Private Actors and Security Governance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Private Actors and Security Governance Private Actors and Security Governance Alan Bryden, and Marina Caparini (editors.) © 2006, LIT & DCAF Contents List of Graphs and Tables ix Preface xi Abbreviations xiii Part I: Introduction 1 Approaching the Privatisation of Security from 3 a Security Governance Perspective Alan Bryden Part II: The International Policy Context 2 Fragile Statehood, Armed Non-State Actors 23 and Security Governance Ulrich Schneckener 3 Private Sector, Public Security 41 Alyson Bailes 4 Insurgencies, Security Governance and 65 the International Community Albrecht Schnabel. 5 Reconstructing the Public Monopoly 87 of Legitimate Force Herbert Wulf Part III: Regional and National Perspectives 6 Bulgaria's Private Security Industry 109 Philip Gounev 7 The Commercialisation of Post-Soviet Private Security 129 Duncan Hiscock 8 Challenges of Security Privatisation in Iraq 149 David Isenberg 9 Implementing South Africa’s Regulation of 167 Foreign Military Assistance Act Raenette Taljaard Part IV: Challenges of Regulation 10 Regulating Military and Security Services 189 in the European Union Elke Krahmann 11 The United Nations and the Dilemma 213 of Outsourcing Peacekeeping Operations Victor-Yves Ghebali 12 Assessing the Relationship between Humanitarian 231 Actors and Private Security Companies Christopher Spearin 13 Private Security Actors, Donors and SSR 247 Peter Wilson Part V: Conclusion 14 Applying a Security Governance Perspective to 263 the Privatisation of Security Marina Caparini Annex International Organisations and the Governance of 285 Private Security Jonas Hagmann and Moncef Kartas List of Contributors 305 About DCAF 307 Index 309 List of Graphs and Tables Table 2.1 Types of Armed Non-state Actors 30 Table 5.1 Arguments for and against Deployment of PMCs 95 Table 5.2 Establishing the Multi-level Monopoly of Force 100 Graph 6.1 Racketeering and Violence In Bulgaria 113 Graph 6.2 Have you been asked money for protection? 116 Graph 6.3 What were the reasons you hired a PSC? 121 Table 10.1 Military Service Export Controls in the EU 202 Preface The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international com- munity in promoting good governance and reform of the security sector. Beyond a range of publications linked to its research and operational pro- grammes, each year DCAF dedicates an entire volume to a selected topic of particular relevance to our ongoing research and analytical work. The first volume was published in 2003 under the title Challenges of Security Sector Governance; the second one was published in 2004 under the title Reform and Reconstruction of the Security Sector; and the third volume in the series, published in 2005 was devoted to Security Governance in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. The fourth edition of the series is dedicated to Private Actors and Se- curity Governance. Security privatisation, from the perspective of both the top–down decision to outsource military- and security-related tasks to pri- vate firms, and the bottom–up activities of armed non-state actors such as rebel opposition groups, insurgents, militias and warlord factions, challenge the state’s authority and monopoly of legitimate force. Common to this phe- nomenon in all its dimensions is that it has significant implications for effec- tive and democratically accountable security governance and is directly linked to opportunities for security sector reform (SSR) across the range of different reform contexts. This volume begins by attempting to situate secu- rity privatisation within a broader framework that takes into account differ- ent understandings of the role of the state in international relations, concepts such as globalisation, transnationalisation as well as the consequences of 11 September 2001 (9/11). From a security governance perspective, different national cases are then assessed. Finally, different forms of regulation and control are considered with respect to the various faces of security privatisa- tion. It would not have been possible to successfully complete this volume, particularly in light of the tight timescales involved, without the invaluable support of a number of people. In particular, we would like to thank Jonas Hagmann and Moncef Kartas for research and editing contributions, in par- ticular in authoring the very rich Annex to this volume. Oliver Wates and Jason Powers respectively provided excellent copy- and technical editing assistance, and Tim Donais provided incisive comments and inputs on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Veit D. Hopf of LIT Verlag again guided us xii through the publication process with much patience and encouragement. Our thanks go in particular to the contributors, who agreed to write under signifi- cant time pressure, and our colleague Heiner Hänggi at DCAF who provided valuable comments on different parts of the publication. The topics touched upon in this volume were discussed at a workshop as a part of the bi-annual DCAF International Advisory Board meeting where DCAF IAB members provided a number of important comments. The editors would also like to thank the DCAF IAB members for their very use- ful inputs. The Editors Geneva, September 2006 Abbreviations ACHPR African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights ANSA Armed non-state actors ASEAN the Association of Southeast Asian Nations AU African Union BAPSC British Association of Private Security Companies CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CICAD Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CIFTA Inter-American Convention against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and other Related Materials CIMIC Civil-Military Cooperation CJTF Iraq and Combined Joint Task Force COARM Conventional Arms Exports Working Group CoESS Confederation of European Security Services CPA Coalition Provisional Authority CSecR Corporate Security Responsibility CSR Corporate Social Responsibility CTC Counter Terrorism Committee DCAF Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces DDRR Disarmament, Demobilisation, Reintegration and Rehabilitation DFID United Kingdom’s Department for International Development DSL Defence Systems Limited DSO State Protection Service (derzhavna sluzhba okhorony ) ECHO European Commission’s Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid ECOSOC United Nations Economic and Social Council ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EU European Union FARC Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia GAO U.S. Government Accountability Office GCC Gulf Cooperation Council HRL International human rights law xiv IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAMB International Advisory and Monitoring Board ICC International Criminal Court ICISS International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty’s ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IF-SSR Implementation framework for SSR IHL International Humanitarian Law IMO International Maritime Organization, IPOA International Peace Operations Association KLA Kosovo Liberation Army MEJA Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act MIA Ministry of Internal Affairs MONUC United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo MPRI Military Professional Resources Incorporated MTCR the Missile Technology Control Regime NAPAPPA National Association of the Persons and Association Performing Protective Activity NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organsiation NCACC National Conventional Arms Control Committee NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NPA National Prosecuting Authority OAG Office of the Auditor General in Canada OAS Organisation of American States OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OIC Organisation of the Islamic Conference OSCE Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe PMC Private Military Company PoA Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat, and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons, in All Its Aspects PPD Police Protection Department PPP Public–private partnership PSC Private Security Company RDA Relief and Development Agency xv RFMA South African Regulation of Foreign Military Assistance Act SAPS South African Police Service SADC Southern African Development Community SBU Ukrainian Security Service (sluzhba bezpeky Ukrayiny) SICIRI Supreme Council of Islamic Revolution In Iraq SSR Security Sector Reform UFNSSS Ukrainian Federation of Non-State Security Services UN United Nations UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICRI United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute UNITA União Nacional para a Independência Total de Angola UNITAF Unified Task Force WFP World Food Programme WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction PART I INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 Approaching the Privatisation of Security from a Security Governance Perspective Alan Bryden Introduction This volume considers the phenomenon of security privatisation from the perspective of both the top-down decision to outsource military- and secu- rity-related tasks to private firms, and the bottom-up activities of armed non- state actors such as rebel opposition groups, insurgents, militias and warlord factions that challenge the state’s authority. Both ‘bottom-up’ locally- generated armed actors and ‘top-down’ private security and military compa- nies (PSCs/PMCs), have significant implications for effective and democ- ratically accountable security sector governance as both concern the dimin- ished state monopoly of the use of legitimate
Recommended publications
  • D-PHYS Master of Science – ETH Zurich and Ecole Polytechnique Paris Specialization in High Energy Physics
    D-PHYS Master of Science – ETH Zurich and Ecole Polytechnique Paris Specialization in High Energy Physics Study Guide Department of Physics Content Introduction 4 1 Master program 5 2 Performance Assessment 10 3 Program requirements, application and admission 18 4 Useful information about ETH Zurich and EP Paris 21 5 Appendix 26 Imprint Editorial staff Günther Dissertori and Matthias Gaberdiel Photograph Heidi Hostettler Graphic Design Amanda Eisenhut 3 Introduction 1 Master program ETH Zurich and Ecole Polytechnique (EP) Paris offer a Joint Master The aim of this Master specialization is to 1.1 Tutor System offer a coherent theoretical and experi­ program with specialization in High Energy Physics (HEP). High Energy Each student in the Master program in mental education in High Energy Physics, Physics studies the elementary constituents of matter and the associated High Energy Physics will be allocated a covering a wide spectrum of areas and ap­ fundamental forces. The tools for these studies are experiments at tutor through the academic board. The plications: particle physics, astroparticle tutor gives academic advice and helps with particle accelerators operating at very high energies or at very high physics, the Standard Model of the elec­ the coordination of the program. In parti­ beam intensities, as well as ultra-sensitive large-mass detectors. These troweak interactions and its supersym­ cular, the tutor advises the student in the experimental setups give sensitivity to the laws of physics at very short metric extensions, strong interactions and choice of courses for the second year, given distances. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), launched in September 2008 quantum chromodynamics, nuclear phys­ the selection of courses taken in the first ics, general relativity and quantum gravity at CERN, is the most spectacular realization of such a tool to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Aftermath of the Anti-Terrorism Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006
    Scrutiny by the Metropolitan Police Authority of communication and media at the Metropolitan Police Service with particular reference to the handling of media and communications during the Forest Gate incident of June 2006 Aftermath of the Anti-Terrorism Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006 Submission of Newham Monitoring Project 27 September 2006 Aftermath of the Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006 1. Terms of Reference 1.1. On Friday 2 June, 2006 police carried out raids on 46 and 48 Lansdown Road, Forest Gate, London. In the weeks following these raids the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) amended its existing scrutiny programme of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) for 2006/7 to include the media and communications strategy of the MPS. 1.2. The stated objectives of this amendment to the MPA’s scrutiny programme is to : a) Assess the extent to which the MPS has the strategies, policies, protocols and processes in place to ensure efficient and effective communication, media and reputation management, particularly in the context of the 24 hour news environment. b) Undertake a detailed analysis of the handling of the media and communication during the Forest Gate incident in June 2006. c) Assess how effectively the MPS engages internally to manage communication to the media, Londoners and stakeholders, particularly during sensitive operations. d) Understand the culture of the MPS towards communication and media management and the impact this has on the delivery of an effective service. e) Evaluate the use of resources available to the MPS to deliver this key function, including understanding the division of resources and lines of accountability between central and local directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Research, Art and Impact Assessment
    Research, Art and Impact Assessment Aalto University Aalto University Research, Art and Impact Assessment RAI 2018 Report Ella Bingham, Krisztina Cziner, Marjo Kettunen and Tuija Pulkkinen (ed.) Publisher: Aalto University Layout: Matti Ahlgren and Päivi Kekäläinen Copyediting: Heidi Henrickson Cover photo and photos on pages 4, 22, 178: Unto Rautio/Aalto University Print: Unigrafia 2019 Available online at https://www.aalto.fi/research-art/research-assessments ISBN 978-952-60-3762-2 1 2 Contents President's greetings 5 RAI 2018 – Why? 7 Executive Summary 8 Aalto University's Mission and Strategic Development Actions 11 Organization and Implementation of the Assessment 15 Assessment Fields and Units of Assessment 18 Assessment Panels, Report and Criteria 19 Utilisation of the Assessment Results 21 Main findings and recommendations 23 Field 1: Arts, Design and Architecture 30 Field 2: Business and Economics 48 Field 3a: Chemical engineering and physics 66 Field 3b: Engineering 82 Field 4: ICT and Mathematics 96 Field 5: Energy 114 Field 6: Health and Wellbeing 130 Field 7: Living environments 144 Field 8: Innovation Ecosystem 156 Elements of Assessment 180 Panels 182 Assessment organisation 184 3 4 President's greetings Nearly 10 years since founding – 42 international specialists assessed the development of Aalto University In 2010, Helsinki University of Technology, the University of Art and Design, and the Helsinki School of Economics merged to form Aalto University, which was given a special national task: to strengthen the innovative capacity of Finland through first-class research, artistic activities, and education. The aim was to create a new kind of research university that combines high societal relevance with uncompromising scientific rigor and groundbreaking art.
    [Show full text]
  • WUDR Biology
    www.cicerobook.com Biology 2021 TOP-500 Double RankPro 2021 represents universities in groups according to the average value of their ranks in the TOP 500 of university rankings published in a 2020 World University Country Number of universities Rank by countries 1-10 California Institute of Technology Caltech USA 1-10 Harvard University USA Australia 16 1-10 Imperial College London United Kingdom Austria 2 1-10 Massachusetts Institute of Technology USA Belgium 7 1-10 Stanford University USA Brazil 1 1-10 University College London United Kingdom Canada 12 1-10 University of California, Berkeley USA China 14 1-10 University of Cambridge United Kingdom Czech Republic 1 1-10 University of Oxford United Kingdom Denmark 4 1-10 Yale University USA Estonia 1 11-20 Columbia University USA Finland 4 11-20 Cornell University USA France 9 11-20 ETH Zürich-Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich Switzerland Germany 26 11-20 Johns Hopkins University USA Greece 1 11-20 Princeton University USA Hong Kong 3 11-20 University of California, Los Angeles USA Ireland 4 11-20 University of California, San Diego USA Israel 4 11-20 University of Pennsylvania USA Italy 11 11-20 University of Toronto Canada Japan 6 11-20 University of Washington USA Netherlands 9 21-30 Duke University USA New Zealand 2 21-30 Karolinska Institutet Sweden Norway 3 21-30 Kyoto University Japan Portugal 2 21-30 Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich Germany Rep.Korea 5 21-30 National University of Singapore Singapore Saudi Arabia 2 21-30 New York University USA Singapore 2 21-30
    [Show full text]
  • Philipp Fluri and Eden Cole ∗
    DCAF’s Activities in Support of Effective and Democratically Transparent Defense Planning Philipp Fluri and Eden Cole ∗ The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) focuses on democratic oversight of and guidance for the defense and security sector. Increasing transparency and efficiency in defense planning and spending thus do not generally fall under DCAF’s purview in the strict sense, and are addressed only within the larger context of defense institution building. The defense budgetary process in a given state—from its formulation by the execu- tive, its enactment into law by the legislature, its implementation, and ultimately its au- diting and evaluation—is circumscribed by a number of parameters, and requires that the different actors have competencies in dealing with democratic processes and multi- ple constituencies that are never called upon under authoritarian systems. On the con- trary, the legislature in authoritarian states is often content to “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s”—that is, to leave the responsibility for things military with the military and/or the security services, as such matters “cannot be understood by lay persons anyway.” In a similar vein, within their ministry itself the defense planners may decide to leave their task essentially in the hands of the “commissars” of the presidential appa- ratus, as this is the place where power is concentrated and monopolized in such sys- tems. As an important consequence, defense planning in transitional states is fraught with problems that are all too familiar: an executive which has first to learn about transparent planning cycles and gain self-confidence in the implementation thereof; a legislative power which needs to learn about guidance and oversight mechanisms; and national media and institutions of civil society which need to change their expectations from commenting on the successes of authoritarian leadership to the assumption of the responsibility for public oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 (15. Februar 2017)
    2017/03 ISSN 1661-8211 | 117. Jahrgang | 15. Februar 2017 Redaktion und Herausgeberin: Schweizerische Nationalbibliothek NB, Hallwylstrasse 15, CH-3003 Bern Erscheinungsweise: halbmonatlich, am 15. und 30. jeden Monats Hinweise unter: http://ead.nb.admin.ch/web/sb-pdf/ ISSN 1661-8211 © Schweizerische Nationalbibliothek NB, CH-3003 Bern. Alle Rechte vorbehalten Inhaltsverzeichnis - Table des matières - Sommario - Cuntegn - Table of contents Inhaltsverzeichnis - Table des matières - 220 Bibel / Bible / Bibbia / Bibla / Bible....................................... 6 Sommario - Cuntegn - Table of contents 230 Christentum, christliche Theologie / Christianisme, théologie chrétienne / Cristianesimo, teologia cristiana / Cristianissem, teologia cristiana / Christianity and Christian theology..................6 000 Allgemeine Werke, Informatik, Informationswissenschaft / Informatique, information, 290 Andere Religionen / Autres religions / Altre religioni / Autras ouvrages de référence / Informatica, scienza religiuns / Other religions............................................................... 9 dell'informazione, generalità / Informatica, infurmaziun e referenzas generalas / Computers, information and general reference........................................................................................ 1 300 Sozialwissenschaften / Sciences sociales / Scienze sociali / Scienzas socialas / Social sciences.......................... 10 000 Allgemeine Werke, Wissen, Systeme / Généralités, savoir, systèmes / Generalità, sapere, sistemi / Generalitads,
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Evaluation of European Commission Support to Justice and Security System Reform
    Thematic Evaluation of European Commission Support to Justice and Security System Reform Final Report Volume I – Main Report November 2011 Evaluation for the European Commission Framework contract for Multi-country thematic and regional/country-level strategy European Group for evaluation studies and synthesis in the area of external co- Evaluation EEIG Germany operation LOT 2: Multi-country evaluation studies on social/human development issues of EC external co-operation PARTICIP GmbH Germany Ref.: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi Request for Service: 2010/234349 Aide à la Décision Economique Belgium Thhematic Evaluation of European Commission Support to Justice and Security Italy System Reform Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik Germany European Centre for Development Policy Management Final Report Belgium Volume I – Main Report Overseas Development Institute, United Kingdom South Research November 2011 Belgium A consortium of EGEVAL II (Particip & ADE) –DRN-DIE– ECDPM-ODI c/o Particip GmbH, leading Thhis evaluation was carried out by company: Headquarters Merzhauser Str. 183 D - 79100 Freiburg / Germany Phone: +49-761-79074-0 Fax: +49-761-79074-90 [email protected] The evaluation has been managed by the Joint Evaluation Unit in DG DEVCO. The author accepts sole responsibility for this report, drawn up on behalf of the Commission of the European Union. The report does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission. Thematic Evaluation of the European Commission Support to Justice and Security System Reform ADE - EGEVAL II Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 OVERALL OBJECTIVE, MANDATE AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION .......................... 1 1.2 KEY PHASES OF THE EVALUATION .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cry Havoc: Simon Mann's Account of His Failed Equatorial Guinea Coup
    Transcript Cry Havoc: Simon Mann’s Account of his Failed Equatorial Guinea Coup Attempt Simon Mann Author and Coup Attempt Leader Discussant: Alex Vines Director, Regional and Security Studies, Chatham House Chair: Professor Nana Poku John Ferguson Professor of African Studies and Dean, School of Social and International Studies, University of Bradford 1 November 2011 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s)/ speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication or details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions, but the ultimate responsibility for accuracy lies with this document’s author(s). The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. Transcript: Simon Mann Professor Nana Poku: It is a considerable pleasure and also a bit of apprehension that I sit in this seat, in large part because of some of the accounts in the book and some of the complexities of the issues that have ensued since then. But I am delighted to welcome Simon Mann who requires no further introduction I’m sure, but for the sake of those of us who like formalities, Simon is a former SAS [officer] and was actively involved – I’m not sure whether I can repeat what was said on a website about being an attempted coup plotter – but certainly there was a bit of an incident in Central and Southern Africa in 2004 which I think Simon has some insight that he has kindly agreed to share with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence
    Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence A Compendium of Best Practices The publication of this Compendium is supported by NATO and the Swiss Ministry of Defence Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence: A Compendium of Best Practices Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) www.dcaf.ch The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces is one of the world’s leading institutions in the areas of security sector reform (SSR) and security sector governance (SSG). DCAF provides in-country advisory support and practical assistance programmes, develops and promotes appropriate democratic norms at the international and national levels, advocates good practices and makes policy recommendations to ensure effective democratic governance of the security sector. DCAF’s partners include governments, parliaments, civil society, international organisations and the range of security sector actors such as police, judiciary, intelligence agencies, border security services and the military. 2010 Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence: A Compendium of Best Practices Geneva, 2010 The following persons participated in the production of the Compendium of Best Practices in Building Integrity and Reducing Corruption in Defence Editorial Board Philipp Fluri (DCAF), Adrian Kendry (NATO), Simon Lunn (DCAF), Mark Pyman (TI-UK) Editor and Lead Author: Todor Tagarev (Bulgaria) Contributors Jean-Jacques de Dardel (Switzerland) – Foreword, Francois Melese (US) – Chapters 2 and 9, Adrian Kendry and Susan Pond (NATO) – Chapter 3, James Greene (US) – Chap- ters 5, 16 and 22, Mark Pyman (UK) – Chapter 8, Aditya Batara (Indonesia) – Chapter 11, George Lucas (US) – Chapter 12, Alxandre Kukhianidze, Tamuna Karosanidze, Nina Khatiskatsi and Alexander Scrivener (Georgia) – Chapter 13, Anne-Christine Wegener and Mark Pyman (TI-UK) – Chapter 14, Leonid Polyakov (Ukraine) and James Greene (US) – Chapter 17, Wim F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of EU Security Sector Assistance: Learning from Experience
    ecdpm’s Making policies work DISCUSSION PAPER No. 271 The future of EU security sector assistance: learning from experience By Matthias Deneckere, Ashley Neat and Volker Hauck May 2020 This paper reflects on the future of the EU’s role in working with foreign security actors. It does so in the context of debates on how to better equip EU external action to deal with conflict and instability, including through a European Peace Facility, while also operationalising the linkages between security and development. Our analysis looks at the support to security sector reform (SSR) as an instrument that resides at this nexus and faces various challenges at the strategic and operational level. Such challenges include balancing short- and long-term objectives, reconciling interests and values, ensuring context sensitivity and overcoming bureaucratic and cultural divisions between policy communities. Drawing on practices from the EU and three member states (Germany, France and the Netherlands) in the domain of security sector reform, the paper provides insights on how such challenges can be practically dealt with. First, it argues that a comprehensive SSR policy not only requires a spelled-out strategy, but also a continued dialogue process between security, peace and development communities at the strategic and policy level, involving experts and civil society actors. Second, SSR needs to build on localised approaches that are informed by political context analysis and build on existing reform processes or windows of opportunity to foster change through targeted interventions. Third, cooperation with security actors should consider the risks in doing harm or negatively impacting conflict dynamics. Practical tools exist to manage risks, but negative effects can never be completely controlled.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Strategy for ETH Zurich
    ESC Energy Science Center Energy Strategy for ETH Zurich ETH Zurich Energy Science Center Sonneggstrasse 3 8092 Zurich Switzerland Tel. +41 (0)44 632 83 88 www.esc.ethz.ch Imprint Scientific editors K. Boulouchos (Chair), ETH Zurich C. Casciaro, ETH Zurich K. Fröhlich, ETH Zurich S. Hellweg, ETH Zurich HJ. Leibundgut, ETH Zurich D. Spreng, ETH Zurich Layout null-oder-eins.ch Design Corporate Communications, ETH Zurich Translation and editing editranslate.com, Zurich Images Page 12, Solar Millennium AG Page 28, Axpo Available from: Energy Science Center ETH Zurich Sonneggstrasse 3 CH-8092 Zurich www.esc.ethz.ch [email protected] © Energy Science Center February 2008 Zurich Energy Strategy for ETH Zurich 1 Contents Editorial 2 Executive Summary 3 Goals of the Strategy and Working Method 8 Challenges and Boundary Conditions 9 Energy Research at ETH Zurich 13 Energy supply 14 Energy use 19 Interactions with society and the environment 24 Energy Education at ETH Zurich 29 Vision of a Transformation Path 30 Implications for ETH Zurich 35 Appendix Contributors to the Energy Strategy 39 Editorial 2 In the fall of 2006, the Energy Science Center (ESC) of The ESC members will continue to be actively involved so ETH Zurich embarked on the task of adjusting its plans that the cross-cutting strategic and operational effort for future energy-related teaching and research to match just begun here in energy research and teaching can the magnitude of the challenges in the national and glo- yield fruit. This strategy report constitutes a first impor- bal arena. At that time the executive committee of the tant step towards an intensified dialogue both within Energy Science Center instructed an internal working ETH Zurich as well as with interested partners in industry, group to begin formulating a research strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • GSC-2010-Participants
    REGISTRATIONS of Graduate School on Control 2010 from 01/02/2010 to 14/05/2010 Nom Prénom Service Société Ville Pays ACUNA-BRAVO Wilber Automatique informatique POLITECNICO DI TORINO TORINO ITALIA ADEGAS Fabiano D. AALBORG UUNIVERSITY Aalborg DENMARK ADEMOVIC Alma Electrical engineering University of Sarajevo Sarajevo BOSNIA ADINANDRA Sisdarmanto Eindhoven NETHERLANDS ALAWIEH Aya L2S SUPELEC Gif-sur-Yvette FRANCE ALVAREZ TORO Luz Adriana Chemical engineering USP - University of Sao Paulo Sao Paulo BRAZIL ATUONWU James Systems and control Wageningen University Wageningen NETHERLANDS BARCELLI Davide Engineering information Universita Degli Siena ITALY BAYRAK Gulden Munich GERMANY Tallinn University of BELIKOV Juri Computer control Tallinn ESTONIA Technology BENINE NETO André LIVIC Versailles FRANCE BENSMANN Boris Systemverfahrenstechnik Institut für Verfahrenstechnik Magdeburg GERMANY BEZZAOUCHA Souad L2S SUPELEC Gif sur Yvette FRANCE Eindhoven university of BIEMOND Benjamin Mechanical engineering Eindhoven NETHERLANDS technology University of California BLANDIN Sebastien Civil Systems Program BERKELEY USA Berkeley BOEGLI Max MECH-PMA Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM BORRI Alessandro University of l'Aquila Monteluco di Roio ITALY BRESCH-PIETRI Delphine CAS ENSMP Neuilly/s/Marne FRANCE BREU Dominik NTNU Trondheim NORWAY BREZAS Panagiotis Cambridge UK Montbonnot Saint BRINON ARRANZ Lara Département automatique INP Grenoble FRANCE Ismier BRISTEAU Pierre-Jean CAS ENSMP Paris FRANCE Thermal processing BUCK Andreas Otto-von-Guericke
    [Show full text]