DOCSLIB.ORG

Action Sandy Hill Comments on the CEDCSP, Jan. 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Action Sandy Hill Comments on the CEDCSP, Jan. 4 January 2021 Notes on Sandy Hill in the new Central and East Downtown Core Secondary Plan (CEDCSP) • In the draft new Official Plan, Sandy Hill is part of the newly designated Downtown Core Transect. Sandy Hill's Secondary Plan (originally conceived in 1979) has been folded into a new Central and East Downtown Core Secondary Plan. • In general, the role of secondary plans is to provide the strategic planning direction to guide future development and redevelopment. While the Official Plan contains policy direction, SPs begin to use more specific geographic and neighbourhood references to guide future development and redevelopment. A further level of direction is found in Community Design Plans (such as the one for Upper Rideau). • The new CEDCSP has amalgamated Sandy Hill, Centretown, and seven additional downtown areas into one document. The Centretown and Escarpment chapters in the Plan are markedly more developed as they have been through a community design process in recent years. • Action Sandy Hill’s (ASH) position is that the Sandy Hill section of the new CEDCSP, in particular compared to its compatriots with community design plans, fails to: o Acknowledge and describe the existing conditions, pressures, and challenges of the plan area (for example, that Sandy Hill is a near-campus neighbourhood to uOttawa, that it has suffered degradation of its built environment); o Articulate the cultural and heritage character and values of the plan area (for example, the entire plan area needs to be assessed for its heritage character–not just the area north of Osgoode–with properties identified as contributing or non- contributing; o Articulate a community vision for SH, one that: § promotes walkable, human-scale development, amenities, and infrastructure, § preserves SH's heritage fabric and character, § manages growth in ways that accommodate diversity and ensure environmental sustainability, § elevates performance standards both in terms of aesthetic and functionality/liveable design, § encourages the conservation/restoration of contributing properties, and § promotes the redevelopment of non-contributing or non-sustainable 1 January 2021 properties; and, o Recognize that diversity (housing mix) is critical to the preservation/regeneration of Sandy Hill and thus fails to articulate design standards that provide for a mix of housing typologies. • Other more specific comments and questions can be found in the table below. • Action Sandy Hill requests 1) a City-organized community visioning exercise be held, to enable its residents to articulate their vision for this neighbourhood’s future (re-)development, and 2) a character area study that will articulate the cultural and heritage character and values of the plan area. These two actions will contribute to filling the gaps about Sandy Hill in the existing CEDCSP. 2 January 2021 Comparison and comment table, as a basis for discussion at a January 19, 2021 community meeting to be held with City Planning staff on the draft new Official Plan Sandy Hill in the new Central and East Former SH Secondary Plan ASH comments Downtown Core Secondary Plan Location: Character Area: Strathcona Heights and Robinson Village Sandy Hill is the area bounded by Besserer 4.7.1 - generally bounded by Besserer have been assigned to the Lees Station St to the north, the Rideau River to the east, Street to the north, the Rideau River to the character area in the new Central and East 417 and Henderson Street off-ramp to the east, Mann Avenue to the south, and King Downtown Core Secondary Plan. south, Nicholas St, the Rideau Canal and a Edward Avenue to the west. It also line joining the two to the west; and Laurier encompasses Sandy Hill West between Ave and King Edward Ave to the northwest. Waller Street, Stewart Street, Cumberland Street, Laurier Avenue, King Edward Avenue, and Besserer Street. It excludes any lots adjacent to Waller Street and Besserer Street which are in the Downtown Rideau Area. 5.3.1 General: 4.7.1.2 General Objectives: No change in the wording of this section a) To preserve and enhance Sandy Hill • To preserve and enhance Sandy Hill other than the removal of the reference to as an attractive residential as an attractive residential Amendment 19. This amendment was neighbourhood, especially for family neighbourhood, especially for family added to the Sandy Hill Secondary Plan in living. living. 2005. b) To provide for a broad range of • To provide for a broad range of socio-economic groups. socio-economic groups. c) To accept a modest increase in • To accept a modest increase in What does modest increase in population population, primarily as a way of population, primarily as a way of mean? This increase should be specified housing some of the growth in the housing some of the growth in the either as a percentage or an exact number. Central Area labour force. Central Area labour force. d) To maintain and co-ordinate both the • To maintain and co-ordinate both the local functions of Sandy Hill local functions of Sandy Hill (primarily as a residential (primarily as a residential neighbourhood) and the functions neighbourhood) and the functions that serve a wider area (e.g., the that serve a wider area (e.g., the mainstreet mixed uses area along mainstreet mixed uses area along Rideau Street and the University of Rideau Street and the University of 3 January 2021 Sandy Hill in the new Central and East Former SH Secondary Plan ASH comments Downtown Core Secondary Plan Ottawa). [Amendment 19, January Ottawa). 12, 2005] 5.3.2 Land Use: 4.7.3 Land Use and Built Form: Minor changes in wording – primarily to 1 a. Residential Land Use 4.7.3.1 Local Neighbourhood reflect the language in the draft OP. i. To preserve and enhance the 98) Preserve and enhance a stock of good existing stock of good housing. housing. ii. To distinguish among types of new 99) Distinguish among types of new housing on the basis of scale, and to housing on the basis of scale, and to locate locate the different types in areas the different types in areas appropriate to appropriate to them. them. iii. To provide a wide variety of housing, There is no mention of housing for students including accommodation for low- 100) Provide a wide variety of housing, in 100). Yet almost all of the redevelopment income people, the elderly, the including accommodation for low-income in Sandy Hill over the past 10 years has handicapped and others with special people, the elderly, the handicapped and been for students. This omission detracts needs. others with special needs. from the credibility of the document as a iv. To permit public uses that secondary plan for Sandy Hill. complement the residential ones in 101) Permit uses that complement the type and intensity. residential ones in type and intensity. v. For the lands known municipally as v. The reference to 85 Range has been 85 Range Road, designated as High removed in the new SH Secondary Plan as Profile on Schedule J, the maximum the 10-storey building has been building height is 10 storeys and the constructed. tenth storey may only be used for amenity space and mechanical equipment. [Amendment 87, July 14, 2010] vi. A mix of institutional, commercial, and residential uses that serve both 102) A mix of institutional, commercial, and Why is the reference to 261, 265, 271, 275, the University and the adjacent residential uses that serve both the 281 Laurier Ave and 400 Friel continued in residential community will be University and the adjacent residential no. 102? This residence has already been permitted at 261, 265, 271, 275, and community will be permitted at 261, 265, built. 281 Laurier Avenue East and 400 271, 275, and 281 Laurier Avenue East and Friel Street. [Amendment #134, 400 Friel Street. OMB File #PL140348, November 12, 2015] vii. For the lands known municipally as Section vii of the old plan is not included in 213, 217, 221 and 223 Henderson the new plan, The new residence on the 4 January 2021 Sandy Hill in the new Central and East Former SH Secondary Plan ASH comments Downtown Core Secondary Plan Avenue and 65 Templeton Street, corner of Henderson and Templeton (65 small-scale commercial uses are Templeton) has been built. permitted. [Amendment #205, March 30, 2018] viii. The lands municipally known as 315 315 Chapel is part of the allSaints property. Chapel Street shall be recognized 103) The lands municipally known as 315 as a Design Priority Area, and a mix Chapel Street shall be recognized as a of community and commercial uses Design Priority Area, and a mix of that serve the Sandy Hill community community and commercial uses that serve will be permitted on the site. the Sandy Hill community will be permitted [Amendment #207, April 26, 2018] on the site. b. Commercial Land Use 4.7.3.2 Commercial Uses i. To provide for small-scale shopping 104) Provide for small-scale shopping areas areas that serve the immediate that serve the immediate residential sector residential sector and to have them and to have them distributed generally distributed generally throughout throughout Sandy Hill. Sandy Hill. ii. To locate shops serving a wider 105) Locate commercial uses serving a market in areas where they will be wider market in areas where they will be readily accessible and will least readily accessible and will least affect the affect the residential environment. residential environment. 106) Laurier Avenue East is designated as Sections 106 – 108 are new. Laurier Ave. a Minor Corridor in the Official plan. A mix of was supposed to be residential. However, it institutional, small-scale commercial and is evolving into a mixed-use corridor. residential uses that serve both the Prime Minister's Row includes a number of University and the adjacent residential streets in Sandy Hill.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Manager, Transportation Services, Vivi Chi, Director, Services Department Transportation Planning
    M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C E Information previously distributed / Information distribué auparavant TO: Transportation Committee DESTINATAIRE : Comité des transports FROM: John Manconi, Contact: Phil Landry, Director, Traffic General Manager, Transportation Services, Vivi Chi, Director, Services Department Transportation Planning EXPÉDITEUR : John Manconi, Personne ressource : Philippe Landry, Directeur général, Direction générale Gestionnaire, Services de la circulation, des transports Vivi Chi, Planification des transports, DATE: February 27, 2018 27 février 2018 FILE NUMBER: ACS2018-TSD-GEN-0001 SUBJECT: Report on the use of Delegated Authority during 2017 by the Transportation Services Department as set out in Schedule “G” Transportation Services of By-law 2016-369 OBJET : Rapport sur l’utilisation de Délégation de pouvoirs en 2017 par la direction générale des Services des Transports, comme il est indiqué à l’annexe G Services des Transports, du régulant 2016-369 PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to report to the Transportation Committee on the use of delegated authority for 2017 under Schedule ‘G’ – Transportation Services of By- Law 2016-369. 1 BACKGOUND By-law 2016-369 is “a by-law of the City of Ottawa respecting the delegation of authority to various officers of the City”. The By-law was enacted by Council on November 9, 2016 and is meant to repeal By-law No. 2014-435. This By-Law provides delegated authority to officers within the Transportation Services Department to perform various operational activities, and requires that use of delegated authority be reported to the appropriate standing committee at least once per year.
    [Show full text]
  • By Email January 15, 2021 Mayor
    By Email January 15, 2021 Mayor Jim Watson 110 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1 Dear Mayor Watson: Poorly Conceived Ward Boundary Change (uOttawa - Lees Campus) Affecting Capital Ward The Old Ottawa East Community Association respectfully requests that a change made during the course of the Ward Boundary Review be reversed before the by-law is proclaimed January 27, 2021. The change does not meet the City’s criteria required for a ward boundary change. Specifically, on December 9, 2020 City Council approved ward boundary changes that included the transfer of the University of Ottawa’s Lees Avenue campus from Capital Ward to Rideau-Vanier. This transfer was introduced by an unknown party near the end of the lengthy ward boundary consultation process but the Old Ottawa East Community Association and the Old Ottawa East community were not made aware of the change until after FEDCO had blessed it. Specifically, the “Recommendations Report” for Council recommended: “Move the Gee-Gees sports field from W6-19 (Capital) to W6-17 (Rideau-Vanier). The reasons given refer to a better boundary (the River rather than Highway 417) and the area’s association with sports facilities directly to the north in Rideau-Vanier. In the recommended ward boundary configuration, the Gee-Gees sports field is moved from W6-19 to W6-17. There are no residents in this area.” (p23) The report later says: “At Robinson Park and Gee Gees Field, #417 is not a big boundary; use the River instead.” (p34) …/2 - 2 - The fundamental criterion for making ward boundary changes is to “achieve voter parity." The transfer of the Lees campus will be detrimental to voter parity because Rideau-Vanier is forecast to grow faster than Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Commissions: Threads of an Ottawa Planning History
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 11:42 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine A History of Commissions Threads of An Ottawa Planning History Ken Hillis Volume 21, Number 1, October 1992 Article abstract Early planning in Ottawa takes the form of a piece-meal architectural URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019246ar admixture. On paper there remains a series of largely unrealized proposals DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar designed to promote an image symbolic of national identity. Successive federal and municipal agencies worked to various degrees of success to augment See table of contents Ottawa's appearance and amenity. British planner Thomas Adams' departure from, and the subsequent demise of the Federal Commission of Conservation in the early 1920's marked a low point in efforts to evolve comprehensive Publisher(s) planning strategies. The career of Noulan Cauchon, first head of the Ottawa Town Planning Commission, aimed to keep the notion of planning alive in the Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine city. Certain of his little-acknowledged proposals bear remarkable similarity to the pre-W.W. II planning efforts of MacKenzie King and Jacques Greber. ISSN Cauchon's legacy endures in proposals which appear to have been incorporated into federal planning activities during the post-war era. 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Hillis, K. (1992). A History of Commissions: Threads of An Ottawa Planning History. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 21(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1992 This document is protected by copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Centretown Place
    400 Slater Street | 613-233-1188 Centretown Place www.ParamountApts.com | [613] 232-RENT [7368] Apartment Features: • Fresh, clean, and • Security card access • Underground tenant spacious suites; to building; parking and free • Newly renovated • All units wired for visitors’ parking; balconies with high speed internet and • Refreshing indoor magnificent views digital cable; pool with sauna and of the city; • Air conditioners in whirlpool; • Lobby watch each apartment; • Rooftop sundeck security system; • Electric heating available to tenants; • Located in the heart with individual unit • Billiard and recreation of downtown Ottawa; thermostats; room on site; • Caring and fast • Carpeting throughout; • SmartCard laundry response to • Appliances kept facilities; tenant needs with in excellent • Indoor storage 24-hour on-site working order; available. emergency service; • Access to party room; In the Neighbourhood: • Within walking distance of • A 10-minute walk to the • Surrounded by shops, grocery Parliament Hill, Sparks Street University of Ottawa; stores, and an endless Mall, Rideau Centre (over 200 • Located on the OC Transpo selection of restaurants; stores), and the famed Transitway, providing you full • At the centre of the downtown Byward Market; access to all major bus routes; Ottawa business district. www.ParamountApts.com | [613] 232-RENT [7368] Enjoy a game of billiards in the recreation room Centretown Place is Ottawa’s smart of Canada, and the Rideau Canal. choice for downtown living. The Byward Market is a short distance It’s easy to keep your fingertips on away, and you’re just blocks from the pulse of the city’s most vibrant Ottawa’s famous Sparks Street Mall, restaurants, entertainment, and known for it’s fine dining and downtown culture when you live world-class nightlife.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Robinson Avenue
    2 Robinson Avenue Planning Rationale + Design Brief Official Plan Amendment + Zoning By-law Amendment December 22, 2020 Prepared for Place Dorée Real Estate Holdings Inc. Prepared by Fotenn Planning + Design 396 Cooper St, Suite 300 Ottawa, ON K2P 2H7 December 2020 © Fotenn Planning + Design The information contained in this document produced by Fotenn is solely for the use of the Client identified above for the purpose for which it has been prepared and Fotenn undertakes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. \ 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Required Applications 1 1.2 Public Consultation Strategy 1 2.0 Site Context and Surrounding Area 3 2.1 Subject Site 3 2.2 Surrounding Context 3 2.3 Road Network 4 2.4 Transportation Network 4 2.5 Neighbourhood Amenities 6 3.0 Proposed Development and Design Brief 8 3.1 Project Overview 8 3.2 Massing and Scale 9 3.3 Public Realm 11 4.0 Policy and Regulatory Review 14 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement (2020) 14 4.2 City of Ottawa Official Plan (2003, as consolidated) 15 4.2.1 Managing Growth 15 4.2.2 Land Use Designation 16 4.2.3 Designing Ottawa 16 4.2.4 Urban Design and Compatibility 17 4.3 Sandy Hill Secondary Plan 21 4.4 Lees Transit Oriented Development Plan 22 4.5 Transit-Oriented Development Guidelines 25 4.6 Urban Design Guidelines for High-rise Buildings 27 4.7 University of Ottawa Campus Master Plan 28 4.8 Zoning By-law 2008-250 31 5.0 Proposed Amendments 35 5.1 Official Plan Amendment 35 5.2 Zoning By-law Amendment 35 6.0 Conclusions 37 1 Introduction Fotenn Planning + Design has been retained by Place Dorée Real Estate Holdings Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Artwork Property of WHERE™ Magazine © Concept Original De WHEREMC Magazine Lac Mahon Lac Lac- Lake Grand Des-Loups Lake Lake 105 307 Mayo R
    F-12 5 Lac Leamy ST. RAYMOND Edmonton 50 ER GAMELIN EB Boul. du Casino GR Vers / To Montréal Rivière des Outaouais Île Kettle Island MONTCLAIR Boul. de la Carrière B Ottawa River is so n R IE N R U Vers / To O Parc de la F Gatineau P RO QUÉBEC Park M. D Laramée E R SAINT-RAYMOND Chauveau Émile-Bond OC KC LIF ONTARIO FE The Rockeries SA Parc de Les rocailles Université CRÉ Rockcliffe -CŒ du Québec UR Park en Outauais RCMP, Canadian PR OM Police College . D Boucherville K E GRC, Collège R ALEXANDRE-TACHÉ O canadien de police C Canada Aviation AYLMER ALLUMETTIÈRES K P C o Lac and Space Museum n L L t RCMP I M McKay F Musée de l’aviation et Aéroport de a Musical F c E de l’espace du Canada MAISONNEUVE d Lake Rockcliffe Ride Centre o P Parc n Airport SAINT-JOSEPH a Centre du K ld W Park -C Carrousel a Île Green M Y r . Jacques-Cartier t ackay O ie de la GRC r Island Monument B Brid CAPITAL SIGHTS r into ges P id M LUCERNE à la paix a g s ATTRACTIONS DE LA CAPITALE P pi e t Crichton R o n ? n i et au souvenir e o d N n au ea O t P u ByWard Market HE I Rivière des Outaouais . ML T C O Gatineau DR Stanley CK IA h Marché By V Parc X Parc New A a E L’ mp Brébeuf S Edinburgh E MONTCALM S Canadian Museum of History D U Park P .
    [Show full text]
  • Food Link 2013/2014
    FOOD LINK 2013/2014 A Directory of Community Programs and Services Promoting Access to Food in Ottawa Just Food ottawa.ca/health | ottawa.ca/sante 613-580-6744 | TTY/ATS : 613-580-9656 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 3 COMMUNITY FOOD PROGRAMS................................................................................... 4 Ottawa Good Food Box.................................................................................... 4 Collaborative Food Pantry................................................................................ 6 Good Food Markets.......................................................................................... 6 Meals on Wheels............................................................................................. 7 Community Gardening Network of Ottawa......................................................9 Collective and Community Kitchens.............................................................. 14 Buns in the Oven Program............................................................................ 15 SCHOOL-BASED FOOD PROGRAMS.......................................................................... 17 Elementary Services.......................................................................................17 Colleges and Universities Nutrition Services..................................................18 FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 10.0 Environmental Effects, Significance and Mitigation
    10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, SIGNIFICANCE AND MITIGATION To a large degree, environmental effects were avoided or minimized to the extent possible due to the nature of the project (i.e., conversion from BRT to LRT); and during the evaluation of the alternatives and the selection of the preferred alternative. Moreover, many mitigation measures have been directly incorporated into the recommended plan. This section describes the environmental benefits and potential environmental effects of the proposed project and mitigation measures for the effects that cannot be avoided. Sections Include: 10.1 Assessment Approach 10.2 Project Benefits 10.3 Impact Assessment Results, Mitigation, Significance and Residual Effects 10.4 Cumulative Effects 10.5 Accidents and Malfunctions 10.6 Municipal, Provincial, Federal or Other Approvals or Permits 10.7 Future Commitments 10-1 • the magnitude, spatial extent, and duration of the effects; irregularities, but would have no measurable effect on the 10.1 Assessment Approach • the proportion of a species population or the number of population, entity or group as a whole. An assessment was undertaken to describe the potential people affected; environmental effects, both positive and negative of the • direct or indirect effects; Positive (P): An effect that exhibits a beneficial outcome. planning, construction and operational activities associated with • the degree to which the effect responds to mitigation; and the proposed DOTT project. The definitions of significance were adopted for use in this • the level of uncertainty about the possible effect. assessment because many of the impacts cannot be quantified in The assessment of effects involves applying the following steps: absolute terms, although changes and trends can be predicted.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Rationale Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue
    Planning Rationale Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue February 26, 2013 Our Mission Transformation through transportation. Our Vision To leverage the power of transportation and community to create a modern, integrated capital city that is environmentally, socially, economically and culturally sustainable and a desirable place for living, working and visiting. Light rail will shape how we grow our City. Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue Table of Contents 1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________ 4 2 Proposed Development _________________________________________________ 4 3 Purpose of Zoning By-law Amendment Application __________________________ 7 4 Purpose of Street Closing Application _____________________________________ 9 5 Provincial Policy Statement ______________________________________________ 9 6 Official Plan ___________________________________________________________ 9 7 Old Ottawa East Secondary Plan and Community Design Plan ________________ 11 8 Lees Station Transit-Oriented Development Study __________________________ 13 9 Conclusion___________________________________________________________ 14 Page 3 of 14 Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue 1 Introduction This Planning Rationale is intended to support a Zoning By-law Amendment application and a Street Closing application to permit a proposed parking lot with approximately 174 parking spaces at 193 and 200 Lees Avenue. 193 Lees Avenue is a triangular-shaped lot located at the southeast corner of Lees Avenue and Highway 417, as shown in Figure 1. The property is owned by the City of Ottawa and has a lot area of 0.32 ha. The site is used for a drive aisle for the University of Ottawa’s Lees Campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyst Package Q1 2009 for Pdfing
    CANADIAN APARTMENT PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED March 31, 2009 CANADIAN APARTMENT PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST For the three months ended March 31, 2009 Table of Contents Page Investor Information 1 Key Financial Data 2 Property Portfolio 3-4 Portfolio By Asset Type & Geography 5 Occupancy and Average Monthly Rent per Suite 6-8 Tenant Inducements and Vacancy Loss 9 Turnover and Renewals 10 NOI by Province 11 Profitability Analysis of Stabilized Properties 12 Debt Highlights 13 Capital Expenditures 14 CANADIAN APARTMENT PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST Investor Information As at March 31, 2009 Head Office: 11 Church Street, Suite 401 Toronto, Ontario M5E 1W1 Contact: Mr. Yazdi Bharucha Chief Financial Officer (416) 861-5771 [email protected] Research Coverage: Karine MacIndoe BMO Capital Markets (416) 359-4269 [email protected] Garreth MacRae BMO Capital Markets (416) 359-6769 [email protected] Jonathan Kelcher Canaccord Capital (416) 869-3260 [email protected] Alex Avery CIBC World Markets (416) 594-8179 [email protected] Jeffrey Roberts Desjardins Securities (416) 867-2048 [email protected] Michael Smith Macquarie Capital Markets (416) 848-3696 [email protected] Jimmy Shan National Bank Financial (416) 869-8025 [email protected] Tanya Bouchard National Bank Financial (416) 869-7934 [email protected] Kiran Mangat National Bank Financial (416) 869-8020 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Transportation Reference Materials
    LRT TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT STUDY AREAS SERVICING OVERVIEW Final Report, November 2013 APPENDIX A Transportation Reference Materials LRT TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT STUDY AREAS SERVICING OVERVIEW Final Report, November 2013 Existing Conditions 370000 375000 ± 5035000 5035000 Blair Rd. Montreal Rd. Macdonald Cartier Br. St. Laurent Blvd. ^_ Blair A Cyrville v i a 4 t 7 i 1 o d. n R P al k n w io y eg . R Train ^_ Lees ^_Hwy. 417 ^_Hwy. 417 ^_ St. Laurent Hw y. 417 ^_ Innes Rd. Main St. 5030000 Hurdman 5030000 Cycling Capture Area and Cycling Routes Smyth Rd. ^_ Future LRT Platform Bike Lane Multi-use Pathway Servicing Overview Study - Transportation Analysis Boundary Cycling Capture Area 0 500 1,000 Study Area Boundary m 1:50,000 V:\01225\active\other_pc\163401180\GIS\MXD\Powerpoint_Figures_08022013\163401180_PP_LRT_Cycling.mxdRevised: 2013-11-27 By: ncruikshank 370000 375000 370000 375000 74 . 1 Rd al ion eg ± R 5035000 5035000 ! ! ! ! Blair Rd. Montreal Rd. Macdonald Cartier Br. 4 17 d. l R St. Laurent Blvd. ! na io eg ! ! R ! ! ! Blair ^_ ! A Cyrville v i a !t io ! n P ! k w ! y ! !! . ! Train ! ^_ ! ! ! ! wy. 417 ! Lees ^_ H ! ! ! ! ! Hwy. 417 ! ^_ ! ^_ ! ! St. Laurent Hw ! y. 417 !! ^_ !! ! Innes Rd. Main St. ! 5030000 Hurdman 5030000 LRT Intersections ! Smyth Rd. ^_ Future LRT Platform ! ! TOD Study 1 Intersections ! TOD Study 2 Intersections Future LRT Cycling Capture Area Servicing Overview Study - Transportation Analysis Boundary Study Area Boundary 0 500 1,000 Approved TOD Area m 1:50,000 V:\01225\active\other_pc\163401180\GIS\MXD\Powerpoint_Figures_08022013\163401180_PP_LRT_Intersections.mxd Revised: By:2013-11-01 ncruikshank 370000 375000 City of Ottawa LOS A = 0.00 – 0.60 LOS B = 0.61 – 0.70 LOS C = 0.71 – 0.80 LOS D = 0.81 – 0.90 LOS E = 0.91 – 1.00 LOS F = > 1.00 All Intersections signalized unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLLTIFLR ISSN 0808-0506 DECEMBER 1984 Vol
    NEWSLLTIFLR ISSN 0808-0506 DECEMBER 1984 Vol . 12 No . 5 Jennifer Roddick, President Judy Deegan, Editor (990-6003) SEASON'S GREETINGS TO ALL MEMBERS FROM THE BOARD OF HERITAGE OTTAWA! Condominiums at Bay and James : winners of Infill Category FOURTH ANNUAL CITY OF OTTAWA ARCHITECTURAL CONSERVATION AWARDS For the fourth year in a row, the City BEST INFILL PROJECT : the 6-unit row of Ottawa bestowed awards on buildings house development at the corner of Bay which had been sensitively restored to and James in Centretown (shown above) . maintain their heritage flavour and to Architect James Colizza. blend in with other buildings in the The brick house on the corner, built neighbourhood . The winners received a in the late 1800s, was renovated into plaque . two separate units, but most of its In November, the City's Architectural historical trim and railings were Advisory Committee selected the follow- retained . Four new brick units, des- ing buildings from among 16 entries igned to look similar to the original for the awards : house, were added along James Street . The units sold for up to $165,000 . BEST COMMERCIAL RENOVATION : The Hope Building, 61-63 Sparks Street . The federal Department of Public Works BEST RESIDENTIAL RENOVATION : 62 Sweet- spent $58,000 to restore the building . land Avenue in Sandy Hill . Built in 1910 by noted Ottawa architect Owner Dolores LeBlanc Patenaude bought grey granite struc- Werner Noffke, the the 89-year-old Victorian house three was built for bookseller James ture years ago and did much of the restora- ground floor (which houses Hope .
    [Show full text]