Hollins University
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HOLLINS Instructor: Sampon-Nicolas, Annette V E R S I T Y FREN 271 (1): French Culture & Civilization # of Students: 3 Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS) Term Spring-Term 2018 Date Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the bo beside the alternative which most closely approximates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course. 1. My overall rating of the instructor £3! Very good. Good Adequate Poor Very poor 2. My rating of the instructor s Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness 3. The instructor s attitude toward ffl Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Negative the students 4. My attitude toward the instructor Very positive Positive Neutral Negative Very negative 5. My interest in the subject H Very much Increased Not changed Decreased Very much increased decreased 6. Stimulation of my thinking m Very high High Moderate Low Very low 7. Contribution to my education li Very high High Moderate Low Very low 8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult ED Difficult Average Easy Very easy 9. Fairness and adequacy of the 4 Very good Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor evaluation of my work 10. Amount of time I spent on Very high High Moderate Low Very low this course 11. My overall rating of the course £a Very good Good Adequate Poor Very poor Your maj or? C /M CM ?\ Your approximate cumulative grade-point average? is Your class level? ' dV y Grade you expect to receive in this course? iX Comments:-Ik ,W. w W. k ' WW\ ' Instructor: Sampon-Nicolas, Annette HOLLINS FREN 271 (1): French Culture & Civilization UNIVERSITY # of Students: 3 Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS) Term Spring-Term 2018 Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the box beside the alte ative which most closely approximates your opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course. Very poor 1. My overall rating of the Instructor QA ery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor 2. My rating of the instructor s GLVery good Good Adequate Poor effectiveness Negative 3. The instructor s attitude toward ery positive Positive Neutral Negative the students Very negative 4. My attitude toward the instructor [ T et positive Positive Neutral Negative Very much 5. My interest in the subject l ygry much Increased Not changed Decreased increased decreased Very low 6. Stimulation of my thinking i yefy high High Moderate Low Very low 7. Contribution to my education C yery high High Moderate Low Very easy 8. Difficulty level of the course Very difficult tffficult Average Easy Poor Very poor 9. Fairness and adequacy of the Veiy good Good Satisfactory evaluation of my work Very low 10. Amount of time I spent on eryhigh High Moderate Low this course Very poor 11. My overall rating of the course IH Very good Good Adequate Poor 3 do Your maior? Your approximate cumulative grade-point average? Your class level? C-Ti a > > Grade, yo e ect to receive in this course? Pi Comments: dj AA LakaM Instructor: Sampon-Nicolas, Annette HOLUNS FREN 271 (1): French Culture & Civilization UNIVERSITY # of Students: 3 Student Academic Opinion Survey (SAGS) Term Spring-Term 2018 Date Instructions: For each numbered question, please check the box beside the alternative which most closely approximates yom opinion. There is space at the bottom of the page in which you may further represent your opinions about this course. 1. My overall rating of the instructor & /eiy good Good Adequate Poor Very poor 2. My rating of the instructor s fcA/ery good Good Adequate Poor Very poor effectiveness Negative 3. The instructor s attitude toward tfVery positive Positive Neutral Negative the students Very negative 4. My attitude toward the instructor id ery positive Positive Neutral Negative Very much 5. My interest in the subject £l/very much Increased Not changed Decreased increased decreased Very low 6. Stimulation of my thinking fcfVery high High Moderate Low Very low 7. Contribution to my education EfVery high High Moderate Low 8. Difficulty level of the course ElVery difficult Difficult Average Easy Very easy Very poor 9. Fairness and adequacy of the '-cAery good Good Satisfactory Poor evaluation of my work Very low 10. Amount of time I spent on -E-Aery high High Moderate Low this course Very poor 11. My overall ratingstag of theof cthe urse c urse 0very goodGood Good AdequateAdequate PoorPoor u very pi Your major? Your approximate cumulative grade-point average? A Your class level? Grade you expect to receive in this cou se? Comments: Qa G (YUS rtA) A.