DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Rationale Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Rationale Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue Planning Rationale Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue February 26, 2013 Our Mission Transformation through transportation. Our Vision To leverage the power of transportation and community to create a modern, integrated capital city that is environmentally, socially, economically and culturally sustainable and a desirable place for living, working and visiting. Light rail will shape how we grow our City. Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue Table of Contents 1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________ 4 2 Proposed Development _________________________________________________ 4 3 Purpose of Zoning By-law Amendment Application __________________________ 7 4 Purpose of Street Closing Application _____________________________________ 9 5 Provincial Policy Statement ______________________________________________ 9 6 Official Plan ___________________________________________________________ 9 7 Old Ottawa East Secondary Plan and Community Design Plan ________________ 11 8 Lees Station Transit-Oriented Development Study __________________________ 13 9 Conclusion___________________________________________________________ 14 Page 3 of 14 Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue 1 Introduction This Planning Rationale is intended to support a Zoning By-law Amendment application and a Street Closing application to permit a proposed parking lot with approximately 174 parking spaces at 193 and 200 Lees Avenue. 193 Lees Avenue is a triangular-shaped lot located at the southeast corner of Lees Avenue and Highway 417, as shown in Figure 1. The property is owned by the City of Ottawa and has a lot area of 0.32 ha. The site is used for a drive aisle for the University of Ottawa’s Lees Campus. The site is also traversed with underground municipal services and utilities. 200 Lees Avenue is located south of Highway 417 and Lees Avenue and adjacent to 193 Lees Avenue. The site is used for the University of Ottawa’s Lees Campus including institutional buildings and an open air stadium. The property is owned by the University of Ottawa and has a lot area of 6.07 ha. The site contains approximately 108 parking spaces. An existing driveway provides vehicular access to the site from a signalized intersection at Lees Avenue. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North: Highway 417 and Lees Avenue East: Rideau River with a pedestrian/cycling bridge located immediately east of 200 Lees Avenue South: Rideau River West: Transitway and Lees Avenue with the Lees Rapid Transit Station and high-rise residential uses located further to the west 2 Proposed Development The City is proposing to construct a parking lot with approximately 174 parking spaces at 193 Lees Avenue and part of 200 Lees Avenue. The proposed development includes the realignment of an existing east-west drive aisle, the provision of pedestrian and cycling facilities, and landscape planting. The new parking lot will replace 19 existing parking spaces, and will result in the net addition of 155 parking spaces. A concept plan showing the proposed parking lot location and general configuration is provided in Figure 2. One of the construction staging areas required for the construction of the Downtown tunnel for the Confederation Line Light Rail Transit project is located on part of Parking Lot K at Page 4 of 14 Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue Figure 1. Location Map. Page 5 of 14 Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue Figure 2. Concept Plan. Page 6 of 14 Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue the University of Ottawa’s Main Campus. This site is being provided to the Confederation Line’s design-build-finance-maintain contractor, the Rideau Transit Group, for 62 months commencing in April 2013. The construction staging area requirements will result in the temporary loss of 120 parking spaces from Parking Lot K during this time period. The construction of the proposed parking lot at 193 and 200 Lees Avenue is intended to partially compensate the University of Ottawa for the temporary loss of the parking spaces at Parking Lot K during the construction period for the Confederation Line project. The City will be responsible for the construction of the proposed parking lot on or before September 1, 2013. The University will be responsible for the repair and replacement of the asphalt surface, and the day-to-day maintenance and cleaning of the parking spaces, including, but not limited to snow removal and cleaning. The City is proposing to convey 193 Lees Avenue to the University of Ottawa within 60 days of completion of construction of the parking lot. The City is proposing to provide the parking rights for 92 parking spaces at Sandy Hill Arena to the University of Ottawa from April 2013 until August 2013 to temporarily offset the displaced parking spaces at Parking Lot K until the proposed parking lot has been constructed at 193 and 200 Lees Avenue. City Council passed a temporary Zoning By-law Amendment in January 2013 to permit the proposed parking arrangement at Sandy Hill Arena. 3 Purpose of Zoning By-law Amendment Application 193 Lees Avenue is zoned “I2A[350]” (Major Institutional Zone, Subzone 2A, Exception 350] in the City of Ottawa Zoning By-law No. 2008-250, as shown in Figure 3. Exception 350 prohibits all uses except for a utility installation. The existing zoning reflects a gas substation that was previously located on the property. The substation has been removed. The City’s Disposals and Environmental Remediation Unit conducted an internal and utility circulation of the property at 193 Lees Avenue in 2011. Based on the comments received from the circulation, there was no need identified to use the property for a utility installation. 200 Lees Avenue is zoned “I2A” (Major Institutional Zone, Subzone 2A). The zoning permits a broad range of uses including a post secondary educational institution. A Flood Plain zoning overlay applies to part of 200 Lees Avenue adjacent to the Rideau River. The purpose of the Zoning By-law Amendment application is to amend the existing zoning at 193 Lees Avenue from “I2A[350]” to “I2A[347]” to delete the exception that prohibits all uses except for a utility installation, and to add Exception 347. Exception 347 is a specific exception related to the University of Ottawa that allows for uses within certain zones to locate parking on Page 7 of 14 Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue other related sites. The purpose of the Zoning By-law Amendment application is also to amend the zoning at 200 Lees Avenue from “I2A” to “I2A[347]” so that both 193 Lees Avenue and 200 Lees Avenue maintain consistent zoning. In order to permit a parking lot to be constructed straddling two lots, it is requested that the following text be added to Exception 347: -193 Lees Avenue and 200 Lees Avenue are considered one lot for zoning purposes. Figure 3. Existing Zoning. WIGGINSWIGGINS PRIVPRIV CHAPELCHAPELCHAPEL CRES CRESCRES WIGGINSWIGGINS PRIVPRIV O1L[310]-h O1L[316]-h I1A R4T[483] LEESLEESLEES AVEAVEAVE LEESLEESLEES AVEAVEAVE ROBINSONROBINSON AVEAVE HURDMANHURDMAN RDRD LEESLEESLEES AVEAVEAVE IG1 F(1.5) L1 HURDMANHURDMAN RDRD ROBINSONROBINSON AVEAVE HWY417HWY417 IC118IC118 RAMP62RAMP62 HURDMANHURDMAN RDRD HIGHWAYHIGHWAY 417417 HIGHWAYHIGHWAY 417417 HIGHWAYHIGHWAY 417417 HWY417HWY417 IC118IC118 RAMP35RAMP35 HWY417HWY417HWY417 IC118 IC118IC118 RAMP35 RAMP35 RAMP35 I2A[350] HIGHWAYHIGHWAY 417417 O1L[316]-hO1L[316]-h GM[63] F(2.1) O1L[316]-h O1L[316]-h HWY417HWY417HWY417 IC118 IC118IC118 RAMP45 RAMP45 RAMP45 I2A LEESLEESLEES AVEAVEAVE LEESLEESLEESR5C[871] AVEAVEAVE H(75) LEESLEESLEES AVEAVEAVE O1 O1L[316]-h R4M EVELYNEVELYN AVE AVE O1C O1L[310]-h Page 8 of 14 Planning Rationale – Zoning By-Law Amendment and Street Closing Applications 193 and 200 Lees Avenue 4 Purpose of Street Closing Application 193 Lees Avenue was previously dedicated as public highway due to the former alignment of Lees Avenue prior to the construction of Highway 417. Lees Avenue was realigned to cross Highway 417 to the west of the site, and 193 Lees Avenue is now considered to be an “untravelled” street. Lees Avenue is identified in the Official Plan as an arterial road with a protected right-of-way width of 23 m between Main Street and Robinson Avenue. The existing right-of-way for Lees Avenue adjacent to 193 Lees Avenue has a width of approximately 40 m. As the existing right- of-way width exceeds the protected right-of-way width, there is no need to retain any part of 193 Lees Avenue as public highway. Accordingly, the purpose of the Street Closing application is to close 193 Lees Avenue as a public highway to allow for 193 Lees Avenue to be consolidated with 200 Lees Avenue and to permit the proposed parking lot. 5 Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement, issued under the authority of Section 3 of the Planning Act, provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The Planning Act states that a decision by Council on a planning matter shall be consistent with policy statements issued under the Act. The Provincial Policy Statement provides policy direction in three main areas: building
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Manager, Transportation Services, Vivi Chi, Director, Services Department Transportation Planning
    M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C E Information previously distributed / Information distribué auparavant TO: Transportation Committee DESTINATAIRE : Comité des transports FROM: John Manconi, Contact: Phil Landry, Director, Traffic General Manager, Transportation Services, Vivi Chi, Director, Services Department Transportation Planning EXPÉDITEUR : John Manconi, Personne ressource : Philippe Landry, Directeur général, Direction générale Gestionnaire, Services de la circulation, des transports Vivi Chi, Planification des transports, DATE: February 27, 2018 27 février 2018 FILE NUMBER: ACS2018-TSD-GEN-0001 SUBJECT: Report on the use of Delegated Authority during 2017 by the Transportation Services Department as set out in Schedule “G” Transportation Services of By-law 2016-369 OBJET : Rapport sur l’utilisation de Délégation de pouvoirs en 2017 par la direction générale des Services des Transports, comme il est indiqué à l’annexe G Services des Transports, du régulant 2016-369 PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to report to the Transportation Committee on the use of delegated authority for 2017 under Schedule ‘G’ – Transportation Services of By- Law 2016-369. 1 BACKGOUND By-law 2016-369 is “a by-law of the City of Ottawa respecting the delegation of authority to various officers of the City”. The By-law was enacted by Council on November 9, 2016 and is meant to repeal By-law No. 2014-435. This By-Law provides delegated authority to officers within the Transportation Services Department to perform various operational activities, and requires that use of delegated authority be reported to the appropriate standing committee at least once per year.
    [Show full text]
  • By Email January 15, 2021 Mayor
    By Email January 15, 2021 Mayor Jim Watson 110 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1 Dear Mayor Watson: Poorly Conceived Ward Boundary Change (uOttawa - Lees Campus) Affecting Capital Ward The Old Ottawa East Community Association respectfully requests that a change made during the course of the Ward Boundary Review be reversed before the by-law is proclaimed January 27, 2021. The change does not meet the City’s criteria required for a ward boundary change. Specifically, on December 9, 2020 City Council approved ward boundary changes that included the transfer of the University of Ottawa’s Lees Avenue campus from Capital Ward to Rideau-Vanier. This transfer was introduced by an unknown party near the end of the lengthy ward boundary consultation process but the Old Ottawa East Community Association and the Old Ottawa East community were not made aware of the change until after FEDCO had blessed it. Specifically, the “Recommendations Report” for Council recommended: “Move the Gee-Gees sports field from W6-19 (Capital) to W6-17 (Rideau-Vanier). The reasons given refer to a better boundary (the River rather than Highway 417) and the area’s association with sports facilities directly to the north in Rideau-Vanier. In the recommended ward boundary configuration, the Gee-Gees sports field is moved from W6-19 to W6-17. There are no residents in this area.” (p23) The report later says: “At Robinson Park and Gee Gees Field, #417 is not a big boundary; use the River instead.” (p34) …/2 - 2 - The fundamental criterion for making ward boundary changes is to “achieve voter parity." The transfer of the Lees campus will be detrimental to voter parity because Rideau-Vanier is forecast to grow faster than Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Commissions: Threads of an Ottawa Planning History
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 11:42 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine A History of Commissions Threads of An Ottawa Planning History Ken Hillis Volume 21, Number 1, October 1992 Article abstract Early planning in Ottawa takes the form of a piece-meal architectural URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019246ar admixture. On paper there remains a series of largely unrealized proposals DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar designed to promote an image symbolic of national identity. Successive federal and municipal agencies worked to various degrees of success to augment See table of contents Ottawa's appearance and amenity. British planner Thomas Adams' departure from, and the subsequent demise of the Federal Commission of Conservation in the early 1920's marked a low point in efforts to evolve comprehensive Publisher(s) planning strategies. The career of Noulan Cauchon, first head of the Ottawa Town Planning Commission, aimed to keep the notion of planning alive in the Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine city. Certain of his little-acknowledged proposals bear remarkable similarity to the pre-W.W. II planning efforts of MacKenzie King and Jacques Greber. ISSN Cauchon's legacy endures in proposals which appear to have been incorporated into federal planning activities during the post-war era. 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Hillis, K. (1992). A History of Commissions: Threads of An Ottawa Planning History. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 21(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1992 This document is protected by copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Robinson Avenue
    2 Robinson Avenue Planning Rationale + Design Brief Official Plan Amendment + Zoning By-law Amendment December 22, 2020 Prepared for Place Dorée Real Estate Holdings Inc. Prepared by Fotenn Planning + Design 396 Cooper St, Suite 300 Ottawa, ON K2P 2H7 December 2020 © Fotenn Planning + Design The information contained in this document produced by Fotenn is solely for the use of the Client identified above for the purpose for which it has been prepared and Fotenn undertakes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. \ 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Required Applications 1 1.2 Public Consultation Strategy 1 2.0 Site Context and Surrounding Area 3 2.1 Subject Site 3 2.2 Surrounding Context 3 2.3 Road Network 4 2.4 Transportation Network 4 2.5 Neighbourhood Amenities 6 3.0 Proposed Development and Design Brief 8 3.1 Project Overview 8 3.2 Massing and Scale 9 3.3 Public Realm 11 4.0 Policy and Regulatory Review 14 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement (2020) 14 4.2 City of Ottawa Official Plan (2003, as consolidated) 15 4.2.1 Managing Growth 15 4.2.2 Land Use Designation 16 4.2.3 Designing Ottawa 16 4.2.4 Urban Design and Compatibility 17 4.3 Sandy Hill Secondary Plan 21 4.4 Lees Transit Oriented Development Plan 22 4.5 Transit-Oriented Development Guidelines 25 4.6 Urban Design Guidelines for High-rise Buildings 27 4.7 University of Ottawa Campus Master Plan 28 4.8 Zoning By-law 2008-250 31 5.0 Proposed Amendments 35 5.1 Official Plan Amendment 35 5.2 Zoning By-law Amendment 35 6.0 Conclusions 37 1 Introduction Fotenn Planning + Design has been retained by Place Dorée Real Estate Holdings Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Link 2013/2014
    FOOD LINK 2013/2014 A Directory of Community Programs and Services Promoting Access to Food in Ottawa Just Food ottawa.ca/health | ottawa.ca/sante 613-580-6744 | TTY/ATS : 613-580-9656 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 3 COMMUNITY FOOD PROGRAMS................................................................................... 4 Ottawa Good Food Box.................................................................................... 4 Collaborative Food Pantry................................................................................ 6 Good Food Markets.......................................................................................... 6 Meals on Wheels............................................................................................. 7 Community Gardening Network of Ottawa......................................................9 Collective and Community Kitchens.............................................................. 14 Buns in the Oven Program............................................................................ 15 SCHOOL-BASED FOOD PROGRAMS.......................................................................... 17 Elementary Services.......................................................................................17 Colleges and Universities Nutrition Services..................................................18 FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 10.0 Environmental Effects, Significance and Mitigation
    10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, SIGNIFICANCE AND MITIGATION To a large degree, environmental effects were avoided or minimized to the extent possible due to the nature of the project (i.e., conversion from BRT to LRT); and during the evaluation of the alternatives and the selection of the preferred alternative. Moreover, many mitigation measures have been directly incorporated into the recommended plan. This section describes the environmental benefits and potential environmental effects of the proposed project and mitigation measures for the effects that cannot be avoided. Sections Include: 10.1 Assessment Approach 10.2 Project Benefits 10.3 Impact Assessment Results, Mitigation, Significance and Residual Effects 10.4 Cumulative Effects 10.5 Accidents and Malfunctions 10.6 Municipal, Provincial, Federal or Other Approvals or Permits 10.7 Future Commitments 10-1 • the magnitude, spatial extent, and duration of the effects; irregularities, but would have no measurable effect on the 10.1 Assessment Approach • the proportion of a species population or the number of population, entity or group as a whole. An assessment was undertaken to describe the potential people affected; environmental effects, both positive and negative of the • direct or indirect effects; Positive (P): An effect that exhibits a beneficial outcome. planning, construction and operational activities associated with • the degree to which the effect responds to mitigation; and the proposed DOTT project. The definitions of significance were adopted for use in this • the level of uncertainty about the possible effect. assessment because many of the impacts cannot be quantified in The assessment of effects involves applying the following steps: absolute terms, although changes and trends can be predicted.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyst Package Q1 2009 for Pdfing
    CANADIAN APARTMENT PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED March 31, 2009 CANADIAN APARTMENT PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST For the three months ended March 31, 2009 Table of Contents Page Investor Information 1 Key Financial Data 2 Property Portfolio 3-4 Portfolio By Asset Type & Geography 5 Occupancy and Average Monthly Rent per Suite 6-8 Tenant Inducements and Vacancy Loss 9 Turnover and Renewals 10 NOI by Province 11 Profitability Analysis of Stabilized Properties 12 Debt Highlights 13 Capital Expenditures 14 CANADIAN APARTMENT PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST Investor Information As at March 31, 2009 Head Office: 11 Church Street, Suite 401 Toronto, Ontario M5E 1W1 Contact: Mr. Yazdi Bharucha Chief Financial Officer (416) 861-5771 [email protected] Research Coverage: Karine MacIndoe BMO Capital Markets (416) 359-4269 [email protected] Garreth MacRae BMO Capital Markets (416) 359-6769 [email protected] Jonathan Kelcher Canaccord Capital (416) 869-3260 [email protected] Alex Avery CIBC World Markets (416) 594-8179 [email protected] Jeffrey Roberts Desjardins Securities (416) 867-2048 [email protected] Michael Smith Macquarie Capital Markets (416) 848-3696 [email protected] Jimmy Shan National Bank Financial (416) 869-8025 [email protected] Tanya Bouchard National Bank Financial (416) 869-7934 [email protected] Kiran Mangat National Bank Financial (416) 869-8020 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Transportation Reference Materials
    LRT TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT STUDY AREAS SERVICING OVERVIEW Final Report, November 2013 APPENDIX A Transportation Reference Materials LRT TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT STUDY AREAS SERVICING OVERVIEW Final Report, November 2013 Existing Conditions 370000 375000 ± 5035000 5035000 Blair Rd. Montreal Rd. Macdonald Cartier Br. St. Laurent Blvd. ^_ Blair A Cyrville v i a 4 t 7 i 1 o d. n R P al k n w io y eg . R Train ^_ Lees ^_Hwy. 417 ^_Hwy. 417 ^_ St. Laurent Hw y. 417 ^_ Innes Rd. Main St. 5030000 Hurdman 5030000 Cycling Capture Area and Cycling Routes Smyth Rd. ^_ Future LRT Platform Bike Lane Multi-use Pathway Servicing Overview Study - Transportation Analysis Boundary Cycling Capture Area 0 500 1,000 Study Area Boundary m 1:50,000 V:\01225\active\other_pc\163401180\GIS\MXD\Powerpoint_Figures_08022013\163401180_PP_LRT_Cycling.mxdRevised: 2013-11-27 By: ncruikshank 370000 375000 370000 375000 74 . 1 Rd al ion eg ± R 5035000 5035000 ! ! ! ! Blair Rd. Montreal Rd. Macdonald Cartier Br. 4 17 d. l R St. Laurent Blvd. ! na io eg ! ! R ! ! ! Blair ^_ ! A Cyrville v i a !t io ! n P ! k w ! y ! !! . ! Train ! ^_ ! ! ! ! wy. 417 ! Lees ^_ H ! ! ! ! ! Hwy. 417 ! ^_ ! ^_ ! ! St. Laurent Hw ! y. 417 !! ^_ !! ! Innes Rd. Main St. ! 5030000 Hurdman 5030000 LRT Intersections ! Smyth Rd. ^_ Future LRT Platform ! ! TOD Study 1 Intersections ! TOD Study 2 Intersections Future LRT Cycling Capture Area Servicing Overview Study - Transportation Analysis Boundary Study Area Boundary 0 500 1,000 Approved TOD Area m 1:50,000 V:\01225\active\other_pc\163401180\GIS\MXD\Powerpoint_Figures_08022013\163401180_PP_LRT_Intersections.mxd Revised: By:2013-11-01 ncruikshank 370000 375000 City of Ottawa LOS A = 0.00 – 0.60 LOS B = 0.61 – 0.70 LOS C = 0.71 – 0.80 LOS D = 0.81 – 0.90 LOS E = 0.91 – 1.00 LOS F = > 1.00 All Intersections signalized unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominees for Bishop Announced
    Page 2 Page 3 Page 6 Page 8 Bishop’s Greeting Pulling together for Christian Meet the Nominees Clergy focus on truth and Unity reconciliation March 2020 PHOTO: ARCHDEACON CHRIS DUNN Nominees Funding fuels Ellwood House for bishop expansion plan announced BY DAVID HUMPHREYS BY LEIGH ANNE WILLIAMS The vision of St. Thomas the Apostle parish in Alta Vista to expand Ellwood Five clergy members have been nominated House came a step closer to realization with to become the 10th bishop of the Diocese a $100,000 funding commitment from the of Ottawa in the Episcopal election to be City of Ottawa. held on March 14, 2020. Their names will Ellwood House is the affordable housing be familiar to many parishioners because project developed 32 years ago through they are all currently serving in the diocese. a partnership with the parish and the The nominees are: Anglican Diocese of Ottawa. Now, the The Ven. Peter John Hobbs, Director of parish and Ellwood House want to add 38 Mission for the Diocese of Ottawa new units to the existing 30. The Ven. Brian Kauk, Area Parish of The new funding will allow Ellwood Mississippi Lake, Archdeacon of Lanark- to complete planning requirements and Arnprior other activities to prepare submissions for The Ven. Kathryn Otley, Territorial capital grants, including Action Ottawa Archdeacon, Carleton Deanery and Canada Mortgage and Housing The Very Rev. Shane Parker, Dean Corporation (CMHC). of Ottawa and Rector of Christ Church “We are working to support the outreach Cathedral mission of St. Thomas and the diocese in The Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • 200 Lees Avenue Planning Rationale
    200 Lees Avenue Planning Rationale Site Plan Control Application June 2021 200 Lees Avenue Planning Rationale Site Plan Control Application June 2021 Prepared for: David Wroblewski, P.Eng., GSC, LEED GA, Senior Project Manager PCL Constructors Canada Inc. 49 Auriga Drive Nepean, Ontario K2E 8A1 T: 613-229-7104 E: [email protected] Prepared by: Nadia De Santi, RPP, MCIP, Practice Lead Planning, Landscape Architecture, and Urban Design WSP 2611 Queensview Drive, Suite 300 Ottawa, Ontario, K2B 8K2 T: 613-690-1114 E: [email protected] WSP 200 Lees Avenue Site Plan Control Application June 2021 Planning Rationale Page i PCL and University of Ottawa S i g n a t u r e s PREPARED BY Nadia De Santi, MCIP, RPP Kasper Koblauch, MCIP, RPP Practice Lead Project Planner This Planning Rationale was prepared by WSP Canada Inc. (“WSP”) for PCL on behalf of the University of Ottawa, in accordance with the agreement between WSP and the client. This Planning Rationale is based on information provided to WSP which has not been independently verified. The disclosure of any information contained in this Report is the sole responsibility of the client. The material in this Report, accompanying documents and all information relating to this activity reflect WSP’s judgment in light of the information available to us at the time of preparation of this Report. Any use which a third party makes of this Report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. WSP accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by a third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Report to Rapport Au: Built Heritage Sub-Committee / Sous-Comité Du
    1 Report to Rapport au: Built Heritage Sub-Committee / Sous-comité du patrimoine bâti July 13, 2017 / 13 juillet 2017 and / et Planning Committee / Comité de l'urbanisme August 22, 2017 / 22 aout 2017 and Council / et au Conseil September 13, 2017 / 13 septembre 2017 Submitted on July 6, 2017 Soumis le 6 juillet 2017 Submitted by Soumis par: Court Curry, Manager / Gestionnaire, Right of Way, Heritage and Urban Design Services / Services des emprises, du patrimoine et du design urbain Planning, Infrastructure and Economic Development Department / Direction de la planification, de l'Infrastructure et du développement économique Contact Person Personne ressource: Ashley Kotarba/David Maloney, Planner I / Urbaniste, Heritage and Urban Design / Services des emprises, du patrimoine et du design urbain, Heritage Services Section / Section des Services du Patrimoine (613) 580-2424, 23582, [email protected] (613) 580-2424, 14057, [email protected] Ward: CAPITAL (17) / CAPITALE (17) File Number: ACS2017-PIE-RHU-0016 SUBJECT: Heritage Inventory Project: Additions to Heritage Register – Old Ottawa East and Old Ottawa South 2 OBJET: Projet d’inventaire patrimonial : Ajouts au Registre de patrimoine – Vieil Ottawa-Est et Vieil Ottawa-Sud REPORT RECOMMENDATION That Built Heritage Sub-Committee recommend Planning Committee recommend Council approve the addition of the properties listed in Document 1 to the City of Ottawa’s Heritage Register, in accordance with Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que le Sous-comité du patrimoine bâti recommande au Comité de l’urbanisme de recommander à son tour au Conseil d’approuver l’ajout des propriétés énumérées dans le document 1 au Registre du patrimoine de la Ville d’Ottawa, conformément à l’article 27 de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Sandy Hill Comments on the CEDCSP, Jan. 4
    January 2021 Notes on Sandy Hill in the new Central and East Downtown Core Secondary Plan (CEDCSP) • In the draft new Official Plan, Sandy Hill is part of the newly designated Downtown Core Transect. Sandy Hill's Secondary Plan (originally conceived in 1979) has been folded into a new Central and East Downtown Core Secondary Plan. • In general, the role of secondary plans is to provide the strategic planning direction to guide future development and redevelopment. While the Official Plan contains policy direction, SPs begin to use more specific geographic and neighbourhood references to guide future development and redevelopment. A further level of direction is found in Community Design Plans (such as the one for Upper Rideau). • The new CEDCSP has amalgamated Sandy Hill, Centretown, and seven additional downtown areas into one document. The Centretown and Escarpment chapters in the Plan are markedly more developed as they have been through a community design process in recent years. • Action Sandy Hill’s (ASH) position is that the Sandy Hill section of the new CEDCSP, in particular compared to its compatriots with community design plans, fails to: o Acknowledge and describe the existing conditions, pressures, and challenges of the plan area (for example, that Sandy Hill is a near-campus neighbourhood to uOttawa, that it has suffered degradation of its built environment); o Articulate the cultural and heritage character and values of the plan area (for example, the entire plan area needs to be assessed for its heritage character–not just
    [Show full text]