Active Transportation Plan (ATP)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Active Transportation Plan (ATP) City of Encinitas ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 59 1 Scope .........................................................................................................2 3 Proposed Bicycle Facilities ................................................................ 60 Study Area ................................................................................................2 Proposed Pedestrian Facilities ......................................................... 80 Methodology ............................................................................................2 Lane and Path Surfaces .......................................................................83 Comprehensive Process .......................................................................2 Recommendations by Neighborhood .............................................85 Key Variables To Consider ....................................................................5 Resulting Level of Comfort ................................................................ 96 Community Input .....................................................................................6 Rail Corridor Vision Study Recommendations.............................. 99 Project Approach ....................................................................................6 Other Facility Improvement Recommendations .......................... 114 Issues .........................................................................................................6 Interstate 5 and Coastal Rail Line Crossings ................................ 114 ATP Project Goals ...................................................................................11 Rail Line Crossings ...............................................................................115 Project Improvement Types ................................................................12 Intermodal Facilities ............................................................................116 ATP Project Objectives .........................................................................12 Safe Routes to School ......................................................................... 117 Agency Stakeholders .......................................................................... 20 General Recommendations ............................................................... 118 EXISTING CONDITIONS & ANALYSIS 21 APPENDIX 2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ...................................... 22 Fold Up Map Trip Origins ............................................................................................. 22 Land Use ................................................................................................ 25 Existing Residential Areas .................................................................. 25 Existing Population and Housing Density .......................................28 Trip Origin Summary ............................................................................33 Trip Destinations ....................................................................................33 Trip Destination Summary ...................................................................37 Multi-Modal Considerations ...............................................................37 Safety .......................................................................................................38 Opportunities and Constraints ...........................................................41 Analysis Mapping Results ...................................................................48 Community Input ...................................................................................58 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Study Area ............................................................................. 3 Figure 2-14: Slope .................................................................................43 Figure 1-2: Implementation Phases .................................................... 4 Figure 2-15: Posted Speeds ...............................................................45 Figure 1-3: Public Comments by Topic ............................................... 7 Figure 2-16: Roadway Classification .................................................46 Figure 1-4: 2018 CIP List ........................................................................8 Figure 2-17: Number of Lanes ............................................................47 Figure 1-5: Proposed PWP Facilities ................................................. 10 Figure 2-18: GIS Analysis Process ....................................................48 Figure 2-1: Existing Pedestrian Facilities .........................................23 Figure 2-19: Pedestrian Level of Comfort ...................................... 50 Figure 2-2: Existing Bicycle Facilities ...............................................24 Figure 2-20: Barriers to Pedestrian Travel .....................................53 Figure 2-3: Current Land Use ........................................................... 26 Figure 2-21: Bicycle Level of Comfort ..............................................54 Figure 2-4: Planned Land Use ...........................................................27 Figure 2-22: Barriers to Bicyclist Travel ......................................... 56 Figure 2-5: 2016 Population Density............................................... 29 Figure 2-23: Barriers to Pedestrian and Bicyclist Travel .............57 Figure 2-6: 2016 Housing Density ....................................................30 Figure 3-1: Proposed Bicycle Facilities .............................................61 Figure 2-7: 2050 Population Density ................................................31 Figure 3-2: Proposed Class I Bicycle Facilities ............................ 69 Figure 2-8: 2050 Housing Density ...................................................32 Figure 3-3: Proposed Class II Bicycle Facilities ..............................71 Figure 2-9: Destinations ......................................................................34 Figure 3-4: Proposed Class IIB Bicycle Facilities ..........................73 Figure 2-10: 2016 Employment Density...........................................35 Figure 3-5: Proposed Class III Bicycle Facilities ...........................75 Figure 2-11: 2050 Employment Density .........................................36 Figure 3-6: Proposed Class IIIB Bicycle Facilities ......................... 77 Figure 2-12: Transit Systems ...............................................................39 Figure 3-7: Proposed Class IV Bicycle Facilities ...........................79 Figure 2-13: Collisions (2012-2016) ...................................................40 Figure 3-8: Proposed Pedestrian Facilities .....................................81 LIST OF FIGURES (CONT.) Figure 3-9: Leucadia Proposed Pedestrian Projects .....................................................................................86 Figure 3-10: Leucadia Proposed Bicycle Projects ........................................................................................... 87 Figure 3-11: Old Encinitas Proposed Pedestrian Projects ............................................................................. 88 Figure 3-12: Old Encinitas Proposed Bicycle Projects ....................................................................................89 Figure 3-13: Cardiff by the Sea Proposed Pedestrian Projects ....................................................................90 Figure 3-14: Cardiff by the Sea Proposed Bicycle Projects ............................................................................ 91 Figure 3-15: New Encinitas Proposed Pedestrian Projects ...........................................................................92 Figure 3-16: New Encinitas Proposed Bicycle Projects .................................................................................. 93 Figure 3-17: Olivenhain Proposed Pedestrian Projects .................................................................................. 94 Figure 3-18: Olivenhain Proposed Bicycle Projects ........................................................................................95 Figure 3-19: Future Pedestrian Level of Comfort ............................................................................................. 97 Figure 3-20: Future Bicycle Level of Comfort ..................................................................................................98 Figure 3-21: Liverpool Drive Existing and Proposed Coastal Rail Trail Cross-Section ......................... 100 Figure 3-22: Near Verdi Avenue - Existing and Proposed Coastal Rail Trail Cross-Section ................101 Figure 3-23: Encinitas Boulevard - Existing and Proposed Coastal Rail Trail Cross-Section ..............102 Figure 3-24: Bishops Gate Road - Existing and Proposed Coastal Rail Trail Cross-Section ...............103 Figure 3-25: Encinitas Boulevard/Vulcan Avenue Bridge Conceptual Design Illustrations ............... 106 Figure 3-26: Conceptual Design for the Intersection of Encinitas Blvd and Vulcan Ave .....................108 Figure 3-27: Protected Intersection Conceptual Design for Encinitas Blvd at Vulcan Ave ................ 109 Figure 3-28: Rail Corridor .......................................................................................................................................110 Figure 3-29: Coastal Rail Trail/Corridor Feeders
Recommended publications
  • Solar and Human Power Operated Vehicle with Drive Train
    ISSN(Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Website: www.ijirset.com Vol. 6, Issue 4, April 2017 Solar and Human Power Operated Vehicle with Drive Train Prof. Krishna Shrivastava1, NileshWani2, Shoyab Shah3 Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dept. SSBT’s COET, Jalgaon Maharashtra, India1 U.G. Student, , Department of Mechanical Engineering, SSBT’s COET, Jalgaon Maharashtra, India 2 U.G. Student, , Department of Mechanical Engineering, SSBT’s COET, Jalgaon Maharashtra, India 3 ABSTRACT: It is highly essential to produce an alternative vehicle for students travelling for short distance in city. Bicycle is used for transportation, but possessing discomfort with physical exertion required pedaling over roads and uneven terrains. The traditional tricycles are arranged with extremely high gear ratio. A power assist will improve Bicycle comfort and easy for driver to drive it with comfort. This project deals with design and fabrication of bicycle powered by human and solar energy with drive trains having low gear ratio. This results to minimize the problems and constraints over the traditional bicycle and can be frequently used by school/college students. KEYWORDS: Solar Energy, Bicycle, Tricycle, Drive Train I.INTRODUCTION Solar energy is use in various industries. Solar energy having wide range of application. It is unlimited source of energy that is why we have to utilize solar energy. Solar tricycle takes power from solar energy and paddle mechanism both. It may be called as hybrid tricycle. The main cause to develop this is to reduce the use of fossils fuels used by scooters in India.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlsbad Village Double Track Final Draft EA for Publication.Pdf
    Environmental Assessment for thet Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Prepared for Prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment for the Carlsbad Village Double Track Project prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. 304 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 April 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Project Purpose and Need......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Applicable Regulations and Permits ........................................................................................... 1-4 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • GEN Wickam's 10000 Man Light Infantry Division
    O[ A• F COP• ci AD-A211 795 HUMAN POWERED VEHICLES IN SUPPORT OF LIGHT INFANTRY OPERATIONS A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE by STEPHEN T. TATE, MAJ, USA B.S., Middle Tennessee State University, 1975 AftDTIC LECTE zPn AUG 3 0 1989 D. 3 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1989 APPROVED FOP IUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED 89 8 29 022 UNCLASSIFIED JECURITY CLASSIFICATINo THfF AVW~ =IOfNo. 0704-0 188 I~~~~01REOT, pp. 0ro4-,ved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE .... I'a1.6•EPOfT SlTY, Clb RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS nC i. eE~,~~dCLASSIFCATION 3 PiýTRIBUTIgNIIAVAILAt.TY OF RSPORT 2e. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY Approved 1or public release; 2b. DECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING SCHE-DULE distributir., is unlimited. 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 6a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION U.S. Army Command and (If applicable) General Staff College ATZL-SWD-GD 6C. ADDRESS (Ciy,' State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) U.S. Army Command & General Staff College Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-6900 Ba. NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING Bb. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. OROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ORGANIZATION (If applicable) ac. ADDRESS(City, State, and ZIP Code) 10 SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNIT ELEMENT NO. NO. NO. ACCESSION NO. 1i. 1iT L-t include Securivy Cias.sificarion) Human Powered Vehicles in Support of Light Infantry Operations 12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) Major Stephen T.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-H Bicycling Project – Reference Book
    4-H MOTTO Learn to do by doing. 4-H PLEDGE I pledge My HEAD to clearer thinking, My HEART to greater loyalty, My HANDS to larger service, My HEALTH to better living, For my club, my community and my country. 4-H GRACE (Tune of Auld Lang Syne) We thank thee, Lord, for blessings great On this, our own fair land. Teach us to serve thee joyfully, With head, heart, health and hand. This project was developed through funds provided by the Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program (CAAP). No portion of this manual may be reproduced without written permission from the Saskatchewan 4-H Council, phone 306-933-7727, email: [email protected]. Developed in January 2013. Writer: Leanne Schinkel Table of Contents Introduction Objectives .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Getting the Most from this Project ....................................................................................................... 1 Achievement Requirements for this Project ..................................................................................... 2 Safety and Bicycling ................................................................................................................................. 2 Online Safety .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Resources for Learning ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment for thet Carlsbad Village Double Track Project Prepared for Prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment for the Carlsbad Village Double Track Project prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 prepared by BRG Consulting, Inc. 304 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 April 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Project Purpose and Need......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Applicable Regulations and Permits ........................................................................................... 1-4 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Blackstone Bicycle Works
    Blackstone Bicycle Works Refurbished Bicycle Buyers Guide Always wear a helmet and make sure it fits! • Blackstone Bicycle Works sells donated bicycles that we refurbish and sell to help support our youth program. There are different types of bicycles that are good for different styles of riding. • What type of riding would you like to do on your new refurbished bicycle? Choosing Your Bicycle Types of Bicycles at Blackstone Bicycle Works The Cruiser Cruisers have a laid-back upright position for a more comfortable ride. Usually a single speed and sometimes has a coaster brake. Some cruisers also have internally geared hubs that can range from 3-speed and up. With smooth and some-times wider tires this bicycle is great for commuting and utility transport of groceries and other supplies. Add a front basket and rear rack easily to let the bike do the work of carrying things. Most cruisers will accept fenders to help protect you and the bicycle from the rain and snow. The Hybrid Bicycle A hybrid bicycle is mix of a road and mountain bicycle. These bicycles offer a range in gearing and accept wider tires than road bikes do. Some hybrids have a suspension fork while others are rigid. Hybrid bicycles are great for commuting in the winter months because the wider tires offer more stability. You can ride off-road, but it is not recommended for mountain bike trails or single-track riding. Great for gravel and a good all-around versatile bicycle. Great for utility, commuting and for leisure rides to and from the lake front.
    [Show full text]
  • Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study
    City of Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Part of the Coastal Mobility & Livability Study Approved by Resolution 2018-18 February 14, 2018 Encinitas Rail Corridor Vision Study Executive Summary The Rail Corridor Vision Study (RCVS) is the Public Visioning Activities: Early in the centerpiece of the Coastal Mobility and Livability study, the public was invited to discuss issues Study (CMLS), a broad effort to examine mobility and opportunities in the corridor via five in- issues and opportunities in the Encinitas coastal person workshops, nine “pop-up” workshops rail corridor. This unique corridor is centered at community events, outreach to City around the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis commissions, and an eight-week online Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail Corridor and parallel roads comment period through the PlaceSpeak Coast Highway 101 and Vulcan Avenue/San Elijo website. Avenue. Public Open House Reviews: Later in the The RCVS has a broad focus, coordinating study, two “open house” public forums multiple infrastructure elements to create a unified presented and collected public feedback on vision for the rail corridor with both near-term and proposed improvements and priorities. long-term objectives. Community members Guiding Policies and stakeholders drove At the study’s kickoff, the project team developed the following policies to guide the study and the study’s process and inform its technical and engagement activities: conclusions. Increase east-west connections Improve pedestrian & bicycle facilities Technical Support Group: A committee of representatives from agencies with interest in Provide adequate parking the coastal corridor advised the project team Balance mobility improvements with desired and helped define the study’s parameters and community character constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2004-2008 Regional Short-Range Transit Plan Technical
    FY 2004-2008 REGIONAL SHORT- RANGE TRANSIT PLAN TECHNICAL APPENDIX June 2004 INTRODUCTION The SRTP is the five-year plan that balances the short-term needs of maintaining and optimizing existing services, while beginning to implement the long-term transit vision identified in MOBILITY 2030. This technical appendix supports the SRTP with additional documentation on the existing transit system, including operating data used to perform various analyses. Specifically, the technical appendix includes: Appendix A – Who We Are: Description of MTS, NCTD, and SANDAG Appendix B – Existing Transit Services and Programs: Details of existing system Appendix C – FY 2004 Performance Improvement Program (PIP): Contains program description and Performance Improvement Recommendations (PIRs) of each operator Appendix D – FY 2003 Route Operating Statistics: Route-level statistics of all MTS and NCTD routes Appendix E – Historical Operating Statistics: Annual operator-level statistics from past to present Appendix F – FY 2003 Title VI Compliance: Annual update of Title VI assessment Appendix G – Transit/Land Use Memorandum of Understanding: Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) between various jurisdictions Appendix H – North County Transit District Service Implementation Plan FY2005-FY2010: Future service plans of NCTD TABLE OF CONTENTS _______________________________________________ APPENDIX A: WHO WE ARE ...................................................................................................A-1 APPENDIX B: EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES AND PROGRAMS........................................B-1
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Increasing Bikeability
    Strategies for Increasing Bikeability: A Closer Look at the St. Louis Regional Bike Plan Megan McLean Washington University in St Louis Environmental Studies Program Senior Honors Thesis March 2012 St. Louis, Missouri Acknowledgements I’d like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Robert Holahan, for his support and guiding comments during the drafting of this paper. Thanks also to my readers, Dr. Bill Lowry and Professor Beth Martin, and all who have edited the text or given perspective on this paper. Most of all, thanks to the people at Trailnet and Great Rivers Greenway for their continued insight and assistance on this project. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………………3 Chapter 2: Background……………………………………………………………………5 Chapter 3: Benefits of Bicycling…………………………………………………………14 Chapter 4: Obstacles to Cycling Culture………………………………………………...21 Chapter 5:Proposed St. Louis Bicycle Plan……………………………………………...26 Chapter 6: Cost Effectiveness of Infrastructure Initiatives………………………………38 Chapter 7: Cost Effectiveness of Education and Encouragement Programs…………….47 Chapter 8: Analysis………………………………………………………………………54 Chapter 9: Conclusion and Recommendations…………………………………………..58 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………62 Works Cited………………………………………………………..…………………….72 2 Chapter 1: Introduction Transportation system planning in the latter half of the 20th Century has largely focused on the needs of automobiles, pushing the bicycle out of the picture. In recent years, bicycling has re-emerged as a viable mode of transportation, especially with rising gas prices, the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and a desire for more sustainable and livable development patterns. Recent federal policy encourages local city and state governments to support new bike friendly transportation projects. For example, in March of 2010, Secretary of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctrl + F to Search
    Ctrl + F to search Case Number Case Reported Item Description Make Serial Number 2021-00025981 09/23/2021 BIDET 2021-00025981 09/23/2021 JUMPER CABLES 2021-00025723 09/21/2021 3rd Generation Ipad APPLE 2021-00025612 09/20/2021 Jimenez pistol, model J.A. NINE, 9mm calibre, black grip scales JMZ 424198 2021-00025454 09/18/2021 BLK AND BLUE DIAMONDBACK MEN'S BICYCLE W/ BASKET ON FRONT AND CARGO RACK ON THE BACK (UNK SERIAL #) DIAMONDBACK 2021-00025421 09/18/2021 STERLT - 40G 2021-00025421 09/18/2021 STERLT - 40G 2021-00025421 09/18/2021 STORAGE BOX 2021-00025421 09/18/2021 UNDERBED BOX 2021-00025421 09/18/2021 UNDERBED BOX 2021-00025400 09/18/2021 TOW HITCH 2021-00025348 09/17/2021 Gray and Black Evinrude 9.9 horse power boat motor. EVINRUDE R710873 2021-00025290 09/17/2021 Red Sun EZ Sport recumbent bicycle with long wheel base B030333 2021-00025001 09/14/2021 black Appel Iphone 7/8 belonging to Shawn Trontel 2021-00024911 09/13/2021 Dickies seat covers 2021-00024675 09/11/2021 IPHONE 11 WITH BLUE CASE APPLE F4GCG84GN72Y 2021-00024599 09/10/2021 LIV brand mountain bike, Bliss 2 model, teal and coral in color K87035092 2021-00024513 09/09/2021 2018 TREK ROSCOE BICYCLE WITH ORANGE PEDALS, 26 " WHEELS TREK WTU281C0286M 2021-00024462 09/09/2021 CANNONDALE F7 MENS MTN BIKE, SIZE MED, YINGYANG STICKER, COIL LOCK ON SEATPOST CANNONDALE 2021-00024333 09/08/2021 2 DeWalt batteries 5amp labeled with "Plevel Construction" DEWALT 2021-00024333 09/08/2021 3 Milwaukee Fuel batteries 18V MILWAUKEE 2021-00024333 09/08/2021 Cordless Milwaukee Sawzall labeled
    [Show full text]
  • DEL MAR LA JOLLA PACIFIC OCEAN CARLSBAD OCEANSIDE 101 Oceanside to V.A./UCSD Via Highway
    101 Oceanside to V.A./UCSD via Highway 101 M-F • SA • SU • H Destinations/Destinos • Carlsbad State Beach • Coast Hwy. SPRINTER Station • Del Mar Fairgrounds & Racetrack • University of California, • Cedros Design District, Solana San Diego Beach • V.A. Medical Center • Birch Aquarium • Scripps Green Hospital • Salk Institute Oceanside Transit Center LEGEND/Leyenda 302, 303, 313, 318, 392, 395, Map not to scale/Mapa no está a escala SPRINTER, COASTER, Amtrak, Oceanside Blvd. Route/Ruta Metrolink, Greyhound, RTA 202 Street/Calle Weekday a.m./p.m. Coast Hwy. Peak Period Only/ SPRINTER Station Servicio mañanas y tardes 302, 318, SPRINTER durante horas pico solamente Carlsbad Village (within 2 blocks) OCEANSIDE Time Point/Punto de Tiempo Station Landmark/Señal Carlsbad Blvd. 325, COASTER Transfer/Transbordo Cannon CARLSBAD COASTER Station/ Palomar Airport Rd. Estaciones del COASTER Carlsbad Poinsettia SPRINTER Station/ (COASTER Station Station Estaciones del SPRINTER located within 2 blocks of Breakwater Rd.) 444, 445, 446, Highway 101 373 FLEX, COASTER Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas Station 304, 309, 374 FLEX, COASTER Swami’s Beach T Gilman Transit Center 30, 41, 150, 201, Lomas Santa Fe 202, 237, 921 Fletcher Cove Beach Park T MTS 30, 41, 150, 921 Solana Beach Station Via De La Valle Pangea Genesee 308, 374 FLEX, COASTER, Amtrak Del Mar North Torrey Pines Thornton UCSD Hospital 15th Fairgrounds T MTS 30 DEL MAR North Torrey Pines VA Medical Center La Jolla La Jolla Village Torrey Pines Shores Scholars State Reserve Nobel Lebon Westeld UCSD Birch Villa La Jolla La Jolla UTC Scripps Green Aquarium Village Square PACIFIC OCEAN Hospital V.A.
    [Show full text]