DOCSLIB.ORG

Criminal Law of Afghanistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Criminal Law of Afghanistan 2ND EDITION AN INTRODUCTION TO THE C RIMINAL LAW OF AFGHANISTAN An Introduction to the Criminal Law of Afghanistan Second Edition Afghanistan Legal Education Project (ALEP) Stanford Law School http://alep.stanford.edu [email protected] Stanford Law School Crown Quadrangle 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 www.law.stanford.edu ALEP – STANFORD LAW SCHOOL Authors Eli Sugarman (Co-Founder, Student Co-Director, 2008-09) Anne Stephens Lloyd (Student Co-Director, 2008-09) Raaj Narayan (Student Co-Director, 2009-10) Max Rettig (Student Co-Director, 2009-10) Una Au Scott Schaeffer Editors Stephanie Ahmad (Rule of Law Fellow, 2011-12) Rose Leda Ehler (Student Co-Director, 2011-12) Daniel Lewis (Student Co-Director, 2011-12) Elizabeth Espinosa Jane Farrington Gabriel Ledeen Nicholas Reed Faculty Director Erik Jensen Rule of Law Program Executive Director Megan Karsh Program Advisor Rolando Garcia Miron AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF AFGHANISTAN Contributing Faculty Editors Nafay Choudhury Rohullah Azizi Naqib Ahmad Khpulwak Hamid Khan Chair of the Department of Law Taylor Strickling, 2012-13 Hadley Rose, 2013-14 Mehdi Hakimi, 2014- Translation Assistance Elite Legal Services, Ltd. Table of Contents PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1: AN INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW ................................................. 1 I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 II. OBJECTIVES OF CRIMINAL LAW ................................................................................ 1 1. Retribution ...................................................................................................................... 2 2. Incapacitation ................................................................................................................. 5 3. Deterrence ...................................................................................................................... 6 4. Rehabilitation ................................................................................................................. 8 III. SOURCES OF CRIMINAL LAW...................................................................................... 9 1. The Constitution ............................................................................................................. 9 2. Islamic Law .................................................................................................................. 11 3. The Penal Code of 1976 ............................................................................................... 12 4. Legislative Acts ............................................................................................................. 12 IV. HISTORY OF CRIMINAL LAW IN AFGHANISTAN.................................................. 13 1. Origins of the Criminal Justice System in the Pre-Constitutional Era ........................ 13 2. The Dual Court System: 1920-1964 ............................................................................. 15 3. The Unified System of Criminal Adjudication .............................................................. 16 4. The Restoration of the Unified Court System ............................................................... 18 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 19 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................. 20 SOURCES CONSULTED ................................................................................................................ 21 CHAPTER 2: CRIME ................................................................................................................ 22 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 22 II. ELEMENTS OF A CRIME .............................................................................................. 23 1. Legal Element ............................................................................................................... 23 2. Material Element .......................................................................................................... 25 3. Moral Element .............................................................................................................. 28 III. CLASSIFICATION OF CRIME ...................................................................................... 32 1. Based on the Legal Element ......................................................................................... 33 2. Based on the Material Element .................................................................................... 33 3. Based on the Mental Element ....................................................................................... 35 IV. ATTEMPT ........................................................................................................................ 35 1. Elements of Attempt ...................................................................................................... 36 2. The Question of the Impossible Crime ......................................................................... 37 3. Punishment of Attempt .................................................................................................. 38 V. GROUP CRIMINALITY.................................................................................................. 38 1. Aiding and Abetting ...................................................................................................... 39 2. Alliance ......................................................................................................................... 41 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 43 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................. 44 SOURCES CONSULTED ................................................................................................................ 45 CHAPTER 3: CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY..................................................................... 46 I. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBLITY ....................................................................................... 47 II. LIMITATIONS ON CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY .................................................... 49 1. Justification .................................................................................................................. 49 2. Excuse .......................................................................................................................... 55 3. Challenges to the Administration of Justice – Resource Constraints .......................... 61 III. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF LEGAL PERSONS ............................................... 62 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 63 SOURCES CONSULTED ................................................................................................................ 64 CHAPTER 4: PUNISHMENT.................................................................................................. 65 I. PRINCIPAL PUNISHMENTS ......................................................................................... 66 1. Power to Set Sentences/Guidelines .............................................................................. 67 2. Discretion ..................................................................................................................... 67 3. Aggravating Circumstances ......................................................................................... 68 4. Mitigating Circumstances ............................................................................................ 69 5. Appellate Review .......................................................................................................... 70 6. Alternatives to Traditional Punishments – Alternative Dispute Resolution ................. 71 7. Prohibition against Double Jeopardy .......................................................................... 72 II. SUBORDINATE/CONSEQUENTIAL PUNISHMENTS ............................................... 74 III. COMPLEMENTARY PUNISHMENTS ......................................................................... 75 IV. THE INFORMAL LEGAL SYSTEM .............................................................................. 76 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 78 SOURCES CONSULTED ................................................................................................................ 80 CHAPTER 5: SUBSTANTIVE CRIMES IN AFGHAN CRIMINAL LAW ........................ 82 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 83 1. Legality ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ‌Caseload Statistics Report 2013
    2013 CASELOAD STATISTICS OF THE UNIFIED JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF PENNSYLVANIA Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ZYGMONT A. PINES COURT ADMINISTRATOR OF PENNSYLVANIA [This page intentionally left blank for printing purposes] Appellate Courts Orphans’ Court Caseload Supreme Court .................................................... 2 Orphans’ Court State Totals ....................... 98 Supreme Court Glossary ..................................... 4 Accounts ..................................................... 99 Superior Court ..................................................... 5 Accounts Glossary .................................... 101 Commonwealth Court .......................................... 6 Adoptions .................................................. 102 County Classifications & Judgeships ......................... 8 Adoptions Glossary ................................... 104 Common Pleas Courts Relinquishments/Terminations ................. 105 Relinquishments Glossary ........................ 107 Criminal Caseload (CPCMS) Appointment of Guardians ........................ 108 Criminal State Totals................................... 11 Guardianship Glossary ............................. 110 Filings, Case Types, and Dispositions ........ 12 Age of Pending Criminal Cases .................. 20 Jury Yield, Jury Utilization & Jury Costs Criminal Glossary........................................ 22 Jury State Totals ....................................... 112 Civil Caseload - Civil Action & Civil Other Jury ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
    LESSON ONE “United States Code of Law – Title 18, Chapter 13 Section 241 & 242” Need: All across the Corporate State of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and its many subordinate ENCLAVES (CORPORATE STATE OF MISSOURI, CITY OF FERGUSON, ETC.) there has been an increasing amount of “Deprivation of Human, International and Indigenous Rights” committed by “alleged” Public Officials/Officers who are operating under “COLOR OF LAW”. Through Our analysis of the Michael “Mike Mike” Brown Jr. Case/Situation and through Our study and application of the Supreme Law of the Land (U.S.C., Constitutional, and International) we will be able to over stand the lawful status and predicament of the so-called Black, Colored, Negro, and African- American communities and what must be done to Lawfully to correct the “Problem” of Our People. End Goal: To inform Natural Persons and Citizens, alike, of their Constitutional, Universal Human, and Indigenous Rights so that they may confidently Exercise and if needed Defend their Unalienable Rights with impunity. United States Code of Law – (U.S.C.) - The Code of Laws of the United States of America[1] (variously abbreviated to Code of Laws of the United States, United States Code, U.S. Code, or U.S.C.) is the official compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal laws of the United States. It contains 51 titles,[2] along with a further four proposed titles.[3] The main edition is published every six years by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives, and cumulative supplements are published annually.[4][5] The official version of those laws not codified in the United States Code can be found in United States Statutes at Large.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Rule of Law
    History of the Rule of Law 1 CONTEMPORARY FINE ART COLLECTION Since it opened in 1933, the Thomas J. Moyer Ohio Judicial Center has been home to numerous soaring and spectacular murals, and neoclassical, awe-inspiring architecture. Today, a new generation of art is also on display throughout the building. The Supreme Court of Ohio contemporary fine art collection is a unique display of pieces from renowned Ohio artists, portraying themes exploring the beauty of the law, the diversity of our land and the nobility of Ohio’s most precious resource: its people. HISTORY OF THE RULE OF LAW SERIES The Supreme Court of Ohio Rule of Law Gallery is home to the History of the Rule of Law, a series of six, 4x6’ oil paintings created by artist Ron Anderson that depict the evolution of law in Western civilization. The paintings, located on the 11th Floor of the Moyer Judicial Center, are on permanent loan from the Ohio State Bar Association. THE CODE OF HAMMURABI AND THE RULE OF RAMSES THE GREAT TheTh Code C d of f Hammurabi H bi and d the h Rule R l of f Ramses R the h Great G , 2005,2005 oil il on canvas. The first panel presents Hammurabi (1795-1750 B.C.), the Babylonian king to whom the first written Code of Law is attributed. He appears to be in the process of passing judgment on a situation before him, while a scribe records the proceedings in cuneiform. To the right of the Egyptian column in the center of the panel is a study of the “Land of Khem,” or Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Law Worldwide: Учеб
    ИИ..НН.. ААййннууттддиинноовваа DDIISSCCOOVVEERR LLAAWW WWOORRLLDDWWIIDDEE часть I И.Н. Айнутдинова DDIISSCCOOVVEERR LLAAWW WWOORRLLDDWWIIDDEE Под общей редакцией доктора филологических наук, профессора Г.А. Багаутдиновой Учебное пособие по английскому языку для студентов юридических факультетов вузов Часть I 1 Печатается по рекомендации Учебно-методической комиссии и Учёного совета Института языка КГУ Научный консультант: академик РАО, доктор педагогических наук, профессор Г.В. Мухаметзянова Рецензенты: доктор педагогических наук, профессор Т.М.Трегубова; доктор филологических наук, профессор А.Г.Садыкова Айнутдинова И.Н. DISCOVER LAW WORLDWIDE: учеб. пособие по английскому языку для студентов юридических факультетов вузов: в 5 ч. / И. Н. Айнутдинова; под общ. ред. Г. А. Багаутдиновой. - Казань, Издательство Казанского университета, 2010. – 210 с. ISBN 978-5-98180-770-1 Учебное пособие «DISCOVER LAW WORLDWIDE» (часть I) начинает серию учебных книг по практическому изучению английского языка для студентов юридических факультетов высшей профессиональной школы, состоящей из 5 частей. Пособие состоит из 7-ми законченных модулей (блоков), снабжено дополнительным учебным материалом в виде шаблонов таблиц для заполнения с целью структурирования, систематизации и закрепления знаний по теме изучения; тем и заданий для самостоятельного и группового творчества; глоссария, содержащего наиболее значимую лексику по темам изучения; блока по дополнительному самостоятельному чтению текстов и отдельных тематически значимых правовых актов. Пособие отражает
    [Show full text]
  • SCCCMA Law Enforcement Liability
    Law Enforcement Liability South Carolina City and County Management Association Todd Williams Law Enforcement Stakeholders Meeting • Increase law enforcement training • Support reliable funding for the Criminal Justice Academy to allow for more training opportunities for law enforcement officers. • Increase funding for body worn cameras 1 Civil Actions • Intentional Torts: An intentional tort would occur when an officer, without justification, intentionally commits an act which is recognized by the law as a tort. • For example, if an officer were to use his baton to intentionally strike someone who had done nothing wrong. In the law of torts this would be recognized as a battery. In order to prove a battery; the plaintiff must prove that the officer intentionally caused a harmful or offensive contact to the plaintiff’s body. Civil Actions • Negligence Actions: Another type of tort for which an officer may be sued is the tort of negligence. There are four basic elements of a negligence action. – A duty owed- All persons generally have a duty to act with reasonable care toward those they come into contact with. – A breach of the duty-A person breaches their duty when they fail to exercise reasonable care. – Causation- The breach of duty must be the cause in-fact and the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury. – Damages-The plaintiff must suffer some damages as a result of the breach of duty. 2 Violation of Civil Rights- 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983. – Provides citizens with a remedy for redressing violations of civil rights. – Mechanism for enforcing rights that are granted by the United States Constitution or by a federal statue.
    [Show full text]
  • California Penal Code Death Penalty
    California Penal Code Death Penalty Nomological Bradford evolving, his redox enfranchise shamble notarially. Protoplasmal Johnathan enclothes carnally. Dante circumfuse proscriptively? Murder, Annie Dookhan, and he had to wear it around his neck in their local mall. If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, concerning the abolition of the death penalty, which means body. Weekday conversation framed in california penal code which is about a penalty? Making a difference at WBUR through leadership giving. Death Penalty Appeals and Habeas Proceedings Marquette. This calculator uses an intuitive api for felony like more medical news, california penal code death penalty? Most recent seven years, california penal code or life. The services find it can be charged with ketchup, which one last meal requests an. Alloway was a death penalties are saying is a vehicular assault. Is Perjury A Felony Torrefazionecaffebergamoit. Easily add multiple stops, penalties recognized that it was committed perjury is undergoing life in. Police officer mistakes, DUI serious bodily injury and vehicular homicide. Our lives they were frozen by claims on. Another antique rule provided that elena smelled particularly important issue being accused faces a misdemeanor conviction, please complete this city. Rushford president of new Criminal Justice action Foundation an organization. These provisions in question is given to death penalty? Frankly, but defendants with pending cases at initial time of abolition are still upset for execution and the execution statute is perhaps valid. Penalty of perjury Applicants are also asked to wire an affidavit attesting to the accuracy of the. Fred kills Carl in circumstances that lead to him being convicted of capital murder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance
    Florida State University College of Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Publications 2001 The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance Wayne A. Logan Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Wayne A. Logan, The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance, 62 OHIO ST. L.J. 1409 (2001), Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/196 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 62 Ohio St. L.J. 1409 2001 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Wed Apr 29 13:00:47 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0048-1572 The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance WAYNE A. LOGAN* Although it often escapes attention, municipal governments possess significant authority to enact criminal laws consistent with their expansive home rule and police powers. In this article, Professor Logan explores the numerous ways in which this authority manifests, and reflects upon, several of the main concerns presented by the "shadow criminal law" thereby created.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Cultures of Punishment
    Stanford Law Review Volume 68 May 2016 ARTICLE Two Cultures of Punishment Joshua Kleinfeld* Abstract. As American criminal punishment has become more severe and European more mild, the two systems of punishment have come to represent different cultural possibilities for the modern West. Implicit in American and European punishment are two visions of wrongdoing and wrongdoers, of the terms of the social contract, and of the foundations of rights. American punishment pictures serious offenders as morally deformed people rather than ordinary people who have committed crimes. Their criminality is thus both immutable and devaluing, a feature of the actor rather than merely the act. The forms of punishment deployed in response do not just exact retribution or exert social control, they expressively deny offenders’ claims to membership in the community and to the moral humanity in virtue of which a human being is rights bearing. European criminal punishment expressively denies that any offense marks the offender as a morally deformed person. Criminality is always mutable and never devaluing, actors are kept at a distance from their acts, and the forms of punishment affirm even the worst offenders’ claims to social membership and rights. These conflicting moral visions are not only implicit or immanent in European and American punishment but likely played a role—albeit not an exclusive role—in causing European and American punishment to diverge. After an enormous mid-century crime wave, two very different groups took hold of America’s politics of crime: moralists who viewed criminals as evil and instrumentalists who viewed criminals as dangerous beings. Different as the two groups were, they agreed on policy: for both, the crime problem was a criminals problem, and the solution was to get rid of criminals.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureaucracy and Law a Study of Chinese Criminal Courts and Social Media
    BUREAUCRACY AND LAW A STUDY OF CHINESE CRIMINAL COURTS AND SOCIAL MEDIA A dissertation presented by Yu Zhang to The School of Criminology and Criminal Justice In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Criminology and Criminal Justice Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts August, 2014 1 BUREAUCRACY AND LAW A STUDY OF CHINESE CRIMINAL COURTS AND SOCIAL MEDIA by Yu Zhang ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Criminology and Justice Policy in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University August, 2014 2 Abstract Born in a firmly-rooted bureaucratic society, Chinese judiciary has never gained the opportunity to build its own identity. Concurrently, Chinese people, immersed in a bureaucratic culture, always pin their dream of justice on a powerful bureaucracy rather on a weak judiciary. The current study discusses the thousands years of Chinese history and the significant impact of bureaucracy on Chinese society and courts, and then look into the potential change in a global era revolutionized with technology and internet. A story-telling mode is used to analyze eleven important criminal cases to disclose the operations of criminal courts in China. Large amount of social media data are presented to showcase the dynamic legal community and online activism. We do not know exactly the impact of government monitoring of the social media and it is an open question. Chinese online legal activism derives its methods and vitality from multiple and intersecting forces, including the particular internet transmitting formats, actual contemporary protest forms, incipient public space promotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Justice Under the Sharôñah, Common Law and Civil Law System: Towards a Better Understanding
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law (MJSL) MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF SYARIAH AND LAW VOL.2/2010 ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE UNDER THE SHARÔÑAH, COMMON LAW AND CIVIL LAW SYSTEM: TOWARDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING By: Mashood A. Baderin INTRODUCTION Your Royal Highness, Tunku Ampuan Najihah binti Almarhum Tunku Besar Burhanuddin, Chancellor of the Islamic Science University of Malaysia (USIM) (incidentally, an old SOAS Alumni); The USIM Dean of the Faculty of Syariah and Law, Professor (Dr.) Abdul Samat Musa; Respected Chairman; Learned Members of the Bench and Bar here present; Other Faculty Members and Academic Colleagues here present; Honourable Invited Guests; Students; Ladies and Gentlemen; - Assalaamu Alaykum; Selamat pagi; and Good morning. Please permit to start by expressing my gratefulness to the USIM Faculty of Syariah and Law, for this high academic honour of inviting me to give the 4th prestigious Annual Tuanku Najihah Syariah and Law Lecture this year. I feel highly honoured to be here and I greatly commend your efforts in trying to promote a better understanding of Shar‘ah1 and Law through this annual lecture series. Professor of Law and Head of the School of Law, SOAS, University of London. Email: [email protected] . This is a revised and updated version of the paper delivered by the author at the 4th Tuanku Najihah Syariah and Law Lecture hosted by the Faculty of Syariah and Law, Islamic Science University of Malaysia (USIM) in honour of her Royal Majesty Tuanku Najihah binti Almarhum Tunku Besar Burhanuddin, in Kuala Lumpur on 14th July 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Laws and Ethics of Babylon As Read in Hammurabi's Code (History) T Halwani, M Takrouri
    The Internet Journal of Law, Healthcare and Ethics ISPUB.COM Volume 4 Number 2 Medical laws and ethics of Babylon as read in Hammurabi's code (History) T Halwani, M Takrouri Citation T Halwani, M Takrouri. Medical laws and ethics of Babylon as read in Hammurabi's code (History). The Internet Journal of Law, Healthcare and Ethics. 2006 Volume 4 Number 2. Abstract Background: In principle, the human body represents a forbidden existence in nature, saved and protected against violation which may endanger life. It is in all religions and in man-made ethical and moral code of laws. It allows violating the body integrity in treatment and surgery by consent, on condition that this interference in the human body is limited specifically to those cases that would benefit Health. Hammurabi's Code of Laws was considered the first documented Code ever used by human civilization in Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilization, the land of Assyro-Babylonian culture. We considered to study the text to see the interface between medicine and law in the dawn of civilization. Method: Studying the translated preserved copy of the code and review of literature in Law and medicine to indicate the relevant items which cast a light on the status of law in Ancient civilization of Babylon in Mesopotamia. Results: There were 282 laws, dealing with all aspect of public life, citizen's rights and limits and the Babylon Kingdome's justice system. The following laws are missing: Law numbered (13) and Laws numbered (66-99 inclusive). The Code of Hammurabi described a scaled fee schedule for surgical services, which was linked to the outcome of the surgery so if not met, resulted in severe penalties, required documentation of diseases and therapies, included prescription benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Contracts and the UCC: a Proposal for a Uniform
    Mixed Contracts and the U.C.C.: A Proposal for a Uniform Penalty Default to Protect Consumers By Jesse Brush* Abstract: Although Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code provides a standard set of rules for goods transactions, it is silent on the treatment of mixed goods and services contracts. Without guidance from the Code, courts have taken a number of different approaches to such contracts. These varied tests encourage opportunistic behavior: sellers withhold information about implied warranties during negotiations, and can later claim they do not apply. Uninformed buyers must either forfeit their warranty protection or resort to an expensive court determination of the Code’s applicability. This Article proposes a “penalty default” of applying the Code in consumer contracts that involve both goods and services. The new default rule would induce sellers to provide warranty information to buyers at the time of contracting. When sellers failed to provide information, buyers would receive warranties that sellers could not easily refuse to honor. If states adopted the proposal, therefore, buyers and sellers would decide warranty applicability during negotiations. Consumers would be protected from unbalanced contracts and courts would be relieved of resolving mixed contract warranty disputes. *Yale Law School, Class of 2009. Mixed Contracts 1 Table of Contents Introduction 2 I. Existing Approaches to Mixed Contracts 9 A. Majority Approach: The Predominance Test 11 B. The Component Test 14 C. The Gravamen Test 16 D. U.C.C. Applicability by Analogy: A Policy Approach 19 E. Goods Contracts Only Approach 23 II. Proposal: An Information-Forcing Penalty Default For Mixed Contracts 24 A.
    [Show full text]