History of the Crusades. Episode 290. the Baltic Crusades. the Samogitian Crusade Part XXII
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lietuvos Respublikos Aukščiausiosios Tarybos Sesijoje Europos Bendrija
IŠEIVIJOS LIETUVIŲ DIENRAŠTIS 4545 VVEST 63rd STREET • CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60629 TELEFONAS (312) 585-9500 TELEFAKSAS (312) 585-8284 TU LITULJ/VIVJI/VrM \A/OF*LO-WIO& DAILY Vol. LXXXIII Kaina 35 c. KETIVRTADIENIS - THURSDAY, GEGUŽĖ - MAY 14, 1992 Nr. 94 Lietuvos Respublikos . Europos Bendrija atšaukė Aukščiausiosios Tarybos ambasadorius sesijoje Amerika pasekė Europos pavyzdžiu Belgradas. Gegužės 12. — Atšaukė ambasadorių Trečiadienio žinios iš Lietuvos Dvylika Europos valstybių at Washingtone taip pat Busho šaukė savo ambasadorius iš administracija paskelbė, jog Vilnius. Gegužės 13 d. (Elta) liu daugiau ekonominių nusi serbų dominuojančios Jugosla atšaukė savo ambasadorių War- — Gegužės 12 dieną toliau dir kaltimų negu per tą patį pra vijos, kai serbų pajėgos tęsė ren Zimmerman iš Belgrado, bo Aukščiausiosios Tarybos pir ėjusių metų laiką. Apie 60 pro kovas prieš musulmonus ir protestuodama prieš serbų mojo šaukimo penktoji sesija. centų jų padaryta didžiuosiuose kroatus Bosnijos srityje. Žodžio paprašė deputatas Jo miestuose, tačiau visus pra agresiją. Europos Bendrijos pranešimas Serbija ir mažoji Montenegro kūbas Minkevičius. Jis pažy lenkia Rokiškis ir Šilalė, kur šio panaikinti diplomatinius ryšius mėjo, jog tai, kad 1940-1945 pobūdžio nusikaltimų padaugė respublika sudaro šiuo metu reiškia viešą protestą prieš naują dviejų respublikų federa metais jis buvo valstybinio sau jo daugiau nei pusantro karto. serbų įsikišimą į Bosnijos-Her gumo ir vidaus reikalų sistemos Ypač padidėjo valstybinio ir vi ciją, kuri tebesivadina Jugos zegovinos vidaus reikalus. lavija. etatinis darbuotojas, buvo suomeninio turto vagysčių Bendrijos valstybės labai Jungtinių Tautų atstovas žinoma. Todėl jam neturėtų būti vykstant privatizacijai žemės griežtai pasisakė prieš Serbiją ir Jose-Maria Mendiluce, kuris taikomas įstatymas dėl slaptųjų ūkyje, piktnaudžiaujama bankų įspėjo, kad imsis dar labiau turi daug patirties Trečiojo agentų išaiškinimo. -
Algirdas Matonis 772 Greenfield Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 [email protected] Mobile No: +1 412 961 2559
Algirdas Matonis 772 Greenfield Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 [email protected] Mobile No: +1 412 961 2559 Professional Experience 2015 – Present: River City Brass Band Principal Euphonium Player Key Responsibilities • Ensure a successful concert preparation for Euphonium and Baritone section • Playing solo performances with the band • Find substitute players in case of absence of assigned section member • Judge auditions for new players 2016 – Present River City Youth Brass Band Low Brass Instructor Key Responsibilities • Low brass sectional coaching • Full band coaching • Auditioning seat placements for low brass 2018 – Present Duquesne University Mary Pappert School of Music Adjunct Professor of Euphonium Key Responsibilities: • Teach one on one lessons to euphonium students or any other assigned brass students • Teach a studio class for low brass students • Prepare students for jury exams, auditions and end year recitals • Prepare students for ensemble assignments • Grade jury exams and recitals • Recruit new students • Judge euphonium applicant for school of music Education 2010 – 2014 Royal Northern College of Music in Manchester Bachelor in Euphonium Performance 2015 – 2017 Carnegie Mellon University Advanced Music Studies in Euphonium Performance, Orchestral Track Additional Qualifications 2006 “Trakai Fanfare Week”, Lithuania Masterclasses with Steven Mead, Fritz Damrow, Bert Langeler 2007 “Trakai Fanfare Week”, Lithuania Masterclasses with Steven Mead, Fritz Damrow, Bert Langeler, Marius Balcytis 2008 “Trakai Fanfare Week”, -
History of the Crusades. Episode 280. the Baltic Crusades. the Samogitian Crusade Part XIII
History of the Crusades. Episode 280. The Baltic Crusades. The Samogitian Crusade Part XIII. The Siege of Kaunas 1362. Hello again. Last week, we saw an effort by the Archbishop of Prague to convert the Lithuanian leaders to Christianity fail spectacularly, with the two pagan brothers making outrageous demands in return for their baptism, then laughing at and mocking the delegation when they objected. The upshot of this event was that converting the Lithuanians to Christianity by peaceful means was now permanently off the table as a goal to be pursued, so the only option left on the table was to convert the pagans by force. The Teutonic Order then spent time and effort constructing a bunch of new castles in Samogitia, which would provide a larger, more permanent Latin Christian presence in the region. Then, in the spring of the year 1362, fighting men from across Prussia, along with crusaders from Germany, Italy and England, gathered in Prussia, ready to head to Samogitia. This was to be a major Crusading expedition. William Urban describes it in his book "The Samogitian Crusade" as being a, and I quote, "huge force" end quote. Now you will notice that the Crusaders are departing in spring, not winter. That's because they don't need to ride across frozen rivers and swamps to get to Samogitia. Why don't they need to ride across frozen rivers and swamps to get to Samogitia? Well, because they are sailing there. Yes, in a novel break from tradition, the Grand Master and the Marshall of the Teutonic forces have come up with a plan to get everyone on board ships. -
Lietuvos Istorijos Bibliografija. 2004
LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS INSTITUTAS LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS BIBLIOGRAFIJA 2004 Sudarė IRENA TUMELYTĖ LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS INSTITUTAS VILNIUS, 2017 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE HISTORY OF LITHUANIA 2004 Compiler IRENA TUMELYTĖ Redakcinė kolegija: Zigmantas Kiaupa (pirmininkas) Rimantas Miknys Vladas Sirutavičius Juozas Tumelis ISSN 1392-981X © Lietuvos istorijos institutas, 2017 © Irena Tumelytė, 2017 TURINYS PRATARMĖ ............................................................................................................................... 7 1. BENDRASIS SKYRIUS ........................................................................................................ 9 1.1. Bibliografijos ....................................................................................................................... 9 a) bibliografijos ..................................................................................................................... 9 b) bibliografijos istorija ...................................................................................................... 10 c) personalinės bibliografijos .............................................................................................. 10 1.2. Enciklopedijos, žodynai ir žinynai .................................................................................... 10 1.3. Istorijos periodika ir tęstiniai leidiniai .............................................................................. 12 1.4. Istorijos mokslo institucijos, darbo organizavimas .......................................................... -
Titles, Seals and Coats of Arms As Symbols of Power and Importance of Lithuanian Dukes Before the Union of Lublin
ZAPISKI HISTORYCZNE — TOM LXXXII — ROK 2017 Zeszyt 1 http://dx.doi.org/10.15762/ZH.2017.06 JAKUB ROGULSKI (Jagiellonian University in Kraków) Titles, Seals and Coats of Arms as Symbols of Power and Importance of Lithuanian Dukes Before the Union of Lublin Keywords: middle ages, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, parallel branches of a ruling house, dukes, demonstration of power, titulature, sigillography, heraldry Introduction The symbols1 of power and importance of Lithuanian dukes before the Union of Lublin have not become a separate subject of historians’ studies so far. In the historiography the largest attention has been drawn to the demon stration of power of the grand dukes of Lithuania, especially from the Jagiel lonian dynasty.2 Meanwhile, the signs which served to display the power or significance of other Lithuanian dukes have been raised incidentally and se lectively. The reason could be that in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania there 1 A symbol is understood in a way proposed by Charles S. Peirce, i.e. a material object which stands for or suggests something else (another object, idea, meaning, belief, action etc.) only on the basis of social convention, in contrast to the iconic sign based on similarity, and the indexical sign based on material contact: Charles Sanders Peirce, The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Bloomington (Indiana) 1998, p. 9. As this kind of sign will be the main subject of the following analysis, the word “symbol” will be further used interchangeably with the word “sign.” 2 See: Ryszard Kiersnowski, Godła Jagiellońskie, Wiadomości Numizmatyczne, vol. 2: 1988, pp. -
The Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Beginning of the 15Th
THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA IN THE BEGINNING OF THE 15 TH CENTURY A er the death of Grand Duke Algirdas (1345–1377), his son Jogaila became the leader. In order to divert all a ention to the East, Jogaila signed a secret agreement with the Order, known as the Treaty of Dovydiškės, according to which the Order was free to a ack the lands belonging to Algirdas’ brother Kęstutis and his son, Vytautas. e Order informed Kęstutis of this agreement and in so doing initiated a civil war in Lithuania. At + rst, Kęstutis removed Jogaila from his seat of power, however, in 1382, Jogaila conquered Vilnius and imprisoned Kęstutis and Vytautas. Kęstutis was held prisoner in Krėva Castle, and was strangled by Jogaila’s servants. Vytautas managed to escape and sought protection with the Crusaders. Vytautas and Jogaila made peace in 1384, yet Jogaila once again failed to keep his promise to return Vytautas his fatherland, the Duchy of Trakai. In 1390–1392 Vytautas again appealed to the Order for assistance to go to war against Jogaila. Jogaila, who by now spent most of his time in Poland, could see that his appointed vicegerent, his brother Skirgaila, was unable to manage the internal opposition and so, once again made peace with Vytautas in 1392. at same year Vytautas became the actual leader of Lithuania, and o6 cially assumed this position in 1401. Wishing to reinforce Lithuania’s supremacy in the East – in the Ruzen and Tatars’ lands, Vytautas and the Order agreed on the Treaty of Salynas. According to this agreement, Vytautas relinquished Samogitia as far as Nevėžis and Kaunas as far as Rumšiškės to the Order. -
Dark Times: Art and Artists of Vilnius in 1939–1941
326 Dark Times: Art and Artists of Vilnius in 1939–1941 Giedrė Jankevičiūtė Vilnius Academy of Arts Maironio St. 6, LT-01124 Vilnius e-mail: [email protected] The aim of this paper is to discuss and reconstruct in general fe- atures the reality of the Vilnius artistic community from late autumn 1939 to June 1941. This period of less than two years significantly changed the configuration of the artistic community of the city, the system of institutions shaping the art scene as well as the artistic goals. It also brought forth new names and inspired new images. These changes were above all determined by political circumstances: the war that broke out in Poland on 1 September 1939; the ceding of Vilnius and the Vilnius region to Lithuania; two Soviet occupations: in the autumn of 1939 and June 1940, and the subsequent Nazi occupation a year later. The influence of politics on the art scene and the life of artists has been explored in institutional and other aspects by both Lithuanian and Polish art historians, but the big picture is not yet complete, and the general narrative is still under construction. A further aim of this paper is to highlight some elements that have not received sufficient atten- tion in historiography and that are necessary for the reconstruction of the whole. Some facts of cooperation or its absence among artists of various ethnicities are presented, and the question is raised on the extent to which these different groups were affected by Sovietisation, and what impact this fragmentation had on the city’s art scene. -
HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITORS George G
HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITORS George G. Grabowicz and Edward L. Keenan, Harvard University ASSOCIATE EDITORS Michael S. Flier, Lubomyr Hajda, and Roman Szporluk, Harvard University; Frank E. Sysyn, University of Alberta FOUNDING EDITORS Omeljan Pritsak and Ihor Sevienko, Harvard University MANAGING EDITOR Andrew Sorokowski BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Larry Wolff BUSINESS MANAGER Olga К. Mayo EDITORIAL BOARD Zvi Ankori, Tel Aviv University—John A. Armstrong, University of Wisconsin—Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delaware—Bohdan R. Bociurkiw, Carleton University, Ottawa—Axinia Djurova, University of Sofia—Olexa Horbatsch, University of Frankfurt—Halil inalcık, University of Chi- cago—Jaroslav D. Isajevych, Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, L'viv— Edward Kasinec, New York Public Library—Magdalena László-Kutiuk, University of Bucharest— Walter Leitsch, University of Vienna—L. R. Lewitter, Cambridge University—G. Luciani, University of Bordeaux—George S. N. Luckyj, University of Toronto—M. Łesiów, Marie Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin—Paul R. Magocsi, University of Toronto—Dimitri Obolensky, Oxford Univer- sity—Riccardo Picchio, Yale University—Marc Raeff, Columbia University—Hans Rothe, University of Bonn—Bohdan Rubchak, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle—Władysław A. Serczyk, University of Warsaw at Białystok—George Y. Shevelov, Columbia University—Günther Stökl, University of Cologne—A. de Vincenz, University of Göttingen—Vaclav Żidlicky, Charles Univer- sity, Prague. COMMITTEE ON UKRAINIAN STUDIES, Harvard University Stanisław Barańczak George G. Grabowicz (Chairman) Timothy Colton Edward L. Keenan Michael S. Flier Roman Szporluk Subscription rates per volume (two double issues) are $28.00 U.S. in the United States and Canada, $32.00 in other countries. The price of one double issue is $18.00 ($20.00 overseas). -
Titles, Seals and Coats of Arms As Symbols of Power and Importance of Lithuanian Dukes Before the Union of Lublin
ZA P ISKI HISTORY C ZNE — TOM LXXXII — ROK 2017 Zeszyt 1 http://dx.doi.org./10.15762/ZH.2017.06 JAKUB ROGULSKI (Jagiellonian University in Kraków) Titles, Seals and Coats of Arms as Symbols of Power and Importance of Lithuanian Dukes Before the Union of Lublin Keywords: middle ages, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, parallel branches of a ruling house, dukes, demonstration of power, titulature, sigillography, heraldry Introduction The symbols1 of power and importance of Lithuanian dukes before the Union of Lublin have not become a separate subject of historians’ studies so far. In the historiography the largest attention has been drawn to the demon- stration of power of the grand dukes of Lithuania, especially from the Jagiel- lonian dynasty.2 Meanwhile, the signs which served to display the power or significance of other Lithuanian dukes have been raised incidentally and se- lectively.3 The reason could be that in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania there 1 A symbol is understood in a way proposed by Charles S. Peirce, i.e. a material object which stands for or suggests something else (another object, idea, meaning, belief, action etc.) only on the basis of social convention, in contrast to the iconic sign based on similarity, and the indexical sign based on material contact: Charles Sanders Peirce, The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Bloomington (Indiana) 1998, p. 9. As this kind of sign will be the main subject of the following analysis, the word “symbol” will be further used interchangeably with the word “sign.” 2 See: Ryszard Kiersnowski, Godła Jagiellońskie, Wiadomości Numizmatyczne, vol. -
The Lithuanian Nobility in the Late- Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: Composition and Structure
LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 7 2002 ISSN 1392-2343 pp. 1–22 THE LITHUANIAN NOBILITY IN THE LATE- FOURTEENTH AND FIFTEENTH CENTURIES: COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE RIMVYDAS PETRAUSKAS ABSTRACT This paper presents a critical review of the historiographically dominant theory stating that the upper layer of the Lithuanian nobility formed its independent power only around the middle of the fifteenth century. The extant sources shed little light on the role of the nobility in the political processes of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. A complex of sources, more fully reflecting the specifics of the country, appeared only after the arrival of writing in Lithuania at the end of the fourteenth century. It was only in this period that the place of the nobles in the system of government became evident. Therefore, it is possible to speak about a distorted perspective, suggested by the early records. The paper presents a definition of the nobility and an analysis of the origin, composition and structure of the Lithuanian ruling élite in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Consequently it is possible to speak about the prerequisites of the rule of this social group and the duality of the power of the grand duke and the nobility. Two principal tendencies of the development of the Lithuanian nobility in the fifteenth century – personal continuity and internal transformation (family structure) – are distinguished. In Lithuanian historical models the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries have acquired the image of the epoch of ‘ducal Lithuania’. This was a period of the rule of the grand dukes Gediminas, Algirdas, Kęstutis, Jogaila and Vytautas. -
Gediminaichj Kunigaikstystes Ldk Rytq Pasienyje Xiv Amziuje- Xv Amziaus Pradzioje
MOKSLINIAI STRAIPSNIAI LIETUVOS DIDZIOSIOS KUNIGAIKSTYSTEs PILYS GEDIMINAICHJ KUNIGAIKSTYSTES LDK RYTQ PASIENYJE XIV AMZIUJE- XV AMZIAUS PRADZIOJE VYTAS JANKAUSKAS Vytas Jankauskas - istorikas, Vytauto Didziojo universiteto Is torijos katedros doktorantas, Vilniaus kolegijos Humanitarinizt moksh; katedros lektorius. Su zurnalu Lietuvos pilys bendradarbiauja nuo 2006 m. Yra paske lb~s serijq straipsnizt apie GediminaiCizt dinastijos istorijq ir Lietuvos Didziosios Kunigaikstystes teritorijzt pletrq XIV-XV a. Jvadas ropos ,uzsienio politikoje". 3 Toks problemas traktavimas reiskia, kad nuolatine valstybes pletra pirmiausia tenkino GediminaiCiq dinastijos nariq vidaus santykiai yra valdovo ir dinastijos, ar bent jau dinastijos eli to, poreikius. daugialype problema, kuril! nelengva paprastai issprysti. Siame darbe bus aptarta, kaip dinastija funkcionavo Bandymai analizuoti remiasi daugiausia netiesioginiais rytll pasienyje, keliant sau tiksl'l, isskirti ,elitintt" ir ,ne duomenimis. Vienas is galimq budq pabandyti atsakyti j elitintt" grupy Gediminaici4 dinastijos viduje. Tai ne tik klausimus- per:liureti, kokios administracines funkcijos paaiskintll XIV a. dinastijos viduje vykusius hierarchiza buvo suteikiamos dinastijos nariams valstybes periferijo cijos procesus, bet ir padetq atskleisti, kaip dinastija pa je, o kartu ir kaip konkretus kunigaikstis galejo jomis naudojo teritorinius laimejimus. Kadangi siuo aspektu pasinaudoti veikdamas dinastijos viduje ir kokias pers LDK dinastijos nariq vidaus santykiai beveik netyrineti, pektyvas -
Kaplica Św. Anny Na Zamku Wysokim W Malborku : Zarys Dziejów Rekonstrukcji Na Przełomie XIX I XX W
Ryszard Rząd Kaplica św. Anny na Zamku Wysokim w Malborku : zarys dziejów rekonstrukcji na przełomie XIX i XX w. Ochrona Zabytków 47/2 (185), 185-196 1994 KOMUNIKATY, DYSKUSJE Ryszard Rząd KAPLICA SW. ANNY NA ZAMKU WYSOKIM W MALBORKU — ZARYS DZIEJÓW REKONSTRUKCJI NA PRZEŁOMIE XIX I XX W. Kaplica pw. św. Anny powstała w czasie wielkiej Zamkowym oraz Archiwum Państwowym w Elblągu rozbudowy Zamku Wysokiego w latach 1334-1344. z siedzibą w Malborku. Wśród nich znajduje się seria Od chwili wzniesienia traktowana była jako miejsce albumów fotograficznych, zwanych Mańenburg pochówków wielkich mistrzów Zakonu Niemieckie Baujahr z lat 1882-19204, kilka wydanych drukiem go. Od 1457 r. prawdopodobnie nie pełniła już fun sprawozdań rocznych, nieliczne inwentaryzacje (rzu kcji kultowych. W związku z tym popadała stopnio ty i przekroje) oraz kilka projektów do poszczegól wo w zapomnienie. Odbiło się to także na jej stanie, nych detali wyposażenia5. Niezbyt bogaty jest zestaw który pogarszał się z biegiem lat. Jej dzieje w tym literatury na ten temat. Stosunkowo dużo informacji okresie mogłyby być tematem osobnego opracowa znaleźć można jedynie w pracy B. Schmida Die Wie nia. Jednak w niniejszym szkicu pragnę jedynie zre derherstellung der Mańenburg wydanej w Królewcu lacjonować przebieg prac konserwatorskich z przeło w 1941 r. Pomocniczą rolę spełnia polska powojenna mu XIX i XX w. i opisać ówczesny wygląd obiektu dokumentacja opracowana na początku lat sześćdzie i jego bogaty wystrój, poważnie zniszczony w czasie siątych przez gdański oddział Pracowni Konserwacji II wojny światowej1. Zabytków6. W 1882 r. kierownikiem Zarządu Odbudowy Zam Poniższe rozdziały zawierają dane historyczne na ku w Malborku (Schlossbauverwaltung Mańenburg) temat najważniejszych elementów wystroju wnętrza został architekt Konrad Steinbrecht (1849-1923).