The Case of Sharon Considered from the Vantage Point of Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy 42 K.L. Critchfield, J. Dobner-Pereira, & E. Stucker Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, http://pcsp.libraries.rutgers.edu Volume 17, Module 1, Article 4, pp. 42-62, 04-19-21 [copyright by author] The Case of Sharon Considered from the Vantage Point of Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy KENNETH L. CRITCHFIELD, a,b,c JULIA DOBNER-PEREIRA, a,c & ELIZA STUCKER a,c a James Madison University b Correspondence regarding this article should be sent to: Kenneth L. Critchfield, 7401, Johnston Hall, Rm. 219, 70 Alumnae Drive, Harrisonburg, VA 22807. Email:
[email protected] c The authors are grateful to the Brief Psychotherapy Research Project (J. Christopher Muran, Principal Investigator) at Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, for making available material on the case reported on in this set of articles. ______________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT In Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (IRT: Benjamin, 2003/2006; 2018) a case formulation is used to tailor interventions to each patient’s unique patterns. Using the IRT lens, psychopathology is understood as reflecting attempts to adapt to current environments using maladaptive rules and values that were learned and internalized in the context of close attachment relationships. IRT identifies precise ways in which early learning shapes present experience. Additionally, the “gift of love” (GOL) hypothesis posits that motivation to repeat maladaptive ways is linked to the wish to receive love and acceptance from specific internalized attachment figures by repeating their ways and values for the patient. The IRT case formulation has been shown to be reliable and valid (Critchfield, Benjamin, & Levenick, 2015).