DOCSLIB.ORG

SMART Plan Mobility Today & Tomorrow

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MEETING OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 23, 2020, AT 2:00 PM TPO FISCAL PRIORITIES COMMITTEE STEPHEN P. CLARK CENTER 111 NW FIRST STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS Fiscal Priorities Committee A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chairman Dennis C. Moss C. REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC TO BE HEARD D. PRESENTATION(S) Vice Chairwoman Rebecca Sosa 1. MANAGED LANES PRESENTATION – FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT VI Voting Members 10-21-19 Deferred by the Fiscal Priorities Committee Daniella Levine Cava 11-4-19 Deferred by the Fiscal Priorities Committee Audrey M. Edmonson 12-2-19 Deferred by the Fiscal Priorities Committee Roberto Martell Xavier L. Suarez 2. BEACH CORRIDOR OF THE STRATEGIC MIAMI AREA RAPID TRANSIT (SMART) PLAN – PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDY Executive Director Aileen Bouclé, AICP E. DISCUSSION ITEM(S) 1. FPC DISCUSSION ON STATE FUNDING EQUITY ANALYSIS F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Contact Information 1. December 2, 2019 Ms. Zainab Salim G. ADJOURNMENT Board Administrator Miami-Dade TPO 111 NW First Street Suite 920 Miami, Florida 33128 305.375.4507 305.375.4950 (fax) [email protected] www.miamidadetpo.org SMART Plan Mobility Today & Tomorrow www.miamidadetpo.org It is the policy of the Miami-Dade TPO to comply with all of the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The facility is accessible. For sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or materials in accessible format, please call 305-375-4507 at least five business days in advance of the meeting. Project Overview – Project Location 1 Project Overview: Historical Timeline 1988 1993 1995 2002 2003 2004 2006 2015 2017 Miami Beach Transit East-West PTP ½ cent BayLink Phase 2 Miami- City of Miami Beach Corridor Beach Corridor Light Rail Corridors Multimodal sales tax Received Miami Beach Streetcar Rapid Transit Transit Feasibility Transitional Corridor (EIS) passed LPA Transportation Study Project Connection Study Analysis Study-Included and Miami- (BayLink) Study Study LRT Miami to Miami Beach Miami Beach Transportation (BayLink) Study Since 2004 New Issues: *Sea Level rise regulations *PortMiami Tunnel was constructed in median of MacArthur Bridge in previously reserved transit envelope *Downtown Miami development boom adding to downtown congestion. 2 2 Project Overview – Purpose and Need • Selected as one of the six SMART Plan Rapid Transit Corridors • Major east-west connection • High levels of traffic congestion • Needed to serve major regional economic engines 3 Tier 1 Analysis Results • Eliminated dedicated lane options south of I-395 due to congestion • Eliminated Aerial Cable Transit, Personal Rapid Transit and Heavy Rail technologies • Completed Corridor Analysis (Miami Avenue preferred over Aerial Cable Transit Biscayne or NE 2nd Avenue) • Recommended technologies to move forward into Tier 2 – Monorail – Metromover/APM – BRT/Express Bus Heavy Rail Transit – LRT/Streetcar PersonalX Rapid Transit 4 Tier 2 Technologies – Numbers Vary by Manufacturer and Future Specifications 5 Tier 2 Alternatives- Trunkline and Extensions TRUNK LINE (Bay Crossing from Herald Plaza/Museum Park Metromover station to Washington Avenue and 5th Street) MIAMIMIAMI MIAMI EXTENSIONEXTENSION BEACH FromFrom EXTENSION MetromoverMetromover From SchoolSchool Washington BoardBoard ExpressExpress VehiclesVehicles onon Avenue and StationStation toto N.N. ExistingExisting PeoplemoverPeoplemover 5th Street to MiamiMiami Convention AvenueAvenue andand Center area 41st41st StreetStreet 6 Project Alignments – Automated People Mover (APM) Automated People Mover (APM) 7 APM Miami Avenue APM adjacent to I-395 West Bridge APM Bay Crossing (MacArthur Causeway) APM Miami Beach (5th Street Median) *These renderings are representatives and not actual 8 Typical Sections- APM APM - North Miami Avenue and 5th Street sections APM – Trunkline/BayCrossing (MacArthur Causeway) 9 Project Alignments – Monorail Monorail 10 Monorail adjacent to I-395 West Bridge Monorail Bay Crossing (MacArthur Causeway) Monorail Miami Beach (5th Street Median) *These renderings are representatives and not actual 11 Typical Sections- Monorail Monorail - 5th Street section Monorail- Trunkline/BayCrossing (MacArthur Causeway) 12 Project Alignments – Light Rail/Streetcar (LRT) Light Rail Transit 13 LRT Miami Avenue LRT adjacent to I-395 West Bridge LRT Bay Crossing (MacArthur Causeway) LRT Miami Beach (5th Street Median) *These renderings are representatives and not actual 14 Typical Sections- LRT LRT Section- Washington Avenue 15 Project Alignments – Bus Rapid Transit Bus Rapid Transit I-195 option 10.8 miles/11 stations • I-395 option 6.6 miles/10 stations 16 Typical Sections- BRT 17 Tier 2 Evaluation Criteria Transit and Multimodal Performance Cost and Feasibility • Ridership • Capital Cost • Travel Time • Operations and Maintenance Cost • Interoperability/Modal Integration • Lifecycle Cost (Secondary Measure) • Passenger Capacity (Secondary Measure) • Resiliency (Secondary Measure) Environmental Effects • Time to Construct (Secondary Measure) • Natural Resources • Cultural Resources (Historic/Archaeological) • Aesthetics and Visual • Noise and Vibration • Traffic Impacts • Construction Impacts (Secondary Measure) 18 Evaluation Criteria • All Criteria Rated from Lower Performing to Higher Performing – Lower Cost/Impact = Higher Performance – Higher Environmental Impact = Lower Performance – Higher Ridership = Higher Performance – Slower Travel Time = Lower Performance Lower Performing Higher Performing 1 2 3 4 5 19 Evaluation Results: Ridership •2040 Ridership estimated using STOPS model V2.5 Technology Bay Crossing / Trunkline Bay Crossing+Miami (Herald/Museum Park- Extension+Beach Beach) Extension APM (One-Seat Ride)1 13,000 - 19,400 32,300 - 48,500 APM (Transfer)1 10,200 - 15,400 27,900 - 41,900 Monorail1 10,200 - 15,400 27,900 - 41,900 LRT2 8,000 - 12,000 24,800 - 37,200 BRT I-3953 N/A 11,500 - 21,400 BRT I-1953 N/A 11,500 - 21,400 1 May add 3,000 – 5,400 riders from parallel/duplicate routes 113, 119, 120 2 Added ridership would be lower due to walk distance from Omni/Herald bus terminal 3 See project alignment description 20 Evaluation Results: Transit Travel Time Travel Time (Minutes)** APM EB WB Trunkline (Herald Plaza - Beach) 6 6 Beach Express (Gov Ctr - Beach) 13 13 APM NB SB Miami Extension (Gov Ctr - Design District) 22 17* Design District Express (Gov Ctr - Design District) 15 15 Monorail EB WB Trunkline (Herald Plaza - Beach) 6 6 Gov Ctr – Herald Plaza (Express) 7 7 LRT EB WB Design District - Bay Crossing - Beach 24 23 BRT EB WB OTV - Beach via I-195 25 21 OTV - Beach via I-395 22 18 * NB follows downtown loop counterclockwise **These times do not include transfer time. However, transfer times was included in ridership estimates 21 Evaluation Results: Cost and Feasibility- 2019$ APM LRT Monorail BRT I-395** BRT I-195** Capital Cost Total 2019 $ $1,022,250,000 $1,136,900,000 $1,079,300,000 $366,800,000 $244,200,000 Trunkline APM LRT Monorail N/A N/A Beach Extension Bus LRT Bus N/A N/A Midtown Extension APM LRT APM N/A N/A Operations and Maintenance Cost Annual Total (2019 $) $19,100,000 $17,600,000 $16,500,000 $5,500,000 $6,100,000 30 Year Discounted Lifecycle Cost Capital, O&M & Major $1,444,000,000 $1,506,000,000 $1,440,000,000 $499,000,000 $392,000,000 Maintenance Elevated guideway and Limited opportunity to Elevated guideway and Mitigation of Sea Level No mitigation of sea level No mitigation of sea level Resiliency stations provides mitigation mitigate sea level rise stations provides mitigation Rise Impacts rise risks rise risks of predicted sea level rise. outside of Bay Crossing of predicted sea level rise. Design-Bid-Build Delivery Time to Construct 48 54 48 33 - 36 33 - 36 (Months) *All costs include contingency 20-25% **BRT- Continuous BRT system from Downtown To Beach via I-395/Washington or via I-195/Collins Avenue 22 Evaluation Results: Project Cost 2019$- Total and Segments O & M (millions) APM Monorail LRT BRT (I-195) BRT (I-395) Total $19.1 $16.5 $17.6 $6.1 $5.5 Trunkline Only $9.9 $7.2 $9.1 N/A N/A Capital Cost No Build APM Monorail LRT BRT (I-195) BRT (I-395) (millions) Total $0 $1,022.3 $1,079.3 $1,136.9 $244.2 $366.8 Trunkline Only $0 $631.6 $681.7 $647.5/$732.3* N/A N/A *Capital Cost for LRT Trunkline with and without Acquisition for Maintenance and Storage Facility (estimated Cost $85 Million – No Land Availability for 6AC) 23 Evaluation Results: Environmental Effects- Total Project APM LRT Monorail BRT-I-395 BRT-I-195 Direct Impacts to seagrass, coral Significant impacts to coral. Bridge widening on I-195 Direct Impacts to seagrass, coral and mangrove; additional Water Resources, Habitat Direct impacts to seagrass, coral Permitting and mitigation would would result in seagrass and mangrove; small increase in indirect (shading) impacts; Natural Resources and mangroves be challenging-significant risk to impacts that would require and Animals impervious surface greater increase in impervious cost & duration of project. permitting and mitigation. surface Cultural # of Listed/Eligible Historic/Archaeological 34 144 33 2 0 Resources Resources Elevated guideway / stations Aesthetics and Elevated guideway / stations impact views in Bay Crossing Elevated guideway / stations Buses/stops will have limited Buses/stops will have Views and Streetscape Visual impact views and streetscape segment; less impact in at- impact views and streetscape impact on view shed limited impact on view shed grade segments 5 Moderate/24 Severe
Recommended publications
  • The Las Vegas Monorail, an Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems Within the Resort Corridor

    The Las Vegas Monorail, an Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems Within the Resort Corridor

    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 4-1999 The Las Vegas Monorail, an innovative solution for public transportation problems within the resort corridor Cam C. Walker University of Nevada Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Public Administration Commons Repository Citation Walker, Cam C., "The Las Vegas Monorail, an innovative solution for public transportation problems within the resort corridor" (1999). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1439111 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Monorail 1 THE LAS VEGAS MONORAIL, AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION The Las Vegas Monorail: An Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems within the Resort Corridor By Cam C. Walker Bachelor of Science Brigham Young
  • N E W Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) from MISTER Ltd., Poland

    N E W Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) from MISTER Ltd., Poland

    www.mist-er.com, [email protected] N E W Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) from MISTER Ltd., Poland Albert Einstein : "Imagination is more important than knowledge." Metropolitan Individual System of Transportation on an Elevated Rail Metropolitan Individual System of Transportation on an Elevated Rail PRT development proposal and business opportunity for the 1-st city to build a MISTER system MISTER Ltd ul. Niedzialkowskiego 1/4 45−085 Opole Poland Phone: +48 (0) 793 044 555 [email protected] www.mist-er.com Index • Introduction • The Problem • Our Solution • Company and Team • Competition • The Numbers • Prototype - Poland • Money and Business MISTER prototype demonstrated • Technical Issues in Opole City square in Sept • Summary 2007 3 USA proposal 2008-11 www.mist-er.com Introduction Elevator Message: “MISTER is the answer for every city in the world with traffic jams and transportation problems” MISTER offers: • A new and highly innovative solution MISTER vehicle, track and • A patented version of PRT station design © • Several advantages over other PRT designs • An opportunity for excellent ROI cia ownership interest in a city system as well as a global company 4 USA proposal 2008-11 www.mist-er.com Business offer and city benefits Introduction 1. $50 million for 5 km (3 miles) pilot system and certification track within 2-3 years (less than an average city parking structure) 2. Return of entire investment within 2 to 5 years of operation start. 3. Very limited risk and cost, as compared to investing in current solutions like parkings, infrastructure and transit systems (bus, rail). 4.
  • Five-Year Implementation Plan of the People’S Transportation Plan

    Five-Year Implementation Plan of the People’S Transportation Plan

    Five-Year Implementation Plan of the People’s Transportation Plan Eighth Annual Update ∙ Covering Fiscal Years 2020–2025 CITIZENS’ INDEPENDENT TRANSPORTATION MOVINGMOVINGMOVING TRUST FORWARDFORWARDFORWARD PTP Five-Year Plan Update Five-Year Implementation Plan of the People’s Transportation Plan (PTP) Eighth Annual Update – Covering Fiscal Years 2020 to 2025 Citizens’ Independent Transportation Trust and Miami-Dade County Chairman’s Message As I embark on my new role as the Chairman of the Citizens’ Independent Transportation Trust (Transportation Trust), I’m reminded that Miami-Dade County is a great place to live, work and play. Public Transportation plays a vital role in both the economic and physical health of our residents and offers great benefits to the community. The Transportation Trust is dedicated to its core responsibilities-- to provide oversight of the People’s Transportation Plan (PTP) funds and develop proactive plans that meet the challenges of improving public transportation in our community. My fellow Trust Members and I remain committed in safeguarding the public’s money and we work diligently to maintain their confidence ensuring that the half-penny transportation Surtax funds are spent as intended. We are excited about the accomplishments made with the half-penny Surtax thus far and look forward to continuing to fulfill our remaining promises by implementing the Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) Plan. Miami-Dade County desires to provide a public transportation system that keeps pace with the needs of this growing population and their transportation needs. I serve on the Transportation Trust because I believe in the potential of this community and residents of Miami-Dade County deserve a first-class transportation system.
  • Transit Service Design Guidelines

    Transit Service Design Guidelines

    Transit Service Design Guidelines Department of Rail and Public Transportation November 2008 Transit Service Design Guidelines Why were these guidelines for new transit service developed? In FY2008 alone, six communities in Virginia contacted the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation about starting new transit service in their community. They and many other communities throughout Virginia are interested in learning how new transit services can enhance travel choices and mobility and help to achieve other goals, such as quality of life, economic opportunity, and environmental quality. They have heard about or seen successful transit systems in other parts of the state, the nation, or the world, and wonder how similar systems might serve their communities. They need objective and understandable information about transit and whether it might be appropriate for them. These guidelines will help local governments, transit providers and citizens better understand the types of transit systems and services that are available to meet community and regional transportation needs. The guidelines also help the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) in making recommendations to the Commonwealth Transportation Board for transit investments, by 1) providing information on the types of systems or services that are best matched to community needs and local land use decisions, and 2) ensuring that resources are used effectively to achieve local, regional, and Commonwealth goals. Who were these guidelines developed for? These guidelines are intended for three different audiences: local governments, transit providers and citizens. Therefore, some will choose to read the entire document while others may only be interested in certain sections.
  • Walt Disney World Resort Transportation Guide

    Walt Disney World Resort Transportation Guide

    HOW TO TRAVEL AROUND PROPERTY UPDATED 03/04/18 FROM DISNEY’S ALL-STAR RESORTS LEGEND: BUS MONORAIL WATERCRAFT WALK TRANSFER Advise Guests to prepare for a sufficient amount of travel time. Taxi service is available at all of our resorts and theme parks. Pay attention to operating hours, inclement weather and downtimes. Do not give this guide to Guests. HOW TO GET TO MAGIC KINGDOM AREA MAGIC KINGDOM to MAGIC KINGDOM CONTEMPORARY to MAGIC KINGDOM or to CONTEMPORARY FORT WILDERNESS to MAGIC KINGDOM to FORT WILDERNESS GRAND FLORIDIAN to MAGIC KINGDOM or to GRAND FLORIDIAN POLYNESIAN VILLAGE to MAGIC KINGDOM or to POLYNESIAN VILLAGE WILDERNESS LODGE to MAGIC KINGDOM or to WILDERNESS LODGE SHADES OF GREEN to MAGIC KINGDOM or to TTC to SHADES OF GREEN MAGIC KINGDOM to CONTEMPORARY to TRANSPORTATION & TICKET CENTER (TTC) RESORTS MONORAIL ROUTE to POLYNESIAN VILLAGE to GRAND FLORIDIAN to MAGIC KINGDOM HOW TO GET TO EPCOT AREA EPCOT to EPCOT BOARDWALK to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to BOARDWALK SWAN & DOLPHIN HOTELS to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to SWAN & DOLPHIN HOTELS YACHT & BEACH CLUB to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to YACHT & BEACH CLUB HOW TO GET TO HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS AREA HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS ART OF ANIMATION to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to ART OF ANIMATION CARIBBEAN BEACH to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to CARIBBEAN BEACH POP CENTURY to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to POP CENTURY HOW TO GET TO ANIMAL KINGDOM AREA ANIMAL KINGDOM to ANIMAL KINGDOM ANIMAL KINGDOM LODGE to ANIMAL KINGDOM to ANIMAL KINGDOM LODGE CORONADO SPRINGS to ANIMAL KINGDOM to CORONADO SPRINGS HOW TO GET TO DISNEY SPRINGS AREA DISNEY SPRINGS to DISNEY SPRINGS OLD KEY WEST to DISNEY SPRINGS or to OLD KEY WEST PORT ORLEANS to DISNEY SPRINGS or to PORT ORLEANS SARATOGA SPRINGS to DISNEY SPRINGS or or to SARATOGA SPRINGS HOW TO GET TO WATERPARKS AND MINI GOLF BLIZZARD BEACH to BLIZZARD BEACH FANTASIA GARDENS MINI GOLF to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to SWAN & DOLPHIN to F.
  • SEOPW Redevelopment Plan

    SEOPW Redevelopment Plan

    NOVEMBER 2004 by Dover Kohl & Partners FINAL UPDATE MAY 2009 by the City of Miami Planning Department (Ver. 2.0) i Table of Contents for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan November 2004 Final Updated May 2009 Section ONE Introduction Page 2 • This Document 2 • Topics Frequently Asked from Neighborhood Stakeholders 2 • Historical Context Page 3 • 21st Century Context Page 5 • The Potential: A Livable City 5 • History of the CRA Page 6 • Revised Boundaries 6 • Revisions from the Original CRA Redevelopment Plan Page 7 • Findings of Necessity Page 9 • New Legal Description Section TWO Goals and Guiding Principles Page 11 • Redevelopment Goals #1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles #3 Housing: Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability #4 Creating Jobs within the Community #5 Promotion & Marketing of the Community #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents Page 13 • Guiding Principles 1. The community as a whole has to be livable. Land uses and transportation systems must be coordinated with each other. 2. The neighborhood has to retain access to affordable housing even as the neighborhood becomes more desirable to households with greater means. 3. There must be variety in housing options. ii 4. There must be variety in job options. 5. Walking within the neighborhood must be accessible, safe, and pleasant. 6. Local cultural events, institutions, and businesses are to be promoted. Section TWO 7. The City and County must provide access to small parks and green spaces of an urban (continued) character. 8. Older buildings that embody the area’s cultural past should be restored.
  • SR-836/I-395/I-95) Toi-95 Southbound SR-836 Westbound I-95 Pavement Reconstruction SR-836/I-395 from West Causeway Bridge of I-95 to Macarthur

    SR-836/I-395/I-95) Toi-95 Southbound SR-836 Westbound I-95 Pavement Reconstruction SR-836/I-395 from West Causeway Bridge of I-95 to Macarthur

    community | safety | mobility | maintainability Technical Volume 1: Technical Proposal Technical 1: Volume Technical SR-836 I-95 I-95 SR-836/I-395 Southbound to SR-836 Westbound Southbound SR-836 to Reconstruction Pavement from West of NW 17th Avenue to Midtown Interchange (SR-836/I-395/I-95) Interchange Midtown to of NW 17th Avenue West from from West of I-95 to MacArthur of I-95 to Bridge Causeway West from FDOT DISTRICT 6 SR-836/I-395/I-95 Technical Financial Projects Number(s): I-395 Reconstruction 251688-1-52-01 (F.A.P. 3951-501-1) I-95 Pavement Reconstruction 429300-2-52-01 (F.A.P. 0951-685-1) Volume 1: I-95 SB to SR-836 WB Connector 423126-2-52-01 MDX 423126-1-52-01 Technical Proposal Miami Dade Water & Sewer 251688-1-56-02 MDX Work Program Number: 83611 Contract Number: E-6J53 Copy Transmittal Letter Design and Construction Approach INTRODUCTION 1. Community – Connect communities The SR-836/I-395/I-95 project presents a unique and 2. Safety – Enhance safety extraordinary opportunity to transform Miami by reconnecting 3. Mobility – Improve mobility communities that were once divided, creating a safer 4. Maintainability – Deliver maintainable solutions environment for pedestrian and vehicular traffic, solving mobility These four fundamental objectives served as our guiding challenges that have inhibited traffic for many years, and principles as we developed a comprehensive project approach, developing a cohesive maintenance plan that will preserve Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs), and Aesthetic Project these community enhancements for years to come. This legacy Technical Enhancements (APTEs).
  • Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) New Jersey

    Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) New Jersey

    Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) for New Jersey By ORF 467 Transportation Systems Analysis, Fall 2004/05 Princeton University Prof. Alain L. Kornhauser Nkonye Okoh Mathe Y. Mosny Shawn Woodruff Rachel M. Blair Jeffery R Jones James H. Cong Jessica Blankshain Mike Daylamani Diana M. Zakem Darius A Craton Michael R Eber Matthew M Lauria Bradford Lyman M Martin-Easton Robert M Bauer Neset I Pirkul Megan L. Bernard Eugene Gokhvat Nike Lawrence Charles Wiggins Table of Contents: Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction to Personal Rapid Transit .......................................................................................... 3 New Jersey Coastline Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Burlington County (M. Mosney '06) ..............................................................................................6 Monmouth County (M. Bernard '06 & N. Pirkul '05) .....................................................................9 Hunterdon County (S. Woodruff GS .......................................................................................... 24 Mercer County (M. Martin-Easton '05) ........................................................................................31 Union County (B. Chu '05) ...........................................................................................................37 Cape May County (M. Eber '06) …...............................................................................................42
  • Resolution No. R-52-16

    Resolution No. R-52-16

    Resolution No. R-52-16 ___ R-52-16 Barbara J. Jordan Sally A. Heyman aye absent Five Year Implementation Plan of the Peoples Transportation Plan (PTP) Fourth Annual Update • Covering Fiscal Years 2015-2020 CITIZENS’ INDEPENDENT TRANSPORTATION MOVINGMOVINMOMOVINGMOVIN TRUST FORWARDFORWARFORFORWARDFORWWAR PTP FIVE YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN • FY 2015-2020 B MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA PTPFiveͲYearPlanUpdate Five-Year Implementation Plan of the People’s Transportation Plan (PTP) Fourth Annual Update – Covering Fiscal Years 2015 to 2020 Citizens’IndependentTransportationTrust andMiamiͲDadeCounty 1 PTP FIVE YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN • FY 2015-2020 September 1, 2015 Dear Mayor, Commissioners, Residents and Stakeholders: The purpose of this leƩer is to transmit the Five-Year ImplementaƟon Plan of the People’s TransportaƟon Plan (PTP). This is the fourth update of the Plan as established by the Board of County Commissioners under Ordinance 02-116. The Five-Year Plan Update represents an evaluaƟon of progress made in implemenƟng projects included in the PTP and a schedule of projected project expenditures over the next Įve years. The project status reports, unless otherwise noted, are as of June 30, 2014. The Plan represents an important component of the Trust’s role in monitoring expenditures of PTP funds. In addiƟon to this role the Trust is also proacƟvely engaged in advancing projects in all of the PTP Corridors. A major milestone in that initiaƟve was the 2015 TransportaƟon Summit which was presented in January 2015 in conjuncƟon with Mayor Carlos. A. Gimenez, the Board of County Commissioners and the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce. The Summit, Advancing the Community’s Vision for Public Transportation, was aƩended by over 500 community leaders and has catalyzed community support for improving transit and transportaƟon in our community.
  • Part Ii a Personal Rapid Transit System

    Part Ii a Personal Rapid Transit System

    PART II A PERSONAL RAPID Author: Marcus Ekström TRANSIT SYSTEM 6. Introduction 6.1 Transportation and current 6.2 Problematization and study, design guidelines, and a detailed study on a PRT station at the waterfront. Within the work of action secondary question this thesis the design guidelines will be presented in this individual part, and the comprehensive and As much of today’s literature suggests, a shift in Visual encroachment in urban planning is vital detailed study will appear in our common proposal public transit is one of several needed actions to when discussing elevated architecture which comes for Cherry Beach. change people’s direct and indirect demand of with a Personal Rapid Transit system. These new oil. The shift has to be appealing to those who environments need to be designed with care both see today’s public transit as slow, non-reliable, for the users in terms of security and liveliness as 6.4 Assessment of sources in-convenient, and expensive, but none the least well as for the general public using the city and to those who see the car as the primary mode of the urban environment. It is also important how Finding materials to this study has not been transportation. Thus, a new transit system has these new transit solutions are introduced and if difficult but the problem with the sources is that to be quick, environmentally friendly, reliable, a suitable order can be identified to implement most of them come from the same groups and convenient, and cheap - hence what people demand them in different urban environments to gain as it is business for these companies that deal and the opposite of today’s public transit.
  • Transportation Improvement Program

    Transportation Improvement Program

    2016 Transportation Improvement Program TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2015/2016 to 2019/2020 TIP Citizen’s Version METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR THE MIAMI URBANIZED AREA 2016 – 2020 CITIZENS TIP This document was prepared by the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Miami Urbanized Area in collaboration with the Florida Department of Transportation; Miami-Dade Expressway Authority; Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise; South Florida Regional Transportation Authority; Miami-Dade County Public Works and Waste Management Department; Miami-Dade County Office of Strategic Business Management; Miami-Dade Transit Agency; Miami-Dade County Aviation Department; Miami-Dade Seaport Department; Miami-Dade League of Cities; Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources; and the Miami-Dade County Developmental Impact Committee. The Miami-Dade MPO complies with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states: No person in the United States shall, on grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. It is also the policy of the Miami-Dade MPO to comply with all of the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. For materials in accessible format please call (305) 375-4507. The preparation of this report has been financed in part from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and/or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the State Planning and Research Program (Section 505 of Title 23, U.S. Code) and Miami-Dade County, Florida. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S.
  • Miami DDA Master Plan

    Miami DDA Master Plan

    DOWNTOWN MIAMI DWNTWN MIAMI... Epicenter of the Americas 2025 Downtown Miami Master Plan 9 200 ber Octo TABLE OF CONTENTS: INTRODUCTION 05 About the Downtown Development Authority 06 Master Plan Overview 06 Foundation 06 Districts 08 Principles 09 Considerations 09 Acknowledgements 10 How to Use this Document 12 VISION 13 Vision Statement 14 GOALS 15 1. Enhance our Position as the Business and 19 Cultural Epicenter of the Americas 2. Leverage our Beautiful and Iconic Tropical Waterfront 27 3. Elevate our Grand Boulevards to Prominence 37 4. Create Great Streets and Community Spaces 45 5. Promote Transit and Regional Connectivity 53 IMPLEMENTATION 61 Process 62 Matrix 63 CONCLUSION 69 APPENDIX 71 Burle Marx Streetscape Miami DDA DOWNTOWN MIAMI MASTER PLAN 2025 2025 DOWNTOWN MIAMI... EPICENTER OF THE AMERICAS 2 3 INTRODUCTION About the DDA Master Plan Overview Foundation Districts Principles Considerations Acknowledgements How to Use the Document DOWNTOWN MIAMI MASTER PLAN 2025 4 Introduction Introduction ABOUT THE DDA FOUNDATION “Roadmap to Success” Downtown Master Plan Study Miami 21 (Duany Plater-Zyberk): 2009 A Greenprint for Our Future: The Miami-Dade Street CRA Master Plans (Dover Kohl / Zyscovich): (Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce (GMCoC), Tree Master Plan (Miami-Dade County Community 2004 / 2006 Miami 21’s mission is to overhaul the City of Miami’s The Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) is The Master Plan stands on a foundation of various New World Center (NWC) Committee): 2009 Image Advisory Board): 2007 a quasi-independent