WMO Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WMO Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 2010 WMO statement on the status of the global climate in 2010 WMO-No. 1074 WMO-No. 1074 © World Meteorological Organization, 2011 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chair, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 03 P.O. Box 2300 Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 80 40 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-92-63-11074-9 WMO in collaboration with Members issues since 1993 annual statements on the status of the global climate. This publication was issued in collaboration with the Hadley Centre of the UK Meteorological Office, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; the Climatic Research Unit (CRU), University of East Anglia, United Kingdom; the Climate Prediction Center (CPC), the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), the National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS), the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and the National Weather Service (NWS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), United States of America; the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) operated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), United States; the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), United States; the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), United Kingdom; the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC), Germany; and the Dartmouth Flood Observatory, United States. Other contributors are the National Meteorological and Hydrological Services or equivalent climate institutions of Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Croatia, Denmark, Fiji, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, Russian Federation, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). The WMO Regional Association VI (Europe) Regional Climate Centre on Climate Monitoring, the African Centre of Meteorological Applications for Development (ACMAD, Niamey), the International Research Centre on El Niño (CIIFEN, Guayaquil, Ecuador), the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC, Nairobi), the Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) and the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) also contributed. Cover: Autumn wind. Illustration by Roisin Manning, 10 years old, United Kingdom NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Opinions expressed in WMO publications are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of WMO. The mention of specific companies or products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WMO in preference to others of a similar nature which are not mentioned or advertised. Foreword In 1993 the World Meteorological Organization Climate Services, in response to the unanimous (WMO) launched its annual “WMO Statement decision of the World Climate Conference-3, on the Status of the Global Climate” series, in which WMO convened in 2009 in partnership the wake of climate awareness generated by with the United Nations system. Through the the Second World Climate Conference, which development of the Framework, WMO is com- WMO organized with its scientific partners mitted to further improve its climate products, in 1990. The report has continued to gain in information and service delivery to serve all popularity and is today a recognized authori- climate-sensitive socioeconomic sectors. tative source of information for the scientific community, the media and the public at large. The year 2010 was WMO’s Diamond Jubilee, The present WMO Statement on the Status of since on 23 March 1950 the new Organization the Global Climate in 2010 is the latest member took over the global responsibilities of the of this successful sequence. International Meteorological Organization, established in 1873 as an outcome of the The year 2010 was especially notable in that First International Meteorological Congress global surface temperatures reached record held in Vienna. values at the same level as in 1998 and 2005, consistent with the acceleration of the warm- I wish to express the appreciation of WMO to ing experienced over the last 50 years. The all the Centres and the National Meteorological year also signalled the closure of the warmest and Hydrological Services of its 189 Members decade on record. Over this decade, warm- that collaborated with WMO and contributed ing was markedly more pronounced in some to this key publication. As with the previous regions, notably so in North Africa and the editions, I would like to underscore the impor- Arabian Peninsula, South Asia and the Arctic. tance of your feedback. WMO looks forward to your comments on the WMO Statement on Moreover, large and extended climate the Status of the Global Climate in 2010 and extremes were recorded in several parts of to your welcome suggestions for its further the world, causing significant socio-economic improvement. impacts. In particular, the flooding in Pakistan and Australia as well as the summer heatwave in the Russian Federation were among the most remarkable climate extremes of the year. Furthermore, 2010 was also special as the year in which a High-level Taskforce developed recommendations for the structure, priorities (M. Jarraud) and governance of a Global Framework for Secretary-General 1 Global temperatures in 2010 Note: The analysis is based on three independent datasets, maintained by the Hadley Centre of the Meteorological Office, UK, and the Climatic Average global temperatures were estimated Research Unit of the University of East Anglia (HadCRU) in the United to be 0.53°C ± 0.09°C above the 1961–1990 Kingdom, the National Climatic Data Center of the National Oceanic and annual average of 14°C. This makes 2010 Atmospheric Administration (NCDC–NOAA) in the United States, and tied for warmest year on record in records the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) operated by the National dating back to 1880. The 2010 nominal value Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in the United States. of +0.53°C ranks just ahead of those of 2005 (+0.52°C) and 1998 (+0.51°C), although the differences between the three years are not Major large-scale influences on the global statistically significant, due to uncertainties climate in 2010 mainly associated with sampling the Earth’s land and sea surface temperatures using The year 2010 began with an El Niño event only a finite number of observation sites, well established in the Pacific Ocean. This Figure 1. Global ranked and the way estimates are interpo- surface temperatures lated between those sites. Data from for the warmest 0.6 2010 the ECMWF Interim Reanalysis (ERA) 2005 0.4 1998 2003 50 years. Inset shows 2002 0.2 2009 2006 0.6 2007 0.0 indicate that 2010 ranks as the world’s 2004 global ranked surface 2001 –0.2 –0.4 2008 second warmest year, with the differ- 1997 temperatures from 1880. –0.6 1995 1999 1990 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 The size of the bars ence between it and 2005 within the 2000 0.4 1991 Rank 1988 margin of uncertainty. 1987 1996 1983 indicates the 95 per 1994 1981 1944 1989 cent confidence limits 1980 1993 1941 1992 1973 1977 1986 0.2 1938 1979 2010 1940 The decade 2001–2010 was also the 1943 1939 1945 associated with each 1937 1953 1963 1982 1984 1969 1942 1958 2000–2009 1962 1961 1985 year. Values are simple warmest on record. Temperatures over 1990–1999 1957 1970–1989 area-weighted averages the decade averaged 0.46°C above the from 1961–1990 average 0.0 Temperature difference (°C) 1950–1969 for the whole year. 1961–1990 mean, 0.21°C warmer than 1930–1949 1910–1929 (Source: Met Office Hadley the previous record decade 1991–2000. 1850–1909 Centre, UK, and Climatic In turn, 1991–2000 was warmer than –0.2 Research Unit, University of previous decades, consistent with a 10 20 30 40 50 East Anglia, United Kingdom) long-term warming trend. Rank of hottest years to coldest Figure 2. Annual global average temperature 0.6 anomalies (relative to Met Office Hadley Centre and Climatic Research Unit 1961–1990) from 1850 NOAA National Climatic Data Center to 2010 from the Hadley 0.4 NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Centre/CRU (HadCRUT3) (black line and grey area, representing mean and 0.2 95 per cent uncertainty range), the NOAA 0 National Climatic Data Center (red); and the NASA Goddard Institute – 0.2 for Space Studies (blue) (Source: Met Office Hadley Centre, UK, and Climatic – 0.4 Research Unit, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom) Anomaly (°C) relative to 1961–1990 to relative (°C) Anomaly – 0.6 – 0.8 1850 1900 1950 2000 Year 2 Figure 3. Decadal global broke down quickly in the early months of the 2001–2010 14.46 average combined year. A rapid transition took place and La Niña 1991–2000 14.25 conditions were in place by August. By some 1981–1990 14.12 land-ocean surface 13.95 measures the La Niña event in progress at the 1971–1980 temperature (°C), 1961–1970 13.90 combining three global end of 2010 is the strongest since at least the 1951–1960 13.89 temperature datasets mid-1970s, and among the five strongest of 1941–1950 13.92 1931–1940 13.89 (Source: Met Office Hadley the last century.
Recommended publications
  • Basic Data Construction for a Typhoon Disaster Prevention Model : Monthly Characteristics of Typhoon Rusa, Maemi, Kompasu, and Bolaven
    AAS02-P10 Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2019 Basic Data Construction for a Typhoon Disaster Prevention Model : Monthly Characteristics of Typhoon Rusa, Maemi, Kompasu, and Bolaven *HANA NA1, Woo-Sik Jung1 1. Department of Atmospheric Environment Information Engineering, Atmospheric Environment Information Research Center, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea According to a typhoon report that summarized the typhoons that had affected the Korean Peninsula for approximately 100 years since the start of weather observation in the Korean Peninsula, the number of typhoons that affected the Korean Peninsula was the highest in August, followed by July, and September. A study that analyzed the period between 1953 and 2003 revealed that the number of typhoons that affected the Korean Peninsula was 62 in August, 49 in July, and 45 in September. As shown, previous studies that analyzed the typhoons that affected the Korean Peninsula by month were primarily focused on the impact frequency. This study aims to estimate the monthly impact frequency of the typhoons that affected the Korean Peninsula as well as the maximum wind speed that accompanied the typhoons. It also aims to construct the basic data of a typhoon disaster prevention model by estimating the maximum wind speed during typhoon period using Typhoon Rusa that resulted in the highest property damage, Typhoon Maemi that recorded the maximum wind speed, Typhoon Kompasu that significantly affected the Seoul metropolitan area, and Typhoon Bolaven that recently recorded severe damages. A typhoon disaster prevention model was used to estimate the maximum wind speed of the 3-second gust that may occur, and the 700 hPa wind speed estimated through WRF(Weather Research and Forecasting) numerical simulation was used as input data.
    [Show full text]
  • NICAM Predictability of the Monsoon Gyre Over The
    EARLY ONLINE RELEASE This is a PDF of a manuscript that has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. As the article has not yet been formatted, copy edited or proofread, the final published version may be different from the early online release. This pre-publication manuscript may be downloaded, distributed and used under the provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. It may be cited using the DOI below. The DOI for this manuscript is DOI:10.2151/jmsj.2019-017 J-STAGE Advance published date: December 7th, 2018 The final manuscript after publication will replace the preliminary version at the above DOI once it is available. 1 NICAM predictability of the monsoon gyre over the 2 western North Pacific during August 2016 3 4 Takuya JINNO1 5 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, 6 The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 7 8 Tomoki MIYAKAWA 9 Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute 10 The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan 11 12 and 13 Masaki SATOH 14 Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute 15 The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan 16 17 18 19 20 Sep 30, 2018 21 22 23 24 25 ------------------------------------ 26 1) Corresponding author: Takuya Jinno, School of Science, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 27 Tokyo 113-0033 JAPAN. 28 Email: [email protected] 29 Tel(domestic): 03-5841-4298 30 Abstract 31 In August 2016, a monsoon gyre persisted over the western North Pacific and was 32 associated with the genesis of multiple devastating tropical cyclones.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Observatory, 134A Nathan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    78 BAVI AUG : ,- HAISHEN JANGMI SEP AUG 6 KUJIRA MAYSAK SEP SEP HAGUPIT AUG DOLPHIN SEP /1 CHAN-HOM OCT TD.. MEKKHALA AUG TD.. AUG AUG ATSANI Hong Kong HIGOS NOV AUG DOLPHIN() 2012 SEP : 78 HAISHEN() 2010 NURI ,- /1 BAVI() 2008 SEP JUN JANGMI CHAN-HOM() 2014 NANGKA HIGOS(2007) VONGFONG AUG ()2005 OCT OCT AUG MAY HAGUPIT() 2004 + AUG SINLAKU AUG AUG TD.. JUL MEKKHALA VAMCO ()2006 6 NOV MAYSAK() 2009 AUG * + NANGKA() 2016 AUG TD.. KUJIRA() 2013 SAUDEL SINLAKU() 2003 OCT JUL 45 SEP NOUL OCT JUL GONI() 2019 SEP NURI(2002) ;< OCT JUN MOLAVE * OCT LINFA SAUDEL(2017) OCT 45 LINFA() 2015 OCT GONI OCT ;< NOV MOLAVE(2018) ETAU OCT NOV NOUL(2011) ETAU() 2021 SEP NOV VAMCO() 2022 ATSANI() 2020 NOV OCT KROVANH(2023) DEC KROVANH DEC VONGFONG(2001) MAY 二零二零年 熱帶氣旋 TROPICAL CYCLONES IN 2020 2 二零二一年七月出版 Published July 2021 香港天文台編製 香港九龍彌敦道134A Prepared by: Hong Kong Observatory, 134A Nathan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong © 版權所有。未經香港天文台台長同意,不得翻印本刊物任何部分內容。 © Copyright reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the permission of the Director of the Hong Kong Observatory. 知識產權公告 Intellectual Property Rights Notice All contents contained in this publication, 本刊物的所有內容,包括但不限於所有 including but not limited to all data, maps, 資料、地圖、文本、圖像、圖畫、圖片、 text, graphics, drawings, diagrams, 照片、影像,以及數據或其他資料的匯編 photographs, videos and compilation of data or other materials (the “Materials”) are (下稱「資料」),均受知識產權保護。資 subject to the intellectual property rights 料的知識產權由香港特別行政區政府 which are either owned by the Government of (下稱「政府」)擁有,或經資料的知識產 the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the “Government”) or have been licensed to 權擁有人授予政府,為本刊物預期的所 the Government by the intellectual property 有目的而處理該等資料。任何人如欲使 rights’ owner(s) of the Materials to deal with 用資料用作非商業用途,均須遵守《香港 such Materials for all the purposes contemplated in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Typhoon-Induced Flood Flows at Ungauged Catchments Using Simple Regression and Generalized Estimating Equation Approaches
    water Article Prediction of Typhoon-Induced Flood Flows at Ungauged Catchments Using Simple Regression and Generalized Estimating Equation Approaches Hyosang Lee 1, Neil McIntyre 2 ID , Joungyoun Kim 3 ID , Sunggu Kim 1 and Hojin Lee 1,* 1 School of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea; [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (S.K.) 2 Centre for Water in the Minerals Industry, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; [email protected] 3 Department of Information & Statistics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-43-261-2379 Received: 29 March 2018; Accepted: 14 May 2018; Published: 16 May 2018 Abstract: Typhoons are the main type of natural disaster in Korea, and accurately predicting typhoon-induced flood flows at gauged and ungauged locations remains an important challenge. Flood flows caused by six typhoons since 2002 (typhoons Rusa, Maemi, Nari, Dienmu, Kompasu and Bolaven) are modeled at the outlets of 24 Geum River catchments using the Probability Distributed Moisture model. The Monte Carlo Analysis Toolbox is applied with the Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency as the criterion for model parameter estimation. Linear regression relationships between the parameters of the Probability Distributed Moisture model and catchment characteristics are developed for the purpose of generalizing the parameter estimates to ungauged locations. These generalized parameter estimates are tested in terms of ability to predict the flood hydrographs over the 24 catchments using a leave-one-out validation approach. We then test the hypothesis that a more complex generalization approach, the Generalized Estimating Equation, which includes properties of the typhoons as well as catchment characteristics as predictors of PDM model parameters, will provide more accurate predictions.
    [Show full text]
  • 二零一七熱帶氣旋tropical Cyclones in 2017
    => TALIM TRACKS OF TROPICAL CYCLONES IN 2017 <SEP (), ! " Daily Positions at 00 UTC(08 HKT), :; SANVU the number in the symbol represents <SEP the date of the month *+ Intermediate 6-hourly Positions ,')% Super Typhoon NORU ')% *+ Severe Typhoon JUL ]^ BANYAN LAN AUG )% Typhoon OCT '(%& Severe Tropical Storm NALGAE AUG %& Tropical Storm NANMADOL JUL #$ Tropical Depression Z SAOLA( 1722) OCT KULAP JUL HAITANG JUL NORU( 1705) JUL NESAT JUL MERBOK Hong Kong / JUN PAKHAR @Q NALGAE(1711) ,- AUG ? GUCHOL AUG KULAP( 1706) HATO ROKE MAWAR <SEP JUL AUG JUL <SEP T.D. <SEP @Q GUCHOL( 1717) <SEP T.D. ,- MUIFA TALAS \ OCT ? HATO( 1713) APR JUL HAITANG( 1710) :; KHANUN MAWAR( 1716) AUG a JUL ROKE( 1707) SANVU( 1715) XZ[ OCT HAIKUI AUG JUL NANMADOL AUG NOV (1703) DOKSURI JUL <SEP T.D. *+ <SEP BANYAN( 1712) TALAS(1704) \ SONCA( 1708) JUL KHANUN( 1720) AUG SONCA JUL MERBOK (1702) => OCT JUL JUN TALIM( 1718) / <SEP T.D. PAKHAR( 1714) OCT XZ[ AUG NESAT( 1709) T.D. DOKSURI( 1719) a JUL APR <SEP _` HAIKUI( 1724) DAMREY NOV NOV de bc KAI-( TAK 1726) MUIFA (1701) KIROGI DEC APR NOV _` DAMREY( 1723) OCT T.D. APR bc T.D. KIROGI( 1725) T.D. T.D. JAN , ]^ NOV Z , NOV JAN TEMBIN( 1727) LAN( 1721) TEMBIN SAOLA( 1722) DEC OCT DEC OCT T.D. OCT de KAI- TAK DEC 更新記錄 Update Record 更新日期: 二零二零年一月 Revision Date: January 2020 頁 3 目錄 更新 頁 189 表 4.10: 二零一七年熱帶氣旋在香港所造成的損失 更新 頁 217 附件一: 超強颱風天鴿(1713)引致香港直接經濟損失的 新增 估算 Page 4 CONTENTS Update Page 189 TABLE 4.10: DAMAGE CAUSED BY TROPICAL CYCLONES IN Update HONG KONG IN 2017 Page 219 Annex 1: Estimated Direct Economic Losses in Hong Kong Add caused by Super Typhoon Hato (1713) 二零一 七 年 熱帶氣旋 TROPICAL CYCLONES IN 2017 2 二零一九年二月出版 Published February 2019 香港天文台編製 香港九龍彌敦道134A Prepared by: Hong Kong Observatory 134A Nathan Road Kowloon, Hong Kong © 版權所有。未經香港天文台台長同意,不得翻印本刊物任何部分內容。 ©Copyright reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Annual Summaries of the Climate System in 2010
    2. Annual summaries of the climate system in (c) Summer (June – August 2010, Fig. 2.1.4c) 2010 Japan experienced its hottest summer in more than 100 years. The seasonal mean temperature in 2.1 Climate in Japan Japan, which is the average value for 17 observatory 2.1.1 Average surface temperature, precipitation stations deemed to be relatively unaffected by the amounts and sunshine durations urban heat island effect, was the highest on record The annual anomaly of the average surface since 1898. In particular, August was so hot that temperature over Japan (averaged over 17 monthly mean temperature records for August were observatories confirmed as being relatively unaffected broken at 77 out of 154 observatories in Japan. by urbanization) in 2010 was 0.86°C above normal Seasonal precipitation amounts were significantly (based on the 1971 – 2000 average), and was the above normal on the Sea of Japan side of northern fourth highest since 1898. On a longer time scale, Japan due to the influence of a series of fronts. average surface temperatures have risen at a rate of (d) Autumn (September – November 2010, Fig. about 1.15°C per century since 1898 (Fig. 2.1.1). 2.1.4d) Seasonal mean temperatures were above normal 2.1.2 Seasonal features nationwide and significantly above normal in northern (a) Winter (December 2009 – February 2010, Fig. Japan. Due to severe late summer heat in the first half 2.1.4a) of September, records for the frequency of extremely Although seasonal mean temperatures were hot days (defined as those with maximum daily above normal nationwide, the intraseasonal temperatures of 35°C or over) for September were temperature variation was large.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement Measure of Integrated Disaster Management System Considering Disaster Damage Characteristics: Focusing on the Republic of Korea
    sustainability Article Improvement Measure of Integrated Disaster Management System Considering Disaster Damage Characteristics: Focusing on the Republic of Korea Young Seok Song 1 , Moo Jong Park 2 , Jung Ho Lee 3, Byung Sik Kim 4 and Yang Ho Song 3,* 1 Department of Civil Engineering and Landscape Architectural, Daegu Technical University, Daegu 42734, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Aeronautics and Civil Engineering, Hanseo University, Seosan 31962, Korea; [email protected] 3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Korea; [email protected] 4 Department of Urban Environment & Disaster Management, School of Disaster Prevention, Kangwon National University, Kangwon 25913, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-070-8238-5646 Received: 25 October 2019; Accepted: 30 December 2019; Published: 1 January 2020 Abstract: Recently, the Republic of Korea has experienced natural disasters, such as typhoons and heavy rainfall, as well as social accidents, such as large-scale accidents and infectious diseases, which are continuously occurring. Despite repeated disasters, problems such as inefficient early response and overlapping command systems occur continuously. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of disaster management systems by foreign countries, and the status of the damages by disasters for the past 10 years in the Republic of Korea, to suggest possible measures to improve the Republic of Korea’s integrated disaster management system. When a disaster occurs in the Republic of Korea, the Si/Gun/Gu Disaster Safety Measure Headquarters, under the command of the local governments, become the responsible agencies for disaster response while the central government supervises and controls the overall disaster support and disaster management.
    [Show full text]
  • Typhoon Blows up Korean Fruit Prices
    For fresh fruit and vegetable marketing and distribution in Asia By Fruitnet.com Staff Friday 31st August 2012, 4:01 GMT Typhoon blows up Korean fruit prices Fruit prices in South Korea are likely to soar after a typhoon hit the country earlier this week, with another expected in the coming days he price of fruit in South Korea is The damage is estimated to be twice that be cheaper this autumn because the harvest T expected to rise in the wake of incurred when typhoon Kompasu hit the looked to be good this year but the supply typhoon bolaven that damaged country two years ago causing losses of suddenly dropped due to the typhoon. pipfruit crops when it swept across the W39.1bn. Fruit prices will soar,” an insider at Seoul country earlier this week. Agricultural and Marine Products Traders told the Korea Herald they Corporation told the newspaper. The Korea Herald has reported insurance expected prices to spike as a result of the payouts to affected farmers are expected typhoon, especially as demand increased to reach W80bn (US$70.5m) with insurance ahead of Chuseok – or Korean provider Nonghyup estimating damage to Thanksgiving, that takes place next month. 9,424ha of orchards. Compounding Fruit is typically used for gifting over the problems for growers, a second typhoon, three-day festival. Tembin, is expected to hit the country in the coming days. “Fruits were expected to http://www.fruitnet.com/americafruit/article/1474/parts-of-san-diego-quarantined-as-psyllid-count-mounts © Copyright Market Intelligence Ltd - Fruitnet.com 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix (PDF:4.3MB)
    APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS: APPENDIX 1. Overview of Japan’s National Land Fig. A-1 Worldwide Hypocenter Distribution (for Magnitude 6 and Higher Earthquakes) and Plate Boundaries ..................................................................................................... 1 Fig. A-2 Distribution of Volcanoes Worldwide ............................................................................ 1 Fig. A-3 Subduction Zone Earthquake Areas and Major Active Faults in Japan .......................... 2 Fig. A-4 Distribution of Active Volcanoes in Japan ...................................................................... 4 2. Disasters in Japan Fig. A-5 Major Earthquake Damage in Japan (Since the Meiji Period) ....................................... 5 Fig. A-6 Major Natural Disasters in Japan Since 1945 ................................................................. 6 Fig. A-7 Number of Fatalities and Missing Persons Due to Natural Disasters ............................. 8 Fig. A-8 Breakdown of the Number of Fatalities and Missing Persons Due to Natural Disasters ......................................................................................................................... 9 Fig. A-9 Recent Major Natural Disasters (Since the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake) ............ 10 Fig. A-10 Establishment of Extreme Disaster Management Headquarters and Major Disaster Management Headquarters ........................................................................... 21 Fig. A-11 Dispatchment of Government Investigation Teams (Since
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Conversion Relationship Between
    remote sensing Article An Improved Conversion Relationship between Tropical Cyclone Intensity Index and Maximum Wind Speed for the Advanced Dvorak Technique in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean Using SMAP Data Sumin Ryu 1, Sung-Eun Hong 2 , Jun-Dong Park 3 and Sungwook Hong 1,4,* 1 Department of Environment, Energy and Geoinfomatics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Research and Development, GI E&S Co., Ltd., Seoul 04173, Korea; [email protected] 3 National Meteorological Satellite Center, Korea Meteorological Administration, Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do 27803, Korea; [email protected] 4 Department of Research and Development, DeepThoTh Co., Ltd., Seoul 05006, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-6935-2430 Received: 13 July 2020; Accepted: 10 August 2020; Published: 11 August 2020 Abstract: The Advanced Dvorak Technique (ADT) uses geostationary satellite data to estimate tropical cyclone (TC) intensity owing to the difficulty in directly observing a TC’s internal structure. This study presents a new relationship (Hong and Ryu scale) between the current intensity (CI) number and estimated maximum wind speed (MWS) of TCs over the northwestern Pacific region; the CI number is the TC intensity index retrieved from the ADT. The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) with the L-band (1.4 GHz) microwave radiometer, is used to calibrate and produce the new Hong and Ryu scale for the ADT algorithm. Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) best track MWS data, SMAP sea surface wind speed estimates, and ADT’s TC intensity data between 2015–2018 are spatiotemporally collocated for the calibration process.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES and CORRESPONDENCE NICAM Predictability of the Monsoon Gyre Over the Western North Pacific During August 2016
    JournalApril 2019 of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 97(2),T. 533−540, JINNO et 2019. al. doi:10.2151/jmsj.2019-017 533 Special Edition on Tropical Cyclones in 2015 − 2016 NOTES and CORRESPONDENCE NICAM Predictability of the Monsoon Gyre over the Western North Pacific during August 2016 Takuya JINNO Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Tomoki MIYAKAWA Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan and Masaki SATOH Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Manuscript received 9 February 2018, in final form 17 November 2018) Abstract In August 2016, a monsoon gyre persisted over the western North Pacific and was associated with the genesis of multiple devastating tropical cyclones (TCs). A series of hindcast simulations were performed using the non- hydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model (NICAM) to reproduce the temporal evolution of this monsoon gyre. The simulations that were initiated at dates during the mature stage of the monsoon gyre successfully reproduced its termination and the subsequent intensification of the Bonin high, whereas the simulations initiated before the formation and during the developing stage of the gyre failed to reproduce subsequent gyre evolution even at a short lead time. These experiments further suggest a possibility that the development of the Bonin high is related to the termination of the monsoon gyre. The high predictability of the termination is likely due to the predictable midlatitudinal signals that intensify the Bonin high. Keywords monsoon gyre; Bonin high; monsoon circulation; tropical cyclogenesis Citation Jinno, T., T.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Observatory Tracks of Tropical
    HONG KONG OBSERVATORY TRACKS OF TROPICAL CYCLONES IN 2010 (), !"# $ ?@ KOMPASU Daily Positions at 00 UTC(08 HKT), SEP the number in the symbol represents the date of the month 34 DIANMU ,- AUG Intermediate 6-hourly Positions .)+' Super Typhoon KLM )+' Severe Typhoon MALAKAS SEP +' Typhoon CD )* '( Severe Tropical Storm MALOU SEP '( Tropical Storm NO %& Tropical Depression CHABA OCT T.D. 7#JUL EFG MERANTI SEP AB(8)100 MEGI NAMTHEUN OCT AUG HIJ 89 T.D. FANAPI CHANTHU AB 7#JUL SEP NAMTHEUN T.D. 7#JUL AUG OCT =$> CD(1009) LIONROCK 56 MALOU CONSON SEP SEP T.D. 7#JUL EFG(1010 ) DEC MERANTI 34()1004 HIJ(1011 ) SEP DIANMU FANAPI AUG :;< SEP /01 ?@(10 07) MINDULLE T.D. OMAIS OCT T.D. KOMPASU AUG 2#MAR T.D. OCT =$>(10 06) AUG KLM(1012 ) DEC LIONROCK MALAKAS T.D. AUG NO(1014) SEP OCT CHABA OCT :;<(5)100 MINDULLE AUG 89(1003) CHANTHU 56(1002) 7#JUL CONSON 7#JUL (1013) MEGI OCT /01(1001) OMAIS 2#MAR 二零一零年熱 帶 氣 旋 TROPICAL CYCLONES IN 2010 2 二零一一年七月出版 Published July 2011 香港天文台編製 香港九龍彌敦道134A Prepared by: Hong Kong Observatory 134A Nathan Road Kowloon, Hong Kong © 版權所有。未經香港天文台台長同意,不得翻印本刊物任何部分內容。 © Copyright reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the permission of the Director of the Hong Kong Observatory. 本刊物的編製和發表,目的是促進資 This publication is prepared and 料交流。香港特別行政區政府(包括 disseminated in the interest of promoting 其僱員及代理人) 對於本刊物所載資 the exchange of information. The Government of the Hong Kong Special 料的準確性、完整性或效用,概不作 Administrative Region (including its 出明確或暗示的保證、聲明或陳述; servants and agents) makes no warranty, 在法律許可的範圍內,對於提供或使 statement or representation, express or 用這些資料而可能直接或間接引致 implied, with respect to the accuracy, 任何損失、損壞或傷害(包括死亡), completeness, or usefulness of the 亦不負任何法律承擔或責任(包括疏 information contained herein, and in so far 忽責任)。 as permitted by law, shall not have any legal liability or responsibility (including liability for negligence) for any loss, damage, or injury (including death) which may result, whether directly or indirectly, from the supply or use of such information.
    [Show full text]