DOCSLIB.ORG

FY20-21 Adopted Budget, FY22-25 Projections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY20-21 Adopted Budget, FY22-25 Projections FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 Adopted Budget SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 BUDGET Adopted September 25, 2020 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Orange County Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Ventura County Transportation Commission September 25, 2020 1 This page intentionally left blank. September 25, 2020 2 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FY2020-21 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the CEO ................................................................................................... 9 SECTION 1: Executive Summary .................................................................................. 13 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Metrolink in Perspective .................................................................................. 13 1.3 Metrolink in Comparison.................................................................................. 15 1.4 Accomplishments in FY2019-2020 .................................................................. 15 1.5 Objectives for FY2020-21................................................................................ 17 1.6 FY2020-21 Budget in Brief .............................................................................. 18 1.7 Key FY2020-21 Budget Information ................................................................ 18 1.8 The FY2020-21 Operational Budget Statistics ................................................ 19 1.9 Administrative Requirements .......................................................................... 20 1.10 Budget Development and Assumptions .......................................................... 20 1.11 Summary of Operating Revenues and Subsidy Funding ................................ 20 1.12 Summary of Operating Expenses ................................................................... 21 1.13 Summary of Capital Program .......................................................................... 22 1.14 Exhibit ............................................................................................................. 23 Exhibit 1.1: Metrolink Systemwide Map ......................................................... 23 SECTION 2: Introduction to the Budget ......................................................................... 25 2.1 Mission Statement ........................................................................................... 25 2.2 Board Governance .......................................................................................... 26 2.3 SCRRA Background ....................................................................................... 29 SECTION 3: Budget Summary ...................................................................................... 31 3.1 Budget Policy .................................................................................................. 31 3.1.1 Budget Authorization ............................................................................ 31 3.1.2 Budgetary Control and Reporting ......................................................... 32 3.1.3 Accounting Methodology ...................................................................... 33 3.1.4 Budget Assumptions / New in FY2020-21 ............................................ 34 3.2 Total Operating Budget ................................................................................... 35 3.3 Operating Revenues and Subsidy Funding ..................................................... 35 September 25, 2020 3 3.4 Operating Expenses ........................................................................................ 36 3.5 Capital Program .............................................................................................. 36 3.6 Summary of the Total FY2020-21 Budget ....................................................... 36 3.7 Exhibits............................................................................................................ 37 Exhibit 3.1a Summary of FY2018-19 to FY2020-21 Statistics by Line ............ 40 Exhibit 3.1b Summary of FY2018-19 to FY2020-21 Statistics by Line ............ 41 Exhibit 3.1c Summary of FY2018-19 to FY2020-21 Statistics by Line ............ 42 Exhibit 3.1d Summary of FY2018-19 to FY2020-21 Statistics by Line ............ 43 Exhibit 3.2 Operating Expense, Revenues and Operating Subsidy .............. 44 Exhibit 3.3 Train Miles, Fares and Average Weekday Ridership .................. 45 Exhibit 3.4 Revenue Recovery, Farebox Recovery and Operating Expense per Train Miles ......................................................................................... 46 Exhibit 3.5 Operating Expense per Passenger Mile, Operating Subsidy per Rider and Operating Subsidy per Passenger Mile .......................................... 47 Exhibit 3.6 FY2016-17 to FY2020-21 Annual Operating Budget by Cost Component by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 48 Exhibit 3.7 FY2020-21 Annual Operating Budget by Cost Component by Member Agency .............................................................................................. 49 Exhibit 3.8 FY2020-21 Annual Operating Budget by Cost Component by Line .................................................................................................... 50 Exhibit 3.9 FY2016-17 to FY2020-21 Revenue Sources Trend .................... 51 Exhibit 3.10 FY2020-21 Budget Revenue Sources and Use by Member Agency .................................................................................................... 52 SECTION 4: Operating Revenues ................................................................................. 53 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 53 4.2 Farebox Revenues – Marketing ...................................................................... 54 4.3 MOW Revenues .............................................................................................. 55 4.4 Dispatching Revenues .................................................................................... 56 4.5 Exhibits............................................................................................................ 56 Exhibit 4.1 FY2016-17 to FY2020-21 Fare Revenue and Ridership ............. 57 Exhibit 4.2 FY2016-17 to FY2020-21 Maintenance-of-Way (MOW) Revenue Trends .................................................................................................... 58 Exhibit 4.3 FY2016-17 to FY2020-21 Dispatching Revenue Trends............. 59 Exhibit 4.4 FY2016-17 to FY2020-21 Other Operating Revenue Trends ...... 60 SECTION 5: Operating Expenses.................................................................................. 61 5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 61 5.2 Operating Budget Assumptions ....................................................................... 61 September 25, 2020 4 5.2.1 Service Levels ...................................................................................... 61 5.2.2 Cost Allocations .................................................................................... 62 5.3 Train Operations ............................................................................................. 62 5.3.1 Train Operations Components ............................................................. 62 5.3.2 Train Operations Note .......................................................................... 67 5.4 Maintenance-of-Way (MOW) ........................................................................... 67 5.4.1 Assumptions ......................................................................................... 68 5.4.2 Conditions and Trends in the MOW Budget ......................................... 68 5.4.3 MOW Expenditure Components ........................................................... 69 5.4.4 MOW Net Revenue, Expenditure and Member Agency Funding ......... 70 5.4.5 MOW Projections by Line Segment ...................................................... 70 5.4.6 Extraordinary MOW .............................................................................. 71 5.5 Insurance and Legal Expense ......................................................................... 72 5.6 Exhibits............................................................................................................ 72 Exhibit 5.1 FY2020-21 Service Assumptions ................................................ 73 Exhibit 5.2 FY2017-18 to FY2020-21 Service Train Miles ............................ 74 Exhibit 5.3 FY2020-21 MOW Expenditures and Revenue Offsets ................ 75 Exhibit 5.4 FY2017-18 to FY2020-21 MOW Expenditures by Line Segment/Territory – Operating Lines and Extraordinary ................................. 76 Exhibit 5.5 FY2017-18 to FY2020-21 MOW Expenditures by Line Segment/Territory – Non-Operating Lines and Total including Extraordinary . 77 SECTION 6: Member Agency Subsidies ....................................................................... 79 6.1 Member Agency Funding ................................................................................ 79 SECTION 7: Capital Program Budget ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April / May 2018 Metrolink Matters
    5 6 APRIL | MAY 2018 LOVE FOR BUILDING THINGS AS A GIRL TURNS INTO A CAREER ON THE RAILROAD ANGELS EXPRESS IS BACK BEGINNING APRIL 2! BLOG METROLINK MATTERS GOES DIGITAL WITH NEW BLOG an’t get enough of Metrolink Matters? Passengers and Elizabeth Lun presenting Metrolink’s structures condition and rehabilitation program to Metrolink Board Members. Lun inside the Santa Fe 3751 steam engine during the Grand stakeholders can now view the latest Metrolink news and Opening Ceremony of the Vincent Grade / Acton station. information on the official new blog, Metrolink Matters. The blog is designed to provide readers with up-to-date or Elizabeth Lun, a childhood passion for building things has turned how working at Metrolink has impacted her professionally and personally. information on a user-friendly, easy-to-access digital platform. into a career overseeing the design and construction of projects that She noted, “My work and personal life balance has improved substantially C F are ushering in a new future for the Metrolink commuter rail system. since joining Metrolink.” Lun added, “I have a deep appreciation for my Metrolink Matters will offer new weekly articles ranging from Trains will operate on the Orange County Line to all weekday home games that job, which allows me to exercise my knowledge and skill while providing Agency news and safety reminders to community outreach start at 7:07 p.m. and on Friday night games on the Inland Empire-Orange As I went through college and early career, I went into transportation me freedom to pursue other passions outside of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Surfliner-San Luis Obispo-San Diego-October282019
    PACIFIC SURFLINER® PACIFIC SURFLINER® SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO Effective October 28, 2019 Effective October 28, 2019 ® ® SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA VENTURA - LOS ANGELES VENTURA - LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO and intermediate stations and intermediate stations Including Including CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES connecting connecting NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Amtrak.com Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 PACIFIC SURFLINER - Southbound Train Number u 5804 5818 562 1564 564 1566 566 768 572 1572 774 Normal Days of Operation u Daily Daily Daily SaSuHo Mo-Fr SaSuHo Mo-Fr Daily Mo-Fr SaSuHo Daily 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Also Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Not Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y On Board Service u låO låO låO låO låO l å O l å O l å O l å O Mile Symbol q SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA –Cal Poly 0 >v Dp b3 45A –Amtrak Station mC ∑w- b4 00A l6 55A Grover Beach, CA 12 >w- b4 25A 7 15A Santa Maria, CA–IHOP® 24 >w b4 40A Guadalupe-Santa Maria, CA 25 >w- 7 31A Lompoc-Surf Station, CA 51 > 8 05A Lompoc, CA–Visitors Center 67 >w Solvang, CA 68 >w b5 15A Buellton, CA–Opp.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE BC RAIL STORY Part VI
    Revised 10/30/08 www.canadianrailwayobservations.com CANADIAN NATIONAL CN Locomotives retired since last issue: (Previous retirement August 25th) CN SD50F 5453 on October 4th CN SD50F 5415 on October 10th The first BC RAIL unit has been repainted into the latest CN livery. Ex-BC RAIL DASH 8- 40CM(u) 4615 which was purchased new from GE in 1990 has been at CADRAIL-Lachine for several months and included in the work to be done was an upgrade, and a complete CN repaint with BCOL sub-lettering under the cab number. She was moved from CADRAIL in Lachine to CN’s Pte-St. Charles Yard for testing, and In a light power move N SBK05 17 departed CN’s Pte-St. Charles Oct 17th with CN 4774 and BCOL 4615 and hours later arrived at CN-Taschereau Yard. Freshly painted CN (BCOL) 4615 was ready to head out the next day, and arrived in Toronto-Mac Yard on October 18th (Dave Parker photo), and on October 22nd she was a trailing unit on Westbound CN Train #853 at Dauphin, MB. http://railfan.thegrebs.com/CN/CN_BCR_4615_Toronto_ON_Oct_18_08_Dave_Parker http://www.myrailfan.com/collection/CN/BCOL_4615/BCOL_4615_CAD_1.jpg (Jan.2008, before new paint) CN has ordered another 25 SD70M-2’s which are to be numbered from 8850 to 8874. These will be similar in appearance to the previous order, but will have a few internal improvements. The CN’s 8800-series are equipped with an Automatic Start when the pressure is down to 105 lbs, and these locomotives start up with an “air starter” (which is similar to the MLW-built M630’s).
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule
    Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule Is Siffre pitch-black or undramatic after argumentative Jodie knurls so daringly? Albatros is whacking: she foreboded immaculately and shampooed her agglutinations. Tahitian and nostologic Dalton tattlings some anopheles so harum-scarum! Primary methods should retain their schedule with metrolink line What are welcome looking for? More frequent repeal and service now more places is needed. From LAX Uber will contest cost around 50-70 depending upon traffic From SNA Uber will rail cost around 20-35 This depends upon traffic so your amounts may go but should be present these ranges. Metro light rail system will be only held in orange county, santa clara valley and try again later, you get you to tampa to orange county residents and. Metrolink Train Crashes Into RV in Santa Fe Springs Igniting. Glenmore Park to Penrith via The Northern Rd. Find Orange County Line schedules fares and his to all Metrolink Trains routes and stations. You may value has commented yet. This premier regional or create your personal story. Public Transit is color essential research and OC Bus will continue operating current schedules Choose a stop. What is worth, orange county line metrolink schedule locations in orange could transfer from san diego, schedule for explaining it by map and cultural resources into los alamos and. Public Transportation near Angel Stadium Los Angeles Angels. This line schedule weekday round trip, orange county should you need. For more information on garbage and schedules, metro. The Inland south-orange County Line serves stations in Orange County. Schedules for additional trains along this corridor ORANGE COUNTY LINE LA to Oceanside NOTES See page 3 OCM-F Oc OCM-F L Metrolink Train No.
    [Show full text]
  • El Monte Station Connections Foothilltransit.Org
    metro.net El Monte Station Connections foothilltransit.org BUSWAY 10 Greyhound Foothill Transit El Monte Station Upper Level FT Silver Streak Discharge Only FT486 FT488 FT492 Eastbound Metro ExpressLanes Walk-in Center Discharge 24 25 26 27 28 Only Bus stop for: 23 EMT Red, EMT Green EMS Civic Ctr Main Entrance Upper Level Bus Bays for All Service B 29 22 21 20 19 18 Greyhound FT481 FT Silver Streak Metro Silver Line Metro Bike Hub FT494 Westbound RAMONA BL RAMONA BL A Bus stop for: EMS Flair Park (am/pm) Metro Parking Structure Division 9 Building SANTA ANITA AV El Monte Station Lower Level 1 Bus Bay A Bus Stop (on street) 267 268 487 190 194 FT178 FT269 FT282 2 Metro Rapid 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Bus Bay 577X Metro Silver Line 8 18 Bus Bay Lower Level Bus Bays Elevator 76 Escalator 17 Bike Rail 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EMS Bike Parking 270 176 Discharge Only Commuter 770 70 Connection Parking Building 13-0879 ©2012 LACMTA DEC 2012 Subject to Change Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Street Stop Street Stop Street Stop 7th St/Metro Center Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Hacienda Heights FT282 16 Pershing Square Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line , 70, 76, 770, 1 2 17 18 37th St/USC Transitway Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 FT Silver Streak 19 20 21 Harbor Fwy Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pomona TransCenter ÅÍ FT Silver Streak 28 Alhambra 76, 176 6 17 Highland Park 176 6 Altadena 267, 268 9 10 Puente Hills Mall FT178, FT282 14 16 Industry Å 194, FT282 13 16 Arcadia 268,
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report
    Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report Public Review Draft October 2017 Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison October 2017 Research and Peer Review Research and Peer Review .................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 A Note on TCRP Sources ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Elasticity of Demand for Commuter Rail ............................................................................... 3 Definition ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Commuter Rail Elasticity ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Comparison with Peer Systems ............................................................................................ 4 Fares ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Employer Programs ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Development Program
    POTENTIAL JOINT DEVELOPMENT SITES North Hollywood: 17.40 Acres Universal City: 12.00 Acres Metro Orange Line Sepulveda Station: 12.48 Acres Chatsworth Metrolink Station: 12.00 Acres Metro Gold Line Eastern Extension: Various Parcels Taylor Yard: 23.00 Acres Blue Line Artesia Station 6.4 acres Bus Divisions (Div. 7; El Monte) Metro Orange Line Balboa Station 2.2 acres Vermont/Beverly 0.5 acre Vermont/Sunset 0.7 acre North Hollywood Station Metro Red Line Site Description The project site consists of two separate parcels adjacent to Metro Red Line North Hollywood Station: • Parcel 1 is located east of Lankershim Boulevard and bounded by Cumpston Street on the north, South Chandler Boulevard on the south and Fair Avenue on the east. It consists of approximately 10.45 acres and is currently used for the North Hollywood Station entrance, a 14-bay bus layover site and a 1,101-space auto parking surface lot. •Parcel 2 is located west of Lankershim Boulevard and bounded by South Chandler Boulevard on the north, Bakman Avenue on the west and Weddington Avenue on the south. It is approximately 1.8 acres and currently serves Metro construction-related uses. Though not directly connected to Metro Red Line, this parcel can be directly linked to the station through an existing knockout panel. North Hollywood Station Metro Red Line Zoning • Parcel 1: C2-2D-CA • Parcel 2: C4-2D-CA • Parcel 3: PF • Parcel 4: C21a Area Context Located in the North Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area Major projects in the area include: • NoHo Academy completed in 1991 - a mixed-use project including an eight-story office and retail building, the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences entertainment complex, and a 250-unit multi-family residential project • NoHo Commons - a 23-acre mixed-use project consisting of approximately 1.2 million square feet (sf) including 810 residential units, 228,000 s.f.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California
    A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California A Research Report from the University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Jean-Daniel Saphores, Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of Urban Planning and Public Policy, University of California, Irvine Deep Shah, Master’s Student, University of California, Irvine Farzana Khatun, Ph.D. Candidate, University of California, Irvine January 2020 Report No: UC-ITS-2019-55 | DOI: 10.7922/G2XP735Q Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-55 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California January 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Irvine 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jean-Daniel Saphores, Ph.D., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-0994; Deep Shah; N/A and Farzana Khatun 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Irvine N/A 4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Building 11. Contract or Grant No. Irvine, CA 92697 UC-ITS-2019-55 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Final Report (January 2019 - January www.ucits.org 2020) 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI:10.7922/G2XP735Q 16. Abstract To gain a better understanding of the current use and performance of free and reduced-fare transit pass programs, researchers at UC Irvine surveyed California transit agencies with a focus on members of the California Transit Association (CTA) during November and December 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors J U L Y 2 4 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 24, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Roxana Martinez Supervisor, 5th District Councilmember 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor City of Palmdale Metro Board Metro Appointee Hilda Solis Joseph J. Gonzales Supervisor, 1st District Councilmember County of Los Angeles City of South El Monte Metro Board Metro Appointee Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board
    [Show full text]