DOCSLIB.ORG

Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration and Security Sector Reform

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration and Security Sector Reform Alan Bryden and Vincenza Scherrer (eds) Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration and Security Sector Reform Insights from UN Experience in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of the Congo Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) LIT Alan Bryden and Vincenza Scherrer (eds) Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration and Security Sector Reform LIT (Bibliographic information here) Contents Foreword vii Preface ix Abbreviations xi Part I: Introduction 1 The DDR-SSR Nexus: Concepts and Policies 3 Alan Bryden and Vincenza Scherrer Part II: Case Studies 2 Afghanistan 31 Mark Sedra 3 Burundi 71 Serge Rumin 4 The Central African Republic 115 Boubacar N’Diaye 5 The Democratic Republic of the Congo 143 Vincenza Scherrer Part III: Conclusion 6 The DDR-SSR Nexus: Turning Practical Experience into 181 Good Practice Alan Bryden and Vincenza Scherrer Annex 205 Contributors 211 About DCAF 212 Foreword The United Nations is increasingly called upon to support post-conflict societies in their efforts to end conflict, stabilise, consolidate peace and commence recovery. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) and security sector reform (SSR) processes are critical elements of such efforts. As the authors of this publication observe, the conceptual linkages between DDR and SSR are already recognised widely by Member States, practitioners and other actors. Yet the implementation of mutually supportive DDR and SSR initiatives has often been elusive. DDR is a discrete conceptual and operational process that has been undertaken by the United Nations over the last twenty years in direct support of national partners, while SSR, as recently noted by the Security Council, is a much broader and newer concept. In the words of Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, ‘We have come a long way from simply being ceasefire monitors. Today we are expected to keep, enforce and build peace.’ Both approaches are evolving in a very dynamic manner, and there is a need to establish close inter-linkages between DDR and SSR. To some extent, this reflects the operational nature of DDR – a time-bound and quantifiable process – while SSR aims at transforming institutions of government and even concepts of security. The book is a product of a close working relationship between the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, and it provides a timely and much-needed contribution to enhance our understanding about the topic. I hope it will stimulate further research in this very important emerging area. In a time of global economic challenges, efficiency, adaptability, innovation and vision are needed in all areas of post-conflict management. Unity of purpose and coherence are also vital. Actors must think beyond organisational boundaries and play to different strengths of peace operations, special political missions or UN agencies, funds and programmes. Synergy and coherence, together with delivering as one, are essential. Viewed from this perspective, DDR and SSR offer opportunities for designing mutually reinforcing early peacebuilding interventions that increase our capacity to achieve more with less. The book provides an impressive panorama of different contexts in which DDR and SSR intersect. The case studies on Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of the Congo viii highlight the politically charged and inter-linked nature of DDR and SSR. While it should also be noted that the new concept of SSR will continue to evolve, these examples provide useful historical and practical references. We believe that the lessons offered in this publication will prove valuable for the many tasks lying ahead for the international community. They also remind us that no two conflicts are the same. It is therefore safe to say that the success of the international community’s engagement in conflict-torn countries will continue to rest on the ability to contextualise, adapt and re- evaluate current approaches. Dmitry Titov Assistant Secretary-General for Rule of Law and Security Institutions Department of Peacekeeping Operations United Nations Preface The UN has a long track record in the field of disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR). Although also involved in supporting security sector reform (SSR) in member states over a number of years, translating these efforts into a common UN approach to SSR policy and practice is a more recent endeavour. The distinct trajectories of UN engagement in DDR and SSR underline that the activities often involve different objectives, timelines and stakeholders. Yet at the same time, both share a common goal of helping states emerging from conflict move towards recovery and longer term development. As a result, the need to exploit positive synergies but also to ‘do no harm’ in designing and implementing UN support for DDR and SSR has become increasingly evident. In order to understand the nexus between DDR and SSR and its implications for UN policy and practice, a requirement was identified by the UN Inter-Agency Working Group on DDR (IAWG-DDR) for additional guidance on DDR and SSR. Under the leadership of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Department for Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), DCAF was engaged to develop a new module for the UN Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards (IDDRS) on this topic. The resulting IDDRS Module 6.10 on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration and Security Sector Reform was officially launched at an IAWG-DDR Principals meeting on 14 December 2009.1 This volume reflects the key insights developed through this project and, in particular, showcases the country case studies developed as part of this work. We hope that this volume provides a useful point of reference for academics, policy makers and practitioners involved in the challenging fields of DDR and SSR. It is important to acknowledge that the four cases studies on Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of the Congo reflect the prevailing political and security situation at their time of writing. Much has certainly evolved since the field research was undertaken between September 2008 and January 2009. What has not changed is the need for international engagements in DDR, SSR and related fields to be contextually-grounded. Programmes must be responsive to the needs and interests of different national actors. Without understanding the dynamic political processes that shape the origins, parameters and outcomes 1 The module is available at: www.unddr.org x of both processes, DDR and SSR may address security deficits, but will be unfit to support sustainable transitions towards national recovery and development. The successful completion of the DDR-SSR project would not have been possible without the engagement of a number of people. The initial concept for the IDDRS module was developed by Kelvin Ong, now with the UN Department for Political Affairs. The process was guided on the UN side by Ayaka Suzuki and Simon Yazgi from the DPKO DDR Unit as well as Sophie da Camara, Luc Lafrenière and Dean Piedmont from UNDP’s Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery. Valuable input was received from members of the IAWG-DDR and the Inter-Agency SSR Task Force as well as from many representatives of UN field missions and country offices. Conceptualization and drafting was supported by an advisory board of independent experts which included Jeremy Brickhill, Michael Brzoska, Mark Downes, Mark Knight, Robert Muggah and Edward Rees. Finally, the case study authors Boubacar N’Diaye, Serge Rumin, Vincenza Scherrer and Mark Sedra gave unsparingly of their time and knowledge to deliver against a complex and demanding set of requirements. The editors would like to thank sincerely all those who contributed to this process. The views expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not in any way reflect the views of either the institutions or their representatives involved in this process. The Editors Geneva, March 2012 Abbreviations AMF Afghan Military Force AMIB African Union Mission in Burundi ANA Afghan National Army ANBP Afghan New Beginnings Programme ANP Afghan National Police APPM Armed Political Parties and Movements AU African Union BINUB Bureau Intégré des Nations Unies au Burundi, UN Integrated Office in Burundi BONUCA Bureau politique d’observation des Nations Unies en Centrafrique, United Nations Peace-building Office in the Central African Republic CAR Central African Republic CC Cellule de concertation, consultation unit CEMAC Communauté Économique et Monétaire de l'Afrique Centrale, Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa CFA franc African Financial Community franc CivPol Civilian police CONADER Commission Nationale de la Démobilization et Réinsertion, National Commision for Demobilization and Reintegration, DRC CNDD/FDD Conseil National pour la Défense et la Démocratie/Forces pour la Défense de la Démocratie, National Council for Defence and Democracy / Forces for the Defence of Democracy, Burundi CNDDR Commission Nationale de Désarmement, Démobilization, et Réinsertion, National Commission for Disarmamant, Demobilization and Reintegration, CAR CNDP Congrès national pour la défense du peuple, National Congress for the Defence of the People, DRC CSTC-A Combined Security Transition Command Afghanistan DAC Development Assistance Committee (of the OECD) DCR Disarmament and community
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colonial Appeasement
    Colonial Appeasement coming to power in 1933, even though the Nazi leader’s territorial ambitions focused (1935–38) on Eastern Europe, as indicated in his infa- PAUL W. DOERR mous memoir Mein Kampf.Afewsenior Acadia University, Canada Nazis also hoped for a colonial foothold in Africa, but the early years of Hitler’s regime were taken up with other, more urgent Colonial appeasement is a largely forgotten matters. aspectofBritishappeasement.Duringthe British officials and policy-makers had, years from 1935 to 1938 the British govern- throughout the 1920s, strongly rejected any ment gave serious attention to the possibility suggestion of returning colonies to Germany. of granting Germany colonial possessions But the deteriorating world economic situa- in Africa as part of a “general settlement” tion after 1929, combined with the growing with the Nazi regime. Various schemes for threat to the peace from Hitler’s Germany, transferring African territories to German forced the British to rethink their position. jurisdiction were considered, but serious Gradually the idea began to emerge that per- obstacles arose and, with the exception of haps colonies could be returned to Germany one formal proposal from the British in early as part of a much larger general settlement of 1938, talks with the Germans on the subject the situation in Europe. never moved beyond vague generalities. On March 7, 1936, Hitler sent German Prior to the First World War, Germany troops into the demilitarized zone of Ger- held four territories in Africa, namely Ger- many. He then issued a series of demands, man East Africa, German South-West Africa, oneofwhichwasacallforequalityofcolonial Kamerun, and Togoland.
    [Show full text]
  • Philipp Fluri and Eden Cole ∗
    DCAF’s Activities in Support of Effective and Democratically Transparent Defense Planning Philipp Fluri and Eden Cole ∗ The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) focuses on democratic oversight of and guidance for the defense and security sector. Increasing transparency and efficiency in defense planning and spending thus do not generally fall under DCAF’s purview in the strict sense, and are addressed only within the larger context of defense institution building. The defense budgetary process in a given state—from its formulation by the execu- tive, its enactment into law by the legislature, its implementation, and ultimately its au- diting and evaluation—is circumscribed by a number of parameters, and requires that the different actors have competencies in dealing with democratic processes and multi- ple constituencies that are never called upon under authoritarian systems. On the con- trary, the legislature in authoritarian states is often content to “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s”—that is, to leave the responsibility for things military with the military and/or the security services, as such matters “cannot be understood by lay persons anyway.” In a similar vein, within their ministry itself the defense planners may decide to leave their task essentially in the hands of the “commissars” of the presidential appa- ratus, as this is the place where power is concentrated and monopolized in such sys- tems. As an important consequence, defense planning in transitional states is fraught with problems that are all too familiar: an executive which has first to learn about transparent planning cycles and gain self-confidence in the implementation thereof; a legislative power which needs to learn about guidance and oversight mechanisms; and national media and institutions of civil society which need to change their expectations from commenting on the successes of authoritarian leadership to the assumption of the responsibility for public oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 (15. Februar 2017)
    2017/03 ISSN 1661-8211 | 117. Jahrgang | 15. Februar 2017 Redaktion und Herausgeberin: Schweizerische Nationalbibliothek NB, Hallwylstrasse 15, CH-3003 Bern Erscheinungsweise: halbmonatlich, am 15. und 30. jeden Monats Hinweise unter: http://ead.nb.admin.ch/web/sb-pdf/ ISSN 1661-8211 © Schweizerische Nationalbibliothek NB, CH-3003 Bern. Alle Rechte vorbehalten Inhaltsverzeichnis - Table des matières - Sommario - Cuntegn - Table of contents Inhaltsverzeichnis - Table des matières - 220 Bibel / Bible / Bibbia / Bibla / Bible....................................... 6 Sommario - Cuntegn - Table of contents 230 Christentum, christliche Theologie / Christianisme, théologie chrétienne / Cristianesimo, teologia cristiana / Cristianissem, teologia cristiana / Christianity and Christian theology..................6 000 Allgemeine Werke, Informatik, Informationswissenschaft / Informatique, information, 290 Andere Religionen / Autres religions / Altre religioni / Autras ouvrages de référence / Informatica, scienza religiuns / Other religions............................................................... 9 dell'informazione, generalità / Informatica, infurmaziun e referenzas generalas / Computers, information and general reference........................................................................................ 1 300 Sozialwissenschaften / Sciences sociales / Scienze sociali / Scienzas socialas / Social sciences.......................... 10 000 Allgemeine Werke, Wissen, Systeme / Généralités, savoir, systèmes / Generalità, sapere, sistemi / Generalitads,
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Evaluation of European Commission Support to Justice and Security System Reform
    Thematic Evaluation of European Commission Support to Justice and Security System Reform Final Report Volume I – Main Report November 2011 Evaluation for the European Commission Framework contract for Multi-country thematic and regional/country-level strategy European Group for evaluation studies and synthesis in the area of external co- Evaluation EEIG Germany operation LOT 2: Multi-country evaluation studies on social/human development issues of EC external co-operation PARTICIP GmbH Germany Ref.: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi Request for Service: 2010/234349 Aide à la Décision Economique Belgium Thhematic Evaluation of European Commission Support to Justice and Security Italy System Reform Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik Germany European Centre for Development Policy Management Final Report Belgium Volume I – Main Report Overseas Development Institute, United Kingdom South Research November 2011 Belgium A consortium of EGEVAL II (Particip & ADE) –DRN-DIE– ECDPM-ODI c/o Particip GmbH, leading Thhis evaluation was carried out by company: Headquarters Merzhauser Str. 183 D - 79100 Freiburg / Germany Phone: +49-761-79074-0 Fax: +49-761-79074-90 [email protected] The evaluation has been managed by the Joint Evaluation Unit in DG DEVCO. The author accepts sole responsibility for this report, drawn up on behalf of the Commission of the European Union. The report does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission. Thematic Evaluation of the European Commission Support to Justice and Security System Reform ADE - EGEVAL II Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 OVERALL OBJECTIVE, MANDATE AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION .......................... 1 1.2 KEY PHASES OF THE EVALUATION .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence
    Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence A Compendium of Best Practices The publication of this Compendium is supported by NATO and the Swiss Ministry of Defence Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence: A Compendium of Best Practices Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) www.dcaf.ch The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces is one of the world’s leading institutions in the areas of security sector reform (SSR) and security sector governance (SSG). DCAF provides in-country advisory support and practical assistance programmes, develops and promotes appropriate democratic norms at the international and national levels, advocates good practices and makes policy recommendations to ensure effective democratic governance of the security sector. DCAF’s partners include governments, parliaments, civil society, international organisations and the range of security sector actors such as police, judiciary, intelligence agencies, border security services and the military. 2010 Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence: A Compendium of Best Practices Geneva, 2010 The following persons participated in the production of the Compendium of Best Practices in Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence Editorial Board Philipp Fluri (DCAF), Adrian Kendry (NATO), Simon Lunn (DCAF), Mark Pyman (TI-UK) Editor and Lead Author: Todor Tagarev (Bulgaria) Contributors Jean-Jacques de Dardel (Switzerland) – Foreword, Francois Melese (US) – Chapters 2 and 9, Adrian Kendry and Susan Pond (NATO) – Chapter 3, James Greene (US) – Chap- ters 5, 16 and 22, Mark Pyman (UK) – Chapter 8, Aditya Batara (Indonesia) – Chapter 11, George Lucas (US) – Chapter 12, Alxandre Kukhianidze, Tamuna Karosanidze, Nina Khatiskatsi and Alexander Scrivener (Georgia) – Chapter 13, Anne-Christine Wegener and Mark Pyman (TI-UK) – Chapter 14, Leonid Polyakov (Ukraine) and James Greene (US) – Chapter 17, Wim F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of EU Security Sector Assistance: Learning from Experience
    ecdpm’s Making policies work DISCUSSION PAPER No. 271 The future of EU security sector assistance: learning from experience By Matthias Deneckere, Ashley Neat and Volker Hauck May 2020 This paper reflects on the future of the EU’s role in working with foreign security actors. It does so in the context of debates on how to better equip EU external action to deal with conflict and instability, including through a European Peace Facility, while also operationalising the linkages between security and development. Our analysis looks at the support to security sector reform (SSR) as an instrument that resides at this nexus and faces various challenges at the strategic and operational level. Such challenges include balancing short- and long-term objectives, reconciling interests and values, ensuring context sensitivity and overcoming bureaucratic and cultural divisions between policy communities. Drawing on practices from the EU and three member states (Germany, France and the Netherlands) in the domain of security sector reform, the paper provides insights on how such challenges can be practically dealt with. First, it argues that a comprehensive SSR policy not only requires a spelled-out strategy, but also a continued dialogue process between security, peace and development communities at the strategic and policy level, involving experts and civil society actors. Second, SSR needs to build on localised approaches that are informed by political context analysis and build on existing reform processes or windows of opportunity to foster change through targeted interventions. Third, cooperation with security actors should consider the risks in doing harm or negatively impacting conflict dynamics. Practical tools exist to manage risks, but negative effects can never be completely controlled.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Peace Operations
    OROLSI is comprised of five components: “UN Peacekeeping deploys to some of the most complex OFFICE OF RULE OF LAW & SECURITY INSTITUTIONS and difficult places, protecting some of the world’s most United Nations Police Division (PD) vulnerable. We are working in partnership with Member States to implement the Secretary-General’s Action for Where requested and mandated, United Nations Police (UNPOL) supports Member States to realize effective, efficient, representative, responsive and accountable police services that Peacekeeping initiative to strengthen peacekeeping, including serve and protect the population. UNPOL build and support police capacity to prevent and to improve how we protect civilians, which is at the heart of detect crime, protect life and property and maintain public order and safety in adherence our work. For hundreds of millions, peacekeeping is the last to the rule of law and international human rights norms. The United Nations Police Division best hope and it needs all our support.” supports UNPOL by selecting, recruiting, deploying and rotating personnel in UN peace operations; developing policy and guidance; providing strategic and operational support, Jean-Pierre Lacroix Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations including through the Standing Police Capacity; and facilitating assessments and evaluations. Justice and Corrections Service (JCS) Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) OROLSI colleagues are at the forefront of efforts to enhance The Justice and Corrections Service serves as a center of expertise on justice and the performance and accountability of peacekeepers, includ- corrections areas and supports the work of justice and corrections components in OROLSI is committed to ing by conducting trainings and assessments of Formed Police United Nations peace operations and other UN entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Disarmament a Basic Guide
    Disarmament A Basic Guide by Melissa Gillis Third Edition United Nations, New York, 2012 Note THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS has published the Ba- sic Guide pursuant to the purposes of the United Nations Disarmament Informa- tion Programme. The mandate of the Programme is to inform, educate and gener- ate public understanding of the importance of multilateral action, and support for it, in the field of arms limitation and disarmament. For more information, contact: Information and Outreach Branch United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs United Nations New York, NY 10017 Telephone: 212.963.3022 Email: [email protected] Website: www.un.org/disarmament THE FIRST EDITION of the Guide was originally written by Bhaskar Menon and pub- lished in 2001 in collaboration with the Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Committee on Disarmament, Peace and Security. The second edition was authored and edited by Melissa Gillis, the editor of Disarmament Times, and was published in 2009. Ms. Gillis edited this third edition and provided updated text where ap- propriate. The Guide is intended for the general reader, but may also be useful for the disarmament educator or trainer. COVER DESIGN based on the United Nations poster entitled “The United Nations for a Better World”, designed by Ricardo Ernesto Jaime de Freitas. THE VIEWS expressed are those of the author/editor and do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations. MATERIAL appearing in the Guide may be reprinted without permission, provided that credit is given to the author/editor and to the United Nations. Since 1972, the NGO COMMITTEE ON DISARMAMENT, PEACE AND SECURITY has provided services to citizens’ groups concerned with the peace and disarmament activities of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Submarine and the Washington Conference Of
    477 THE SUBMARINE AND THE WASHINGTON CONFERENCE OF 1921 Lawrence H. Douglas Following the First World War, the tation of this group, simply stated, was tide of public opinion was overwhelm­ that second best in naval strength meant ingly against the submarine as a weapon last. A policy of naval superiority was of war. The excesses of the German necessary, they felt, for "history consis­ U-boat had stunned the sensibilities of tently shows that war between no two the world but had, nonetheless, pre­ peoples or nations can be unthink­ sented new ideas and possibilities of this able.,,1 A second group, the Naval weapon to the various naval powers of Advisory Committee (Admirals Pratt the time. The momentum of these new and Coontz and Assistant Secretary of ideas proved so strong that by the the Navy Theodore Roosevelt, Jr.) also opening of the first major international submitted recommendations concerning disarmament conference of the 20th the limitation of naval armaments. century, practical uses of the submarine From the outset their deliberations were had all but smothered the moral indig­ guided by a concern that had become nation of 1918. more and more apparent-the threat Several months prior to the opening posed to the security and interests of of the conference, the General Board of this country by Japan. This concern was the American Navy was given the task evidenced in an attempt to gain basic of developing guidelines and recommen­ understandings with Britain. dations to be used by the State Depart­ The submarine received its share of ment in determining the American attention in the deliberations of these proposals to be presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Demilitarization and Conversion
    BIONN NTERNATIONAL C ENTER FOR C ONVERSION. I NTERNATIONALES K ONVERSIONSZENTRUM B ONN paper1 Demilitarization and Conversion World Social Summit Copenhagen, March 1995 Michael Brzoska, Kees Kingma, Herbert Wulf The authors are members of the staff of the Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC). Dr. Michael Brzoska is head of the research department, Kees Kingma is project leader of demobilization and demilitarization projects, Dr. Herbert Wulf is director of BICC. BICC. AN DER ELISABETHKIRCHE 25 53113. BONN GERMANY. PHONE +49-228-9 11 96-0. FAX +49-228-24 12 15 Background Paper for the Panel Demilitarization and Conversion Conversion of Military Structures—A Challenge for the International Scientific Community and an Opportunity for Global Security and Social Development at the World Social Summit Copenhagen, 8 March 1995 Bonn International Center for Conversion Michael Brzoska, Kees Kingma and Herbert Wulf1 1The authors are all members of staff at the Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC). Dr. Michael Brzoska is head of the research department, Kees Kingma is project leader of demobilization and demilitarization projects, Dr. Herbert Wulf is the director of BICC. Demilitarization and Conversion Conversion of Military Structures - A Challenge for the International Scientific Community and an Opportunity for Global Security and Social Development prepared for the World Social Summit, Copenhagen, March 1995 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Elements of a comprehensive concept of conversion 3. Benefits and costs of conversion 4. Redistributing resources through conversion 5. Reorientation of science for social development 6. Security aspects of conversion 7. Summary: Military conversion for social development References Appendix tables - 2 - I.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Oversight of Security and Intelligence Agencies in the European Union
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT OF SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION STUDY Abstract This study evaluates the oversight of national security and intelligence agencies by parliaments and specialised non-parliamentary oversight bodies, with a view to identifying good practices that can inform the European Parliament’s approach to strengthening the oversight of Europol, Eurojust, Frontex and, to a lesser extent, Sitcen. The study puts forward a series of detailed recommendations (including in the field of access to classified information) that are formulated on the basis of in- depth assessments of: (1) the current functions and powers of these four bodies; (2) existing arrangements for the oversight of these bodies by the European Parliament, the Joint Supervisory Bodies and national parliaments; and (3) the legal and institutional frameworks for parliamentary and specialised oversight of security and intelligence agencies in EU Member States and other major democracies. PE 453.207 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. AUTHORS Aidan WILLS, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) Mathias VERMEULEN, European University Institute (EUI) Hans BORN, Project Leader, DCAF Martin SCHEININ, Project Leader, EUI Micha WIEBUSCH, Research Assistant, DCAF Ashley THORNTON, Language Consultant RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Andreas HARTMANN Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Bruxelles E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in June 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Integration in Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG)
    Gender Integration in Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG) PROGRAMMING TOOLKIT JUNE 2016 Acknowledgements External consultant Alyson Kozma conducted the initial research and was the lead author of this toolkit. USAID’s Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG Center), specifically its Gender Working Group, comprised of members from the DRG Center’s leadership team and each of its nine divisions, supported the production of this toolkit. The following people contributed comments during an internal review of the publication: Adam Bushey (DRG), Colin Buckley (DRG), Cathy Cozzarelli (PPL), Julie Denham (DRG), Claire Ehmann (DRG), Mark Goldenbaum (DRG), Martin Hayes (DRG), Ajit Joshi (DRG), Bruce Kay (DRG), Mike Keshishian (DRG), Summer Lopez (DRG), Sharon Rogers (DRG), Lauren Seyfried (DRG), Andrew Solomon (DRG), Tamara Shaya (CMM), and Madeline Williams (DRG). The toolkit also draws on inputs from the DRG Cadre, including Foreign Service Officers and Foreign Service Nationals across missions, collected via electronic survey in 2013. This survey was designed to capture the DRG sub-sectoral priorities identified by the DRG Cadre as they relate to program cycle gender integration and program design. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. C2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Glossary of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]