DOCSLIB.ORG

See a Comparison of All Bay Area Transit Operators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
See a Comparison of All Bay Area Transit Operators Bay Area Public Transit Agencies Page 1 of 2 Farebox Service Average age Primary Transit Brand(s) Year Annual Annual Cost per Organization Governing Board Counties of Contract Governing Transit Agency Transit Types1 Recovery Area1 of the active fleet5 Formed1 Ridership2 Cost3 Passenger1 Type1 Structure1 Operation1 Service1 (link to agency website) Ratio4 (sq miles) (years) Muni Bus, trolley bus, light Bus 11.4, Light Rail 18.0, 7-member appointed San Francisco and San Francisco Municipal rail, historic streetcar, 1912 223,701,000 $665 million 29% $2.72 Municipal transit agency 49 sq mi - Trolleybus 13.5, Cable Car board under the MTA San Mateo Transportation Agency cable car, paratransit 105.4, Street Car Rail 74.5 BART Alameda, Contra East Bay Paratransit Transit district created 9-member elected San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Heavy rail 1972 126,603,000 $557 million 73% $4.40 Costa, San Francisco 2,073 sq mi Consortium (ADA) 15.7 by state legislature board of directors District and San Mateo contracts with Veolia AC Transit, Dumbarton Alameda, Contra Express Transit district created 7-member elected Bus, paratransit 1960 55,235,000 $300 million 17% $5.44 Costa and San 364 sq mi 8.3 Alameda-Contra Costa Transit by state legislature board of directors Francisco District VTA 12 voting members, 6 Bus, light rail, Transit district created Santa Clara and San 10.8 (Bus 9.3, Light Rail Santa Clara Valley Transportation 1972 44,244,000 $298 million 12% $7.11 alternate members and 1,290 sq mi - paratransit by state legislature Mateo 11.7) Authority 3 non-voting members Caltrain 3 representatives from San Francisco, San Amtrak (service and Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Heavy rail 1992 15,596,000 $112 million 58% $7.19 Joint powers authority each of the JPB member Mateo and Santa 425 sq mi 21.7 maintenance) Board agencies Clara SamTrans Transit district created 9-member board of San Mateo and San Bus, paratransit 1975 12,446,000 $100 million 17% $8.04 448 sq mi MV Transportation 8.6 San Mateo County Transit District by state legislature directors Francisco Golden Gate Transit, Marin Bridge District Bridge, Highway and 19-member board of Transit6 Bus, ferry boat Marin County and 1928, Marin 9,203,000 $100 million 23% $10.65 Transit District, directors, 7-member 160 sq mi - Bus 7.7, Ferry 24.0 Golden Gate Bridge Highway & service, paratransit San Francisco Transit 1964 County transit district board of directors Transportation District The County Connection 11-member board, with Central Contra Costa Transit Bus, paratransit 1980 3,297,000 $26 million 17% $7.92 Joint Powers Authority city and county Contra Costa 180 sq mi - 8.2 Authority representatives Santa Rosa CityBus City Council (7-member Bus, paratransit 1958 2,809,000 $10 million 19% $3.54 Municipal transit agency Sonoma 51 sq mi - 9.4 City of Santa Rosa elected council) Tri Delta Transit Transit Authority is a 11-member board of Eastern Contra Costa Transit Bus, paratransit 1977 2,741,000 $16 million 18% $6.02 Contra Costa 225 sq mi First Transit 12.7 joint powers agency directors Authority Wheels 7-member board of Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Bus, paratransit 1986 1,727,000 $14 million 12% $8.05 Transit authority Alameda 40 sq mi MV Transportation 8.3 directors Authority Municipal Transit SolTrans Solano County Transit Solano and Contra Bus 3.3, Commuter bus Bus, paratransit 2011 1,394,000 $9 million 37% $6.46 Agency 65 sq mi MV Transportation Solano County Transit Board of Directors Costa 10.0 Joint Powers Authority Veolia Transportation Sonoma County Transit Sonoma County Board Bus, paratransit 1958 1,361,000 $11 million 19% $7.87 County transit agency Sonoma 390 sq mi and Volunteer Center 6.9 County of Sonoma of Supervisors of Sonoma County WestCAT 7-member board of Bus 10.6, Commuter bus Western Contra Costa Transit Bus, paratransit 1977 1,282,000 $7.5 million 25% $5.85 Transit authority Contra Costa 38 sq mi MV Transportation directors 10.0 Authority Bay Area Public Transit Agencies Page 2 of 2 Farebox Service Average age Primary Transit Brand(s) Year Annual Annual Cost per Organization Governing Board Counties of Contract Governing Transit Agency Transit Types1 Recovery Area1 of the active fleet5 Formed1 Ridership2 Cost3 Passenger1 Type1 Structure1 Operation1 Service1 (link to agency website) Ratio4 (sq miles) (years) Placer, Sacramento, Partnership among the Capitol Corridor Yolo, Solano, Contra local transit agencies in Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Heavy Rail 1998 1,250,0007 $30 million n/a n/a Joint Powers Authority Costa, Alameda, San n/a - n/a the 8-county service Authority/BART Francisco, and Santa area Clara Fairfield and Suisun Transit Solano, Yolo and (FAST), Solano Express Bus, paratransit 1975 1,049,000 $9 million 24% $8.38 Municipal transit agency 5 City Council members Sacramento (intercity 41 sq mi MV Transportation 7.4 City of Fairfield connections) Altamont Commuter Express San Joaquin, (ACE) 6-member appointed Heavy Rail 1998 940,000 $16 million 37% $16.76 Regional transit agency Alameda, and Santa 1,248 sq mi - 12.4 San Joaquin Regional Rail board of directors Clara Commission San Francisco Bay Ferry San Francisco, Public Transportation Water Emergency Transportation Ferry boat service 2007 607,000 $24 million 48% $9.43 Board of Directors Alameda, Solano and 79 sq mi Blue & Gold Fleet 12.5 Agency Authority San Mateo Napa County VINE Transportation & Bus 6.0, Commuter bus Napa County Transportation and Bus, paratransit 1974 550,000 $6 million 11% $11.62 Transit agency Solano 83 sq mi - Planning Agency 2.3 Planning Agency (NCTPA) City Coach Bus, paratransit 1981 508,000 $2 million 22% $3.25 Municipality City council Napa 27 sq mi - 5.5 City of Vacaville Union City Transit 5-member elected City Bus, paratransit 1974 505,000 $3 million 15% $6.19 Municipal transit agency Alameda 18 sq mi MV Transportation 5.6 City of Union City Council Petaluma Transit Division of City of Bus, paratransit 1976 318,000 $1.1 million 17% $3.67 City Council Sonoma 13 sq mi - 4.7 City of Petaluma Petaluma Municipal transit division Rio Vista Delta Breeze Bus, paratransit 1978 13,000 $0.5 million 13% $34.99 within the city's Public 5-member City Council Solano 7 sq mi - n/a City of Rio Vista Transit Services Works Department SMART Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit Heavy Rail 2002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a (Sonoma and Marin) n/a n/a n/a District (San Francisco, San California High Speed Rail Heavy Rail 1996 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mateo and Santa n/a n/a n/a California High Speed Rail Authority Clara) 1 Source: Statistical Summary of Bay Area Transit Operators, MTC, July 2014 (available online: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/library/statsum/statsum.htm). 2 Total of all adult, youth and student, senior and disabled, inter-operator paid transfer, and non-revenue boarding. Rounded to nearest 1000th. Source: Statistical Summary of Bay Area Transit Operators, MTC, July 2014 (http://www.mtc.ca.gov/library/statsum/statsum.htm) 3 Total expenses from operations, vehicle maintenance, non-vehicle maintenance, general administration, adjustments, direct costs for providing charter services, and all vehicle lease costs. Excludes depreciation and amortization expenses. The cost includes all modes except Paratransit. Source: Statistical Summary of Bay Area Transit Operators, MTC, July 2014 (http://www.mtc.ca.gov/library/statsum/statsum.htm). 4 The ratio includes all modes except Paratransit. Source: Statistical Summary of Bay Area Transit Operators, MTC, July 2014 (available online: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/library/statsum/statsum.htm). 5 Source: Transit Agency Profiles, National Transit Database, 2013 (available online: http://www.ntdprogram.gov). 6 Marin Transit is a Transit Agency that funds the operation of some Golden Gate Transit buses and the West Marin Stage (sic) system. 7 Ridership for entire 170-mile service, not only Bay Area segment. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SFO to San Francisco in 45 Minutes for Only $6.55!* in 30 Minutes for Only $5.35!*
    Fold in to the middle; outside right Back Panel Front Panel Fold in to the middle; outside left OAK to San Francisco SFO to San Francisco in 45 minutes for only $6.55!* in 30 minutes for only $5.35!* BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) from OAK is fast, easy and BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) provides one of the world’s inexpensive too! Just take the convenient AirBART shuttle Visitors Guide best airport-to-downtown train services. BART takes you bus from OAK to BART to catch the train to downtown San downtown in 30 minutes for only $5.35 one-way or $10.70 Francisco. The entire trip takes about 45 minutes and costs round trip. It’s the fast, easy, inexpensive way to get to only $6.55 one-way or $13.10 round trip. to BART San Francisco. The AirBART shuttle departs every 15 minutes from the The BART station is located in the SFO International Terminal. 3rd curb across from the terminals. When you get off the It’s only a five minute walk from Terminal Three and a shuttle at the Coliseum BART station, buy a round trip BART 10 minute walk from Terminal One. Both terminals have ticket from the ticket machine. Take the escalator up to the Powell Street-Plaza Entrance connecting walkways to the International Terminal. You can westbound platform and board a San Francisco or Daly City also take the free SFO Airtrain to the BART station. bound train. The BART trip to San Francisco takes about 20 minutes. Terminal 2 (under renovation) Gates 40 - 48 Gates 60 - 67 Terminal 3 Terminal 1 Gates 68 - 90 Gates 20 - 36 P Domestic Want to learn about great deals on concerts, plays, Parking museums and other activities during your visit? Go to www.mybart.org to learn about fantastic special offers for BART customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenn Transit Service Short Range Transit Plan
    Glenn Transit Service Short Range Transit Plan Final Report Prepared for Glenn Transit Service Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1 Introduction and Key Study Issues ............................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Study Issues ........................................................................................................ 1 2 Study Area Characteristics ......................................................................................... 3 Review of Previous Studies and Projects ...............................................................18 3 Review of Existing Transit Services ............................................................................21 Glenn Transit Services .........................................................................................21 Other Transit Providers .......................................................................................32 4 Public Outreach ........................................................................................................39 Introduction .......................................................................................................39 Stakeholder Interviews ........................................................................................39 Information Booths .............................................................................................41
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland
    B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan
    SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Short-Range Transit Plan Fiscal Years 2017 – 2026 May 3, 2017 Acknowledgements San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors 2017 Rose Guilbault, Chair Charles Stone, Vice Chair Jeff Gee Carole Groom Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Karyl Matsumoto Dave Pine Josh Powell Peter Ratto Senior Staff Michelle Bouchard, Chief Operating Officer, Rail Michael Burns, Interim Chief Officer, Caltrain Planning / CalMod April Chan, Chief Officer, Planning, Grants, and Transportation Authority Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO Kathleen Kelly, Interim Chief Financial Officer / Treasurer Martha Martinez, Executive Officer, District Secretary, Executive Administration Seamus Murphy, Chief Communications Officer David Olmeda, Chief Operating Officer, Bus Mark Simon, Chief of Staff Short Range Transit Plan Project Staff and Contributors Douglas Kim, Director, Planning Lindsey Kiner, Senior Planner, Planning David Pape, Planner, Planning Margo Ross, Director of Transportation, Bus Transportation Karambir Cheema, Deputy Director ITS, Bus Transportation Ana Rivas, South Base Superintendent, Bus Transportation Ladi Millard, Director of Budgets, Finance Ryan Hinchman, Manager Financial Planning & Analysis, Finance Donald G. Esse, Senior Operations Financial Analyst, Bus Operations Leslie Fong, Senior Administrative Analyst, Grants Tina Dubost, Manager, Accessible Transit Services Natalie Chi, Bus Maintenance Contract Administrator, Bus Transportation Joan Cassman, Legal Counsel (Hanson Bridgett) Shayna M. van Hoften, Legal Counsel (Hanson
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of GGT TRANSIT GUIDE Effective Date
    goldengate.org/alerts GOLDEN Follow us: ® Social icon Circle Only use blue and/or white. For more details check out our Brand Guidelines. ® GATE TRANSIT GUIDE SCHEDULE INFORMATION JUNE 13 - SEPTEMBER 11 SUMMER 2021 CUSTOMER SERVICE Monday – Friday 7am – 6pm CLOSED weekends and the following holidays: New Year’s, Presidents’, Memorial, Independence, Labor, Thanksgiving, and Christmas days call 511 toll free TDD 711 (say “Golden Gate Transit,” then “operator”) Para obtener más información en español, vea la página 8. Other languages call: 415.455.2000 Welcome Welcome to Golden Gate Transit Bus Security Notice and Ferry System! Unattended items on buses, ferries or at ter- Golden Gate Transit has been operating bus and minals may be subject to immediate disposal. ferry service since 1970 as a service of the Golden Golden Gate Bus and Golden Gate Ferry are Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District not responsible for items left in terminals, (District), which also maintains and operates the aboard ferry vessels or buses. Golden Gate Bridge. Golden Gate Transit is subsi- dized by toll revenues from the Golden Gate Bridge, In Case of Emergency by collection of fares, and to the extent available, If an emergency occurs, GGT works closely federal and state grants. The District does not have with Bay Area media to provide up-to-date authority to levy a tax. service information. Tune radios to local news stations KCBS (740 AM) or KGO (810 AM). Bus operators may be authorized to announce Golden Gate Transit the status of GGT operations. is
    [Show full text]
  • SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE As of 12-11-2020
    SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE as of 12-11-2020 December 8, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Bay Area transit systems continue to struggle in the face of dramatically reduced ridership and revenues due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This challenge was already the most significant crisis in the history of public transportation, and now it has persisted far longer than any of us would have predicted. Since the beginning, our workers have been on the front lines, doing their jobs as essential workers, responsible for providing other front line workers with a way to safely travel to and from essential jobs. Now that the availability of a vaccine is on the horizon, we are proud to echo the attached call from the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU). Specifically, we urge you to work to ensure that transit, paratransit, and school transportation workers are prioritized along with other essential workers to receive the vaccine following the critical need to vaccinate the State’s healthcare workers. Even with reduced ridership, an average of 8 million monthly riders continue to depend on Bay Area transit services. These riders are the healthcare workers, grocery clerks, caregivers, emergency services personnel and others doing the critical work that has kept California functioning during the pandemic. They cannot continue to do so without access to reliable public transportation, and are therefore dependent on the health of the transit workers that serve them every day. Our agencies have worked hard to ensure the public health of riders and transit workers during this crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Use This Timetable: Locate the Time Point ( a ) on the Map Prior to Where You Want to Board the Bus
    ROUTE Downtown San Francisco Connect to 397 397 B A Muni, AC Transit & BART/Caltrain Connection Golden Gate Transit C B Effective 1/10/16rev A Main Southbound Beale 1 st passengers Fares Potrero boarding at B a Sunnydale/ y Local Out of SF s Market h o San Francisco r Bayshore only e Cash Cash C 9 th • Main/Folsom 10 pay the Local th Adult ...................... $2.25 $4.00 st Brisbane • Mission/1 11 Fare. Age 19 – 64 Old County MissionHoward th Brisbane Folsom • 11th/Market Potrero Youth ...................... $1.10 $1.10 D Park & Ride Age 18 and younger Brisbane Grand • Park & Ride Airport Baden E Eligible Discount .... $1.10 $1.10 Airport Age 65+, disabled & Medicare cardholder South San Francisco South San Francisco (proof of eligibility or identity required) San Francisco Int’l Airport San Francisco Millbrae Newbridge Children McDonnell F International Airport th Two children (age 4 and younger) ride free with each 5 Bay • Millbrae Transit Center G Millbrae Connect to K L adult or eligible discount farepaying passenger. Transit Center BART Middlefield Burlingame Millbrae Millbrae VA Medical Additional children subject to youth fare. N Center El Camino Real w H lo San Mateo il W E San Mateo y W ersit Local Day passes are available. iv • Hillsdale Caltrain n S Hillsdale U For more info, visit www.samtrans.com/daypass Burlingame Caltrain Station or call SamTrans at 1-800-660-4287 San Carlos Burlingame Webster I Lytton Tasso • Caltrain Alma Use Clipper® and receive a discount. Hillsdale San Carlos M High Legend Caltrain Station Redwood CIty Discounted tokens available for purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • December 8, 2020 the Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State Of
    December 8, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Bay Area transit systems continue to struggle in the face of dramatically reduced ridership and revenues due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This challenge was already the most significant crisis in the history of public transportation, and now it has persisted far longer than any of us would have predicted. Since the beginning, our workers have been on the front lines, doing their jobs as essential workers, responsible for providing other front line workers with a way to safely travel to and from essential jobs. Now that the availability of a vaccine is on the horizon, we are proud to echo the attached call from the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU). Specifically, we urge you to work to ensure that transit, paratransit, and school transportation workers are prioritized along with other essential workers to receive the vaccine following the critical need to vaccinate the State’s healthcare workers. Even with reduced ridership, an average of 8 million monthly riders continue to depend on Bay Area transit services. These riders are the healthcare workers, grocery clerks, caregivers, emergency services personnel and others doing the critical work that has kept California functioning during the pandemic. They cannot continue to do so without access to reliable public transportation, and are therefore dependent on the health of the transit workers that serve them every day. Our agencies have worked hard to ensure the public health of riders and transit workers during this crisis. We coordinated to develop the Riding Together: Bay Area Healthy Transit Plan, which includes a baseline set of measures aimed at minimizing virus transmission on our systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Statement to Bay Area Regional Government
    ~1t1!trm./ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT Latham Square Building· 508 Sixteenth Street, Oakland, California 94612 • Telephone 654-7878 April 11, 1968 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Joint Committee on Bay Area Regional Government STATEMENT BY ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District was created in 1956 by a vote of the electorate in the East Bay. The enabling statute I the IITransi t District Law," ,..,.as adopted by the Legislature in 1955 after a long period of study and agonizing over the transit service offered by the Key System Transit Lines. As early as 1950 a report was issued to the Mayors and City Managers of the cities of the East Bay, recommending that a public agency be created to take over and operate a transit system in the East Bay. In 1953, after the disasterous 76-day Key System strike, the cities and counties of the East Bay fashioned the legislation which eventually resulted in the creation of the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit Districto Two-thirds of the cities in the originally proposed area of the District had to vote in favor of placing the matter on the ballot. The electorate in an equal number of cities in the proposed district had to vote in favor of creating the District. The Board of Directors of the District are directly elected by the voters, two at-large and five from wards evenly dis­ tributed throughout the district. The voters of the district approved a bond issue in 1959, permitting the District to purchase facilities from Key System Transit Lines and to commence operations in 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • AC Transit) for Easypass Program 2021 to 2025
    Page 1 of 5 Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR December 15, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Dee Williams-Ridley, City Manager Submitted by: Liam Garland, Director, Department of Public Works Subject: Contract: Alameda-Contra Costa County Transit District (AC Transit) for EasyPass Program 2021 to 2025 RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract and any amendments with Alameda-Contra Costa County Transit District (AC Transit) for the EasyPass bus transit pass program for City of Berkeley employees in an amount not to exceed $774,453 for the five-year period commencing January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION Total projected five-year cost of the EasyPass program is $774,453. Funds for calendar year 2021 are available in the Payroll Deduction Trust Fund (Fund 013), and future fiscal years funding is subject to appropriation in those annual budgets. Based upon the current estimated minimum pool of 1,402 passes (one pass per employee), the City will remit payment to AC Transit over the life of the contract as projected here: Contract Period Minimum Annual Cost Total Annual Employee Pool Per Pass Contract Costs1 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2021 1,402 $106.15 $148,826 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2022 1,402 $106.15 $148,826 1/1/2022 - 12/31/2023 1,402 $110.48 $154,891 1/1/2023 - 12/31/2024 1,402 $114.80 $160,955 1/1/2024 - 12/31/2025 1,402 $114.80 $160,955 Total $774,453 1 Calculation of total annual contract costs is based upon AC Transit’s level of service score allocated to every COB worksite (approximately 30 as of October 2020), combined into a weighted average that is then multiplied by minimum pool of participants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Transit Innovations (GTI) Data System
    TRANSIT SERVICE FREQUENCY APP: A Global Transit Innovations (GTI) Data System Final Report Yingling Fan Humphrey School of Public Affairs University of Minnesota CTS 18-24 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. CTS 18-24 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date TRANSIT SERVICE FREQUENCY APP: A Global Transit November 2018 Innovations (GTI) Data System 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Yingling Fan, Peter Wiringa, Andrew Guthrie, Jingyu Ru, Tian He, Len Kne, and Shannon Crabtree 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Humphrey School of Public Affairs University of Minnesota 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 301 19th Avenue South 295E Humphrey School Minneapolis MN 55455 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Center for Transportation Studies Final Report University of Minnesota 14. Sponsoring Agency Code University Office Plaza, Suite 440 2221 University Ave SE Minneapolis, MN 55414 15. Supplementary Notes http://www.cts.umn.edu/Publications/ResearchReports/ 16. Abstract (Limit: 250 words) The Transit Service Frequency App hosts stop- and alignment-level service frequency data from 559 transit providers around the globe who have published route and schedule data in the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) format through the TransitFeeds website, a global GTFS clearinghouse. Stop- and alignment-level service frequency is defined as the total number of transit routes and transit trips passing through a specific alignment segment or a specific stop location. Alignments are generalized and stops nearby stops aggregated. The app makes data easily accessible through visualization and download tools.
    [Show full text]