Joint Development Program
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sherman Oaks-Studio City-Toluca Lake-Cahuenga Pass Activity Log
SHERMAN OAKS-STUDIO CITY- TOLUCA LAKE-CAHUENGA PASS Community Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACTIVITY LOG COMMUNITY MAPS COMMUNITY PLAN I. Introduction II. Function of the Community Plan III. Land Use Policies and Programs IV. Coordination Opportunities for Public Agencies V. Urban Design www.lacity.org/PLN (General Plans) A Part of the General Plans - City of Los Angeles SHERMAN OAKS-STUDIO CITY-TOLUCA LAKE-CAHUENGA PASS ACTIVITY LOG ADOPTION DATE PLAN CPC FILE NO. COUNCIL FILE NO. May 13, 1998 Sherman Oaks-Studio City-Toluca Lake-Cahuenga 95-0356 CPU 97-0704 Pass Community Plan Update Jan. 4, 1991 Ventura-Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan 85-0383 85-0926 S22 May 13, 1992 Mulholland Scenic Parkway Specific Plan 84-0323 SP 86-0945 ADOPTION DATE AMENDMENT CPC FI LE NO. COUNCIL FIL E Sept. 7, 2016 Mobility Plan 2035 Update CPC-2013-910-GPA-SPCA-MSC 15-0719 SHERMAN OAKS-STUDIO CITY- TOLUCA LAKE-CAHUENGA PASS Community Plan Chapter I INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY BACKGROUND PLAN AREA The Sherman Oaks-Studio City-Toluca Lake-Cahuenga Pass Community Plan area is located approximately 8 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, is bounded by the communities of North Hollywood, Van Nuys-North Sherman Oaks on the north, Hollywood, Universal City and a portion of the City of Burbank on the east, Encino-Tarzana on the west and Beverly Crest-Bel Air to the south. The area is comprised of five community subareas, each with its own identity, described as follows: • Cahuenga Pass is the historical transition from the highly urbanized core of the city to the rural settings identified with the San Fernando Valley. -
The Demille Apartments 7716 Laurel Canyon Blvd | North Hollywood, CA MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS
OFFERING MEMORANDUM The DeMille Apartments 7716 Laurel Canyon Blvd | North Hollywood, CA MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 2 2 | APARTMENT NAME CONTENTS 04 |PROPERTY OVERVIEW MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 06 |AREA OVERVIEW - SAN FERNANDO VALLEY 10 |FINANCIAL OVERVIEW EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY BRANDON DICKER ASSOCIATE-MULTIFAMILY Direct +1 818 923 6118 Mobile +1 818 523 1754 [email protected] License No. 01958894 (CA) DAVID HARRINGTON EVP & NATIONAL DIRECTOR - MULTIFAMILY Direct +1 310 295 1170 Mobile +1 310 497 5590 [email protected] License No. 01320460 (CA) 3 MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 4 Property Overview OPPORTUNITY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 7716 Laurel Canyon Boulevard presents a unique opportunity to capitalize • 16 Units, Built in 1970 MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS on a well maintained multifamily property in one of Los Angeles’s most • Tremendous Rent Upside Potential of 83% popular rental markets, North Hollywood. Built in 1970, the building has • Great Mix of One, Two, and Three Bedroom Units been maintained very well and has a quiet and secluded feel. With central AC, heating, and on-site laundry, tenants are provided with the essentials • Building Size of 14,979 Square Feet and amenities of living in a prime neighborhood. This building will provide • Currently 100% Occupied an investor a great value-add opportunity with tremendous upside in rents • Lot Size of 0.45 Acres with R3 Zoning upwards of 89 percent. • Front Structure is Two Stories with 10 units, Back Structure is Two Stories with 6 Units The building consists of 16 units which include six one-bedroom units, • Units Feature Central Air Conditioning nine two-bedroom units, and one three-bedroom unit. -
Surveyla Boyle Heights Pilot Survey Report
SurveyLA Boyle Heights Pilot Survey Report Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning’s Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Inc Pasadena, CA April 2010 SURVEYLA BOYLE HEIGHTS PILOT SURVEY REPORT APRIL 2010 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Description of Survey Area ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 II. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Summary of Contexts and Themes .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Individual Resources ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Historic Districts .................................................................................................................................................... -
Prime Noho Arts District LISTING TEAM
A proposed 10 unit or 17-unit TOC development opportunity Prime NoHo Arts District LISTING TEAM CHLOE ARZY JEFF LOUKS ELLIOT SABAG Associate Executive Vice President of Investments Multifamily Associate (818) 212-2814 (818) 212-2780 (818) 212-2672 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] DRE #02124537 DRE #00908473 DRE #01989131 The information contained in the following Offering Memorandum is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Marcus & Millichap and it should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of Marcus & Millichap. By taking possession of and reviewing the information contained herein the recipient agrees to hold and treat all such information in the strictest confidence. The recipient further agrees that recipient will not photocopy or duplicate any part of the Offering Memorandum. If you have no interest in the subject property at this time, please return this Offering Memorandum to Marcus & Millichap. This Offering Memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified financial and physical information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Marcus & Millichap has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCBs or asbestos, the compliance with local, state and federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property. -
Transit Service Plan
Attachment A 1 Core Network Key spines in the network Highest investment in customer and operations infrastructure 53% of today’s bus riders use one of these top 25 corridors 2 81% of Metro’s bus riders use a Tier 1 or 2 Convenience corridor Network Completes the spontaneous-use network Focuses on network continuity High investment in customer and operations infrastructure 28% of today’s bus riders use one of the 19 Tier 2 corridors 3 Connectivity Network Completes the frequent network Moderate investment in customer and operations infrastructure 4 Community Network Focuses on community travel in areas with lower demand; also includes Expresses Minimal investment in customer and operations infrastructure 5 Full Network The full network complements Muni lines, Metro Rail, & Metrolink services 6 Attachment A NextGen Transit First Service Change Proposals by Line Existing Weekday Frequency Proposed Weekday Frequency Existing Saturday Frequency Proposed Saturday Frequency Existing Sunday Frequency Proposed Sunday Frequency Service Change ProposalLine AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl R2New Line 2: Merge Lines 2 and 302 on Sunset Bl with Line 200 (Alvarado/Hoover): 15 15 15 20 30 60 7.5 12 7.5 15 30 60 12 15 15 20 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 20 20 20 30 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 •E Ğǁ >ŝŶĞϮǁ ŽƵůĚĨŽůůŽǁ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ>ŝŶĞƐϮΘϯϬϮƌŽƵƚĞƐŽŶ^ƵŶƐĞƚůďĞƚǁ -
Los Angeles Orange Line
Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida CCOOVVEERR PPHHOTOOTO LLooss AAnnggeelleess CCoouunnttyy MMeettrrooppololiittanan TTransransppoorrttaattioionn AAuutthhoorriittyy DDIISCSCLLAAIIMMEERR TThhiis ds dooccuumemennt it is is inntteennddeed ad as a ts teecchhnniiccaal al assssiissttaanncce pe prroodduucctt. I. It it is dsiiss ssdeemmiinnaatteed udnn ddueer tr thhe sepp oosnnssoorrsshhiip opf tf tohhe Ue..SS U.. DDeeppaarrttmemennt ot of Tf Trraannssppoorrttaattiioon in in tn thhe ie inntteerreesst ot of if innffoorrmamattiioon enxxcc ehhaannggee. T. Thhe Uenn iittUeed Sdttaa Sttees Gsoo vvGeerrnnmemennt atss ssauumemes nso nlo liiaabbiilliittyy ffoor ir itts cs coonntteenntts os or ur usse te thheerreeooff. T. Thhe Ue Unniitteed Sd Sttaattees Gs Goovveerrnnmemennt dtoo eeds nsoo tn et ennddoorrsse perroo pdduucctts osf mfo aa nnmuuffaaccttuurreerrss. T. Trraadde oerr o mamannuuffaaccttuurreerrss’ n’ naamemes as appppeeaar her herreeiin sn soolleelly by beeccaauusse te thheey ayrre a ceoo nncssiiddeerreed edssss eeennttiiaal tl to tohh et oebb jjeeoccttiivve oef tf tohhiis rs reeppoorrtt.. Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. -
1922 Ii I )( L Ic.=~==.=.-= ~~ I
.;2.::J..352-/ .z<0 UBiiRY USE ONLY The y-os Angeles Plan I II ------ . I' \ 11 -, \ , I t t\, ',.','" ~ \ '~ .•...\ J : ~ " , i I {, I 1 II I . t, I ,I, 1, j " 'I \ II' \1 I I' I r, ::::- .... ,( - L A Selected Traffic Program ~" \' comPiled by I:, - I ; Theb Losi1 Angeles Traffic Commis~ion I December, 1922 Ii I )( L Ic.=~==.=.-=_~~ I \;\\ ~ ~~1 •• --------LLL\llL'/=O=e=;;;,~,..I"«l~~J>=". ~;;;o. ..wrE========================== ll\et\ll (~i\\e ~\s l\I ,\ .,..cft\C1-' rPO'Ir\O'ri Origin rI . and Objects of the Los Angeles Traffic Commission HE LOS ANGELES Traffic Commission was created to fill the pressing need of an organization to solve the constantly increasing Dedication Ttraffic congestion problems of the City of Los Angeles. H. Z. Osborne, Jr.,Chief Engineer of the Board of Public Utilities, was directed by the Board of Public Utilities to make a comprehensive survey I and report on the subject of traffic congestion and detailed methods of relief. HIS REPORT of the Los An- The preliminary report on this subject was adopted by the _Boar oJ. Public geles Traffic Commission is re- U-.ill.i.t.if.LQ.!1I2..~~mhe.r )2th, 19211. an_cL.su12§.!:9~entlyJ?y the Honorable City Tspectfully dedicated to the Hon- Council on January 4th, 1922. In this report it was recommended that the orable, the Mayor and the City Council repre"sentatives-of-tne"val'ious civic and industrial organizations working on of Los Angeles, with the hope that it this problem, should be called into a con ference to secure the benefit of the may prove helpful in the solution of work 'Of each, and at the same time, to avoid duplication of the work and the traffic problems of this city: to adjust conflicting recommendations before they were finally presented to the Honorable City Council for adoption. -
Dignity Health Ventura Plans U.S. Healthworks Network
DIGNITY HEALTH VENTURA PLANS U.S. HEALTHWORKS NETWORK U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Alaska, LLC - U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Arizona, PC - Tempe Anchorage (Huffman) 1626 South Priest Drive Suite 101 12350 Industry Way Suite 160 Tempe AZ 85281 Anchorage AK 99515 (480) 921-2273 (907) 345-4343 U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Arizona, PC - U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Alaska, LLC - Eagle Tucson (East) River 888 S Craycroft Rd # 150 17101 Snowmobile Lane Suite 102 Tucson AZ 85711 Eagle River AK 99577 (520) 747-0446 (907) 694-7223 U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Arizona, PC - U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Alaska, LLC - Tucson (North) Fairbanks 2945 W Ina Rd # 103 1867 Airport Way Suite 130B Tucson AZ 85741 Fairbanks AK 99701 520-877-8600 907) 452-2178 U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Arizona, PC - U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Alaska, LLC - Lake Tucson (West) Otis I 1661 W. Grant Rd. 4100 Lake Otis Parkway Suite 322 Tucson AZ 85745 Anchorage AK 99508 520-628-4340 907) 562-1234 U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group, PC - (Riverside) U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Alaska, LLC - Lake Moreno Valley Otis II (Urgent Care Center) 6485 Day Street Suite 302 4100 Lake Otis Parkway Suite 100 Riverside CA 92507 Anchorage AK 99508 (951) 653-5291 (907) 563-4006 U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group, PC - Carlsbad U.S. HealthWorks Medical Group of Arizona, PC - 5810 El Camino Real Suite A Scottsdale Carlsbad CA 92008 10335 N. Scottsdale Road (760) 929-8269 Scottsdale AZ 85253 (480) 991-9358 U.S. -
January 2015
metro.net Metro Orange Line Connections h s a W h s a a Hansen Dam n DEVONSHIRE ST DEVONSHIRE ST DEVONSHIRE ST 5 a W s u r S Chatsworth Station u a lb t i ARLETA AVG Metro Rapid Stop n 405 W W O a Chatsworth Station L S O D METROLINK GLENOAKS BL O E LAUREL CYN BL D Metro Rapid Line TOPANGA CYN BL CYN TOPANGA TOPANGA CYN BL CYN TOPANGA N M LASSEN ST LASSEN ST LASSEN ST A N S Metro Orange Line T SAN FERNANDO RD CHATSWORTH A A T Station VA V E TAMPA AV TAMPA Sepulveda Metro Orange Line CORBIN AV ZELZAH AV F WILBUR AV RESEDA BL RESEDA PLUMMER ST PLUMMER ST PLUMMER BL BALBOA ST PLUMMER ST ARLETA W DE SOTO AV DE SOTO WOODLEY AV WOODLEY Y WINNETKA AV SEPULVEDA BL SEPULVEDA Metro Rail Station VINCENNES ST TERRA BELLA ST Northridge East CanyonARLETA Channel AV SUN AMTRAK/METROLINK 27 Fashion CSUN NORTH HILLS VALLEY Metro Red Line Center NORTHRIDGE NORDHOFF ST AV DARBY NORDHOFF ST NORDHOFF ST OSBORNE ST Transfers SAN DIEGO FWY Nordhoff Station Metrolink h SHELDON ST NORDHOFF ST Northridge Station s a PANORAMA W Amtrak 5 Bull Creek BRANFORD ST PARTHENIA ST PARTHENIA ST PARTHENIA ST CITY Parking a 15-0989 ©2014 LACMTA m H WEST HILLS i o CHASE ST O DEC 2014 Subject to Change c L a L P ROSCOE BL Roscoe Station ROSCOE BL ROSCOE BL Y W TUXFORD ST O O Sun Valley Station METROLINK D Aliso Canyon Wash Aliso Canyon SAN FERNANDO RD STRATHERN ST STRATHERN ST F STRATHERN ST W Y DE SOTO AV DE SOTO Van Nuys Station Tujunga Wash FlyAway WHITSETT AV Bus Terminal NUYS BL VAN WHITE OAK AV WHITE OAK TAMPA AV TAMPA VARIEL AV VARIEL WOODLAKE AV WOODLAKE WOODLAKE AV -
Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing. -
I-80 Eastbound
State Route 60 State Route 60 California Numbered FREEWAY INTERCHANGES FREEWAY INTERCHANGES Exit Uniform System EAST WEST County Statewide Both directions (normal text); or, Both directions (normal text); or, Post Mile MILE post EAST only ( green italics ) EXIT NUMBERS WEST only (blue italics) (Co PM) (SMP) Legend Proposed Exit Number 380 Shared Alignment (subordinate route noted) Partial Installation (1-post sign, only) 360 360 Rest Area, Vista Point, or Weigh Station County Installed Exit Number 359 ( On-freeway facility with SMP reference - not an exit ) Prefix ( no text in grey background - - no facility; or, exit on opposite side/direction of freeway ) Los Angeles 0.00 Los Angeles County 0.55 0.55 I-5 1 A 1 A I-10 / Santa Monica 1.48 1.48 Whittier Blvd / Lorena Street 1 B 1 B Mateo Street / Santa Fe Avenue US-101 North / I-5 North / Soto Street Los 1 C 0.55 0.55 Angeles Los Angeles 0.38 0.55 1 D Soto St 1.48 1.48 1 E I-5 North / Sacramento 1.48 1.48 1 D Lorena Street 1.94 1.94 2 Indiana Street 2.59 2.59 3rd Street / Downey Road 3 A Downey Road 3.27 3.27 I-710 / Valley Blvd / Long Beach 3 B I-710 / Long Beach Monterey 4.43 4.43 Atlantic Blvd 4 Atlantic Blvd Findlay Avenue 6 A 5.89 5.89 6 Garfield Avenue / Wilcox Avenue Montebello 5.89 5.89 Garfield Avenue / Wilcox Avenue 6 B 7.77 7.77 Paramount Blvd 8 8 Paramount Blvd 8.55 8.55 San Gabriel Blvd 9 9 San Gabriel Blvd SR-19 / Rosemead Blvd 10 A SR-19 / Rosemead Blvd Rosemead 9.51 9.51 10.23 10.23 Santa Anita Avenue 10 B Santa Anita Avenue South El 11.01 11.01 Peck Road 11 Peck Road / -
Proudly Serving Southern California for 20 Years Message from the Board of Directors 1
20th Anniversary Report Proudly serving Southern California for 20 years Message from the Board of Directors 1 1 Who we are 2 2 How it all began 4 3 Metrolink steps up in Northridge earthquake aftermath 8 4 Holiday Toy Express® comes to town 10 5 Paving the way for more connections 12 6 Tragedy strikes the Metrolink family, sparks safety innovation 14 7 Chatsworth collision inspires safety transformation 18 8 Focusing on customers 30 9 Reducing emissions and congestion one car at a time 38 10 What’s next 42 Timeline 46 System maps 48 Sources 50 ii Message from the Board of Directors On Oct. 26, 2012, Metrolink celebrates 20 years of providing transportation solutions to Southern Californians. In 1988, Southern California commuters voiced a need for commuter rail service as an alternative to the widespread gridlock in our region, and transportation officials from five counties banded together to make it happen. Metrolink has grown tremendously, from transporting around 939,000 riders during fiscal year 1992-1993 to more than 11.9 million riders in fiscal year 2011-2012. Sixty-five percent of passengers surveyed after Metrolink’s first year of service said that they drove alone before Metrolink’s debut. Today an estimated 8.5 million weekday automobile trips are removed from the road each year because of the service Metrolink provides. Throughout its history when the public needed a solution, Metrolink rose to the challenge, whether that meant extending service lines like we did after the 1994 Northridge earthquake when freeways collapsed or introducing Bike Cars in 2011 to accommodate growing demand for bicycle storage on trains or adding service on the Ventura County and Antelope Valley lines during the Interstate 405 closures in 2011 and 2012.