Klaipeda University Lithuanian Institute of History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Klaipeda University Lithuanian Institute of History KLAIPEDA UNIVERSITY LITHUANIAN INSTITUTE OF HISTORY Paulius BUGYS ARMOUR IN THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 13 TH – 1ST HALF OF THE 16 TH CENTURY (ON THE BASIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA) Summary of doctoral dissertation Humanities, History (05 H) Vilnius 2014 Doctoral dissertation was prepared at Klaipeda University in 2009- 2013 Scientific supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gintautas ZABIELA (Klaipeda University, humanities, history – 05 H) The defence of dissertation takes place at the Council of Historical Studies of Klaipeda University and the Lithuanian Institute of History Chairman: Prof. Dr. Albinas KUNCEVI ČIUS (Vilnius University, humanities, history – 05 H) Members: Dr. Ernestas VASILIAUSKAS (Klaipeda University, humanities, history – 05 H) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mindaugas BERTAŠIUS (Kaunas University of Technology, humanities, history – 05 H) Dr. Vykintas VAITKEVI ČIUS (Klaipeda University, humanities, history – 05 H) Prof. Dr. Rimvydas PETRAUSKAS (Vilnius University, humanities, history – 05 H) Opponents: Prof. Dr. Valdas RAKUTIS (The General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, humanities, history – 05) Dr. Gintautas RACKEVI ČIUS (UAB „Kult ūros vertybi ų paieška, humanities, history – 05 H) The defence of dissertation will be held at the public session of the Council of Historical Studies at 13 p.m. on November 7, 2014, in the Aula Hall (Block 6) of the University of Klaipeda. Address: Herkaus Manto Street 84, 92294, Klaip ėda, Lithuania. The Summary of doctoral dissertation is sent out on October , 2014. The dissertation is publicly available at the libraries of the University of Klaipeda and the Lithuanian Institute of History KLAIP ĖDOS UNIVERSITETAS LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS INSTITUTAS Paulius BUGYS ŠARVUOT Ė LIETUVOS DIDŽIOJOJE KUNIGAIKŠTYST ĖJE XIII A. ANTROJE PUS ĖJE-XVI A. VIDURYJE (ARCHEOLOGIJOS DUOMENIMIS) Daktaro disertacijos santrauka Humanitariniai mokslai, istorija (05 H) Vilnius 2014 Disertacija rengta 2009-2013 metais Klaip ėdos Universitete Mokslinis vadovas: doc. dr. Gintautas ZABIELA (Klaip ėdos Universitetas, humanitariniai mokslai, istorija – 05 H) Disertacija ginama Klaip ėdos universiteto Istorijos mokslo krypties taryboje: Pirmininkas: prof. dr. Albinas KUNCEVI ČIUS (Vilniaus universitetas, humanitariniai mokslai, istorija – 05 H) Nariai: dr. Ernestas VASILIAUSKAS (Klaip ėdos universitetas, humanitariniai mokslai, istorija – 05 H) doc. dr. Mindaugas BERTAŠIUS (Kauno technologijos universitetas, humanitariniai mokslai, istorija – 05 H) dr. Vykintas VAITKEVI ČIUS (Klaip ėdos Universitetas, humanitariniai mokslai, istorija – 05 H) prof. Dr. Rimvydas PETRAUSKAS (Vilniaus Universitetas, humanitariniai mokslai – 05 H) Oponentai: prof. dr. Valdas RAKUTIS (Generolo Jono Žemai čio Lietuvos karo akademija, humanitariniai mokslai, istorija – 05 H) dr. Gintautas RACKEVI ČIUS (UAB „Kult ūros vertybi ų paieška“, humanitariniai mokslai, istorija – 05 H) Disertacija bus ginama viešame Istorijos mokslo krypties tarybos pos ėdyje 2014 m. lapkri čio 7 d. 13 val. Klaip ėdos universiteto Auloje (VI korpusas). Adresas: Herkaus Manto g. 84, 92294 Klaip ėda, Lietuva. Disertacijos santrauka išsiuntin ėta 2014 m. spalio d. Disertacij ą galima perži ūrėti Klaip ėdos universiteto ir Lietuvos istorijos instituto bibliotekose. ENGLISH SUMMARY OF DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Introduction Wars and conflicts have played a key role in the history of the world and individual nations throughout the ages. From the outset of its history, mankind incessantly got involved in various conflicts which of- ten would evolve into wars entailing heavy casualties. Winning conflicts, major or smaller, required not only certain warfare skills but also increas- ingly elaborate weapons and protective means against them. Armour developed alongside with the changes and advances in warfare tactics and weaponry. The developments of military strategy, tactics, weaponry and armour are, in particular, closely interconnected. With emergence of the schools of research of weapons and armour at the end of the 19 th cen- tury in Western Europe, military history has been increasingly aug- mented with the sources reflecting material culture of warfare. A com- prehensive analysis of weapons and armour has facilitated solving nu- merous questions of both warfare and general history which, up to date, have remained without answer. The mid-13 th century represents a significant time in the history of Lithuania. At that period, a single ruler consolidates his power; the state is established and subsequently recognized in Europe by his efforts. Furthermore, Lithuania becomes a kingdom with a full-fledged king, Mindaugas. The origins of the statehood were undoubtedly related to the emergence of military power of a single ruler and the formation of pro- fessional troops. Regretfully, the Kingdom of Lithuania had a very short- lived existence. With the assassination of Mindaugas a brief period of expansion of a new official state religion in Lithuania came to an end. Christianity did not take deeper roots neither among commoners nor even among the ruling elite during a short period. Archaeological evi- dence does not show any changes neither in burial grounds nor in cul- tural layers of settlements. Survival of the pagan funeral rites in the me- dieval state has a tremendous advantage for archaeology which helps to better reveal patterns of material culture and social stratification of the 1 population. A rapid abandonment of the old customs is not typical for the new Christian communities, which had been converted by efforts of the state. Thus, even after 1387, the practice of cremation of the dead being in decline, the deceased would be buried with rich grave goods for a rather long time yet. Such situation bodes well to expect location of graves that belonged to military community which might contain parts and fragments of armour. Unfortunately, the practice of cremation of the dead diminishes such probability. Turning back to the specifics of the period, it must be noted that from ca. the mid-13 th century the chain mail, prevalent up to that point in time, was being successively replaced (or supplemented) by the coat of plates. Therefore the probability of locating archeologically the coat of plates is enhanced from around the mid-13 th century. Relevance of the work : The state of Lithuania successfully enter- ing the third decade of its independence regained, there is a natural interest among general public in the past of its country which is inconceivable without the centuries-long struggles and wars. The emergence of the Lithuanian state is closely linked to the onset of a large military threat as well as the rise of its own military aristocracy, military expeditions and marauding inroads into the adjacent lands. It is impossible to envisage the whole ensuing history of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania without incessant fighting with hostile neighbours or expansionist campaigns of the rulers which were, as often as not, attended by larger or smaller battles. When exploring the warfare history of the medieval Lithuania, a rather dim im- age of a Lithuanian warrior often comes to mind. From sufficiently ample and detailed accounts of the Lithuanian historians one may form a perfect picture of what kind of enemy he had to face and the long-distance expedi- tions he had to endure. Amid intensive fighting with crusaders in the west- ern part of the country and, at the same time, pursuing eastward expan- sion, the rulers of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and, in particular, their fighters had to cope with a paramount task. Keeping in mind the fact that on the western border military expeditions and incursions to Lithuania were usually prepared by some of the best European warriors, and in the East there was an enemy using a totally different combat tactics, which had been tested in successful battles, the image of a warrior of the Grand 2 Duchy of Lithuania poses a great deal of questions. Therefore, leaving the research of the patterns of military strategy and tactics to military histori- ans, it is infinitely interesting to have a look at some items of material culture that show the quality and daily life of soldiers and, specifically, at the armour, one of the elements of military equipment. With the passage of time, the medieval warfare of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania is becom- ing more than an object of research involving historians and archaeolo- gists only. Soldiers of the Guard of Honour Company of the Lithuanian Army proudly don the medieval weapons and armour. The today armed forces of Lithuania, being descendants and successors to the military tradi- tions of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, demonstrate the garments and arms, reminiscent of the pinnacle of Lithuanian might (the late 14 th cen- tury), to foreign visitors and the Lithuanian public. These trends induce searches for ever more archaeological finds and related scientific records reflecting the armour of the army of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. A great deal of armour artefacts have been collected over the last 25 years owing to the Lithuanian archaeologists. The larger part of the data has been acquired while intensively excavating the territory of the Lower Castle in Vilnius, and finds at the new archaeological sites had a lot of surprises in store. One may not discard the probability that a part of unidentified elements of the armour lies in the repositories of Lithuanian museums amidst a wealth of archaeological materials, which ought to be examined additionally. The available archaeological
Recommended publications
  • Universidade Federal De Santa Catarina Centro De Filosofia E Ciências Humanas Departamento De História Disciplina: Trabalho De Conclusão De Curso
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA CENTRO DE FILOSOFIA E CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS DEPARTAMENTO DE HISTÓRIA DISCIPLINA: TRABALHO DE CONCLUSÃO DE CURSO ANDERSON TSUKIYAMA A CONSTRUÇÃO DO IDEAL DA CAVALARIA INGLESA NOS SÉCULOS XIII E XV ATRAVÉS DAS ARTES MARCIAIS FLORIANÓPOLIS 2015 2 ANDERSON TSUKIYAMA A CONSTRUÇÃO DO IDEAL DA CAVALARIA INGLESA NOS SÉCULOS XIII E XV ATRAVÉS DAS ARTES MARCIAIS Trabalho de conclusão de curso referente ao curso de graduação em História da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Orientadora: Profª Dra. Aline Dias da Silveira FLORIANÓPOLIS 2015 3 4 DEDICATÓRIA Aos membros do SCAM e amigos, sem os quais eu não teria conseguido progredir nesta pesquisa. 5 AGRADECIMENTOS Gostaria de agradecer primeiramente a minha orientadora, professora Aline Dias da Silveira, essencial para que eu pudesse executar este trabalho, pelas palavras diretas e necessárias, além de toda a dedicação e paciência, para me preparar para os desafios que ainda estão por vir. Aos amigos que encontrei durante a graduação, como Leonardo Remor, Andreas, Isabela, João e Stephanie. A Samanta por ter tido paciência em me ajudar com as normas técnicas, além de outros que resultariam em muitos agradecimentos neste pequeno espaço. À minha família fica meu maior agradecimento, por apoiar incondicionalmente alguém que optou por mudar a sua área de atuação, compreendendo que foi uma escolha feita por uma grande afinidade com a história. Mesmo com as dificuldades que tive pelo caminho, meus pais, Jorge Issao Tsukiyama e Adélia Tsukiyama estiveram sempre ao meu lado, assim como minha irmã Joselayne e meu cunhado César. Gostaria de agradecer ao enorme amor de minha namorada, Aline Martins Machado, meu porto seguro, por ter tido a grande paciência em compreender as minhas dificuldades, inclusive lendo meu texto e me passando as correções necessárias.
    [Show full text]
  • Lietuvos Respublikos Aukščiausiosios Tarybos Sesijoje Europos Bendrija
    IŠEIVIJOS LIETUVIŲ DIENRAŠTIS 4545 VVEST 63rd STREET • CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60629 TELEFONAS (312) 585-9500 TELEFAKSAS (312) 585-8284 TU LITULJ/VIVJI/VrM \A/OF*LO-WIO& DAILY Vol. LXXXIII Kaina 35 c. KETIVRTADIENIS - THURSDAY, GEGUŽĖ - MAY 14, 1992 Nr. 94 Lietuvos Respublikos . Europos Bendrija atšaukė Aukščiausiosios Tarybos ambasadorius sesijoje Amerika pasekė Europos pavyzdžiu Belgradas. Gegužės 12. — Atšaukė ambasadorių Trečiadienio žinios iš Lietuvos Dvylika Europos valstybių at­ Washingtone taip pat Busho šaukė savo ambasadorius iš administracija paskelbė, jog Vilnius. Gegužės 13 d. (Elta) liu daugiau ekonominių nusi­ serbų dominuojančios Jugosla­ atšaukė savo ambasadorių War- — Gegužės 12 dieną toliau dir­ kaltimų negu per tą patį pra­ vijos, kai serbų pajėgos tęsė ren Zimmerman iš Belgrado, bo Aukščiausiosios Tarybos pir­ ėjusių metų laiką. Apie 60 pro­ kovas prieš musulmonus ir protestuodama prieš serbų mojo šaukimo penktoji sesija. centų jų padaryta didžiuosiuose kroatus Bosnijos srityje. Žodžio paprašė deputatas Jo­ miestuose, tačiau visus pra­ agresiją. Europos Bendrijos pranešimas Serbija ir mažoji Montenegro kūbas Minkevičius. Jis pažy­ lenkia Rokiškis ir Šilalė, kur šio panaikinti diplomatinius ryšius mėjo, jog tai, kad 1940-1945 pobūdžio nusikaltimų padaugė­ respublika sudaro šiuo metu reiškia viešą protestą prieš naują dviejų respublikų federa­ metais jis buvo valstybinio sau­ jo daugiau nei pusantro karto. serbų įsikišimą į Bosnijos-Her­ gumo ir vidaus reikalų sistemos Ypač padidėjo valstybinio ir vi­ ciją, kuri tebesivadina Jugos­ zegovinos vidaus reikalus. lavija. etatinis darbuotojas, buvo suomeninio turto vagysčių Bendrijos valstybės labai Jungtinių Tautų atstovas žinoma. Todėl jam neturėtų būti vykstant privatizacijai žemės griežtai pasisakė prieš Serbiją ir Jose-Maria Mendiluce, kuris taikomas įstatymas dėl slaptųjų ūkyje, piktnaudžiaujama bankų įspėjo, kad imsis dar labiau turi daug patirties Trečiojo agentų išaiškinimo.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 04/10/2021 06:40:30
    Mamluk cavalry practices: Evolution and influence Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Nettles, Isolde Betty Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 06:40:30 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/289748 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this roproduction is dependent upon the quaiity of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that tfie author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g.. maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal secttons with small overlaps. Photograpiis included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6' x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrattons appearing in this copy for an additk)nal charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Lietuvos Istorijos Bibliografija. 2004
    LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS INSTITUTAS LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS BIBLIOGRAFIJA 2004 Sudarė IRENA TUMELYTĖ LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS INSTITUTAS VILNIUS, 2017 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE HISTORY OF LITHUANIA 2004 Compiler IRENA TUMELYTĖ Redakcinė kolegija: Zigmantas Kiaupa (pirmininkas) Rimantas Miknys Vladas Sirutavičius Juozas Tumelis ISSN 1392-981X © Lietuvos istorijos institutas, 2017 © Irena Tumelytė, 2017 TURINYS PRATARMĖ ............................................................................................................................... 7 1. BENDRASIS SKYRIUS ........................................................................................................ 9 1.1. Bibliografijos ....................................................................................................................... 9 a) bibliografijos ..................................................................................................................... 9 b) bibliografijos istorija ...................................................................................................... 10 c) personalinės bibliografijos .............................................................................................. 10 1.2. Enciklopedijos, žodynai ir žinynai .................................................................................... 10 1.3. Istorijos periodika ir tęstiniai leidiniai .............................................................................. 12 1.4. Istorijos mokslo institucijos, darbo organizavimas ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Titles, Seals and Coats of Arms As Symbols of Power and Importance of Lithuanian Dukes Before the Union of Lublin
    ZAPISKI HISTORYCZNE — TOM LXXXII — ROK 2017 Zeszyt 1 http://dx.doi.org/10.15762/ZH.2017.06 JAKUB ROGULSKI (Jagiellonian University in Kraków) Titles, Seals and Coats of Arms as Symbols of Power and Importance of Lithuanian Dukes Before the Union of Lublin Keywords: middle ages, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, parallel branches of a ruling house, dukes, demonstration of power, titulature, sigillography, heraldry Introduction The symbols1 of power and importance of Lithuanian dukes before the Union of Lublin have not become a separate subject of historians’ studies so far. In the historiography the largest attention has been drawn to the demon­ stration of power of the grand dukes of Lithuania, especially from the Jagiel­ lonian dynasty.2 Meanwhile, the signs which served to display the power or significance of other Lithuanian dukes have been raised incidentally and se­ lectively. The reason could be that in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania there 1 A symbol is understood in a way proposed by Charles S. Peirce, i.e. a material object which stands for or suggests something else (another object, idea, meaning, belief, action etc.) only on the basis of social convention, in contrast to the iconic sign based on similarity, and the indexical sign based on material contact: Charles Sanders Peirce, The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Bloomington (Indiana) 1998, p. 9. As this kind of sign will be the main subject of the following analysis, the word “symbol” will be further used interchangeably with the word “sign.” 2 See: Ryszard Kiersnowski, Godła Jagiellońskie, Wiadomości Numizmatyczne, vol. 2: 1988, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Arms, Armour and Art
    ARMS, ARMOUR AND ART by Claude Blair Serious interest in the study and collecting of early arms and armour began, as might be expected, with the 19th century Gothic Revival. It was stimulated by the number of examples brought into the art-market by the upheavals of the Napoleonic Wars, and also by the publication of Dr. (later Sir) Samuel Rush Mey rick’s seminal Critical Inquiiy into Anticnt Armour in 1824, and most of the great 19th and early 20th century art collectors, like Sir Richard Wallace and Henry Walters, acquired at least a few fine pieces. A change came after World War I, partly because of the growth of an anti-militarism which, though justified in itself, classified all arms - the gold-hiltcd 18th century small sword and the Vickers machine-gun alike - as implements of war. More significant, however, was the revulsion against Romanticism and all things Gothic, combined with the growing snobbery that divided the arts into ‘Fine’ and ‘Applied’, with the former always automatically given precedence. The absurd situation thus arose in which Henry Moore’s lumpen ‘Helmet’ would be regarded as an important work of art, and a fine 15th-century Italian helmet of the shape from which it was derived would not, though the latter might be infinitely 1. Gold parade helmet of Meskalcm-dug in the form ofa wig c. 2600 B.C. superior as a piece of abstract sculpture! Few of the great art From the royal tombs at Ur, now in Iraq. Xatioual Museum, Baghdad. collectors now acquired arms and armour — William and a famous gold dagger which, in the words of its discoverer, Randolph Hearst being a notable exception - and the subject, Leonard Woolley, is ‘a wonderful weapon whose blade..
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Survey of the Armouries of the Tower of London. Vol. I
    THE ARMOVRIES OF THE TOWER OF LONDON MCMXVI McKEW PARR COLLECTION MAGELLAN and the AGE of DISCOVERY PRESENTED TO BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY • 1961 1 > SeR-GEokGE Ho\W\RDE KNfioHTAASTEFl oF THE Q.WEN£S*AA)EST/FS ARMORYAWODOn, <»^^= — ^F^H5^— r^l 5 6. : INVENTORY AND SURVEY OF THE Armouries OF THE Tower of London BY CHARLES J. FFOULKES, B.Litt.Oxon, F.S.A. CURATOR OF THE ARMOURIES n> Volume I. r LONDON Published by His Majesty's Stationery Office Book Plate of the Record Office in the Tower by J. MYNDE circa 1760 To The King's Most Excellent Majesty SIRE, laying this History and Inventory of the Armouries of the Tower INof London before Your Majesty, I cannot but feel that, in a work of this nature, it would be unfitting that I should take credit for more than the compilation and collation of a large amount of work done by others in the past. In tracing the changes that have taken place from the time when the Tower was a Storehouse of Military Equipment up to the present day, when it is the resting place of a Collection of Royal and Historical Armours many of which are without equal in Europe, I have availed myself of the National Records and also of the generous assistance of living authorities who have made a special study of the several subjects which are dealt with in these pages. I therefore ask Your Majesty's gracious permission to acknowledge here my indebtedness and gratitude to my predecessor Viscount Dillon, first Curator of the Armouries, who has unreservedly placed at my disposal the vast amount of notes, photographs, and researches, which he had collected during over twenty years of office.
    [Show full text]
  • Titles, Seals and Coats of Arms As Symbols of Power and Importance of Lithuanian Dukes Before the Union of Lublin
    ZA P ISKI HISTORY C ZNE — TOM LXXXII — ROK 2017 Zeszyt 1 http://dx.doi.org./10.15762/ZH.2017.06 JAKUB ROGULSKI (Jagiellonian University in Kraków) Titles, Seals and Coats of Arms as Symbols of Power and Importance of Lithuanian Dukes Before the Union of Lublin Keywords: middle ages, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, parallel branches of a ruling house, dukes, demonstration of power, titulature, sigillography, heraldry Introduction The symbols1 of power and importance of Lithuanian dukes before the Union of Lublin have not become a separate subject of historians’ studies so far. In the historiography the largest attention has been drawn to the demon- stration of power of the grand dukes of Lithuania, especially from the Jagiel- lonian dynasty.2 Meanwhile, the signs which served to display the power or significance of other Lithuanian dukes have been raised incidentally and se- lectively.3 The reason could be that in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania there 1 A symbol is understood in a way proposed by Charles S. Peirce, i.e. a material object which stands for or suggests something else (another object, idea, meaning, belief, action etc.) only on the basis of social convention, in contrast to the iconic sign based on similarity, and the indexical sign based on material contact: Charles Sanders Peirce, The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Bloomington (Indiana) 1998, p. 9. As this kind of sign will be the main subject of the following analysis, the word “symbol” will be further used interchangeably with the word “sign.” 2 See: Ryszard Kiersnowski, Godła Jagiellońskie, Wiadomości Numizmatyczne, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Gediminaichj Kunigaikstystes Ldk Rytq Pasienyje Xiv Amziuje- Xv Amziaus Pradzioje
    MOKSLINIAI STRAIPSNIAI LIETUVOS DIDZIOSIOS KUNIGAIKSTYSTEs PILYS GEDIMINAICHJ KUNIGAIKSTYSTES LDK RYTQ PASIENYJE XIV AMZIUJE- XV AMZIAUS PRADZIOJE VYTAS JANKAUSKAS Vytas Jankauskas - istorikas, Vytauto Didziojo universiteto Is torijos katedros doktorantas, Vilniaus kolegijos Humanitarinizt moksh; katedros lektorius. Su zurnalu Lietuvos pilys bendradarbiauja nuo 2006 m. Yra paske lb~s serijq straipsnizt apie GediminaiCizt dinastijos istorijq ir Lietuvos Didziosios Kunigaikstystes teritorijzt pletrq XIV-XV a. Jvadas ropos ,uzsienio politikoje". 3 Toks problemas traktavimas reiskia, kad nuolatine valstybes pletra pirmiausia tenkino GediminaiCiq dinastijos nariq vidaus santykiai yra valdovo ir dinastijos, ar bent jau dinastijos eli to, poreikius. daugialype problema, kuril! nelengva paprastai issprysti. Siame darbe bus aptarta, kaip dinastija funkcionavo Bandymai analizuoti remiasi daugiausia netiesioginiais rytll pasienyje, keliant sau tiksl'l, isskirti ,elitintt" ir ,ne duomenimis. Vienas is galimq budq pabandyti atsakyti j elitintt" grupy Gediminaici4 dinastijos viduje. Tai ne tik klausimus- per:liureti, kokios administracines funkcijos paaiskintll XIV a. dinastijos viduje vykusius hierarchiza­ buvo suteikiamos dinastijos nariams valstybes periferijo­ cijos procesus, bet ir padetq atskleisti, kaip dinastija pa­ je, o kartu ir kaip konkretus kunigaikstis galejo jomis naudojo teritorinius laimejimus. Kadangi siuo aspektu pasinaudoti veikdamas dinastijos viduje ir kokias pers­ LDK dinastijos nariq vidaus santykiai beveik netyrineti, pektyvas
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Crusades. Episode 290. the Baltic Crusades. the Samogitian Crusade Part XXII
    History of the Crusades. Episode 290. The Baltic Crusades. The Samogitian Crusade Part XXII. Grand Master Konrad von Wallenrode. Hello again. Last week we followed the Crusaders on campaign to Lithuania, where the Crusaders attacked the Lithuanian town of Vilnius with the ultimate aim of securing the town, defeating Jogaila and Skirgaila, and elevating their man Vytautas to the position of ruler of Lithuania. None of these events came to pass, but it did result in one crusader, Henry Bolingbroke, the future King of England, drinking a lot of beer with his men. We also saw last week the death of Grand Master Konrad Zollner von Rothenstein and his replacement by another Konrad: Konrad von Wallenrode. Now, William Urban points out in his book "The Samogitian Crusade" that, as the current Grand Commander of the Teutonic Order, Konrad von Wallenrode was the obvious standout candidate to be elected as the next Grand Master. The Wallenrode family had played prominent roles inside the Teutonic Order for some time, and Konrad von Wallenrode had enjoyed success as Grand Commander. Despite this though, there were apparently significant misgivings inside the Teutonic Order about the appointment of Konrad von Wallenrode are to the position of Grand Master. Why? Well, because Konrad von Wallenrode was a military man, through and through. In fact, to say that Konrad von Wallenrode had little or no interest in religion wasn't too much of an exaggeration, and William Urban reports that Konrad took so little notice of priests and God that he was once accused of heresy. The worst fears of the religious men of the Order seemed to have been realised when, after being elected as Grand Master, one of Konrad von Wallenrode first acts was to reform the command structure inside the Order to increase his authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavardžių Rodyklė
    PAVARDÞIØ RODYKLË Abramovièius (Abramovicz) 258 Bakðys J. 205, 212 Abramsonas Ð. 179 Bakutis B. 349 Adomaitis-Ðernas J. 148, 154, 155 Balèikonis J. 206 Adomavièius 443 Balinskis M. 311 Albanas 124 Baltruðaièiai 155 Albrechtas 126 Baltruðaitis P. 167 Aldona, Gedimino dukra 14, 33 Balutis B. 191, 359, 428, 429, 433, Alekna A. 104, 435 Aleksa-Angarietis Z. – þr. Angarietis- Banaitis S. 223, 229 Aleksa Z. Baranovas E. 117 Aleksandras 57, 58, 84, 85, 86, 87, Barauskas K. 205 Aleksandras I 80, 93 Bartuðka V. 214, 360 Aleksandras II 94, 104 Basanavièius J. 126, 128, 129, 143, Aleksandras III 103, 198 144, 147, 156, 157, 167, 171, 173, Algirdas 19, 24, 33, 34, 35, 52, 463 174, 174, 177, 178, 181, 182, 183, Aliðauskas K. 410 205, 206, 209, 212, 220, 221, 222, Ambroþevièius J. 173, 223, 229, 474 Andraðûnas J. 440 Basanius – þr. Basanavièius J. Andrejev A. 267 Batoras S. 66, 108, Andziulaitis-Kalnënas J. 177, Baueris (Bauer) G. 347 Angarietis-Aleksa Z. (Aleksa- Bejnaris 447, 448 Angarietis) 255, 263, 265, 270, Beleckis K. 246, 405, 409, 480, 481 Beliakas-Bielinis J. 121, Antanavièius 171, Bendoraitis J. 460 Anþu (d’ Anjou) Karolis Robertas Beniovskis A. 319 14 Beresnevièius 142, Anþu (d’Anjou) Liudvikas I 15 Bermontas-Avalovas (Bermont- Arsevièius S. 285, Avalov) P. 313, 343, 344, 350, 351 Augustas II 43, 72 Bernotavièius F. 311 Augustas III Saksas 74 Bersonas S. 270, Aukðtuolaitis J. 297, 304 Berþinskis 164, Aviþonis P. 155 Bialozoras J. 43 Bieleckis J. 280 Bagdonas J. 148, 154, 155, 166, 167, Bielinis J. 123, 167, 170, 174 176, 181 Bielskus P.
    [Show full text]
  • Pietro Monte
    THE COLLECTION OF RENAISSANCE MILITARY ARTS AND EXERCISES OF PIETRO MONTE A TRANSLATION OF THE EXERCITIORUM ATQUE ARTIS MILITARIS COLLECTANEA BY MIKE PRENDERGAST AND INGRID SPERBER THE COLLECTION OF RENAISSANCE MILITARY ARTS AND EXERCISES OF PIETRO MONTE Translation © 2018 Mike Prendergast Translation by Mike Prendergast and Dr. Ingrid Sperber. This translation is freely available for non-commercial use. THE TRANSLATORS MIKE PRENDERGAST Mike Prendergast has been researching, practising and teaching historical strategy and martial arts since 1999. His main focus is on the art of fencing of Renaissance Italy. Initially studying Bolognese fencing, he moved to specialise in the system of Fiore dei Liberi (c. 1410) and the rapier style of Nicoletto Giganti (1606), before embarking on his study of Monte. Having initially started with Japanese martial arts, Mike discovered historical European fencing through the international medievalist group, the Society for Creative Anachronism, where he has received the society's highest award for research, the Laurel. In 2015 he was appointed one of the three premier Masters of Defence for the European branch of the society. Mike instructs in rapier and longsword with SCA Dun in Mara and interprets and teaches the martial arts of Pietro Monte, as chief instructor with the Historical Combat Academy, in Dublin, Ireland. He also teaches internationally at Historical European Martial Arts events and hosted the 2015 International Rapier Seminar. Mike competes internationally in tournaments and has taken medals in a variety of weapon forms including gold in rapier and sword & buckler. He also trained for several years in Hyoho Niten Ichi Ryu, the traditional Japanese style of swordsmanship founded by the famous duellist and strategist Miyamoto Musashi.
    [Show full text]