DOCSLIB.ORG

Year 7 Workbook 1 Civil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Year 7 Workbook 1 Civil Year 7 History Workbook 1 w/c 1st June What were the two sides in the Civil War? A war between two sides in the same country Any questions, please contact Miss Gunn via [email protected]. Where work has to be submitted, please email it to your class teacher: • Ms Gunn – [email protected] • Mrs Reeve-McKew [email protected] • Mrs Tunstall – [email protected] There were two men fighting against each other in the Civil War…… King Charles 1 Oliver Cromwell Royalist/Cavalier Parliament/Roundhead Versus The Two Sides in the Civil War The map shows whose side the various parts of the country were on but it wasn’t that simple. Look at the table below . Some of the hard words explained; Gentry = rich people MP = Member of Parliament Ports = where ships carrying goods go in and out of the country. • Using the map and the table on the previous page/slide, explain who you think had the strongest side and why? Was it King Charles 1 (royalist) or Oliver Cromwell (parliament)? There is no right or wrong, it’s what you think that counts! • Clues . think about the areas of land held by each side, the ports, London, the gentry. • If you are working in the workbook, use the page below. If you are working online, you can use your exercise book. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The soldiers; Roundheads and Cavaliers. Oliver Cromwell’s side King Charles’ side Roundhead/ Cavalier/Royalist parliamentarian • In August 1642 the English Civil War started. • At first, the King’s side (Royalists/Cavaliers) did much better than Cromwell’s side (Roundheads/Parliamentarians). This is because they had better equipment and used guns (they were called muskets). Charles might have been able to win the Civil War early on but he made some poor decisions and was not a good leader. • At the start of the Civil War, Cromwell’s side (Roundheads/Parliamentarians) did not have a very good army. But Cromwell was an excellent leader and trained what he called his New Model Army to fight for him. As you can see from the picture, they were well equipped with an iron breastplate to protect their vital organs, an iron gauntlet (glove) to protect their hands, a sword and a gun (musket) and a pot helmet to protect the head (this is why their nickname was the Roundheads). Task After looking at the armies, who do you now think had the strongest side? Explain your answer. Do you still think the same as previously? Explain your answer below if working in the work book or if working online, write in your exercise book. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ How did Cromwell improve the Parliamentarian Army? Match up the problems with the solutions of how Cromwell could improve his Problems Solutions army. If working online, you could print this off or write it out in the excercixe book. The army didn’t have Put men who are experienced experienced Generals and The men were honest fighters in charge of the Officers. Christians. army. The men were swearing too much. Introduced a big fine for bad Many of the men were not good language. people. You were punished by being put in the stocks if you had alcohol. The men were drunk and misbehaved. Task: Explain why the Parliamentarian army was so strong. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Task Describe two features of the Parliamentarian side during the Civil War. 4 marks • If working in the workbook, you could take a photo and email it to your class teacher. • If working online, please can you email a copy of this answer to your class teacher. • Use the writing frame below to help. One feature of the Parliamentarian side during the Civil War was . Stuck? …think about the areas of the country they controlled. Another feature of the Parliamentarian side in the Civil War was . Stuck? ... think about the soldiers _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • English Renaissance
    1 ENGLISH RENAISSANCE Unit Structure: 1.0 Objectives 1.1 The Historical Overview 1.2 The Elizabethan and Jacobean Ages 1.2.1 Political Peace and Stability 1.2.2 Social Development 1.2.3 Religious Tolerance 1.2.4 Sense and Feeling of Patriotism 1.2.5 Discovery, Exploration and Expansion 1.2.6 Influence of Foreign Fashions 1.2.7 Contradictions and Set of Oppositions 1.3 The Literary Tendencies of the Age 1.3.1 Foreign Influences 1.3.2 Influence of Reformation 1.3.3 Ardent Spirit of Adventure 1.3.4 Abundance of Output 1.4 Elizabethan Poetry 1.4.1 Love Poetry 1.4.2 Patriotic Poetry 1.4.3 Philosophical Poetry 1.4.4 Satirical Poetry 1.4.5 Poets of the Age 1.4.6 Songs and Lyrics in Elizabethan Poetry 1.4.7 Elizabethan Sonnets and Sonneteers 1.5 Elizabethan Prose 1.5.1 Prose in Early Renaissance 1.5.2 The Essay 1.5.3 Character Writers 1.5.4 Religious Prose 1.5.5 Prose Romances 2 1.6 Elizabethan Drama 1.6.1 The University Wits 1.6.2 Dramatic Activity of Shakespeare 1.6.3 Other Playwrights 1.7. Let‘s Sum up 1.8 Important Questions 1.0. OBJECTIVES This unit will make the students aware with: The historical and socio-political knowledge of Elizabethan and Jacobean Ages. Features of the ages. Literary tendencies, literary contributions to the different of genres like poetry, prose and drama. The important writers are introduced with their major works. With this knowledge the students will be able to locate the particular works in the tradition of literature, and again they will study the prescribed texts in the historical background.
    [Show full text]
  • Ingo Berensmeyer Literary Culture in Early Modern England, 1630–1700
    Ingo Berensmeyer Literary Culture in Early Modern England, 1630–1700 Ingo Berensmeyer Literary Culture in Early Modern England, 1630–1700 Angles of Contingency This book is a revised translation of “Angles of Contingency”: Literarische Kultur im England des siebzehnten Jahrhunderts, originally published in German by Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen 2007, as vol. 39 of the Anglia Book Series. ISBN 978-3-11-069130-6 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-069137-5 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-069140-5 DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110691375 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2020934495 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available from the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. ©2020 Ingo Berensmeyer, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Cover image: Jan Davidszoon de Heem, Vanitas Still Life with Books, a Globe, a Skull, a Violin and a Fan, c. 1650. UtCon Collection/Alamy Stock Photo. Typesetting: Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Preface to the Revised Edition This book was first published in German in 2007 as volume 39 of the Anglia Book Series. In returning to it for this English version, I decided not simply to translate but to revise it thoroughly in order to correct mistakes, bring it up to date, and make it a little more reader-friendly by discarding at least some of its Teutonic bag- gage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cannibal Cavalier: Sir Thomas Lunsford and the Fashioning of the Royalist Archetype*
    The Historical Journal, page of © Cambridge University Press doi:./SX 1 2 THE CANNIBAL CAVALIER: SIR THOMAS 3 4 LUNSFORD AND THE FASHIONING OF 5 THE ROYALIST ARCHETYPE* 6 7 MARK STOYLE 8 University of Southampton 9 10 11 ABSTRACT. This article re-examines the career of Sir Thomas Lunsford, one of the most notorious 12 royalist officers of the English Civil War. Drawing on a wide range of contemporary sources, it not 13 only casts new light on the pre-war activities of Lunsford himself but also explores the ways in 14 which his blood-thirsty reputation was exploited by parliamentarian polemicists on the eve of the 15 conflict. The article argues that, following the death of the proto-royalist playwright and plotter Sir ’ ‘ ’ 16 John Suckling in , Lunsford inherited Suckling s mantle as the archetypal cavalier , and that it was in association with Sir Thomas’s name, rather than Sir John’s, that the hostile caricature 17 of the royalist gentleman-at-arms was first introduced to the English population as a whole. The 18 article concludes by exploring the persistent rumours of cannibalism which have swirled around 19 Lunsford’s name for the past years – and by demonstrating that, while the claim that Sir 20 Thomas possessed a taste for human flesh may well have originated in the parliamentarian camp, 21 it was, rather surprisingly, royalist writers who subsequently did most to keep his anthropophagical 22 reputation alive. 23 24 25 26 27 ‘Cavaliers and roundheads’: the popular party-labels which were applied to the 28 supporters of Charles I and parliament during the Great Civil War of – 29 have continued to haunt the English historical imagination ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • YEAR 4: the ENGLISH CIVIL WAR and AFTER (5 Lessons)
    YEAR 4: THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR AND AFTER (5 lessons) Contents Include: The English Civil War Charles II and the Restoration The Great Fire of London The Glorious Revolution The Bill of Rights Suggested Teacher Resources: The Young Oxford History of Britain & Ireland, pages 212-238. A People’s History of Britain by Rebecca Fraser, pages 327-384. Great Tales from English History by Robert Lacey, pages 254-292. The BBC website has some useful articles on the period. This is an excellent website for the Civil War, especially for local history. 2 Lesson 1. The English Civil War The English Civil War began in 1642, and was fought between supporters of Parliament and supporters of the King. It lasted for seven years, and was the bloodiest conflict ever fought on English soil. Nearly 4% of the population died, and families were pitted against each other: brother against brother, father against son. The soldiers who fought for Parliament were nicknamed the ‘roundheads’ due to their short hair, and those who fought for the King were nicknamed ‘cavaliers’ due to their flamboyant appearance. The roundheads were the more disciplined army, and eventually won the war. See pages 157-160 of What Your Year 4 Child Needs to Know. Learning Objective Core Knowledge Activities for Learning Related Vocabulary Assessment Questions To understand who The English Civil War lasted for Complete a short timeline of the English Parliamentarian What was the the two different seven years and lots of people Civil War, and perhaps plot the location Royalist difference between the sides during the civil died.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Prisoners of War in England During the English Civil Wars, 22 August, 1642 - 30 January, 1648/49
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1968 Treatment of prisoners of war in England during the English Civil Wars, 22 August, 1642 - 30 January, 1648/49 Gary Tristram Cummins The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Cummins, Gary Tristram, "Treatment of prisoners of war in England during the English Civil Wars, 22 August, 1642 - 30 January, 1648/49" (1968). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3948. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3948 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRBATJ^MT OF PRISONERS OF WAR IN EM6LAND 0URIM6 THE ENGLISH CIVIL WARS 22 AUGUST 1642 - 30 JANUARY 1648/49 by ISARY TRISTRAM C»#IIN8 i.A, University oi Mmtam, 1964 Presented In partial fulftll»©nt of th« requirements for the d®gr®e of Master of Arts University of Montana 19fi8 Approved: .^.4.,.3dAAsdag!Ac. '»€&iat« December 12, 1968 Dste UMI Number EP34264 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideology of Jury Law-Finding in the Interregnum
    Conscience and the True Law: 5 The Ideology of Jury Law-Finding in the Interregnum The government that tried and condemned Charles I in January, 1649, found later the same year that it was unable to have its way with John Lilburne. As leader of the Levellers, the most imposing of the groups that clashed with the Cromwellian regime, Lilburne appealed to his jurors, in a celebrated phrase, "as judges of law as well as fact. " 1 When the jury acquitted him of treason, this claim to a "jury right"-a right of the jury to decide the law-brought the criminal trial jury for the first time into the forefront of English constitutional and political debate.2 The emergence of a theory of the jury's right to decide the law was not in any simple way a reaction to the transformation of criminal process in early modern England. On the one hand, much of what the radical reformers attacked predated the Tudor period; on the other, much of their program was inspired by the political crisis that accompanied the struggle against the Stuart monarchy .3 Nevertheless, the Leveller attack on the judiciary in criminal cases was a response to the power and behavior of the bench, and that power and behavior were largely owing to new forms of criminal procedure. 1. See below, text at nn. 67-77. On the Levellers see e.g. H. N. Brailsford, The Levellers and the English Revolution (London, 1961); Joseph Frank, The Levellers (Cambridge, Mass., 1955); G. E. Aylmer, ed., The Levellers in the English Revolution (London, 1975), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Objective, Success Criteria…
    Learning Objective, Success Criteria… LO: To understand who the two different sides during the civil war were, and why the roundheads won. Success Criteria I can use persuasive language to explain why my village should fight for either Cavaliers or the Roundheads. I can create a recruitment poster supporting either Cavaliers or the Roundheads. Key vocabulary I can match the statements to either Roundheads or Cavalier Civil war soldiers. Parliamentarians Roundheads Royalists Don’t forget at the end of the lesson to self assess (SA) Cavalier on your sticker how successful you have been with Treason your learning using Puritan New Model Army Starter… Spot The Mistakes Read the passage below and correct spelling and capital letters there are 7 mistakes in total. Re-write this passage with the correction in your book. Can you find them all? King charles maryied a catholic named Maria. This upset lots of prodestants in England. They feared he was trying to turn England into a catholic country. Things got even worse when the king introduced unpopular taxes. The king made a huge mistake when he began making changes to the cherch. Divided… When the civil war broke out in 1642, people across the country were divided over whether to be loyal to the King or parliament. Charles I Parliament Divided… Nearly 4% of the population died, and families were pitted against each other: brother against brother, father against son. Could you image fighting against your against members of your family because you supported different sides? Roundheads and Cavaliers… The soldiers who fought for Parliament were nicknamed the ‘roundheads’ due to their short hair, and those who fought for the King were nicknamed ‘cavaliers’ due to their flamboyant appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • James Compton, Third Earl of Northampton
    A Iirnil'RTO UNRECOGNIZED CAVALIER DRAMATIST: JAMES COMPTON, THIRD EARL OF NORTHAMPTON H I I. ION K KI t.tllF.R ON 8 March K)78 there was offered for sale at Christie's, as lot 293, a large collection oric:inatinG; trom Castle .\shb\ in Northamptonshire of plays and other writings in manuscript that had largely been lost sight of since Thomas Percy, the literary historian and editor ot the Reliques of Ancient English Poetry^ first noted their existence during his residence in the area as Vicar of Easton Maudit between 1753 and 1782. They had been rccoxered as recently as September 1977 by the present Marquess of Northampton from the back ot a drawer in the house, and their rediscovery had been announced in '//;(• Tunes Literary Supplement of 9 December that year by Professor William P. \\ illianis, an .American scholar whose inquiry regarding their whereabouts had prompted this tortunate event.' Percy's list of nine ofthe plays in this collection occurs among the annotations that he made in a copy of Langbaine's Account of the English Dramatic Poets (Oxford, r6(ji) that is now preserved in F^dinburgh University Library.^ It was to Cosmo \lanucci or Manuche, the author of two of the pieces in his list as also of a iliird not rccnrdcd b\ him that Percy had, as he later recalled in his notes, been inclined to ascribe all ihu plays when he saw them together. Christie's cataloguer was more cautious, ascribing all but those manuscripts that bear Manuche's signed dedications to the 3rd l",arl of Northampton to an 'unidentified Cavalier Dramatist, circa 1640 to 1050', though mentioning a possibility that they might be the work of one Samuel Holland, the manuscripts of whose two-part masque entitled The Enchanted Groi\\-^ also dedicated to Northampton and now lost (though perhaps not beyond hope of recovery), Percy had also seen at Castle Asbby.
    [Show full text]
  • 315 LIST ADAM, F. the Clans, Septs and Regiments of the Scottish Highlands
    LIST 315 1. ADAM, F. The Clans, Septs and Regiments of the Scottish Highlands. £ 15.00 (Includes Lowland Cameronians) Edin.-1934. ills. 2. ADAMSON, W. The Religious Anecdotes of Scotland. Lon.-1893. hb. 16 £ 12.00 +407pp. Good copy. 3. AIKMAN, J. An Historical Account of Covenanting in Scotland. Edin-1848. £ 45.00 hb. 90pp WITH Fold out facsimile National Covenant, folded in boards, c1890. Both very scarce. 4. AITON, William A History of the Recounter at Drumclog, and the Battle at £ 45.00 Bothwell Bridge, in the Month of June 1670... Hamilton-1821. 131pp. 1/2 calf with marbled boards. Slight wear to edges, otherwise a good copy of a very scarce work. With fold out frontispiece depicting battle of Bothwell Bridge. 5. ANDERSON, H. M. Kelston of Kells. Blackwood-nd., c1920. hb. 420pp. £ 6.50 6. (ANDERSON, J.) Patrick Welwood. A tale of the Times of the Kirk and £ 18.00 Covenant, for the Young. Glas.-1849. hb. 15+303pp. Scarce work. 7. ANDERSON, James The Ladies of the Covenant. Blackie-1851. hb. 36+627pp. £ 25.00 Slightly shaken, original cloth binding with gilt and blind tooling. 8. ANON Historical and Traditional Tales in Prose and Verse Connected £ 15.00 with the South of Scotland. (much on covenanting) Kirkcudbrught-1943. hb. 450pp. 9. ANON Tales and Sketches of the Covenanters. Newcastle-1880. hb. 12 £ 6.50 +372pp. ills. 10. ANON James Renwick a Biographical Sketch for the Young. SRS. £ 6.95 -1888. pam. 16pp. 11. ANON From Ayrshires Story. Lang Syne-1977. lfpb. c100pp. ills. £ 4.50 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Boscobel House and the Royal Oak Teachers'
    KS1-2KS1–2 KS3 TEACHERS’ KIT KS4 Boscobel House and the Royal Oak SEND This kit helps teachers plan a visit to Boscobel House and the Royal Oak. Boscobel played a brief but important role in the English Civil War when it sheltered and hid the future King Charles II. Use these resources before, during and after your visit to help students get the most out of their learning. GET IN TOUCH WITH OUR EDUCATION BOOKINGS TEAM: 0370 333 0606 [email protected] bookings.english-heritage.org.uk/education Share your visit with us on Twitter @EHEducation The English Heritage Trust is a charity, no. 1140351, and a company, no. 07447221, registered in England. All images are copyright of English Heritage or Historic England unless otherwise stated. Published March 2021 WELCOME This Teachers’ Kit for Boscobel House and the Royal Oak has been designed for teachers and group leaders to support a free self-led visit to the site. It includes a variety of materials suited to teaching a wide range of subjects and key stages, with practical information, activities for use on site and ideas to support follow-up learning. We know that each class and study group is different, so we have collated our resources into one kit allowing you to decide which materials are best suited to your needs. Please use the contents page, which has been colour- coded to help you easily locate what you need and view individual sections. All of our activities have clear guidance on the intended use for study so you can adapt them for your desired learning outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford-History-Portraiture-By-Shearer
    Portraiture Oxford History of Art Shearer West is Professor of Art History at 1890–1940, and the edited books Visions of the the University of Birmingham. Her publica- ‘neue Frau’: Women and the Visual Arts in tions include The Image of the Actor: Verbal and Weimar Germany (with Marsha Meskimmon), Visual Representation in the Age of Garrick and The Bloomsbury Guide to Art, The Victorians Kemble, Fin de Siècle: Art and Society in an Age and Race, and Italian Culture in Northern of Uncertainty, The Visual Arts in Germany Europe in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford History of Art Titles in the Oxford History of Art series are up-to-date, fully illustrated introductions to a wide variety of subjects written by leading experts in their field. They will appear regularly, building into an interlocking and comprehensive series. In the list below, published titles appear in bold. WESTERN ART Modern Architecture Native North American Archaic and Classical Alan Colquhoun Art Greek Art Contemporary Janet Berlo & Ruth Phillips Robin Osborne Architecture Polynesian and Classical Art Anthony Vidler Micronesian Art From Greece to Rome Architecture in the Adrienne Kaeppler Mary Beard & United States South-East Asian Art John Henderson Dell Upton John Guy Imperial Rome and WORLD ART Latin American Art Christian Triumph WESTERN DESIGN Jas Elsner Aegean Art and Architecture Twentieth-Century Design Early Medieval Art Donald Preziosi & Jonathan Woodham Lawrence Nees Louise Hitchcock American Design Medieval Art Early Art and Architecture Jeffrey Meikle Veronica Sekules of Africa Nineteenth-Century Art in Renaissance Italy Peter Garlake Design Evelyn Welch African Art Gillian Naylor Northern European Art John Picton Fashion Susie Nash Contemporary African Art Christopher Breward Early Modern Art Olu Oguibe PHOTOGRAPHY Nigel Llewellyn African-American Art The Photograph Art in Europe 1700–1830 Sharon F.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday History Battles PDF File
    Battles of the English Civil War – our lesson today Today’s BIG question… Can one battle seal a King’s fate? There were many major battles during the English Civil War – some were so important that they changed the course of the war and the course of history. The Battle of Edgehill (1642) The Battle of Newbury (1643) The Battle of Marston Moor (1644) The Battle of Naseby (1645) Edgehill The numbers: The main players: • October 23rd 1642. King Charles, • The Roundhead army had around 12,000 Prince Rupert, infantry men (musketeers and pikemen), 2,000 Lord Essex, men on horses (cavalry) and about 30 cannons Sir Faithful Fortesque, (artillery). Sir James Ramsey, • The Cavalier army had around 10,000 men in total (infantry and cavalry) and 20 cannons. The winner? The battle ended with no obvious winner or loser – but both sides said they had won! As it was October, it got dark and cold very quickly. Both sides lost about 1,500 men – mostly infantrymen. Newbury The numbers: The main players: •The first battle of Newbury took place King Charles, September 20th 1643. Prince Rupert, •In total Essex could count on 15,000 men. Lord Essex, •Fighting went on possibly until 10.00 at night The winner? Early in the morning of September 21st, Lord Essex found that the King and his Cavalier army had retreated to Oxford. The Roundheads had won the battle. Marston Moor The numbers: The main players: •The Battle of Marston Moor - July Prince Rupert, 2nd 1644, Lord John Byron, •28,000 Roundhead men, Oliver Cromwell, •18,000 Cavalier men, Duke of Newcastle, The winner? The Roundheads had won the battle, which meant that the King and the Cavaliers had lost their power in the North of England.
    [Show full text]