Transit Coordinating Committee

1BMEETING AGENDA PLEASE NOTE: The SCTA/RCPA Business Office is closed, and this meeting will be conducted entirely by teleconference pursuant to the provisions of the Governor’s Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-35-20, suspending certain requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. TPCC Members will be calling or video- conferencing into the TPCC Meeting via Zoom. Members of the public who wish to listen to the meeting may do so via the following conference line or Zoom platform: Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84664334791?pwd=aUpxa3Y3TjI0SmJldGFJUFZwME5Vdz09

Meeting ID: 846 6433 4791 Passcode: 985240

Call in: 1 (669) 900-9128

Instructions for Public Comment: Please submit any comments in writing to Drew Nichols at [email protected] by 12:00 noon on March 16 (please identify the agenda item related to your comment and indicate whether your comment should be read aloud or only submitted for the record). March 16, 2021 – 1:30 p.m. Sonoma County Transportation Authority Meeting to be held remotely via Zoom. Information provided above.

ITEM 1. Introductions 2. Approval of Meeting Notes: January 19, 2020 – DISCUSSION / ACTION* 3. Vision Zero update, Department of Health Services – Discussion 4. Coordinated Claim FY21/22 Draft – ACTION* 5. Roundtable Updates – Discussion a. Transit / Paratransit Operators b. Mobility Partner Reports 6. Public Comment 7. Items for Next Agenda – Discussion 8. Other Business / Comments / Announcements

411 King Street, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov 1 9. Adjourn

*Materials attached.

The next SCTA/RCPA meeting will be held April 12, 2021 The next TPCC meeting will be held May 18, 2021

Copies of the full Agenda Packet are available at www.scta.ca.gov.

ACCOMMODATION FOR PERSONS LIVING WITH A DISABILITY: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternate format or that requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact SCTA at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation.

SB 343 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Transit Paratransit Coordinating Committee after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Sonoma County Transportation Authority office at 411 King Street, during normal business hours.

Pagers, cellular telephones and all other communication devices should be turned off during the committee meeting to avoid electrical interference with the sound recording system.

2 TRANSIT PARATRANSIT COORDINATING COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES Meeting Notes of January 19, 2021 ITEM 1. Introductions Lauren Garbaldi moved for approval of Tim Webster as Vice-Chair, Steve Schmitz seconded. Meeting called to order at 1:32 p.m. by Dana The committee approved the motion. Turrey. 3.2. SCTA/RCPA Meeting Schedule for Committee Members: Dennis Battenberg, Chair, 2021 via phone; Stan Gow, Vice Chair; Tim Webster, Earl Provided for the committee’s information. Baum Center for the Blind; Steven Schmitz, ; Jon Gaffney, Golden Gate 3.3. TPCC Member Roster and Transit; Debbie Baldo, Vivalon (formerly Vacancies Provided for the committee’s information. Whitlestop ); Mohammed Ali, MV Transport/Santa Rosa CityBus; Yuri Koslen, Santa 3.4. TPCC By-Laws - information Rosa CityBus; Silvia Martinez-Palacios, Petaluma Provided for the committee’s information. Transit; Kathleen Cortez, Area Agency on Aging; Lake Kowell, Disability Services and Legal Center; 4. COVID Vaccine Transportation Coordination Lauren Garibaldi, Petaluma Peoples Service; April for Transit Dependent Pearson, Volunteer Wheels; Scotty Milay King, Kathleen Cortez spoke on the COVID vaccine drive- Sebastopol Senior Center. through vaccine clinic recently held at the Guests: Daniel Shelley; Tobias Weare. fairgrounds. However, all slots were filled and there was fewer staff and vaccinations and it is Staff: Dana Turrey; Drew Nichols. believed the most vulnerable population are those 2. Approval of Meeting Notes: November 20, who are not signing up for a vaccine due to the 2020 - DISCUSSION / ACTION* absence of resources to get there. Tim Webster moved for approval of the Ms. Cortez commented on the upcoming November 20, 2020 minutes, Lauren Garbaldi challenges that could affect vulnerable seconded. populations, such as needing paratransit service Approved as submitted. to access vaccines, and asked the committee their 3. Administrative Items opinions. 3.1. Office Elections The committee discussed paratransit and volunteer driver service for vulnerable populations Dana Turrey opened for nominations for Chair. to have transportation to vaccination sites. Tim Webster nominated Dennis Battenberg. April Pearson commented on suggestions to have Stan Gow moved for approval of Dennis the vaccine administered on the bus, so that Battenberg as Chair for 2021, Lake Kowell passengers do not have to board/disembark. seconded. The committee approved the motion. Lake Kowell nominated Tim Webster for Vice Chair.

3 Ms. Cortez further added potential sites – such as school gymnasiums – that could accommodate Jon Gaffney reported ridership is about 30% of the paratransit busses. pre-COVID levels for fixed route and paratransit Tim Webster asked if additional information service respectively; ferry ridership is only 3% of becomes available, to send it out to the pre-COVID levels. committee. Mr. Gaffney announced that due to the additional 5. Round Table Updates federal assistance, the Golden Gate Transportation and Highway District will not be laying off 5.1. Transit / Paratransit Operators employees at this time. Further federal assistance Sonoma County Transit will be needed come spring time. Steven Schmitz announced fixed route schedule 17 new paratransit vehicles have been received changes that increase service to 70% of pre-COVID. and are undergoing preparations for service. There will be other routes reintroduced when in- Santa Rosa CityBus person school sessions begin. Ridership remains about 30% of pre-COVID levels for both fixed route Yuri Koslen reported on fixed-route service and paratransit. modifications to address staffing and social distance challenges. Pre-COVID service levels are Sonoma County Transit has received two expected to return at some point, with some additional electric busses and will serve Rohnert adjustments on previously low-performing routes. Park and Cotati. Mr. Koslen announced fare collection will begin on Tim Webster asked about providing fare free February 1, 2021 and paratransit passengers will transportation to those en route to receive a also have the ability to purchase electronic tickets. vaccine, given the vaccine will be provided by the government. Mr. Koslen further reported on the recently issued RFP for electrification of the CityBus yard. Each transit operator answered that that request has not been brought up at this point, but will look Mohamad Ali spoke on food delivery service in into it at their respective agency. partnership with Catholic Charities. 5.2. Mobility Partner Reports Silvia Martinez-Palacios reported on fare Area Agency on Aging collections starting. Petaluma Transit has made Kathleen Cortez reported AAA is supporting five purchasing monthly bus passes available online. transportation programs in the county in addition Ms. Martinez-Palacios described the paratransit to Sebastopol Senior Center and Petaluma People rider card, which can also be purchased online. Services: West County Community Services Center, This takes the form of a punch card and one can Healdsburg Senior Center, and the Center for purchase up to 12 rides for $33. These can also be Social and Environmental Stewardship. purchased from the bus driver by check or exact Ms. Cortez spoke on the Connected Communities change. forum to talk about findings from the study and on Ms. Martinez-Palacios described the paratransit ongoing work to create a directory in the event of a evaluation form that is being evaluated in-house. disaster.

4 Ms. Cortez also announced the County of Sonoma and passengers riding and how will it look for the was recently designated Aging and Disability rest of the year. Resource Connections (ADRC), in partnership with Dana Turrey briefly answered that there was the Disability Services and Legal Center. impacts to transit fund due to the absence of fares, Disability Services & Legal Center but also because much of the funding transit use is sales tax and gas tax based. Lake Kowell reported on the excitement to become an emerging ADRC and will work together Yuri Koslen added historically fare-free was used to develop a senior/disabled one-stop shop so one as toll to market transit. In this instance, it was has access to the services they need. utilized as social distance to limit contact between the driver and passenger. Ms. Kowell reported on financial assistance available to eligible individuals and on disaster Mr. Koslen also added that reintroducing fares also preparation materials for those who may need it. helps address social distancing issues as there were passengers riding transit for no specific Petaluma People Services reason other than for the ride. Lauren Garibaldi reported on the I Ride driver Tim Webster commented that the reintroduction program. Not all rides are able to be filled at this of fare is an added burden to those who point due to a decrease in volunteer drivers. benefitting from the free fares and asked about the Petaluma People Services (PPS) continues to decision to start fare collection. deliver 130 meals per week and are continuing to Mr. Koslen responded that there is a desire to look for more volunteer drivers. address social distancing and added the Clipper Ms. Garibaldi added that PPS will provide rides to START program has a 20% off of fares for low- vaccine sites, however there has not been any income individuals. There are other free programs requests at this time. that will remain: veterans, SRJC students, eligible Sebastopol Senior Center paratransit riders can use fixed route free. Scotty Millay King reported there are about five Mr. Shelley commented on readers on drivers and are keeping up with ride requests. paratransit busses and asked about other means are available to pay the fare. Mr. King further reported on meal deliveries and “phone buddy” program. There is good work being April Pearson responded that Volunteer Wheels done. has an app - Hopthru - available where passengers can buy tickets as another option. 6. Public Comment Jon Gaffney added has a prepaid Tobias Weare, State Council on Developmental system that will be available on regional transit in Disabilities, commented on emergency backpack the future for those who wish to use it. Clipper 2.0 trainings with the Red Cross for those with is in discussion to be a part of paratransit vehicles, developmental disabilities. but probably will not be part of the launch given Dan Shelley expressed satisfaction with the the software. The goal will be to have Clipper on vaccination discussion, and asked during the paratransit. decreased ridership, was there any significant 7. Items for next agenda decrease in funding due to the absence of fares

5 Please contact Dana Turrey should there be any items of interest to be added to the March 16, 2021 agenda. 8. Other Business / Comments / Announcements N/A 9. Adjourn – ACTION The committee adjourned at 2:40 p.m.

6 A Primer on Vision Zero Advancing Safe Mobility for All

What is Vision Zero?

Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries among all road users, and to ensure safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all. First implemented in Sweden in the 1990s, where traffic deaths have been cut in half even while the number of trips increased, Vision Zero is gaining momentum across the globe, including in many U.S. communities.

Each year in the U.S., more than 40,000 people — an average of 100 people per day — are needlessly killed, and millions more are injured, in traffic crashes. While often referred to as “accidents,” the reality is that we can prevent these tragedies by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety as a public health issue.

Changing the Status Quo - A New Vision for Safety

Vision Zero starts with the ethical belief that everyone has the right to move safely in their communities, and that system designers and policy makers share the responsibility to ensure safe systems for travel.

The Vision Zero approach recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related policies should be designed to ensure those inevitable mistakes do not result in severe injuries or fatalities. This means that system designers and policymakers are expected to improve the roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. 7 What a Commitment to Vision Zero Means Vision Zero is not a slogan, not a tagline, not even just a program. It is a fundamentally different way to approach traffic safety. Communities that want to succeed at Vision Zero need to acknowledge that business as usual is not enough and that systemic changes are needed to make meaningful progress. Effective communities will recognize and commit to core Vision Zero principles and strategies.

Committing to Vision Zero will take the following strategies: » Building and sustaining leadership, collaboration, and accountability – especially among a diverse group of stakeholders to include transportation professionals, policymakers, public health officials, police, and community members;

» Collecting, analyzing, and using data to understand trends and potential disproportionate impacts of traffic deaths on certain populations;

» Prioritizing equity and community engagement;

» Managing speed to safe levels; and

» Setting a timeline to achieve zero traffic deaths and serious injuries, which brings urgency and accountability, and ensuring transparency on progress and challenges.

Key among Vision Zero priorities are managing speed, centering equity, and engaging the community.

Managing Speed Speeding kills more than 10,000 people each year in the U.S. – on par with drunk driving – yet, the act of speeding does not carry the same social consequences as drunk driving. Vision Zero calls on communities to prioritize safe speeds through safe street design, automated speed enforcement (or safety cameras), and setting safe speed limits.

Centering Equity Safe mobility is a basic right, and Vision Zero is based on the premise that all people have the right to move about safely. Vision Zero communities should invest in proven safety strategies with a focus on ensuring equity. This includes identifying communities or populations that are disproportionately impacted by traffic deaths and serious injuries, and prioritizing roadway safety investments in these areas. It also means that if police are involved in Vision Zero, the community should make a public commitment to fair and equitable enforcement and ensure transparency and accountability on this commitment.

Engaging Communities When it comes to experience and knowledge of how a neighborhood works, no one knows better than the people who live there. Assessing which needs are greatest requires complementing a data-driven approach with robust community engagement. The Vision Zero Network recommends working with and supporting community based organizations who have established trust and relationships with residents.

Find out more about Vision Zero and the nonprofit advocacy work of the Vision Zero Network at www.visionzeronetwork.org. 8

Staff Report

To: Transit Paratransit Coordinating Committee Meeting Date: 3/16/21 From: Dana Turrey, Senior Transportation Planner Item Number: 4.0 Subject: Coordinated Claim for Transit Funding for FY 2021/2022

Consent Item: ☐ Regular Item: ☒ Action Item: ☒ Report: ☐

Issue Shall the TPCC recommend SCTA adoption of the Coordinated Claim for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 (FY 21/22) state and local transit funding? Recommendation Staff requests that the TPCC review the attached FY 21/22 Coordinated Claim and make a recommendation to the SCTA. Advisory Committee Recommendation The Transit Technical Advisory Committee will make a recommendation on this item prior to the TPCC meeting. Executive Summary Each year SCTA develops and adopts a Coordinated Claim for Transportation Development Act (TDA), State Transit Assistance (STA), and Measure M funds. These funds are the primary source of operating revenue for all of Sonoma County’s transit operators. The Coordinated Claim documents inter-jurisdictional funding agreements for transit services in Sonoma County as they relate to the distribution of these fund sources. Funding in the Coordinated Claim is calculated based on the latest fund estimates prepared by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the County Auditor’s office, and on previously established agreements for allocating funding among the transit operators. Financial Implications Is there a fiscal impact? Yes ☒ No ☐ Is there funding in the current budget? Yes ☒ No ☐ Transportation Development Act (TDA), State Transit Assistance The funding source(s) to be used are: (STA), and Measure M

411 King Street, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov 9 Background The revenue streams from TDA, STA, and Measure M sources are affected by changes in the economy, as well as changes in legislation and programs; thus, operators must be prepared for some instability in funding. While the fund estimates used to develop the Coordinated Claim are subject to fluctuation over the course of the fiscal year, the Coordinated Claim serves as the basis from which transit operators base their annual TDA and STA funding requests to MTC. Transit operators generally make their annual claims to MTC in May and June, so that funding is received prior to the start of the new fiscal year. TDA TDA revenues are derived from sales tax receipts (0.25% of the state sales tax). In the Coordinated Claim, TDA funds as first divided among the jurisdictions by population. In general, most jurisdictions provide TDA funding to Sonoma County Transit for a variety of contract transit services. A complete listing of all contracted services are documented in the Coordinated Claim. Based on a contribution formula established in FY 96/97, all Sonoma County entities contribute to Golden Gate Transit (GGT). Collectively, as required by MTC resolution 2858, these contributions provide an amount equal to 25% of Sonoma County’s fiscal year TDA funds. In order to fund complementary paratransit services required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, each entity that contracts with Sonoma County Transit contributes an additional 20% of their fixed- route contributions to support ADA required paratransit services. Currently, Sonoma County Transit contracts with Volunteer Wheels to provide its ADA paratransit service. Petaluma Transit and Santa Rosa CityBus currently contract with MV Transportation to provide paratransit services within their respective service areas. TDA funds can also be used for non-transit purposes if MTC makes a finding that “all transit needs which are reasonable to meet are being met” in those jurisdictions claiming funds for other purposes. In 2001, SCTA recognized the increased need for paratransit services and continuing unmet transit needs, and determined that use of TDA funds for non-transit purposes be phased out by 2002 (Resolution 2001-008). STA STA funds are derived from a portion of sales tax revenues collected from the sale of vehicle fuels, and are allocated from two subcategories: i) Population-Based Funds are distributed through a County Block Grant for local transit. ii) Revenue-Based Funds are allocated to operators eligible for TDA Article 4: Sonoma County Transit, Santa Rosa CityBus, Petaluma Transit, Golden Gate Transit, and SMART. In FY 18/19, under the new Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) policy framework, SCTA became responsible for coordinating the development of an STA Population-Based distribution program to STA- eligible operators in Sonoma County through a County Block Grant. This new policy framework coincided with the augmentation of the STA program through Senate Bill 1 (SB-1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, which increased the diesel sales tax. In FY 19/20, the SCTA adopted the following framework for distribution of the STA population-based funding for a period of five years.

10 1) An off the top portion of the funding is distributed to SMART based on their combined share of transit ridership and revenue hours (hours of operation), weighting each factor at 50%. In the proposed FY 21/22 Coordinated Claim, this portion makes up 10.03% of the total STA population-based funds. 2) Eighty percent of the funding is distributed among Petaluma Transit, Santa Rosa CityBus, and Sonoma County Transit based on their share of countywide population. 3) The remaining amount is distributed among Petaluma Transit, Santa Rosa CityBus, and Sonoma County Transit based on their combined share of local bus transit ridership and hours of operation (revenue hours), weighting each factor at 50%. In the proposed FY 21/22 Coordinated Claim, this portion makes up 9.97% of the total STA population-based funds. Measure M Measure M revenues are also derived from sales tax receipts (0.25% of Sonoma County sales tax) with bus transit receiving 10% of the incoming revenue. Measure M is administered by SCTA. Measure M funds are generally used by local operators to support fixed-route and paratransit operations. Measure M funds for local bus transit are divided among Sonoma County Transit, Santa Rosa CityBus, and Petaluma Transit based on population. Supporting Documents Proposed FY 2021/2022 Coordinated Claims for Transit in Sonoma County

11 Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim FY 2022 TDA, STA & Fiscal Year 2021-22 Measure M Summary Updated: DRAFT - 03-09-2021

FY 2021-22 TDA / STA / Measure M - Fund Summary 1.5

TDA STA* MEASURE M Total TDA / STA / MEASURE M

Forecasted Revenue: $26,600,000 100.00% $6,986,101 $3,990,000 100.00% $37,576,101 100.00%

MTC Contributions: 931,000 3.50% ------931,000 2.48% County Administration (Auditor) 45,000 0.17% ------45,000 0.12% Article 3 - Bicycle & Pedestrian Projects 512,480 1.93% ------512,480 1.36%

FY 2020-21 Funds to Transit Operators $25,111,520 94.40% $6,986,101 100.00% $3,990,000 100.00% $36,087,621 96.04%

Petaluma Transit 1,957,543 7.80% 581,500 8.32% 333,852 8.37% 2,872,895 7.96% Santa Rosa CityBus 6,769,936 26.96% 1,740,700 24.92% 936,854 23.48% 9,447,490 26.18% Sonoma County Transit* 10,146,160 40.40% 2,421,681 34.66% 1,389,294 34.82% 13,957,137 38.68% Golden Gate Transit 6,237,880 24.84% ------6,237,880 17.29% SMART ------2,242,220 32.10% 1,330,000 33.33% 3,572,220 9.90% Totals by Funding Source $25,111,520 100.00% $6,986,101 100.00% $3,990,000 100.00% $36,087,622 100.00% % by Funding Source 69.58% 19.36% 11.06% 100.00%

* includes distribution of Block-Grant and Revenue-Based funds

Sonoma County Coordinated Claim FY 2021-22 Summary 12 Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim FY 2022 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Updated: DRAFT - 02-18-2021 TDA

I. TDA Funds Available 1.5 SCTA Adopted Coordinated Adopted FY 2021 TDA Estimate: $26,300,000 Claim Distribution Revised FY 2021 TDA Estimate (1-2021): $25,800,000 FY 2021-22 FY 2020-21 Auditor's FY 2022 Estimate: $26,600,000 TDA Forecast $26,600,000 $26,300,000 Less: MTC Administration 133,000 131,500 % Change- FY 2021 Adopted Estimate MTC Planning 798,000 789,000 vs. FY 2022 Auditor's Estimate: 1.14% County Administration 45,000 45,000 Subtotal: 25,624,000 25,334,500 Less: Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Funding (2.0%) 512,480 506,690 Total: Article 4 and 8 available $25,111,520 $24,827,810

II. Distribution of TDA Funds A. Distribution by Apportionment Area

FY 2021-22 FY 2020-21 Area Population* Percent Apportionment Apportionment Difference

Cloverdale 9,213 1.8688% $469,294 $459,042 $10,252 Cotati 7,533 1.5281% 383,718 392,693 (8,975) Healdsburg 12,089 2.4522% 615,792 619,908 (4,116) Petaluma 61,873 12.5508% 3,151,700 3,086,746 64,954 Rohnert Park 43,069 8.7365% 2,193,858 2,149,124 44,734 Santa Rosa 173,628 35.2201% 8,844,300 8,709,011 135,289 Sebastopol 7,745 1.5711% 394,516 391,007 3,509 Sonoma 11,050 2.2415% 562,867 573,047 (10,180) Windsor 28,248 5.7300% 1,438,903 1,416,501 22,402 County 138,532 28.1009% 7,056,572 7,030,732 25,840

Total 492,980 100.0000% $25,111,520 $24,827,811 $283,709

* Department of Finance - January 1, 2020 - Based on published population by entity - Table E-1.

B. Funds allocated to Golden Gate Transit for regional transit services:

FY 2021-22 FY 2020-21 Area Distribution Allocation Allocation

Cloverdale 10.22220% $47,972 $47,207 Cotati 29.02375% 111,369 112,199 Healdsburg 10.22220% 62,947 62,334 Petaluma 29.02375% 914,742 911,840 Rohnert Park 29.02375% 636,740 633,961 Santa Rosa 25.00000% 2,211,075 2,242,985 Sebastopol 10.22220% 40,328 40,240 Sonoma 10.22220% 57,537 58,866 Windsor 10.22220% 147,088 145,020 County 29.02375% 2,048,082 2,070,514 Total $6,277,880 $6,325,166 25.00% of County TDA

Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim Page 1 of 4 13 Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim FY 2022 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Updated: DRAFT - 02-18-2021 TDA 1.5

C. Contribution to Sonoma County Transit for intercity services between Petaluma and Santa Rosa: (Sonoma County Transit Routes 44 & 48)

FY 2021-22 Percent of Fixed-Route Paratransit Area Route Budget* Allocation Allocation**

Petaluma 14.64% $232,846 (1) $46,569

* Cotati and Rohnert Park contributions to Sonoma County Transit Routes 44 & 48 are included in Section D. (1) - includes contribution for maintenance of the ** Assumes 20% of fixed-route contribution for ADA complementary paratransit services. Petaluma Transit Mall.

D. Funds allocated to support intercity Sonoma County Transit/Paratransit services:

FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 Total 80% 20% Percent Total 80% 20% Area Contribution Fixed Route Paratransit of TDA Contribution Fixed Route Paratransit

Cotati $224,289 $179,431 $44,858 Remainder $217,402 $173,922 $43,480 Sebastopol 175,838 140,670 35,168 Remainder 176,824 141,459 35,365 Healdsburg 358,310 286,648 71,662 Remainder* 352,089 281,671 70,418 Cloverdale 285,168 228,134 57,034 Remainder* 292,727 234,182 58,545 Windsor 917,575 734,060 183,515 Remainder 933,042 746,434 186,608 Rohnert Park 594,345 475,476 118,869 Remainder 616,046 492,837 123,209 Sonoma 256,432 205,146 51,286 Remainder 244,105 195,284 48,821 Total $2,811,957 $2,249,566 $562,391 $2,832,235 $2,265,788 $566,447

E. Other contract services between apportionment areas:

FY 2021-22 Claiming FY 2020-21 Area Contribution Agency Purpose Contribution

Cloverdale Total FR * PT $128,594 County $127,144 Cloverdale* 102,875 County Local Route 68 101,715 Cloverdale** 25,719 County Local Paratransit Contribution** 25,429 County County 96,711 Santa Rosa Support for Operations 113,109 Golden Gate Transit Golden Gate Transit 40,000 Santa Rosa Support for Santa Rosa Transit Mall Operations 39,493 Cotati Total FR * PT 54,947 County 54,327 Cotati* 43,957 County Local Routes 10 & 11 43,462 Cotati** 10,989 County Local Paratransit Contribution** 10,865 Healdsburg 200,755 County 198,491 Healdsburg* 160,604 County Local Route 67 158,793 Healdsburg** 40,151 County Local Paratransit Contribution** 39,698 Rohnert Park FR & PT Total 941,072 County 930,458 Rohnert Park* 752,857 County Local Routes 10,11,12,14 744,366 Rohnert Park** 188,214 County Local Paratransit Contribution** 186,092 Sebastopol FR & PT Total 177,364 County 175,364 Sebastopol* 141,891 County Local Route 24 140,291 Sebastopol** 35,473 County Local Paratransit Contribution** 35,073 Sonoma FR & PT Total 261,225 County 258,279 Sonoma* 208,980 County Local Routes 32 & 34 206,623 Sonoma** 52,245 County Local Paratransit Contribution** 51,656 Windsor FR & PT Total 358,773 County 354,727 Windsor* 287,019 County Local Route 66 *** 283,782 Windsor** 71,755 County Local Paratransit Contribution** 70,945

* Contributions assume a 1.14% change over FY 2020-21 (from page 1). ** Assumes 20% of fixed-route contribution for ADA complementary paratransit services. *** Includes contribution for maintenance of the Windsor Intermodal Facility.

Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim Page 2 of 4 14 Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim FY 2022 Fiscal Year 2021-22 Updated: DRAFT - 02-18-2021 TDA

1.5

F. Paratransit Contributions

See paratransit contributions detailed in Section II, C,D,E and summarized in Section III column F.

Prior-Year Revenue Adjustment*

*Prior year revenue adjustments are reflected in "Prior Year TDA Funds Available" on page 4. Balances are in accordance with MTC's Regional Fund Estimate dated February 24, 2021.

IV. Distribution of TDA Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Funds FY 2021-22

Area Population Apportionment

Cloverdale 1.8688% $9,577 Cotati 1.5281% 7,831 Healdsburg 2.4522% 12,567 Petaluma 12.5508% 64,320 Rohnert Park 8.7365% 44,773 Santa Rosa 35.2201% 180,496 Sebastopol 1.5711% 8,051 Sonoma 2.2415% 11,487 Windsor 5.7300% 29,365 County 28.1009% 144,012 Total 100.0000% $512,480

Article 3 Summary

Projected FY 2021-22 Apportionment $512,480

- Other

FY 2021-22 Article 3 Funds Available for Distribution 512,480

Projected Prior-Year Fund Balance* 760,570

Total Article 3 Funds Available $1,273,050

* Per MTC Regional Fund Estimate 02-24-2021. Article 3 claimants should confirm their prior-year balance with SCTA prior to submitting a claim to MTC.

Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim Page 3 of 4 15 Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim FY 2022 TDA & Fiscal Year 2021-22 Measure M Summary Updated: DRAFT - 02-18-2021

III. Summary of TDA Fund Activity 1.5

A. B. C/D. E. +/- F. Projected Projected FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 Prior-Year TDA Total TDA TDA Contributions Contributions Contract Contributions to TDA Funds Funds Agency Apportionment to GGT to SCT Services SC Paratransit Entitlement** Available* Available

Cloverdale $469,294 ($47,972) ($234,182) ($102,875) ($84,264) $0 $0 $0 Cotati 383,718 (111,369) (173,922) (43,957) (54,470) 0 0 0 Healdsburg 615,792 (62,947) (281,671) (160,604) (110,569) 0 0 0 Petaluma 3,151,700 (914,742) (232,846) ---- (46,569) 1,957,543 1,855,831 3,813,374 Rohnert Park 2,193,858 (636,740) (492,837) (752,857) (311,424) 0 0 0 Santa Rosa 8,844,300 (2,211,075) ---- 136,711 ---- 6,769,936 6,915,952 13,685,888 Sebastopol 394,516 (40,328) (141,459) (141,891) (70,838) 0 0 0 Sonoma 562,867 (57,537) (195,284) (208,980) (101,066) 0 0 0 Windsor 1,438,903 (147,088) (746,434) (287,019) (258,363) 0 0 0 County 7,056,572 (2,048,082) 2,498,634 1,601,473 1,037,562 10,146,160 6,305,988 16,452,148 GGT ---- 6,277,880 -- (40,000) -- 6,237,880 1,545,442 7,783,322 Total $25,111,520 $25,111,520 $16,623,213 $41,734,733

* From MTC's Regional Fund Estimate dated 02-24-2021. Claimants should confirm prior-year balances with MTC prior to submitting a claim for prior-year funds.

Measure M Transit Distribution

FY 2021-22 TDA Forecast $26,600,000 FY 2021-22 Measure M Forecast $26,600,000

Measure M Distribution to Transit (19%) $5,054,000 - Distribution for Bicycle & Pedestrian Projects (4%) 1,064,000 - Distribution to SMART (5%) - Capital 1,330,000 - Distribution to Transit Operators (10%) 2,660,000

Distribution to Transit Operators based on TDA Population Percentages Distribution

Petaluma Transit 12.5508% 333,852 Santa Rosa CityBus 35.2201% 936,854 Sonoma County Transit 52.2291% 1,389,294 Total 100.0000% $2,660,000

Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim Page 4 of 4 16 Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim Attachment "A" Fiscal Year 2021-22 Updated: DRAFT - 02-18-2021

Consolitated Summary of TDA Claims by Eligible Operator 1.5

G. H. I. A. B. Distribution C/D. E. +/- F. Projected Coordinated Projected Projected FY 2021-22 Initial FY 2021-22 Percent FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 Claim Prior-Year TDA Total TDA TDA Distribution Contributions after GGT Contributions Contract Contributions to TDA Distribution Funds Funds Apportionmen Area / Claimant Apportionment Percent to GGT Subtotal Contribution to SCT Services SC Paratransit Entitlement Percent Available* Available

Petaluma - Petaluma Transit 3,151,700 12.55% (914,742) 2,236,958 8.91% (232,846) ---- (46,569) 1,957,543 7.80% 1,855,831 3,813,374 Santa Rosa - Santa Rosa CityBus 8,844,300 35.22% (2,211,075) 6,633,225 26.42% ---- 136,711 ---- 6,769,936 26.96% 6,915,952 13,685,888 County - Sonoma County Transit 13,115,520 52.23% (3,152,064) 9,963,456 39.68% 232,846 (96,711) 46,569 10,146,160 40.40% 6,305,988 16,452,148 GGT - Golden Gate Transit ------6,277,880 6,277,880 25.00% ---- (40,000) ---- 6,237,880 24.84% 1,545,442 7,783,322 Total $25,111,520 100.00% $25,111,520 100.00% $25,111,520 100.00% $16,623,213 $41,734,733

* From MTC's Regional Fund Estimate dated 02-24-2021. Claimants should confirm prior-year balances with MTC prior to submitting a claim for prior-year funds.

Claim Summary by Apportionment Area - FY 2021-22 TDA Funds

Sonoma Petaluma Santa Rosa County FY 2021-22 Apportionment Apportionment Apportionment TDA Claimant Area Area Area*** Entitlement

Petaluma - Petaluma Transit 1,957,543 1,957,543 Santa Rosa - Santa Rosa CityBus 6,673,225 96,711 6,769,936 County - Sonoma County Transit 279,415 9,866,745 10,146,160 GGT - Golden Gate Transit 914,742 2,171,075 3,152,064 6,237,880 Total by Apportionment Area $3,151,700 $8,844,300 $13,115,520 $25,111,520

Sonoma County TDA Coordinated Claim Attachment "A" 17 Sonoma County STA Coordinated Claim Fiscal Year 2021-22 STA Updated 03-09-2021

FY 2021-22 - Block Grant Funds* 1.5

Funds Available $4,832,768 100.00%

A. Performance-Based Distribution to SMART for $484,856 10.03% Regional Rail Service

B. Population-Based Distribution to Bus Transit $3,866,214 80.00% Operators

C. Performance-Based Distribution to Bus Transit $481,697 9.97% Operators

* Year three of a five-year distribution agreement established in FY 2019-20.

A. Performance-Based Distribution to SMART for Regional Rail Service Portion of Ridership and Revenue Hours in Sonoma County Combined % 50% Ridership/ Available for Operator Ridership % Ridership Revenue Hours % Revenue Hours 50% Revenue Distribution

SMART 469,232 12.90% 20,240 7.16% 10.03% $484,856.32 Total $484,856

B. Population-Based Distribution to Bus Operators

Available for Operator Population* % Population Distribution

Petaluma Transit 61,873 12.55% $485,241 Santa Rosa CityBus 173,628 35.22% $1,361,684 Sonoma County Transit 257,479 52.23% $2,019,289 Total 492,980 100.00% $3,866,214

C. Performance-Based Distribution to Bus Transit Operators

Combinded % 50% Ridership/ Available for Operator Ridership % Ridership Revenue Hours % Revenue Hours 50% Revenue Distribution

Petaluma Transit 349,280 11.03% 27,593 10.51% 10.77% $51,889 Santa Rosa CityBus 1,851,967 58.48% 101,527 38.69% 48.58% $234,028 Sonoma County Transit 965,635 30.49% 133,298 50.80% 40.64% $195,780 Total 3,166,882 100.00% 262,418 100.00% 100.00% $481,697

Summary of FY 2020-21 Distribution of STA Funds - by Operator

STA Block-Grant Funds STA Revenue-Based Funds Total STA Funds A. Distribution for B. Bus Operator C. Bus Operator Total Funds for Regional Population-Based Performance-Based Available for Available for Available for Operator Rail Service Distribution Distribution Distribution* Distribution Distribution Petaluma Transit $485,241 $51,889 $537,130 $44,370 * $581,500 Santa Rosa CityBus $1,361,684 $234,028 $1,595,713 $144,987 * $1,740,700 Sonoma County Transit $2,019,289 $195,780 $2,215,069 $206,612 * $2,421,681 SMART $484,856 $484,856 $1,757,364 *+ $2,242,220 Total $484,856 $3,866,214 $481,697 $4,832,768 $2,153,333 $6,986,101

* Includes prior-year carrover funds available. + SMART STA Revenue-Based Funds are systemwide, not dedicated to service in Sonoma County

Sonoma County STA Coordinated Claim FY 2021-22 18