Military Simulator Census 2014 Flightglobal Insight | 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Military Simulator Census 2014 Flightglobal Insight | 3 IN ASSOCIATION WITH SPECIAL REPORT MILITARY SIMULATOR CENSUS 2014 Flightglobal Insight | 3 Flightglobal_Partner of Choice_Oct2014_AM310.indd 1 2014-10-28 8:37 AM MILITARY SIMULATOR CENSUS 2014 CONTENTS ABBREViaTIONS 4Mil 16 Indonesia 22 ANALYSIS 5Mitsubishi 17 Iran 22 NH Industries 17 Iraq 22 CENSUS BY aiRCRAFT MANUfacTURER Northrop Grumman 17 Israel 22 Aero Vodochody 7 Panavia 17 Italy 23 AgustaWestland 7 Pilatus 17 Japan 23 AIDC 7PZL 17 Jordan 23 Airbus Military 7 Raytheon 18 Kuwait 23 Alenia Aermacchi 8 Saab 18 Malaysia 23 AMX International 8 SEPECAT 18 Mexico 23 Antonov 8 Shenyang 18 Morocco 24 BAE Systems 8 Sikorsky 18 Myanmar 24 Beechcraft 8 Sukhoi 19 Netherlands 24 Bell 9 Transall 19 New Zealand 24 Bell Boeing 10 Tupolev 19 Nigeria 24 Boeing 10 Westland 19 Norway 24 Boeing Vertol 12 Oman 24 Boeing/BAS Systems 12 CENSUS BY OPERATOR COUNTRY Pakistan 24 Chengdu Aviation/Pakistan Aeronautical Complex 12 Algeria 20 Peru 24 CASA 12 Argentina 20 Poland 24 Dassault 12 Australia 20 Portugal 24 Dassault/Dornier 13 Austria 20 Qatar 24 Dassault-Breguet 13 Bahrain 20 Romania 24 Douglas 13 Belgium 20 Russia 24 Embraer 13 Brazil 20 Saudi Arabia 25 Enstrom 13 Brunei 20 Singapore 25 Eurocopter 13 Canada 20 Slovakia 25 Eurofighter 14 Chile 21 South Africa 25 Fairchild Republic 14 Colombia 21 South Korea 25 Hawker Beechcraft 14 Croatia 21 Spain 25 Hindustan Aeronautics 14 Czech Republic 21 Sudan 26 Hongdu 14 Denmark 21 Switzerland 26 IAR 14 Ecuador 21 Taiwan 26 Israel Aerospace Industries 14 Egypt 21 Thailand 26 Korea Aerospace Industries 14 Finland 21 Tunisia 26 Kaman 14 France 21 Turkey 26 Kawasaki Heavy Industries 14 Germany 22 UAE 26 Lockheed Martin 14 Greece 22 UK 26 Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm 16 Hungary 22 USA 27 Mikoyan 16 India 22 Uzbekistan 30 The information contained in our databases and used in this presentation has been assembled from many sources, and whilst reasonable care has been taken to ensure accuracy, the information is supplied on the understanding that no legal liability whatsoever shall attach to Flightglobal, its offices, or employees in respect of any error or omission that may have occurred. © 2014 Flightglobal, part oF reed business inFormation ltd. Flightglobal Insight | 3 MILITARY SIMULATOR CENSUS 2014 ABBREVIATIONS DEVICES ACES Aerial Combat Engagement Simulator OFT Operational Flight Trainer APT Advanced Pilot Training OMS Operational Mission Simulator ATD Aviation Training Device PCT Procedures Crew Trainer CDS Cockpit Dynamic Simulator PTT Part Task Trainer CFTD Containerized Flight Training Device RCPT Reconfigurable Cockpit Procedures Trainer CMS Combat Mission Simulator RCT Rear Crew Trainer CPT Cockpit Procedure Trainer SIL System Integration lab CT/IPS Cockpit Trainers/Interactive Pilot Stations TFPS Transportable Flight Proficiency Simulator DMRT Deployable Mission Rehearsal Trainers TFTD Tactical Flight Training Device DMS Dynamic Mission Simulator TOFT Tactical Operational Flight Trainer DTT Desk Top Trainer TPT Troop Proficiency Trainer FBS Fixed-Base Simulator ULT Unit Level Trainer FDS Flight Dynamics Simulator UMT Unmanned Mission Trainer FFMS Full Flight Mission Simulator UTD Unit Training Device FFS Full Flight Simulator VST Virtual Sensor Trainer FMFS Full Mission Flight Simulator WST Weapon Systems Trainer FMFT Full Mission Flight Trainer WTT Weapon Tactics Trainer FMS Full Mission Simulator FMST Flight Management System Trainer FMT Full Mission Trainer FNPT Flight & Navigation Procedures Trainer FPT Flat Panel Trainer FTD Flight Training Device FTS Flight Training Services HAWST Helicopter Aircrew Weapon Systems Trainer IFS Integrated Flight Simulation/Initial Flight Training IFT Instrument Flight Trainer TRAINING LOcaTIONS IPT Integrated Procedures Trainer LCT Longbow Crew Trainer AFB Air Force Base MPT Maritime Professional Training ANGB Air National Guard Base MS Military Simulator MCAS Marine Corps Air Station MSDT Mission Systems Desktop Trainer MCB Marine Cops Base MTT Military Training Technology NAS Naval Air Station 4 | Flightglobal Insight Flightglobal Insight | 5 MILITARY SIMULATOR CENSUS 2014 ANALYSIS The information in this year’s Census was provided MARKET SHARE BY MILITARY SIMULATOR MANUfacTURER by the leading simulator manufacturers. The updated L-3 Link Simulation information now reveals that there are close to 2,000 Other & Training 25% military aircraft simulators currently in operation. 24% A total of 75% of the world’s simulators in the defence sector are made by five manufacturers. l-3 link simulation & training, a division of l-3 Communications, leads the military market with a 24% share of active simulators. Thales boeing follows with a 16% share while Canada-based Cae 10% Boeing – the leading manufacturer in the civil market – is featured in 16% third place with a share of 13% of devices. Fsi and thales follow with market shares of 11% and 10% respectively FSI while the remaining 25% of the market is made up of other 11% CAE manufacturers. 13% MILITARY SIMULATOR SHARE BY AIRCRAFT MANUfacTURER Boeing is the leading manufacturer of aircraft that have simulators, with 23% of the market, followed by lockheed Boeing Martin and Beechcraft with shares of 18% and 9% 23% respectively. helicopter manufacturers sikorsky and bell Other follow with shares of 5% each while the remaining share of 41% manufacturers account for 41%. In terms of aircraft types, there are more than 200 Lockheed martin F-16 simulators – 11% of the market – with the Lockheed beechcraft t-6 texan ii training aircraft being the next most Martin 18% in use. the special mission boeing p-8a poseidon and the combat F/a-18 hornet and F-15 eagle all have a 4% Bell market share. most of the transport/tanker simulators are 5% Sikorsky Beechcraft for the lockheed martin C-130 hercules and C-130J super 5% 9% hercules. the majority of the simulated helicopter types are the boeing ah-64 apache longbow and the sikorsky sh-60 MILITARY SIMULATOR SHARE BY AIRCRAFT TYPE seahawk, which have shares of 8% and 7% respectively. F-16 Fighting Falcon Combat aircraft simulators account for 34% of the market 11% while helicopter simulators total 31%. training aircraft, special T-6 Texan II 6% mission and transports/tankers account for 14%, 12% and 8% respectively. uaV simulators currently represent only P-8A Poseidon 4% 1% of the share of military simulators. F/A-18 Hornet 4% The USA is where 62% of the world’s aircraft military F-15 Eagle simulators are based, with more than 1,200 devices. the 4% US Air Force alone operates 569 simulators, a market share of 46% of the simulators within the USA, and a share of 29% Other 71% of the world’s military simulators. the us navy, army and marine Corps have a share of 26%, 22% and 5% respectively in the usa. 4 | Flightglobal Insight Flightglobal Insight | 5 MILITARY SIMULATOR CENSUS 2014 MILITARY SIMULATOR SHARE BY AIRCRAFT CATEGORY MILITARY SIMULATOR SHARE BY COUNTRY Transports UAV /tankers 1% Other 8% 26% Special Combat mission aircraft 12% 34% Canada 2% USA 62% Training Germany aircraft 3% 14% UK 3% France Helicopter 4% 31% MILITARY SIMULATOR SHARE BY DEVICE TYPE France accounts for a share of 4% while the UK and Germany FTD 12% have 3% each. Canada has a share of 2% while the balance of 26% of simulators is located in other countries. FFS 11% Flight training devices (FTD) account for 12% of all military Other simulators, followed by full flight simulators (FFs) with 11%. 52% operational flight trainers (oFt) and full mission simulators OFT (FMS) both have a share of 10% each while weapon systems 10% trainers (Wst) account for 5%. FMS 10% WST 5% 6 | Flightglobal Insight Flightglobal Insight | 7 MILITARY SIMULATOR CENSUS 2014 CENSUS BY AIRCRAFT TYPE OPERATOR TRAINING LOCATION SIM MANUfacTURER QTY SIM TYPE DEVICEVISUAL DISPLAY ENTRY Aero VODOCHODY L-159 Aero Vodochody E-COM 1 L-159B FMS 220° x 150° Czech Republic Air Force Flight Training E-COM 1 L-159 FMS 200° x 100°/6ch Czech Republic Air Force Flight Training Virtual Reality Media 1 L-159A FMS 200° x 100°/6ch Aero VODOCHODY L-39 Nigeria Air Force Flight Training ULS Letov Simulatory 1 L-39ZA FFS Russian Air Force Flight Training Armavir Dinamika 1 L-39 FMS Russian Navy Flight Training Dinamika 1 L-39 FMS Aero VODOCHODY L-59 Egypt Air Force Flight Training ULS Letov Simulatory 1 L-59E FMS Tunisia Air Force Flight Training ULS Letov Simulatory 1 L-59T FMS AgustaWESTLAND AB205 Italy Air Force Flight Training CAE 2 UH-1 OFT Vital IV/5W 1981 Italy Army Flight Training CAE 2 UH-1 FFS Maxvue Enhanced A+ FP2 1981 Morocco Air Force Flight Training CAE 1 UH-1 OFT Vital III-S 1981 AgustaWESTLAND AW101 AgustaWestland Atlantis Aerospace 1 AW101 IDS CPT SimFusion/X-IG Italy Army Flight Training AgustaWestland 1 Joint Supporter CPT Italy Navy Flight Training CAE 1 AW101 FMFS Medallion 2011 Italy Navy Flight Training CAE 1 AW101 RCT Medallion 2011 UK Royal Air Force Flight Training CAE 2 AW101 FMS Harmony 1/210° 2000 UK Royal Navy Flight Training CAE 1 AW101 CDS MaxVue/Dome/8 Channels UK Royal Navy Flight Training CAE 1 AW101 FMS MaxVue/7 Channels 1998 UK Royal Navy Flight Training CAE 3 AW101 OFT 1998 AgustaWESTLAND AW109 Belgium Army Flight Training CAE 1 AW109 OFT PT2000/150° 1995 Belgium Army Flight Training Belgium Thales 1 A109 B1 SpaceMagic Italy Air Force Flight Training AgustaWestland 1 AW109 FFS 2010 Rotorsim CAE 1 AW109 FMS Medallion-S/5 Channels 2004 Rotorsim CAE 1 AW109 FMS Medallion-S/200 x 60/5 Channels 2006 Rotorsim CAE 1 AW109 FMS Medallion-S/5 Channels 2007 AgustaWESTLAND AW129 Italy Army Flight Training AgustaWestland 1
Recommended publications
  • Cockpit Juni 2011 Als PDF Herunterladen
    Das Schweizer Luftfahrt-Magazin Nr. 06/Juni 2011 CHF 8.20 / € 5.50 Virtual Swiss Air Force Cover Story AERO 2011 – Fliegen wir in Zukunft «elektrisch»? Military Aviation Civil Aviation Helicopter Stealth-Heli auf 75 Jahre SKYe SH09 –Schweizer Terroristenjagd Aer Lingus Heli der Extraklasse real watches for real people Oris Swiss Hunter Team PS Edition Automatik-Werk Datumsanzeige Verschraubte Krone Wasserdicht bis 10 bar/100 m www.oris.ch Cockpit 06 2011 Editorial 3 Take-off Liebe Leserinnen und Leser «Ohne Flugplätze kein Luftverkehr!» heisst der dem seit Anfang Jahr eingeführten «Landefranken» tragen auch die Flug- eingängige Slogan des Verbandes Schweizer Flug- platznutzer einen kleinen Beitrag dazu bei, dass die VSF-Vertreter fach- plätze. Diese vier Worte bringen es auf den Punkt. lich und zeitgerecht den Regulierern in Brüssel und Köln auf Augenhöhe Flugplätze, ob klein oder gross, haben oft eine lange begegnen können. Piloten und Flugplatzbetreiber sitzen in einem Boot Tradition. Über Jahrzehnte hinweg dienten sie der – ganz im Sinne des Slogans «Ohne Flugplätze kein Luftverkehr!» Le- Schulung, dem Geschäfts- und Linienverkehr oder sen Sie bitte dazu den Beitrag des Geschäftsführers des VSF, Dr. Pierre dem fliegerischen Freizeitvergnügen. An Flugplät- Moreillon (Seite 26). zen entstanden Wartungs- und Zulieferbetriebe, Anfang Mai ist Cockpit mit dem VSF eine Zusammenarbeit eingegangen. Restaurants und Hotels, Flugschulen und Charter- Monatlich wird der Verband über die wichtigsten und dringlichsten An- betriebe. Und in der Folge weitere Unternehmungen, deren Wertschöpfung liegen berichten. Aktuell und umfassend informiert auch die VSF-Website aus der Luftfahrt stammt. Kurz: Arbeitsplätze, Steuerzahler. aerodromes.ch. Hier finden Sie alles, was zum Thema von Relevanz ist.
    [Show full text]
  • Metodi E Modelli Di Pianificazione E Progettazione Eliportuale Per Servizi Di Trasporto Civile
    Metodi e modelli di pianificazione e progettazione eliportuale per servizi di trasporto civile Luigi Maritano Corso di Dottorato in Tecnica ed Economia dei Trasporti XXIV Ciclo Tutor: Prof. Ing. Salvatore Amoroso Coordinatore: Prof. Ing. Marco Migliore UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PALERMO FACOLTA’ DI INGEGNERIA Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali (D.I.C.A.M.) In copertina: Artist Rendering of the Air Pegasus Metro Heliplex heliport http://ironboundnewark.com/we-fly-high-newark-heliportheliplex UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PALERMO FACOLTÀ DI INGEGNERIA Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali Corso di Dottorato di Ricerca in Tecnica ed Economia dei Trasporti – XXIV Ciclo S.S.D. ICAR/05 Metodi e modelli di pianificazione e progettazione eliportuale per servizi di trasporto civile Tesi di dottorato di: Tutor: Luigi Maritano Prof. Ing. Salvatore Amoroso Coordinatore del Corso: Prof. Ing. Marco Migliore INDICE GENERALE INDICE GENERALE ................................................................................................. pagina I INDICE DELLE FIGURE E DELLE TABELLE ................................................................ V INTRODUZIONE ................................................................................................................. 1 CAPITOLO 1 - L’impiego civile dell’elicottero: considerazioni di carattere generale e analisi del contesto nazionale ed internazionale Premessa ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report
    Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport (MSP) 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report Comparison of the 2020 Actual and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contours February 2021 MAC Community Relations Office and HNTB Corporation MSP 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report Metropolitan Airports Commission Table of Contents ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 ES.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 AIRPORT NOISE LITIGATION AND CONSENT DECREE .............................................................. 1 ES.3 MSP 2020 IMPROVEMENTS EA/EAW ..................................................................................... 2 ES.4 THE AMENDED CONSENT DECREE ......................................................................................... 2 ES.5 2020 NOISE CONTOURS ......................................................................................................... 3 ES.6 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY ............................................................. 3 ES.7 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM MITIGATION STATUS ............................................. 3 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 8 1.1 CORRECTIVE LAND USE EFFORTS TO ADDRESS AIRCRAFT NOISE ............................................ 8 1.2 2007 FORECAST CONTOUR .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Police Aviation News August 2015
    Police Aviation News August 2015 ©Police Aviation Research Number 232 August 2015 PAR Police Aviation News August 2015 2 PAN—Police Aviation News is published monthly by POLICE AVIATION RESEARCH, 7 Wind- mill Close, Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, Essex EN9 3BQ UK. Contacts: Main: +44 1992 714162 Cell: +44 7778 296650 Skype: BrynElliott E-mail: [email protected] Police Aviation Research Airborne Law Enforcement Member since 1994—Corporate Member since 2014 SPONSORS Airborne Technologies www.airbornetechnologies.at AeroComputers www.aerocomputers.com Avalex Displays www.avalex.com Broadcast Microwave www.bms-inc.com FLIR Systems www.flir.com L3 Wescam www.wescam.com Powervamp www.powervamp.com Trakka Searchlights www.trakkacorp.com Airborne Law Enforcement Association www.alea.org EDITORIAL I have just returned from Houston and the ALEA annual convention. It may be many miles from my home shores and the words may have been spoken by an American but they rang somewhat true to the situation at home where the new and developing National Police Air Service is still finding its feet. I was sitting in on the Unit Managers Course when the instructor, a greatly respected man who earned his respect by running a large and successful air operation, reminded his stu- dents of their purpose in life. “If the cops on the street are not screaming for you to come in the expectation of getting [air support] help, the operation is flawed and should be considered a failure” Bryn Elliott LAW ENFORCEMENT BRAZIL PARA: Emergency services aviation in Brazil has reportedly fallen on hard times. A few years ago the sector had in place a major forward plan that encompassed most of Brazil’s States and most of the airborne service provision and was expected to see growth in re- sources and manpower controlled within a number of complex governing groups [DFNSP, CAVSEG, CONAV, AEAP, SENASP] but when President Rousseff took power in 2011 she swept them away leaving a vacuum.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 2005/07/R
    DECISION No 2005/07/R OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY of 19-12-2005 amending Decision No 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Regulation) and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agency”), and in particular Articles 13 and 14 thereof. Having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 28 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks.2 Whereas: (1) Annex IV Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part- 66 Appendix 1 Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence (hereinafter referred to as Part-66 AMC Appendix I) is required to be up to date to serve as reference for the national aviation authorities. (2) To achieve this requirement the text of Part-66 AMC Appendix I should be amended regularly to add new aircraft type rating. (3) The regular amendment of Part-66 AMC Appendix I is considered as a permanent rulemaking task for the Agency. This decision represents the first update according to an accelerated procedure accepted by AGNA and SSCC.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Name Stage Flights Aircraft Hours AEROSPATIALE AS350 NO
    Public Transport Air Taxi Operations (a) for Year 2019 Table 1.13 Aircraft Name Stage Flights Aircraft Hours AEROSPATIALE AS350 NO MASTER SERIES 3 169 3 307 ASSIGNED AEROSPATIALE AS355 NO MASTER SERIES 4 418 5 715 ASSIGNED AEROSPATIALE AS365 NO MASTER SERIES 8 978 1 916 ASSIGNED AGUSTA A109 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 12 221 5 323 AGUSTA AW139 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 16 161 11 514 AGUSTA AW169 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 8 120 2 198 AGUSTA AW189 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 5 773 5 120 AIRBUS A321 200N 1 1 ATR ATR42 500 6 17 ATR ATR72 200 2 079 1 896 BAE JETSTREAM 4100 4100 1 783 1 185 BEECH 200 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 9 396 9 178 BEECH 300 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 15 14 BEECH 400 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 1 726 2 721 BEECH 90 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 202 188 BELL 206 B 9 792 2 264 BELL 429 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 1 053 951 BOMBARDIER BD100 1A10 NO MASTER SERIES 201 348 ASSIGNED BRITTEN NORMAN BN2A UNDESIGNATED MASTER 7 495 2 242 SERIES BRITTEN NORMAN BN2T NO MASTER SERIES 510 687 ASSIGNED CANADAIR CL600 2B16 600 813 1 438 CESSNA 310 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 765 747 CESSNA 402 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 233 199 CESSNA 404 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 67 57 CESSNA 421 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 162 167 CESSNA 510 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 1 044 1 066 CESSNA 525 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 1 524 1 986 CESSNA 550 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 1 442 1 902 CESSNA 560 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 2 970 3 576 CESSNA 680 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 308 528 CESSNA F406 NO MASTER SERIES ASSIGNED 894 672 DASSAULT FALCON 2000 NO MASTER SERIES 775 1 192 ASSIGNED
    [Show full text]
  • AD 2012-0170R2 [Task 2014.211] TGB Oil Level and Magnetic Chip Detector Insp and Pitch Control Rod Bearing Insp
    EASA AD No.: 2012-0170R2 EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE AD No.: 2012-0170R2 Date: 20 June 2014 Note: This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued by EASA, acting in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 on behalf of the European Community, its Member States and of the European third countries that participate in the activities of EASA under Article 66 of that Regulation. This AD is issued in accordance with EU 748/2012, Part 21.A.3B. In accordance with EC 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M.A.301, the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft shall be ensured by accomplishing any applicable ADs. Consequently, no person may operate an aircraft to which an AD applies, except in accordance with the requirements of that AD, unless otherwise specified by the Agency [EC 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M.A.303] or agreed with the Authority of the State of Registry [EC 216/2008, Article 14(4) exemption]. Design Approval Holder’s Name: Type/Model designation(s): AIRBUS HELICOPTERS SA 365, AS 365, SA 366 and EC 155 helicopters TCDS Number: EASA.R.105 Foreign AD: Not applicable Revision: This AD revises EASA AD 2012-0170R1, dated 18 October 2013. ATA 05 Time Limits and Maintenance Checks – Tail Rotor Gearbox (TGB) Oil Level and Magnetic Chip Detector – Inspection ATA 65 Tail Rotor – Pitch Control Rod Bearing – Inspection / Replacement Manufacturer(s): Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter, Eurocopter France, Aerospatiale). Applicability: SA 365 N1, AS 365 N2, AS 365 N3, SA 366 G1, EC 155 B and EC 155 B1 helicopters, all serial numbers, except those modified in accordance with Eurocopter (EC) modification (mod) 07 65B63.
    [Show full text]
  • Helideck Manual
    English version HELIDECK MANUAL Helicopter operations on offshore installations In cooperation with Revision date 01.09.2016 revisjonsdato 01.12.2015 Changes in this edition: • “OLF” is systematically changed to “Norwegian Oil and Gas Association” • References to Authority regulations updated • Relevant EN-standards updated • Minor changes in health requirements • Minor addition in refueling procedures • Enclosure F1 updated • Enclosure F2 updated • Enclosure F3 cancelled • Enclosure G updated • Enclosure I updated • Enclosure L updated DOKUMENTNR: REVISONSNR: REVISJONSDATO: Final 01.09.2016 Side 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 General .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose and scope ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Responsibilities ............................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Approval ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Distribution and Amendments ......................................................................................... 5 1.5 References ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 6 2
    [Show full text]
  • Iran and the Gulf Military Balance - I
    IRAN AND THE GULF MILITARY BALANCE - I The Conventional and Asymmetric Dimensions FIFTH WORKING DRAFT By Anthony H. Cordesman and Alexander Wilner Revised July 11, 2012 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Cordesman/Wilner: Iran & The Gulf Military Balance, Rev 5 7/11/12 2 Acknowledgements This analysis was made possible by a grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation. It draws on the work of Dr. Abdullah Toukan and a series of reports on Iran by Adam Seitz, a Senior Research Associate and Instructor, Middle East Studies, Marine Corps University. 2 Cordesman/Wilner: Iran & The Gulf Military Balance, Rev 5 7/11/12 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 6 Figure III.1: Summary Chronology of US-Iranian Military Competition: 2000-2011 ............................... 8 CURRENT PATTERNS IN THE STRUCTURE OF US AND IRANIAN MILITARY COMPETITION ........................................... 13 DIFFERING NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 17 US Perceptions .................................................................................................................................... 17 Iranian Perceptions............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopters 2015 Flightglobal’S Helicopter Data
    DATA INSIGHT HELICOPTERS 2015 FLIGHTGLOBAL’S HELICOPTER DATA This report features helicopter data capabilities with information extracted from Flightglobal’s Fleets Analyzer database. The report is divided in two sections: civil (page 3 to 7) and military (page 8 to 11). CONTENTS CIVil helicopters 3 Fleet share by region 3 Top 10 countries 4 Top 10 types 5 Q1&Q2 Deliveries 2014 vs 2015 6 Fleet growth & deliveries 7 MilitarY helicopters 8 Fleet share by region 8 Top 10 countries and types 9 Q1&Q2 Deliveries 2014 vs 2015 10 Fleet growth & deliveries 11 2 | Flightglobal CIVIL HELICOPTERS: FLEET SHARE BY REGION EUROPE NORTH AMERICA 27% 35% Turbine: 6,770 MIDDLE EAST Piston: 2,608 Turbine: 8,400 Piston: 3,654 2% ASIA-PACIFIC AFRICA Turbine: 509 Piston: 37 18% LATIN AMERICA 5% Turbine: 3,983 Turbine: 1,173 Piston: 2,102 13% Piston: 635 Turbine: 3,224 Piston: 1,192 WORLD total Turbine: 24,287 Piston: 10,266 Note: In-service fleet information based on operator’s location. An additional 1% of the fleet hasn’t been included in the above figures for helicopters based in unknown locations. SOURCE: Flightglobal’s Fleets Analyzer database (September 2015) 3 | Flightglobal CIVIL HELICOPTERS: TOP 10 COUNTRIES RANK COUNTRY TURBINE SHARE RANK COUNTRY PISTON SHARE 1 USA 6,667 27% 1 USA 3,084 30% 2 RUSSIA 1,881 8% 2 AUSTRALIA 1,084 11% 3 CANADA 1,733 7% 3 BRAZIL 578 6% 4 BRAZIL 1,234 5% 4 CANADA 570 6% 5 AUSTRALIA 778 3% 5 SOUTH AFRICA 566 6% 6 ITALY 674 3% 6 UK 413 4% 7 UK 663 3% 7 NEW ZEALAND 381 4% 8 JAPAN 617 3% 8 RUSSIA 339 3% 9 MEXICO 588 2% 9 FRANCE
    [Show full text]
  • Military Vehicle Options Arising from the Barrel Type Piston Engine
    Journal of Power Technologies 101 (1) (2021) 22–33 Military vehicle options arising from the barrel type piston engine Pawe l Mazuro1 and Cezary Chmielewski1,B 1Warsaw University of Technology B [email protected] Abstract in terms of efficiency, meaning that piston engines can deliver enhanced range and endurance. This is benefi- The article reviews knowledge about requirements for engines in cial in missions requiring a stopover for refueling and state-of-the-art unmanned aerial vehicles and tanks. Analysis of particularly useful for unmanned supply, observation design and operational parameters was carried out on selected and maritime missions. turboshaft and piston engines generating power in the range of 500 - 1500 kW (0.5 - 1.5 MW). The data was compared In contrast, land combat vehicles have significantly with the performance of innovative, barrel type piston engines, different drive unit requirements. High mobility en- which are likely to become an alternative drive solution in the ables the vehicle to rapidly change location after de- target vehicle groups. tection. To this end, the torque curve as a function of the rotational speed of the shaft is of decisive im- portance. Keywords: military UAV, tanks, turboshaft engines, piston engines, barrel type piston engines The complexity of tank engines adds an additional layer of requirements, impacting the reliability and durability of the power unit, and they come with re- 1 Introduction lated manufacturing and operating costs. In military land vehicles, the engine should be as small This article consolidates knowledge on options and as possible; the space saved can be used for other capabilities arising from use of the barrel type piston purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • External Support for Central Asian Military and Security Forces, Working
    External Support for Central Asian Military and Security Forces Working Paper DMITRY GORENBURG January 2014 Contents Summary iii Abbreviations vi 1. Introduction 1 2. Central Asian military capabilities and plans 2 I. Kazakhstan 3 II. Uzbekistan 8 III. Turkmenistan 12 IV. Kyrgyzstan 15 V. Tajikistan 20 VI. Overall trends in Central Asian military and security force capabilities 24 3. Assistance from Russia and former Soviet states 26 I. Equipment sales and donations 26 II. Cooperation in military exercises and joint operations 36 III. Bilateral exercises and training agreements 40 IV. Goals and consequences of Russian military assistance 46 4. Assistance from the United States 49 I. Equipment sales and donations 51 II. Cooperation in military exercises and joint operations 56 III. Goals and consequences of US military assistance 66 5. Assistance from other countries 69 I. Equipment sales and donations 69 II. Exercises and training 76 III. Goals and consequences of military assistance from other states 81 6. Conclusions and recommendations 83 I. Efforts to manipulate threat perceptions to increase local power 84 II. The impact of foreign assistance on military capabilities 85 III. The impact of foreign assistance on the capabilities of security services 87 IV. Recommendations 88 Summary As the drawdown of United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan has accelerated in preparation for the end of Operation Enduring Freedom in 2014, media attention has come to focus on the extent to which equipment being withdrawn from the region will be left behind for Central Asian states to use. At the same time, recent agreements for the extension of Russian military basing agreements in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan have drawn attention to the extent to which Russia is providing military equipment and other forms of security assistance to the region.
    [Show full text]