WEEKLY CONSTRUCTION NEWSLETTER Venue Photos: Construction Activities for the Week

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

WEEKLY CONSTRUCTION NEWSLETTER Venue Photos: Construction Activities for the Week: MILESTONE DATES • Set equipment curbs • forBegin back demo bar work in March 2018– Public equipmentthe Grand Americana at Lola’s opening of Lola’s Tap TaphouseGrill by isolating. House. • Beginelectrical, setting gas exterior and 11/20 11/13 brickplumbing. at the Porch for MONDAY MONDAY Lola’s Taphouse. November 2018 – Restart work on the Gaming Floor • Continue placing wall • Begin prep work for tile in main seating placing quarry tile in area of Lola’s the New Cooler. Taphouse. 11/21 11/14 TUESDAY TUESDAY • Begin demoing walls, soffits and flooring in the Grand Americana • Hang new FRP in back Grill. of house spaces for • Begin work in Lola’s Taphouse. 11/15 FUN FACTS 11/22 landscaping around the Pool. WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY 75 years to the day, an era was ending for the United States Navy. This era was the time when the mighty battleships ruled the seas as the most formidable weapons created by man. In The Second Naval Battle of Guadalcanal we would see the last time that the US Navy Battleships would fight head to head against an enemy battleship. This fateful clash would take place off of Savo Island in the waters known as “Iron bottom Sound” during the Guadalcanal campaign. A rag tag group of • Begin placing tile at four destroyers and the two battleships, USS Washington and USS South Dakota, would face off the New Cooler 11/23 11/16 against the Japanese battleship Kirishima and her force of destroyers and Cruisers. During the THURSDAY THURSDAY middle of the night the Japanese would identify the American task force and engage them at nearly point blank range just after 12:15 am. During this they would severely damage or sink the American destroyers and knock the South Dakota out of action. With the Washington left • Begin setting Floor Tile untouched, she would be able to lock on to the Kirishima open fire with her 16” main guns and her for bars and servers stations Lola’s secondary guns, setting the Kirishima a blaze and causing severe flooding that would cause her to Taphouse. 11/24 11/17 capsize. FRIDAY FRIDAY 15th November 2017 ISSUE 78.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

U.S. Navy Ships-Of-The-Line
U.S. Navy – Ships-of-the-line A Frigate vs A Ship-of-the-Line: What’s the difference? FRIGATE: A vessel of war which is: 1) “ship” rigged, i.e. – with at least three masts (fore, main, & mizzen) & each mast carries the horizontal yards from which the principle sails are set; 2) this “ship-rigged vessel of war” is a FRIGATE because it has one covered, principle gun deck – USS Constitution is therefore a FRIGATE by class (illus. left) SHIP-OF-THE-LINE: A vessel of war which is: 1) “ship” rigged (see above); 2) this “ship-rigged vessel of war” is a SHIP-OF-THE-LINE because it has two or more covered gun decks – HMS Victory is therefore a SHIP-OF-THE-LINE by class (illus. right) HMS Victory (1765); 100+ guns; 820 officers Constitution preparing to battle Guerriere, & crew; oldest commissioned warship in the M.F. Corne, 1812 – PEM Coll. world, permanently dry docked in England Pg. 1 NMM Coll. An Act, 2 January 1813 – for the construction of the U.S. Navy’s first Ships-of-the-line USS Independence was the first ship-of-the-line launched for the USN from the Boston (Charlestown) Navy Yard on 22 June 1814: While rated for 74-guns, Independence was armed with 87 guns when she was launched. USS Washington was launched at the Portsmouth Navy Yard, 1 October 1814 USS Pennsylvania – largest sailing warship built for the USN USS Pennsylvania – rated for 136 guns on three covered gun decks + guns on her upper (spar) deck – the largest sailing warship ever built.
[Show full text]
HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 2001-4654, by Representatives Mcmorris, Sump, Cairnes, B
HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 2001-4654, by Representatives McMorris, Sump, Cairnes, B. Chandler, Roach, Casada, Skinner, Hunt, Ahern, Esser, Marine, Pearson, Ericksen and Conway WHEREAS, The U.S.S. Washington, a battleship citizen of the state of Washington, was officially launched on June 1, 1940, and was formally commissioned on May 15, 1941, with Captain Howard H.J. Benson in command; and WHEREAS, The U.S.S. Washington, while serving for four months in early 1942 with the British Home Fleet at Flagship Task Force 39, escorted convoys to Murmansk and Archangel, Russia; and WHEREAS, The U.S.S. Washington served in numerous bombardments, battles, and air strikes, including the Bombardment of Nauru, the Battles for Leyte Gulf, and the Air Strikes on Kyushu; and WHEREAS, The U.S.S. Washington served a total of thirty-eight months in combat zones, damaged three enemy cruisers and a destroyer, sank a battleship, a destroyer, and an oil tanker, and shot down twelve enemy planes, bombarded ten enemy islands, and repelled fifty-three air attacks; and WHEREAS, The U.S.S. Washington won a classic ship-to-ship duel with the Japanese Battleship Kirishima and sunk Destroyer Ayanami on November 14-15, 1942, becoming the first U.S. battleship to fight an enemy destroyer and the only one to ever singly destroy one; and WHEREAS, The U.S.S. Washington, while being the only U.S. battleship in the Pacific, patrolled enemy waters for five weeks alone, set a record steaming 31,494 miles in seventy-nine straight days, steamed 289,609 miles in World War II alone, fueled destroyers fifty-nine times, was fueled sixteen times itself, and sank more combat tonnage than any other U.S.
[Show full text]
THE JERSEYMAN Remembering USS UTAH
Remembering USS UTAH... 2nd Quarter 2009 "Rest well, yet sleep lightly and hear the call, if again sounded, to provide firepower for freedom…” THE JERSEYMAN 7 Years - Nr. 62 USS UTAH (BB-31/AG-16) Ship’s bell on display at the University of Utah, in Salt Lake City Keel laid down March 1909 at New York Shipbuilding, Camden, N.J. Sunk during Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor - Dec 7, 1941 Photo courtesy of RMCM William Hughes, USN/Retired Grand Prairie, Texas (Radioman 3/c crewman aboard USS UTAH - December 7, 1941) 2 The Jerseyman The Music of World War II... For those of us that remember the big bands of the 1940‟s, and stirring World War II songs with lyrics we could actually understand, you may want to check out this website: http://www.6thcorpsmusic.us/ Vera Lynn - “Land Of Hope and Glory”, Jimmy Durante - “I‟ll Be Seeing You”, “Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition”, “Bluebirds Over the White Cliffs of Dover”, “Joltin‟ Joe Dimaggio”, and “Bless „em all” by Bing Crosby... they‟re all here. To hear what the German side was listening to during the war, you can find a powerful “Panzerlied”, and “Lili Marlene”. More than 200 songs, and all are downloadable at no cost. Marion Chard, who‟s father served in the European Theater of Operations (ETO), put together these musical memories in honor of her father and his World War II service with the VI Corps - 540th Combat Engineers. We ask readers to please let Marion know if you enjoyed these songs.
[Show full text]
South Dakota Damage Analysis
South Dakota Damage Analysis Damage Review Tabulation of all hits The projectiles that caused each Hit as estimated in this essay: Hit 1 – 6-inch Type 0 HE or Type 4 base-fuzed Common projectile Hit 2 – 14-inch Type 0 HE projectile Hit 3 – 6-inch Type 0 HE or 5.5-inch Type 2 HE projectile Hit 4 – 8-inch Type 91 AP projectile Hit 5 – 8-inch Type 0 HE projectile Hit 6 – 8-inch Type 91 AP projectile Hit 7 – 5.5-inch base-fuzed Common projectile Hit 8 – 5.5-inch base-fuzed Common projectile Hit 9 – 8-inch Type 91 AP projectile Hit 10 – 8-inch Type 91 AP projectile Hit 11 – 14-inch Type 0 HE projectile Hit 12 – 5.5-inch base-fuzed Common projectile Hit 13 – 6-inch Type 4 base-fuzed Common projectile Hit 14 – 6-inch Type 4 base-fuzed Common projectile Hit 15 – 14-inch Type 3 Incendiary AA projectile Hit 16 – 6-inch Type 4 base-fuzed Common projectile Hit 17 – 8-inch Type 91 AP projectile Hit 18 – 6-inch Type 4 base-fuzed Common projectile Hit 19 – 5.5-inch base-fuzed Common projectile or 6-inch Type 4 Common projectile Hit 20 – 6-inch Type 4 base fuze Common projectile Hit 21 – 14-inch Type 1 AP cap head and windscreen Hit 22 – 5-inch Type 0 HE projectile Hit 23 – 14-inch Type 3 Incendiary AA projectile Hit 24 – 6-inch Type 0 HE projectile Hit 25 – 8-inch Type 91 AP projectile Hit 26 – 14-inch Type 1 AP projectile Hit 27 – 5-inch Type 0 HE projectile or fragment damage South_Dakota_Damage_Analysis.docx 3 October 2010 Page 158 South Dakota Damage Analysis Figure 118 – Hits on South Dakota as estimated by BuShips Plate 1 from BuShips War Damage
[Show full text]
WW2 – Guadalcanal Campaign
Guadalcanal 1942-43 COL Mark D. Harris 5 Dec 2013 Objectives • Learn about the Guadalcanal campaign. • Identify and discuss good and poor decisions and actions made by both sides during the campaign. • Draw parallels between their experience and modern military experience, especially military medicine. • Teach others the lessons learned. Strategic Situation - Allied • “Germany first” policy – 70% of US resources were against Germany, only 30% against Japan. • US did not have land, sea or air parity with Japan but was getting close to it. • US needed to support Australia because they were in danger and because Australia provided a bulwark against Japan in the Pacific. • Coast watchers in the Solomon Islands provided early notice of Japanese sea and air movements. Axis Division of the World (as considered in January 1942) Strategic Situation - Japanese • Recently lost four carriers at the Battle of Midway, their first major setback of the war. • Goal was to capture the major allied base at Port Moresby in New Guinea, thereby threatening Australia. • IJN wanted to occupy Guadalcanal to interdict US delivery of troops and supplies from Hawaii to Australia. • IJA wanted to concentrate forces for Port Moresby operation. Battle for Port Moresby 1942 Kokoda Track Operational Situation - Guadalcanal • Island in the Solomon chain 90 miles long and 25 miles wide. • No natural harbors, and south coast covered by coral reefs so only approach by sea is from the north. • Topography – mountains to 8000 feet, dormant volcanos, steep ravines, deep streams, and jungle. • Public Health threats – malaria, dengue, fungal, heat injury. • British protectorate since 1893 – Natives generally expected to be friendly.
[Show full text]
Kirishima Damage Analysis
All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the author. Kirishima Damage Analysis By Robert Lundgren Edited by Tony DiGiulian Kirishima in March 1940 at Kure, Japan Photograph from Japanese Naval Warship Photo Album: Battleships and Battle Cruisers, edited by Kazushige Todaka Kirishima_Damage_Analysis.doc 28 September 2010 Page 1 Kirishima Damage Analysis 1. Introduction There were only two battleship vs. battleship actions in the Pacific during World War II. Kirishima’s duel with Washington and South Dakota on 14-15 November 1942 was the first of these actions. This pitted two of the most modern and newest US battleships against one of Japan’s oldest battleships. For a detailed report on this action, see Battleship_Action_Guadalcanal.pdf. What has been written about her final hours has largely been taken from a single USSBS Interrogation of Lt.Cdr. Tokuno Horishi. In this report Horishi writes that Kirishima received nine 16-inch shell hits and forty 5-inch shell hits and that Captain Iwabuchi had Kirishima scuttled. The estimate of nine major caliber hits was consistent with Admiral Lee’s estimate of eight 16-inch shell hits documented in his action report to Admiral Nimitz. There however was no information on the location of these hits or the damage suffered. There was no information on what attempts were made to save her after the battle if any. Kirishima’s story is still largely a mystery though she plays a huge role in the most important battle of the war.
[Show full text]
United States Navy Carrier Air Group 12 History
CVG-12 USN Air 1207 October 1945 United States Navy Carrier Air Group 12 (CVG-12) Copy No. 2 History FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY This document is the property of the Government of the United States and is issued for the information of its Forces operating in the Pacific Theatre of Operations. 1 Original (Oct 45) PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com CVG-12 USN Air 1207 October 1945 Intentionally Blank 2 Original (Oct 45) PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com CVG-12 USN Air 1207 October 1945 CONTENTS CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................3 USS Saratoga Embarkation..............................................................................................4 OPERATION SHOESTRING 2 ....................................................................................................4 THE RABAUL RAIDS .....................................................................................................................5 First Strike - 5 November 1943............................................................................................................5 Second Strike - 11 November 1943......................................................................................................7 OPERATION GALVIN....................................................................................................................7
[Show full text]
Salvage Diary from 1 March – 1942 Through 15 November, 1943
Salvage Diary from 1 March – 1942 through 15 November, 1943 INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT WAR DIARY COLLECTION It is with deep gratitude to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in San Bruno, California for their kind permission in acquiring and referencing this document. Credit for the reproduction of all or part of its contents should reference NARA and the USS ARIZONA Memorial, National Park Service. Please contact Sharon Woods at the phone # / address below for acknowledgement guidelines. I would like to express my thanks to the Arizona Memorial Museum Association for making this project possible, and to the staff of the USS Arizona Memorial for their assistance and guidance. Invaluable assistance was provided by Stan Melman, who contributed most of the ship classifications, and Zack Anderson, who provided technical guidance and Adobe scans. Most of the Pacific Fleet Salvage that was conducted upon ships impacted by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor occurred within the above dates. The entire document will be soon be available through June, 1945 for viewing. This salvage diary can be searched by any full or partial keyword. The Diaries use an abbreviated series of acronyms, most of which are listed below. Their deciphering is work in progress. If you can provide assistance help “fill in the gaps,” please contact: AMMA Archival specialist Sharon Woods (808) 422-7048, or by mail: USS Arizona Memorial #1 Arizona Memorial Place Honolulu, HI 96818 Missing Dates: 1 Dec, 1941-28 Feb, 1942 (entire 3 months) 11 March, 1942 15 Jun
[Show full text]
Marine Modelling Revisited 26 USN Dreadnought Battleships
REVISITED Marine Modelling International magazine ran from October 1985 to August 2017 for a total of 365 issues with 240 ‘Waterlines’ articles including in the first and last issues. Beginning in 2011 many of these articles were gathered together in various ‘Waterlines – Revisited’ pdfs providing the opportunity to re-read some of those early and not so early articles virtually as they were. This final pdf combines a series of unpublished articles originally planned for late 2017/early 2018, their subject being the United States Navy’s Dreadnought Battleships. Additional pictures & information have been included. 26: USN Dreadnought Battleships Early Dreadnoughts .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Notes on the Waterlines ........................................................................................................................................... 2 South Carolina Class ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Delaware Class ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Wyoming Class ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 New York Class ......................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
1 Statement of Admiral James F. Caldwell Deputy Administrator For
Statement of Admiral James F. Caldwell Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy on the Fiscal Year 2019 President’s Budget Request Before the House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development March 20, 2018 Chairman Simpson, Ranking Member Kaptur, and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to present the President’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 budget request for Naval Reactors. In 1955, the United States experienced a step-change in naval dominance when USS NAUTILUS (SSN 571) reported “Underway on nuclear power”. Since NAUTILUS, follow-on classes of ever more capable U.S. nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft carriers have ensured our warfighting edge over potential adversaries. Forward deployed fast attack submarines exert influence throughout the world, safeguarding vital commercial sea-lanes, protecting aircraft carrier and expeditionary strike groups, and operating virtually undetected in all the world’s oceans, even under the Arctic ice. Our Navy’s ballistic missile submarines provide strategic deterrence capability to our country and have done so for six decades. Virtually undetectable when submerged, these ballistic missile submarines form the most survivable component of the nuclear triad. Our nuclear aircraft carriers provide the nation highly mobile, sustainable, sovereign territory from which to project flexible, rapid, visible, and credible U.S. military power to keep the peace, deter conflict, and protect American interests around the world. Nuclear propulsion enables these warships to conduct missions vital to national security by providing unique tactical mobility and flexibility, responsiveness, and sustainability – these key attributes ensure our nuclear fleet can meet the demands of forward presence and crisis response world- wide.
[Show full text]
Department of the Navy, Dod § 706.2
Department of the Navy, DoD § 706.2 § 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary TABLE ONE—Continued of the Navy under Executive Order Distance in 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605. meters of The Secretary of the Navy hereby forward masthead finds and certifies that each vessel list- Vessel Number light below ed in this section is a naval vessel of minimum required special construction or purpose, and height. that, with respect to the position of § 2(a)(i) Annex I the navigational lights listed in this section, it is not possible to comply USS SAMUEL B. ROBERTS ........ FFG 58 1.6 fully with the requirements of the pro- USS KAUFFMAN ........................... FFG 59 1.6 USS RODNEY M. DAVIS .............. FFG 60 1.6 visions enumerated in the Inter- USS INGRAHAM ........................... FFG 61 1.37 national Regulations for Preventing USS FREEDOM ............................ LCS 1 5.99 Collisions at Sea, 1972, without inter- USS INDEPENDENCE .................. LCS 2 4.14 USS FORT WORTH ...................... LCS 3 5.965 fering with the special function of the USS CORONADO ......................... LCS 4 4.20 vessel. The Secretary of the Navy fur- USS MILWAUKEE ......................... LCS 5 6.75 ther finds and certifies that the naviga- USS JACKSON ............................. LCS 6 4.91 USS DETROIT ............................... LCS 7 6.80 tional lights in this section are in the USS MONTGOMERY .................... LCS 8 4.91 closest possible compliance with the USS LITTLE ROCK ....................... LCS 9 6.0 applicable provisions of the Inter- USS GABRIELLE GIFFORDS ....... LCS 10 4.91 national Regulations for Preventing USS SIOUX CITY .......................... LCS 11 5.98 USS OMAHA ................................. LCS 12 4.27 Collisions at Sea, 1972.
[Show full text]
The Evolution of the US Navy Into an Effective
The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeff T. Reardon August 2008 © 2008 Jeff T. Reardon All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 by JEFF T. REARDON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Marvin E. Fletcher Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT REARDON, JEFF T., Ph.D., August 2008, History The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942-1943 (373 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Marvin E. Fletcher On the night of August 8-9, 1942, American naval forces supporting the amphibious landings at Guadalcanal and Tulagi Islands suffered a humiliating defeat in a nighttime clash against the Imperial Japanese Navy. This was, and remains today, the U.S. Navy’s worst defeat at sea. However, unlike America’s ground and air forces, which began inflicting disproportionate losses against their Japanese counterparts at the outset of the Solomon Islands campaign in August 1942, the navy was slow to achieve similar success. The reason the U.S. Navy took so long to achieve proficiency in ship-to-ship combat was due to the fact that it had not adequately prepared itself to fight at night.
[Show full text]