DOCSLIB.ORG

Interconnection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interconnection Interconnection 101 As cloud usage takes off, data production grows exponentially, content pushes closer to the edge, and end users demand data and applications at all hours from all locations, the ability to connect with a wide variety of players becomes ever more important. This report introduces interconnection, its key players and busi- ness models, and trends that could affect interconnection going forward. KEY FINDINGS Network-dense, interconnection-oriented facilities are not easy to replicate and are typically able to charge higher prices for colocation, as well as charging for cross-connects and, in some cases, access to public Internet exchange platforms and cloud platforms. Competition is increasing, however, and competitors are starting the long process of creating network-dense sites. At the same time, these sites are valuable and are being acquired, so the sector is consolidating. Having facili- ties in multiple markets does seem to provide some competitive advantage, particularly if the facilities are similar in look and feel and customers can monitor them all from a single portal and have them on the same contract. Mobility, the Internet of Things, services such as SaaS and IaaS (cloud), and content delivery all depend on net- work performance. In many cases, a key way to improve network performance is to push content, processing and peering closer to the edge of the Internet. This is likely to drive demand for facilities in smaller markets that offer interconnection options. We also see these trends continuing to drive demand for interconnection facilities in the larger markets as well. © 2015 451 RESEARCH, LLC AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. AUG 2015 I 451 RESEARCH ABOUT 451 RESEARCH 451 Research is a preeminent information technology research and advisory company. With a core focus on technology innovation and market disruption, we provide essential insight for leaders of the digital economy. More than 100 analysts and consultants deliver that insight via syndicated research, advisory services and live events to over 1,000 client organizations in North America, Europe and around the world. Founded in 2000 and headquartered in New York, 451 Research is a division of The 451 Group. © 2015 451 Research, LLC and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction and distribution of this publication, in whole or in part, in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The terms of use regarding distribution, both internally and externally, shall be governed by the terms laid out in your Service Agreement with 451 Research and/or its Affiliates. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. 451 Research disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although 451 Research may discuss legal issues related to the information technology business, 451 Research does not provide legal advice or services and their research should not be construed or used as such. 451 Research shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpreta- tions thereof. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. New York London 20 West 37th Street, 6th Floor Paxton House (5th floor), 30 Artillery Lane New York, NY 10018 London, E1 7LS, UK Phone: 212.505.3030 Phone: +44 (0) 207 426 0219 Fax: 212.505.2630 Fax: +44 (0) 207 426 4698 San Francisco Boston 140 Geary Street, 9th Floor 1 Liberty Square, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Boston, MA 02109 Phone: 415.989.1555 Phone: 617.275.8818 Fax: 415.989.1558 Fax: 617.261.0688 © 2015 451 RESEARCH, LLC AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. II Interconnection 101 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION . .1 1.2 KEY FINDINGS . .1 1.3 METHODOLOGY . .1 SECTION 2: WHAT IS INTERCONNECTION, AND WHERE DOES IT COME FROM? 3 2.1 CARRIER-NEUTRAL DATACENTER VS MEET-ME ROOM . .4 Figure 1: Carrier-Neutral Datacenter Compared with Meet-Me Room . 4 2.2 INTERCONNECTING THE INTERNET . .5 2.2.1 Private Interconnection . 5 Figure 2: Internet Transit . 6 Figure 3: Private Peering . 7 Figure 4: Internet Transit Plus Peering . 9 2.2.2 Public Interconnection or Public Peering . 9 Figure 5: Public Peering Platform . 10 Figure 6: Public Peering in the US vs. Europe . 10 SECTION 3: INTERCONNECTION AS A BUSINESS 11 3.1 COMPONENTS . 11 3.1.1 The Building . 11 3.1.2 Bandwidth . 12 3.1.3 Cross-Connects . 12 3.1.4 Public Peering Platform . 12 3.1.5 Access to Other Customers in the Facility, Particularly Cloud Providers. .12 3.1.6 Additional Services. .12 3.2 SUPPLY AND DEMAND . 13 3.2.1 Supply . 13 3.2.2 Demand . 14 3.3 CUSTOMERS . 15 Figure 7: Customers of Interconnection Facilities . 15 Figure 8: Drivers of Facility Selection. .17 © 2015 451 RESEARCH, LLC AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. III 451 RESEARCH SECTION 4: INTERCONNECTION PROVIDERS 18 Figure 9: 451 Research Interconnect Market MapTM . 18 Figure 10: Interconnection Provider Segments. .19 Figure 11: Summary Chart: Market Challenges and Innovations . 21 SECTION 5: EVOLUTION OF INTERCONNECTION: TRENDS AND DISRUPTORS 22 5.1 CONTINUED GROWTH OF INTERNET TRAFFIC AND THE NEED FOR INTERCONNECTION . 22 5.2 INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF FIRMS INTERCONNECTING . 22 5.3 GROWING REQUIREMENT FOR INTERNET CONNECTIVITY AT THE EDGE . 23 5.4 CLOUD’S IMPACT ON INTERCONNECTION . 24 5.5 NET NEUTRALITY . 26 5.6 ‘PRIVATIZATION’ OF THE INTERNET . 26 5.7 COMPETITIVE CHANGES . 27 5.7.1 Open-IX . 27 5.7.2 European Exchanges in the US . .28 5.7.3 Additional Competition . 28 5.8 TECHNOLOGY TRENDS . 29 SECTION 6: THE 451 TAKE 30 APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY 31 APPENDIX B: KEY CARRIER HOTELS IN NORTH AMERICAN MARKETS 33 APPENDIX C: LOCATIONS FOR DIRECT CONNECTIONS TO CLOUD PROVIDERS 34 AWS Direct Connect Locations. .34 Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute Locations. .34 APPENDIX D: OPEN-IX CERTIFIED PROVIDERS 35 INDEX OF COMPANIES 36 © 2015 451 RESEARCH, LLC AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 1 451 RESEARCH SECTION 1 Executive Summary 1.1 INTRODUCTION Interconnection has come a long way since telecommunications providers connected their networks in order to exchange voice traffic. Now, in addition to carriers, many other kinds of firms need to connect with each other to exchange data traffic, and interconnection itself has become a business. Facilities where the largest number of firms can meet have become extremely valuable. This report looks at the business of interconnection and discusses trends that are likely to impact it going forward. 1.2 KEY FINDINGS • Network-dense, interconnection-oriented facilities are not easy to replicate and are typically able to charge higher prices for colocation, as well as charging for cross-connects and, in some cases, access to public Internet exchange platforms and cloud platforms. • Competition is increasing, however, and competitors are starting the long process of creating network-dense sites. At the same time, these sites are valuable and are being acquired, so the sector is consolidating. Having facilities in multiple markets does seem to provide some competitive advantage, particularly if the facilities are similar in look and feel and customers can monitor them all from a single portal and have them on the same contract. • Mobility, the Internet of Things, services such as SaaS and IaaS (cloud), and content delivery all depend on network performance. In many cases, a key way to improve network performance is to push content, processing and peering closer to the edge of the Internet. This is likely to drive demand for facilities in smaller markets that offer interconnection options. We also see these trends continuing to drive demand for interconnection facilities in the larger markets as well. 1.3 METHODOLOGY This report on interconnection services is based on a series of in-depth interviews with a variety of stakeholders in the industry, including technology vendors, surveys and interviews of IT managers at end-user organizations across multiple sectors, datacenter service providers and providers of connectivity services. This research was supplemented by additional primary research, including attendance at trade shows and industry events. Please note that the names of vendors and service providers are meant to serve as illustrative examples of trends and competitive strategies; company lists are comprehensive, but are not intended to be exhaustive. The inclusion (or absence) of a company name in the report does not necessarily constitute endorsement. © 2015 451 RESEARCH, LLC AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 Interconnection 101 Reports such as this one represent a holistic perspective on key emerging markets in the enterprise IT space. These markets evolve quickly, so 451 Research offers additional services that provide critical marketplace updates. These updated reports and perspec- tives are presented on a daily basis via the company’s core intelligence service, 451 Research Market Insight. Forward-looking M&A analysis and perspectives on strategic acquisitions and the liquidity environment for technology companies are also updated regularly via 451 Market Insight, which is backed by the industry-leading 451 Research M&A KnowledgeBase. Emerging technologies and markets are also covered in additional 451 Research chan- nels, including Datacenter Technology; Enterprise Storage; Systems and Systems Manage- ment; Enterprise Networking; Enterprise Security; Data Platforms & Analytics; Dev, Devops & Middleware; Business Aps (Social Business); Managed Services and Hosting; Cloud Services; MTDC; Enterprise Mobility; and Mobile Telecom. Beyond that, 451 Research has a robust set of quantitative insights covered in products such as ChangeWave, TheInfoPro, Market Monitor, the M&A KnowledgeBase and the Datacenter KnowledgeBase. All of these 451 Research services, which are accessible via the Web, provide critical and timely analysis specifically focused on the business of enterprise IT innovation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Data Center Specifications: LAX6
    ™ LAX6 Los Angeles, CA Data Center Specifications: LAX6 Building LAX6 received a complete overhaul in 1999, and stands out as one of the premier west coast data center facilities. LAX6 is Tier III, SAS 70 Type II Certified and highly scalable to suit the needs of our valued customers. ANEXIO’s downtown LA data center offers best in class power, cooling, connectivity, security and redundancy for mission critical computing and network infrastructures. Location LAX6 is conveniently situated right in the heart of the telecom district in metropolitan Los Angeles. It’s a short ride from many local restaurants, hotels, and areas of interest, and is easily accessible LOCATION: Los Angeles, CA from Los Angeles International Airport. BUILDING SIZE: 67,000 usable SF NEAREST AIRPORT: LAX Facility Specifications UTILITY POWER: Up to 22kW per cabinet BUILDING DESCRIPTION: 7 stories, 490,000 SF FLOORING: 18” raised, 2’x 2’ floor FLOOD ZONE: Outside 500 year flood plan plates UTILITY POWER: Capacity: 18 MVA FIRE PROTECTION: Double interlock pre-action system and heat & smoke SEISMIC ZONE: detection Category D UPS POWER CAPACITY: LOADING DOCK: Accommodates tractor 7.45 MW Critical IT Load trailers, no height restrictions UPS REDUNDANCY: N+1 POWER DENSITY: 96W per SF DC POWER CAPACITY: 2 x 800A 48VDC systems configured as N+1 PARKING: 155 spots Contact Us | [email protected] | http://www.ANEXIO.com | 2019 ANEXIO ™ LAX6 Los Angeles, CA FIBER AND BUILDING ENTRY: Multiple Diverse Entry Points COOLING REDUNDANCY: N+1 Carriers • 360 Networks Security • Ascent Media Group • Baldwin County Internet, DSSI Service BUILDING AND PERIMETER: On-premise 24x7 security staffing • Bandwidth.com ACCESS CONTROL: Keycard/biometric scanner • Broadwing Communications • Calpop.com MONITORING: CCTV monitoring & recording of secure areas • CBS and entrances • Centauri Communications • Cyberverse, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • PEERING: an AS for Us
    PEERING: An AS for Us Brandon Schlinker1, Kyriakos Zarifis1, Italo Cunha2, Nick Feamster3, and Ethan Katz-Bassett1 1University of Southern California — 2Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais — 3Georgia Institute of Technology {bschlink, kyriakos, ethan.kb}@usc.edu — [email protected] — [email protected] ABSTRACT 29, 45]. BGP, the Internet’s interdomain routing protocol, Internet routing suffers from persistent and transient failures, can experience slow convergence [30] and persistent route circuitous routes, oscillations, and prefix hijacks. A ma- oscillations [17,54]. It lacks mechanisms to prevent spoof- jor impediment to progress is the lack of ways to conduct ing [5,27] and prefix hijacks [24,32,58]. Despite known impactful interdomain research. Most research is based ei- problems, little has changed with interdomain routing, and ther on passive observation of existing routes, keeping re- there has been little impactful research in recent years. searchers from assessing how the Internet will respond to This stagnancy in the face of known problems is in stark route or policy changes; or simulations, which are restricted contrast to the rapid innovation in other areas of network- by limitations in our understanding of topology and policy. ing. We are in an era of remarkable changes in networking We propose a new class of interdomain research: re- and its role in our lives, as mobile connectivity and stream- searchers can instantiate an AS of their choice, including ing video change how we use the Internet, and advances in its intradomain topology and interdomain interconnectivity, software defined networking and data centers change how and connect it with the “live” Internet to exchange routes we run networks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of Private Equity-Backed Ipos and the Effect of M&A-Activity – a European Study
    Archive no: School of Economics and Management Department of Business and Administration FEKP90, Business Administration - Degree Project Master of Science in Business and Economics Spring term 2011, Lund The Performance of Private Equity-backed IPOs and the Effect of M&A-activity – A European Study Author: Linus Johansson Tutor: Rikard Larsson Abstract Title: The Performance of Private Equity-backed IPOs and the effect of M&A-activity – A European Study Seminar date: 2011-05-24 Course: Master Thesis in Business Administration, 30 University Credit Points (30 ECTS). Author: Linus Johansson Tutor: Rikard Larsson Five key words: BHAR, IPO, Performance, Private Equity, M&A Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate how private equity-backed IPOs perform once they go public. That is, to investigate whether or not these private equity firms have created highly competitive, high- performance portfolio companies and to see if the portfolio companies are able to retain those qualities even after going public. These results are then to be compared with previous research done on the general IPO and its short- and long-term performance. It also sets out to measure what effect M&A-activity during the fund holding period may have on the fund companies after being exited onto the public market. Methodology: The performance of the private equity-backed IPOs has been measured as the abnormal return using two methods, cumulative abnormal returns and buy-and-hold abnormal returns. Two types of benchmarks have been used, S&P Europe 350 as well as an industry-specific version of that index. Literature review: Theories used in this study are based partially on previous research on the private equity industry as well as general IPO-theory, such as long-term underperformance and the “hot issue” anomaly.
    [Show full text]
  • Hacking the Master Switch? the Role of Infrastructure in Google's
    Hacking the Master Switch? The Role of Infrastructure in Google’s Network Neutrality Strategy in the 2000s by John Harris Stevenson A thesis submitteD in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information University of Toronto © Copyright by John Harris Stevenson 2017 Hacking the Master Switch? The Role of Infrastructure in Google’s Network Neutrality Strategy in the 2000s John Harris Stevenson Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information University of Toronto 2017 Abstract During most of the decade of the 2000s, global Internet company Google Inc. was one of the most prominent public champions of the notion of network neutrality, the network design principle conceived by Tim Wu that all Internet traffic should be treated equally by network operators. However, in 2010, following a series of joint policy statements on network neutrality with telecommunications giant Verizon, Google fell nearly silent on the issue, despite Wu arguing that a neutral Internet was vital to Google’s survival. During this period, Google engaged in a massive expansion of its services and technical infrastructure. My research examines the influence of Google’s systems and service offerings on the company’s approach to network neutrality policy making. Drawing on documentary evidence and network analysis data, I identify Google’s global proprietary networks and server locations worldwide, including over 1500 Google edge caching servers located at Internet service providers. ii I argue that the affordances provided by its systems allowed Google to mitigate potential retail and transit ISP gatekeeping. Drawing on the work of Latour and Callon in Actor– network theory, I posit the existence of at least one actor-network formed among Google and ISPs, centred on an interest in the utility of Google’s edge caching servers and the success of the Android operating system.
    [Show full text]
  • Equinix Inc (Eqix) 10-Q
    EQUINIX INC (EQIX) 10-Q Quarterly report pursuant to sections 13 or 15(d) Filed on 04/27/2012 Filed Period 03/31/2012 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 000-31293 EQUINIX, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 77-0487526 (State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) One Lagoon Drive, Fourth Floor, Redwood City, California 94065 (Address of principal executive offices, including ZIP code) (650) 598-6000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) Yes x No ¨ and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Data Loss Prevention Shines 49
    ‘Corrective action’ for IT slacker 6 | Xen backers unite 11 | EMC buys e-discovery 12 A case for flash storage 45 | Where data loss prevention shines 49 THE BUSINESS VALUE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPT. 7, 2009 Hybrid Clouds The right formula’s slowly coming together p.15 Also: Hard data on 12 cloud providers p.37 informationweek.com [PLUS] THE INteRNet OF THINGS A special 16-page handbook A United Business Media Publication® CAN $5.95, US $4.95 p. HB1 Copyright 2009 United Business Media LLC. Important Note: This PDF is provided solely as a reader service. It is not intended for reproduction or public distribution. For article reprints, e-prints and permissions please contact: Wright’s Reprints, 1-877-652-5295 / [email protected] THE BUSINESS VALUE OFC TECHNOLOGYONTENTS Sept.7, 2009 Issue 1,240 2 Links COVER STORY Research And Connect InformationWeek’s Analytics Hybrid Clouds Reports, events, and more 15 Getting your data center to work with public cloud 6 Global CIO services isn’t easy By Bob Evans Virginia puts IT supplier on “corrective action plan”—we What’s In The should all be so lucky! 3377 Public Cloud 8 How 12 vendors are CIO Profiles delivering on infrastructure Availability Is Crucial as a service How good a service is doesn’t matter if customers can’t get to it, says VeriSign’s CTO Oracle Puts 11g On The Grid 11 QuickTakes Oracle upgrades database with VMware Wants It All data center grid features Vendor tries to get more cloud providers to use its software by 13 Google’s Down,Not Out challenging Xen When Gmail went offline,
    [Show full text]
  • Cologix Torix Case Study
    Internet Exchange Case Study The Toronto Internet Exchange (TorIX) is the largest IX in Canada with more than 175 peering participants benefiting from lower network costs & faster speeds The non-profit Toronto Internet Exchange (TorIX) is a multi-connection point enabling members to use one hardwired connection to exchange traffic with 175+ members on the exchange. With peering participants swapping traffic with one another through direct connections, TorIX reduces transit times for local data exchange and cuts the significant costs of Internet bandwidth. The success of TorIX is underlined by its tremendous growth, exceeding 145 Gbps as one of the largest IXs in the world. TorIX is in Cologix’s data centre at 151 Front Street, Toronto’s carrier hotel and the country’s largest telecommunications hub in the heart of Toronto. TorIX members define their own routing protocols to dictate their traffic flow, experiencing faster speeds with their data packets crossing fewer hops between the point of origin and destination. Additionally, by keeping traffic local, Canadian data avoids international networks, easing concerns related to privacy and security. Above: In Dec. 2014, TorIX traffic peaked above 140 Gbps, with average traffic hovering around 90 Gbps. Beginning Today Launched in July 1996 Direct TorIX on-ramp in Cologix’s151 Front Street Ethernet-based, layer 2 connectivity data centre in Toronto TorIX-owned switches capable of handling Second largest independent IX in North America ample traffic Operated by telecom industry volunteers IPv4 & IPv6 address provided to each peering Surpassed 145 Gbps with 175+ peering member to use on the IX participants, including the Canadian Broke the 61 Gbps mark in Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Van+ May 2014 Aw Layout 1
    ISSN 1745-1736 April / May 2014 Will CSPs maximise Volume 16 Issue 2 their potential in the cloud? How to win by playing to your strengths BIG DATA ANALYTICS CEM POLICY BILL & CHARGE 5G Can CSP data transform Does quality awareness Does it deliver business Why CSPs alone can Why it’s here and what performance? set CSPs apart? model flexibility? keep control of billing. it means for CSPs. VanillaPlus Insight VanillaPlus Insight VanillaPlus Insight VanillaPlus Insight VanillaPlus Insight out June 2014 out July 2014 out October 2014 out December 2014 out February 2015 PLUS: Astellia buys Ingenia Telecom • Cerillion survey heralds cloud billing • Openet and OpenCloud launch joint service definition system • Amdocs announces policy control for LTE • Hadoop can cut licencing costs by 70%, says cVidya • TeliaSonera chooses Ericsson for customer experience assurance • CSG International launches convergent billing into space with Inmarsat • Inside Vodacom’s Digital Route deployment • Read the latest news at www.vanillaplus.com technological enabler OF DEUTSCHE BÖRSE CLOUD EXCHANGE CONTENTS IN THIS ISSUE TALKING HEADS Thomas Vasen explains Will CSPs maximise why software in the cloud, 4 EDITOR’S COMMENT their potential in the for the cloud and enabling George Malim wonders when moving too slowly means you’ve reached the cloud? the cloud opens up end of the line opportunities for CSPs 5 INDUSTRY NEWS Astellia acquires Ingenia Telecom, Bytesphere element polling assets 22 bought by Exfo 6 MARKET NEWS Cerillion survey heralds cloud billing, Syniverse
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY PERFORMANCE 2012 ANNUAL REPORT THE WORL D’S BIGGEST CHALLEN GES DESERVE EVEN BIGGER SOLUTIONS. { POWERFUL ANSWERS } FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS $115.8 $33.4 $0.90 $2.20 $2.24 $1.975 $2.030 $110.9 $31.5 $0.85 $2.15 $1.925 $106.6 $29.8 $0.31 CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS REPORTED ADJUSTED DIVIDENDS REVENUES FROM OPERATING DILUTED EARNINGS DILUTED EARNINGS DECLARED PER (BILLIONS) ACTIVITIES PER SHARE PER SHARE SHARE (BILLIONS) (NON-GAAP) CORPORATE HIGHLIGHTS • $15.3 billion in free cash flow (non-GAAP) • 8.4% growth in wireless retail service revenue • 4.5% growth in operating revenues • 607,000 FiOS Internet subscriber net additions • 13.2% total shareholder return • 553,000 FiOS Video subscriber net additions • 3.0% annual dividend increase • 17.2% growth in FiOS revenue • 5.9 million wireless retail connection net additions • 6.3% growth in Enterprise Strategic Services revenue • 0.91% wireless retail postpaid churn Note: Prior-period amounts have been reclassified to reflect comparable results. See www.verizon.com/investor for reconciliations to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for the non-GAAP financial measures included in this annual report. In keeping with Verizon’s commitment to protect the environment, this report was printed on paper certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). By selecting FSC-certified paper, Verizon is making a difference by supporting responsible forest management practices. CHAIRMAN’S LETTER Dear Shareowner, 2012 was a year of accelerating momentum, for Verizon and the communications industry. The revolution in mobile, broadband and cloud networks picked up steam—continuing to disrupt and transform huge sectors of our society, from finance to entertainment to healthcare.
    [Show full text]
  • R Kirkstall Industrial Park Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Okhla Industrial Area Ph2 Leeds Ls4 2Az New Delhi 110020 United Kingdom India
    Case 2:16-bk-24862-BB Doc 535 Filed 04/06/17 Entered 04/06/17 11:59:47 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 70 1 Scott F. Gautier (State Bar No. 211742) [email protected] 2 Kevin D. Meek (State Bar No. 280562) [email protected] 3 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 4 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 310 552 0130 5 Facsimile: 310 229 5800 6 Attorneys for Debtor and Debtor in Possession 7 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOS ANGELES DIVISION 11 LLP AW L 12 In re: Case No. 2:16-bk-24862-BB T A 13 NG DIP INC. (f/k/a Nasty Gal Inc.), a Chapter 11 NGELES APLAN A California corporation, K OS 14 L PROOF OF SERICE RE NOTICE OF Debtor and Debtor in Possession. TTORNEYS MOTION AND MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A 15 ORDER APPROVING: (1) DISCLOSURE OBINS R 16 STATEMENT; (2) FORM AND MANNER OF NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION 17 HEARING; (3) FORM OF BALLOTS; AND (4) SOLICITATION MATERIALS AND 18 SOLICITATION PROCEDURES [DOCKET NO. 523] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 61316050.1 1 Case 2:16-bk-24862-BB Doc 535 Filed 04/06/17 Entered 04/06/17 11:59:47 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 70 Case 2:16-bk-24862-BB Doc 535 Filed 04/06/17 Entered 04/06/17 11:59:47 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 70 NG DIP INC. (f/k/aCase Nasty 2:16-bk-24862-BB Gal Inc.), a California Corporation Doc 535 - U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Peering Concepts and Definitions Terminology and Related Jargon
    Peering Concepts and Definitions Terminology and Related Jargon Presentation Overview Brief On Peering Jargon Peering & Related Jargon BRIEF ON PEERING JARGON Brief On Peering Jargon A lot of terminologies used in the peering game. We shall look at the more common ones. Will be directly related to peering, as well as ancillary non-peering functions that support peering. PEERING & RELATED JARGON Peering & Related Jargon ASN (or AS - Autonomous System Number): . A unique number that identifies a collection/grouping of IP addresses or networks under the control of one entity on the Internet Bi-lateral (peering): . Peering relationships setup “directly” between two networks (see “Multi-lateral [peering]”). BGP (Border Gateway Protocol): . Routing protocol used on the Internet and at exchange points as the de-facto routing technique to share routing information (IPs and prefixes) between networks or between ASNs Peering & Related Jargon Carrier-neutral (data centre): . A facility where customers can purchase network services from “any” other networks within the facility. Cold-potato routing: . A situation where a network retains traffic on its network for as long as possible (see “Hot-potato routing”). Co-lo (co-location): . Typically a data centre where customers can house their network/service infrastructure. Peering & Related Jargon Dark fibre: . Fibre pairs offered by the owner, normally on a lease basis, without any equipment at each end of it to “activate” it (see “Lit fibre”). Data centre: . A purpose-built facility that provides space, power, cooling and network facilities to customers. Demarc (Demarcation): . Typically information about a co-lo customer, e.g., rack number, patch panel and port numbers, e.t.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Fatpipe 02-03 Copy.Indd
    Extreme BY HUNTER NEWBY Measures Meet Me in L.A. Editors’ note: This is the second in a series looking Interconnection Guidelines at the dominant “meet me” facilities in 10 major Can customers order cross connects to any other Yes North American cities. Author Hunter Newby is meet area customer? executive vice president of TELx. He can be reached Is the average turnaround time for cross connects Yes at [email protected]. 48 hours or less? Los Angeles is the single most important place for Is on-site technical support available 24/7/365? Yes major carrier interconnections on the West Coast, much Can customers access the site 24/7/365? Yes as New York is key on the East Coast. As is the case in Can the technicians test and turn up circuits? Yes most major cities, there are numerous carrier hotels in Does the meet area operator perform the cross con- Yes the Los Angeles area. But one site generally is agreed nect? to stand above the rest. Can the customer perform the cross connect? Yes The One Wilshire building is home to more than 100 Are all cross connects tagged and inventoried? Yes carriers and is the key gateway for Pacific Rim service Is there a shared fiber panel (MDF, CFDP)? Yes providers. One Wilshire earns the distinction of being one of the best carrier hotels due to its meet me room Can the customer bring and install its own fiber dis- Yes and overall carrier tenant accessibility. The One Wilshire tribution panels? meet me room also is one of the longest operating sites Is there a shared COAX or copper panel? Yes in the entire industry.
    [Show full text]