Exhibit E: Botanical and Wildlife Resources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exhibit E: Botanical and Wildlife Resources E5.0 BOTANICAL AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES This section on the terrestrial resources (plants and wildlife) associated with the Klamath Hydroelectric Project (Project) contains the following elements: • A description of the existing botanical and wildlife resources in the study area (see Figure E5.1-1) • A discussion of agency consultation related to terrestrial resources • Summaries of the studies conducted by PacifiCorp on wildlife and vegetation • A summary of proposed enhancement measures • A discussion of continuing impacts E5.1 HISTORICAL TERRESTRIAL RESOURCES The terrestrial resources in the Project vicinity historically have been affected by humans for a long period of time. Much of the information on Native American use of the Klamath River Canyon comes from the archaeological investigations conducted by Gleason (2001). Native Americans have been part of the Klamath River ecosystem for at least the last 7,500 years (Gleason, 2001). The Upland Takelma, Shasta, Klamath, and Modoc tribes all used various portions of the study area; the Yurok Tribe historically used the lands along the Lower Klamath River. Before settlement by Europeans, Native Americans affected terrestrial resources through clearing vegetation for villages; harvesting plants and animals for food, medicine, and other uses; and using fire to manage vegetation. The most intensive uses occurred close to the river. Apparently, many of the flat terraces in the canyon were used at one time or another as village- sized settlements. The existing Topsy Grade Road is near the site of a Native American trail. Beginning in about 1870, homesteaders established ranches in the Klamath River Canyon. Apparently, the canyon was mostly unoccupied by any Native American tribes after this time. The following sections provide a brief discussion of historical botanical and wildlife resources. E5.1.1 Botanical Resources Native Americans used botanical resources in the area in a variety of ways, and plant gathering was important for food most of the year. Numerous species were used, with foliage, fruit, geophytes, seeds/nuts, or other products being harvested (Gleason, 2001). Most of the plant resources were obtained from known localities that were visited regularly. Fires were used by the Native Americans for many reasons, but especially the management of various subsistence resources (Gleason, 2001). Fire frequently has been suggested as a major tool used by Native Americans, especially in oak habitat. Many of the ecosystems in arid areas (e.g., oak [Quercus spp.] woodlands, chaparral, and ponderosa pine [Pinus ponderosa] forests) are created and maintained by periodic wildfires (Franklin and Dyrness, 1988). Increased fire frequency generally would have increased oak productivity, decreased conifer germination, and decreased shrub undergrowth. © February 2004 PacifiCorp Exhibit E Wildlife and Botanical Resources.DOC Exhibit E Page 5-1 PacifiCorp Klamath Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2082 With European settlement, livestock grazing substantially increased in the open range of the study area. Livestock grazing has had the greatest impact on botanical resources in the area. Beginning in the late 1800s, cattle and sheep were grazed in the area; however, only cattle have been grazed since the early 1900s. By approximately 1890, commercial logging was initiated in the Klamath River Canyon vicinity. Evidence of previous logging is common throughout the area. As timber operations increased, logs were slid down adjacent slopes to the Klamath River and transported to the old town of Klamathon. In the upper portion of the canyon, ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) were the dominant tree species in the early 1900s, representing 22 to 60 percent of the trees (BLM, 1996). Approximately 100 years ago, white fir (Abies amabilis) represented less than 10 percent of the trees. In some areas, the combination of logging and fire suppression has decreased the numbers of ponderosa pine and increased the numbers grand fir (Abies grandis)) and white fir (BLM, 1996, 1998). The forest inventory data collected by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (BLM, 1996) in the Pokegama landscape analysis showed a 15 to 78 percent reduction of ponderosa pine by 1996 compared to historical densities. Other impacts of logging include the increase of chaparral species, such as manzanita (Acrtostaphylos patula), wedgeleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus cuneatus), and rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus), but also an increase in shrub decadence under the more dense overstory (BLM, 1996). The combination of logging, grazing, and general wildfire suppression has resulted in forest stands that have high levels of fire fuel (dense and decadent shrubs and overstocked forests with abundant dead wood) that are more susceptible to high severity disturbances, such as stand- replacement wildfire, diseases, and insect attacks than what occurred before European settlement (Morgan et al. 1993). Before European influence, frequent low intensity fires burned most of the coarse woody debris (CWD) in complex mosaics in ponderosa pine forests and kept the severity of fires lower than after European settlement (Agee, 1993). Lithosol meadows provide habitat for the numerous geophytic plant species (Gleason, 2001). These meadows are distributed throughout the watershed, but are most abundant on the plateau above the canyon and north of Copco and Iron Gate reservoirs. Noxious weeds were introduced into the western United States mostly from Eurasia and were not present in the Klamath River study area before European settlement in the late 1800s (BLM, 1996). The early homesteaders who moved into the Klamath River cleared the river terraces for cultivation of crops, such as alfalfa and timothy, and ranching purposes (Gleason, 2001). Beginning in the 1940s, non-native plant species were introduced for grazing, forestry, transmission line rights-of-way (ROW), and road cuts. Some areas were seeded with non-native grasses, such as bulbous bluegrass (Poa bulbosa) and Pleum pratense, that out-competed native species, while in other areas non-native species spread through natural propagation. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) now dominate areas that receive heavy grazing pressure. Yellow starthistle was introduced into California by beekeepers and has infested many thousands of acres in the western United States. Even though noxious weeds have come to dominate many areas in the Klamath Canyon (the area between Copco reservoir and J.C. Boyle dam), there are many refugia for native plant communities (Gleason, 2001). © February 2004 PacifiCorp Exhibit E Page 5-2 Exhibit E Wildlife and Botanical Resources.DOC PacifiCorp Klamath Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2082 Figure E5.1-1 Terrestrial resources study area 11 x 17 front © February 2004 PacifiCorp Exhibit E Wildlife and Botanical Resources.DOC Exhibit E Page 5-3 PacifiCorp Klamath Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2082 Back of Figure © February 2004 PacifiCorp Exhibit E Page 5-4 Exhibit E Wildlife and Botanical Resources.DOC PacifiCorp Klamath Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2082 An assessment of pre-Project conditions conducted by PacifiCorp for purposes of developing an understanding of ecological factors influencing current conditions and for identifying opportunities for potential protection, mitigation, and enhancement (PM&E) measures found that, as is the case with most semi-arid rivers, historically riparian habitat was dominated by a mixture of shrub and tree species, and was restricted primarily to narrow bands along the Klamath River before Project construction (see Terrestrial Resources Final Terrestrial Report [FTR], Section 3.7). The average riparian vegetation width along the Klamath River was 23 feet (7 m), 101 feet (31 m), and 27 feet (8 m) at sections of river now occupied by Iron Gate, Copco, and J.C. Boyle reservoirs, respectively. Only along sections of the river just upstream of the present-day Copco dam was the riparian vegetation wide. Historically, riparian and wetland vegetation bordered 28 percent (J.C. Boyle reservoir), 49 percent (Copco reservoir), and 68 percent (Iron Gate reservoir) of the river and major tributary shoreline under historical conditions. Review of historical aerial photos for river reaches downstream of the dams indicates that riparian vegetation historically was quite narrow, especially in what is now the Copco No. 2 bypass. In the Keno Canyon and J.C. Boyle bypass and peaking reaches, there have been relatively minor shifts in the overall distribution and extent of riparian vegetation relative to historical conditions, although non-native plant species were likely less common in the riparian zone before European settlement and subsequent development. Substantial changes in riparian conditions have occurred in the Link River. Before Project development, much of the riparian zone was devoid of native trees and included several orchards and human settlements. E5.1.2 Wildlife Resources The Klamath River Canyon is a natural wildlife migration corridor through the Cascade Mountains. The diverse terrain and plant communities support a large number of wildlife species. The various species have been affected by direct harvest and habitat manipulation during the thousands of years of human habitation in the area. Before European settlement, Native American tribes hunted year-round for deer (Odocoileus hemionus), elk (Cervus elaphus), antelope (Antilocopra americana), bighorn sheep (Cervus canadensis), black
Recommended publications
  • Plant List Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail
    *Non-native Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail Plant List as of 7/12/2016 compiled by Tanya Harvey T24S.R3E.S33;T25S.R3E.S4 westerncascades.com FERNS & ALLIES Pseudotsuga menziesii Ribes lacustre Athyriaceae Tsuga heterophylla Ribes sanguineum Athyrium filix-femina Tsuga mertensiana Ribes viscosissimum Cystopteridaceae Taxaceae Rhamnaceae Cystopteris fragilis Taxus brevifolia Ceanothus velutinus Dennstaedtiaceae TREES & SHRUBS: DICOTS Rosaceae Pteridium aquilinum Adoxaceae Amelanchier alnifolia Dryopteridaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea Holodiscus discolor Polystichum imbricans (Sambucus mexicana, S. cerulea) Prunus emarginata (Polystichum munitum var. imbricans) Sambucus racemosa Rosa gymnocarpa Polystichum lonchitis Berberidaceae Rubus lasiococcus Polystichum munitum Berberis aquifolium (Mahonia aquifolium) Rubus leucodermis Equisetaceae Berberis nervosa Rubus nivalis Equisetum arvense (Mahonia nervosa) Rubus parviflorus Ophioglossaceae Betulaceae Botrychium simplex Rubus ursinus Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Sceptridium multifidum (Alnus sinuata) Sorbus scopulina (Botrychium multifidum) Caprifoliaceae Spiraea douglasii Polypodiaceae Lonicera ciliosa Salicaceae Polypodium hesperium Lonicera conjugialis Populus tremuloides Pteridaceae Symphoricarpos albus Salix geyeriana Aspidotis densa Symphoricarpos mollis Salix scouleriana Cheilanthes gracillima (Symphoricarpos hesperius) Salix sitchensis Cryptogramma acrostichoides Celastraceae Salix sp. (Cryptogramma crispa) Paxistima myrsinites Sapindaceae Selaginellaceae (Pachystima myrsinites)
    [Show full text]
  • Calochortus Flexuosus S. Watson (Winding Mariposa Lily): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Calochortus flexuosus S. Watson (winding mariposa lily): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project July 24, 2006 Susan Spackman Panjabi and David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Panjabi, S.S. and D.G. Anderson. (2006, July 24). Calochortus flexuosus S. Watson (winding mariposa lily): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/calochortusflexuosus.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Leslie Stewart, Peggy Fiedler, Marilyn Colyer, Peggy Lyon, Lynn Moore, and William Jennings. Their interest in the project and time spent answering questions were extremely valuable, and their insights into the distribution, habitat, and ecology of Calochortus flexuosus were crucial to this project. Thanks also to Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, and Joy Bartlett for assisting with questions and project management. Thanks to Kimberly Nguyen for her work on the layout and for bringing this assessment to Web publication. Jane Nusbaum and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Peggy Lyon and Marilyn Colyer provided valuable insights based on their experiences with C. flexuosus. Leslie Stewart provided information specific to the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management, including the Canyons of the Ancients National Monument. Annette Miller provided information on C. flexuosusseed storage status. Drs. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson provided access to specimens of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Aitken Basin
    Geological and geochemical analysis of units in the South Pole – Aitken Basin A.M. Borst¹,², F.S. Bexkens¹,², B. H. Foing², D. Koschny² ¹ Department of Petrology, VU University Amsterdam ² SCI-S. Research and Scientific Support Department, ESA – ESTEC Student Planetary Workshop 10-10-2008 ESA/ESTEC The Netherlands The South Pole – Aitken Basin Largest and oldest Lunar impact basin - Diameter > 2500 km - Depth > 12 km - Age 4.2 - 3.9 Ga Formed during Late heavy bombardment? Window into the interior and evolution of the Moon Priority target for future sample return missions Digital Elevation Model from Clementine altimetry data. Produced in ENVI, 50x vertical exaggeration, orthographic projection centered on the far side. Red +10 km, purple/black -10km. (A.M.Borst et.al. 2008) 1 The Moon and the SPA Basin Geochemistry Iron map South Pole – Aitken Basin mafic anomaly • High Fe, Th, Ti and Mg abundances • Excavation of mafic deep crustal / upper mantle material Thorium map Clementine 750 nm albedo map from USGS From Paul Lucey, J. Geophys. Res., 2000 Map-a-Planet What can we learn from the SPA Basin? • Large impacts; Implications and processes • Volcanism; Origin, age and difference with near side mare basalts • Cratering record; Age, frequency and size distribution • Late Heavy Bombardment; Intensity, duration and origin • Composition of the deeper crust and possibly upper mantle 2 Topics of SPA Basin study 1) Global structure of the basin (F.S. Bexkens et al, 2008) • Rims, rings, ejecta distribution, subsequent craters modifications, reconstructive
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Native Plant Journal a Bi-Monthly Web Magazine (Formerly NW Native Plant Newsletter)
    Volume 4, Issue 2, 2006 April 2006 NorthwestNorthwest NativeNative PlantPlant JournalJournal A Bi-Monthly Web Magazine (formerly NW Native Plant Newsletter) Reminder: April 22 is Earth Day! Unusual! Strange! Intriguing! A new way to look at NW Native Plants When is a native more than a native? Fresh new photos! The WildPublished Garden: Hansen’s by Northwest The NativeWild Plant Garden: Database Hansen’s Northwest Native Plant PageDatabase 1 Northwest Native Plant Journal A Bi-Monthly Web Magazine (formerly NW Native Plant Newsletter) Contents Departments Shaping nature About this Journal............................3 Native plants never dreamed On the Cover....................................4 they’d look like this!...........................9 Rare Plant Puzzle Wondrous works Name this plant!..................5 Photos by Don Eastman.................21 Garden chores to do now................6 Living fences Sparky’s Corner................................7 No paint needed!.............................27 Wally’s personal notes..................36 Native Plant Resources Information on the Web.................33 Jennifer Rehm, Editor, author, webmaster for The Wild Garden: Hansen’s Northwest Native Plant Database website: www.nwplants.com e-Mail: [email protected] All rights reserved. This entire publication Copyright © 2012 The Wild Garden: Hansen’s Northwest Native Plant Database. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means--graphic, electronic, or mechanical--without the written permission of Jennifer Rehm,The Wild Garden, except for reviewers who may quote brief passages. Any request for photocopying, recording, taping or information storage and retrieval systems of any part of this publication shall be directed in writing to the publisher: Jennifer Rehm, The Wild Garden: Hansen’s Northwest Native Plant Database.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Vii Table of Contents
    CHAPTER VII TABLE OF CONTENTS VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED........................................................................1 Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases......................................................................1 Appendix 2: Suggested Stocking Levels......................................................................................8 Appendix 3: Known Plants of the Desolation Watershed.........................................................15 Literature Cited............................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER VII - APPENDICES & REFERENCES - DESOLATION ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS i VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases Vegetation data for the Desolation ecosystem analysis was stored in three different databases. This document serves as a data dictionary for the existing vegetation, historical vegetation, and potential natural vegetation databases, as described below: • Interpretation of aerial photography acquired in 1995, 1996, and 1997 was used to characterize existing (current) conditions. The 1996 and 1997 photography was obtained after cessation of the Bull and Summit wildfires in order to characterize post-fire conditions. The database name is: 97veg. • Interpretation of late-1930s and early-1940s photography was used to characterize historical conditions. The database name is: 39veg. • The potential natural vegetation was determined for each polygon in the analysis
    [Show full text]
  • KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon
    KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Kalmiopsis leachiana ISSN 1055-419X Volume 20, 2013 &ôùĄÿĂùñü KALMIOPSIS (irteen years, fourteen issues; that is the measure of how long Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, ©2013 I’ve been editing Kalmiopsis. (is is longer than I’ve lived in any given house or worked for any employer. I attribute this longevity to the lack of deadlines and time clocks and the almost total freedom to create a journal that is a showcase for our state and society. (ose fourteen issues contained 60 articles, 50 book reviews, and 25 tributes to Fellows, for a total of 536 pages. I estimate about 350,000 words, an accumulation that records the stories of Oregon’s botanists, native )ora, and plant communities. No one knows how many hours, but who counts the hours for time spent doing what one enjoys? All in all, this editing gig has been quite an education for me. I can’t think of a more e*ective and enjoyable way to make new friends and learn about Oregon plants and related natural history than to edit the journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon. Now it is time for me to move on, but +rst I o*er thanks to those before me who started the journal and those who worked with me: the FEJUPSJBMCPBSENFNCFST UIFBVUIPSTXIPTIBSFEUIFJSFYQFSUJTF UIFSFWJFXFST BOEUIF4UBUF#PBSETXIPTVQQPSUFENZXPSL* especially thank those who will follow me to keep this journal &ôùĄÿĂ$JOEZ3PDIÏ 1I% in print, to whom I also o*er my +les of pending manuscripts, UIFTFSWJDFTPGBOFYQFSJFODFEQBHFTFUUFS BSFMJBCMFQSJOUFSBOE &ôùĄÿĂùñü#ÿñĂô mailing service, and the opportunity of a lifetime: editing our +ne journal, Kalmiopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflowers Near Boise Cascade (Wenas) Campground (In the Upper
    Wildflowers Near Boise Cascade (Wenas) Campground (in the upper Wenas Valley) Boise Cascade Lands Yakima County, WA from a trip held May 24, 2019 T16N R16E S3; T17N R16E S34, S35 Updated: December 13, 2019 Common Name Scientific Name Family Ferns and Horsetails ____ Fragile Fern Cystopteris fragilis Cystopteridaceae Monocots - Sedges, Rushes, Grasses & Herbaceous Wildflowers ____ Tapertip Onion Allium accuminatum Amaryllidaceae ____ Common Camas Camassia quamash (ssp. maxima ?) Asparagaceae ____ Douglas' Brodiaea Triteleia grandiflora v. grandiflora Asparagaceae ____ Elk Sedge Carex geyeri Cyperaceae ____ Grass Widows Olsynium douglasii v. douglasii Iridaceae ____ Sagebrush Mariposa Calochortus macrocarpus ssp. macrocarpus Liliaceae ____ Yellow Bells Fritillaria pudica Liliaceae ____ Panicled Deathcamas Toxicoscordion paniculatum Melanthiaceae ____ Meadow Deathcamas Toxicosordion venenosum Melanthiaceae ____ Common Western Needlegrass Achnatherum (occidentale ssp. pubescens ?) Poaceae ____ Field Meadow Foxtail Alopecurus pratensis Poaceae ____ Smooth Brome Bromus inermis Poaceae ____ Cheatgrass Bromus tectorum Poaceae ____ Onepike Oatgrass Danthonia unispicata Poaceae ____ Bottlebrush Squirreltail Elymus elymoides Poaceae ____ Bulbous Bluegrass Poa bulbosa Poaceae ____ Bluebunch Wheatgrass Pseudoroegenaria spicata v. spicata Poaceae Trees and Shrubs ____ Blue Elderberry Sambucus cerulea Adoxaceae ____ Stiff Sagebrush Artemisia rigida Asteraceae ____ Gray Rabbitbrush Ericameria nauseosa v. speciosa Asteraceae ____ Shining Oregon Grape Berberis aquifolium Berberidaceae ____ Mountain Alder Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia Betulaceae ____ Common Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus v. laevigatus Caprifoliaceae ____ Kinnikinnik Arctostaphylos nevadensis ssp. nevadensis Ericaceae ____ Wax Currant Ribes cereum v. cereum Grossulariaceae ____ Fir Abies amabilis or A. grandis Pinaceae ____ Ponderosa Pine Pinus ponderosa v. ponderosa Pinaceae ____ Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii v. menziesii Pinaceae ____ Snowbrush Ceanothus velutinus v.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Erosion Control
    NATIVES FOR EROSION CONTROL Source: BOSKY DELL NATIVE NURSERY www.boskydellnatives.com (modified to include only lower Willamette Valley Natives) PLANTS FOR DRY, SUNNY AREAS TREES Plant Species Cultural Requirements Root Depth Abies grandis , grand fir dry to moist soil, full to partial sun deep roots Acer macrophyllum , big-leaf maple dry to wet soil, full sun deep roots Arbutus menziesii , Pacific madrone dry soil, full sun deep roots Cornus nuttallii, Pacific dogwood dry to moist soil, full to part sun deep roots Pinus ponderosa, western ponderosa pine dry soil, full sun deep roots Populus tremuloides, quaking aspen dry to moist soil, full sun deep roots Prunus virginiana, chokecherry dry soil, full sun deep roots Pseudotsuga menziesii , Douglas fir dry to moist soil, full sun deep roots Quercus garryana, Oregon white oak dry to moist soil, full sun deep roots Sambucus cerulea , blue elderberry dry to moist soil deep roots Thuja plicata , western red cedar dry to wet soil, full sun deep roots SHRUBS Plant Species Cultural Requirements Root Depth Amelanchior alnifolia, serviceberry dry to moist soil, full sun medium depth Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, kinnikinnik dry soil, full sun medium depth Holodiscus discolor, oceanspray dry to moist soil, full sun to full shade deep roots Mahonia aquifolium, tall Oregon grape dry to moist soil, full sun to full shade medium depth Mahonia repens , creeping Oregon grape dry to moist soil, full sun to full shade medium depth Philadelphus lewisii , mock orange dry to moist soil, full sun medium depth Ribes aureum, golden currant dry to moist soil, full sun medium depth Ribes sanguineum , red flowering currant dry to moist soil, full sun to part shade medium depth Rosa gymnocarpa, baldhip rose dry to moist soil, full sun to part shade medium depth Rosa nootkana, nootka rose dry to wet soil, full sun medium depth Rosa pisocarpa, clustered rose dry to moist soil, full sun medium depth Spiraea betulifolia var.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Subfamilial Classification of the Grasses (Poaceae) Author(S): Grass Phylogeny Working Group, Nigel P
    Phylogeny and Subfamilial Classification of the Grasses (Poaceae) Author(s): Grass Phylogeny Working Group, Nigel P. Barker, Lynn G. Clark, Jerrold I. Davis, Melvin R. Duvall, Gerald F. Guala, Catherine Hsiao, Elizabeth A. Kellogg, H. Peter Linder Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 88, No. 3 (Summer, 2001), pp. 373-457 Published by: Missouri Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3298585 Accessed: 06/10/2008 11:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mobot. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Patterns of Calochortus Greenii on the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument
    Habitat and Landscape Distribution of Calochortus greenei S. Watson (Liliaceae) Across the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, Southwest Oregon Evan Frost and Paul Hosten1 ABSTRACT The Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument includes a wide range of slope, elevation, soil types, and historic management activities. Calochortus greenei occupies a wide range of habitats primarily defined by topographic and edaphic factors. Several environmental factors are confounded with patterns of livestock use, making it difficult to separate the influence of individual factors. The inclusion of many environmental variables in multivariate models with little predictive power suggests that few generalizations about C. greenei abundance relative to environmental factors are valid across the larger landscape. Distance from vegetation edge was an important biotic variable incorporated in models of C. greenei population density across the landscape, suggesting that ecotones between soil types may play a role in defining suitable habitat. The varied localized influence of edaphic factors may indicate their indirect importance to C. greenei habitat by controlling the expression of mixed shrub and hardwood vegetation. Habitat analyses and examination of population size and change over time are similarly confounded by environmental and management factors. However, an examination within three areas of C. greenei aggregation with distinct soils and elevation indicate that the relative proportion of native perennial and non-native short-lived grasses are correlated with population size. These results suggest that invasive annual and short- lived perennial grasses may prevent the successful establishment and persistence of C. greenei seedlings, resulting in the long-term decline of populations in habitats and circumstances prone to invasion by ruderal species, including high livestock use areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Assessment the Ranch ±530- Acre Study Area City of Rancho Cordova, California
    Biological Resources Assessment The Ranch ±530- Acre Study Area City of Rancho Cordova, California Prepared for: K. Hovnanian Homes October 13, 2017 Prepared by: © 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Regulatory Framework ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1. Federal Regulations .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1. Federal Endangered Species Act ............................................................................... 2 2.1.2. Migratory Bird Treaty Act ......................................................................................... 2 2.1.3. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ............................................................... 2 2.2. State Jurisdiction .............................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1. California Endangered Species Act ........................................................................... 3 2.2.2. California Department of Fish and Game Codes ...................................................... 3 2.2.3. Native Plant Protection Act .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]