DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson © 2001 by Michael G. Simpson and Jon P. Rebman © 1996 by Michael G. Simpson, Scott C. McMillan, Brenda L. McMillan, Judy Gibson, and Jon P. Rebman. © 1995 by Michael G. Simpson, Scott C. McMillan, and Brenda L. Stone This material may not be reproduced or resold. for correspondence, write to: Dr. Jon P. Rebman, San Diego Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 121390, San Diego, CA 92112-1390 Email: [email protected] or to: Dr. Michael G. Simpson, Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4614 Email: [email protected] Cover photographs are plants endemic to San Diego County, California, all taken by the authors. iii table of contents preface v alphabetical listing of families xxi san Diego county vascular plant checklist: Documented with herbarium vouchers lycophytes 1 equisetophytes 1 ophioglossoid ferns 1 leptosporangiate ferns 1 seed plants 3 conifers 3 gnetales 4 angiosperms (flowering plants) 4 Magnoliids: laurales (calycanthaceae & lauraceae) 4 Magnoliids: piperales (saururaceae) 4 ceratophyllales (ceratophyllaceae) 4 eudicots 4 Monocots 81 appendix 1: taxa reported for san Diego county but excluded 97 appendix 2: taxa endemic to san Diego county 105 appendix 3: hybrid taxa in san Diego county 109 appendix 4: historical collections not Documented in last 50 years 111 appendix 5: recent collections lacking sD or sDsu vouchers 113 appendix 6: taxa with cnps inventory listings 115 index of genera and families 121 notes: (for personal use) 131 iv v preface Goals and Format This is the fifth edition of the Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County (here referred to as simply the Checklist), which catalogs all native and naturalized vascular plants known to occur in San Diego County, California, U.S.A., “naturalized” referring to non-native/exotic plants that grow, persist, and reproduce in natural, non-cultivated habitats. This edition supersedes the four previous editions of the Checklist (Simpson et al. 1995, 1996; Simpson and Rebman 2001, Rebman and Simpson 2006). The need for this revision of the Checklist arose with the publication of The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Ed. 2 (Baldwin et al. 2012, referred to hereafter as Jepson II, which replaced the earlier Hickman 1993 edition, Jepson I), resulting in numerous nomenclatural changes to the plants of California. In addition, a great number of taxa new to San Diego County have been discovered since our 2006 (fourth) edition, and some misidentifications have been corrected. Nomenclature for this Checklist is based on Jepson II for most native and naturalized plants, Hortus Third (Bailey & Bailey 1976) for some naturalized plants, or original research journal articles where pertinent (discussed below or cited in the Checklist). We have also utilized the Consortium of California Herbaria (CCH 2014), the Jepson eFlora (Jepson Flora Project 2014) and published volumes of the Flora of North America (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds. 1993+), the latter listed electronically at <http://www.efloras.org> and referred to here as FNA eFlora. As with the fourth edition, this fifth edition of the Checklist provides documentation of all taxa by the listing of an accession number from a representative herbarium specimen, known as the herbarium voucher. Almost all specimen citations are from the San Diego Natural History Museum (sD), which can be viewed as digital scans at the synoptic collection images link of the San Diego County Plant Atlas web site <http://www.sdplantatlas.org>. A few specimens are cited from the herbaria at University of California Davis (ahuc), California Academy of Sciences (cas, Ds), California Department of Food and Agriculture (cDa), Desert Botanical Garden (Des), Harvard University (gh), Humboldt State University (hsc), California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo (oBi), Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden (rsa, poM), San Diego State University (sDsu), San Jose State University (sJsu), University of California Berkeley (uc, Jeps), and University of California Riverside (ucr), and the Smithsonian Institution (us), and Utah State University (utc). Most specimen records were accessed from the Consortium of California Herbaria (CCH 2014). Appendix 1 lists taxa that have been reported to occur in San Diego County but which are excluded from our Checklist, either because these reports lack documentation or because we believe the identity or locality was incorrect. We feel that in preparing any floristic checklist, it is of the utmost importance that every taxon listed be documented with an herbarium specimen deposited and accessioned in an accredited herbarium. Without proper specimen documentation, the presence or correct identity of these taxa may be in doubt. Checklists of taxa without documentation are unverifiable and thus are out of the realm of science. We hope and encourage that future work on regional checklists and local floristic surveys, including those by governmental agencies and private consulting firms, will endeavor to provide complete specimen documentation. diversity Our current count of native and naturalized vascular plants documented to vi occur in San Diego County is 2,447 species (including common hybrids), and 2,672 total taxa (including subspecies and varieties). These totals are up from our 2,143 species and 2,314 total taxa of the fourth edition, mostly due to new discoveries in the interim. These species and taxa occur in a total of 879 genera in 163 families. Of these 2,447 species, 1,689 (69.0%) are native to the County and 758 (31.0%, up from 26.6% in our fourth edition) are non-native and naturalized in the County (the latter designated with a “*” symbol). Of the 2,672 total taxa, 1,901 (71.1%) are native and 771 (28.9%, up from 25.0% in our fourth edition) are non-native and naturalized. In summary, the documented County’s flora has increased by304 species (14.2%, 116 species native, 188 species non-native) and 358 total taxa (15.4%, 166 taxa native, 192 taxa non-native) since our 4th edition was published. These values illustrate the great number of native plants that have been discovered in the County in the last eight years. But, they also point out the great number of exotic plants that have become established in native habitats of the County (an increase in documentation of 7.4% of our total species and 6.9% of our total taxa since the publication of our 4th edition), with more being detected every year. This increase may be due in part to our accelerated effort to document plants of the County (see Plant Atlas Project, below). The increase may also represent recent introductions, often from cultivation but many “accidental” (Lehan et al. 2013). San Diego County is often cited as having more species (or taxa) of vascular plants than any other county in the United States. We have to date not verified this from counts of county floras (few are available), but we know of no other county in the U.S., including the counties of the Hawaiian islands, having more species or total taxa. Perhaps a more meaningful comparison between regions is the richness of native (versus non-native) plants. Thus, the 1,689 native vascular plant species or 1,901 native total taxa for San Diego County could be used in regional comparisons of natural biodiversity. This does not detract from the importance of tabulating non-native, naturalized plants, most of which have become a permanent part of our flora. native to CaliFornia, not to san dieGo County Of the taxa we list as non-native to San Diego County, 15 are native to the state of California, but are thought by us to have been established from other parts of the state to native habitats in San Diego County and are listed as non-native to the County. These taxa are: Baileya multiradiata Torr. Asteraceae Eriophyllum staechadifolium Lag. Asteraceae Eriogonum giganteum S. Watson var. formosum K. Brandegee Polygonaceae Eriogonum giganteum S. Watson var. giganteum Polygonaceae Galium tricornutum Dandy Rubiaceae Gilia tricolor Benth. Polemoniaceae Hesperevax caulescens (Benth.) A. Gray Asteraceae Leptosyne gigantea Kellogg Asteraceae Lipocarpha micrantha (Vahl) G.C. Tucker Cyperaceae Malva assurgentiflora (Kellogg) M.F.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newcomb 1981-12.Pdf
    POPULAR ANNUALS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA, 1865 - 1914 -.- I P -i 3Y Peggy Cornett Newcomb A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University f Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for he Longwood Program for the degree of Master of Sci,once in rnamental Horticulture. December, 1981 I. d Copyright Peggy Cornett Newcomb 1981 I wish to express sincere thanks to the Longwood Program for the opportunity to do this study. I am deeply indebted to those who served on my thesis committee and made substantial improvements upon my initial drafts. Dr. Richard W. Lighty helped me focus my ideas and raise my aspirations, Mr. Harold Bruce used his editorial talents to salvage many ragged sentences, and Ms. Julia F. Davis provided invaluable scholarly advice and much needed en- couragement. I acknowledge all the institutions which I visited during the past two years and spent many enjoyable hours exploring their rare book and catalogue collections. To Ms. Dolores Altemus and Mr. Stuart Dick, University of Delaware Library; Ms. Enola Teeter, Longwood Gardens Library; Ms. Mary Lou Wolf, Pennsylvania Horticultural Society Library; and Ms. Elisabeth Woodburn, Booknoll Farm I extend a special thanks for their generous assistance. Lastly, without the genuine assurances of my friends and my husband, Rob Newcomb, I would never have carried this thesis to its completion. For their constant companionship I am truly grateful. iii I, TABLE OF CONTENTS QCKNOWLEDGMENTS.. ................. iii OF CONTENTS .................. iV BSTRaCT ...................... vi PINTRODUCTION .................... 1 Chapter I. AN OVERVIEW OF THE AGE: SORE MAJOR INFLUENCES UPON THE DEVELOPNIENT OF HORTICULTURE AND TKE SEED INDUSTRY .....
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve
    FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve This project was supported by NACC NRM and the Shire of Morawa through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program Canna Reserve BioBlitz 2019 Weaving and wonder in the wilderness! The weather may have been hot and dry, but that didn’t stop everyone having fun and learning about the rich biodiversity and conservation value of the wonderful Canna Reserve during the highly successful 2019 BioBlitz. On the 14 - 15 September 2019, NACC NRM together with support from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions and the Shire of Morawa, hosted their third BioBlitz at the Canna Reserve in the Shire of Morawa. Fifty professional biologists and citizen scientists attended the event with people travelling from near and far including Morawa, Perenjori, Geraldton and Perth. After an introduction and Acknowledgement of Country from organisers Jessica Stingemore and Jarna Kendle, the BioBlitz kicked off with participants separating into four teams and heading out to explore Canna Reserve with the goal of identifying as many plants, birds, invertebrates, and vertebrates as possible in a 24 hr period. David Knowles of Spineless Wonders led the invertebrate survey with assistance from, OAM recipient Allen Sundholm, Jenny Borger of Jenny Borger Botanical Consultancy led the plant team, BirdLife Midwest member Alice Bishop guided the bird survey team and David Pongracz from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions ran the vertebrate surveys with assistance from volunteer Corin Desmond. The BioBlitz got off to a great start identifying 80 plant species during the first survey with many more species to come and even a new orchid find for the reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Abronia Umbellata Var. Breviflora)
    Pink sandverbena (Abronia umbellata var. breviflora) ENDANGERED Flowers (left), habit (center), and habitat (right) of pink sandverbena. Photos by ODA staff (left and center) and Thomas Kaye (right). If downloading images from this website, please credit the photographer. Family Nyctaginaceae Taxonomic notes Synonyms: Abronia umbellata ssp. breviflora, Abronia umbellata ssp. acutalata, Abronia umbellata var. acutalata, Abronia breviflora, Abronia acutalata The number of taxa included within the Abronia umbellata complex has varied with different treatments of the group. Based on genetic and morphometric studies of A. umbellata populations, we consider A. umbellata var. acutalata to be included within var. breviflora. Plant description Pink sandverbena can be either an annual or occasionally a short-lived perennial. It is a tap-rooted glandular-puberulent forb with few to several prostrate branches up to 1 m (-1.5) long. Leaf blades are fleshy, light green, oval to oblong-ovate with somewhat irregular margins, 2-6 cm long, with slender petioles about as long as the blades. Flowers are grouped in ball-like clusters of 8-20 (average 14-15) subtended by 5 (4) lanceolate involucral bracts, with clusters born at the ends of stalks growing out from the stems. Individual plants produce from one to thousands of flower clusters, depending on conditions. The perianth is glandular-puberulent, the perianth tube greenish or yellowish to pink and 0.6-0.8 cm long. The corolla limbs are pinkish-purple to deep reddish-magenta, 0.5-0.8 cm broad. Flowers have a yellowish-white eyespot 0.25-0.3 cm in diameter surrounding the throat.
    [Show full text]
  • Abronia Maritima Nutt. Ex S. Wats
    SPECIES Abronia maritima Nutt. ex S. Wats. Family: Nyctaginaceae; NRCS CODE: Gary A. Monroe @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database ABMA2 Order: Caryophyllales; Subclass: Caryophyllidae; Class: Magnoliopsida Subspecific taxa None. Synonyms None listed. Common name red sand verbena (CalFlora, USDA PLANTS), sticky sand verbena (CalFlora) Taxonomic relationships Abronia latifolia Eschsch. and A. umbellata Lam. are closely related species (Blancas 2001). Related taxa in region May co-occur with A. latifolia and A. umbellata where distributions overlap. All three occur between Point Arguello, Santa Barbara Co., to Morro Bay in San Luis Obispo Co. (Tilllett 1967). Other CNPS list 4.2, limited distribution. Endemic to California and Baja California. There has been concern that hybridization with the two more widespread, co-occurring species of Abronia together with rapid loss of its coastal dune habitat are making the plants vulnerable to extinction (Blancas 2001). Genetic and morphological studies by Blancas (2001) were consistent with there being a high rate of hybridization with A. umbellata within a few small populations. GENERAL Map Data provided by the participants of the Consortium of California Herbaria represent 114 records with coordinate data out of 324 total records retrieved; data accessed 9/23/10. See Berkeley Mapper: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/consortium Geographic range Sparsely located in central and southern California and Baja California (Hickman 1993). Distribution in California; South coast and south central coast (Hickman 1993) and Channel Islands. Ecological Sections Ecological section and subsection (http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/projects/ecoregions/ca_sections.htm): Central California Coast (261A), and Southern California Coast (261B). Life history, life form Perennial herb, rapidly growing, mat forming pioneer that keeps up with advancing sand dunes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Survey of the Flora of Remnants Within the Waddy
    1 A SURVEY OF THE FLORA OF REMNANTS WITHIN THE WADDY FOREST LAND CONSERVATION DISTRICT Stephen Davies and Phil Ladd for the Waddy Forest Land Conservation District Committee March 2000 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 METHODS 3 RESULTS 4 DISCUSSION 56 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 59 REFERENCES 60 Appendix 1 - Composite plant list 60 Appendix 2 - Plants found outside the sample sites 67 Appendix 3 - Composite bird list 67 3 INTRODUCTION The Waddy Forest Land Conservation District is about 41,000 hectares and contains 23 substantial land holdings. In 1999 the District received a grant from the National Heritage Trust to survey the flora of its remnant vegetation. Much of this is on private property and the District Committee selected thirty three plots of remnant bushland on private farms to be included in flora survey. The present report is based on visits to these thirty three remnants that lie on 14 of the 23 farms in the district. The surveys are intended to provide information about the biodiversity of the various remnants with the aim of establishing the priority for preservation, by fencing, of the remnants and to determine the value of linking some of them by the planting of corridors of vegetation. At each site the local landholder(s) joined the survey and provided invaluable background information about the history of the remnants. The vegetation of this part of the northern wheatbelt is known to be very diverse. The Marchagee Nature Reserve, lying north west of the District, was surveyed between 1975 and 1977 (Dell et al. 1979). The area was covered by Beard in his vegetation mapping project (Beard 1976), and part of the south of the District was covered in a report on Koobabbie Farm in 1990 (Davies 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Pala Park Habitat Assessment
    Pala Park Bank Stabilization Project: Geotechnical Exploration TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ATTACHMENTS Biological Report Summary Report (Attachment E-3) Level of Significance Checklist (Attachment E-4) Biological Resources Map (Attachment E-5) Site Photographs (Attachment E-6) SECTION 2.0 HABITAT ASSESSMENT General Site Information ............................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 4 Special Status Resources ............................................................................................................. 8 Other Issues ................................................................................................................................ 14 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 14 References .................................................................................................................................. 16 LIST OF TABLES Page 1 Special Status Plant Species Known to Occur in the Vicinity of the Survey Area ........... 10 2 Chaparral Sand-Verbena Populations Observed in the Survey Area ............................. 12 3 Paniculate Tarplant
    [Show full text]
  • GDV Field Assessment.Pdf
    Miralga Groundwater Dependent Vegetation Assessment Atlas Iron Pty Ltd December 2019 Page 2 of 24 Introduction and Background Atlas Iron Pty Ltd (Atlas Iron) are currently exploring the feasibility of the Miralga Project and require the use and reactivation of several existing groundwater bores, ALB0006, ALB0009, ALB0066, ALB0067, ALB0010, ALB0008, ALB0038, ALB0039 and ALB0041, to continue proposed on-ground works at Miralga (Figure 1). Prior to abstracting groundwater, Atlas Iron have requested an assessment of Groundwater Dependent Vegetation within a stretch of Shaw River, Six Mile Creek, Sulphur Springs Creek and an unnamed creek, totalling approximately 30 kilometres (km) of riparian vegetation. The purpose of the assessment is to determine the true extent of GDVs, provide fine-scale mapping of GDV units and search for phreatophytic flora species that may be adversely impacted by groundwater abstraction. The key species for this assessment is Melaleuca argentea which is known to access groundwater at or close to the surface. Objective and Scope of Work The overarching objective of the Project was to refine the GDV mapping to fine-scale map the functional vegetation units in the identified areas (Figure 1). This objective was met via the following: • A desktop assessment to further understand vegetation unit VT05 and the key phreatophytic species previously documented as occurring within the vegetation unit. • A site visit to map the functional units along the Study Area. We investigated VT05 within the drawdown contour of 0.5 m and a further 1 km north and south along Shaw River and Sulphur Springs Creek. The only exceptions to this were: - The area that contains bore ALB0008.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Mapping Vegetation Over Broad Spatial Extents: a Technique to Aid Land Management Across Jurisdictional Boundaries
    Landscape and Urban Planning 97 (2010) 296–305 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Landscape and Urban Planning journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/landurbplan A framework for mapping vegetation over broad spatial extents: A technique to aid land management across jurisdictional boundaries Angie Haslem a,b,∗, Kate E. Callister a, Sarah C. Avitabile a, Peter A. Griffioen c, Luke T. Kelly b, Dale G. Nimmo b, Lisa M. Spence-Bailey a, Rick S. Taylor a, Simon J. Watson b, Lauren Brown a, Andrew F. Bennett b, Michael F. Clarke a a Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia b School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia c Peter Griffioen Consulting, Ivanhoe, Victoria 3079, Australia article info abstract Article history: Mismatches in boundaries between natural ecosystems and land governance units often complicate an Received 2 October 2009 ecosystem approach to management and conservation. For example, information used to guide man- Received in revised form 25 June 2010 agement, such as vegetation maps, may not be available or consistent across entire ecosystems. This Accepted 5 July 2010 study was undertaken within a single biogeographic region (the Murray Mallee) spanning three Aus- Available online 7 August 2010 tralian states. Existing vegetation maps could not be used as vegetation classifications differed between states. Our aim was to describe and map ‘tree mallee’ vegetation consistently across a 104 000 km2 area Keywords: of this region. Hierarchical cluster analyses, incorporating floristic data from 713 sites, were employed Semi-arid ecosystems Mallee vegetation to identify distinct vegetation types. Neural network classification models were used to map these veg- Remote sensing etation types across the region, with additional data from 634 validation sites providing a measure of Neural network classification models map accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Palatability of Plants to Camels (DBIRD NT)
    Technote No. 116 June 2003 Agdex No: 468/62 ISSN No: 0158-2755 The Palatability of Central Australian Plant Species to Camels Dr B. Dorges, Dr J. Heucke, Central Australian Camel Industry Association and R. Dance, Pastoral Division, Alice Springs BACKGROUND About 600,000 camels (Camelus dromedarius) are believed to inhabit the arid centre of Australia, mainly in South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Most of these camels are feral. A small camel industry has developed, which harvests selected animals for domestic and export markets, primarily for meat. Camels can eat more than 80% of the common plant species found in Central Australia. Some plant species are actively sought by camels and may need to be protected. METHOD Observations of grazing preferences by camels were made periodically for up to 12 years on five cattle stations in Central Australia. Where camels were accustomed to the presence of humans, it was possible to observe their grazing preferences from a few metres. Radio transmitters were fitted on some camels for easy detection and observation at any time. These evaluations were used to establish a diet preference or palatability index for observed food plants. Table 1. Palatability index for camels Index Interpretation 1 only eaten when nothing else is available 2 rarely eaten 3 common food plant 4 main food plant at times 5 preferred food plant 6 highly preferred food plant 7 could be killed by camel browsing More information can be obtained from the web site of the Central Australian Camel Industry Association http://www.camelsaust.com.au 2 RESULTS Table 2.
    [Show full text]