DOCSLIB.ORG

South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application Rev

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application Rev NRC-006C Rev. 12 STP 3 & 4 Final Safety Analysis Report 2.1 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Standard Plant The information in this section of the reference ABWR DCD, including all tables, is incorporated by reference with the following site-specific supplements in Table 2.1-1. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of: NUCLEAR INNOVATION NORTH AMERICA LLC (South Texas Project Units 3 and 4) Commission Mandatory Hearing Docket #: 05200012 & 05200013 Exhibit #: NRC-006C-MA-CM01 Identified: 11/19/2015 Admitted: 11/19/2015 Withdrawn: Rejected: Stricken: Other: Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Standard Plant 2.1-1 Rev. 12 STP 3 & 4 Final Safety Analysis Report Table 2.1-1 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Design The supplementary information, provided in the column marked "Discussion," consists of a statement as to whether the SRP limits specified for the reference ABWR design are met for the STP 3 & 4 site, and a roadmap to the FSAR sections where further discussion is provided. SRP Section Subject Limits Discussion Geography and Demography 2.1.1 Site Location and None N/A Description 2.1.2 Exclusion Area None N/A Authority and Control 2.1.3 Population None N/A Distribution Nearby Industrial, Transportation and Military Facilities 2.2.1- Identification of Identify potential hazards in the site The potential external hazards 2.2.2 Potential Hazards vicinity that have a probability of in the vicinity of the STP site are in Site Vicinity occurrence >10-7 per year which identified in Subsections 2.2S.1 produce: and 2.2S.2. The only potential (1) missiles more energetic than the external hazard identified with a tornado missile spectra, or frequency near 1 x 10-7 was an (2) pressure effects in excess of the aircraft accident with a design basis tornado. conservatively calculated total impact frequency of 1.09 x 10-7. 2.2.3 Evaluation of Evaluate only those potential An evaluation of the aircraft Potential Accidents hazards identified above. hazards that could impact the STP site is provided in Subsection 2.2S.2.7.2. Although no other external hazards approach a frequency of 1 x 10- 7, other potential external hazards in the vicinity of the STP site are discussed in Subsection 2.2S.3. 2.1-2 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Standard Plant Rev. 12 STP 3 & 4 Final Safety Analysis Report Table 2.1-1 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Design SRP Section Subject Limits Discussion Meteorology 2.3.1 Regional Per Table 2.0-1. The ABWR site parameters Climatology specified in Table 2.0-1 envelop the STP site-specific characteristics related to regional climatology, with the following exceptions, maximum rainfall rate and ambient design temperatures relative to three of the wet-bulb exceedance values. These departures are discussed in Table 2.0-2 (see also STP DEP T1 5.0-1). Further details on regional climatology are provided in Subsection 2.3S.1. 2.3.2 Local Meteorology None N/A 2.3.3 Onsite None N/A Meteorological Measurements Program 2.3.4 Short-Term Show that the site meteorological The design basis accident Diffusion dispersion values as calculated in doses calculated based on the Estimates for accordance with Regulatory Guide STP site meteorological Accidental 1.145, and compared to dose dispersion values are Atmospheric values given in Chapter 15, result in discussed in Subsections 15.2, Releases doses less than stipulated in 10 15.56, and 15.7. The calculated CFR 100 and the applicable doses meet the dose limits portions of SRP Sections 11 and specified in 10 CFR 100. 15. 2.3.5 Long-Term None N/A Diffusion Estimates Hydrology Engineering 2.4.1 Hydraulic Per Table 2.0-1. The ABWR site parameters Description specified in Table 2.0-1 envelop the STP site-specific characteristics related to hydrology. Further details are provided in Subsection 2.4S.1. Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Standard Plant 2.1-3 Rev. 12 STP 3 & 4 Final Safety Analysis Report Table 2.1-1 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Design (Continued) SRP Section Subject Limits Discussion 2.4.2 Floods Per Table 2.0-1. The maximum flood level for the STP site is discussed in Subsections 2.4S.2 and 2.4S.4 (see also Table 2.0-2 and STP DEP T1 5.0-1). Site-specific flood protection measures are described in Subsection 3.4.1.1.1. 2.4.3 Probable None N/A Maximum Flood on Streams and Rivers 2.4.4 Potential Dam Demonstrate that failure of existing Failure of the Main Cooling Failures and potential upstream or Reservoir (MCR) would result in Seismically downstream water control the worst case flood level, and Induced structures will not exceed flooding exceeds the SRP limit for the 30.5 cm below grade. reference ABWR design as discussed in Subsection 2.4S.4 see also Table 2.0-2 and STP DEP T1 5.0-1). Site-specific flood protection measures are described in Subsection 3.4.1.1.1. 2.4.5 Probable Probable maximum surge and The probable maximum surge Maximum Surge seiche flooding level 30.5 cm below flooding level is within the SRP and Seiche grade. limit for the reference ABWR Flooding design. Flooding due to seiche effects is considered insignificant at the STP site. See Subsection 2.4S.5 for further details. 2.4.6 Probable Probable maximum tsunami The probable maximum tsunami Maximum Tsunami flooding level 30.5 cm below grade. flooding level for the STP site is within the SRP limit for the reference ABWR design as discussed in Subsection 2.4S.6. 2.4.7 Ice Effects None N/A 2.4.8 Cooling Water None N/A Channels and Reservoirs 2.4.9 Channel Diversion None N/A 2.1-4 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Standard Plant Rev. 12 STP 3 & 4 Final Safety Analysis Report Table 2.1-1 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Design (Continued) SRP Section Subject Limits Discussion 2.4.10 Flooding None N/A Protection Requirements 2.4.11 Cooling Water None N/A Supply 2.4.12 Groundwater Per Table 2.0-1. The groundwater depth in the power block areas for STP 3 & 4 is below the maximum groundwater level of 61 cm (2 ft) below grade as specified in Table 2.0-1. Further information is provided in FSAR Subsection 2.4S.12. 2.4.13 Accidental None N/A Releases of Liquid Effluent in Ground and Surface Waters 2.4.14 Technical None N/A Specifications and Emergency Operation Requirement Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Standard Plant 2.1-5 Rev. 12 STP 3 & 4 Final Safety Analysis Report Table 2.1-1 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Design (Continued) SRP Section Subject Limits Discussion Geology, Seismology and Geotechnical Engineering 2.5.1 Basic Geology and None N/A Seismic Information 2.5.2 Vibratory Ground Per Table 2.0-1. The ABWR DCD design Motion parameters specified in Table 2.0-1 related to seismology are enveloped for the STP site. Further details are provided in Subsection 2.5S.2. 2.5.3 Surface Faulting No faulting at or near the ground There is no potential for surface surface is accepted. faulting through the STP 3 & 4 site footprint as discussed in Subsection 2.5S.3. 2.5.4 Stability of Per Table 2.0-1. The ABWR site parameters Subsurface specified in Table 2.0-1 envelop Materials and the STP site-specific Foundations characteristics related to stability of subsurface materials and foundations. Further details are provided in Subsection 2.5S.4. 2.5.5 Surface of Slopes None N/A 2.1-6 Limits Imposed on SRP Section II Acceptance Criteria by ABWR Standard Plant Rev. 12 STP 3 & 4 Final Safety Analysis Report 1.1 Introduction The information in this section of the reference ABWR DCD, including all subsections and figures, as modified by the STP Nuclear Operating Company Application to Amend the Design Certification rule for the U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR), "ABWR STP Aircraft Impact Assessment (AIA) Amendment Revision 3," dated September 23, 2010 is incorporated by reference with departures and supplements. STD DEP 1.1-1 STP DEP 1.1-2 STP DEP 10.1-3 (Figure 1.1-2) STD DEP Vendor 1.1.1 Format and Content The information in this subsection of the reference ABWR DCD is incorporated by reference with the following site-specific supplement. The STP Combined License Application (COLA), Part 2, Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) incorporates the ABWR DCD, as applicable, by reference, without repeating the information from the DCD. The reference ABWR DCD refers to U.S. ABWR Design Control Document, GE Nuclear Energy, Revision 4 dated March 1997, as approved in 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix A, and as modified by the STP Nuclear Operating Company Application to Amend the Design Certification Rule for the U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR), "ABWR STP Aircraft Impact Assessment (AIA) Amendment Revision 3," dated September 23, 2010. The FSAR, as required by the ABWR design certification rule (10 CFR 52, Appendix A, Section IV.A.2.a), maintains the ABWR DCD organization and numbering system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CITY of ROCKPORT AGENDA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 6:30 P.M., Tuesday, July 24, 2012 Rockport City Hall, 622 East Market Stree
    CITY OF ROCKPORT AGENDA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 6:30 p.m., Tuesday, July 24, 2012 Rockport City Hall, 622 East Market Street NOTICE is hereby given that the Rockport City Council will hold a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 at 6:30 p.m. at the Rockport City Hall, 622 E. Market, Rockport, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed to wit: I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD - “At this time, comments will be taken from the audience on any subject matter that is not on the agenda. To address the Council, please sign the Speaker’s Card located on the table outside the Council Chamber and deliver to the City Secretary before the meeting begins. In accordance with the Open Meetings Act, Council may not discuss or take action on any item which has not been posted on the agenda.” IV. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING - Rockport City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a Joint Public Hearing to consider a request for a special permit on property located at 1521 Sixteenth Street; also known as Lot 77, Block 250, (10 acres) Swickheimer Subdivision, Rockport, Aransas County, Texas to build a commercial boat barn and residence. V. CONSENT AGENDA - “All consent agenda items listed are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda”.
    [Show full text]
  • Fws–R2–Es–2019–0061; Ff09e21000 Fxes11110900000 212]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/26/2021 and available online at Billing Code 4333–15 federalregister.gov/d/2021-18012, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [FWS–R2–ES–2019–0061; FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212] RIN 1018–BD16 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status with Critical Habitat for Guadalupe Fatmucket, Texas Fatmucket, Guadalupe Orb, Texas Pimpleback, and False Spike, and Threatened Species Status with Section 4(d) Rule and Critical Habitat for Texas Fawnsfoot AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS), propose to list six Central Texas mussel species: the Guadalupe fatmucket (Lampsilis bergmanni), Texas fatmucket (Lampsilis bracteata), Texas fawnsfoot (Truncilla macrodon), Guadalupe orb (Cyclonaias necki), Texas pimpleback (Cyclonaias (=Quadrula) petrina), and false spike (Fusconaia (=Quincuncina) mitchelli) as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After review of the best available scientific and commercial information, we find that listing Guadalupe fatmucket, Texas fatmucket, Guadalupe orb, Texas pimpleback, and false spike as endangered species is warranted, and listing Texas fawnsfoot as a threatened species is warranted. We propose a rule issued under section 4(d) of the Act (“4(d) rule”) for the Texas fawnsfoot. If we finalize this rule as proposed, it would add these species to the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and extend the Act’s protections to the species. We also propose to designate critical habitat for all six species under the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Rule
    Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [FWS–R2–ES–2019–0061; FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212] RIN 1018–BD16 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status with Critical Habitat for Guadalupe Fatmucket, Texas Fatmucket, Guadalupe Orb, Texas Pimpleback, and False Spike, and Threatened Species Status with Section 4(d) Rule and Critical Habitat for Texas Fawnsfoot AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS), propose to list six Central Texas mussel species: the Guadalupe fatmucket (Lampsilis bergmanni), Texas fatmucket (Lampsilis bracteata), Texas fawnsfoot (Truncilla macrodon), Guadalupe orb (Cyclonaias necki), Texas pimpleback (Cyclonaias (=Quadrula) petrina), and false spike (Fusconaia (=Quincuncina) mitchelli) as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After review of the best available scientific and commercial information, we find that listing Guadalupe fatmucket, Texas fatmucket, Guadalupe orb, Texas pimpleback, and false spike as endangered species is warranted, and listing Texas fawnsfoot as a threatened species is warranted. We propose a rule issued under section 4(d) of the Act (“4(d) rule”) for the Texas fawnsfoot. If we finalize this rule as proposed, it would add these species to the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and extend the Act’s protections to the species. We also propose to designate critical habitat for all six species under the Act. In total, approximately 1,944 river miles (3,129 river kilometers) in Texas fall within the boundaries of the proposed critical habitat designations.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Our 2019 Community Health Needs Assessment
    COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT May 1 – 03, 2019 Prepared by: Dave Clark 2 TORCH Management Services, Inc. (“TORCH”) appreciates Robert A. Pascasio, FACHE; Administrator/CEO, of Palacios Community Medical Center (“PCMC” or the “Hospital”) for giving TORCH the opportunity to conduct, and for providing assistance throughout, the compilation of the Community Health Needs Assessment. I would like to extend special appreciation to Huyen Jessica Tran of the hospital for assistance in scheduling the participants for the focus groups and their warm hospitality to all the participants. TORCH also appreciates the time and effort the focus group participants made to provide their thoughts and insights concerning the health needs of Palacios, Texas and the secondary market including Markham, Midfield, Blessing, Matagorda and El Campo. Palacios Community Medical Center Community Health Needs Assessment Conducted: May 1 - 03, 2019 Dave Clark, TORCH Management Services, Inc. 3 CONTENTS General Overview. …………….………………………………………………...………….…4 A History Lesson………….…………....…………………….……………....... .…………….6 Hospital Biography………….……………………….…….….………… …………………..10 Area Hospital Experience……………………….……….………………………………….17 Matagorda County Profile……….……………………….….…………… ……….…….….19 Health Status of the Rural Community…………….………..……….…………..…….…28 How Does Palacios Stand Among the others.....…….……..…......................…….….33 Palacios Health Status………….…………….…….………………….……….…..….……34 Identification and Prioritization of Health Needs.………….…………….…….……….35 Community Healthcare
    [Show full text]
  • 1. 2. 3. 3.I. 4. 4.I. 4.Ii. 5. 5.I. 5.Ii. 6. 7. 7.I. Regular Meeting of The
    REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARANSAS PASS 600 W. CLEVELAND, ARANSAS PASS, TEXAS MAY 1, 2017 - 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 3. PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS. 3.I. Proclamation Designating The Month Of May 2017, As "Fair Housing Month". Documents: PROCLAMATION.PDF 4. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. 4.I. Memorial Commission Documents: AGENDA MEMO - MEMORIAL COMMISSION.PDF BOARD APPLICATIONS.PDF 4.II. Aransas Pass Municipal Development District Documents: AGENDA MEMO - AP MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.PDF BOARD APPLICATION - DORRIS.PDF 5. CONSENT AGENDA. All of the following items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 5.I. Ordinance No. 2017-4186 Ordinance of the City of Aransas Pass, Texas, closing a portion of the right-of-way of West Wilson Avenue to vehicular traffic in conjunction with the Aransas Pass shared use path project, and providing for an effective date. Documents: ORD. NO. 2017-4186.PDF 5.II. Approval Of Regular Meeting Minutes Of March 20, 2017 And April 3, 2017. Documents: 03-20-17.PDF 04-03-17.PDF 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE. 7. CITY MANAGER. 7.I. Consider And Act On Request From Aransas Pass Chamber Of Commerce To Temporarily Close Streets During The Shrimporee Event During June 9-11, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Basin Highlights Report a Watershed Characterization of Little White Oak Bayou, Clear Creek Tidal, Clear Creek Above Tidal, Mustang Bayou, and Halls Bayou
    2020 Basin Highlights Report A Watershed Characterization of Little White Oak Bayou, Clear Creek Tidal, Clear Creek Above Tidal, Mustang Bayou, and Halls Bayou INTRODUCTION Whether it is swimming, shipping, fishing, industry, or tourism, water is integral to the way of life for the 6.5 million people living in the Houston-Galveston region. With over 16,000 miles of streams and shorelines, water is all around us. The water that flows through our ditches, creeks, streams, bayous, and rivers feed into one of the nation’s most productive estuaries, Galveston Bay, before entering the Gulf of Mexico. These waters fuel our economy, bringing in billions of dollars and providing tens of thousands of jobs. Over 6.5 million people share these resources, and with another 3.8 million people expected to move to the region over the next 20 years, the strain put on these water resources will continue to rise. The 2020 Basin Highlights Report provides watershed characterizations for several stream segments within the region. This report characterizes the Little White Oak Bayou (Segment 1013A), Clear Creek Tidal (Segment 1101), Clear Creek Above Tidal (Segment 1102), Mustang Bayou (Segment 2432A), and Halls Bayou (Segment 2432C) watersheds. The watershed characterizations identify: • Specific water quality issues and trends; • Sources of point and nonpoint source pollution; • Current strategies and plans to reduce pollution within these watersheds; and • Current and potential stakeholders within these watersheds. H-GAC’s CLEAN RIVERS PROGRAM The Houston-Galveston Area Council’s (H-GAC) Clean River Program is charged with conducting water quality monitoring and assessment to determine the health of water bodies throughout the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Price Ranch Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
    Price Ranch Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 183.76 Acre site along Texas State Highway 35 Gregory, San Patricio County, Texas Prepared For: Prepared By: 400 S Padre Island Dr STE 205 Corpus Christi, Texas 78405 Testengeer Project No. 20109838 December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Special Terms and Conditions .......................................................................................... 1 1.3 General Limitations ............................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Information Sources ............................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2 2.1 Location ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Legal Description ................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 Property and Vicinity Characteristics ................................................................................. 2 2.4 Easements and Right of Ways ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ±25 Acres ±25 Acres at Nwc Fm 528 & Narnia
    ±25 ACRES AT NWC FM 528 & NARNIA WAY BROKER CONTACT: David Marshall, Principal | [email protected] | 713.955.3126 NARNIA WAY ±25 ACRES dmre.com 1 PROPERTY DETAILS NWC FM 528 & Narnia Way ADDRESS Houston, TX 77003 LAT., LONG. 29.497284, -95.207363 SIZE ±25 Acres UTILITIES Avaiable (Water & Electricity) Friendswood ISD: SCHOOLS Friendswood Jr HS Friendswood HS PARCEL ID 0128-0004-0000-000 OWNER Hal Boone PRICE TBD by Market RESTRICTIONS None ZONING Community Shopping Center (C-1/CSC) ABST 128 A JACKSON SUR TR 4, ACRES LEGAL 37.708 DETENTION Onsite FLOODPLAIN No dmre.com 2 2019 DEMOGRAPHICS 0-1 mi 0-3 mile 0-5 miles 2019 POPULATION ESTIMATE 6,341 40,472 118,057 5-YR EST. POPULATION GROWTH 8.5% 7.6% 7.8% AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME $175,762 $127,023 $115,366 MEDIAN VALUE OF OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS $309,009 $259,517 $225,442 2019 TAX RATES MAKING AN OFFER C37 FRIENDSWOOD CITY 0.521439 Offers should be presented in the form of a non-binding Letter of Intent, and should include: CAD APPRAISAL DISTRICT 0.000000 • Pricing • Description of Debt/Equity Structure D08 GALV CNTY CONSOLIDATED DRAINAGE 0.112200 • Due Diligence and Closing Timeframe • Qualifications to Close GGA GALVESTON COUNTY 0.504396 • Earnest Money Deposit • Development Plans RFL CO ROAD & FLOOD 0.011741 Dosch Marshall Real Estate (DMRE) has been exclusively retained to represent the Seller in the marketing and sale of this property. S12 FRIENDSWOOD ISD 1.259400 All inquiries about the Property should be directed to DMRE. CLICK HERE FOR LISTING TOTAL 2.680443 dmre.com 3 dmre.com 3 PROPERTY SURVEY 1263.55' 992.7' ±25 ACRES 307.2' 895.98' 297.4' 798.6' dmre.com 4 PRIME LOCATION DEVELOPMENT SITE IN FRIENDSWOOD • Located in Friendswood, TX which is conveniently located between downtown Houston, Galveston, and near three major airports.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Ordinance
    ORDINANCE NO. 2126 AN ORDINANCE REVISING THE CITY OF PORTLAND WATER CONSERVATION PLAN; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY AND SPECIFICALLY NEGATING A REQUIREMENT OF A CULPABLE MENTAL STATE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS Section 13.145; 17.125(b); 17.277(b) of the Texas Water Code all requires public water supply systems in Texas with 3,300 connections or greater to prepare a water conservation plan; and, WHEREAS the City of Portland previously revised its Water Conservation Plan March (WCP) on 17, 2009, and the City Council has determined it is necessary to make revisions to the WCP; and, WHEREAS the City Council has determined that the revisions to the Plan are necessary for the orderly and efficient management of limited water supplies by reducing the volume of water withdrawn from the water supply source, reducing the loss or waste of water, maintaining or improving the efficiency in the use of water and increasing the recycling and reuse of water. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND, TEXAS: SECTION 1. CITY OF PORTLAND WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ADOPTION The City of Portland Code of Ordinances Chapter 23, Article III, Division 1, Section 23- 111, is hereby repealed and replaced with The City of Portland Water Conservation Plan attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. SECTION 2. REPEALER All previously adopted rules, regulations, policies and ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Aransas National Wildlife Refuge
    SYLLABUS This Final Feasibility Report presents the results of investigations to provide protection to the critical habitat area of the endangered whooping crane. Justification for measures recommended in this report are based on provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The Gulf Intracoastal Waterway traverses approximately 31 miles of the critical habitat area and includes portions of the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge and the privately-owned Welder Flats area and State-owned Welder Flats Coastal Preserve located on the easterly portion of the study area. Erosion along the channel banks is occurring from a combination of causes, including waterway usage and natural processes. Various alternatives to reduce erosion through this reach and to minimize impacts from possible contaminant spills that could occur from waterway traffic were investigated. These measures included channel rerouting outside of the critical habitat, alternate routes within the critical habitat, and retention of the existing channel alignment. As a result of these investigations and through coordination with the various Federal and State resource agencies, the plan ultimately selected consists of providing 62,000 feet of bank protection for erosion control and the installation of permanent facilities for ready­ deployment of spill control measures. The recommended bank protection is in addition to that previously installed (prior to 1996) as well as that which is planned to be installed through 1997 under the Operations and Maintenance program. This report has demonstrated a Federal interest in providing erosion protection to areas within the critical habitat of the endangered whooping crane adjacent to the waterway and providing spill containment features and equipment to protect those areas from accidental hazardous spills.
    [Show full text]
  • Dredged Material
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-01/1733-S 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date TEXAS GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (GIWW) DREDGED September 2000 MATERIAL: BENEFICIAL USES, ESTIMATING COSTS, DISPOSAL 6. Performing Organization Code ANALYSIS ALTERNATIVES, AND SEPARATION TECHNIQUES 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Robert Randall, Billy Edge, John Basilotto, David Cobb, Sara Graalum, Qi Report 1733-S He, and Michael Miertschin 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 0-1733 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Project Summary Construction Division September 1996- August 1998 Research and Technology Transfer Section 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 5080 Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Research Project Title: Alternative Dredging and Disposal Methods for the Texas Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) 16. Abstract A two-year project, Alternative Dredging and Disposal Methods for the Texas Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, investigates the cost and engineering of long distance pumping, beneficial uses of GIWW-dredged material for the Texas coastal zone, separation techniques for GIWW-dredged material, optimum slurry flow, and alternatives for analyzing dredged material disposal. A cost-estimating program incorporates fuel costs, dredge crew labor costs, routine maintenance and repairs, major repairs, overhead costs, depreciation, profit, mobilization and demobilization, and capital investment cost for a cutter suction dredge.
    [Show full text]
  • Call to Order. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. Presentations and Proclamations. Board and Commission Appointments. Consent
    REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARANSAS PASS 600 W. CLEVELAND, ARANSAS PASS, TEXAS APRIL 3, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. 1.CALL TO ORDER. 2.INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 3.PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS. 3.I.Recognition of Volunteers at Care Regional Medical Center - Randall Freeze, Business Development Executive Proclamation designating April 9-15, 2017 as "National Volunteer Week" 4.BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. 5.CONSENT AGENDA. All of the following items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 5.I.Ordinance No. 2017-4183 Ordinance amending the City of Aransas Pass Zoning Ordinances, Part III, Section 11-R16, Subsection -209; Section 11-R10, Subsection - 209; Section 11- R7A, Subsection - 209; and Section 11-D, Subsection - 209; amending the Minimum Floor Space Requirements for Zoning Districts R16, R10, R7A, and D, providing a repealer clause; and, providing for an effective date. Documents: Ord. 2017-4183 Min. Floor Space Requirements.pdf 5.II.Ordinance No. 2017-4184 Ordinance amending the City of Aransas Pass Code of Ordinances by amending Chapter 24, Platting and Subdivisions, Article I - In General, by amending the Minimum Distance Required to connect to public water lines; providing a repealer clause and providing for an effective date. Documents: Ord 2017-4184 Required Distance from Public Water Line.pdf 5.III.Ordinance No.
    [Show full text]