DOCSLIB.ORG

Carlsbad Village Double Track Final Draft EA for Publication.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carlsbad Village Double Track Final Draft EA for Publication.Pdf Environmental Assessment for thet Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Prepared for Prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment for the Carlsbad Village Double Track Project prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. 304 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 April 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Project Purpose and Need......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Applicable Regulations and Permits ........................................................................................... 1-4 2.0 ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Criteria for Evaluating Alternatives ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Evaluated Alternatives ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.4 Alternatives Dismissed .............................................................................................................. 2-8 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION ........................................................ 3.1-1 3.1 Aesthetic and Scenic Resources ............................................................................................ 3.1-1 3.2 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................ 3.2-1 3.3 Biological Resources and Wetlands ........................................................................................ 3.3-1 3.4 Community Impacts and Environmental Justice/Section VI ...................................................... 3.4-1 3.5 Cultural and Historical Resources ........................................................................................... 3.5-1 3.6 Geology/Soils .................................................................................................................. 3.6-1 3.7 Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste .................................................................................. 3.7-1 3.8 Hydrology/Floodplains ............................................................................................................ 3.8-1 3.9 Land Use, Zoning, and Property Acquisitions .......................................................................... 3.9-1 3.10 Noise and Vibration .............................................................................................................. 3.10-1 3.11 Parks and Recreational Areas .............................................................................................. 3.11-1 3.12 Public Health and Safety ..................................................................................................... 3.12-1 3.13 Relocation Impacts .............................................................................................................. 3.13-1 3.14 Water Quality and Water Resources .................................................................................... 3.14-1 3.15 Section 4(f) and 6(f) Evaluation ............................................................................................ 3.15-1 3.16 Construction Impacts ........................................................................................................... 3.16-1 3.17 Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................................................. 3.17-1 4.0 COORDINATION AND CONSULTATION ............................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Agency Coordination ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Public Outreach ..................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2 Public Outreach ..................................................................................................................... 4-2 5.0 DISTRIBUTION LIST .............................................................................................................................. 5-1 6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ........................................................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................... 7-1 Carlsbad Village Double Track Project i April 2018 Environmental Assessment Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) List of Figures Figure No. Page 1-1 Regional Location .......................................................................................................................... 1-5 1-2 Project Location ............................................................................................................................. 1-6 2-1 Area of Potential Effect (APE) ........................................................................................................ 2-3 2-2 Tamarack Signal Work Area ........................................................................................................... 2-6 3.1-1 Viewpoint Locations .................................................................................................................... 3.1-3 3.1-2 Viewpoint 1 with Photosimulation................................................................................................. 3.1-4 3.1-3 Viewpoint 2 with Photosimulation................................................................................................. 3.1-5 3.1-4 Viewpoint 3 with Photosimulation................................................................................................. 3.1-6 3.1-5 Viewpoint 4 with Photosimulation................................................................................................. 3.1-7 3.3-1 Wet Season Protocol Sample Areas ............................................................................................ 3.3-7 3.3-2 Biological Impacts ..................................................................................................................... 3.3-11 3.5-1 Direct and Indirect Effects APE.................................................................................................... 3.5-2 3.9-1 Existing Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 3.9-9 3.10-1 Allowable Increase in Cumulative Noise Levels for Land Use Categories 1 and 2 ....................... 3.10-2 3.10-2 Sensitive Land Uses: Clusters R1 to R7 .................................................................................... 3.10-8 3.10-3 Sensitive Land Uses: Clusters R8 to R10 ................................................................................... 3.10-9 3.10-4 Sensitive Land Uses: Clusters R11 to R14 and I-1 ................................................................... 3.10-10 3.12-1 Emergency Service Locations ................................................................................................... 3.12-2 3.15-1 Land Evaluated for 4(f) Eligibility ............................................................................................... 3.15-3 3.15-2 Section 6(f) Resources .............................................................................................................. 3.15-7 3.17-1 Cumulative Projects .................................................................................................................. 3.17-4 3.17-2 Adjacent Cumulative Projects .................................................................................................... 3.17-5 List of Tables Table No. Page 3.2-1 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards ......................................................................... 3.2-1 3.2-2 Ambient Air Quality Summary ...................................................................................................... 3.2-6 3.2-3 Estimated Annual Construction Air Pollutant Emissions ................................................................ 3.2-9 3.2-4 Estimated Annual Construction GHG Emissions ........................................................................ 3.2-10 3.3-1 Vegetation Types
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • MTS San Diego Trolley NCTD Coaster NCTD Sprinter
    Media Platforms Advertising Programs For Every Budget • Admedia Enclosures • 3’x4’ Advertising Signs • Station Domination Programs VendSight • Floor Graphics are available upon request. No minimum number of units required. • Wallscapes Graphics design services are available. • Transit Guide Advertising-Print • Bluetooth advertising • Product Sampling AdMedia rental units available at select locations. Units available for product displays, promotions, sampling or job recruitment. Call for details. Station domination programs available. Call for details. Public Transportation Advertising Throughout San Diego County Turn Key Vending Management Services Available Call For Details MTS San Diego Trolley NCTD Coaster NCTD Sprinter Floor Graphics Triangle Kiosks Sampling Programs Contact: VendSight (619) 562-1486 • 1-877-426-6748 www.vendsight.com Contact: VendSight (619) 562-1486 • 1-877-426-6748 www.vendsight.com VendSight oers an unprecedented reach to public transportation consumers throughout San Diego County. The Coaster The Sprinter 50 Available Admedia Enclosures 50 Available Admedia Enclosures • Downtown San Diego to Oceanside • 50 3’x4’ Advertising Signs San Diego Trolley • 50 3’x4’ Advertising Signs • Station Domination Programs 100 AdMedia Enclosures along the San Diego Trolley lines. • Station Domination Programs • Floor Graphics • Floor Graphics • Wallscapes 3’ x 4’ xes signs • San Ysidro-Downtown • Wallscapes • Transit Guide Advertising-Print • Blue Line, Green Line, Orange Line San Diego County is home to 53 cities and 2.9 • Transit Guide Advertising-Print Destinations Include: • Bluetooth advertising • Gaslamp, Old Town, San Diego State, million people. San Diego County is ranked as • Bluetooth advertising • Product Sampling Print advertising also available the 2nd largest city in California with the 16th Del Mar Fairgrounds, Downtown Qualcomm, San Ysidro Border Mission Valley, largest population of all metropolitan cities in • Product Sampling PetCo Park, San Diego Convention Center, America.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment for thet Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Prepared for Prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment for the Carlsbad Village Double Track Project prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. 304 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 April 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Project Purpose and Need......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Applicable Regulations and Permits ........................................................................................... 1-4 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study
    City of Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Part of the Coastal Mobility & Livability Study Approved by Resolution 2018-18 February 14, 2018 Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Executive Summary The Rail Corridor Vision Study (RCVS) is the Public Visioning Activities: Early in the centerpiece of the Coastal Mobility and Livability study, the public was invited to discuss issues Study (CMLS), a broad effort to examine mobility and opportunities in the corridor via five in- issues and opportunities in the Encinitas coastal person workshops, nine “pop-up” workshops rail corridor. This unique corridor is centered at community events, outreach to City around the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis commissions, and an eight-week online Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail Corridor and parallel roads comment period through the PlaceSpeak Coast Highway 101 and Vulcan Avenue/San Elijo website. Avenue. Public Open House Reviews: Later in the The RCVS has a broad focus, coordinating study, two “open house” public forums multiple infrastructure elements to create a unified presented and collected public feedback on vision for the rail corridor with both near-term and proposed improvements and priorities. long-term objectives. Community members Guiding Policies and stakeholders drove At the study’s kickoff, the project team developed the following policies to guide the study and the study’s process and inform its technical and engagement activities: conclusions. Increase east-west connections Improve pedestrian & bicycle facilities Technical Support Group: A committee of representatives from agencies with interest in Provide adequate parking the coastal corridor advised the project team Balance mobility improvements with desired and helped define the study’s parameters and community character constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2004-2008 Regional Short-Range Transit Plan Technical
    FY 2004-2008 REGIONAL SHORT- RANGE TRANSIT PLAN TECHNICAL APPENDIX June 2004 INTRODUCTION The SRTP is the five-year plan that balances the short-term needs of maintaining and optimizing existing services, while beginning to implement the long-term transit vision identified in MOBILITY 2030. This technical appendix supports the SRTP with additional documentation on the existing transit system, including operating data used to perform various analyses. Specifically, the technical appendix includes: Appendix A – Who We Are: Description of MTS, NCTD, and SANDAG Appendix B – Existing Transit Services and Programs: Details of existing system Appendix C – FY 2004 Performance Improvement Program (PIP): Contains program description and Performance Improvement Recommendations (PIRs) of each operator Appendix D – FY 2003 Route Operating Statistics: Route-level statistics of all MTS and NCTD routes Appendix E – Historical Operating Statistics: Annual operator-level statistics from past to present Appendix F – FY 2003 Title VI Compliance: Annual update of Title VI assessment Appendix G – Transit/Land Use Memorandum of Understanding: Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) between various jurisdictions Appendix H – North County Transit District Service Implementation Plan FY2005-FY2010: Future service plans of NCTD TABLE OF CONTENTS _______________________________________________ APPENDIX A: WHO WE ARE ...................................................................................................A-1 APPENDIX B: EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES AND PROGRAMS........................................B-1
    [Show full text]
  • LOSSAN Coastal Rail Corridor Today
    Building LOSSAN Coastal Rail Corridor Today. San Diego Segment Projects | NORTH Boarding Tomorrow. San Diego Our Goal: County Line 1 Double track More Tracks CAMP 2 PENDLETON 99% More Trains LOSSAN Coastal Rail Corridor 3 of the 60-mile San Diego County rail segment More Efficient BY 2050 Travel Completed Projects 1 San Mateo Creek Bridge Replacement Completed in February 2012 Camp Pendleton 4 6 Santa Margarita 2 San Onofre Bridge Replacements River Bridge Replacement 3 North Green Beach Bridge Replacement Completed in March 2014 San Onofre to Pulgas 8 San Luis Rey 4 Double Track, Stage 1 Transit Center Completed in February 2014 Add 4.2 miles of double track in 5 Camp Pendleton and replace Oceanside Double Track rail bridge. 10 Completed in February 2009 Est. Cost: $37.7 million Est. Completion: Late 2015 12 South Carlsbad Double Track Completed in February 2012 San Onofre to Pulgas 5 Double Track, Stage 2 Add 1.6 miles of double track in Camp Pendleton. Est. Cost: $25.3 million Est. Completion: TBD Oceanside OCEANSIDE North Oceanside Double Track 7 Add one mile of double track between 6 Oceanside Harbor and Pier View Way, and replace the San Luis Rey River bridge. Est. Cost: $55.9 million Est. Completion: TBD 7 8 Oceanside Transit Center 9 Oceanside Station C A M Add third rail track, platform, and 9 crossovers at Oceanside Transit Center. Est. Cost: $21.8 million Est. Completion: Early 2017 10 Buena Vista Carlsbad Lagoon 11 Carlsbad Village Station C A Carlsbad Village Double Track 11 Add one mile of double track through Carlsbad Village Station and new bridge across the Buena Vista Lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • DEL MAR LA JOLLA PACIFIC OCEAN CARLSBAD OCEANSIDE 101 Oceanside to V.A./UCSD Via Highway
    101 Oceanside to V.A./UCSD via Highway 101 M-F • SA • SU • H Destinations/Destinos • Carlsbad State Beach • Coast Hwy. SPRINTER Station • Del Mar Fairgrounds & Racetrack • University of California, • Cedros Design District, Solana San Diego Beach • V.A. Medical Center • Birch Aquarium • Scripps Green Hospital • Salk Institute Oceanside Transit Center LEGEND/Leyenda 302, 303, 313, 318, 392, 395, Map not to scale/Mapa no está a escala SPRINTER, COASTER, Amtrak, Oceanside Blvd. Route/Ruta Metrolink, Greyhound, RTA 202 Street/Calle Weekday a.m./p.m. Coast Hwy. Peak Period Only/ SPRINTER Station Servicio mañanas y tardes 302, 318, SPRINTER durante horas pico solamente Carlsbad Village (within 2 blocks) OCEANSIDE Time Point/Punto de Tiempo Station Landmark/Señal Carlsbad Blvd. 325, COASTER Transfer/Transbordo Cannon CARLSBAD COASTER Station/ Palomar Airport Rd. Estaciones del COASTER Carlsbad Poinsettia SPRINTER Station/ (COASTER Station Station Estaciones del SPRINTER located within 2 blocks of Breakwater Rd.) 444, 445, 446, Highway 101 373 FLEX, COASTER Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas Station 304, 309, 374 FLEX, COASTER Swami’s Beach T Gilman Transit Center 30, 41, 150, 201, Lomas Santa Fe 202, 237, 921 Fletcher Cove Beach Park T MTS 30, 41, 150, 921 Solana Beach Station Via De La Valle Pangea Genesee 308, 374 FLEX, COASTER, Amtrak Del Mar North Torrey Pines Thornton UCSD Hospital 15th Fairgrounds T MTS 30 DEL MAR North Torrey Pines VA Medical Center La Jolla La Jolla Village Torrey Pines Shores Scholars State Reserve Nobel Lebon Westeld UCSD Birch Villa La Jolla La Jolla UTC Scripps Green Aquarium Village Square PACIFIC OCEAN Hospital V.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region
    San Diego Association of Governments TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014 DRAFT TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN EconomicTHE Context SAN Report DIEGO REGION San Diego Regional TOD Strategy DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014October 15, 2014 PREPARED FOR: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prepared for: PREPARED BY: SANDAG AECOM REGIONAL TOD STRATEGY Fashion Valley Transit Center in the 1980s. Flickr / SDMTS: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdmts/13441171155/ TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION: CONTEXT REPORT III SANDAG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Context of Transit-Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region ........................ 1 2 Setting a Foundation for the Future of Transit-Oriented Communities .................... 5 3 Population, Employment, and Housing Growth in the San Diego Region ������������� 13 4 Regional Transit System and Access to Employment ............................................. 27 5 Local Market Readiness and Development Prototypes .......................................... 47 6 Types of Transit-Oriented Communities ................................................................. 59 7 Trends and Considerations ................................................................................... 67 8 Building a Toolbox ................................................................................................ 73 9 Example TOD Projects in the San Diego Region .................................................... 75 APPENDICES A Description
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Pendleton Oceanside
    San Luis Rey Transit Center to Rancho Del Oro SPRINTER Station via Douglas Dr. 311 Carlsbad Village Station a 14 Area/College Blvd. Estación de SPRINTER M-F Destinations/Destinos • Vista Community Clinic • El Camino High School • Mission San Luis Rey L-V • Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School • Ocean Ranch Corporate Centre 315 !Ä CAMP !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä PENDLETON !Ä San Luis Rey !Ä !Ä ! !Ä Transit Center !Ä 303, 309, Ä t ! f i !Ä 313, 315 r g e d n a !Ä V!Ä s la !Ä !Ä iver ug N R Do !Ä !Ä !Ä Colleg !Ä e !Ä ! 309 313 !Ä 315 !Ä N River 303 ! 303 !Ä Target s ! a l g OCEANSIDE u 313 o e D ze Pala ra !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä F !Ä Walmart !Ä !Ä !Ä ! s la Mission San 309 !Ä s ! g u o t o Luis Rey i Ä !Ä l ! ! D ! o 303, 309 n b io r n s Ä io s A ! ss !Ä i Mi ! M s !Ä o !Ä !Ä L !Ä !Ä ! !Ä ! !Ä C o !Ä !Ä !Ä !Ä l !Ä ! le ! g e F ! Albertsons !Ä ir !Ä e !Ä si de Public !Ä !Ä Library !Ä Ä ho !Ä ! anc 315 309 R ia !Ä l Ä V !Ä a ! ! !Ä e 303 R Ä ! o sa n 323 i e n !Ä io ! !Ä MLK M s m is a El Camino 313 M C MS l ! E HS !Ä !Ä Legend/Leyenda !Ä 313 ean Ranch a Oc lat Route 311/Ruta 311 !Ä P ! VA La !Ä e Ä ! Avenida D BREEZE System/Sistema BREEZE ! Clinic South ! Select Trips/Viajes Selectos North !Ä COASTER/SPRINTER Oceanside Blvd !Ä Street/Calle !Ä 318 Time Point/Punto de Tiempo ! Rancho Del Oro Christa Paradas SPRINTER Station Stops/ McAuliffe Landmark/Punto de Referencia ES SPRINTER Transfer/Transbordo 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 140 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Rider’s Guide | EFFECTIVE April 4, 2021 San Luis Rey Transit Center to Rancho Del Oro SPRINTER Station via Douglas Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Setting
    2.0 Environmental Setting 2 Chapter 2 Environmental Setting 2.1 Regional Setting The City of Encinitas (City) is located in San Diego County, approximately 35 miles north of the United States–Mexico border in southern California. A regional reference map is provided in Figure 2-1. The City is roughly 20 miles north of downtown City of San Diego and 95 miles south of Los Angeles. The jurisdictions that surround the City include: on its north side, the City of Carlsbad; on its south side, the City of Solana Beach; and on the east side, the County of San Diego (San Dieguito Planning Area). 2.2 Project Location The City comprises approximately 13,328 total acres of land within the Planning Area. The Planning Area includes the City’s incorporated limits and Sphere of Influence (SOI), and is characterized by cliffs, coastal beaches, flat topped coastal areas, rolling hills, and steep mesa bluffs in northern San Diego County. The City lies within the Coastal Zone along 6 miles of Pacific Coastline, bordered by Batiquitos Lagoon to the north and San Elijo Lagoon to the south. As shown in Figure 2-2, the project area includes the City’s five distinct communities. The project area is generally accessed by Coast Highway 101 (Highway 101) and Interstate 5 (I- 5), both of which run north–south in the western portion of the project area. Major east– west connectors in the project area include Leucadia Boulevard, Encinitas Boulevard, Santa Fe Drive, and Manchester Avenue. City of Encinitas Housing Element Update EIR Page 2-1 CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CO
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Security Review of North County Transit District (Nctd )
    2009 ANNUAL SECURITY REVIEW OF NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD ) RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY SECTION RAIL TRANSIT AND CROSSING BRANCH CONSUMER PROTECTION AND SAFETY DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 April 28, 2009 (Public) Richard W. Clark, Director Consumer Protection and Safety Division 447621 2009 ANNUAL SECURITY REVIEW OF NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Section (RTSS) staff conducted this system security program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting review and inspection activities include: Georgetta Gregory – Rail Transit Crossings Branch Program Manager April Mulqueen – Program and Project Supervisor Anton Garabetian – Senior Utilities Engineer Joey Bigornia - RTSS Representative to NCTD Howard Huie – Utilities Engineer Dain Pankratz – Utilities Engineer Christopher Poschl – Public Utilities Regulatory Analyst 447621 Table of Contents Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 2 3 NCTD BACKGROUND 4 4 REVIEW PROCEDURE 7 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS* 8 APPENDICES A. Acronyms List 11 B. NCTD 2009 Security Review Checklist Index* 13 C. NCTD 2009 Security Review Recommendations List* 14 D. NCTD 2009 Security Review Checklists* 15 * These sections are included in attachment B and contains Sensitive Security Information (SSI) that is controlled under 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520. No part of this record may be disclosed to persons without a “need to know” as defined in 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520, except with the written permission of the Administrator of the transportation security Administration or the secretary of Transportation. Unauthorized release may result in civil penalty or other action. For U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • California Rail Passenger Program Report 1993/94 - 2002/03
    .... ..__ ··•· .. -· ...,._ -- California Rail Passenger Program Report I 1993/94 - 2002/03 - -········-~=,~ ·~ ~~-2:: ==~.;::;;;;::;.~____.........,._.._==~--=·,..,. .·•· ·.· ;~---. • ...•. ·:·.• . ..-' ...,~ ' ' ·.:.;,_• ·~· , . ,, _ State of California ·· · · .. · Department of Transportation !Ji' . December 1993 fim""""n~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY J>ETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001 (916) 654-5267 FAX (916) 654-6608 TDD (916) 654-4014 March 1, 1994 Members, California Legislature State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Members: This transmits the California Rail Passenger Program Report 1993/94 - 2002/03. Section 14036 of the Government Code requires the Department to produce a five-year Rail Passenger Development Plan every other year. Caltrans is producing this ten-year California Rail Passenger Program Report, which includes all of the information required by Section 14036 for the five-year plan, in order to provide an extended planning horizon for rail passenger service in California. The Report examines passenger rail transportation in California. The Report reviews the current operations of State-supported intercity rail passenger service and outlines the Department's ten-year plan for intercity service for the period 1993/94 through 2002/03 for capital improvements and service expansions. Also, for the first time the State's rail report includes a summary of current operations and expansion programs for all forms of passenger rail: intercity, commuter and urban. Chapter V - The State Intercity Rail Capital Program displays a ten-year program of capital improvement projects to upgrade and expand the three State-supported intercity routes. The program totals $1.2 billion, of which 77 percent has identified funding sources.
    [Show full text]