DOCSLIB.ORG

The Bulletin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Bulletin THE BULLETIN The Bulletin is a publication of the European Commission for Democracy through Law. It reports regularly on the case-law of constitutional courts and courts of equivalent jurisdiction in Europe, including the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Communities, as well as in certain other countries of the world. The Bulletin is published three times a year, each issue reporting the most important case-law during a four months period (volumes numbered 1 to 3). The last two volumes of the series concerning the same year are actually published and delivered in the following year, i.e. volume 1 of the 2002 Edition in 2002, volumes 2 and 3 in 2003. Its aim is to allow judges and constitutional law specialists to be informed quickly about the most important judgments in this field. The exchange of information and ideas among old and new democracies in the field of judge-made law is of vital importance. Such an exchange and such cooperation, it is hoped, will not only be of benefit to the newly established constitutional courts, but will also enrich the case-law of the existing courts. The main purpose of the Bulletin on Constitutional Case-law is to foster such an exchange and to assist national judges in solving critical questions of law which often arise simultaneously in different countries. The Commission is grateful to liaison officers of constitutional and other equivalent courts, who regularly prepare the contributions reproduced in this publication. As such, the summaries of decisions and opinions published in the Bulletin do not constitute an official record of court decisions and should not be considered as offering or purporting to offer an authoritative interpretation of the law. The decisions are presented in the following way: 1. Identification a) country or organisation b) name of the court c) chamber (if appropriate) d) date of the decision e) number of decision or case f) title (if appropriate) g) official publication h) non-official publications 2. Keywords of the Systematic Thesaurus (primary) 3. Keywords of the alphabetical index (supplementary) 4. Headnotes 5. Summary 6. Supplementary information 7. Cross-references 8. Languages G. Buquicchio Secretary of the European Commission for Democracy through Law THE VENICE COMMISSION The European Commission for Democracy through Law, better known as the Venice Commission, has played a leading role in the adoption of constitutions in Central and Eastern Europe that conform to the standards of Europe's constitu- tional heritage. Initially conceived as an instrument of emergency constitutional engineering against a background of transition towards democracy, the Commission since has gradually evolved into an internationally recognised independent legal think-tank. It acts in the constitutional field understood in a broad sense, which includes, for example, laws on constitutional courts, laws governing national minorities and electoral law. Established in 1990 as a partial agreement of 18 member states of the Council of Europe, the Commission in February 2002 became an enlarged agreement, comprising all 45 member States of the organisation and working with some other 12 countries from Africa, America, Asia and Europe. Secretariat of the Venice Commission Council of Europe F-67075 STRASBOURG CEDEX Tel: (33) 3 88413908 - Fax: (33) 3 88413738 [email protected] Editors: Sc. R. Dürr, D. Bojic-Bultrini S. Burton, S. Matrundola, A. Gorey, M.-L. Wigishoff Liaison officers: Albania ..................................... S. Sadushi / L. Pirdeni Korea ............................................................ S. D. Kim Andorra .......................................... M. Tomàs Baldrich Kyrgyzstan ........................................ K. E. Esenkanov Argentina ................................................ R. E. Gialdino Latvia ........................................................ D. Pededze Armenia .................................................... G. Vahanian Liechtenstein .................................................. I. Elkuch Austria .................................................... R. Huppmann Lithuania .................................................. S. Stačiokas Azerbaijan ................................................... R. Guliyev Luxembourg ....................................................... G. Kill Belgium ................... A. Rasson Roland / R. Ryckeboer Bosnia and Herzegovina .......................... D. Kalember Malta ................................................................. A. Ellul Bulgaria ......................................................... K. Manov Moldova ........................................................... M. Iuga Canada ...................................................... C. Marquis Netherlands ..................................... S. Van Den Oever Croatia ................................................................ T. Kic Norway .............................................. A. M. Samuelson Cyprus ............................................................. P. Kallis Poland .............................................................. H. Plak Czech Republic ............................................................ Portugal ................................................ A. Duarte Silva ................. E. Wagnerova / A. Mácová / S. Matochová Romania ............................................ G. Dragomirescu Denmark ...................................... A.-K. Stig Andersen Russia ........................................................ E. Pyrickov Estonia ....................................................... P. Roosma Slovakia ..................................................... G. Fet’kova Finland ............................. M. Könkkölä / P. Pietarinen Slovenia ....................................................... A. Mavčič France ............................................................. M. Pauti South Africa ........ S. Luthuli / K. O'Regan / K. Williams Georgia .................................................. L. Bodzashvili Spain .................................................. I. Borrajo Iniesta Germany ............................. R. Jaeger / W. Rohrhuber Greece ................. K. Menoudakos / O. Papadopoulou Sweden ............................. M. Ahrling / M. Palmstierna Hungary ................................. P. Paczolay / K. Kovács Switzerland ........... P. Tschümperlin / J. Alberini-Boillat Iceland ...................................................... H. Torfason “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” ............. Ireland ...................................... F. Flanagan / M. Kane .................................................................. S. Petrovski Israel ..................................... Y. Mersel / G. Gontovnik Turkey ........................................................... B. Sözen Italy .......................................................... G. Cattarino Ukraine ............................... V. Ivaschenko / I. Shevliak Japan ............................................................ N. Onishi United Kingdom .............. K. Schiemann / N. De Marco Kazakhstan ........................ N. Akujev / M. Berkaliyeva United States of America .. F. Lorson / S. Rider / P. Krug European Court of Human Rights ................................................................... S. Naismith Court of Justice of the European Communities ............................................... Ph. Singer Strasbourg, October 2003 CONTENTS Albania ................................................................... 385 Latvia ..................................................................... 464 Argentina ............................................................... 387 Liechtenstein .......................................................... 468 Armenia ................................................................. 389 Lithuania ................................................................ 469 Austria ................................................................... 391 Moldova ................................................................. 475 Azerbaijan .............................................................. 395 Netherlands ............................................................ 478 Belgium .................................................................. 398 Norway ................................................................... 479 Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................... 403 Poland .................................................................... 483 Bulgaria ................................................................. 404 Portugal .................................................................. 494 Canada .................................................................. 406 Romania ................................................................. 502 Croatia ................................................................... 409 Russia .................................................................... 505 Cyprus ................................................................... 426 Slovenia ................................................................. 507 Czech Republic ..................................................... 427 South Africa ........................................................... 510 Denmark ................................................................ 437 Sweden .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Criminal Law of Afghanistan
    2ND EDITION AN INTRODUCTION TO THE C RIMINAL LAW OF AFGHANISTAN An Introduction to the Criminal Law of Afghanistan Second Edition Afghanistan Legal Education Project (ALEP) Stanford Law School http://alep.stanford.edu [email protected] Stanford Law School Crown Quadrangle 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 www.law.stanford.edu ALEP – STANFORD LAW SCHOOL Authors Eli Sugarman (Co-Founder, Student Co-Director, 2008-09) Anne Stephens Lloyd (Student Co-Director, 2008-09) Raaj Narayan (Student Co-Director, 2009-10) Max Rettig (Student Co-Director, 2009-10) Una Au Scott Schaeffer Editors Stephanie Ahmad (Rule of Law Fellow, 2011-12) Rose Leda Ehler (Student Co-Director, 2011-12) Daniel Lewis (Student Co-Director, 2011-12) Elizabeth Espinosa Jane Farrington Gabriel Ledeen Nicholas Reed Faculty Director Erik Jensen Rule of Law Program Executive Director Megan Karsh Program Advisor Rolando Garcia Miron AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF AFGHANISTAN Contributing Faculty Editors Nafay Choudhury Rohullah Azizi Naqib Ahmad Khpulwak Hamid Khan Chair of the Department of Law Taylor Strickling, 2012-13 Hadley Rose, 2013-14 Mehdi Hakimi, 2014- Translation Assistance Elite Legal Services, Ltd. Table of Contents PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1: AN INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
    LESSON ONE “United States Code of Law – Title 18, Chapter 13 Section 241 & 242” Need: All across the Corporate State of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and its many subordinate ENCLAVES (CORPORATE STATE OF MISSOURI, CITY OF FERGUSON, ETC.) there has been an increasing amount of “Deprivation of Human, International and Indigenous Rights” committed by “alleged” Public Officials/Officers who are operating under “COLOR OF LAW”. Through Our analysis of the Michael “Mike Mike” Brown Jr. Case/Situation and through Our study and application of the Supreme Law of the Land (U.S.C., Constitutional, and International) we will be able to over stand the lawful status and predicament of the so-called Black, Colored, Negro, and African- American communities and what must be done to Lawfully to correct the “Problem” of Our People. End Goal: To inform Natural Persons and Citizens, alike, of their Constitutional, Universal Human, and Indigenous Rights so that they may confidently Exercise and if needed Defend their Unalienable Rights with impunity. United States Code of Law – (U.S.C.) - The Code of Laws of the United States of America[1] (variously abbreviated to Code of Laws of the United States, United States Code, U.S. Code, or U.S.C.) is the official compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal laws of the United States. It contains 51 titles,[2] along with a further four proposed titles.[3] The main edition is published every six years by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives, and cumulative supplements are published annually.[4][5] The official version of those laws not codified in the United States Code can be found in United States Statutes at Large.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Rule of Law
    History of the Rule of Law 1 CONTEMPORARY FINE ART COLLECTION Since it opened in 1933, the Thomas J. Moyer Ohio Judicial Center has been home to numerous soaring and spectacular murals, and neoclassical, awe-inspiring architecture. Today, a new generation of art is also on display throughout the building. The Supreme Court of Ohio contemporary fine art collection is a unique display of pieces from renowned Ohio artists, portraying themes exploring the beauty of the law, the diversity of our land and the nobility of Ohio’s most precious resource: its people. HISTORY OF THE RULE OF LAW SERIES The Supreme Court of Ohio Rule of Law Gallery is home to the History of the Rule of Law, a series of six, 4x6’ oil paintings created by artist Ron Anderson that depict the evolution of law in Western civilization. The paintings, located on the 11th Floor of the Moyer Judicial Center, are on permanent loan from the Ohio State Bar Association. THE CODE OF HAMMURABI AND THE RULE OF RAMSES THE GREAT TheTh Code C d of f Hammurabi H bi and d the h Rule R l of f Ramses R the h Great G , 2005,2005 oil il on canvas. The first panel presents Hammurabi (1795-1750 B.C.), the Babylonian king to whom the first written Code of Law is attributed. He appears to be in the process of passing judgment on a situation before him, while a scribe records the proceedings in cuneiform. To the right of the Egyptian column in the center of the panel is a study of the “Land of Khem,” or Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunal-7-2019.Pdf
    07C / 2019 Das Magazin des Österreichischen KOMMUNAL Gemeindebundes GEMEINDEN.GESTALTEN.ÖSTERREICH. KOMMUNALMESSE Schwere Maschinen, tropische Tempera- turen, Massen von Besuchern - Bilder einer Ausstellung ab Seite 16 IMPULS 2019 Österreichs innova- tivste Gemeinde ist gefunden Seite 22 „Die Gemeinden zeigen, wie’s geht“ Am Gemeindetag in Graz legten die Gemeinden der Bundespolitik kommunale Tugenden ans Herz: nachhaltiges Wirtschaften, vorausschauendes Denken und verantwortungsbewußtes Planen. ab Seite 6 Österr. Kommunalverlag, 1010 Wien, Löwelstr. 6 ISSN: 1605-1440 Einzelverkaufspreis: EUR 4,90 Einzelverkaufspreis: Retouren an Postfach 100, 1350 Wien Österreichische Post AG MZ 02Z032902 M Sie haben das öffentliche Projekt. Wir haben das Know- 1.300 how. Gemeinden vertrauen uns bawagpsk.com MAKD19084E_Public_Inserat_2019_215x280_190617_1430_RZ.indd 1 17.06.19 15:44 MEINUNG GEMEINDETAG „NICHTS GEHT OHNE Sie haben das DIE GEMEINDEN“ öffentliche Projekt. m 66. Österreichischen Gemeindetag in Graz haben sich dieses Mal rund 2500 Bürgermeisterinnen und Bürgermeister sowie Gemeindevertreter und Bedienstete versammelt und damit ein starkes Zeichen der Einigkeit und des Miteinanders gesetzt. Dass die Gemeinden das Rückgrat unserer NUTZEN WIR DIE Demokratie sind und in dieser Republik nichts ohne uns geht, wissen wir AUFMERKSAMKEIT Wir Aschon lange. Die Spitzen der Staates, von Bundespräsident Alexander Van der Bellen, Bundeskanzlerin Brigitte Bierlein, bis zu Nationalratspräsident Wolfgang Sobotka und FÜR DAS THEMA Landeshauptmann Hermann Schützenhöfer haben in ihren Ansprachen die Rolle und NACHHALTIGKEIT, Bedeutung der Kommunen für die Entwicklung unseres Landes und der Regionen klar und deutlich hervorgestrichen und die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Gemeindebund ge- UM DIE VON UNS würdigt. In der Geschichte der Gemeindetage ist es schon etwas Einzigartiges, dass die GESETZTEN haben obersten drei Repräsentanten der Republik gleichzeitig anwesend sind und den 2096 Gemeinden damit ihre Wertschätzung ausdrücken.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Austria Austria’S Place in Europe and the World
    Global Austria Austria’s Place in Europe and the World Günter Bischof, Fritz Plasser (Eds.) Anton Pelinka, Alexander Smith, Guest Editors CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | Volume 20 innsbruck university press Copyright ©2011 by University of New Orleans Press, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to UNO Press, University of New Orleans, ED 210, 2000 Lakeshore Drive, New Orleans, LA, 70119, USA. www.unopress.org. Book design: Lindsay Maples Cover cartoon by Ironimus (1992) provided by the archives of Die Presse in Vienna and permission to publish granted by Gustav Peichl. Published in North America by Published in Europe by University of New Orleans Press Innsbruck University Press ISBN 978-1-60801-062-2 ISBN 978-3-9028112-0-2 Contemporary Austrian Studies Sponsored by the University of New Orleans and Universität Innsbruck Editors Günter Bischof, CenterAustria, University of New Orleans Fritz Plasser, Universität Innsbruck Production Editor Copy Editor Bill Lavender Lindsay Maples University of New Orleans University of New Orleans Executive Editors Klaus Frantz, Universität Innsbruck Susan Krantz, University of New Orleans Advisory Board Siegfried Beer Helmut Konrad Universität Graz Universität
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Law Worldwide: Учеб
    ИИ..НН.. ААййннууттддиинноовваа DDIISSCCOOVVEERR LLAAWW WWOORRLLDDWWIIDDEE часть I И.Н. Айнутдинова DDIISSCCOOVVEERR LLAAWW WWOORRLLDDWWIIDDEE Под общей редакцией доктора филологических наук, профессора Г.А. Багаутдиновой Учебное пособие по английскому языку для студентов юридических факультетов вузов Часть I 1 Печатается по рекомендации Учебно-методической комиссии и Учёного совета Института языка КГУ Научный консультант: академик РАО, доктор педагогических наук, профессор Г.В. Мухаметзянова Рецензенты: доктор педагогических наук, профессор Т.М.Трегубова; доктор филологических наук, профессор А.Г.Садыкова Айнутдинова И.Н. DISCOVER LAW WORLDWIDE: учеб. пособие по английскому языку для студентов юридических факультетов вузов: в 5 ч. / И. Н. Айнутдинова; под общ. ред. Г. А. Багаутдиновой. - Казань, Издательство Казанского университета, 2010. – 210 с. ISBN 978-5-98180-770-1 Учебное пособие «DISCOVER LAW WORLDWIDE» (часть I) начинает серию учебных книг по практическому изучению английского языка для студентов юридических факультетов высшей профессиональной школы, состоящей из 5 частей. Пособие состоит из 7-ми законченных модулей (блоков), снабжено дополнительным учебным материалом в виде шаблонов таблиц для заполнения с целью структурирования, систематизации и закрепления знаний по теме изучения; тем и заданий для самостоятельного и группового творчества; глоссария, содержащего наиболее значимую лексику по темам изучения; блока по дополнительному самостоятельному чтению текстов и отдельных тематически значимых правовых актов. Пособие отражает
    [Show full text]
  • International Association of Prosecutors
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROSECUTORS ANNUAL REPORT 2001 - 2002 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROSECUTORS ANNUAL REPORT 2001 - 2002 Introduction This is the IAP's third formal Annual Report. As well as being available to participants at the General Meeting and to other members on request from the Secretary-General, it may be found on the IAP website (www.iap.nl.com). Executive Committee Meeting, 1 September 2001 Friedrich Matousek (Austria) said farewell to the Executive Committee after six years and thanked colleagues. Current organisational membership stood at 77 and individual membership at 1127. The Executive Committee discussed a draft of the Protocol for Nominations by the Executive Committee to the Executive Committee. The text of the final protocol would be placed on the website. The nominations for office which were to be put to the General Meeting were agreed. Nominations for 2002 were discussed and approved as detailed above. The Secretary-General reported that the financial situation had improved and the Finnish Government and AUSAID had provided support to the Granting Program, again enabling colleagues from developing countries to attend the conference. Retha Meintjes (South Africa) reported on her attendance at the 2nd DPP Forum in Nigeria and the General Counsel on his attendance at the 2nd Pan-European Meeting of European Prosecutors General and the 21st Annual Conference of the Federal Prosecution Service of Canada. The next regional (“mini”) conference would be held in The Hague on 20-22 March 2002. It was also hoped to hold one for Oceania and the President encouraged members to hold such events in their regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomarbeit "Justiz Und Verwaltung Im Spannungsfeld Zwischen Recht Und Politik" Mag
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OTHES 1 Diplomarbeit "Justiz und Verwaltung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Recht und Politik" Mag. Dr. iur. Robert TODER Mag. phil. Wien, im Oktober 2008 Studienkennzahl A 300 Politikwissenschaft Betreuer: o. Univ. Prof. Dr. iur. Peter GERLICH 2 1. Grundsätzliches und staatstheoretische Überlegungen……………………………….................6 1.1. Einleitung………………………………….................................................................................6 1.2. Begriffsbestimmungen und theoretische Grundsatzüberlegungen………………………….….6 1.2.1. Der Staat………………………………….............................................................................…6 1.2.1.1. Definition des Staates im Sinne der Politikwissenschaft…………………………………...…7 1.2.1.2. Definition des Staates im Sinne der Soziologie…………………………………....................8 1.2.1.3. Definition des Staates im Sinne der Allgemeinen Staatslehre……………………………….8 1.2.1.4. Das Staatsgebiet…………………………………..................................................................9 1.2.1.5. Das Staatsvolk…………………………………..................................................................…9 1.2.1.6 Die Staatsgewalt………………………………….................................................................11 1.2.1.7. Der Staat im verfassungsrechtlichen Sinn…………………………………..........................12 1.2.1.8. Der Staat im völkerrechtlichen Sinn…………………………………...................................12 1.2.1.9. Die Definition des Staates im strafrechtlichen Sinn…………………………………............13
    [Show full text]
  • SCCCMA Law Enforcement Liability
    Law Enforcement Liability South Carolina City and County Management Association Todd Williams Law Enforcement Stakeholders Meeting • Increase law enforcement training • Support reliable funding for the Criminal Justice Academy to allow for more training opportunities for law enforcement officers. • Increase funding for body worn cameras 1 Civil Actions • Intentional Torts: An intentional tort would occur when an officer, without justification, intentionally commits an act which is recognized by the law as a tort. • For example, if an officer were to use his baton to intentionally strike someone who had done nothing wrong. In the law of torts this would be recognized as a battery. In order to prove a battery; the plaintiff must prove that the officer intentionally caused a harmful or offensive contact to the plaintiff’s body. Civil Actions • Negligence Actions: Another type of tort for which an officer may be sued is the tort of negligence. There are four basic elements of a negligence action. – A duty owed- All persons generally have a duty to act with reasonable care toward those they come into contact with. – A breach of the duty-A person breaches their duty when they fail to exercise reasonable care. – Causation- The breach of duty must be the cause in-fact and the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury. – Damages-The plaintiff must suffer some damages as a result of the breach of duty. 2 Violation of Civil Rights- 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983. – Provides citizens with a remedy for redressing violations of civil rights. – Mechanism for enforcing rights that are granted by the United States Constitution or by a federal statue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marshall Plan in Austria 69
    CAS XXV CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIANAUSTRIAN STUDIES STUDIES | VOLUME VOLUME 25 25 This volume celebrates the study of Austria in the twentieth century by historians, political scientists and social scientists produced in the previous twenty-four volumes of Contemporary Austrian Studies. One contributor from each of the previous volumes has been asked to update the state of scholarship in the field addressed in the respective volume. The title “Austrian Studies Today,” then, attempts to reflect the state of the art of historical and social science related Bischof, Karlhofer (Eds.) • Austrian Studies Today studies of Austria over the past century, without claiming to be comprehensive. The volume thus covers many important themes of Austrian contemporary history and politics since the collapse of the Habsburg Monarchy in 1918—from World War I and its legacies, to the rise of authoritarian regimes in the 1930s and 1940s, to the reconstruction of republican Austria after World War II, the years of Grand Coalition governments and the Kreisky era, all the way to Austria joining the European Union in 1995 and its impact on Austria’s international status and domestic politics. EUROPE USA Austrian Studies Studies Today Today GünterGünter Bischof,Bischof, Ferdinand Ferdinand Karlhofer Karlhofer (Eds.) (Eds.) UNO UNO PRESS innsbruck university press UNO PRESS UNO PRESS innsbruck university press Austrian Studies Today Günter Bischof, Ferdinand Karlhofer (Eds.) CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | VOLUME 25 UNO PRESS innsbruck university press Copyright © 2016 by University of New Orleans Press All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage nd retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance
    Florida State University College of Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Publications 2001 The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance Wayne A. Logan Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Wayne A. Logan, The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance, 62 OHIO ST. L.J. 1409 (2001), Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/196 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 62 Ohio St. L.J. 1409 2001 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Wed Apr 29 13:00:47 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0048-1572 The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance WAYNE A. LOGAN* Although it often escapes attention, municipal governments possess significant authority to enact criminal laws consistent with their expansive home rule and police powers. In this article, Professor Logan explores the numerous ways in which this authority manifests, and reflects upon, several of the main concerns presented by the "shadow criminal law" thereby created.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Cultures of Punishment
    Stanford Law Review Volume 68 May 2016 ARTICLE Two Cultures of Punishment Joshua Kleinfeld* Abstract. As American criminal punishment has become more severe and European more mild, the two systems of punishment have come to represent different cultural possibilities for the modern West. Implicit in American and European punishment are two visions of wrongdoing and wrongdoers, of the terms of the social contract, and of the foundations of rights. American punishment pictures serious offenders as morally deformed people rather than ordinary people who have committed crimes. Their criminality is thus both immutable and devaluing, a feature of the actor rather than merely the act. The forms of punishment deployed in response do not just exact retribution or exert social control, they expressively deny offenders’ claims to membership in the community and to the moral humanity in virtue of which a human being is rights bearing. European criminal punishment expressively denies that any offense marks the offender as a morally deformed person. Criminality is always mutable and never devaluing, actors are kept at a distance from their acts, and the forms of punishment affirm even the worst offenders’ claims to social membership and rights. These conflicting moral visions are not only implicit or immanent in European and American punishment but likely played a role—albeit not an exclusive role—in causing European and American punishment to diverge. After an enormous mid-century crime wave, two very different groups took hold of America’s politics of crime: moralists who viewed criminals as evil and instrumentalists who viewed criminals as dangerous beings. Different as the two groups were, they agreed on policy: for both, the crime problem was a criminals problem, and the solution was to get rid of criminals.
    [Show full text]