LINX Response for the Scottish Infrastructure Commission

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LINX Response for the Scottish Infrastructure Commission LINX Response for the Scottish Infrastructure Commission Author: Jo Fereday Date of this issue: 03 May 2019 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 3 2. LINX .................................................................................................................. 3 3. LINX Response ................................................................................................ 4 4. Short term focus for infrastructure growth (5 years) .................................. 5 5. Longer term focus for infrastructure growth ............................................... 6 Document change history Version 0.1 Initial draft Version 0.x (details of changes to be added) Version 0.x (details of changes to be added) Version 1.0 (to be the final release version of the document) 2 1. Introduction The London Internet Exchange (LINX) is a leading global Internet exchange. Building on their success in London LINX has successfully established regional internet exchanges (IXPs) in Scotland, Manchester and Cardiff in the UK and Northern Virginia in the US. Internet exchanges an important part of regional digital infrastructure and it is for this reason that LINX are responding to this request. Internet traffic is passed between service and content providers through Internet exchanges. A regional Internet exchange can provide faster and more resilient interconnectivity in the region, especially if local access network providers take part in the exchange of traffic. The Internet exchange market is a global business, and LINX’s strategy is to target the global interconnect market across all segments including, Internet traffic, Enterprise traffic and cloud services, whilst remaining local to the UK and operating as a mutual member owned organisation. 2. LINX LINX was established in 1994, as a membership organisation by a group of local Internet service providers (ISPs). The organisation is owned and run by its members on a not for profit basis, with the aim of providing services for its members and working for the good of the Internet. In this document LINX refer to members, most organisations would refer to them as customers, or service users. LINX now has a large membership with almost 900 connected networks from more than 80 different countries. It has a presence in 16 London data centres providing a connected capacity of 26 Tb/s and has peak traffic of in excess of 4 Tb/s. Peering is the main service offered by LINX to its members . LINX members in London consist of almost all of the UK ISPs, content creators such as BBC, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Netflix, content delivery networks such as Akamai, Edgecast, Cloudflare, and large access networks, such as Zayo, Level 3 and NTT. Being the oldest IXP in the UK, and one of the oldest in the world LINX has vast experience in running successful Internet exchanges as well as a reputation for reliability and leading edge technology. These are all experiences that LINX has benefited LINX in establishing and executing its regional peering strategy. Having established a strong London based Internet exchange, LINX set about building regional exchanges within the UK with the aim of promoting geographically distributed peering which keeps traffic local and less dependency on London. These factors enable Internet services with less latency regionally, make the national network more resilient by not being dependent on a single UK exchange (London) and potentially save costs of back haul for network operators. Combined this help to grow digital services outside of London. In line with this strategy LINX first established a regional IXP in Manchester, and later established LINX Scotland in 2013. 3 While LINX IXP in Manchester has grown to over 100 connected networks at three different datacentres, there is less current demand in Scotland. LINX IXP in Scotland operates from 2 sites (Edinburgh and Airdrie) and has approximately 30 connected members. 3. LINX Response The definition of infrastructure as outlined by the commission does encompass the elements that are required to ensure digital growth. LINX are not in a position to comment on the individual elements and have limited their response to the requirements needed for a successful Internet exchange and interconnect eco system. This includes how to attract the different interest groups to the exchange and how to remain relevant over a longer time period. The Internet is a network of networks around the world. For Internet Exchanges, especially regional ones, to be successful they need to attract a critical mass of networks to ensure there is enough value for a network to connect, but they also need the right mix of networks. An IXP with only content networks connected for example does not provide any value as they will have no one to exchange traffic with. Therefore attracting both access providers and content providers is key to the success of an IXP. Furthermore, as the key value proposition of a regional IXP is to keep local traffic local the presence of the access providers that are dominant or active in the local market is crucial. As the interconnect market transforms, other players are becoming more important for example Cloud service providers and local enterprise solution access providers as well as government networks and content. The types of networks can be classified as 1. Large national network providers, often incumbent such as BT in the UK and France Telecom in France 2. Large mobile networks such as Vodaphone or O2 3. Global network providers 4. National players serving specific markets such as education networks or providers targeting business parks 5. Large national content providers such as the BBC or Sky 6. Global content providers 7. Local Internet service providers 8. Local content providers such as reginal governments 9. Local Enterprise networks 10. Local hybrid companies often providing managed content and network services for others 11. Market specialists, providing online services such as gaming companies like Sony or comparison websites such as booking.com 12. Large Global service providers often referred to as hyperscales such as Amazon web services and Microsoft. 4 Attracting these different groups to Scotland would help further build the digital infrastructure in Scotland. LINX together with the support from Scottish Futures trust and the Scottish Government have been successful in attracting local as well as large global content providers to LINX Scotland. 4. Short term focus for infrastructure growth (5 years) Critical to the operation of an internet exchange is the ability to attract the groups listed above. As noted, LINX Scotland has much of the content networks connected and present in Scotland which means that focus should shift to the access providers that serve consumers and enterprises in Scotland. Improved resilience of Internet and telecommunications infrastructure as well lower latency for services will provide for a better environment for a digital services economy to grow. Scotland’s population is relatively small compared to other countries in the global market but it is concentrated in two main central locations, Edinburgh and Glasgow, where LINX Scotland already has presence. Working with the access networks in these locations to connect to LINX Scotland would improve the services for a large number of Internet users in Scotland. For the more remote areas, Scotland has an active market of smaller or community run access providers who to some extent are connected to LINX Scotland. While the larger access networks have arrangements with content providers including access to content in their networks in Scotland which already helps the Scottish Internet users, the small and medium sized access networks should be encouraged to connect to LINX Scotland. Scotland also already has good media hubs and a specialist oil and gas community which could further nurture a specialist digital community. Organising and understanding these groups communication and collaboration needs would help identify the types of Internet traffic that can be kept in Scotland and how to improve the digital infrastructure. Additionally, Scotland could offer support to encourage large content providers and hyperscale organisations to the region. These organisations have a complex set of requirements for their high quality data centres, including planning permissions, access to low-cost power and multiple redundant connectivity options. Just below the hyperscale installations there are also need for large datacentre space in existing datacentres with access to redundant connectivity. Lack of choice of connectivity to the data centres will also deter content providers and hosting service providers. When deciding upon data centre locations organisations will need multiple redundant routes to the data centre to give resilience to the service. Recently when building the second site for LINX Scotland two diverse dark fibre connections were needed between Glasgow and Edinburgh. Only one was available, with the second route offered via Manchester. Whilst LINX were able to use an alternative second route, other organisations may not have such flexibility. 5 Support for community broad band initiatives that reach out to the wider population and connecting these to the exchange, help build reliable digital infrastructure, and remove the need for travel thus supporting low carbon growth. 25 years ago, the initial business case for connection to an Internet
Recommended publications
  • Hacking the Master Switch? the Role of Infrastructure in Google's
    Hacking the Master Switch? The Role of Infrastructure in Google’s Network Neutrality Strategy in the 2000s by John Harris Stevenson A thesis submitteD in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information University of Toronto © Copyright by John Harris Stevenson 2017 Hacking the Master Switch? The Role of Infrastructure in Google’s Network Neutrality Strategy in the 2000s John Harris Stevenson Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information University of Toronto 2017 Abstract During most of the decade of the 2000s, global Internet company Google Inc. was one of the most prominent public champions of the notion of network neutrality, the network design principle conceived by Tim Wu that all Internet traffic should be treated equally by network operators. However, in 2010, following a series of joint policy statements on network neutrality with telecommunications giant Verizon, Google fell nearly silent on the issue, despite Wu arguing that a neutral Internet was vital to Google’s survival. During this period, Google engaged in a massive expansion of its services and technical infrastructure. My research examines the influence of Google’s systems and service offerings on the company’s approach to network neutrality policy making. Drawing on documentary evidence and network analysis data, I identify Google’s global proprietary networks and server locations worldwide, including over 1500 Google edge caching servers located at Internet service providers. ii I argue that the affordances provided by its systems allowed Google to mitigate potential retail and transit ISP gatekeeping. Drawing on the work of Latour and Callon in Actor– network theory, I posit the existence of at least one actor-network formed among Google and ISPs, centred on an interest in the utility of Google’s edge caching servers and the success of the Android operating system.
    [Show full text]
  • Interconnection
    Interconnection 101 As cloud usage takes off, data production grows exponentially, content pushes closer to the edge, and end users demand data and applications at all hours from all locations, the ability to connect with a wide variety of players becomes ever more important. This report introduces interconnection, its key players and busi- ness models, and trends that could affect interconnection going forward. KEY FINDINGS Network-dense, interconnection-oriented facilities are not easy to replicate and are typically able to charge higher prices for colocation, as well as charging for cross-connects and, in some cases, access to public Internet exchange platforms and cloud platforms. Competition is increasing, however, and competitors are starting the long process of creating network-dense sites. At the same time, these sites are valuable and are being acquired, so the sector is consolidating. Having facili- ties in multiple markets does seem to provide some competitive advantage, particularly if the facilities are similar in look and feel and customers can monitor them all from a single portal and have them on the same contract. Mobility, the Internet of Things, services such as SaaS and IaaS (cloud), and content delivery all depend on net- work performance. In many cases, a key way to improve network performance is to push content, processing and peering closer to the edge of the Internet. This is likely to drive demand for facilities in smaller markets that offer interconnection options. We also see these trends continuing to drive demand for interconnection facilities in the larger markets as well. © 2015 451 RESEARCH, LLC AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES.
    [Show full text]
  • Société, Information Et Nouvelles Technologies: Le Cas De La Grande
    Société, information et nouvelles technologies : le cas de la Grande-Bretagne Jacqueline Colnel To cite this version: Jacqueline Colnel. Société, information et nouvelles technologies : le cas de la Grande-Bretagne. Sciences de l’information et de la communication. Université de la Sorbonne nouvelle - Paris III, 2009. Français. NNT : 2009PA030015. tel-01356701 HAL Id: tel-01356701 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01356701 Submitted on 26 Aug 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE SORBONNE NOUVELLE – PARIS 3 UFR du Monde Anglophone THESE DE DOCTORAT Discipline : Etudes du monde anglophone AUTEUR Jacqueline Colnel SOCIETE, INFORMATION ET NOUVELLES TECHNOLOGIES : LE CAS DE LA GRANDE-BRETAGNE Thèse dirigée par Monsieur Jean-Claude SERGEANT Soutenue le 14 février 2009 JURY : Mme Renée Dickason M. Michel Lemosse M. Michaël Palmer 1 REMERCIEMENTS Je remercie vivement Monsieur le Professeur Jean-Claude SERGEANT, mon directeur de thèse, qui a accepté de diriger mes recherches, m’a guidée et m’a prodigué ses précieux conseils avec bienveillance tout au long de ces années avec beaucoup de disponibilité. Mes remerciements vont aussi à ma famille et à mes amis qui m’ont beaucoup soutenue pendant cettre entreprise.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vital Part of the Critical National Infrastructure Version
    Telecommunications Networks – a vital part of the Critical National Infrastructure Version 1.0 The Essentials of Telecommunications - an introduction Version 1.0 1 Telecommunications Networks – A Vital Part of the Critical National Infrastructure CONTENTS page no Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Chapter 1: The Nature of UK Telecommunications Networks - Describes the nature of the UK telecommunications networks. If you are familiar with telecommunications, you may want to skip straight to Chapter 2. 5 Chapter 2: Types of Telecommunications Companies in the UK - Describes the commercial environment and the wide variety of telecommunications providers in the market, which collectively make up the ‘UK Network’. 14 Chapter 3: Threats to Continuity of Service - Describes the wide range of threats to the continuity of service over the UK networks. 16 Chapter 4: Resilience measures taken by telecommunications companies- Covers the typical measures taken by the network companies to meet the challenges posed by these threats and mentions some of the remaining residual problems. 18 Chapter 5: Statutory provisions concerning telecommunications resilience - Telecommunications is now a competitive private sector activity, there are a range of statutory provisions that touch on the government’s ability to assure the resilience of the UK networks and these are described in Chapter 5. 21 Chapter 6: Roles of Government departments, the regulator and other agencies - Sets out the roles and responsibilities of the various government departments, the regulator (Ofcom) and other agencies, describing how in practice they work together as an extended team in assuring resilience. 27 Chapter 7: Emergency Plans and response measures - Covers the present arrangements in the telecommunications sector which ensure that industry and government work effectively together in emergencies and other times of stress.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 March 2018, Dubai Pre-Event: Subsea Middle East Summit & 5 March Welcome Evening Reception
    Middle East 2018 6 - 8 March 2018, Dubai Pre-Event: Subsea Middle East Summit & 5 March Welcome Evening Reception THANK YOU TO THE SPONSORS: HOST SPONSOR DIAMOND SPONSOR PLATINUM SPONSORS tawasul telecom ITW Logo Bold & Bigger GOLD SPONSORS SILVER SPONSORS ASSOCIATE SPONSORS 1587 450 ATTENDEES ORGANISATIONS 52% 80 C-LEVEL, PRESIDENT, VP, COUNTRIES REPRESENTED SVP, EVP, DIRECTOR & HEAD 54 128 INDUSTRY LEADING SPEAKERS NEW COMPANIES COUNTRIES IN ATTENDANCE AFGHANISTAN CZECH REPUBLIC ISRAEL NEPAL SOMALIA ALBANIA DJIBOUTI ITALY NETHERLANDS SOUTH AFRICA ARMENIA EGYPT JAPAN NEW ZEALAND SPAIN AUSTRALIA ESPANA JORDAN NORWAY SRI LANKA AUSTRIA ESTONIA KAZAKHSTAN OMAN SUDAN BAHRAIN FRANCE KENYA PAKISTAN SWEDEN BANGLADESH GERMANY KUWAIT PALESTINE SWITZERLAND BELGIUM GREECE KYRGYZSTAN POLAND TURKEY BERMUDA GUINEA LATVIA PORTUGAL UKRAINE BOSNIA AND HONG KONG LEBANON QATAR UNITED ARAB HERZEGOVINA HUNGARY LITHUANIA ROMANIA EMIRATES BRAZIL INDIA LUXEMBOURG RUSSIA UNITED KINGDOM BULGARIA INDONESIA MALAYSIA SAUDI ARABIA UNITED STATES CAMEROON IRAN MALTA SERBIA USA CANADA IRAQ MAURITIUS SINGAPORE UZBEKISTAN CHINA IRELAND MOROCCO SLOVENIA YEMEN CYPRUS WHAT SOME OF THE ATTENDEES HAD TO SAY “Capacity Middle East is one of the key events in the calendar. The attendance level is always very good in both num- “We are here at Capacity Middle East ber and seniority and it’s a great place as usual to meet our customers - the to be” old ones and the new” Ivan Botta Carl Roberts CEO CCO ENTER SRL EPSILON TELECOMMUNICATIONS “Capacity Middle East offers a great platform to meet with our clients. It’s a great opportuni- ty to meet a lot of new partners and connec- tions and grow the business.
    [Show full text]
  • Abkürzungs-Liste ABKLEX
    Abkürzungs-Liste ABKLEX (Informatik, Telekommunikation) W. Alex 1. Juli 2021 Karlsruhe Copyright W. Alex, Karlsruhe, 1994 – 2018. Die Liste darf unentgeltlich benutzt und weitergegeben werden. The list may be used or copied free of any charge. Original Point of Distribution: http://www.abklex.de/abklex/ An authorized Czechian version is published on: http://www.sochorek.cz/archiv/slovniky/abklex.htm Author’s Email address: [email protected] 2 Kapitel 1 Abkürzungen Gehen wir von 30 Zeichen aus, aus denen Abkürzungen gebildet werden, und nehmen wir eine größte Länge von 5 Zeichen an, so lassen sich 25.137.930 verschiedene Abkür- zungen bilden (Kombinationen mit Wiederholung und Berücksichtigung der Reihenfol- ge). Es folgt eine Auswahl von rund 16000 Abkürzungen aus den Bereichen Informatik und Telekommunikation. Die Abkürzungen werden hier durchgehend groß geschrieben, Akzente, Bindestriche und dergleichen wurden weggelassen. Einige Abkürzungen sind geschützte Namen; diese sind nicht gekennzeichnet. Die Liste beschreibt nur den Ge- brauch, sie legt nicht eine Definition fest. 100GE 100 GBit/s Ethernet 16CIF 16 times Common Intermediate Format (Picture Format) 16QAM 16-state Quadrature Amplitude Modulation 1GFC 1 Gigabaud Fiber Channel (2, 4, 8, 10, 20GFC) 1GL 1st Generation Language (Maschinencode) 1TBS One True Brace Style (C) 1TR6 (ISDN-Protokoll D-Kanal, national) 247 24/7: 24 hours per day, 7 days per week 2D 2-dimensional 2FA Zwei-Faktor-Authentifizierung 2GL 2nd Generation Language (Assembler) 2L8 Too Late (Slang) 2MS Strukturierte
    [Show full text]
  • UK Broadband Speeds, May 2010: Research Report
    UK Broadband Speeds, May 2010: Research report w. UK broadband speeds, May 2010 The performance of fixed-line broadband delivered to UK residential consumers Research Report Publication date: 27 July 2010 UK Broadband Speeds, May 2010: Research report Contents Section Page Using this report 2 1 Executive summary 5 2 Introduction 9 3 Objectives and methodology 15 4 Overview of broadband speeds 19 5 Variation of speeds by geographical location 33 6 Variation of speeds by time of day 40 7 Variation of speeds by access technology 44 8 Variation of speeds by internet service provider (ISP) package 48 9 Other metrics affecting performance 74 10 Conclusion and next steps 84 Annex Page 1 Glossary 86 2 Technical methodology 89 3 Statistical methodology 92 4 Significance testing 102 1 UK Broadband Speeds, May 2010: Research report Using this report Purpose of this report In order to understand the performance of UK fixed-line residential broadband connections, we commissioned research to identify the average actual download throughput speeds that they deliver, along with a number of other metrics, which determine the consumer experience of using broadband services. This report builds on the first round of research conducted between October 2008 and April 2009 and published in reports of January 2009 and July 20091 and sets out our findings for the first month of data collection (May 2010) from this second phase of research. The current research will continue until April 2012, and we expect to publish further reports at roughly six-monthly intervals. The results provide extremely useful insights into the factors that affect and determine broadband performance, but with the following limitations: • The information presented in this report relates to broadband speeds and other performance measures such as upload speeds, latency, jitter, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Exchange Points 2013 Report Contents
    Internet Exchange Points 2013 Report Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................3 1.2 Notes on this report ...............................................................................................................................3 1.3 Internet Exchange Point ........................................................................................................................4 1.4 About Euro-IX ........................................................................................................................................4 1.5 List of Euro-IX Affiliates .........................................................................................................................5 1.6 Participants distribution at Euro-IX member IXPs.................................................................................7 1.7 Evolution since 2007 ..............................................................................................................................8 2. European IXP growth since 1993 ..............................................................................................................9 2.1 IXP Trends in Europe since 1993 ...........................................................................................................9 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • International Economic Law and the Digital Divide : a New Silk Road? Kariyawasam, Rohan
    International economic law and the digital divide : a new silk road? Kariyawasam, Rohan The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/2683 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW AND THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: A NEW SILK ROAD? A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD ROHAN KARIYAWASAM Queen Mary College University of London ABSTRACT The failure of the trade negotiations at Seattle, and the collapse of the negotiations at Doha have bought increased attention to the issue of development, aid, and the implementation of special and differential rights in favour of developing countries. This thesis looks to examine one aspect of the many issues facing developed and developing countries in the negotiations that lie ahead, specifically how international economic law can be used in the application of technological processes to help address the Digital Divide. At present, there is an emphasis on development and the needs of developing countries, and that such development needs to be sustainable. Research reviewed in Chapter 2 indicates that growing information technology levels leads to growth of GDP. Importantly the use of ICT‘s will foster growth in the trade of electronic goods and services (electronic intangibles).
    [Show full text]
  • Krakow 2020 Get Ready for Trending Topics
    The PEERING CONFERENCE for Central and Eastern Europe 17TH-19TH MARCH 2020 KRAKOW POLAND | ICE KRAKOW CONGRESS CENTRE HOSTED BY: 17TH-19TH MARCH 2020 KRAKOW POLAND | ICE KRAKOW CONGRESS CENTRE THE LARGEST PEERING CONFERENCE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE On the 17th and 19th March the Peering Days in Krakow will connect network engineers, peering coordinators, internet providers, cloud administrators, and data centre operators from Central and Eastern Europe. The participants come from across the globe in order to get access to expert knowledge, gain valuable connections and to be part of a two day enlivening experience. FACT SHEET DATE / LOCATION 17th March 2020 Technical Workshop and Welcome Evening 18th - 19th March 2019 Peering Days Conference with Social Evening • 250 participants expected in Krakow • 30+ different countries of attendees • 100+ different companies attend the event annually • 40%+ of delegates are decision makers • 50% of conference time reserved for bilateral meetings Technical Workshop KRAKOW 2020 GET READY FOR TRENDING TOPICS: [ 01 ] DDOS [ 05 ] Internet Governance [ 02 ] BCP38 [ 06 ] Routing Security [ 03 ] DNSSEC/RPKI [ 07 ] RIPE Database [ 04 ] IPv6 [ 08 ] Tools KRAKOW 2020 Social Coffee Welcome IXP Gold Silver Lunch Coffee Bar Evening Break Evening Conference packages - details Category Partner Partner Sponsor Sponsor Sponsor Sponsor Sponsor Price in EUR excluding VAT 7.000 7.000 5.000 4.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 20’ presentation in the MAIN HALL Expo space Company logo and link on conference website List of attendees Promo materials in welcome bags Company logo permanently displayed at conference MAIN HALL Company logo permanently displayed during Social Evening Company logo displayer during Welcome Evening Complimentary conference seats 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 Promo Codes* 12 10 4 2 0 0 0 0 *You will receive the following number of Promo Codes to your business partners (content or ISP networks only), allowing them to attend the conference free of charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Interconnections on the Internet: Exchange Points Keith Mitchell CTO, Xchangepoint
    Interconnections on the Internet: Exchange Points Keith Mitchell CTO, XchangePoint RIPE NCC Regional Meeting Dubai, 7th Dec 2003 Outline of Presentation Introduction Internet Interconnect Principles Internet Exchange Technologies Internet Exchange Governance Models Setting up an Internet Exchange Speaker’s Background Founder of UK’s first commercial ISP, PIPEX, 1992-1996 Founder and Executive Chairman of London Internet Exchange, LINX, 1994-2000 First chair of RIPE EIX Working Group Founder and CTO of first pan-European commercial IXP operator, XchangePoint, 2000- XchangePoint currently operates IXPs in London and Hamburg, shortly deploying in Frankfurt and Amsterdam What happens at an Internet Exchange Point ? Multiple ISPs locate backbone IP router nodes in single building operated by co-location provider In-building connections to shared interconnect fabric using Ethernet LAN switching technology over point-to-point private interconnections Routing information is exchanged bi-laterally between ISPs using BGP Exchange operator may or may not be same organisation as co-location provider Co-location provider will generally have other customers: carriers, hosting, ASPs, content distributors IXP Advantages • Single large pipe to the IXP more efficient than many smaller pipes to many ISPs ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP IXPIXP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISPISP ISP = Internet Service Provider IXP = Internet eXchange Point IXP Advantages Keeps domestic traffic within a country/region without having to take indirect international
    [Show full text]
  • The OFT's Decision on Reference Under Section 33(1)
    Anticipated merger between Level 3 Communications Inc and Global Crossing Limited ME/5025/11 The OFT’s decision on reference under section 33(1) given on 30 August 2011. Full text of decision published 6 September 2011. Please note that the square brackets indicate figures or text which have been deleted or replaced in ranges at the request of the parties or third parties for reasons of commercial confidentiality. PARTIES 1. Level 3 Communications Inc (Level 3) is a US company which offers a range of communications services. Within Europe these are predominately at the wholesale level related to its infrastructure. Its fibre optic network covers North America and Europe (including transatlantic subsea cables). 2. The parties have categorised Level 3's activities into Internet connectivity services, global telecommunications services (GTS) and carrier services. It also offers content delivery network services. 3. Level 3's 2010 worldwide turnover was £[ ] of which £[ ] was earned in the UK. 4. Global Crossing Limited (Global Crossing) is a Bermuda registered company which offers a range of communications services. Global Crossing has a more extensive fibre optic network than does Level 3. Its network covers North, Central and South America, Europe, parts of Asia and the Pacific. It also has transatlantic subsea cables. In all, its network is present in 70 countries and serves more than 700 cities worldwide. 1 5. Global Crossing provides Internet connectivity services, GTS and carrier services. 6. Last year, Global Crossing's turnover was around £[ ] of which £[ ] was earned in the UK. TRANSACTION 7. On 10 April 2011 the parties signed an Amalgamation Agreement.
    [Show full text]