INTRODUCTION 1. Bodleian Library, Rawlinson MS.C 155, Fo.327, Thomas Baker to John Lewis. 2. for the Full Titles and Publication

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTRODUCTION 1. Bodleian Library, Rawlinson MS.C 155, Fo.327, Thomas Baker to John Lewis. 2. for the Full Titles and Publication Notes INTRODUCTION 1. Bodleian Library, Rawlinson MS.C 155, fo.327, Thomas Baker to John Lewis. 2. For the full titles and publication details of lives of Fisher, see Con- ventions, pp. x–xv, above. 3. The exception to this pattern is Rouschausse, who devotes more space than other writers to Fisher’s career. 4. Early Life, I pp. 165, 166, Informations B. ‘Informations’ indicates that the source is one of the questionnaires sent out by the biographer. 5. Early Life, II p. 215. 6. Early Life, II p. 213. 7. ‘Observations on the Circumstances which occasioned the Death of Fisher, Bishop of Rochester’, Archaeologia, 25 (1834) 61–99. 8. Foxe, V, p. 99. For Foxe’s allegations of cruelty against Fisher, see Chapter 5, below. 9. Cf. Bradshaw, in Bradshaw and Duffy, pp. 1, 17. 10. God Have Mercy, The Life of John Fisher of Rochester, Ottawa, 1969, especially pp. 22–3. 11. Surts, Works and Days of John Fisher, Cambridge, Mass. 1967; Rex, The Theology of John Fisher, Cambridge, 1991. 12. Initially, Fisher was buried in the graveyard of All-Hallows-By-The- Tower. The Greyfriars Chronicle states that he was disinterred after More’s execution and buried with him in the Tower. Unsubstantiated tradition has it that Margaret Roper obtained custody of both corpses and reburied them in More’s tomb in Chelsea old church. 13. Life of Fisher, p. 254. 14. The oft-quoted story of Fisher’s retreating from his festive household at Christmas in order to pray comes, not from the authentic Early Life, but from Bayly’s embellished version. 15. Early Life, I p. 171, Informations D; I p. 167, Informations B; I p. 268. 1 CAMBRIDGE 1. A.B. Emden, A Biographical Register of the University of Cambridge to 1500, Cambridge, 1963, pp. 229–30; Damian Riehl Leader, A History of the University of Cambridge, Volume 1, The University to 1546, Cam- bridge, 1988, pp. 229–30. 2. Early Life, I p. 162, Informations A. 3. PRO, SP1/239, fos 223–24 (L & P, Add. App. I i, no. 1024), John Bouge to Katherine Mann, 1535. 4. Translated in Bridgett, Life of Fisher, p. 12. 177 178 Notes 5. William Melton, Sermo exhortatorius, London, c.1510. 6. Testamenta Eboracensia, vol. 5, Surtees Society, London and Edinburgh, 1884, pp. 251–2. 7. A.E. Stamp, Michaelhouse, London, 1924, pp. 50, 35–7. There are similar foundations by Robert Doket and Dame Joan Rokeby of Beverley. 8. Early Life, I p. 208. 9. Early Life, II p. 129. 10. Michael K. Jones and Malcolm Underwood. The King’s Mother: Lady Margaret Beaufort, Countess of Richmond and Derby, Cambridge, 1992, p. 214. 11. W.G. Searle, History of the Queens’ College, 2 vols, Cambridge, 1867– 71, I pp. 133–4; Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, p. 214. The fellows’ letter to Wilkinson is printed in Lewis, Life of Dr Fisher, II p. 260. 12. John Twigg, A History of the Queens’ College, 1448–1986, Woodbridge, 1987, pp. 18–19; Fisher’s itinerary, in Bradshaw and Duffy, pp. 236–7. 13. For examples, BL, Harleian MS 7048, fos 9v–10, 10v–11. 14. CUL, QC Bk I, ‘Journale’ of Queens’ College, Book I fo.286v. 15. Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, p. 215. 16. Bodleian Library, Rawlinson MS. C 155, fo.316v. For other correspon- dence relating to Fisher’s resignation and his succession by Robert Bekensaw, ibid. fos 316, 317; also in BL, Harleian MS. 7048, fos 11v–13. 17. Grace Book B, Part I, 1488–1511, ed. Mary Bateson, Cambridge Anti- quarian Society, Cambridge, 1903, p. 168. 18. Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, pp. 257 and 249, this last quoting Fisher’s work against Oecolampadius of 1527. 19. SJC, D91.20, fo.179. 20. The Eagle, XVI no. 93 (Dec.1890), 6, Hornby to Fisher; Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, p. 249; Reynolds, Life of Fisher, pp. 145–6; BL, Additional MS. 12,060, fos 20v–21. 21. Erasmi Epistolae, no. 3036. 22. Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, pp. 205, 167–70. 23. SJC, D91.20, fos 37, 46, 147 (account of Margaret’s cofferer); Leader, Cambridge, pp. 276–7; Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, pp. 206–9. 24. Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, pp. 210–11; Leader, Cam- bridge, p. 281. 25. The King’s Mother, pp. 223, 224 and n., 227. 26. CUL, MM2, fos 47v–8. 27. CUL, MM2, fo.36. 28. The Eagle, XVI no. 93 (Dec. 1890), 8–9. 29. CUL, MM24, fos 36v, 48v–9. 30. SJC, D94.507, Sharpe to Metcalfe; CUL, MMv 47, fos 29, 35, 35v, payments for Fisher’s anniversary; Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, p. 227. 31. Early Life, I p. 241, editor’s note. 32. SJC, C7.11, fos 38–40. Printed in Fisher, Funeral Sermon of Lady Margaret, ed. J. Hymers, Cambridge, 1840, pp. 195–203 and in The Eagle, XXXVII no. 138 (Dec. 1905), 8–12. Notes 179 33. Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, p. 235. 34. The Eagle, XVI no. 9 (Dec. 1890), 3–4. 35. The Eagle, XVI no. 9 (Dec. 1890), 2; Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, pp. 243–4. 36. The King’s Mother, pp. 241–7. 37. SJC, D106.3, fo.11. 38. SJC, D106.11, fo.43; cf. The Eagle, XXXI no. 152 (June 1910), 328. 39. SJC, D106.11, fos 107, 119, 136v, 144, 16. 40. SJC, C7.11, fo.200; SJC, C7.2, fos 43–5. For Katherine of Aragon, Maria Dowling, Humanism in the Age of Henry VIII, London, 1986, pp. 25, 26. 41. Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, p. 247. 42. I am grateful to Malcolm Underwood, who is working on the early benefactors of St John’s, for confirmation of this point. 43. The whole quarrel is summarised by Underwood, ‘John Fisher and the Promotion of Learning’, in Bradshaw and Duffy, pp. 38–9; Fisher’s letter to Croke is printed in Hymers, Funeral Sermon, pp. 210–16. 44. Early Statutes of the College of St John the Evangelist, ed. J.E.B. Mayor, Cambridge, 1859, pp. 238–44; trans. Bridgett, Life of Fisher, pp. 32–4. 45. SJC, C7.2, fos 208–219. 46. Early Statutes of Christ’s College, Cambridge, ed. H. Rackham, Lon- don, 1927. 47. Quoted in John Peile, Christ’s College, London, 1900, p. 1. 48. See note 44, above. 49. Early Life, I p. 244. 50. Early Life, II p. 168. The anonymous author may have been a St John’s man. 51. Early Life, I p. 166, Informations B. Edward Plankney and the more famous Richard Morison were scholar-clients of Cromwell. 52. Thomas Baker, History of the College of St John the Evangelist, Cam- bridge, ed. J.E.B. Mayor, 2 vols, Cambridge, 1869, I document 89. 53. Early Life, I p. 165, Informations B. 54. SJC, D106.4, fos 16, 32v, 33v, 40, 45, 51v, 63. 55. Early Life, I p. 165, Informations B. 56. Bodleian Library, Rawlinson MS. C 155, fos 328v, 329, Baker-Lewis correspondence. 57. Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, p. 235 and note. 58. Jones and Underwood, The King’s Mother, pp. 246, 247. 59. SJC, C7.2, fos 43–5. 60. Cf. Leader, Cambridge, p. 313. For references to receipt of rent for Linacre’s London house, pensions and rewards to his sisters, and Day’s wages as Linacre reader, SJC, D106.11, passim. 61. Paul Lawrence Rose, ‘Erasmians and Mathematicians at Cambridge in the Early Sixteenth Century’, Sixteenth Century Journal, 8 no. 2 (1977), 47ff.; Leader, Cambridge, pp. 311–12. 62. For example, SJC, D106.11, fos 72v, 78, 117. 63. Mayor, Early Statutes, pp. 104–16, 119, 244, 245, 250, 251, 311–13, 375–6. 64. Erasmi Epistolae, no. 948. For Fox and Corpus Christi, Dowling, Hu- manism, pp. 27–32. 180 Notes 65. SJC, D106.4, fos 1, 2, 1v. 66. SJC, D106.11, fo.141; D57.33, fos 1v, 2v; D106.6, fos 40v, 45, 46, 46v, 49, 52, 54, 55. 67. David McKitterick, ‘Two sixteenth-century catalogues of St John’s College library’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, VII part 2 (1978), 139; Emden, Cambridge to 1500, pp. 229–300. 68. The Eagle, VIII no. 100 (March 1893), 11, 12. 69. Reynolds, Life of Fisher, p. 3. 70. Dowling, Humanism, p. 116. 71. Lawrence V. Ryan, Roger Ascham, Oxford, 1963, p. 29; SJC, C7.2, fos 65–7v, 69, 255. Watson it was who preserved Fisher’s statute book for St John’s from destruction; Early Life, II pp. 134–5. 72. The Eagle, XVI no. 93 (Dec. 1880), 7–8. 73. SJC, D56.9, D56.15, D56.25. 74. Miscellaneous Writings and Letters of Thomas Cranmer, ed. J.E. Cox, Parker Society, Cambridge, 1846, p. 279. 75. The Eagle, XXXII no. 154 (March 1911), 392–3. 76. Venn, Alumni Cantabrigienses, vol. 3 p. 346. 77. Lewis, Life of Dr Fisher, I p. 54. 78. Early Life, II pp. 133–35 for the delegation to the Tower; this account is corrected by the editor’s note. For payments for Fisher, SJC, D106.11, fos 155v–61. 79. Lewis, Life of Dr Fisher, II pp. 147–50. 80. Grace Book B, p. 250 for gifts from the university to Fisher in 1510– 11. Letters concerning the chancellorship in 1514 are in Original Let- ters Illustrative of English History, ed. Sir Henry Ellis, 3rd series, vol. I (London, 1846), pp.
Recommended publications
  • 'The Publishers of the 1723 Book of Constitutions', AQC 121 (2008)
    The Publishers of the 1723 Book of Constitutions Andrew Prescott he advertisements in the issue of the London newspaper, The Evening Post, for 23 February 1723 were mostly for recently published books, including a new edition of the celebrated directory originally compiled by John Chamberlayne, Magnae Britanniae Notitia, and books offering a new cure for scurvy and advice Tfor those with consumption. Among the advertisements for new books in The Evening Post of 23 February 1723 was the following: This Day is publiſh’d, † || § The CONSTITUTIONS of the FREE- MASONS, containing the Hiſtory, Charges, Regulations, &c., of that moſt Ancient and Right Worſhipful Fraternity, for the Uſe of the Lodges. Dedicated to his Grace the Duke of Montagu the laſt Grand Maſter, by Order of his Grace the Duke of Wharton, the preſent Grand Maſter, Authoriz’d by the Grand Lodge of Maſters and War- dens at the Quarterly Communication. Ordered to be publiſh’d and recommended to the Brethren by the Grand Maſter and his Deputy. Printed for J. Senex, and J. Hooke, both over againſt St Dunſtan’s Church, Fleet-ſtreet. An advertisement in similar terms, also stating that the Constitutions had been pub- lished ‘that day’, appeared in The Post Boy of 26 February, 5 March and 12 March 1723 Volume 121, 2008 147 Andrew J. Prescott and TheLondon Journal of 9 March and 16 March 1723. The advertisement (modified to ‘just publish’d’) continued to appear in The London Journal until 13 April 1723. The publication of The Constitutions of the Free-Masons, or the Book of Constitutions as it has become generally known, was a fundamental event in the development of Grand Lodge Freemasonry, and the book remains an indispensable source for the investigation of the growth of Freemasonry in the first half of the eighteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • King John in Fact and Fiction
    W-i".- UNIVERSITY OF PENNS^XVANIA KING JOHN IN FACT AND FICTION BY RUTH WALLERSTEIN ff DA 208 .W3 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LIBRARY ''Ott'.y^ y ..,. ^..ytmff^^Ji UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA KING JOHN IN FACT AND FICTION BY RUTH WAIXE510TFIN. A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GiLA.DUATE SCHOOL IN PARTLVL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 'B J <^n5w Introductory LITTLE less than one hundred years after the death of King John, a Scottish Prince John changed his name, upon his accession to L the and at the request of his nobles, A throne to avoid the ill omen which darkened the name of the English king and of John of France. A century and a half later, King John of England was presented in the first English historical play as the earliest English champion and martyr of that Protestant religion to which the spectators had newly come. The interpretation which thus depicted him influenced in Shakespeare's play, at once the greatest literary presentation of King John and the source of much of our common knowledge of English history. In spite of this, how- ever, the idea of John now in the mind of the person who is no student of history is nearer to the conception upon which the old Scotch nobles acted. According to this idea, John is weak, licentious, and vicious, a traitor, usurper and murderer, an excommunicated man, who was com- pelled by his oppressed barons, with the Archbishop of Canterbury at their head, to sign Magna Charta.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv2w736 Author Harkins, Robert Lee Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midwives of Seventeenth-Century London
    The Midwives of Seventeenth-Century London DOREEN EVENDEN Mount Saint Vincent University published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb22ru, uk http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de AlarcoÂn 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain q Doreen Evenden 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United States of America bv Typeface Bembo 10/12 pt. System DeskTopPro/ux [ ] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data Evenden, Doreen. The midwives of seventeenth-century London / Doreen Evenden. p. cm. ± (Cambridge studies in the history of medicine) Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-521-66107-2 (hc) 1. Midwives ± England ± London ± History ± 17th century. 2. Obstetrics ± England ± London ± History ± 17th century. 3. Obstetricians ± England ± London ± History ± 17th century. 4. n-uk-en. I. Title. II. Series. rg950.e94 1999 618.2©09421©09032 ± dc21 99-26518 cip isbn 0 521 66107 2 hardback CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures page xiii Acknowledgements xv List of Abbreviations xvii Introduction 1 Early Modern Midwifery Texts 6 The Subjects of the Study 13 Sources and Methodology 17 1 Ecclesiastical Licensing of Midwives 24 Origins of Licensing 25 Oaths and Articles Relating to the Midwife's Of®ce 27 Midwives and the Churching Ritual 31 Acquiring a Licence 34 Midwives at Visitations 42 2 Pre-Licensed Experience 50 Length of Experience 50 Deputy Midwives 54 Matrilineal Midwifery Links 59 Senior Midwives 62 Midwives' Referees 65 Competence vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architects of Eighteenth Century English Freemasonry, 1720 – 1740
    The Architects of Eighteenth Century English Freemasonry, 1720 – 1740 Submitted by Richard Andrew Berman to the University of Exeter as a Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Research in History 15 December 2010. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis that is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. R A Berman 1 | P a g e Abstract Following the appointment of its first aristocratic Grand Masters in the 1720s and in the wake of its connections to the scientific Enlightenment, ‘Free and Accepted’ Masonry rapidly became part of Britain’s national profile and the largest and arguably the most influential of Britain’s extensive clubs and societies. The new organisation did not evolve naturally from the mediaeval guilds and religious orders that pre-dated it, but was reconfigured radically by a largely self-appointed inner core. Freemasonry became a vehicle for the expression and transmission of the political and religious views of those at its centre, and for the scientific Enlightenment concepts that they championed. The ‘Craft’ also offered a channel through which many sought to realise personal aspirations: social, intellectual and financial. Through an examination of relevant primary and secondary documentary evidence, this thesis seeks to contribute to a broader understanding of contemporary English political and social culture, and to explore the manner in which Freemasonry became a mechanism that promoted the interests of the Hanoverian establishment and connected and bound a number of élite metropolitan and provincial figures.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostolic Succession of the Right Rev. James Michael St. George
    The Apostolic Succession of The Right Rev. James Michael St. George © Copyright 2014-2015, The International Old Catholic Churches, Inc. 1 Table of Contents Certificates ....................................................................................................................................................4 ......................................................................................................................................................................5 Photos ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Lines of Succession........................................................................................................................................7 Succession from the Chaldean Catholic Church .......................................................................................7 Succession from the Syrian-Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch..............................................................10 The Coptic Orthodox Succession ............................................................................................................16 Succession from the Russian Orthodox Church......................................................................................20 Succession from the Melkite-Greek Patriarchate of Antioch and all East..............................................27 Duarte Costa Succession – Roman Catholic Succession .........................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • 51St International Congress on Medieval Studies
    51st lntemational Congress on Medieval Studies May 12-15,2016 51st International Congress on Medieval Studies May 12–15, 2016 Medieval Institute College of Arts and Sciences Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5432 wmich.edu/medieval 2016 Table of Contents Welcome Letter iii Registration iv-v On-Campus Housing vi Off-Campus Accommodations vii Travel viii Driving and Parking ix Food x-xi Campus Shuttles xii Construction xiii Hotel Shuttles xiv Hotel Shuttle Schedules xv Facilities xvi Logistics xvii Varia xviii Lecture/Performance xix Exhibits Hall xx Exhibitors xxi Plenary Lectures xxii Advance Notice—2017 Congress xxiii The Congress: How It Works xxiv Travel Awards xxv Richard Rawlinson Center xxvi Center for Cistercian and Monastic Studies xxvii M.A. Program in Medieval Studies xxviii Medieval Institute Affiliated Faculty xxix Medieval Institute Publications xxx–xxxi About Western Michigan University xxxii Endowment and Gift Funds xxxiii The Otto Gründler Book Prize xxxiv 2016 Congress Schedule of Events 1–175 Index of Sponsoring Organizations 177–183 Index of Participants 185–205 List of Advertisers A-1 Advertising A-2 – A-48 Maps M-1 – M-7 ii The Medieval Institute College of Arts and Sciences Dear Colleague, Summer passed with the Call for Papers; fall came with a change of colors to Kalamazoo and the organization of sessions; we are now in winter here at Western Michigan University, starting to look forward to the spring and the arrival of you, our fellow medievalists, to the 51st International Congress on Medieval Studies. The Valley III cafeteria and adjoining rooms will host booksellers and vendors; cafeteria meals will be served in Valley II’s dining hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Rawlinson's Proposed History of Oxfordshire
    Rawlinson's Proposed History of Oxfordshire By B. J. ENRIGHT INthe English Topographer, published in 1720, Richard Rawlinson described the manuscript and printed sources from which a history of Oxfordshire might be compiled and declared regretfully, ' of this County .. we have as yet no perfect Description.' He hastened to add in that mysteriously weH­ informed manner which invariably betokened reference to his own activities: But of this County there has been, for some Years past, a Description under Consideration, and great Materials have been collected, many Plates engraved, an actual Survey taken, and Quaeries publish'd and dispers'd over the County, to shew the Nature of the Design, as well to procure Informations from the Gentry and others, which have, in some measure, answer'd the Design, and encouraged the Undertaker to pursue it with all convenient Speed. In this Work will be included the Antiquities of the Town and City of Oxford, which Mr. Anthony d l-Vood, in Page 28 of his second Volume of Athenae Oxonienses, &c. promised, and has since been faithfully transcribed from his Papers, as well as very much enJarg'd and corrected from antient Original Authorities. I At a time when antiquarian studies were rapidly losing their appeal after the halcyon days of the 17th-century,' this attempt to compile a large-scale history of a county which had received so little attention caUs for investigation. In proposing to publish a history of Oxfordshirc at this time, Rawlinson was being far less unrealistic thall might at first appear. For
    [Show full text]
  • C.1530 Sarah Raskin
    False Oaths The Silent Alliance between Church and Heretics in England, c.1400-c.1530 Sarah Raskin Submitted in partial fulFillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Sarah Raskin All rights reserved ABSTRACT False Oaths: The Silent Alliance between Church and Heretics in England, c. 1400-1530 Sarah Raskin This dissertation re-examines trials for heresy in England from 1382, which saw the First major action directed at the WyclifFite heresy in Oxford, and the early Reformation period, with an emphasis on abjurations, the oaths renouncing heretical beliefs that suspects were required to swear after their interrogations were concluded. It draws a direct link between the customs that developed around the ceremony of abjuration and the exceptionally low rate of execution for “relapsed” and “obstinate” heretics in England, compared to other major European anti-heresy campaigns of the period. Several cases are analyzed in which heretics who should have been executed, according to the letter and intention of canon law on the subject, were permitted to abjure, sometimes repeatedly. Other cases ended in execution despite intense efforts by the presiding bishop to obtain a similarly law-bending abjuration. All these cases are situated in the context of the constitutions governing heresy trials as well as a survey of the theology and cultural standing of oaths within both WyclifFism and the broader Late Medieval and Early Modern world. This dissertation traces how Lollard heretics gradually accepted the necessity of false abjuration as one of a number of measures to preserve their lives and their movement, and how early adopters using coded writing carefully persuaded their co-religionists of this necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Meres' Rendering of Luis De Granada's Guía De Pecadores
    DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOLOGÍAS INGLESA Y ALEMANA FACULTAD FILOSOFÍA Y LETRAS PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO LENGUAS, TEXTOS Y CONTEXTOS Translation, Anglo-Hispanic Relations and Devotional Prose in the Renaissance: Francis Meres’ Rendering of Luis de Granada’s Guía de Pecadores Miriam Castillo Arroyo Supervised by Dr. José María Pérez Fernández (University of Granada) Dr. Andrew Hadfield (University of Sussex) Granada, 2018 Editor: Universidad de Granada. Tesis Doctorales Autor: Miriam Castillo Arroyo ISBN: 978-84-1306-023-1 URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/54069 CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………... 1-19 CHAPTER 1. Luis de Granada and Francis Meres, A Common European Context………………………………………………………. 20-79 1.1 European Conflicts…………………………………………………… 20-26 1.1.1. Devotio Moderna…………………………………………. 26-32 1.1.2. The Bible and its Interpretation…………………………... 32-36 1.2 The European Book Market………………………………………….. 36-79 1.2.1 Material analysis of books………………………………... 42-62 1.2.2 State control, censorship and the legal conditions for book production………………………………………………………... 62-66 1.2.3 Spain and the Index………………………………………. 66-73 1.2.4 England; Decrees and Royal Proclamations……………... 73-79 CHAPTER 2. Early Modern Translation; theory and practice……... 80-128 2.1 Conflicting perspectives in translation theory……………………….. 80-102 2.2 Treatises on translation theory……………………………………….. 103-111 2.3 The role of the translator……………………………………………... 111-121 2.4 English Renaissance Translation…………………………………….. 121-128 CHAPTER 3. The authors……………………………………………... 129-191 3.1 Luis de Granada, a Dominican preacher……………………………... 129-140 3.1.1 Guía de pecadores 1556/7 and 1567……………………... 136-140 3.2 Francis Meres, an Anglican priest…………………………………… 140-191 3.2.1 The Practice of Commonplacing………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Death of Sir Thomas More, Knight by Nicholas Harpsfield
    The Life and Death of Sir Thomas More, Knight by Nicholas Harpsfield icholas Harpsfield (1519–1575) com- Clements, and the Rastells. With Mary’s ac- Npleted this biography ca. 1557, during cession to the throne in 1553, he returned and the reign of Queen Mary, but it was not pub- became archdeacon of Canterbury and worked lished until 1932. Indebted to William Rop- closely with Cardinal Reginald Pole, the Arch- er’s recollections, Harpsfield’s Life presents bishop of Canterbury. With Mary’s and Pole’s More as both a spiritual and secular figure, and deaths in 1558, and with his refusal to take the Harpsfield dedicates his biography to William oath recognizing Queen Elizabeth’s suprem- Roper, presenting More as the first English acy, Harpsfield was imprisoned from 1559 to martyr among the laity, who serves as an “am- 1574 in Fleet Prison where, as he relates in his bassador” and “messenger” to them. Dedicatory Epistle, William Roper supported Harpsfield was born in London, and was ed- him generously. ucated at Winchester and then New College This edition of Harpsfield’s Life is based on at Oxford where he became a perpetual fellow the critical edition published for the Early En- and eventually earned a doctorate in canon glish Text Society (EETS) in 1932 by Oxford law. In 1550, during the reign of Edward VI, University Press, edited by E. V. Hitchcock; he moved to Louvain and come to know many the cross-references in the headnotes refer to in the More circle such as Antonio Bonvisi, the this edition.
    [Show full text]