DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 Air Quality Conformity Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 Air Quality Conformity Analysis DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY AND CONSISTENCY REPORT JULY 2021 PBA2050 COMMISH BOARD DRAFT 06.14.21 Metropolitan Transportation Association of City Representatives Commission Bay Area Governments Susan Adams Alfredo Pedroza, Chair Jesse Arreguín, President Councilmember, City of Rohnert Park Napa County and Cities Mayor, City of Berkeley Nikki Fortunato Bas Nick Josefowitz, Vice Chair Belia Ramos, Vice President Councilmember, City of Oakland San Francisco Mayor's Appointee Supervisor, County of Napa London Breed Margaret Abe-Koga David Rabbitt, Mayor, City and County of San Francisco Cities of Santa Clara County Immediate Past President Tom Butt Supervisor, County of Sonoma Eddie H. Ahn Mayor, City of Richmond San Francisco Bay Conservation Pat Eklund and Development Commission County Representatives Mayor, City of Novato David Canepa Candace Andersen Maya Esparza San Mateo County Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Councilmember, City of San José Cindy Chavez David Canepa Carroll Fife Santa Clara County Supervisor, County of San Mateo Councilmember, City of Oakland Damon Connolly Keith Carson Neysa Fligor Marin County and Cities Supervisor, County of Alameda Mayor, City of Los Altos Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cindy Chavez Leon Garcia Cities of Alameda County Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of American Canyon Dina El-Tawansy Otto Lee Liz Gibbons California State Transportation Agency Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of Campbell (CalSTA) Gordon Mar Giselle Hale Victoria Fleming Supervisor, City and County Vice Mayor, City of Redwood City Sonoma County and Cities of San Francisco Barbara Halliday Dorene M. Giacopini Rafael Mandelman Mayor, City of Hayward U.S. Department of Transportation Supervisor, City and County Rich Hillis Federal D. Glover of San Francisco Planning Director, City and Contra Costa County Nate Miley County of San Francisco Sam Liccardo Supervisor, County of Alameda Dave Hudson San José Mayor's Appointee Karen Mitchoff Mayor, City of San Ramon Nate Miley Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Matthew Mahan Alameda County Stephanie Moulton-Peters Councilmember, City of San José Gina Papan Supervisor, County of Marin Raul Peralez Cities of San Mateo County James P. Spering Councilmember, City of San José David Rabbitt Supervisor, County of Solano Carlos Romero Association of Bay Area Governments Vacant Mayor, City of East Palo Alto Hillary Ronen County of San Mateo Loren Taylor City and County of San Francisco Councilmember, City of Oakland Libby Schaaf Lori Wilson Oakland Mayor's Appointee Mayor, City of Suisun City James P. Spering Vacant Solano County and Cities City and County of San Francisco Amy R. Worth (Mayor's Appointee) Cities of Contra Costa County Advisory Member Vacant Jayne Battey U.S. Department of Housing Board Member, San Francisco Bay and Urban Development Regional Water Quality Control Board i Association of Bay Area Governments 375 Beale Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.abag.ca.gov | 415.820.7900 Metropolitan Transportation Commission 375 Beale Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-2066 www.mtc.ca.gov | 415.778.6700 Draft Plan Bay Area 2050: Air Quality Conformity and Consistency Report Project Staff Dave Vautin Plan Bay Area 2050 Project Manager Harold Brazil Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis Project Manager Adam Noelting Regional Planning Program Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis Report Contributor Acknowledgements Author Harold Brazil Cover Design Miguel Osorio Editor Terry Lee Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................ 1 Purpose of Conformity Analysis ............................................................... 1 Air Pollution and Human Health ............................................................... 4 Emissions ............................................................................................... 4 Ambient Concentrations ............................................................................. 5 Population Exposure .................................................................................. 5 Dosage .................................................................................................. 5 Health Effects ......................................................................................... 5 Status of Regional Transportation Plan ...................................................... 5 Status of Transportation Improvement Program ............................................ 6 Chapter 2: Bay Area Air Pollutant Designations ........................................... 8 Background ....................................................................................... 8 National 1-Hour Ozone Standard .............................................................. 8 National 8-Hour Ozone Standard .............................................................. 9 National PM2.5 Standard ...................................................................... 10 National 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide Standard ............................................... 11 Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets and Conformity Tests ..................... 11 Chapter 3: Conformity Analysis & Results ................................................. 14 Approach to Conformity Analysis ........................................................... 14 Analysis Years .................................................................................. 15 Consultation Process .......................................................................... 16 June 2020 ............................................................................................. 16 January 2021 .......................................................................................... 16 February 2021 ........................................................................................ 16 May 2021 .............................................................................................. 16 July 2021 .............................................................................................. 17 September 2021 ...................................................................................... 17 Comparison of Motor Vehicle Emissions to Budgets ...................................... 17 Ozone Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets ........................................................... 17 Comparison of Estimated Regional On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions to the Ozone Precursor Budgets ............................................................................. 18 Senate Bill 1 (SB 1)................................................................................... 18 Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) ......................................................................... 19 Draft Plan Bay Area 205 0 Page | i Baseline Year Emissions Test for PM2.5 ..................................................... 21 Chapter 4: Transportation Control Measures .............................................. 24 History of Transportation Control Measures ............................................... 24 Status of Transportation Control Measures ................................................ 25 Chapter 5: Response to Public Comments ................................................. 28 Chapter 6: Conformity Findings .............................................................. 29 Appendix A. List of Regionally Significant Projects in Plan Bay Area 2050 .......... 30 Appendix B. List of Projects in the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) ............................................................................................... 42 Appendix C. Draft Plan Bay Area 2050: Forecasting and Modeling Report .......... 93 Appendix D. List of Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Projects .............. 240 Appendix E. Methodology for Bay Area Conformity Determinations ................ 259 Appendix F. SAFE Vehicle Rule Part 1: EMFAC Adjustment Factor Methodology and Correspondence ............................................................................... 272 Appendix G. Glossary ........................................................................ 288 Air Quality Conformity and Consistency Report Page | ii List of Tables Table 1: VOC and NOX Emissions Budgets from 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan (tons/day) ....... 17 Table 2: Vehicle Activity Forecasts ..................................................................... 18 Table 3: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors – Summertime Conditions (tons/day) .................................................................................................. 19 Table 4: Emission Reductions for Transportation Control Measures A – E in State Implementation Plan (tons/day) ........................................................................ 21 Table 5: Vehicle Activity Forecasts for the PM2.5 Baseline Year Test .............................. 21 1 Table 6: Emissions Comparison for the PM2.5 Baseline Year Test .................................. 22 Table 7: Transportation Control Measure in the State Implementation Plan ..................... 25 Table 8: Implementation Status of Federal Transportation Control Measures for Ozone (A – E) ............................................................................................................... 26 Draft Plan Bay Area 205 0 Page | iii List of Figures Figure 1: Map of the Non-Attainment Area for the San Francisco Bay Area ....................... 3 Figure 2: Relationship Between Air Pollution
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review Across Us Transit Agencies
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Transportation Engineering Masters Projects Civil and Environmental Engineering 2018 ZERO-EMISSION TRANSIT BUS AND REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES AND DEPLOYMENT STATUS: A REVIEW ACROSS U.S. TRANSIT AGENCIES Aikaterini Deliali Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cee_transportation Part of the Transportation Engineering Commons Deliali, Aikaterini, "ZERO-EMISSION TRANSIT BUS AND REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES AND DEPLOYMENT STATUS: A REVIEW ACROSS U.S. TRANSIT AGENCIES" (2018). Transportation Engineering Masters Projects. 5. https://doi.org/10.7275/78av-7x59 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil and Environmental Engineering at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Engineering Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ZERO-EMISSION TRANSIT BUS AND REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES AND DEPLOYMENT STATUS: A REVIEW ACROSS U.S. TRANSIT AGENCIES A Project Presented by AIKATERINI DELIALI Master of Science in Civil Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 4/5/2018 iv ABSTRACT Globally there have been considerable efforts of decarbonizing the transportation sector, as it has been found to be largely responsible for greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. One strategy to achieving this is the implementation of zero-emission buses in transit fleets. This paper summarizes the characteristics of three zero-emission bus technologies: 1) battery electric buses; 2) fuel cell battery electric buses; and 3) fuel cell plug-in hybrid electric buses. All of these technologies do not produce tailpipe emission and can potentially be emission-free in a well-to-wheel content, depending on the fuel source.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranchos of California
    COUNTY RANCHO By Cities on or near this rancho Alameda San Antonio Spain Alameda, Oakland, Berkeley, Albany,Emeryville, Piedmont, San Leandro Alameda San Ramon Mexico Dublin area and also in Contra Costa County Alameda Agua Caliente Mexico Fremont (Warm Springs area) near the mission Alameda Los Positas Mexico Livermore area Alameda Canada Vaqueros Mexico Livermore, but mostly in Contra Costa County Alameda San Leandro Mexico San Leandro, San Lorenzo area Alameda El Valle de San Jose Mexico Pleasanton, Sunol Alameda Potrero de los Cerritos Mexico Union City Alameda San Lorenzo Mexico Hayward, Castro Valley Alameda Arroyo de la Alameda Mexico Fremont (Niles area) Alameda Santa Rita Mexico Livermore, Dublin, Sunol Alpine No Ranchos See Yolo and Solano counties Amador No Ranchos See Yolo and Solano counties Butte Rancho del Arroyo Chico Mexico Along the river in Chico Butte Esquon Mexico Chico, Butte Creek, 7 miles south of Chico Butte Aguas Frias, later known as the Mexico South of Durham Pratt Grant Butte Bosquejo Mexico Between Chico and Los Molinos; Red Bluff (in Tehama County) Butte Llano Seco, later known as the Mexico Near Chico and Durham Parrott Grant Calaveras No early Ranchos See San Joaquin & Shasta counties Colusa Larkin Grant (surveyed by John Mexico West bank of Sacramento River in Princeton area and into Bidwell) Glenn County. Contra Costa San Pablo Mexico El Cerrito, Richmond, and San Pablo. Contra Costa San Ramon Mexico San Ramon Valley, Dublin, Alamo, and surrounding areas Contra Costa El Sobrante de San Ramon Mexico Walnut Creek, Tice Valley, East of Alamo (Stone Ranch area) Contra Costa Acalanes Mexico Lafayette, Happy Valley area Contra Costa Los Medanos (Meganos) Mexico Brentwood and Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction This document is a supplemental environmental impact report (SEIR), prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.) (referred to herein as CEQA Guidelines). CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines are referred to herein collectively as CEQA. This SEIR is a supplement to the BART Warm Springs Extension Environmental Impact Report that was certified on September 15, 1992. The SEIR is an informational document intended to inform the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) Board of Directors, public agencies, and the public about the potentially significant environmental effects that may result from implementation of the BART Warm Springs Extension (WSX) (herein called the Proposed Project). See Section 1.6 for an explanation of the relationship of this SEIR to the EIR certified in 1992. The environmental analysis incorporated herein identifies the environmental impacts of an extension of the BART system in the City of Fremont (Fremont), from its current terminus in central Fremont to the Warm Springs district of Fremont. Once certified, this SEIR will provide the basis for BART to adopt a project. This analysis will support the development of an effective mitigation program for site-specific mitigation of potentially significant environmental impacts, and provide information to interested members of the public and public agencies about modifications to the 1992 Adopted Project and various potential impacts resulting from the modified project. Through the formal public review process, the public and various organizations and agencies will have an opportunity to comment on this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget & Finance Agenda
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MOBILE SOURCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS TIM SMITH - CHAIR JAKE McGOLDRICK – VICE CHAIR TOM BATES SCOTT HAGGERTY YORIKO KISHIMOTO CAROL KLATT MARK ROSS JOHN SILVA GAYLE B. UILKEMA WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 19, 2008 4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Immediately following Board Meeting DISTRICT OFFICES AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items Pursuant to Government Code § 54954.3) Members of the public are afforded the opportunity to speak on any agenda item. All agendas for regular meetings are posted at District headquarters, 939 Ellis Street, San Francisco, CA, at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting. At the beginning of the regular meeting agenda, an opportunity is also provided for the public to speak on any subject within the Committee’s subject matter jurisdiction. Speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes each. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 23, 2008 4. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACTOR SELECTION FOR THE VEHICLE BUY-BACK PROGRAM J. Colbourn/5192 [email protected] The Committee will consider recommending Board of Directors’ approval of one or more contractors to provide dismantling services for the Vehicle Buy Back Program. 5. CONSIDERATION OF $41,498,594 IN CALIFORNIA GOODS MOVEMENT BOND FUNDING PROJECTS J. Broadbent/5052 [email protected] The Committee will consider recommending Board of Directors’ approval of staff recommendations for $41,498,594 in funding for eligible projects under the California Goods Movement Bond Program and authorize the Executive Officer/APCO to enter into all necessary contracts to expend the requested funds. 6. AUDIT OF THE TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR (TFCA) REGIONAL FUND J.
    [Show full text]
  • Basques in the Americas from 1492 To1892: a Chronology
    Basques in the Americas From 1492 to1892: A Chronology “Spanish Conquistador” by Frederic Remington Stephen T. Bass Most Recent Addendum: May 2010 FOREWORD The Basques have been a successful minority for centuries, keeping their unique culture, physiology and language alive and distinct longer than any other Western European population. In addition, outside of the Basque homeland, their efforts in the development of the New World were instrumental in helping make the U.S., Mexico, Central and South America what they are today. Most history books, however, have generally referred to these early Basque adventurers either as Spanish or French. Rarely was the term “Basque” used to identify these pioneers. Recently, interested scholars have been much more definitive in their descriptions of the origins of these Argonauts. They have identified Basque fishermen, sailors, explorers, soldiers of fortune, settlers, clergymen, frontiersmen and politicians who were involved in the discovery and development of the Americas from before Columbus’ first voyage through colonization and beyond. This also includes generations of men and women of Basque descent born in these new lands. As examples, we now know that the first map to ever show the Americas was drawn by a Basque and that the first Thanksgiving meal shared in what was to become the United States was actually done so by Basques 25 years before the Pilgrims. We also now recognize that many familiar cities and features in the New World were named by early Basques. These facts and others are shared on the following pages in a chronological review of some, but by no means all, of the involvement and accomplishments of Basques in the exploration, development and settlement of the Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Closures and Transit Updates Napa and Sonoma Wildfires Safety Cal Fire, National Weather Th Tuesday, October 10 , 2017 Service, Department Of
    Additional Resources Road Closures and Transit Updates Napa and Sonoma Wildfires Safety Cal Fire, National Weather th Tuesday, October 10 , 2017 Service, Department of Homeland Security, PG&E, Updates SFPD, SF Department of For maps of impacted areas in the North Bay, please refer to KRON4, SF Emergency Management, Chronicle, and the County of Napa. Please also monitor County of Sonoma for AlertSF, TMASF Connects evacuation centers, power outage information, and road and traffic details. Emergency Factsheet Sheriff’s offices in Napa and Sonoma county are releasing alerts via Nixle of fire Media updates and road closures. If you haven’t already opted to receive emergency KRON 4, KCBS, KGO, KTVU, NBC Bay Area, alerts from Nixle, text your zip code to 888777 to receive information such as SF Gate evacuation orders, emergency shelter locations, and road closures. Commute Sheriff’s departments are encouraging friends and family of evacuees to check 511, SMART, Golden Gate to see if your loved ones are registered as safe on safeandwell.org. Transit, Sonoma County Transit, SFMTA Muni, According to AlertSF, air quality is diminished today. The SF Main, Chinatown, BART, SF Bay Ferry, AC Mission Bay, and Glen Park branch libraries have filtered air and are available Transit, Caltrain, SamTrans, for respite from poor air quality. VTA, CHP, Caltrans Road Closures in Napa and Sonoma TMASF Connects Website Please monitor SFGate and ABC7 as they have lists of highway and road ConnectsLink Map closures in Napa and Sonoma counties that they are continuously updating. Register & Enter to Win Sheriffs are asking motorists to please cooperate with first responders and Announcements respect all closures.
    [Show full text]
  • TPCC Agenda Packet 03.16.2021
    Transit Paratransit Coordinating Committee 1BMEETING AGENDA PLEASE NOTE: The SCTA/RCPA Business Office is closed, and this meeting will be conducted entirely by teleconference pursuant to the provisions of the Governor’s Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-35-20, suspending certain requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. TPCC Members will be calling or video- conferencing into the TPCC Meeting via Zoom. Members of the public who wish to listen to the meeting may do so via the following conference line or Zoom platform: Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84664334791?pwd=aUpxa3Y3TjI0SmJldGFJUFZwME5Vdz09 Meeting ID: 846 6433 4791 Passcode: 985240 Call in: 1 (669) 900-9128 Instructions for Public Comment: Please submit any comments in writing to Drew Nichols at [email protected] by 12:00 noon on March 16 (please identify the agenda item related to your comment and indicate whether your comment should be read aloud or only submitted for the record). March 16, 2021 – 1:30 p.m. Sonoma County Transportation Authority Meeting to be held remotely via Zoom. Information provided above. ITEM 1. Introductions 2. Approval of Meeting Notes: January 19, 2020 – DISCUSSION / ACTION* 3. Vision Zero update, Department of Health Services – Discussion 4. Coordinated Claim FY21/22 Draft – ACTION* 5. Roundtable Updates – Discussion a. Transit / Paratransit Operators b. Mobility Partner Reports 6. Public Comment 7. Items for Next Agenda – Discussion 8. Other Business / Comments / Announcements 411 King Street, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov 1 9. Adjourn *Materials attached. The next SCTA/RCPA meeting will be held April 12, 2021 The next TPCC meeting will be held May 18, 2021 Copies of the full Agenda Packet are available at www.scta.ca.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Land Grab
    [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 1 Financing Land Grab The Direct Involvement of Israeli Banks in the Israeli Settlement Enterprise February 2017 [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 2 [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 3 Financing Land Grab The Direct Involvement of Israeli Banks in the Israeli Settlement Enterprise February 2017 [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 4 Who Profits from the Occupation is a research center dedicated to exposing the commercial involvement of Israeli and international companies in the continued Israeli control over Palestinian and Syrian land. Who Profits operates an online database, which includes information concerning companies that are commercially complicit in the occupation. In addition, the center publishes in-depth reports and flash reports about industries, projects and specific companies. Who Profits also serves as an information center for queries regarding corporate involvement in the occupation. In this capacity, Who Profits assists individuals and civil society organizations working to end the Israeli occupation and to promote international law, corporate social responsibility, social justice and labor rights. www.whoprofits.org | [email protected] [Released under the Official Information Act - July 2018] 5 Contents Executive Summary 7 Introduction 10 Israeli Construction on Occupied Land 14 Benefits for Homebuyers and Contractors in Settlements 16 Financing Construction on Occupied Land 20 The Settlement
    [Show full text]
  • EMMA Official Statement
    NEW ISSUE – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s (2020 Bonds): Aaa Long Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-1 Bonds): AAA Short Term Standard & Poor’s (2020C-2 Bonds): A-1+ See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the District, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2020C-1 Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel further observes that interest on the 2020C-2 Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the 2020 Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS.” $700,000,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $625,005,000 $74,995,000 (ELECTION OF 2016), (ELECTION OF 2016), 2020 SERIES C-1 2020 SERIES C-2 (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) (GREEN BONDS) (GREEN BONDS) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on inside cover The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District General Obligation Bonds (Election of 2016), 2020 Series C-1 (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-1 Bonds”) and 2020 Series C-2 (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) (the “2020C-2 Bonds” and, together with the 2020C-1 Bonds, the “2020 Bonds”) are being issued to finance specific acquisition, construction and improvement projects for District facilities approved by the voters and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2020 Bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Caltrain Short Term Service Study
    Caltrain Short-Term Service and Fleet Study FINAL REPORT Prepared for the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board By SYSTRA Consulting March 2000 Cal, TM Caltrain Short-Term Service and Fleet Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Acknowledgements 1 2. Executive Summary 2 3. Introduction and Purpose 6 4. Service and Performance Standards 7 5. Ridership Trends 9 6. Dwell Time Reduction 13 7. Short Term Service Options 14 7.1 Service Option No.1: Schedule Optimization to Address Reverse Peak 14 7.2 Service Option NO.2: Selected Trains Turn at Millbrae Station 21 7.3 Service Option NO.3: Palo Alto to Gilroy Additional Train Service 28 7.4 Service Option NO.4: Medium-Term Schedule Optimization 34 7.5 Service Option NO.5: Medium-Term Schedule Optimization, Gilroy Service Extension 42 7.6 Service Option NO.6: Medium-Term Completely New Schedule, Repetitive Zone Patterns 49 7.7 Key Recommendations 57 8. Related Service Planning Issues 59 8.1 Yard and Terminal Capacity 59 8.2 Third Track Utilization and Capital Requirements 60 9. Source Documents 64 10. Appendix 65 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Summary Table of Findings 5 Table 2: Factors Expected to Influence Ridership Increases 11 Table 3: County-to-County Commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area 1990-2020 12 Table 4: Service Options Matrix 15 Table 5: Conceptual Train-Equipment Cycles for Service Option No.1 19 Table 6: Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost Indices for Service Option No.1 20 Table 7: Conceptual Train-Equipment Cycles for Service Option No.2 25 Table 8: Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost Indices
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Fact Sheet and Muni Tips With
    8x Public Transit Fact 30 Sheet Map 45 FERRY BUILDING BART BART Stations BART/Muni Stations AND AKL GE ID Muni Subway Stations Muni Bus & Rail EMBARCADERO STATION - O F. 49 S. Y BR For route, schedule, 14 BA fare and accessible MONTGOMERY STATION 14x services information T anytime: Call 311 or visit www.sfmta.com POWELL STATION TRANSBAY TERMINAL (AC TRANSIT) N MARKET ST. CIVIC CENTER STATION 30 8x 45 VAN NESS STATION MISSION ST. D x N 14 U CALTRAIN O J R Caltrain to San Jose San to Caltrain 4TH & KING G K ER D SamTrans to S.F. Airport N N U T CHURCH STATION 16TH ST. N CASTRO STATION STATION 14 K T T 49 22ND ST. 14L 48 STATION FOREST HILL STATION 48 24TH ST. STATION 48 J 8x 14x WEST PORTAL MISSION ST. STATION GLEN PARK STATION 14 14x BART BALBOA K PARK 49 STATION 49 54 T 14 54 8x DALY CITY 14L SAN MATEO COUNTY BAYSHORE STATION STATION San Francisco Public Transit Options FACT SHEET AND MUNI ROUTE TIPS Muni bus routes providing alternate, parallel service to BART service within San Francisco are indicated with numbers, while Muni rail lines are indicated with letters. Adult full Muni fare is $2. Youth and Senior/Disabled fare is 75 cents. Exact change or Clipper Cards are required on Muni vehicles; Muni Metro tickets can be purchased at the Metro vend- ing machines in the subway stations for use at subway fare gates. To reach San Francisco International Airport or other peninsula destinations use SamTrans or Caltrain service.
    [Show full text]