Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study City of Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Part of the Coastal Mobility & Livability Study Approved by Resolution 2018-18 February 14, 2018 Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Executive Summary The Rail Corridor Vision Study (RCVS) is the Public Visioning Activities: Early in the centerpiece of the Coastal Mobility and Livability study, the public was invited to discuss issues Study (CMLS), a broad effort to examine mobility and opportunities in the corridor via five in- issues and opportunities in the Encinitas coastal person workshops, nine “pop-up” workshops rail corridor. This unique corridor is centered at community events, outreach to City around the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis commissions, and an eight-week online Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail Corridor and parallel roads comment period through the PlaceSpeak Coast Highway 101 and Vulcan Avenue/San Elijo website. Avenue. Public Open House Reviews: Later in the The RCVS has a broad focus, coordinating study, two “open house” public forums multiple infrastructure elements to create a unified presented and collected public feedback on vision for the rail corridor with both near-term and proposed improvements and priorities. long-term objectives. Community members Guiding Policies and stakeholders drove At the study’s kickoff, the project team developed the following policies to guide the study and the study’s process and inform its technical and engagement activities: conclusions. Increase east-west connections Improve pedestrian & bicycle facilities Technical Support Group: A committee of representatives from agencies with interest in Provide adequate parking the coastal corridor advised the project team Balance mobility improvements with desired and helped define the study’s parameters and community character constraints. Promote health and safety City Council & Commissions Check-Ins: The project team briefed the City Council on Stakeholder & Public the study’s progress at key milestones— including an interactive workshop to review Engagement proposed improvements—and presented to a wide range of City commissions. The RCVS relied heavily on input from community stakeholders and members of the public, including: Key Takeaways from Coastal Mobility & Livability Working Public Engagement Group (CMLWG): The core stakeholder team representing broad community interests The public engagement activities significantly presided over all elements of the RCVS and informed the RCVS process and CMLS, meeting frequently to review technical recommendations, yielding the following key work and provide guidance. takeaways: ES 1 February 14, 2018 Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Develop a long-term vision that fully resolves Near-Term Vision: Crossings, the community’s concerns regarding the rail corridor, but also focuses on short-term Quiet Zone & Active improvements that can provide more Transportation immediate benefits. The RCVS included a variety of solutions to Implement a citywide quiet zone for trains at improve mobility and quality of life in the near all vehicular at-grade crossings. term: Construct new pedestrian/bicycle crossings of the rail corridor to improve east-west Rail Corridor Crossing Policy: A connectivity. prerequisite to implementing new rail corridor crossings is developing a policy to guide their Enhance the safety and desirability of selection and design. The crossing policy pedestrian and bicycle facilities through sound ultimately envisions quarter-mile spacing design ideas that provide a high-quality user between crossings, with initial priorities experience and is sensitive to the surrounding focused on creating crossings every half mile; environment. serving the highest-activity areas; and equitably distributing new crossings among Proposed communities. Rail Corridor Crossing Locations: The Improvements study recommends a total of 21 crossings spanning the six-mile corridor: Several categories of access improvements are envisioned, aimed at improving both east-west ▪ Eight existing crossings, most of which connectivity across the corridor as well as north- include recommendations for additional south connectivity along the corridor. While pedestrian/bicycle improvements. establishing a long-term vision was a key part of ▪ Three new undercrossings already in the study, the project team and stakeholders also progress, at El Portal Street, Verdi developed a set of improvements to deliver Avenue, and the San Elijo Gateway community benefits in the near term. location near the Solana Beach city limit. ▪ Ten new crossings, with the specific Long-Term Vision: Trenching or location and type of crossing (at-grade or Moving the Rail Corridor grade-separated) to be determined during the context-sensitive design process at The CMLWG and other stakeholders largely each location: agreed on two potential long-term solutions for the ▪ Bishop's Gate Road rail corridor. These are considered long-term ▪ Grandview Street/Hillcrest Drive solutions because the cost of these improvements makes them potentially infeasible, or at least not ▪ Sanford Street/Jupiter Street implementable in the foreseeable future. ▪ Phoebe Street/Glaucus Street Trench: Lower the grade of the railroad tracks ▪ Daphne Street/Basil Street in Leucadia and Cardiff-by-the-Sea to create a ▪ Marcheta Street/Orpheus Avenue covered, or partially covered, trench. ▪ A Street/Sunset Drive Move to Interstate 5 (I-5) Corridor: Move the ▪ H Street/I Street entire rail corridor into the I-5 right-of-way. ▪ Birmingham Drive ▪ Norfolk Drive/Dublin Drive ES 2 February 14, 2018 Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Citywide Quiet Zone: The study identified the context-sensitive design process for the initial steps to implement a citywide Quiet next highest-priority rail crossings at Sanford Zone to reduce train noise and preserve Street/Jupiter Street and Birmingham Drive. community character. The project team held Traffic Calming & Active Transportation diagnostic meetings with key regulatory Projects: Complete the citywide ATP agencies —including the Federal Railroad including identification of early-action projects. Administration (FRA), California Public Begin planning and design of highest-priority Utilities Commission (CPUC), and North ATP projects in close coordination with quiet County Transit District (NCTD)—and, as of zone and rail corridor crossing projects. January 2018, is currently developing concept designs for the required supplemental safety measures at three of the four vehicular at- Taken together, the RCVS proposed grade crossings. The safety measures for the improvements comprise an integrated, balanced fourth crossing at Chesterfield Drive are vision that was developed through an extensive, currently in construction and expected to be community-based process. The suite of complete by 2020. recommended projects will improve mobility and Traffic Calming: The study identified quality of life in the Encinitas coastal rail corridor opportunities for traffic calming that preserve in the near term and for decades to come. community character by reducing traffic speeds and promote pedestrian and bicycle usage, especially near crossing locations and along Vulcan Avenue and San Elijo Avenue. Coastal Rail Trail & Multi-Use Paths: The RCVS and ATP work efforts collaboratively developed a system of north-south paths in the corridor—including the regional Coastal Rail Trail—that increase separation from automobiles and integrate with citywide ATP networks. Next Steps The City Council’s adoption of this RCVS report will complete the study, and the next phases of project development and implementation are recommended as follows: Citywide Quiet Zone: Schedule follow-up meetings with regulatory agencies to finalize the scope of safety improvements. Identify funding for design, permitting, and construction of improvements. Rail Corridor Crossings: Continue the designs of the El Portal Street and Verdi Avenue pedestrian/bicycle undercrossings and allocate funding for the Verdi Avenue construction phase. Identify funding to begin ES 3 February 14, 2018 Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Contents Purpose & Guiding Policies ......................................................................................... 1 A Larger Effort for Coastal Mobility & Livability ....................................................................... 2 Guiding Policies ...................................................................................................................... 2 Process & Engagement ................................................................................................ 3 Coastal Mobility & Livability Working Group ............................................................................ 4 Public Engagement ................................................................................................................. 5 City & Agency Guidance ......................................................................................................... 6 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................... 7 Corridor Description ................................................................................................................ 7 Ongoing & Planned Projects ..................................................................................................10 Proposed Improvements ............................................................................................ 12 Long-Term & Near-Term
Recommended publications
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlsbad Village Double Track Final Draft EA for Publication.Pdf
    Environmental Assessment for thet Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Prepared for Prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment for the Carlsbad Village Double Track Project prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. 304 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 April 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Project Purpose and Need......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Applicable Regulations and Permits ........................................................................................... 1-4 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment for thet Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Prepared for Prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment for the Carlsbad Village Double Track Project prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. 304 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 April 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Project Purpose and Need......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Applicable Regulations and Permits ........................................................................................... 1-4 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2004-2008 Regional Short-Range Transit Plan Technical
    FY 2004-2008 REGIONAL SHORT- RANGE TRANSIT PLAN TECHNICAL APPENDIX June 2004 INTRODUCTION The SRTP is the five-year plan that balances the short-term needs of maintaining and optimizing existing services, while beginning to implement the long-term transit vision identified in MOBILITY 2030. This technical appendix supports the SRTP with additional documentation on the existing transit system, including operating data used to perform various analyses. Specifically, the technical appendix includes: Appendix A – Who We Are: Description of MTS, NCTD, and SANDAG Appendix B – Existing Transit Services and Programs: Details of existing system Appendix C – FY 2004 Performance Improvement Program (PIP): Contains program description and Performance Improvement Recommendations (PIRs) of each operator Appendix D – FY 2003 Route Operating Statistics: Route-level statistics of all MTS and NCTD routes Appendix E – Historical Operating Statistics: Annual operator-level statistics from past to present Appendix F – FY 2003 Title VI Compliance: Annual update of Title VI assessment Appendix G – Transit/Land Use Memorandum of Understanding: Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) between various jurisdictions Appendix H – North County Transit District Service Implementation Plan FY2005-FY2010: Future service plans of NCTD TABLE OF CONTENTS _______________________________________________ APPENDIX A: WHO WE ARE ...................................................................................................A-1 APPENDIX B: EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES AND PROGRAMS........................................B-1
    [Show full text]
  • DEL MAR LA JOLLA PACIFIC OCEAN CARLSBAD OCEANSIDE 101 Oceanside to V.A./UCSD Via Highway
    101 Oceanside to V.A./UCSD via Highway 101 M-F • SA • SU • H Destinations/Destinos • Carlsbad State Beach • Coast Hwy. SPRINTER Station • Del Mar Fairgrounds & Racetrack • University of California, • Cedros Design District, Solana San Diego Beach • V.A. Medical Center • Birch Aquarium • Scripps Green Hospital • Salk Institute Oceanside Transit Center LEGEND/Leyenda 302, 303, 313, 318, 392, 395, Map not to scale/Mapa no está a escala SPRINTER, COASTER, Amtrak, Oceanside Blvd. Route/Ruta Metrolink, Greyhound, RTA 202 Street/Calle Weekday a.m./p.m. Coast Hwy. Peak Period Only/ SPRINTER Station Servicio mañanas y tardes 302, 318, SPRINTER durante horas pico solamente Carlsbad Village (within 2 blocks) OCEANSIDE Time Point/Punto de Tiempo Station Landmark/Señal Carlsbad Blvd. 325, COASTER Transfer/Transbordo Cannon CARLSBAD COASTER Station/ Palomar Airport Rd. Estaciones del COASTER Carlsbad Poinsettia SPRINTER Station/ (COASTER Station Station Estaciones del SPRINTER located within 2 blocks of Breakwater Rd.) 444, 445, 446, Highway 101 373 FLEX, COASTER Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas Station 304, 309, 374 FLEX, COASTER Swami’s Beach T Gilman Transit Center 30, 41, 150, 201, Lomas Santa Fe 202, 237, 921 Fletcher Cove Beach Park T MTS 30, 41, 150, 921 Solana Beach Station Via De La Valle Pangea Genesee 308, 374 FLEX, COASTER, Amtrak Del Mar North Torrey Pines Thornton UCSD Hospital 15th Fairgrounds T MTS 30 DEL MAR North Torrey Pines VA Medical Center La Jolla La Jolla Village Torrey Pines Shores Scholars State Reserve Nobel Lebon Westeld UCSD Birch Villa La Jolla La Jolla UTC Scripps Green Aquarium Village Square PACIFIC OCEAN Hospital V.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region
    San Diego Association of Governments TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014 DRAFT TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN EconomicTHE Context SAN Report DIEGO REGION San Diego Regional TOD Strategy DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014October 15, 2014 PREPARED FOR: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prepared for: PREPARED BY: SANDAG AECOM REGIONAL TOD STRATEGY Fashion Valley Transit Center in the 1980s. Flickr / SDMTS: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdmts/13441171155/ TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION: CONTEXT REPORT III SANDAG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Context of Transit-Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region ........................ 1 2 Setting a Foundation for the Future of Transit-Oriented Communities .................... 5 3 Population, Employment, and Housing Growth in the San Diego Region ������������� 13 4 Regional Transit System and Access to Employment ............................................. 27 5 Local Market Readiness and Development Prototypes .......................................... 47 6 Types of Transit-Oriented Communities ................................................................. 59 7 Trends and Considerations ................................................................................... 67 8 Building a Toolbox ................................................................................................ 73 9 Example TOD Projects in the San Diego Region .................................................... 75 APPENDICES A Description
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Setting
    2.0 Environmental Setting 2 Chapter 2 Environmental Setting 2.1 Regional Setting The City of Encinitas (City) is located in San Diego County, approximately 35 miles north of the United States–Mexico border in southern California. A regional reference map is provided in Figure 2-1. The City is roughly 20 miles north of downtown City of San Diego and 95 miles south of Los Angeles. The jurisdictions that surround the City include: on its north side, the City of Carlsbad; on its south side, the City of Solana Beach; and on the east side, the County of San Diego (San Dieguito Planning Area). 2.2 Project Location The City comprises approximately 13,328 total acres of land within the Planning Area. The Planning Area includes the City’s incorporated limits and Sphere of Influence (SOI), and is characterized by cliffs, coastal beaches, flat topped coastal areas, rolling hills, and steep mesa bluffs in northern San Diego County. The City lies within the Coastal Zone along 6 miles of Pacific Coastline, bordered by Batiquitos Lagoon to the north and San Elijo Lagoon to the south. As shown in Figure 2-2, the project area includes the City’s five distinct communities. The project area is generally accessed by Coast Highway 101 (Highway 101) and Interstate 5 (I- 5), both of which run north–south in the western portion of the project area. Major east– west connectors in the project area include Leucadia Boulevard, Encinitas Boulevard, Santa Fe Drive, and Manchester Avenue. City of Encinitas Housing Element Update EIR Page 2-1 CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CO
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Security Review of North County Transit District (Nctd )
    2009 ANNUAL SECURITY REVIEW OF NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD ) RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY SECTION RAIL TRANSIT AND CROSSING BRANCH CONSUMER PROTECTION AND SAFETY DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 April 28, 2009 (Public) Richard W. Clark, Director Consumer Protection and Safety Division 447621 2009 ANNUAL SECURITY REVIEW OF NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Section (RTSS) staff conducted this system security program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting review and inspection activities include: Georgetta Gregory – Rail Transit Crossings Branch Program Manager April Mulqueen – Program and Project Supervisor Anton Garabetian – Senior Utilities Engineer Joey Bigornia - RTSS Representative to NCTD Howard Huie – Utilities Engineer Dain Pankratz – Utilities Engineer Christopher Poschl – Public Utilities Regulatory Analyst 447621 Table of Contents Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 2 3 NCTD BACKGROUND 4 4 REVIEW PROCEDURE 7 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS* 8 APPENDICES A. Acronyms List 11 B. NCTD 2009 Security Review Checklist Index* 13 C. NCTD 2009 Security Review Recommendations List* 14 D. NCTD 2009 Security Review Checklists* 15 * These sections are included in attachment B and contains Sensitive Security Information (SSI) that is controlled under 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520. No part of this record may be disclosed to persons without a “need to know” as defined in 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520, except with the written permission of the Administrator of the transportation security Administration or the secretary of Transportation. Unauthorized release may result in civil penalty or other action. For U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DEL MAR LA JOLLA PACIFIC OCEAN CARLSBAD OCEANSIDE 101 Oceanside to V.A./UCSD Via Highway
    101 Oceanside to V.A./UCSD via Highway 101 M-F • SA • SU • H Destinations/Destinos • Carlsbad State Beach • Coast Hwy. SPRINTER Station • Del Mar Fairgrounds & Racetrack • University of California, • Cedros Design District, Solana San Diego Beach • V.A. Medical Center • Birch Aquarium • Scripps Green Hospital • Salk Institute Oceanside Transit Center LEGEND/Leyenda 302, 303, 313, 318, 392, 395, Map not to scale/Mapa no está a escala SPRINTER, COASTER, Amtrak, Oceanside Blvd. Route/Ruta Metrolink, Greyhound, RTA 202 Street/Calle Weekday a.m./p.m. Coast Hwy. Peak Period Only/ SPRINTER Station Servicio mañanas y tardes 302, 318, SPRINTER durante horas pico solamente Carlsbad Village (within 2 blocks) OCEANSIDE Time Point/Punto de Tiempo Station Landmark/Señal Carlsbad Blvd. 325, COASTER Transfer/Transbordo Cannon CARLSBAD COASTER Station/ Palomar Airport Rd. Estaciones del COASTER Carlsbad Poinsettia SPRINTER Station/ (COASTER Station Station Estaciones del SPRINTER located within 2 blocks of Breakwater Rd.) 444, 445, 446, Highway 101 373 FLEX, COASTER Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas Station 304, 309, 374 FLEX, COASTER Swami’s Beach T Gilman Transit Center 30, 41, 150, 201, Lomas Santa Fe 202, 237, 921 Fletcher Cove Beach Park T MTS 30, 41, 150, 921 Solana Beach Station Via De La Valle Pangea Genesee 308, 374 FLEX, COASTER, Amtrak Del Mar North Torrey Pines Thornton UCSD Hospital 15th Fairgrounds T MTS 30 DEL MAR North Torrey Pines VA Medical Center La Jolla La Jolla Village Torrey Pines Shores Scholars State Reserve Nobel Lebon Westeld UCSD Birch Villa La Jolla La Jolla UTC Scripps Green Aquarium Village Square PACIFIC OCEAN Hospital V.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 014 Receive Update on SMTIP[Icon]
    April 2020 Strategic Multimodal Transit Implementation Plan The Strategic Multimodal Transit Implementation Plan (SMTIP) is a ten-year strategic plan that provides insight over current and future travel patterns and demand within NCTD’s service area, and identifies service and capital improvements that will support NCTD’s efforts to provide high quality transit services to North County residents and visitors over the long-term. The plan fol- lows a previous study, the Land Use Transit Integration Study (LUTIS), which identified, through technical analysis and input from stakeholders and the community, priority corridors, focus areas, and preferred strategies to improve transit efficiency and overall attractiveness. Started in August 2019, the SMTIP builds upon the findings of the LUTIS for the design of a ten-year strategy. Over the fall of 2019 and winter of 2020, IBI Group and its team of consultants have focused their efforts on the following tasks: • A review of existing plans, policies, and transit data to provide an up-to-date profile of existing conditions as well as track current and future initiatives to consider and integrate into the strategic plan. • A Transfer Survey, where surveyors went to busy intermodal stations to talk to transit riders and document their trips, with a special focus on origin and destination, as well as the modal combinations that compose their everyday trips. • A Location-Based Services (LBS) Travel Demand Analysis, anonymous cellphone-based data was used to identify overall trip characteristics within and around NCTD’s service area to understand the volume, length, and destinations of all trips in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report
    Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period October 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018 (Q2 of FY19) Page 1 of 39 Contents PERFORMANCE REPORT SUMMARY ......................................................................... 3 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................. 5 YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE ................................................................................. 8 APPENDIX A: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ................................................... 10 APPENDIX B: BREEZE ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS ........ 11 APPENDIX C: COASTER ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND SERVICE STANDARDS ...... 20 APPENDIX D: SPRINTER ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND SERVICE STATISTICS ....... 24 APPENDIX E: LIFT SERVICE DESCRIPTION AND STATISTICS ............................... 28 APPENDIX F: FLEX ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS .............. 33 APPENDIX G: AMTRAK AND METROLINK ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS ................................................................................................................. 36 APPENDIX I: FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM ............................................................... 38 Page 2 of 39 PERFORMANCE REPORT SUMMARY The Quarterly Transit Operations Performance Report provides an overview of NCTD performance trends by mode as they relate to budgeted goals for both year to date (through December 31, 2018) and in the current quarter for the fiscal year. NCTD performance goals are set either as contractual requirements or established
    [Show full text]
  • COASTER Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    COASTER train time schedule & line map COASTER San Diego View In Website Mode The COASTER train line (San Diego) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Diego: 6:15 AM - 7:13 PM (2) San Diego: 5:03 AM - 5:41 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest COASTER train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next COASTER train arriving. Direction: San Diego COASTER train Time Schedule 8 stops San Diego Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 9:35 AM - 7:10 PM Monday 9:35 AM - 11:14 PM Santa Fe Depot 700 W Broadway, San Diego Tuesday 6:15 AM - 7:13 PM Old Town Transit Center Wednesday 6:15 AM - 7:13 PM 4009 Taylor Street, San Diego Thursday 6:15 AM - 7:13 PM Sorrento Valley Station Friday 6:15 AM - 11:15 PM I-5 Local Bypass Lanes, San Diego Saturday 9:35 AM - 11:14 PM Solana Beach Encinitas Station Carlsbad Poinsettia Station COASTER train Info Direction: San Diego Carlsbad Village Station Stops: 8 2787 State Street, Carlsbad Trip Duration: 65 min Line Summary: Santa Fe Depot, Old Town Transit Oceanside Transit Center Center, Sorrento Valley Station, Solana Beach, 115 S Tremont St, Oceanside Encinitas Station, Carlsbad Poinsettia Station, Carlsbad Village Station, Oceanside Transit Center Direction: San Diego COASTER train Time Schedule 8 stops San Diego Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:20 AM - 5:21 PM Monday 8:20 AM - 6:25 PM Oceanside Transit Center 313 S Cleveland St, Oceanside Tuesday 5:03 AM - 5:41 PM Carlsbad Village Station Wednesday 5:03 AM - 5:41 PM 2787 State Street, Carlsbad Thursday 5:03
    [Show full text]