DOCSLIB.ORG

Ruby Pipeline Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BLM Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-0000-2013-0001-EIS Ruby Pipeline Project Office NevadaState November 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Nevada State Office Reno, Nevada FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DOI-BLM-NV-0000-2013-0001-EIS Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Nevada State Office, Reno, Nevada Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Forest Service, Fremont-Winema National Forest Nevada Department of Wildlife Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Wyoming Game and Fish Department Project Location: Lincoln & Uinta Counties, WY Box Elder, Cache & Rich Counties, UT Elko, Humboldt & Washoe Counties, NV Lake & Klamath Counties, OR Abstract: This Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Ruby Pipeline Project was prepared by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in response to a ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (case nos. 10-72356, 10-72552, 10-72762, 10-72768, and 10-72775). The ruling directed the BLM to undertake a revised cumulative effects analysis of the Ruby Pipeline Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) as it related to the cumulative loss of sagebrush steppe vegetation and habitat. This Final SEIS contains supplemental information about the original and present condition of the sagebrush steppe vegetation and habitat, and analyzes the cumulative impacts of the Ruby Pipeline Project based on the supplemental information and comments on the Draft SEIS from interested stakeholders. This Final SEIS tiers to and incorporates by reference the information and analyses contained in the Ruby Pipeline Project Final EIS. For Further Information Mark Mackiewicz, PMP, National Project Manager Contact: mail: BLM Price Field Office 125 South 600 West Price, Utah 84501 email: [email protected] phone: (435) 636-3616 FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT Lincoln & Uinta Counties, WY Box Elder, Cache & Rich Counties, UT Elko, Humboldt & Washoe Counties, NV Lake & Klamath Counties, OR U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Nevada State Office Reno, Nevada DOI-BLM-NV-0000-2013-0001-EIS November 2013 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Ruby Pipeline Project CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Decision to Be Made ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Cumulative Actions ............................................................................................................................ 5 Affected Environment (and the Influence of Past Actions on the Environment) ...............16 Environmental Effects (of Present and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions) ..............25 Summary of Impacts (of Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions) ......34 Consultation and Coordination ...................................................................................................................37 Native American Consultation ......................................................................................................37 Agency Consultation ........................................................................................................................40 Public Outreach .................................................................................................................................41 Libraries and Federal Offices that Received a Copy of the Ruby Draft and Final SEIS ...................42 References ........................................................................................................................................................45 Index ...............................................................................................................................................................55 List of Preparers ..............................................................................................................................................59 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Present and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions within the Cumulative Impact Area ........ 5 Table 2 – Cumulative Impact Acreages .....................................................................................................23 Table 3 – Native American Consultation ..................................................................................................34 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Project Location Map ................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 – Historic Extent of Sagebrush Steppe within the Cumulative Impact Area ....................17 Figure 3 – Current Extent of Sagebrush Steppe within the Cumulative Impact Area ....................18 APPENDICES Appendix A – Comment and Response Document i Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Ruby Pipeline Project ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BLM Bureau of Land Management Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation Certificate Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations EIS Environmental Impact Statement FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Final EIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service kV kilovolt NEPA National Environmental Policy Act PGH preliminary general habitat POD Plan of Development PPH preliminary priority habitat ROD Record of Decision Ruby Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C. SEIS Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement USFS U.S. Forest Service WWEC West-wide Energy Corridor ii Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Ruby Pipeline Project INTRODUCTION This DraftFinal Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Ruby Pipeline Project was prepared by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in response to a ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (case nos. 10-72356, 10-72552, 10-72762, 10-72768, and 10-72775). The ruling directed the BLM to undertake a revised cumulative effects analysis of the Ruby Pipeline Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) as it related to the cumulative loss of sagebrush steppe vegetation and habitat. Because this cumulative effects analysis is intended to supplement only a specific part of the cumulative effects analysis in the Ruby Pipeline Project Final EIS, (Final EIS), it has been prepared in a manner consistent with that goal. This analysis tiers to and incorporates by reference the information and analyses contained in the Ruby Pipeline Project Final EIS. The Ruby Pipeline Project is a 678-mile-long, 42-inch-diameter interstate natural gas pipeline beginning near Opal, Wyoming, running through northern Utah and northern Nevada, and terminating near Malin, Oregon (see Figure 1). The project crosses about 368 miles of federal land. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the federal agency responsible for evaluating applications to construct and operate interstate natural gas pipeline facilities. Certificates are issued under Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act if the FERC determines that the project is required for the public convenience and necessity. On January 27, 2009, Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C. (Ruby) filed an application with the FERC for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (Certificate) for its Ruby Pipeline Project. The FERC prepared an EIS to assess the environmental impact associated with the proposed project. The BLM, Bureau of Reclamation, (Reclamation), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), U.S. Forest Service, (USFS), Natural Resource Conservation Service, Army Corps of Engineers, Utah Public Lands Policy Coordination Office, and Lincoln County (Wyoming) Board of County Commissioners participated as cooperating agencies in the preparation of the EIS because of jurisdiction over part of the project area or because of special expertise with respect to environmental resources in the project area. The BLM adopted the EIS in accordance with Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 1506.3 to meet its responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Ruby Pipeline Project was approved by the FERC on April 5, 2010 and the Right-of-Way Grant and Plan of Development (POD) were approved by a BLM Record of Decision (ROD) on July 12, 2010. The BLM Nevada State Director, as the designated federal official, signed the ROD and authorized the right-of-way for the construction, operation, maintenance, and termination of the pipeline and associated facilities across lands under jurisdiction of the BLM, the U.S. Forest Service, the Bureau ofUSFS, Reclamation, and the FWS in the Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon. Construction started in the summer of 2010 and was completed in the summer of 2011. The pipeline went into service on July 28, 2011. 1 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Ruby Pipeline Project 2 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Ruby Pipeline Project 3 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Ruby Pipeline Project
Recommended publications
  • Plant List Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail

    Plant List Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail

    *Non-native Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail Plant List as of 7/12/2016 compiled by Tanya Harvey T24S.R3E.S33;T25S.R3E.S4 westerncascades.com FERNS & ALLIES Pseudotsuga menziesii Ribes lacustre Athyriaceae Tsuga heterophylla Ribes sanguineum Athyrium filix-femina Tsuga mertensiana Ribes viscosissimum Cystopteridaceae Taxaceae Rhamnaceae Cystopteris fragilis Taxus brevifolia Ceanothus velutinus Dennstaedtiaceae TREES & SHRUBS: DICOTS Rosaceae Pteridium aquilinum Adoxaceae Amelanchier alnifolia Dryopteridaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea Holodiscus discolor Polystichum imbricans (Sambucus mexicana, S. cerulea) Prunus emarginata (Polystichum munitum var. imbricans) Sambucus racemosa Rosa gymnocarpa Polystichum lonchitis Berberidaceae Rubus lasiococcus Polystichum munitum Berberis aquifolium (Mahonia aquifolium) Rubus leucodermis Equisetaceae Berberis nervosa Rubus nivalis Equisetum arvense (Mahonia nervosa) Rubus parviflorus Ophioglossaceae Betulaceae Botrychium simplex Rubus ursinus Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Sceptridium multifidum (Alnus sinuata) Sorbus scopulina (Botrychium multifidum) Caprifoliaceae Spiraea douglasii Polypodiaceae Lonicera ciliosa Salicaceae Polypodium hesperium Lonicera conjugialis Populus tremuloides Pteridaceae Symphoricarpos albus Salix geyeriana Aspidotis densa Symphoricarpos mollis Salix scouleriana Cheilanthes gracillima (Symphoricarpos hesperius) Salix sitchensis Cryptogramma acrostichoides Celastraceae Salix sp. (Cryptogramma crispa) Paxistima myrsinites Sapindaceae Selaginellaceae (Pachystima myrsinites)
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O

    Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O

    ALPLAINS 2013 SEED CATALOG P.O. BOX 489, KIOWA, CO 80117-0489, U.S.A. Three ways to contact us: FAX: (303) 621-2864 (24 HRS.) email: [email protected] website: www.alplains.com Dear Growing Friends: Welcome to our 23rd annual seed catalog! The summer of 2012 was long, hot and brutal, with drought afflicting most of the U.S. Most of my botanical explorations were restricted to Idaho, Wash- ington, Oregon and northern California but even there moisture was below average. In a year like this, seeps, swales, springs, vestigial snowbanks and localized rainstorms became much more important in my search for seeding plants. On the Snake River Plains of southern Idaho and the scab- lands of eastern Washington, early bloomers such as Viola beckwithii, V. trinervata, Ranunculus glaberrimus, Ranunculus andersonii, Fritillaria pudica and Primula cusickiana put on quite a show in mid-April but many populations could not set seed. In northern Idaho, Erythronium idahoense flowered extensively, whole meadows were covered with thousands of the creamy, pendant blossoms. One of my most satisfying finds in the Hells Canyon area had to be Sedum valens. The tiny glaucous rosettes, surround- ed by a ring of red leaves, are a succulent connoisseur’s dream. Higher up, the brilliant blue spikes of Synthyris missurica punctuated the canyon walls. In southern Oregon, the brilliant red spikes of Pedicularis densiflora lit up the Siskiyou forest floor. Further north in Oregon, large populations of Erythronium elegans, Erythronium oregonum ssp. leucandrum, Erythro- nium revolutum, trilliums and sedums provided wonderful picture-taking opportunities. Eriogonum species did well despite the drought, many of them true xerics.
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park

    Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park

    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
  • Protocol Information

    Protocol Information

    Protocol Information Dave Skinner PMC Farm Manager Pullman Plant Materials Center Room 104 Hulbert Hall WSU Pullman, Washington 99163-6211 509-335-9689 509-335-2940 Fax [email protected] Family Scientific Name: Apiaceae Family Common Name: Parsley or Carrot Scientific Name: Perideridia gairdneri (Hook. & Arn.) Mathias Common Name: Gairdner's yampah, Western yampah, False caraway Species Code: PEGA3 Ecotype: Paradise Creek drainage near Pullman, Washington. General Distribution: Western North America from British Columbia east to Saskatchewan and south to New Mexico. Mean annual precipitation range is 14-24 inches (USDA NRCS 2006). In eastern Washington it is usually found in open mesic meadows and open forest. Wetland status is FACU (US Fish and Wildlife Service 1988). Propagation Goal: Plants Propagation Method: Seed Product Type: Container (plug) Time To Grow: 2 Years Propagule Collection: Fruit is a schizocarp. Seed is collected in September or early October when the inflorescence is dry and the seeds are brown in color. Seed can be stripped from the inflorescence or the entire inflorescence can be clipped from the plant. Harvested seed is stored in paper bags at room temperature until cleaned. 400,000 seeds/lb (USDA NRCS 2006). Propagule Processing: The inflorescence is rubbed by hand to free the seed, then cleaned with an air column separator. Clean seed is stored in controlled conditions at 40 degrees Fahrenheit and 40% relative humidity. Pre-Planting Treatments: Unpublished data from trials conducted at the Pullman Plant Materials Center revealed that no germination occurred without stratification or with 30 days stratification. 60 days of cold, moist stratification resulted in 38% germination.
  • A Simple Gis Approach to Predicting Rare Plant Habitat: North Central Rocky Mountains, United States Forest Service, Region One

    A Simple Gis Approach to Predicting Rare Plant Habitat: North Central Rocky Mountains, United States Forest Service, Region One

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE Erin Elizabeth Nock The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Nock, Erin Elizabeth, "A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE" (2008). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 37. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE By Erin Elizabeth Nock Bachelor of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2002 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography, GIS/Cartography The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2008 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Anna Klene, Chair Department of Geography Dr. David Shively, Member Department of Geography Susan Rinehart, Outside Member United States Forest Service ii Nock, Erin, M.A., Spring 2008 Geography A Simple GIS Approach to Predicting Rare Plant Habitat: North Central Rocky Mountains, United States Forest Service, Region One Chairperson: Dr.
  • Contribution a L'etude De La Synthese De L'alliine De L'ail

    Contribution a L'etude De La Synthese De L'alliine De L'ail

    CONTRIBUTION A L’ETUDE DE LA SYNTHESE DE L’ALLIINE DE L’AIL BERENICE DETHIER TRAVAIL DE FIN D’ETUDES PRESENTE EN VUE DE L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME DE MASTER BIOINGENIEUR EN CHIMIE ET BIO-INDUSTRIES ANNEE ACADEMIQUE 2009-2010 (CO)-PROMOTEUR(S) : J.-P. WATHELET, E. HANON Toute reproduction du présent document, par quelque procédé que ce soit, ne peut être réalisée qu'avec l'autorisation de l'auteur et de l'autorité académique de Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech. Le présent document n'engage que son auteur. CONTRIBUTION A L’ETUDE DE LA SYNTHESE DE L’ALLIINE DE L’AIL BERENICE DETHIER TRAVAIL DE FIN D’ETUDES PRESENTE EN VUE DE L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME DE MASTER BIOINGENIEUR EN CHIMIE ET BIO-INDUSTRIES ANNEE ACADEMIQUE 2009-2010 (CO)-PROMOTEUR(S) : J.-P. WATHELET, E. HANON Remerciements Au terme de ce travail, je souhaite remercier l’ensemble des personnes qui ont contribué, de près ou de loin, à son élaboration. Celui-ci représentant l’aboutissement de mes études à la Faculté, je tiens également à saluer celles et ceux qui m’ont soutenu et encadré durant ces cinq années d’études. Mes remerciements vont dès lors à mes promoteurs, Emilien Hanon pour son intérêt pour mon sujet, ses précieux conseils, son soutien continu et sa sympathie, et Monsieur Jean-Paul Wathelet pour son encadrement, son enseignement et ses remarques constructives. Je remercie également les membres de mon jury pour l’intérêt porté à cette étude. Ma reconnaissance va ensuite à l’ensemble de l’unité de Chimie Générale et Organique pour l’accueil, le soutien, les conseils avisés et la bonne humeur.
  • A Comparative Study of the Allium Obtusum Comples

    A Comparative Study of the Allium Obtusum Comples

    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1983 A comparative study of the Allium obtusum comples William R. Mortola University of the Pacific Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mortola, William R.. (1983). A comparative study of the Allium obtusum comples. University of the Pacific, Thesis. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/2096 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ALLIUM OBTUSUM COMPLEX A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of the Pacific In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by William R. Mortola May 1983 This dissertation, written and submitted by Willi§m Richard Mortola is approved for recommendation to the Committee on Graduate Studies, University of the Pacific Dean of the School or Department Chairman: Dissertation Committee: Chairman •;=- J i i' ACKNOWLEDGMENTS t4uch gratitude is expressed to Dr, Dale 'II, McNeal for suggesting the problem investigated and for his par­ ticipation and supervision during all phases of this in­ vestigation, To Dr. Alice Hunter I am indebted for her reading of the manuscript and her identification of the insects collected during this study. To Dr, Steve Ander­ son I would like to extend appreciation for his reading of the manuscript and for making valuable suggestions.
  • Taxonomy, Origin and Importance of the Apiaceae Family

    Taxonomy, Origin and Importance of the Apiaceae Family

    1 TAXONOMY, ORIGIN AND IMPORTANCE OF THE APIACEAE FAMILY JEAN-PIERRE REDURON* Mulhouse, France The Apiaceae (or Umbelliferae) is a plant family comprising at the present time 466 genera and about 3800 species (Plunkett et al., 2018). It is distributed nearly worldwide, but is most diverse in temperate climatic areas, such as Eurasia and North America. It is quite rare in tropical humid regions where it is limited to high mountains. Mediterranean and arid climatic conditions favour high species diversification. The Apiaceae are present in nearly all types of habi- tats, from sea-level to alpine zones: aquatic biotopes, grasslands, grazed pas- tures, forests including their clearings and margins, cliffs, screes, rocky hills, open sandy and gravelly soils, steppes, cultivated fields, fallows, road sides and waste grounds. The largest number of genera, 289, and the largest generic endemism, 177, is found in Asia. There are 126 genera in Europe, but only 17 are en- demic. Africa has about the same total with 121 genera, where North Africa encompasses the largest occurrence of 82 genera, 13 of which are endemic. North and Central America have a fairly high level of diversity with 80 genera and 44 endemics, where South America accommodates less generic diversity with 35 genera, 15 of which are endemic. Oceania is home to 27 genera and 18 endemics (Plunkett et al., 2018). The Apiaceae family appears to have originated in Australasia (region including Australia, Tasmania, New Zealand, New Guinea, New Caledonia and several island groups), with this origin dated to the Late Cretaceous/ early Eocene, c.87 Ma (Nicolas and Plunkett, 2014).
  • Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County

    Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County

    A PPENDIX II Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX II. Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County Family Scientific Name Common Name FERN AND FERN ALLIES Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken family Pteridium aquilinum var.pubescens Bracken fern Dryopteridaceae Wood fern family Athyrium alpestre var. americanum Alpine lady fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Lady fern Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Cliff sword fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricate sword fern Polystichum kruckebergii Kruckeberg’s hollyfern Polystichum lonchitis Northern hollyfern Polystichum munitum Sword fern Equisetaceae Horsetail family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Scouring rush Equisetum laevigatum Smooth horsetail Isoetaceae Quillwort family Isoetes bolanderi Bolander’s quillwort Isoetes howellii Howell’s quillwort Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort Lycopodiaceae Club-moss family Lycopodiella inundata Bog club-moss Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita ssp. vestita Water clover Pilularia americana American pillwort Ophioglossaceae Adder’s-tongue family Botrychium multifidum Leathery grapefern Polypodiaceae Polypody family Polypodium hesperium Western polypody Pteridaceae Brake family Adiantum aleuticum Five-finger maidenhair Adiantum jordanii Common maidenhair fern Aspidotis densa Indian’s dream Cheilanthes cooperae Cooper’s
  • Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var

    Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var

    Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Cicuta douglasii poison parsnip 3 3 3 Cymopterus cinerarius alpine cymopterus 3 Cymopterus terebinthinus var. terebinth pteryxia 3 3 petraeus Ligusticum grayi Gray’s lovage 3 Lomatium dissectum fern-leaf 3 3 3 3 var. multifidum lomatium Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. desert biscuitroot 3 fimbriatum Plant List Lomatium mohavense Mojave parsley 3 3 Lomatium nevadense Nevada parsley 3 var. nevadense Lomatium rigidum prickly parsley 3 Taxonomy and nomenclature in this species list are based on Lomatium torreyi Sierra biscuitroot 3 western sweet- the Jepson Manual Online as of February 2011. Changes in Osmorhiza occidentalis 3 3 ADOXACEAE–ASTERACEAE cicely taxonomy and nomenclature are ongoing. Some site lists are Perideridia bolanderi Bolander’s 3 3 more complete than others; all of them should be considered a ssp. bolanderi yampah Lemmon’s work in progress. Species not native to California are designated Perideridia lemmonii 3 yampah with an asterisk (*). Please visit the Inyo National Forest and Perideridia parishii ssp. Parish’s yampah 3 3 Bureau of Land Management Bishop Resource Area websites latifolia for periodic updates. Podistera nevadensis Sierra podistera 3 Sphenosciadium ranger’s buttons 3 3 3 3 3 capitellatum APOCYNACEAE Dogbane Apocynum spreading 3 3 androsaemifolium dogbane Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Apocynum cannabinum hemp 3 3 ADOXACEAE Muskroot Humboldt Asclepias cryptoceras 3 Sambucus nigra ssp.
  • Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings

    Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings

    Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings 1 IDNHP Tracked Species Conservation Rankings Date USFS_ USFS_ USFS_ 2 Scientific Name Synonyms Common Name G-Rank S-Rank USFWS BLM Ranked R1 R4 R6 Abronia elliptica dwarf sand-verbena G5 S1 Feb-14 Abronia mellifera white sand-verbena G4 S1S2 Feb-16 Acorus americanus Acorus calamus var. americanus sweetflag G5 S2 Feb-16 Agastache cusickii Agastache cusickii var. parva Cusick's giant-hyssop G3G4 S2 Feb-14 Agoseris aurantiaca var. aurantiaca, Agoseris lackschewitzii pink agoseris G4 S1S2 4 S Feb-16 A. aurantiaca var. carnea Agrimonia striata roadside agrimonia G5 S1 Feb-16 Aliciella triodon Gilia triodon; G. leptomeria (in part) Coyote gilia G5 S1 Feb-20 Allenrolfea occidentalis Halostachys occidentalis iodinebush G4 S1 Feb-16 Allium aaseae Aase's Onion G2G3+ S2S3 2 Oct-11 Allium anceps Kellogg's Onion G4 S2S3 4 Feb-20 Allium columbianum Allium douglasii var. columbianum Columbia onion G3 S3 Feb-16 Allium madidum swamp onion G3 S3 S Allium tolmiei var. persimile Sevendevils Onion G4G5T3+ S3 4 S Allium validum tall swamp onion G4 S3 Allotropa virgata sugarstick G4 S3 S Amphidium californicum California amphidium moss G4 S1 Feb-16 Anacolia menziesii var. baueri Bauer's anacolia moss G4 TNR S2 Feb-20 Andreaea heinemannii Heinemann's andreaea moss G3G5 S1 Feb-14 Andromeda polifolia bog rosemary G5 S1 S Andromeda polifolia var. polifolia bog rosemary G5T5 S1 Feb-20 Anemone cylindrica long-fruit anemone G5 S1 Feb-20 Angelica kingii Great Basin angelica G4 S1 3 Mar-18 Antennaria arcuata meadow pussytoes G2 S1 Mar-18 Argemone munita ssp.