KUNA IDENTITY and PANAMANIAN NATIONALISM UNDER the TORRIJOS REGIME, 1968-1981 by Sarah Foss Thesi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

KUNA IDENTITY and PANAMANIAN NATIONALISM UNDER the TORRIJOS REGIME, 1968-1981 by Sarah Foss Thesi AHORA TODOS SOMOS PANAMEÑOS: KUNA IDENTITY AND PANAMANIAN NATIONALISM UNDER THE TORRIJOS REGIME, 1968-1981 By Sarah Foss Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Latin American Studies August, 2012 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor William F. Robinson Professor Marshall C. Eakin To the indigenous peoples of Latin America, who daily fight against injustice to preserve their lands and cultures. In particular, I dedicate this project to the Bribri people of Costa Rica, who first opened my eyes to the indigenous struggle and to the Kuna people of Panamá, whose tenacity never ceases to inspire me. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the funding Vanderbilt's Center for Latin American Studies provided through the Tinker Foundation. With this financial assistance, I was able to spend two memorable months conducting research in Panama. As a young historian, I received much assistance and support from academics in both the United States and in Panama, and without their knowledge, advice, and direction, I never could have located the sources that shaped this project. Deepest thanks to Dr. W. Frank Robinson and Dr. Marshall Eakin for guiding both the research and the writing of this project. Dr. Gloria Rudolf, Dr. James Howe, and Dr. Michael Conniff greatly assisted me in networking with Panamanian historians and anthropologists. At the Universidad de Panamá, Professor Francisco Herrera guided me to the archives at the Congreso General Kuna office, which became my key reference material for this project. Many thanks to the Congreso General Kuna, who permitted me to use their archives and helped me schedule interviews with prominent Kuna leaders. Sr. Eligio Alvarado, former Intendant of San Blas, graciously gave me an interview and helped me to understand the nuances and contexts of the various documents I was reading. Sr. Bernal Castillo Díaz, a Kuna historian, welcomed me to his home and gave me ample time to study the archives from the Intendancy that he had in his possession. Finally, special thanks to Mónica Maury Martínez for providing me with copies of documents she located during her years of fieldwork in Kuna Yala. All of these individuals helped make this research experience fruitful and valuable in terms of this current project and also with respect to my future academic career. iii Finally, a grateful thank you to my husband, Josh, for supporting my research by tirelessly working to provide for us while I attend school and research abroad, for reading numerous early drafts of this project, and for always reminding me of the larger picture. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION.................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.............................................................................................ix Chapter I. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................1 II. THE BEGINNINGS OF PLURIETHNIC NATIONALISM: 1968-1971...................12 Introduction............................................................................................................12 General Torrijos Comes to Power .........................................................................13 Review of Nationalism Theory..............................................................................15 Omar Torrijos' Pluriethnic Nationalism ................................................................17 The San Blas Comarca, 1968-1971 .......................................................................19 Political Changes .......................................................................................22 Economic Changes ....................................................................................24 Sociocultural Changes ...............................................................................28 Conclusion .............................................................................................................32 III. THE EMERGENCE OF INCOMPATIBLE IDENTITIES: 1972-1975...................34 Introduction............................................................................................................34 The 1972 Constitution ...........................................................................................35 Manifestations of Conflicting Identities ................................................................42 Conclusion .............................................................................................................52 IV. CRISIS IN THE COMARCA: 1976-1978.................................................................54 Introduction............................................................................................................54 CGK Split ..............................................................................................................55 Canal Treaty Plebiscite..........................................................................................63 Crisis Resolution....................................................................................................71 Conclusion .............................................................................................................76 v V. BECOMING KUNA-PANAMANIAN: 1979-1981 ..................................................78 Introduction............................................................................................................78 Tourism..................................................................................................................79 Education ...............................................................................................................84 Economic Issues ....................................................................................................86 Governance Consolidation.....................................................................................89 Conclusion .............................................................................................................94 VI. EPILOGUE.................................................................................................................96 BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................100 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Distribution of Corregimientos in the 1977 Plebiscite ..............................................66 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Map of Panama............................................................................................................3 2. Map of San Blas...........................................................................................................4 3. Map of San Blas Corregimientos...............................................................................37 4. Parallel Governance Structures in the San Blas Comarca, 1972...............................40 5. Plebiscite Propaganda................................................................................................63 6. Flag-raising in Ailigandí............................................................................................67 7. Urban Kuna woman voting in 1978 elections ...........................................................73 viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Full Name Abbreviation Archivo de la Intendencia AI Bernal Castillo Díaz Collection BCD Congreso General de la Cultura Kuna CGCK Congreso General Kuna CGK Instituto Panameño de Turismo IPAT Instituto para la Formación y Aprovechamiento de Recursos IFARHU Ministerio de Desarollo Agropecuario MIDA Movimiento de la Juventud Kuna MJK Mónica Martínez Maury Collection MMM Partido Revolucionario Democrático PRD Rubén Kantule Collection RK ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Panama has a complex and controversial history, and since its inception, Panama has struggled to forge a nationalism that reflects cohesion and autonomy. A US traveler to Panama in 1919 wrote, A Panamanian cart, loaded with English tea biscuit...driven by a Hindu wearing a turban, drove up in front of a Chinese shop. The Jamaican clerk...the San Blas errand boy...a Spanish policeman...that is Panamá every day.1 This quote represents the ethnic diversity of Panamanian citizens, but throughout the first half of the 20th century, the Panamanian government fought this influx of foreigners, believing that only homogenization could unify the nation. The presidencies of the Arias brothers (1932-1936, 1940-1941, 1949-1951, 1968) prioritized the promotion of a unique Panamanian nationalism. Immigration policies varied from forced assimilation, segregation and discrimination, demonstrating how the elite defined "the Panamanian" as an individual with a Hispanic heritage, excluding other races and ethnicities.2 However, these policies shifted after World War II, particularly with the beginning of military rule in 1968, and multiculturalism became a crucial tenet of Panamanian national identity.3 1 Peter
Recommended publications
  • Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations
    Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs November 27, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30981 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Summary With five successive elected civilian governments, the Central American nation of Panama has made notable political and economic progress since the 1989 U.S. military intervention that ousted the regime of General Manuel Antonio Noriega from power. Current President Ricardo Martinelli of the center-right Democratic Change (CD) party was elected in May 2009, defeating the ruling center-left Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) in a landslide. Martinelli was inaugurated to a five-year term on July 1, 2009. Martinelli’s Alliance for Change coalition with the Panameñista Party (PP) also captured a majority of seats in Panama’s National Assembly. Panama’s service-based economy has been booming in recent years – with a growth rate of 7.6% in 2010 and 10.6% in 2011 – largely because of the ongoing Panama Canal expansion project, now slated for completion in early 2015. The CD’s coalition with the PP fell apart at the end of August 2011when President Martinelli sacked PP leader Juan Carlos Varela as Foreign Minister. Varela, however, retains his position as Vice President. Tensions between the CD and the PP had been growing throughout 2011, largely related to which party would head the coalition’s ticket for the 2014 presidential election. Despite the breakup of the coalition, the strength of the CD has grown significantly since 2009 because of defections from the PP and the PRD and it now has a majority on its own in the legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala
    Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala by Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada 2012 Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education University of Toronto 2012 Abstract Maya peoples in Guatemala continue to practice their Indigenous knowledge in spite of the violence experienced since the Spanish invasion in 1524. From 1991 until 1996, the state and civil society signed a series of Peace Accords that promised to better meet the needs of the Maya, Xinka, Garífuna and non-Indigenous groups living there. In this context, how does the current educational system meet the varied needs of these groups? My research investigates the philosophy and praxis of Maya Indigenous knowledge (MIK) in broadly defined educational contexts through the stories of 17 diverse Maya professional women and men involved in educational reform that currently live and work in Guatemala City. How do they reclaim and apply their ancestral knowledge daily? What possible applications of MIK can transform society? The findings reveal that MIK promotes social change and healing within and outside institutionalized educational spaces and argues that academia needs to make room for Indigenous theorizing mainly in areas of education, gender, knowledge production, and nation building. I analyze these areas from anticolonial and critical Indigenous standpoints from which gender and Indigenous identities weave through the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala Project
    PEACE BRIGADES INTERNATIONAL – GUATEMALA PROJECT MIP - MONTHLY INFORMATION PACKAGE – GUATEMALA Number 98, November 2011 1. NOTES ON THE CURRENT SITUATION 2. ACTIVITIES OF PBI GUATEMALA: WITHIN GUATEMALA 2.1 MEETINGS WITH GUATEMALAN AUTHORITIES, DIPLOMATIC CORPS AND INTERNATIONAL ENTITIES 2.2 MEETINGS WITH CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS 2.3 ACCOMPANIMENT 2.4 FOLLOW-UP 2.5 OBSERVATION 3. ACTIVITIES OF PBI GUATEMALA – OUTSIDE GUATEMALA 4. NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS 1. NOTES ON THE CURRENT SITUATION IMPUNITY The Convergence for Human Rights condemns an attempt to give immunity to military personnel accused of genocide Guatemala, 24.11.2011 (CA, SV) .- The Convergence for Human Rights denounced the attempt to pass a bill that favors military personnel accused of crimes against humanity, so that they cannot be judged by the Guatemalan courts. The independent MP Christian Bousinott presented under pretext of national urgency, the 37-11 Initiative, which according to Iduvina Hernandez, director of the Association for the Study and Promotion of Democratic Security (SEDEM) had already been passed by Congress in its second reading in 2008. However, when comparing the initiative now submitted, which was shelved for three years, Hector Nuila, Nineth Montenegro and Aníbal García-members of Congress, realized the phrase "with the exception of crimes considered against humanity " had been removed. They were forced to withdraw from the Chamber, to break quorum and prevent final approval of the document. Julio Solórzano Foppa, the son of one of the victims of internal armed conflict, said: "This was a deceitful and illegal act. They intended for us to believe that these falsified documents were the ones approved in 2008." Oswaldo Samayoa, human rights activist, said an investigation has begun to criminally prosecute those who collaborated in the falsification and manipulation of the draft.
    [Show full text]
  • BIENESTAR Y DESARROLLO Construyendo El Bienestar Para Todos DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO Gracias Por Su Lectura
    Ministerio de la Mujer y Poblaciones Vulnerables Cuadernos sobre Nº 9 Poblaciones Vulnerables 2013 BIENESTAR Y DESARROLLO construyendo el bienestar para todos DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO Gracias por su lectura. Ana Jara Velásquez, Ministra de la Mujer y Poblaciones Vulnerables – MIMP. Julio Andrés Rojas Julca, Viceministro de Poblaciones Vulnerables 2 Alfredo Alfaro, Director General de Población y Desarrollo. BIENESTAR Y DESARROLLO BIENESTAR “Toda persona tiene derecho a la vida, a su identidad, a su integridad moral, psíquica y física, y a su libre desarrollo y bienestar, así como a elegir su lugar de residencia, a transitarpor el territorio nacional y salir de él, salvo limitaciones por razones de sanidad o por mandato judicial o por aplicación de la ley de extranjería”. Constitución Política del Perú Ministerio de la Mujer y Poblaciones Vulnerables CONTENIDOS I. PRESENTACIÓN II. MARCO JURIDICO 3 III. CAMBIOS DEMOGRAFICOS EN LA POBLACION PERUANA BIENESTAR Y DESARROLLO BIENESTAR IV. Demográficos en la Población Peruana V. Migración Interna e Internacional VI. Envejecimiento de la población VII. La Política de Población para el Período 2010-2014 VIII. Programa de Acción de la Conferencia Internacional en Población y Desarrollo y su seguimiento después de 2014 IX. La población en el Perú X. Peruanos en el exterior XI. Los jóvenes en el Perú XII. Poblaciones vulnerables Ministerio de la Mujer y Poblaciones Vulnerables Presentación En el año 2021, año del Bicentenario de En el año 2013 los hombres llegan a 4 nuestra Independencia Nacional, el Perú millones 191 mil 713 y representan el 50,6% alcanzará los 33 millones 149 mil habitantes. de la población joven.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR AMBLER H. MOSS, JR. Interviewed by: Donald Barnes Initial interview date: December 13, 1988 Copyright 1998 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Panama 1978-1982 Initial involvement in Panama Panama Canal Treaties Latin American relations with U.S. after Treaty Working with Ellsworth Bunker and Sol Linowitz Omar Torrijos Noriega Relations with Noriega in the late 1980’s U.S. errors in dealing with Panama Ambassadorial control over embassy Experiences in Spain and Dominican Republic Torrijos Attitude towards President Carter Fatal plane crash Conclusions INTERVIEW [Note: This interview was not edited by Ambassador Moss.] Q: First of all, I would like to thank you for agreeing to this interview and talking about your career, particularly your Ambassadorship and I'd like to ask you first of all, how did you get to become an Ambassador? MOSS: Well, I guess my case was a little bit unusual and I wasn't quite a career Ambassador and wasn't quite a run-of-the-mill political appointee. I'd been in the Foreign Service as a career from 1964-1971, had served in Spain, on the Spanish Desk and at the U.S. Mission of the OAS. And, in that latter capacity, had worked for [Ambassador 1 Ellsworth] Bunker and [Ambassador Sol M.] Linowitz. I left in 1971, went into law practice in Europe, then came back in as a political appointee in the beginning of the Carter Administration in February of 1977. Invited by Linowitz and Bunker, who were the co-negotiators for the Panama Canal Treaty to join the negotiating team.
    [Show full text]
  • CEPPS FINAL REPORT Project Period: August 17, 2012 - January 31, 2017
    CEPPS FINAL REPORT Project period: August 17, 2012 - January 31, 2017 USAID Associate Cooperative Agreement No. AID-520-LA-12-00001, under the Leader Cooperative Agreement No. A-00-08-00350-00 Project Names: August 17, 2012 - September 30, 2014 GUATEMALA: Support Electoral and Political Parties Reform and Strengthen the Guatemalan Congress October 1, 2014 - January 31, 2017 GUATEMALA: Elections: More Inclusion, Less Violence Table of Contents Glossary of Project Acronyms ......................................................................................................3 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................9 Program Overview .......................................................................................................................12 Political Context ...........................................................................................................................15 Program Analysis .........................................................................................................................26 Objective 1 ..................................................................................................................................26 Objective 2 ..................................................................................................................................32 Objective 3 ..................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Money in Politics: Sound Political Competition and Trust in Government
    Background Paper MONEY IN POLITICS: SOUND POLITICAL COMPETITION AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT This paper was prepared by Mr. Bruno Wilhelm Speck in coordination with Paloma Baena Olabe for the OECD Policy Forum on "Restoring Trust in Government: Addressing Risks of Influence in Public Decision Making" hosted by the Public Sector Integrity Network, OECD, Paris, 14-15 November 2013. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MONEY IN POLITICS – WHAT IS IT ALL ABOUT? ......................................................................... 3 1.1 The difficult task of defining political financing .............................................................................. 4 1.2 What has been done so far and what is new about this initiative? .................................................... 6 1.2.1 Taking stock on regulations ......................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 Universal standards and best practices ...................................................................................... 10 2. A FRESH LOOK AT MONEY IN POLITICS ...................................................................................... 13 2.1 Enabling role of money in politics .................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Money influencing political competition ........................................................................................ 14 2.2.1 Donations from the private sector ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain • Carsten Jacob Humlebæk and Antonia María Ruiz Jiménez New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain
    New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain in Nationalism on Perspectives New • Carsten Humlebæk Jacob and Antonia María Jiménez Ruiz New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain Edited by Carsten Jacob Humlebæk and Antonia María Ruiz Jiménez Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Genealogy www.mdpi.com/journal/genealogy New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain New Perspectives on Nationalism in Spain Editors Carsten Humlebæk Antonia Mar´ıaRuiz Jim´enez MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editors Carsten Humlebæk Antonia Mar´ıa Ruiz Jimenez´ Copenhagen Business School Universidad Pablo de Olavide Denmark Spain Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genealogy/special issues/perspective). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03943-082-6 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03943-083-3 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND.
    [Show full text]
  • IFES, Faqs, 'Elections in Guatemala: 2019 General Elections', June 2019
    Elections in Guatemala 2019 General Elections Frequently Asked Questions Americas International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Floor 10 | Arlington, VA 22202 | www.IFES.org June 11, 2019 Frequently Asked Questions When is Election Day? ................................................................................................................................... 1 Who are citizens voting for on Election Day? ............................................................................................... 1 How is Guatemala’s political system structured? ......................................................................................... 1 What is the election management body? What are its powers? ................................................................. 2 What are the phases of the electoral process? ............................................................................................ 2 What are the reforms enacted in the new 2016 Electoral and Political Parties Law? ................................. 3 Who can vote in these elections? How many registered voters are there? How do citizens register to vote? ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Will there be out-of-country voting? ............................................................................................................ 5 Who are the presidential candidates? .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 405 Bernard Diederich Former Latin America Correspondent Bernard
    book reviews 405 Bernard Diederich Seeds of Fiction: Graham Greene’s Adventures in Haiti and Central America, 1954–1983. London: Peter Owen, 2012. 315 pp. (Cloth us$29.95) Former Latin America correspondent Bernard Diederich’s account of his rela- tionship with Graham Greene and their journeys to Haiti and Central America from the 1950s to the 1980s is a most valuable memoir and resource for those interested in the peripatetic author and the troubled Cold War politics of the region. The renowned twentieth-century British writer gives the now retired journalist the perfect entrée to his specialist subject of Latin America in a book that is neatly divided into two equal parts, firstly dealing with Greene in Haiti and later in Central America. Diederich, a New Zealander by birth, details his first brief encounters with Greene from 1954 onward in Haiti, where the correspondent had set up an English-language weekly newspaper and lived with his Haitian wife. Like many writers and artists, Greene was attracted by the exotic black Caribbean repub- lic, independent since 1804. But Haiti’s relative peace was ruined from 1957 by the autocratic rule of country physician François “Papa Doc” Duvalier, who soon ruled the ex-French colony as a repressive dictator, many of his subjects mesmerized by his cultivation of Voodoo. The early part of Diederich’s book gives an overview of Haitian history and is interspersed with travelogue. His newspaper’s anti-Duvalierist stance courts the wrath of the country’s self-appointed president-for-life and his Tontons Macoutes, a murderous plain-clothes militia.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama and Noriega: “Our SOB” Scott Rosenberg
    Panama and Noriega: “Our SOB” Scott Rosenberg On December 20, 1989, approximately twenty seven thousand American troops invaded Panama with the goals of apprehending Panama’s military dictator and de facto leader General Manuel Noriega and restoring democracy throughout the country. The invasion occurred a year and a half after two Florida grand juries indicted General Noriega on federal drug trafficking charges and after he had survived months of economic sanctions and back-channel tactics aimed at forcing him out. The morning following the invasion, President George H.W. Bush addressed the nation and described the objectives and reasons for “Operation Just Cause,” revealing that “the goals of the United States have been to safeguard the lives of Americans, to defend democracy in Panama, to combat drug trafficking, and to protect the integrity of the Panama Canal treaty.”i In retrospect, however, it appears clear that the United States could have rightly used the same justifications six years earlier, shortly after General Noriega assumed power in 1981. Why did the U.S. government wait so long, and what finally prompted it to invade and forcibly oust him in 1989? Historians have argued that Noriega’s drug trafficking and election tampering forced the United States’ hand, but I believe that it was his arrogance and utter lack of responsiveness to U.S. demands that eventually sealed his fate. Noriega had been involved in the international narcotics trade for years,ii and began installing puppet Panamanian presidents through election fraud as early as 1984, but the United States was willing to accept this activity because of his cooperation with what was perceived to be greater U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan De Acción Nacional En Derechos Humanos, 2007-2017
    EL PLAN DE ACCIÓN NACIONAL EN DERECHOS HUMANOS 2007-2017 Guatemala, Septiembre del 2007. 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Plan de Acción Nacional en Derechos Humanos, 2007-2017 INDICE Pág. Plan de Acción Nacional en Derechos Humanos 2007-2017 I Presentación 5 II Marco General del Plan de Acción Nacional en Derechos Humanos 7 III Marco Conceptual y Jurídico sobre las obligaciones del Estado Guatemalteco en Materia de Derechos Humanos 9 3.1 Ámbito Nacional 9 3.1.1 La Dignidad de la Persona y el derecho a la Diferencia como Fundamento del Estado de Derecho 10 3.2 Ámbito Internacional 11 IV Metodología para la Sistematización de las Propuestas Formuladas en Derechos Humanos 12 V Diagnóstico Situacional de los Derechos Humanos 15 VI Plan de Acción Nacional en Derechos Humanos 18 6.1 Misión 18 6.2 Visión 6.3 Principios Rectores 18 6.3.1 Consenso 6.3.2 Temporalidad 6.3.3 Participación 6.3.4 Ius Cogens o Derecho de Gentes, Derecho Internacional 6.3.5 Buena Fe y obligatoriedad 6.3.6 Complementariedad 6.3.7 Desarrollo Progresivo 6.3.8 Integralidad 6.3.9 Igualdad de Trato y No Discriminación 6.4 Objetivo General 20 6.5 Líneas Estratégicas 20 6.5.1 Institucionalizar y transversalizar el enfoque de Derechos Humanos en las Políticas Públicas 6.5.2 Contribuir a la difusión del enfoque de Derechos Humanos en las instituciones del Estado y la sociedad civil 6.5.3 Asegurar la plena vigencia de los Derechos Humanos Integrales 6.5.4 Implementar políticas que contengan acciones afirmativas 2 Plan
    [Show full text]