DOCSLIB.ORG

TRANSPORTATION and GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2018 GRANT APPLICATION APPLICATIONS DUE 4:00 PM, June 8, 2018 Note: This Form Must

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRANSPORTATION and GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2018 GRANT APPLICATION APPLICATIONS DUE 4:00 PM, June 8, 2018 Note: This Form Must TRANSPORTATION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2018 GRANT APPLICATION APPLICATIONS DUE 4:00 PM, June 8, 2018 Note: This form must be filled out using the latest version of Adobe Acrobat or Reader. Download the latest version of Reader here: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Download the Application, Application Packet, and Racial and Ethnic Impact Statement at: https://www.oregon.gov/LCD/TGM/Pages/Grants.aspx. Also on the web page are examples of successful TGM Applications, a list of all TGM grants to date, and help for developing a project approach and budget. Type of Grant: Category 1 ODOT Region (1-5): Region 1 Primary Applicant Jurisdiction: TriMet Project Title: TriMet Pedestrian Plan Mailing Address: 1800 SW 1st Ave., Suite 300 City/Zip: Portland 97201 Contact Person: Eve Nilenders Contact Person Title: Planner, Planning & Policy Telephone/Email: 503-962-2237 [email protected] MATCH YES NO Co-Applicants involved in the project: Summary Description of Project: This section must be completed. Do not refer to text within the application form. In no more than 1000 characters, describe the purpose of your project and the expected outcomes. The TriMet Pedestrian Plan will help jurisdictions identify top locations where infrastructure investments will improve pedestrian access to transit. Furthering the work started in the 2011 TriMet Pedestrian Network Analysis, the Pedestrian Plan will entail a robust public engagement process, the establishment of an advisory committee, and close coordination with stakeholders. The plan will include a pedestrian network connectivity analysis, an evaluation framework for pedestrian investments, and an updated hierarchy for investments in pedestrian access- to-transit infrastructure. The Pedestrian Plan will help jurisdictions identify ways to fulfill their transit-related planning obligations within their Transportation System Plans. 2018 TGM Grant Application Jurisdiction: TriMet Project Title: TriMet Pedestrian Plan TGM Funds Requested Local Match* Total Project Cost Eligible Grantee Expenses [Labor (salary plus benefits) and $20,454.00 $20,454.00 Direct Expenses] Consultant Personal Services $150,000.00 $150,000.00 TOTAL $150,000.00 $20,454.00 $170,454.00 *This amount should be a minimum of 12 percent of the total project budget, or: $20,454.00 Type of match to be provided: Labor and Supplies & Services during Project Certifications This application was prepared by staff of the primary applicant or staff of one of the involved jurisdictions. This application was prepared by the following compensated consultant: Consultant Name: Consultants may prepare the jurisdiction’s application. However, uncompensated consultants are not eligible to participate in the project itself. Consultants who are paid to prepare the application may be eligible to participate in the project. Contact Cindy Lesmeister at 503-986-4349 if you have questions. By checking this box, I certify that TriMet supports the proposed project, has the legal authority to pledge matching funds, and has the legal authority to apply for Transportation and Growth Management funds. I further certify that matching funds are available or will be available for the proposed project. I understand that all State of Oregon rules for contracting, auditing, underwriting (where applicable), and payment will apply to this project. Date: 6/8/2018 2018 TGM Grant Application Jurisdiction: TriMet Project Title: TriMet Pedestrian Plan Eligibility Requirements The following three eligibility requirements are reviewed on a pass/fail basis. Applications found to not meet each of these requirements will not be scored against the award criteria and will not be awarded a grant. 1. Clear Transportation Relationship A proposed project must have a clear transportation relationship and produce transportation benefits. A project must entail analysis, evaluation of alternative scenarios, development of implementation measures, and public involvement that results in a transportation plan, land use plan, or other product that addresses a transportation problem, need, opportunity, or issue of local or regional importance. 1000 character limit. This project has a clear transportation relationship, as developing TriMet’s Pedestrian Plan is by definition a multimodal undertaking - whether they walk or roll, everyone accesses transit as a pedestrian. However, an incomplete sidewalk network, lack of safe crossings and other barriers often prevent people from reaching transit safely and comfortably. TriMet’s experience with the 2011 Pedestrian Network Analysis (PNA) demonstrates how highlighting pedestrians’ transit access needs can serve as a catalyst for infrastructure improvements. Using data and analytical methods not available at the time of the PNA, the TriMet Pedestrian Plan will be developed through robust engagement with jurisdictions and the public. The final plan will yield an updated hierarchy of pedestrian investments developed with a consistent regional lens. 2. Adoption of Products to meet Project Objectives A proposed project must include preparation of an adoption-ready product or products that lead to a local policy decision and that directly address the project objectives, such as a transportation system plan, comprehensive plan amendment, land use plan, code amendment, implementation program, or intergovernmental agreement. Projects are expected to include adoption hearings or will be part of a larger project to be adopted. 800 character limit. The TriMet Pedestrian Plan will be adopted by the TriMet Board of Directors. The Plan will be developed in close coordination with regional partners to improve access to transit by walking and rolling. By providing jurisdictions with a prioritization framework for pedestrian infrastructure investments, the Pedestrian Plan will help jurisdictions comply with 3.08.120 and 3.08.130 of the Regional Transportation Functional Plan, which obligate them to include a transit plan and pedestrian plan in their Transportation System Plans. 3. Support of Local Officials A proposed project must clearly demonstrate that local officials, both the primary applicant and any co-applicants, understand the purpose of the grant application and support the project objectives. A letter or resolution of support from the governing body of the applying jurisdiction (e.g. City Council, Board of Commissioners, or Transit Board) must be submitted with the application to meet this requirement. 400 character limit. Attached is a letter of support from TriMet General Manager Doug Kelsey, who is authorized to execute agreements and can commit to meeting match obligations. This project is accompanied by letters of support demonstrating region-wide interest. The TriMet Board is prepared to adopt the Pedestrian Plan upon completion, similar to the Bike Plan adopted by the TriMet Board of Directors (2016). 2018 TGM Grant Application Jurisdiction: TriMet Project Title: TriMet Pedestrian Plan Award Criteria Applications are scored on a range of criteria and receive up to 100 points. Projects are selected primarily based on the points scored; also considered are the grant amounts requested, the estimated amounts TGM believes may be required to complete a project, the amount of grant dollars available for award within a geographic region, and the balance of grant dollars between Category 1 and Category 2 projects. A scoring consideration is ensuring a fair distribution of grant funds to smaller or economically distressed communities. 1. Proposed project addresses a need and supports TGM objectives (up to 40 points) The project clearly and effectively addresses a local or regional transportation or transportation-related land use issue, problem, need, or opportunity and will achieve one or more of the TGM objectives. Improving the infrastructure for walking and rolling to access transit stations and stops is key to sustainable and responsible regional growth and access. TriMet is working to reduce barriers to riding transit. Thanks to the passage of House Bill 2017, which has meant additional funding for transit statewide, TriMet has committed to introducing a low-income fare beginning this summer. Starting in Fall 2018, TriMet will also roll out the agency’s largest ever expansion of bus service as part of its Fiscal Year 2019 budget. All of these measures have meant that transit is becoming increasingly available and affordable. Despite these positive developments in reducing financial barriers to transit ridership, numerous physical barriers to transit access remain. Land use patterns, incomplete or deficient sidewalk networks, and dangerous crossings all prevent individuals who, based on distance alone, should be able to reach transit by walking or rolling from actually doing so. Displacement of lower-income residents from some of the region’s most walkable neighborhoods because of rising housing costs means that low-income riders may find themselves with less transit access and higher transportation costs. TriMet’s ability to address access deficiencies depends on close coordination with the state, regional and local jurisdictions that own and maintain the region’s roadways and walkways. The Pedestrian Plan will include metrics for identifying locations in the service district where pedestrian improvements would have the largest impact on access to transit. The plan will enable jurisdictions to develop comparisons of scenarios for investments. In assisting jurisdictions with prioritization of pedestrian investments, TriMet’s Pedestrian Plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • PBOT's Strategic Plan
    1 MOVING TO OUR FUTURE 2019-2022 2019-2022 PBOT’s Strategic Plan Moving to Our Future Index Letter from the Commissioner and Director ................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 3 How we will use this plan ................................................................... 7 What PBOT stands for ........................................................................ 9 Transportation justice ...................................................................... 12 One bureau, one mission ................................................................ 18 Goal 1: Safety ..................................................................................... 21 Goal 2: Moving People and Goods.................................................. 27 Goal 3: Asset Management .............................................................. 33 Appendix ............................................................................................ 44 Saving Lives, Saving Time, Saving Money Dear Portlanders, When we ask you what your top issues are related to getting around Portland, three answers lead the pack: safety, congestion, and road maintenance. In a recent survey, nine out of 10 Portlanders cited these three issues as their top priorities. Given these concerns, we think you will be pleased with Moving to Our Future, the strategic plan that will guide our work at the Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) for the next three years. It’s built around
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 8 Moving Forward Together
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 8 Moving Forward Together June 29, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and background ................................................................................................................ 1 8.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Connecting Our Shared Values and Vision for the Future: Setting a Course for Transportation 3 8.2 Planning and programs ......................................................................................................... 6 8.2.1 Local Implementation .................................................................................................... 6 8.2.2 Metro’s Regional Programs ............................................................................................ 7 8.2.2.1 Civil Rights and Environmental Justice program .................................................... 7 8.2.2.2 Regional Transportation Safety Program ............................................................... 8 8.2.2.3 Regional Active Transportation Program ............................................................... 9 8.2.2.4 Regional Freight Program ....................................................................................... 9 8.2.2.5 Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) Program ............... 9 8.2.2.6 Regional Travel Options (RTO) and Safe Routes to School Programs .................. 10 8.2.2.7 Air Quality and Climate
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Sauvie Island Quadrangle, Multnomah and Columbia Counties, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington
    Geologic Map of the Sauvie Island Quadrangle, Multnomah and Columbia Counties, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington By Russell C. Evarts, Jim E. O'Connor, and Charles M. Cannon Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3349 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Evarts, R.C., O'Connor, J.E., and Cannon, C.M., 2016, Geologic map of the Sauvie Island quadrangle, Multnomah and Columbia Counties, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3349, scale 1:24,000, pamphlet 34 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3349. ISSN 2329-132X (online) Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon's Recent Past
    Oregon’s Recent Past: North Willamette Valley, Portland, Columbia River, Mt. Hood. Written by RW. Faulkner Recent Photos by RW. Faulkner & MS. Faulkner ©= RW Faulkner 5/17/2018 All Rights Reserved First Printing August 2018 ISBN: 978-0-9983622-6-7 About the Cover Above Left Front Cover Above Right Back Cover Top Photo: Mt. Hood by FH Shogren, perhaps taken Top Photo: Clive E. Long, a Portland printer, near NW Thurman Street, Portland OR. Photo was & perhaps Clayton Van Riper of Dayton Ohio, featured in the 1905 Lewis & Clark Souvenir rest while climbing Mt. Hood, August 16, 1907. Program, (LC), titled, “Snow-Capped Mt. Hood, Seen Map: Copy of map of the northern Willamette Across The Exposition City,” & described by Rinaldo Valley. Original traced/drawn on tissue paper. M. Hall as, “Not every day may Mt. Hood be seen at It was used by pioneer Dr. Marcus Hudson its best, for clouds ever hover ‘round it, but the White to navigate, soon after his arrival in1891. constant watcher is frequently rewarded by seeing it (Found in a small notebook with most entries stand forth clearly & glisten in the sunlight as a dating 1892-1895, but map could be from mountain of silver. ...50 miles east of Portland by air 1891-1897.) line & 93 by shortest route, this favorite proudly rears its head 11,225 feet heavenward, thousands of feet above every neighboring object. It is one of the most notable peaks in the West, serving as a guide post to Lewis & Clark on their memorable trip of exploration to the coast in 1805-06, & later to the pioneers who hastened on to Western Oregon....” Lower Photo Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line Update Stage 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Line Is Important to the Future of Calgary and Benefits All Calgarians
    Page 1 of 19 Item # 7.1 Green Line Report to ISC: UNRESTRICTED Green Line Committee GC2020-0583 2020 June 01 Green Line Update Stage 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Line is important to the future of Calgary and benefits all Calgarians. It represents a significant investment in our transportation network, in our communities, and the future of our city. In its entirety, Green Line will deliver high-quality transit service to Calgarians in north central and southeast communities, and strategically connect communities, employment hubs, and key destinations for Calgarians who live and work across the city. Green Line will not only provide more mobility choice for Calgarians and enhance future community building, moving forward with Green Line today will ready Calgary for tomorrow’s recovery. Green Line Stage 1 will be an important part of Calgary’s economic recovery. The Stage 1 investment will create an estimated 20,000 jobs and comes at a critical time when it is important to bolster Calgary’s economy. Green Line is also a long-term investment in the growth and development of our city, it will be part of Calgary’s global competitive advantage and will help attract new businesses and a young, talented workforce to our city. In July 2019, Administration advised Council of the need to re-evaluate the scope of Stage 1 to bring the Program’s cost estimates within budget, manage construction risk and improve the customer experience to best achieve the Green Line vision. Council directed Administration to undertake a review of the Stage 1 alignment and to complete a series of due diligence activities to confirm that Stage 1 has the right alignment, that Stage 1 is the right project for Calgary and that it will be delivered using the right approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Inventory
    Oregon Lewis & Clark Historic Trail Inventory Control List of Assets Coun- Munici Non- Certi- OR Map Sign Reporter OREGON SITE Site Sign Art Center Trail Other CCS Federal Tribal State ty pal Profit Private Other fied 001 CR07 C12 EBK Fort Stevens State Park, west of Astoria x xB x longhouse 04-28, 03-219 P&R 002 CR08 C13 AFG Fort Clatsop 12/7/1805 xB x replica NPS 003 AFG Trail from Ft. Clatsop to the Pacific x x 05-?? NPS P&R 004 CR09 AFG Columbia River Maritime Museum x x CRMM 005 C11 EBK Carruthers Park x x 006 C08 AFG Astoria Riverwalk x x x 007 CR10 C09 EBK Astoria Column x x x xFOAC 008 EBK Crest Motel x x 009 L01 EBK Tapiola Park x x 010 MTJ Tongue Point--Neck 11/27/2005 DOL 011 MTJ Tongue Point 3/23/1806 USCG 012 C14 MTJ Seltzer Park x x 013 CR11 C10 EBK Youngs River Falls 3/1806 xx x 014 GEK Cullaby Lake County Park, Seaside x x Clats 015 CR12 L03 GEK Salt Works, Seaside 1/2/1806 x replica NPS 016 GEK End of the Trail Monument, Seaside x x 017 CR13 GEK Tillamook Head (Clark's Point of View) x x P&R 018 L02 EBK Seaside Roadside x DTP 019 GEK Sacagawea Statue (of wire) N. of Les Shirley Park x x 020 GEK Ecola Beaver Board on Highway 101 B TIC 021 CR14 GEK Ecola State Park, Cannon Beach 1/8/1806 xx01-71, 03-219 P&R 022 CR14 C15 GEK Les Shirley Park, Cannon Beach 1/8/1806 x 03-219 xx 025 CR15 EBK Lewis & Clark NWR x NWR F&W 027 CR16 C07 EBK Twilight Creek Eagle Sanctuary / Settler's Point 11/26/1805 xWRF&W Clats 031 EBK Clatskanie Roadside Sculpture x x 032 EBK Bradley State Park 3/24/1806 P&R 033 MWV Clatskanie (mouth of river) 3/25/1806 x x 034 EBK Rainier (Walker Island) / Lewis & Clark Bridge 3/26/1806 ODOT 035 RJB Historical Society of Columbia County x 02-99 HSCC 036 CR19 C06 RJB Prescott Beach County Park 11/5/1805 xplatform Colum 037 RJB Goble [L&C Campsite] 3/27/1806 x 038 RJB Court House Plaza, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 1 the Columbia River, a River of Power
    Lesson 1 The Columbia River, a River of Power Overview RIVER OF POWER BIG IDEA: The Columbia River System was initially changed and engineered for human benefit Disciplinary Core Ideas in the 20th Century, but now balance is being sought between human needs and restoration of habitat. Science 4-ESS3-1 – Obtain and combine Lesson 1 introduces students to the River of Power information to describe that energy curriculum unit and the main ideas that they will investigate and fuels are derived from natural resources and their uses affect the during the eleven lessons that make up the unit. This lesson environment. (Clarification Statement: focuses students on the topics of the Columbia River, dams, Examples of renewable energy and stakeholders. Through an initial brain storming session resources could include wind energy, students record and share their current understanding of the water behind dams, and sunlight; main ideas of the unit. This serves as a pre-unit assessment nonrenewable energy resources are fossil fuels and fissile materials. of their understanding and an opportunity to identify student Examples of environmental effects misconceptions. Students are also introduced to the main could include loss of habitat to dams, ideas of the unit by viewing the DVD selection Rivers to loss of habitat from surface mining, Power. Their understanding of the Columbia River and the and air pollution from burning of fossil fuels.) stakeholders who depend on the river is deepened through the initial reading selection in the student book Voyage to the Social Studies Pacific. Economics 2.4.1 Understands how geography, natural resources, Students set up their science notebook, which they will climate, and available labor use to record ideas and observations throughout the unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    McCaleb, Iris From: Birdshill CPO/NA <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 2:15 PM To: McCaleb, Iris; Simpson, Anne-Marie; Council Distribution Cc: Rooney, Erica; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; OTC Admin; [email protected]; Runnion, Kelly; Birdshill CPO/NA; Lazenby, Scott; Randy Arthur; Bill Ward; [email protected]; LaMotte, John; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wilson, Katie; Schmidt, Gary; [email protected]; CPO Summit; Siegel, Scot; [email protected]; millerthomas00 @comcast.net; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Donald Nash; Tom O'Connor (Uplands NA); Babs Hamachek (Lakewood NA); Carole Ockert; Jones, Carolyne; Cheryl Uchida; Chris Jacobson (Lake Forest NA); [email protected]; Craig Stephens; David Beckett; Dave Sengenberger; david roche; Diana Boom (Evergreen NA); Dwight Sangrey (Mt. Park); Ewa Campbell (Palisades NA); Fergus Nolan (Holly Orchard NA); Jan Castle; Jerry Nierengarten (Lake Grove NA); Jon Bell; [email protected]; [email protected]; Gary Stein; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • Each with Its Own Distinctive Personality and Style, PORTLAND's
    THE GET READY FOR YOUR 34 DOWNTOWN way to NEXT 35 OLD TOWN CHINATOWN 36 NORTHWEST PORTLAND 37 PEARL DISTRICT 38 CENTRAL EASTSIDE 39 HAWTHORNE/BELMONT . 40 DIVISION/CLINTON “10 Best in U.S.” 41 ALBERTA ARTS DISTRICT –Fodor’s Travel STREET42 MISSISSIPPI/WILLIAMS -TripAdvisor Each with its own SCENE distinctive personality and style, PORTLAND’S NEIGHBORHOODS add character to the city. ney St Pearl District NW Irving St NW Irving St ve ve A A A th oyt St th NW Hoyt St 6 6 ve ve A A Couch Park A W 1 W N St th NW Glisan St th NW Glisan 5 W 1 W N NW Flanders St ders St TRAVELPORTLAND.COM verett St NW Everett St COME VISIT US! ve e A l NW Davis St v P A Newberg, Oregon th 4 h KEEN Garage Portland t nity 0 i r 2 W 1 NW Couch St T 503.625.7385 N 505 NW 13th AVE NW NW vistaballoon.com NW W Burnside St Portland OR, 97209 405 SW ve PHOTOGRAPH BY AMYPHOTOGRAPH OUELLETTEBY ANKENY ALLEY IN OLD TOWN CHINATOWN A 33 JELD- h 3t 1 e Smith Lake Lake Force North Portland Harbor Smith Lake Columbia Slough Lake Force Columbia River Smith and Bybee Lakes Park North Portland Harbor N Swift Hwy Columbia Slough Delta Park Slough Columbia Slough Portland Intl Airport Columbia Slough Drainage Canal Drainage Canal Columbia Slough Columbia Slough Columbia Slough an Island Basin Sw Columbia Slough Columbia Slo ugh Columbia Columbia Slough Slough Beach Elem. School EAT PLAY The 1 Alder Street food cart pod (S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020
    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]