DOCSLIB.ORG

WORLD SPACECRAFT DIGEST by Jos Heyman 2013 Version: 1 January 2014 © Copyright Jos Heyman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WORLD SPACECRAFT DIGEST by Jos Heyman 2013 Version: 1 January 2014 © Copyright Jos Heyman WORLD SPACECRAFT DIGEST by Jos Heyman 2013 Version: 1 January 2014 © Copyright Jos Heyman The spacecraft are listed, in the first instance, in the order of their International Designation, resulting in, with some exceptions, a date order. Spacecraft which did not receive an International Designation, being those spacecraft which failed to achieve orbit or those which were placed in a sub orbital trajectory, have been inserted in the date order. For each spacecraft the following information is provided: a. International Designation and NORAD number For each spacecraft the International Designation, as allocated by the International Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), has been used as the primary means to identify the spacecraft. This is followed by the NORAD catalogue number which has been assigned to each object in space, including debris etc., in a numerical sequence, rather than a chronoligical sequence. Normally no reference has been made to spent launch vehicles, capsules ejected by the spacecraft or fragments except where such have a unique identification which warrants consideration as a separate spacecraft or in other circumstances which warrants their mention. b. Name The most common name of the spacecraft has been quoted. In some cases, such as for US military spacecraft, the name may have been deduced from published information and may not necessarily be the official name. Alternative names have, however, been mentioned in the description and have also been included in the index. c. Country/International Agency For each spacecraft the name of the country or international agency which owned or had prime responsibility for the spacecraft, or in which the owner resided, has been included. d. Launch date This is the launch date expressed in UTC. Where a spacecraft has been released from another space vehicle, including the Space Shuttle, the date of release has been used, as it is considered that was the date on which the spacecraft became a separate identity in space rather than on the day it was launched from the Earth. e. Re-entry This refers either to the decay date that the spacecraft burnt up in the atmosphere, or the date on which a controlled recovery took place. In selected cases, as indicated in the text, the re-entry date is the date on which the spacecraft ceased to be an entity in its own right. f. Launch Site Reference to launch site is to a geographical site rather than the named site. For example, the Kennedy Space Centre and Canaveral Air Force Station are both referred to as Cape Canaveral. g. Launch Vehicle Launch vehicles have been designated by their commonly known names. It does not include the launch vehicle’s serial number. h. Orbital parameters The orbital parameters have been obtained from Space-Track.org. For those satellite for which the orbital parameters were not formally published (in particular for US military satellites) estimated orbital parameters based on amateur observations have been shown. In most cases the first orbital parameters were chosen but, where deemed appropriate, the operational orbit has been shown. This is particularly the case with spacecraft in geostationary orbit where reference is made to the geographical longitude over which the spacecraft was placed. Only in selected instances has mention been made of subsequent orbtal parameters due to significant maneuvers as well as relocation in geostationary orbit. i. Details For each spacecraft details have been provided to readily understand the objective of the spacecraft. Information has also been provided about the instruments carried by spacecraft although, as a rule, no reference has been made to basic equipment for telemetry and spacecraft housekeeping. In a number of instances, the progress and results of the flight of a spacecraft have been discussed. Where appropriate, the mass of a spacecraft refers to the empty mass. Where a spacecraft was related to a series of similar spacecraft reference has been made to the detailed description of such a series which has usually been included in the description of the first spacecraft of that series. Details peculiar to a specific member of a series remain, however, with that specific spacecraft. j. Illustrations Illustrations, where provided, are not captioned except where it was deemed necessary to provide essential information on the illustration. The majority of illustrations were obtained from obvious sources such as space agencies, manufacturers, organisations responsible for the respective satellites and launch vehicle operators and are, as far as is known, not subject to copyright. As such, the sources have not been recorded, except in special circumstances. The author would welcome any additional information, comments and suggestions. Jos Heyman 86 Barnevelder Bend Southern River, WA6110 Australia e-mail: [email protected] January 2014 2013 001A (39057) Name: Kosmos-2482 Country: Russia Launch date: 15 January 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Plesetsk Launch vehicle: Rokot/Briz KM Orbit: 1473 x 1516 km, inclination: 82.4 ° Rodnik military communications satellite as described for 2005 048B. 2013 001B (39058) Name: Kosmos-2483 Country: Russia Launch date: 15 January 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Plesetsk Launch vehicle: Rokot/Briz KM Orbit: 1478 x 1502 km, inclination: 82.4 ° Rodnik military communications satellite as described for 2005 048B. It is believed that this satellite did not become operational. 2013 001C (39059) Name: Kosmos-2484 Country: Russia Launch date: 15 January 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Plesetsk Launch vehicle: Rokot/Briz KM Orbit: 1475 x 1514 km, inclination: 82.4 ° Rodnik military communications satellite as described for 2005 048B. 2013 002A (39061) Name: IGS-8A Country: Japan Launch date: 27 January 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Tanegashima Launch vehicle: H 2A-202 Orbit: 509 x 514 km, inclination: 97.5 ° Military reconnaissance satellite as described for 2003 009B. It has also been referred to as Reda-4 and Radar-4. 2013 002B (39062) Name: IGS-8B Country: Japan Launch date: 27 January 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Tanegashima Launch vehicle: H 2A Orbit: 512 x 523 km, inclination: 97.5 ° Military reconnaissance satellite as described for 2003 009B. It was a technology demonstration flight for an optical imaging payload. It has also been referred to as Kougaku-5 Demo and Optical-5 Demo. --- Name: Kavoshgar Pishgam Country: Iran Launch date: 28 January 2013 Re-entry: n.a. Launch site: Semnan Launch vehicle: Fateh K110 (?) Orbit: sub-orbital to 120 km Sub-orbital flight to test the recovery of a Capsule type C that carried a monkey. The monkey, named Aftab, was successfully recovered although at a subsequent press conference a different monkey was shown, casting doubt about the result. 2013 003A (39068) Name: STSAT-2C Country: South Korea Launch date: 30 January 2012 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Naro Launch vehicle: KSLV 1 Orbit: 292 x 1511 km, inclination: 80.3 ° The 91 kg Science and Technology Satellite (STSAT)-2C carried six instruments: 1. the Laser Retro-reflector Array (LRA) to allow the spacecraft to be tracked with centimeter accuracy by satellite laser ranging (SLR) stations; 2. a Langmuir probe to determine the electron temperature, electron density, and electric potential of plasma; 3. the Space Radiation Effects Monitor (SREM) for the measurements and monitoring of the near-earth space environment; and 4. Reaction Wheel Assembly (RWA), IR Sensor (IRS), and Femto second Laser Oscillator (FSO) to demonstrate new space technologies. 2013 004A (39070) Name: TDRS-11 Country: USA Launch date: 31 January 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Cape Canaveral Launch vehicle: Atlas V-401 Orbit: geostationary at 171 °W TDRS-11 was the first of the next generation of Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) satellites for NASA’s communications relay network. The spacecraft was built by Boeing using the 601HP space platform and was also known as TDRS-K. The 3454 kg satellite was fitted with a steerable, single-access antennas that could simultaneously send and receive high data rate transmissions at S- band and either Ku- or Ka-band frequencies, supporting dual independent two-way communication and making the satellite less susceptible to radio interference. --- Name: Intelsat-27 Int. Agency: Intelsat Launch date: 1 February 2013 Re-entry: n.a. Launch site: Odyssey Launch vehicle: Zenit 3SL Orbit: failed to orbit Communications satellite owned by Intelsat and built by Boeing using the BSS-702P platform. The 6215 kg satellite was fitted with 20 C band and 20 Ku band transponders. In addition carried a military UHF payload of 20 transponders to complement the existing UFO (UHF Follow-On) and future MUOS (Multi-User Objective System) satellites. Immediately after the launch, the launch vehicle veered off course and the first stage was shut down after 25 seconds. The launch vehicle and satellite dropped into the ocean. The satellite was to have been placed in a geostationary orbit at 55.5 oW. The Odyssey platform was located at 0o, 154 oW. 2013 005A (39072) Name: Globalstar FM-78 Country: USA Launch date: 6 February 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Baikonour Launch vehicle: Soyuz 2.1a/Fregat Orbit: 919 x 926 km, inclination: 52.0 ° Communications satellite as described for 2010 054A. The satellite was also known as Globalstar 2-19. 2013 005B (39073) Name: Globalstar FM-87 Country: USA Launch date: 6 February 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Baikonour Launch vehicle: Soyuz 2.1a/Fregat Orbit: 917 x 926 km, inclination: 52.0 ° Communications satellite as described for 2010 054A. The satellite was also known as Globalstar 2-20. 2013 005C (39074) Name: Globalstar FM-93 Country: USA Launch date: 6 February 2013 Re-entry: in orbit Launch site: Baikonour Launch vehicle: Soyuz 2.1a/Fregat Orbit: 916 x 926 km, inclination: 52.0 ° Communications satellite as described for 2010 054A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • China Science and Technology Newsletter No. 14
    CHINA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY NEWSLETTER Department of International Cooperation No.14 Ministry of Science and Technology(MOST), P.R.China July 25 2014 Special Issue: China’s Space Development Achievements and Prospects of China’s Space Development The 64th IAC Held in Beijing Shenzhou 10 Misson Successfully Accomplished Chang’e 3 Achieved Soft Landing on the Moon GF-1 Satellite - The First Satellite of CHEOS Achievements and Prospects of China’s Space Development Mr. Xu Dazhe, Chairman of China Aerospace Science in 1970 marked the start of China entering into space and and Technology Corporation (CASC) delivered a speech exploring the universe. Due to substantial governmental at the 64th International Astronautical Congress (IAC) on support and promotion, China’s space industry developed September 23, 2013, sharing experiences gained in the quite fast and has made world-known achievements. development of China’s space industry with international As the leader in China’s space sector, CASC is colleagues. assigned to develop, manufacture and test launch OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENTS MADE BY vehicles, manned spaceships, various satellites and CHINA’S SPACE INDUSTRY other spacecraft for major national space programs such as China’s Manned Space Program, China’s Lunar China’s space programs have had 57 years of Exploration Program, BeiDou Navigation Satellite development since the 1950s. The successful launch of System, and China’s High-Resolution Earth Observation China’s first artificial satellite Dongfanghong 1 (DFH-1) Monthly-Editorial Board:Building A8 West, Liulinguan Nanli, Haidian District, Beijing 100036, China Contact: Prof.Zhang Ning E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] http://www.caistc.com System.
    [Show full text]
  • ISS Presentation by Sergey Seyvald
    JSC ISS Corporate Presentation 27.04.2010 0 27.04.2010 All rights reserved - Ó JSC ISS - All rights reserved 1 ISS LOCATION ISS 27.04.2010 All rights reserved - Ó JSC ISS - All rights reserved 2 MORE THAN 50 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN SPACE • June 04, 1959 the affiliate of OKB-1 is established in Krasnoyarsk-26 • August 18, 1964 the first launch of in-house developed and manufactured Launcher 11K65 (COSMOS) A.G.Kozlov N.A.Testoyedov and three small-size satellites of COSMOS General General family (38, 39 and 40) Designer Designer and and General General Director Director • August 01, 1977 (1996-2006) (present time) establishment of NPO PM • 1997 NPO PM is renamed to academician M. F. M.F.Reshetnev Reshetnev’s NPO PM General Designer and General Director (1959- • March 03, 2008 1996) establishment of ISS-RESHETNEV COMPANY 27.04.2010 All rights reserved - Ó JSC ISS - All rights reserved 3 COMPANY STRUCTURE INTEGRATED STRUCTURE Joint - Stock Company «Academician M.F. Reshetnev» Information Satellite Systems» General Designer and General Director of JSC «ISS» Shareholders NPP «Geophizika-Cosmos», SIC «Polyus», Tomsk «GONETS», Moscow Moscow Reaction wheels, Battery electronic, Data relay service provider ADCS sensors Power Processing Unit based on LEO system Gonets. NPP «Kvant» ,Moscow «TTS – NPO PM», Zheleznogorsk NPP KP «Kvant», Rostov-na-Donu Solar arrays and batteries. EEE-parts screening and tests ADCS optical sensors «NPO PM – MKB», Zheleznogorsk SPS, Omsk «Sibpromproekt», Zheleznogorsk R&D in space and SADA, ADPM, control units Design and construction industrial facilities. space application on the ground «NPO PM – Razvitie», Zheleznogorsk Ground antenna systems 27.04.2010 4 COMPANY ORGANISATION General Designer & General Director N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2013
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2013 February 2014 About FAA \ NOTICE ###i# £\£\ ###ii# Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. 1 YEAR AT A GLANCE ..............................................2 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION 2013 YEAR IN REVIEW ........5 7 ORBITAL LAUNCH VEHICLES .....................................21 3 SUBORBITAL REUSABLE VEHICLES ...............................47 33 ON-ORBIT VEHICLES AND PLATFORMS ............................57 LAUNCH SITES .................................................65 COMMERCIAL VENTURES BEYOND EARTH ORBIT ...................79 44 REGULATION AND POLICY .......................................83 3 5 3 53 3 8599: : : ;55: 9 < 5; < 2013 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION FORECASTS ..........89 4 3 4 : ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...............................186 2013 WORLDWIDE ORBITAL LAUNCH EVENTS .....................192 DEFINITIONS ..................................................196 ###iii# £\£\ LIST OF FIGURES COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION YEAR IN REVIEW = =999 =99 = =3> =:9;> LAUNCH SITES = :< 2013 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION FORECASTS =944 =4 =?4;9 =99493 =3 =:5= =< =;=9 =95;@3 =A =;=9 A 3 =994?: =9999 ? =54 =359 =:5 3 =<999= ? =99=5 ?3 =;>>99: =99 ? 3 ==9 ? 3: =3 =>3 =?: =3?: =:? : ###iv# LIST OF TABLES COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION YEAR IN REVIEW 99 : 3< :9=99< <99 ORBITAL LAUNCH VEHICLES 99 99 59595 593 SUBORBITAL REUSABLE VEHICLES 3 :5933 ON-ORBIT VEHICLES
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Lifetime Predictions
    Orbital LIFETIME PREDICTIONS An ASSESSMENT OF model-based BALLISTIC COEFfiCIENT ESTIMATIONS AND ADJUSTMENT FOR TEMPORAL DRAG co- EFfiCIENT VARIATIONS M.R. HaneVEER MSc Thesis Aerospace Engineering Orbital lifetime predictions An assessment of model-based ballistic coecient estimations and adjustment for temporal drag coecient variations by M.R. Haneveer to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Thursday June 1, 2017 at 14:00 PM. Student number: 4077334 Project duration: September 1, 2016 – June 1, 2017 Thesis committee: Dr. ir. E. N. Doornbos, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. ir. E. J. O. Schrama, TU Delft ir. K. J. Cowan MBA TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Summary Objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) experience low levels of drag due to the interaction with the outer layers of Earth’s atmosphere. The atmospheric drag reduces the velocity of the object, resulting in a gradual decrease in altitude. With each decayed kilometer the object enters denser portions of the atmosphere accelerating the orbit decay until eventually the object cannot sustain a stable orbit anymore and either crashes onto Earth’s surface or burns up in its atmosphere. The capability of predicting the time an object stays in orbit, whether that object is space junk or a satellite, allows for an estimate of its orbital lifetime - an estimate satellite op- erators work with to schedule science missions and commercial services, as well as use to prove compliance with international agreements stating no passively controlled object is to orbit in LEO longer than 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • → Space for Europe European Space Agency
    number 153 | February 2013 bulletin → space for europe European Space Agency The European Space Agency was formed out of, and took over the rights and The ESA headquarters are in Paris. obligations of, the two earlier European space organisations – the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO) and the European Launcher Development The major establishments of ESA are: Organisation (ELDO). The Member States are Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands. Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Canada is a Cooperating State. ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany. In the words of its Convention: the purpose of the Agency shall be to provide for ESRIN, Frascati, Italy. and to promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European States in space research and technology and their space applications, with a view ESAC, Madrid, Spain. to their being used for scientific purposes and for operational space applications systems: Chairman of the Council: D. Williams (to Dec 2012) → by elaborating and implementing a long-term European space policy, by recommending space objectives to the Member States, and by concerting the Director General: J.-J. Dordain policies of the Member States with respect to other national and international organisations and institutions; → by elaborating and implementing activities and programmes in the space field; → by coordinating the European space programme and national programmes, and by integrating the latter progressively and as completely as possible into the European space programme, in particular as regards the development of applications satellites; → by elaborating and implementing the industrial policy appropriate to its programme and by recommending a coherent industrial policy to the Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubesat Data Analysis Revision
    371-XXXXX Revision - CubeSat Data Analysis Revision - November 2015 Prepared by: GSFC/Code 371 National Aeronautics and Goddard Space Flight Center Space Administration Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 371-XXXXX Revision - Signature Page Prepared by: ___________________ _____ Mark Kaminskiy Date Reliability Engineer ARES Corporation Accepted by: _______________________ _____ Nasir Kashem Date Reliability Lead NASA/GSFC Code 371 1 371-XXXXX Revision - DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD REV DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE LEVEL APPROVED - Baseline Release 2 371-XXXXX Revision - Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Statement of Work 5 3 Database 5 4 Distributions by Satellite Classes, Users, Mass, and Volume 7 4.1 Distribution by satellite classes 7 4.2 Distribution by satellite users 8 4.3 CubeSat Distribution by mass 8 4.4 CubeSat Distribution by volume 8 5 Annual Number of CubeSats Launched 9 6 Reliability Data Analysis 10 6.1 Introducing “Time to Event” variable 10 6.2 Probability of a Successful Launch 10 6.3 Estimation of Probability of Mission Success after Successful Launch. Kaplan-Meier Nonparametric Estimate and Weibull Distribution. 10 6.3.1 Kaplan-Meier Estimate 10 6.3.2 Weibull Distribution Estimation 11 6.4 Estimation of Probability of mission success after successful launch as a function of time and satellite mass using Weibull Regression 13 6.4.1 Weibull Regression 13 6.4.2 Data used for estimation of the model parameters 13 6.4.3 Comparison of the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the Reliability function and the estimates based on the Weibull regression 16 7 Conclusion 17 8 Acknowledgement 18 9 References 18 10 Appendix 19 Table of Figures Figure 4-1 CubeSats distribution by mass ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review—2013
    MSM DEC 2013 cover SATCOM For Net-Centric Warfare December 2013 MilsatMagazine YEARYEAR ININ REVIEW—2013REVIEW—2013 MilsatMagazineDecember 2013 Publishing Operations Senior Contributors Silvano Payne, Publisher + Writer Mike Antonovich, ATEME Hartley G. Lesser, Editorial Director Bert Sadtler, Boxwood Executive Search Pattie Waldt, Executive Editor Richard Dutchik Jill Durfee, Sales Director, Editorial Assistant Tony Bardo, Hughes Simon Payne, Development Director Chris Forrester, Broadgate Publications Donald McGee, Production Manager Karl Fuchs, iDirect Government Services Dan Makinster, Technical Advisor Bob Gough, Carrick Communications Jos Heyman, TIROS Space Information David Leichner, Gilat Satellite Networks This Issue’s Authors Giles Peeters, Track24 Defence Mark A Baird, Colonel, USAF Ian Canning Hartley Lesser Jose Lujano, III, Corporal, USMC Michael Mantz Rafael Martie, Petty Officer, 1st Class, USN Susan Miller Elliot Holokauahi Pulham John Ratigan Scott Scheimreif Pattie Waldt Amy Walker Published 11 times a year by SatNews Publishers 800 Siesta Way Sonoma, CA 95476 USA Phone: (707) 939-9306 Fax: (707) 838-9235 © 2013 SatNews Publishers We reserve the right to edit all submitted materials to meet our content guidelines, as well as for grammar or to move articles to an alternative issue to accommodate publication space requirements, or Cover and Table of masthead Image... removed due to space restrictions. Submission of content does not Staff Sgt. Shelby Johnson, a squad leader with the 4th Brigade constitute acceptance of said material by SatNews Publishers. Edited Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry), observes the materials may, or may not, be returned to author and/or company area around Forward Operating Base Torkham, Afghanistan, while for review prior to publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Going to Mars
    aMARTE A MARS ROADMAP FOR TRAVEL AND EXPLORATION Final Report International Space University Space Studies Program 2016 © International Space University. All Rights Reserved. The 2016 Space Studies Program of the International Space University (ISU) was hosted by the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, Israel. aMARTE has been selected as the name representing the Mars Team Project. This choice was motivated by the dual meaning the term conveys. aMARTE first stands for A Mars Roadmap for Travel and Exploration, the official label the team has adopted for the project. Alternatively, aMARTE can be interpreted from its Spanish roots "amarte," meaning "to love," or can also be viewed as "a Marte," meaning "going to Mars." This play on words represents the mission and spirit of the team, which is to put together a roadmap including various disciplines for a human mission to Mars and demonstrate a profound commitment to Mars exploration. The aMARTE title logo was developed based on sections of the astrological symbols for Earth and Mars. The blue symbol under the team's name represents Earth, and the orange arrow symbol is reminiscent of the characteristic color of Mars. The arrow also serves as an invitation to go beyond the Earth and explore our neighboring planet. Electronic copies of the Final Report and the Executive Summary can be downloaded from the ISU Library website at http://isulibrary.isunet.edu/ International Space University Strasbourg Central Campus Parc d’Innovation 1 rue Jean-Dominique Cassini 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden France Tel +33 (0)3 88 65 54 30 Fax +33 (0)3 88 65 54 47 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.isunet.edu I.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Variability and Mass Loss in Be Stars I
    A&A 588, A56 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201528026 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics Short-term variability and mass loss in Be stars I. BRITE satellite photometry of η and μ Centauri D. Baade1, Th. Rivinius2, A. Pigulski3,A.C.Carciofi4, Ch. Martayan2,A.F.J.Moffat5,G.A.Wade6,W.W.Weiss7, J. Grunhut1, G. Handler8,R.Kuschnig9,7,A.Mehner2,H.Pablo5,A.Popowicz10,S.Rucinski11, and G. Whittaker11 1 European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere (ESO), Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere (ESO), Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile 3 Astronomical Institute, Wrocław University, Kopernika 11, 51-622 Wrocław, Poland 4 Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1226, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil 5 Département de physique and Centre de Recherche en Astrophysique du Québec (CRAQ), Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada 6 Department of Physics, Royal Military College of Canada, PO Box 17000, Stn Forces, Kingston, Ontario K7K 7B4, Canada 7 Institute of Astronomy, University of Vienna, Universitätsring 1, 1010 Vienna, Austria 8 Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, ul. Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland 9 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z1, Canada 10 Institute of Automatic Control, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland 11 Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3H4, Canada Received 21 December 2015 / Accepted 1 February 2016 ABSTRACT Context.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012 February 2013 About FAA About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2013) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Dear Colleague, 2012 was a very active year for the entire commercial space industry. In addition to all of the dramatic space transportation events, including the first-ever commercial mission flown to and from the International Space Station, the year was also a very busy one from the government’s perspective. It is clear that the level and pace of activity is beginning to increase significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • SGAC-Annual-Report-2014.Pdf
    ANNUAL REPORT SPACE GENERATION ADVISORY COUNCIL 2014 In support of the United Nations Programme on Space Applications A. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Table of Contents 2 In support of the United Nations Programme B. Sponsors and Partners 4 on Space Applications 1. Introduction 10 1.1 About the SGAC 12 14 c/o European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) 1.2 Letter from the Co-chairs 15 Schwarzenbergplatz 6 1.3 Letter from the Executive Director 16 Vienna A-1030 1.4 SGAC output at a glance AUSTRIA 2. SGAC Background 22 2.1 History of the SGAC 24 26 [email protected] 2.2 Leadership and Structure 27 www.spacegeneration.org 2.3 Programme +41 1 718 11 18 30 3. The organisation in 2014 30 32 +43 1 718 11 18 99 3.1 Goal Achievement Review 3.2 SGAC Activity Highlights 36 42 © 2015 Space Generation Advisory Council 3.3 Space Generation Fusion Forum Report 3.4 Space Generation Congress Report 50 3.5 United Nations Report 62 3.6 SGAC Regional Workshops 66 3.7 SGAC Supported Events 68 3.8 Financial Summary 72 Acknowledgements 4. Projects 78 4.1 Project Outcomes and Highlights 80 The SGAC 2014 Annual Report was compiled and 4.2 Space Technologies for Disaster Management Project Group 81 edited by Minoo Rathansabapathy (South Africa/ 4.3 Near Earth Objects Project Group 82 Australia), Andrea Jaime (Spain), Laura Rose (USA) 4.4 Space Law and Policy Project Group 84 and Arno Geens (Belgium) with the assistance of 4.5 Commercial Space Project Group 86 Candice Goodwin (South Africa), Justin Park (USA), 4.6 Space Safety and Sustainability Project Group 88 Nikita Marwaha (United Kingdom), Dario Schor 4.7 Small Satellites Project Group 90 (Argentina/Canada), Leo Teeney (UK) and Abhijeet 4.8 Space Exploration Project Group 92 Kumar (Australia) in editing.
    [Show full text]