter
    Media Platforms Advertising Programs For Every Budget • Admedia Enclosures • 3’x4’ Advertising Signs • Station Domination Programs VendSight • Floor Graphics are available upon request. No minimum number of units required. • Wallscapes Graphics design services are available. • Transit Guide Advertising-Print • Bluetooth advertising • Product Sampling AdMedia rental units available at select locations. Units available for product displays, promotions, sampling or job recruitment. Call for details. Station domination programs available. Call for details. Public Transportation Advertising Throughout San Diego County Turn Key Vending Management Services Available Call For Details MTS San Diego Trolley NCTD Coaster NCTD Sprinter Floor Graphics Triangle Kiosks Sampling Programs Contact: VendSight (619) 562-1486 • 1-877-426-6748 www.vendsight.com Contact: VendSight (619) 562-1486 • 1-877-426-6748 www.vendsight.com VendSight oers an unprecedented reach to public transportation consumers throughout San Diego County. The Coaster The Sprinter 50 Available Admedia Enclosures 50 Available Admedia Enclosures • Downtown San Diego to Oceanside • 50 3’x4’ Advertising Signs San Diego Trolley • 50 3’x4’ Advertising Signs • Station Domination Programs 100 AdMedia Enclosures along the San Diego Trolley lines. • Station Domination Programs • Floor Graphics • Floor Graphics • Wallscapes 3’ x 4’ xes signs • San Ysidro-Downtown • Wallscapes • Transit Guide Advertising-Print • Blue Line, Green Line, Orange Line San Diego County is home to 53 cities and 2.9 • Transit Guide Advertising-Print Destinations Include: • Bluetooth advertising • Gaslamp, Old Town, San Diego State, million people. San Diego County is ranked as • Bluetooth advertising • Product Sampling Print advertising also available the 2nd largest city in California with the 16th Del Mar Fairgrounds, Downtown Qualcomm, San Ysidro Border Mission Valley, largest population of all metropolitan cities in • Product Sampling PetCo Park, San Diego Convention Center, America.
    [Show full text]